Feminist judgments: immigration law opinions rewritten
This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Su...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Feminist judgments series
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Oct 2023) Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernández -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 350 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781009198950 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781009198950 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049566189 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240212s2023 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009198950 |c Online |9 978-1-009-19895-0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009198950 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009198950 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1422450244 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049566189 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/2 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Feminist judgments |b immigration law opinions rewritten |c edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY |b Cambridge University Press |c 2023 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 350 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Feminist judgments series | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Oct 2023) | ||
| 500 | |a Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernández -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh | ||
| 520 | |a This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminist jurisprudence / United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Kathleen C. |d 1975- |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lapp, Kevin |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Jennifer J. |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-009-19893-6 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-009-19894-3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034911484 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804186420882964480 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author2 | Kim, Kathleen C. 1975- Lapp, Kevin Lee, Jennifer J. |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | k c k kc kck k l kl j j l jj jjl |
| author_facet | Kim, Kathleen C. 1975- Lapp, Kevin Lee, Jennifer J. |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049566189 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009198950 (OCoLC)1422450244 (DE-599)BVBBV049566189 |
| dewey-full | 342.7308/2 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.7308/2 |
| dewey-search | 342.7308/2 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.7308 12 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009198950 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04456nmm a2200457zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049566189</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240212s2023 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009198950</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-19895-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009198950</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009198950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1422450244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049566189</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Feminist judgments</subfield><subfield code="b">immigration law opinions rewritten</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 350 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feminist judgments series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Oct 2023)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernández -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminist jurisprudence / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Kathleen C.</subfield><subfield code="d">1975-</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lapp, Kevin</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jennifer J.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-19893-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-19894-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034911484</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049566189 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:29:32Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:10:51Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781009198950 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034911484 |
| oclc_num | 1422450244 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 350 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Feminist judgments series |
| spelling | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY Cambridge University Press 2023 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 350 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Feminist judgments series Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Oct 2023) Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernández -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases Feminist jurisprudence / United States Kim, Kathleen C. 1975- edt Lapp, Kevin edt Lee, Jennifer J. edt Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-009-19893-6 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-009-19894-3 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases Feminist jurisprudence / United States |
| title | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten |
| title_auth | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten |
| title_exact_search | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten |
| title_full | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee |
| title_fullStr | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee |
| title_full_unstemmed | Feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten edited by Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, Jennifer J. Lee |
| title_short | Feminist judgments |
| title_sort | feminist judgments immigration law opinions rewritten |
| title_sub | immigration law opinions rewritten |
| topic | Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases Feminist jurisprudence / United States |
| topic_facet | Emigration and immigration law / United States / Cases Feminist jurisprudence / United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198950 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkathleenc feministjudgmentsimmigrationlawopinionsrewritten AT lappkevin feministjudgmentsimmigrationlawopinionsrewritten AT leejenniferj feministjudgmentsimmigrationlawopinionsrewritten |