Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'sitting out time'
The field of prison studies has been dominated by an androcentric outlook, with little attention paid to women. Offering a unique theoretical fusion of the sociology of imprisonment, carceral geography, feminism and cultural criminology, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bingley, U.K.
Emerald Publishing
2024
|
| Ausgabe: | First edition |
| Schriftenreihe: | Emerald studies in criminology, feminism and social change
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
| Zusammenfassung: | The field of prison studies has been dominated by an androcentric outlook, with little attention paid to women. Offering a unique theoretical fusion of the sociology of imprisonment, carceral geography, feminism and cultural criminology, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' examines how social, political, and cultural factors have shaped the development of gendered penal regimes in Eastern Europe and created an institutional battleground for opposing ideologies. Expanding from Latvia as a focal point, Arta Jalili Idrissi provides a current snapshot of women's imprisonment across the Global East. Understanding the situated and complex nature of the prison as an institution, she captures the interplay between the Soviet legacy and a neoliberal agenda within three distinct realms of punishment: spatial, procedural and relational. Revealing clashes within the prison environment, as well as their broader socio-political and ideological contexts, Jalili Idrissi also exposes the specific nuances of gender implications. The first qualitative study based on an ethnographic approach to women's carceral experiences in Latvia, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' draws parallels across Eastern Europe and throughout the neoliberal West to provide a refreshing and timely addition to the study of criminology and the sociology of imprisonment |
| Beschreibung: | Includes index. - Includes bibliographical references. - Print version record |
| Beschreibung: | 132 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781801172837 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049497483 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240410 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 240112s2024 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781801172837 |c hbk |9 978-1-80117-283-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1422403227 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049497483 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jalili-Idrissi, Arta |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1318397057 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe |b 'sitting out time' |c by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK) |
| 250 | |a First edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Bingley, U.K. |b Emerald Publishing |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 132 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Emerald studies in criminology, feminism and social change | |
| 500 | |a Includes index. - Includes bibliographical references. - Print version record | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The field of prison studies has been dominated by an androcentric outlook, with little attention paid to women. Offering a unique theoretical fusion of the sociology of imprisonment, carceral geography, feminism and cultural criminology, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' examines how social, political, and cultural factors have shaped the development of gendered penal regimes in Eastern Europe and created an institutional battleground for opposing ideologies. Expanding from Latvia as a focal point, Arta Jalili Idrissi provides a current snapshot of women's imprisonment across the Global East. Understanding the situated and complex nature of the prison as an institution, she captures the interplay between the Soviet legacy and a neoliberal agenda within three distinct realms of punishment: spatial, procedural and relational. Revealing clashes within the prison environment, as well as their broader socio-political and ideological contexts, Jalili Idrissi also exposes the specific nuances of gender implications. The first qualitative study based on an ethnographic approach to women's carceral experiences in Latvia, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' draws parallels across Eastern Europe and throughout the neoliberal West to provide a refreshing and timely addition to the study of criminology and the sociology of imprisonment | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Weibliche Gefangene |0 (DE-588)4230270-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafvollzug |0 (DE-588)4057808-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Justizvollzugsanstalt |0 (DE-588)4073137-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Osteuropa |0 (DE-588)4075739-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Lettland |0 (DE-588)4074187-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Sowjetunion |0 (DE-588)4077548-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Women prisoners / Europe, Eastern | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Imprisonment / Europe, Eastern | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Social Science ; Criminology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Prisons | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Osteuropa |0 (DE-588)4075739-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Sowjetunion |0 (DE-588)4077548-3 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Lettland |0 (DE-588)4074187-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Strafvollzug |0 (DE-588)4057808-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Justizvollzugsanstalt |0 (DE-588)4073137-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Weibliche Gefangene |0 (DE-588)4230270-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe. epub |z 978-1-80117-284-4 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, online |z 978-1-80117-282-0 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20240410 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 305.309 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4793 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4793 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 305.309 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4793 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4793 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034842686 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1806962326395420672 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Contents List of Abbreviations ix About the Author xi Acknowledgements xii Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Clash of the Ideologies and (Un)intended Outcomes 1 ‘Ins and Outs’ of the Neoliberal Project In the Soviet Grip From Difference to Sameness 5 6 9 13 Chapter 3 The Breakdown of Soviet Power and the FSU Country Transition to Market Economy 17 The Transition Process Through the Lens of Penality and Gender Perspectives: The Case Study of Latvia Foreword to Empirical Chapters 21 27 Chapter 4 Carcéral Space: ‘The Architecture Embodies Some Kind of Spirit of the Age. by Living in These Premises They Still Feel as in the Soviet Union’ The Geographical Presence Entering Carcéral Space Spatial Particularities of the Prison Site Constrained in Space and Time The Prison as a Factory The Creation of Place Gender-specific ‘Gentrification’ of Place Places of ‘Difference’ 29 30 32 33 37 39 42 45 48
viii Contents Chapter 5 Imprisonment in Transition: ‘The Whole Resocialisation Process Isn’t Professional - It Is Simply a Russian Salad’ Imprisonment in Transition The Prison Regime Under ‘New Rules’ Bureaucratic Gaze and 'Responsibilisation'in Action Synopticon and Checks and Balances in Place Thorough Guarding Rule Compliance, Incentives, and the Final Reward of Early Release Keeping Women Busy and Resocialisation via Gendered Activities Navigating Through the Prison Regime: ‘Creeping’ Materialism and the Neoliberal Agenda Chapter 6 The Collapse of Values: ‘Previously One Side [Law Enforcers] Somehow Fought for a Cause and the Other Side Fought For Their Understanding Now There Isn’t Any Side, Now They Are All Purchasable’ 53 54 57 55 61 63 66 70 76 83 84 92 94 Transformation of Informal Rules and Social Structures The ‘Snitch Zone’ Day-to-Day Prisoner-Staff Relationships Blurring the Boundaries Between Discipline, Care, and Punishment The New Moral Economy of Vulnerability ‘Here We Live as in the Soviet Times.’ 96 99 102 Final Remarks 109 References 115 Index 127
References Adams, Μ. (2022). Prisoners’ families, emotions and space. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Aebi, Μ. E, Tiago, Μ. Μ. (2018). SPACE 1 - 2018 - Council of Europe annual penal statistics: Prison populations. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/enAveb/prison/space Aidukaitc, J. (2003). From universal system of social policy to particularistic? The case of the Baltic States. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36(4), 405-426. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2003.09.002 Aidukaite, J. (2009). The transition of welfare systems in the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In A. Cerami P. Vanhuysse (Eds.), Post-communist welfare path ways: Theorizing social policy transformations in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 96-111). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Aizupc, R. (1974). Sespadsmit gadi Sibïrijâ [Sixteen years in Siberia], Toronto: ALTA. Alexievich, S. (2016). Secondhand time: The last of the soviets (B. Shayevich, Trans.). London: Fitzcarraldo editions. Alyokhina, Μ. (2017). Riot days. Milton Keynes: Penguin Random House. Anker, E. (2012). Left melodrama. Contemporary Political Theory, /7(2), 130-152. doi: 10.1057/cpt.2011.10 Annison, I, Brayford, J., Deering, J. (2015). Transforming rehabilitation: Implications for women. In J. Annison, J. Brayford, J. Deering (Eds.), Women and criminal justice: From the Corston report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 21-38). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Applebaum, A. (2003). Gulag: A history of the Soviet camps. London: Allen Lane. Arruzza, C., Bhattacharya, T., Fraser, N. (2019). Feminism for the 997c A manifesto.
London: Verso. Azbel, L., Morse, E. W, Rhodes, T. (2022). The collective body: Legacies of monastic discipline in the post-Soviet prison. Theoretical Criminology, 26(1), 57-74. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1362480620930677 Asare, Μ. (2009). Sieviesu zona [Womens zone], Riga: Dienas Gramata. Baer, L. D. (2005). Visual imprints on the prison landscape: A study on the decora tions in prison cells. Journal of Economic and Human Geography, 96(2), 209-217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00451.x Baldwin, L. (2015a). Why motherhood? Setting the scene: A personal and professional reflection. In L. Baldwin (Ed.), Mothering justice: Working with mothers in criminal and social justice settings (pp. 19-42). Hook: Waterside Press. Baldwin, L. (2015b). Mothering from prison: Understanding mothers and grandmothers, a prison perspective. In L. Baldwin (Ed.), Mothering justice working with mothers in criminal and socialjustice settings (pp. 139-166). Hook: Waterside Press. Baltic News Network. (2022). Citrus Solutions to build new prison in Liepaja for EUR 125 million. Retrieved from https://bnn-news.com/citrus-solutions-to-build-new-prisonin-liepajafor-eur-125-million-238879 Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2013). Re-create the social state. In P. Dutkiewicz R. Sakwa (Eds.), 22 ideas to fix the world: Conversations with the world’s foremost thinkers (pp. 186-202). New York, NY: New York University Press.
116 References Bergman, J. (1998). Was the Soviet Union totalitarian? The view of Soviet dissidents and the reformers of the Gorbachev era. Studies in East European Thought, 50(4), 247-281. Bergmo-Prvulovic, I. (2018). Conflicting perspectives on career: Implications for career guid ance and social justice. In T. Hooley, R. G. Sultana R. Thomsen (Eds.), Career guidancefor socialjustice: Contesting neoliheralism (pp. 143-158). London: Routledge. Bhattacharyya, G. (2018). Racial capitalism: Questions of reproduction and survival. London: Rowman Littlefield. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bohm, R. Μ. (2006). “McJustice”: On the McDonaldization of criminal justice. Justice Quarterly, 23(\), 127-146. doi: 10.1080/07418820600552576 Bonnell, V. E. (1997). Iconography of power Soviet political posters under Lenin and Stalin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Bosworth, Μ. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women's prisons. Aidershot: Dartmouth. Bosworth, Μ., Campbell, D., Demby, B., Ferranti, S. Μ., Santos, Μ. (2005). Doing prison research: Views from inside. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 249 264. doi: 10.1177/1077800404273410 Bosworth, Μ., Carabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment Society, 3(4), 501-515. doi:10.1 177/14624740122228393 Brennan, K., Milne, E., South, N., Turton, J. (2018). Women and the criminal justice system - Moving beyond the silo. In K. Brennan, E. Milne, N. South, J. Turton (Eds.), Women and the
criminal justice system: Failing victims and offenders? (pp. 1-11). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Britton, D. Μ. (2011). The gender of crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield. Brown, H. (2004). Looking to the future in Latvia. The Lancet, 364(9451), 2083 2086. doi: 10.1016/SO140-6736(04) 17566-1 Bullock, K., Bunce, A. (2018). ‘The prison don’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners. Criminology Criminal Justice, 20(1), 111-127. doi: 10.1177/1748895818800743 Burciu, N. (2023). Europeanisation of post-Soviet prisons: A comparative case study of prison policy transfer from Norway to Latvia and Lithuania. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 62(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.! 11 l/hojo.12512 Burman, Μ., Malloch, Μ., Mclvor, G. (2015). A comparison: Criminalised women in Scotland. In J. Annison, J. Brayford, J. Deering (Eds.), Women and criminal justice: From the Corston report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 59-78). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Butler, W. E. (1992). Crime in the Soviet Union: Early glimpses of the true story. British Journal of Criminology, 32(2), 144-159. Carlen, P. (1983). Womens imprisonment: A study in social control. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Carlen, P. (2002). Introduction: Women and punishment. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Women and punishment: The struggle for justice (pp. 3-20). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Carlen, P., Worrall, A. (2004). Analysing womens imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Celmina, H. (1986). Women in Soviet prisons. New York, NY: Paragon House.
Central Statistical Bureau (CSB). (2018). Offenders by selected characteristics: Females of the total number of offenders. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/ iedzivotaji/noziegumi Central Statistical Bureau (CSB). (2022). Number of convicted persons by type of pun ishment. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/iedzivotaji/tiesusistema-un-ieslodzijuma-vietas/18895-tiesu-darbiba?themeCode=TS
References 117 Cheskin, A. (2016), Russian speakers in post-Soviet Latvia: Discursive identity strategies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Chesney-Lind, Μ. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, /(1), 6-26. doi: 10.1177/1557085105282893 Christie, N. (2000). Crime control as industry: Towards Gulags, Western style (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. Ciobanu, Μ. (2009). Criminalising the past and reconstructing collective memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(2), 313-336. doi: 10.1080/09668130802630870 Citrus Solutions. (2023). Building of Liepaja prison facility: Design and build works. Retrieved from https://www.citrus.lv/cn/projccts/building-engineering/building-ofliepaja-prisonfacility-design-build-works/ Clemens, W. C. (2010). Ethnic peace, ethnic conflict: Complexity theory on why the Baltic is not the Balkans. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(3), 245-261. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.07.003 Clements, B. E. (1997). Bolshevik women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cornwall, A., Gideon, 1, Wilson, K. (2008). Reclaiming feminism: Gender and ncoliberalism. /£ 5 Bulletin, 39(6), 1-9. doi:10.1 11 l/j.!759-5436.2008.tb00505.x Corston, J. (2007). The Corston report: Λ review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminaljustice system. London: Home Office. Retrieved from http://criminaljusticealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Corston-report-2007.pdf Courts Office. (2023). Number of women of total known offenders. Retrieved from https://
dati.ta.gov.lv/MicroStrategy/asp/Main.aspx?evt=3140 src=Main.aspx.3140 docu mentID=29F2F1604F9BE72F7C4CBCA7F649C4B8 Council of Europe. (2022). Covid-19 pandemic helped to reduce the prison population in Europe: Council of Europe’s annual penal statistics released. Retrieved from https:// search.coe.int/directorate_of_communications/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId= 0900001680a60a50 Cradock, G. (2007). The responsibility dance: Creating neoliberal children. Childhood, 14(2), 153-172. doi: 10.1177/0907568207078325 Crewe, B. (2005). Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. In A. Liebling S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 177-208). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crewe, B. (2011a). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment Society, 13(5), 509-529. doi:10.1177/1462474511422172 Crewe, B. (2011b). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relation ships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455-468. doi:10.1177/14773708114138 Crewe, B. (2015). Inside the belly of the penal beast: Understanding the experience of imprisonment. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(1), 50-65. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v4i 1.201 Crewe, B., Hulley, S., Wright, S. (2017). The gendered pains of life imprisonment. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 1359-1378. doi:10.1093/bjc/azw088 Crewe, B., Schliehe, A., Przybylska, D. A.
(2022). ‘It causes a lot of problems’: Relational ambiguities and dynamics between prisoners and staff in a women’s prison. European Journal of Criminology, 20, Article 3. doi: 10.1177/14773708221140870 Crewe, B., Warr, I, Bennett, P., Smith, A. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56-74. doi: 10.1177/1362480613497778 Currie, E. (1997). Market, crime and community: Toward a mid-range theory of postin dustrial violence. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 147-172. doi:10.1177/1362480697 001002001
118 References Currie, E. (2005). The road to whatever: Middle-class culture and the crisis of adolescence. New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks. Dahrendorf, R. (1990). Reflections on the revolution in Europe. London: Chatto Windus. Daems, T., Robert, L. (2017). Introduction: From prisons in Europe to Europe in prisons. In T. Daems L. Robert (Eds.), Europe in prisons: Assessing the impact of European institutions on national prison systems (pp. 1-10). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Daly, K., Chesney-Lind, Μ. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497-538. doi:10.1080/07418828800089871 Damboeanu, C., Pricopie, V., Thiemann, A. (2021). Prison law and human rights in postcommunist Romania: Staff attitudes toward change. European Journal of Criminology, 18(3), 325-344. doi:10.1177/1477370819850128 Dean, J. (2022). Same as it ever was?. The New Left Review. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/same-as-it-ever-was De Giorgi, A. (2006). Re-thinking the political economy ofpunishment: Perspectives on postFordism and penal politics. Aidershot: Ashgate. Deshpande, S. (2000). Hegemonic spatial strategies: The nation-space and Hindu communalism in twentieth-century India. In P. Chatterjee P. Jcganathan (Eds.), Subaltern studies XI: Community, gender and violence (pp. 167-211). Delhi: Permanent Black. Dirga, J., Lochmannova, A., Juricek, P. (2015). The structure of the inmate population in Czech prisons. Sociologia, 47(6), 559-578. Dirsuweit, T. (1999). Carcéral spaces in South Africa: A case study of institutional power, sexuality and transgression in a
women’s prison. Geoforum, 30(1), 71-83. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)OOO3O-X Dmitrieva, A., Stepanov, V., Svyrydova, K., Lukash, L-G., Doltu, S., Golichenko Μ., . Zagrebelnyi, O. (2021). More evidence or stronger political will: Exploring the feasibility of needle and syringe programs in Ukrainian prisons. Harm Reduction Journal, /«(1), 1-14. doi:10.1186/sl2954-020-00459-z Domanska, Μ., Rogoza, J. (2021). Forward, into the past! Russia's politics of memory in the service of ‘eternal’ authoritarianism. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved from https://www.osw.waw.pl/sitcs/default/files/OSW-Report_Forwardinto-the-past_net_0.pdf Dorling, D. (2018). Peak inequality: Britain’s ticking time bomb. Bristol: Policy Press. Dostoyevsky, F. (1997). Crime and punishment. London: Penguin Group. Ecis V Latvia. (2019). 12879/09. Retrieved from https://Iaweuro.com/?p=181 Eglitis, D. (2011 ). Class, culture, and consumption: Representations of stratification in post communist Latvia. Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 423-446. doi: 10.1177/1749975510379963 Eglitis, D. S., Lace, T. (2009). Stratification and the poverty of progress in postcommu nist Latvian capitalism. Acta Sociologica, 52(4), 329-349. doi:10.1177/0001699309 348703 Engel, B. A. (2004). Women in Russia, 1700-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engel, B. A. (2017). A gendered revolution?. Revolutionary Russia, 30(2), 196-207. doi: 10.1086/658853 Enteen, G. (1995). Robert V. Daniels’s interpretation of Soviet history. The Russian Review, 54(3), 315-329. doi: 10.2307/131432 Estrada, E, Backman, O., Nilsson, A. (2016).
The darker side of equality? The declining gender gap in crime. British Journal of Criminology, 56(6), 1272-1290. doi: 10.1093/ bjc/azvl 14 European Institute for Gender Equality. (2022). Gender equality index. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2022/country/LV Eurostat. (2022). Prison statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Prison_statistics#In_2020.2C_l_out_of_19_adult_prisoners_were_women Evans, C. (2015). The “Soviet way of life” as a way of feeling. Cahiers du monde russe, 56(2-3), 543-569. doi:10.4000/monderusse.8201
References 119 Fair, H., Walmsley, R. (Eds.). (2021). Worldprison population list (13th ed.). World Prison Brief. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/ downloads/world_prison_population_list_l 3th_edition.pdf. Feeley, Μ. Μ., Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449 -474. Fernandez, E, Leze, S. (2011). Finding the moral heart of treatment: Mental health care in a French prison. Social Science Medicine, 72(9), 1563-1569. doi:10.1016/j. socscimed.2011.03.013 Fiddler, Μ. (2010). Four walls and what lies within: The meaning of space and place in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 187, 3-8. Fisher, Μ. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. Winchester: Zero Books. Fitzgibbon, D. W. (2008). Deconstructing probation: Risk and developments in practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22(1), 85-101. doi:l 0.1080/02650530701872405 Fitzgibbon, W, Lea, J. (2014). Defending probation: Beyond privatisation and security. European Journal of Probation, 6(1), 24-41. doi:10.1177/2066220314523226 Fitzgibbon, W, Lea, J. (2020). Privatizing justice: The security industry, war and crime control. London: Pluto Press. Forbes. (2023). The worlds real-time billionaires. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/ real-time-billionaircs/#3667b9103d78 Foucault, Μ. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan Trans.). London: Penguin Books. Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes offeminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. New York, NY:
Verso. Friedman, J. R. (2007). Shock and subjectivity in the age of globalization: Marginalization, exclusion, and the problem of resistance. Anthropological Theory, 7(4), 421—448. doi:10.1177/1463499607083428 Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history?. The National Interest, (16), 3-18. Galeotti, Μ. (2018). The vary: Russia’s super mafia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Gasparyan, A., Slade, G., Van Pocke, 1, Zaharia, V. (2018). Baseline study into criminal subculture in prisons in the Republic of Moldova. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Gelsthorpe, L., Morris, A. (2002). Women’s imprisonment in England and Wales: A penal paradox. Criminology Criminal Justice, 2(3), 277-301. doi:10.1 177/174889 58020020030301 Gelsthorpe, L., Wright, S. (2015). The context: Women as law-breakers. In J. Annison, J. Brayford J. Deering (Eds.), Women and the criminal justice: From the Corston Report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 39-58). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Genders, E., Player, E. (2022). Long sentenced women prisoners: Rights, risks and reha bilitation. Punishment Society, 24(1), 3-25. doi:10.1177/1462474520933097 Gilmore, R. (2023). Change everything: Racial capitalism and the casefor abolition. London: Haymarket Books. Ginzburg, E. S. (1967). Into the whirlwind (P. Stevenson Μ. Harari Trans.). London: Collins Harvill. Gooch, K., Treadwell, J. (2022). The ‘screw boys’ and the ‘businessmen’: Re-negotiating penal power, governance and legitimate authority through a prison violence reduc tion scheme. The British Journal of Criminology, online first, doi:
10.1093/bjc/azac081 Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Anchor Books. Goodkind, S. (2009). ‘You can be anything you want, but you have to believe it’: Commercialized feminism in gender-specific programs for girls. Signs, 34(2), 397-422. doi:10.1086/591086 Gray, P. Μ., Simmonds, L., Annison, J. (2016). The resettlement of women offenders: Learning the lessons: A research project focusing on the experience of the female offender. Part of the Cornwall VSF Promoting Change Project. Retrieved from https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1 /9239
120 References Hall, D. (2022). ‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(3), 544-561. doi: 10.1177/0308518X221128305 Haney, L. (2016). Prisons of the past: Penal nationalism and the politics of punish ment in Central Europe. Punishment Society, 18(3), 346-368. doi: 10.1177/ 1462474516645686 Haney, L. A. (2010). Working through mass incarceration: Gender and the politics of prison labor from east to west. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36((), 73-97. doi:10.1086/652917 Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in disguise: Penal governance and Canadian wom en's imprisonment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Harvey, D. (2001 ). Spaces of capital towards a critical geography. New York, NY: Routledge. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliheralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hayward, K. 1, Young, J. (2004). Cultural criminology: Some notes on the script. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 259-273. doi:10.1177/1362480604044 Heidensohn, E, Silvestri, Μ. (2012). Gender and crime. In Μ. Maguire, R. Morgan R. Reiner (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminology. (5th ed., pp. 336-369). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huling, T. (2002). Building a prison economy in rural America. In Μ. Mauer Μ. ChcsncyLind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 197-213). New York, NY: The New Press. Humphrey, C. (2005). Ideology in infrastructure: Architecture and Soviet imagination. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute, 7/(1), 39-58. doi:10.111 l/j.14679655.2005.00225.x Hylton, W. S. (2009). Sick on the inside: Correctional HMOs and the coming prison plague. In T. Herival P. Wright (Eds.), Prison profiteers: Who makes money from mass incarceration (pp. 179-203). New York, NY; New Press. levins, A., Crewe, B. (2015). ‘Nobody’s better than you, nobody’s worse than you’: Moral community among prisoners convicted of sexual offences. Punishment Society, 17(4), 482-501. doi:10.1177/1462474515603803 Jalili Idrissi, A. (2020). Prison space, social control and relationships in a post-Soviet wom ens prison. Doctoral thesis, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Retrieved from http://hdl. handlc.net/10026.1/15834 Jameson, F. (2003). Future city. New Left Review, (21), 65-79. Jay, Μ. (2019). Cages and crises: A Marxist analysis of mass incarceration. Historical Materialism, 27(1), 182-223. doiJO.l 163/1569206X-00001726 Jewkes, Y., Laws, B. (2020). Liminality revisited: Mapping the emotional adapta tions of women in carcéral space. Punishment and Society, 23(20), 394-412. doi: 10.1177/1462474520959623 Jewkes, Y., Moran, D. (2017). Prison architecture and design: Perspectives from crimi nology and carcéral geography. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna L. McAra (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed., pp. 541-561). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Joesalu, K. (2005). The right to happiness: Echoes of Soviet ideology in biographical nar ratives. A lltag und Ideologie im Realsozialismus, 23, 91-99. Johnston, N. (2000). Forms of constraint: A history of prison architecture. Champaign, IL:
University of Illinois Press. Kamenska, A. (2006). Independent detention monitoring in Latvia. Latvian Centre for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://cilvektiesibas.org.lv/en/publications/independentdetention-monitoring-in-latvia/ Kamenska, A., Puce, I., Laganovska, K. (2013). Prison conditions in Latvia. Retrieved from https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Prison%20 conditions%20in%20Latvia.pdf
References 121 Kaminski, Μ. Μ. (2004). Games prisoners play the tragicomic worlds of Polish prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Katz, E., Pallot, J. (2018). ‘As the thread follows the needle’: The social construction of the prisoner’s wife in Russia from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 381-396). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kemshall, H. (1998). Risk in probation practice. Aidershot: Ashgate. Kendall, K. (2002). Time to think again about cognitive behavioural programmes. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Women and punishment: The struggle for justice (pp. 182-198). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane. Klein, N. (2018). The battle for paradise: Puerto Rico takes on the disaster capitalists. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. Kojevnikov, A. (2008). The phenomenon of Soviet science. Osiris, 23(1), 115-135. doi:l 0.1086/591871 Kotkin, J. (2020). The coming of neo-feudalism: A warning to the global middle class. New York, NY: Encounter Books. Kotz, D. Μ. (2015). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kronberga, I. (2014). Latvia in the EU - Ten years later, a different Latvia?. Centre for Public Policy Providus. Retrieved from https://providus.lv/articlc_files/2721/original/ Latvia_in_the_EU_l O_years_bricf.pdf?! 415022500 Kronberga, I. (2016). Community service as the first alternative to imprisonment in Latvia: Expectations and
reality. Rivista di Criminologia, Eittimologia e Sicurezza, Y(3), 73-83. Krumins, E., Poksans, S. (1996). Brivibas atyemsanas soda izpilde [The execution of a custodial sentence], Riga: Latvijas Policijas Akadëmija. Krupnyk, L. (2018). Prisons in Poland and Ukraine: From totalitarian heritage to the modern European penitentiary system. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, 15, 105-133. doi:10.22432/pjsr.2018.15.07 Kruttschnitt, C. (2010). The paradox of women’s imprisonment. Daedalus, 139(3), 32-42. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00021 Krylov, A. B. (2018). Post-Soviet States: Challenges of development. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 18(2), 247-258. doi:10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-2-247-258 Kurvet-Käosaar, L. (2018). Travelling memory and memory of travel in Estonian women’s deportation stories. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 183-198). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Latvian Prison Administration. (2023a). Latvijas ieslodzijuma vietu karte [The map of prisons in Latvia] (pp. 8-9). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/ download?attachment Latvian Prison Administration. (2023b). Vesturiski [Historically] (pp. 28-41). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment Lee, B. (2016). Causes and cures VII: Structural violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 28, 109-114. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.05.003 Liebling, A. (1994). Suicide amongst women prisoners. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 1-9. Liebling, A. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the
silence?. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147-173. doi:10.1177/1362480699003002002 Liebling, A. (2009). Women in prison prefer legitimacy to sex. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, (63), 19-23. Liebling, A. (2011a). Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment Society, 13(5), 530-550. doi:10.1177/1462474511422159
122 References Liebling, A. (2011b). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, S(6), 484-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413807 Liebling, A. (2015). Appreciative inquiry, generative theory, and the “failed state” prison. In J. Miller R. W. Palacios (Eds.), Qualitative research in criminology (pp. 251-269). London: Transaction Publishers. Liebling, A., assisted by Arnold, H. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Liebling, A., Price, D., Shefer, G. (2011). The prison officer (2nd ed.). Cullompton: Willan. Los, Μ. (2002). The technologies of total domination. Surveillance Society, 2(1), 15-38. doi:10.24908/ss.v2il.3325 Losane, R. (2016). Resocialisation program “Miriam” as a Christian subculture group in female prison. SHS Web Conference, 30, 00044. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20163000044 Lotke, E. (1996). The prison-industrial complex. Multinational Monitor, /7(11), 18 21. Lüste, Μ. (2010). Kriminälpolitikas „pompadüras" [Criminal justice ’pompadour’}. Public Policy Center Providus. Retrieved from https://providus.lv/raksti/kriminalpolitikaspompaduras/ Marx, K., Engels, F. (1976). Collected works (Vol, 5). London: Lawrence Wishart. Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234. doi: 10.1177/1362480697001002003 Matthews, R. (1999). Doing time: An introduction to the sociology of imprisonment. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Mazerolle,
P., Rynne, 1, McPhedran, S. (2018). Exploring imprisonment across crossna tional contexts. In J. Wooldredge P. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook ofprisons and imprisonment (pp. 77-103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Milhaud, O., Moran, D. (2013). Penal space and privacy in French and Russian prisons. In D. Moran, N. Gill, D. Conlon (Eds.), Carcéral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention (pp. 167-182). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Mincke, C. (2016). From mobility to its ideology: When mobility becomes an imperative. In Μ. Endres, K. Manderscheid, C. Mincke (Eds.), The mobilities paradigm dis courses and ideologies (pp. 11-33). London: Routledge. Mincke, C. (2017). Prison: Legitimacy through mobility?. In J. Turner K. Peters (Eds.), Carcéral mobilities interrogating movement in incarceration (pp. 236-249). London: Routledge. Mincke, C., Lemonne, A. (2014). Prison and (im)mobility. What about Foucault?. Mobilities, 9(4), 528-549. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961258 Minke, L., Schinkel, Μ., Beijersbergen, K., Dambocanu, C., Dirga, L., Dirkzwagcr, A. ., Wahidin, A. (2016). Multiple perspectives on imprisonment in Europe. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 103(3), 311-333. Mitchell, K. (2016). Neoliberalism and citizenship. In S. Springer, K. Birch, J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 118-129). London: Routledge. Molyneux, Μ. (2006). Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/ Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy Administration, 40(A), 425-449. doi:10.111
l/j,1467-9515.2006.00497.x Moore, L., Scraton, P. (2014). The incarceration of women: Punishing bodies, breaking spirits. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Moran, D. (2013a). Carcéral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31((), 174-190. doi:10.1068/dl8811 Moran, D. (2013b). Between outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as liminal carcéral spaces. GeoJournal, 78(2), 339-351. doi:10.1007/sl0708-011-9442-6
References 123 Moran, D., Pallot, I, Piacentini, L. (2009). Lipstick, lace, and longing: Constructions of femininity inside a Russian prison. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 700-720. doi: 10.1068/d7808 Navarro, C., Meléndez, A., Cubells, J. (2022). Incarcerated women’s experiences in Spain. Ini. Masson N. Booth (Eds.), Handbook of womens experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 328-339). London: Routledge. Nikartas, S., Tereskinas, A. (2022). Women’s pains of punishment: Experiences of female offenders serving community sentences in Lithuania. Probation Journal, 69(1), 66-85. doi: 10.1177/02645505211069443 OSP (2023). Prison population. Retrieved from https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxwebdv/OSP_OD/ OSP_OD_sociala_likump_tiesas_ likump/SKG090.px/table/tableViewLayoutl/ Oleinik, A. (2003). Organised crime, prison and post-Soviet societies (S. Curtis Trans.). Aldershot: Ashgate. Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Orwell, G. (1987). Animalfarm. London: Random House Publishing Group. Oushakinc, S. (2009). The patriotism of despair: Nation, war, and loss in Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pabjan, B. (2009). Social order in post-communist prisons: The study of prisons in Poland. In A. Renshaw E. Suarez (Eds.), Violent crime and prisons: Population, health conditions and recidivism (pp. 105-146). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Pallot, J. (2015a). The topography of incarceration: The spatial continuity of penality and the legacy of the Gulag in twentieth- and
twenty-first-century Russia. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 7(1), 26-50. Pallot, J. (2015b). The Gulag as the crucible of Russia’s 21 st-century system of punishment. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, /6(3), 681-710. doi:10.1353/ kri.2015.0044 Pallot, J., Katz, E. (2017). Waiting at the prison gate: Women, identity and the Russian penal system. London: LB. Tauris. Pallot, J., Piacentini, L., assisted by Moran, D. (2012). Gender, geography, and pun ishment: The experience of women in carcéral Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Peck, J. (2010). Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state. Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 104-110. doi: 10.1177/1362480609352784 Peck, 1, Tickell, A. T. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 34(3), 380-404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247 Piacentini, L. (2009). Russian prisons: Bringing a riddle out of hiding. eSharp Special Issue: Critical Issues in Researching Hidden Communities, 74-98. Piacentini, L. (2013). Burden or benefit? Paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2240927 Piacentini, L., Katz, E. (2018). The virtual reality of imprisonment: The impact of social media on prisoner agency and prison structure in Russian prisons. Onati SocioLegal Series, 8(2), 183-204. doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0933 Piacentini, L., Katz, E. (2022). The virtual reality of imprisonment in Russia: "Preparing myselffor prison" in a contested human rights landscape. Oxon: Routledge. Piacentini, L., Pallot, J. (2014). Tn exile
imprisonment’ in Russia. British Journal of Criminology, 54(\), 20-37. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt062 Piacentini, L., Pallot, J., Moran, D. (2009). Welcome to malaya rodina (Tittle home land’): Gender and penal order in a Russian penal colony. Social Legal Studies, 18(4), 523-542. doi: 10.1177/0964663909345097 Piacentini, L., Slade, G. (2015). Architecture and attachment: Carcéral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 179-197. doi: 10.1177/1362480615571791
124 References Platek, Μ. (2004). Hostages of destiny: Gender issues in today’s Poland. Feminist Review, 76(1), 5-25. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400140 Player, E. (2014). Women in thecriminaljusticesystem:The triumph of inertia. Criminology Criminal Justice, 14(3), 276-297. doi:10.1177/1748895813495218 Poe, Μ. T. (2003). The Russian moment in world history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pollack, S. (2008). Locked in and locked out: Imprisoning women in the shrinking and punitive welfare state. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University. Porteous, H. (2018). ‘A woman isn’t a woman when she’s not concerned about the way she looks’: Beauty labour and femininity in post-Soviet Russia. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 413^128). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Rawlinson, P. (2010). A Russian tale of crime from fear to fraternity economy and modernity. London: Pluto Press. Rhodes, L. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. California, CA: University of California Press. Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of society: Revised new century edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Rowe, A. (2011). Narratives of self and identity in women’s prisons: Stigma and the struggle for self-definition in penal regimes. Punishment Society, 13(5), 571-591. doi:10.1177/1462474511422151 Rozenbergs, J. (2012, April 27-28). On some developments in Latvian criminal law and criminal procedure. Paper presented at the European Criminal Bar Association Spring Conference,
Geneva. Runcis, Μ., Zalkalns, L. (2018). Women’s role in the alternative culture movements in Soviet Latvia, 1960-1990. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 365-380). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Saad, G. (2007). The evolutionary bases of consumption. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press. Sack, R. (2003). A geographical guide to the real and the good. London: Routledge. Sakwa, R. (2022). The end of endism. New Perspectives, 30(4), 384-388. doi: 10.1177/2336825x221132937 Scharff, C. (2016). Gender and neoliberalism: Young women as ideal neoliberal subjects. In S. Springer, K. Birch, J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 217-226). London: Routledge. Schinkel, Μ. (2015). Adaptation, the meaning of imprisonment and outcomes after release: The impact of the prison regime. Prison Service Journal (219), 24-29. Schliehe, A., Crewe, B. (2022). Top bunk, bottom bunk: Cellsharing in prisons. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(2), 484-500. doi:10.1093/bjc/azab053 Scott, D. (2015). Walking amongst the graves of the living: Reflections about doing prison research from an abolitionist perspective. In D. H. Drake, R. Earle J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook ofprison ethnography (pp. 40-58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Scott, D., Codd, H. (2010). Controversial issues in prisons. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Shafarevich, I. (1975). Socialism in our past and future. In A. I. Solzhenitsyn, Μ. Agursky, E. Barabanov, V. Borisov, K. Korsakov, I. Shafarevich (Eds.), From under the rub ble (pp.
26-66) (Μ. Scammell, Trans.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. Shamir, R. (2005). Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 197-217. doi:10.111 l/j.0735-2751.2005.00250.x Sharpe, G. (2015). Precarious identities: ‘Young’ motherhood, desistance and stigma. Criminology Criminal Justice, 15(4), 407-422. doi: 10.1177/1748895815572163 Sibley, D., Van Hoven, B. (2009). The contamination of personal space: Boundary construc tion in a prison environment. Area, 41(2), 198-206. doi:10.1111/j. 14754762.2008.00855.x
References 125 Simon, J., Sparks, R. (2013). Punishment and society: The emergence of an academic field. In J. Simon R. Sparks (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of punishment and society (pp. 120). London: SAGE. Slade, G. (2018). Unpacking prison reform in the former Soviet Union. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies, 19. doi:10.4000/pipss.5242 Slade, G., Light, Μ. (2015). Crime and criminal justice after communism: Why study the post-Soviet region?. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 147-158. doi:10.1177/1362480615571724 Slade, G., Vaiciuniene, R. (2018). In comparative perspective: The effects of incarcera tion abroad on penal subjectivity among prisoners in Lithuania. European Journal of Criminology, 15(2), 217-234. doi:10.1 177/1477370817726716 Solomon, P. H.(2015). Post-Soviet criminal justice: The persistence of distorted neoinquisitorialism. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 159-178. doi:10.1177/1362480614568746 Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1974). The Gulag archipelago (T. P. Whitney, Trans.), Vols. 1-2. New York, NY: Harper Row. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1975). As breathing and consciousness return. In A. I. Solzhenitsyn, Μ. Agursky, E. Barabanov, V. Borisov, K. Korsakov, I. Shafarevich (Eds.), From under the rubble (pp. 3-25) (Μ. Scammell, Trans.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (2007). The Gulag archipelago, 1918-1956: An experiment in literary investigation (H. Willetts, Trans.), Vol. 3. London: Harper Row. Sparks, R., Bottoms, A. E., Hay, W. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Stivrenieks, Μ. (2023).
Vadîbas komentâri par paveikto un turpmäkajiem pläniem [Management comments on what has been done and future plans]. Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment Stoop, L. (2021). Director’s statements. Retrieved from https://www.ostrov.ch/ pressdownloads?file=files/Files/Ostrov/211101_Pressekit_Ostrov_ENG.pdf Sudbury, J. (2005). Global lockdown: Race, gender and the prison-industrial complex. Oxon: Routledge. Sykes, G. Μ. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Symkovych, A. (2017). The Ukrainian response to Sykes: Prisoner hierarchy and self rule -power, legitimacy, and dynamics. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(5), 1087-1106. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azx076 Symkovych, A. (2018). Negative visibility and‘the defences of the weak’: The interplay of a managerial culture and prisoner resistance. Theoretical Criminology, 24(2), 202-221. doi:10.1177/1362480618779404 The Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. (2019). The history of the occupation of Latvia. Riga: The Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. The World Prison Brief. (2023). Latvia. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/ country/latvia Tolokonnikova, N., Zizek, S. (2014). Comradely greetings: The prison letters of Nadya and Slavoj (I. Dreiblatt Trans.). London: Verso. Toohey, J.-A. (2022). Out of sight, out of mind: The incarceration of cognitively disabled women in Australian prisons. In I. Masson N. Booth (Eds.), Handbook of womens experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 314-327). London: Routledge. Turner, J. (2016).
The prison boundary between society and carcéral space. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Vaiciuniene, R., Tereskinas, A. (2017). Transformations in prison subculture and adjust ment to imprisonment in post-Soviet Lithuanian penitentiary institutions. East European Politics and Societies, 31(3), 659-679. doi: 10.1177/0888325417711221 Vaiciuniene, R., Jalili Idrissi, A., Tereskinas, A. (2022). Carcéral collectivism and incar cerated women’s experiences in Lithuania and Latvia. In I. Masson N. Booth
126 References (Eds.), Handbook of women's experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 352-363). London: Routledge. Vander Beken, T. (2017). Learning from carcéral tours: Reflections after a Howard tour across Europe. In T. Daems L. Robert (Eds.), Europe in prisons: Assessing the impact of European institutions on national prison systems (pp. 79-101). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Vannier, Μ. (2020). Caught between a rock and a hard place-human rights, life imprison ment and gender stereotyping: A critical analysis of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik V. Russia. In S. Walklate, K. Fitz-Gibbon, J. McCulloch, J. Maher (Eds.), The Emerald handbook offeminism, criminology and social change (pp. 271-287). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Varese, F. (2002). The Russian mafia: Private protection in a new market economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Vavokhine, Y. (2004). The (post)-soviet prison subculture faced with the use of selfmanage ment doctrines by the corrections administration. Penal Field, I, I -15. doi:I0.4000/ champpcnal.399 Wacquant, L. (2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incar ceration. Ethnography, 3(4), 371-397. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. London: Duke University Press. Walker, S., Annison, 1, Beckett, S. (2019). Transforming rehabilitation: The impact of austerity and privatisation on day-to-day cultures and working practices in ‘proba tion’. Probation Journal, 66(1), 113-130. doi: 10.1177/0264550518820670 Walmsley, R. (2005). Prisons in Central and Eastern Europe. HEUN1,
Paper No. 22. Retrieved fromhttp://old.heuni.fi/en/index/publications/heunipapers/heunipapers22. prisonsincentralandeasterneurope.html West, C. (1991). The ethical dimensions of Marxist thought. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. Whitehead, P., Crawshaw, P. (2013). Shaking the foundations: On the moral economy of criminal justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 588-604. doi: 10.1093/ bjc/azt016 Whyte, D., Wiegratz, J. (2016). Neoliberalism and the moral economy offraud. London: Routledge. Yakunin, V. (2013). Thinking communally. In P. Dutkiewicz R. Sakwa (Eds.), 22 Ideas to fix the world: Conversations with the world’s foremost thinkers (pp. 150-165). New York, NY: New York University Press. Zahars, V. (2005). Notiesâtie - tauta tautâ: kriminälsodu izpildes problëmas [Convicted people - A nation within a nation: Problems with enforcement of punishment). Riga: Zvaigzne ABC. Zake, I. (2002). Gendered political subjectivity in post-soviet Latvia. Womens Studies International Forum, 25(6), 631-640. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00341-2 Zedner, L. (1998). Wayward sisters the prison for women. In N. Morris D. J. Rothman (Eds.), The Oxford history of the prison: The practice of punishment in Western soci ety (pp. 295-324). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zilinskiene, L. (2018). Women’s social adaptation models in Soviet Lithuania. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 315-330). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Zinoviev, A. (1986). Homo Sovieticus. Boston, MA: Atlantic Monthly Press. Zizek, S. (2011).
Living in the end times. London: Verso. Zlatkovska, I. (2023). Sogad uz sarunu aicinam Ilguciema cietuma prieksnieci pulkvedi Innu Zlatkovsku un Valmieras cietuma prieksnieku pulkvedi Andri Baski [Inviting for this year’s interview the Governor of Ilguciems prison Colonel Innu Zlatkovsku and the Governor of Valmiera prison Colonel Andri Baski] (pp. 10-27). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment
Index Abstract universal altruism, 16 Abuse, 6, 18,44, 55,65, 112 Agency, 27, 29-30,42,44-45, 52, 55, 112 Ancillary services, 8 Aristocrats, 9 Artificial collectivism, 16 Assessment Commission (the Commission), 68-69 Austerity, 8 Authoritarian prison regime, 53 Authoritative coercive power, 95 Authority (dynamic, criminal, political, legitimate), 4, 11, 18,48-50, 62-63, 86-87, 89,93, 107-108 Beauty labour, 46 Berlin Wall, 17 Borderless neoliberal ethos, 5 Bureaucratic gaze, 58-60 Business development, 18 Camps, 11 Capitalism (gangster capitalism), 5, 7 Capitalist system, 5, 9 Carcéral collectivism, 4, 36-37, 81 Carcéral geography, 1, 29 Carcéral space, 29 constrained in space and time, 37-39 creation of place, 42-45 entering, 32-33 gender-specific ‘gentrification’ of place, 45-48 geographical presence, 30-32 places of ‘difference’, 48-52 prison as factory, 39^42 spatial particularities of prison site, 33-37 Care, 96-99 Career criminals, 87 Central Statistical Bureau (CSB), 23 Checkpoints. 39 Children's camps, 11 Class, 13 Code of conduct, 85 Coercion-induced obedience and submission, 70 Coercive power, 16, 32 Collapse of values, 83 day-to-day prisoner-staff relationships, 94-96 discipline, care, and punishment, 96-99 incarcerated women, 104 new moral economy of vulnerability, 99-102 snitch zone, 92-94 social mobility, 105 Soviet ‘authoritarian welfare state’, 106 Soviet celebrations and festivities, 102 Soviet legacy, 107 transformation of informal rules and social structures, 84-92 Collective penal self-governance, 112 Collective punishments, 60, 112 Collective
responsibility, 60 Collectivity, 111-112 Colonies, 13 Communication, 96 Communism, 6, 10, 12, 20,41, 75 Community, 3 service, 23 Comradery, 3 Conjugal visits, 48^49 Consumerism, 11 Cooperation, 93
128 Index Coping mechanisms, 71 Council of Europe, 1-2, 23, 110 Courses, 62, 71-72, 76 Creation of place, 42-45 Crime, 8 Crime control, 8 Criminal and political camps, 11 Criminal authority, 86 Criminal justice, 7 business model application in, 8 Crisis (of being/economic), 19 Cultural criminology, 1 Cultural empowerment, 18 Custody (women in custody), 21-26 Cyclical downturns, 8 Day-to-day prisoner-staff relationships, 94-96 Democratic institutions, 23 Discipline, 96-99 Disempowerment, 53, 59 Domino effect, 8 Dormitory, 45, 50, 85,92 Double isolation, 25-26 Drugs, 54, 101 Dynamic authority, 63 Early release, 66-70 Ecis V Latvia (2019), 25 Economic crisis, 8 Economy (market/command), 1-2, 9, 11-12,17, 20,42, 76-77, 92, 108-109 Economy, efficiency, and effectiveness (three E’s), 6 Education, 3, 36, 72, 74,99, 105 Entitlements, 50, 54, 76, 81, 111 European approach, 23 European Convention on Human Rights, 110 European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 25 European Institute for Gender Equality (2022), 110 European Union (EU), 2 Factory work, 55 Family, 14, 38,42, 60, 66-67, 77. 86, 97, 108 Family Code, 14 Family ties, 77 Feminism, 1, 29 Fieldwork, 27, 38. 51, 68-69, 84-86, 96, 104 Financial resources, 42, 54, 76, 81, 111 Food parcels, 77 Forced labour camps, 13 Former Soviet Union (FSU), 1- 3 Free market, 19 G4S, 8 Gangster capitalism, 18, 26, 109 Gender equality, 15-16, 24, 110 Gender Equality Index, 110 Gender gap, 24 Gender oppression/pains, 2,7,14-15, 110 Gender ratio problem, 24,26 Gender-specific 'gentrification' of place, 30,45-48 Gendered cultural expectations, 52
Gendered measures, 26 Gendered roles, 14 and responsibilities, 7, 18, 109 Geographical presence, 30-32 Globalisation of capital, 24 Gulag system, 11-12 Hard power, 1, 53, 84 Hidden hierarchies, 83 Hierarchy(ies), 14, 83-85, 87-89, 96, 108 Homo (consumericus/sovieticus/neoSovieticus), 10, 10/z3, 19 Human factor, 62 Human rights (Europen Convention of Human Rights/Europen Court of Human Rights ECtHR), 25, 54, 59, 110, 112 Humankind, 9
Index Ideological context, 27 Ideologies, 5 difference to sameness, 13-16 ‘ins and outs’ of neoliberal project, 6-9 soviet grip, 9-13 Illusory collective solidarity, 16 Imprisonment, 27, 53 bureaucratic gaze and 'responsibilisation' in action, 58-60 pains, 29 prison regime, 76-81 prison regime under ‘new rules’, 57-58 resocialisation via gendered activities, 70-76 rule compliance, incentives, and final reward of early release, 66—70 synopticon and checks and balances in place, 61-63 in transition, 54-57 ‘In exile’imprisonment, 12 Incarcerated women, 30,42^43, 66, 88 Incentives, 66-70 Individual (freedoms, self-interests, accountability), 3, 7-10, 15-16, 20, 50, 53,57, 60, 62, 74, 93, 101, 104-105 Individualisation and individual (freedoms, self-interests, accountability), 53,81,90,107 Individualism, 111 Induction, 49 Industrialisation, 9 Inequality, 8, 20 Informal ‘laws’, 84 Informal rules, 83 Internal informers system, 83 International bodies, 1-2 Irrationality of rationality, 6 Keeping busy, 70, 76 Kids, 32, 66,81,98, 105 Kitchen, 47, 65, 77, 89 129 Labour camps, 11 Latvian penal system, 111 Latvian Prison Administration, 111 Latvian prisons, 21 Law breaking, 25 Legal and penal reforms, 1-2 Legitimacy, 62, 70 ‘Less eligibility’ principle, 35 Liberal democracy (democracy), 3, 17 Liberty, 20-21, 55, 59 Liminal carcéral spaces, 49 Liquid modernity, 111 Local neolibcralisms, 5 ‘Managerial’ ethos, 6 Market economy, 17 transition process, 21-26 women's experiences, 27 Marketisation, 77 Marxism, 5, 9 political doctrine, 40 practice, 15 tenets, 14 Marxist utopian vision, 10
Marxist-Leninist doctrines, 10 Material context, 27 Materialistic values, 111 Maternal mandate, 26, 65 Matryoshka, 4 McDonaldisation model of society, 6-7 McJustice, 6-7 Military discipline and protocol, 95 Mobilitarian ideology, 53-54, 65, 70 Monuments, 109 Moral economy (of vulnerability), 99-102 Motherhood, 50 National identity, recreation of, 18 Neo-inquisitorialism, 51 Neo-sovietism, 113 Neofeudalism, 110 Neoliberal economic reforms, 7 Neoliberal project, 5 ins and outs of, 6-9
130 Index Neoliberalism (neoliberal project), 2, 5,8, НО New Criminal Law, 22 New moral economy of vulnerability, 99-102 Nostalgia, 3, 84 Obedience, 59 Offsite work, 55 Old style’ military discipline, 95 Operational power, 63 Organised crime groups, 18 Orthodox Church, 11 Pains of imprisonment, 37 Penal culture, 112 Penal geography, 30 Penal institutions, 3, 7 Penal philosophy, 39-40 Penal power, 1, 46 Penal regimes, 2 Penal system, 110 Personal deficiencies, 73 Personal hygiene, 47 Phone calls, 77 Phone charges, 77 Place creation, 42-45 Places of ‘différence’, 48-52 Political power, 16 Polyopticon, 92 Post-Soviet societies, 113 Power (soft/hard), 1-2, 53, 56-58, 84, 95, 98, 107, 112-113 Preoccupation, 99 Prevailing uncertainty, 111 Prison regime, 53, 76-81 under ‘new rules’, 57-58 Prison staff, 38,41, 47, 54-55, 89, 112 in male prisons, 66 Prison/living conditions, 12, 36, 46, 50 Prison’s ‘oasis’, 50 Prisoners, 12, 87 contingent, 75 hierarchies, 83-84 Prisons, 13, 53, 109 administration, 33-34, 45-46, 56, 59, 99, 112 estate, 55 as factory, 39-42 industrial complex, 8, 15 labour, 12 layout and design, 52 life, 29 management, 8 officers, 96 population, 22, 26 researchers, 4 rules, 22-23,44, 56, 58, 94 school, 50 space, 29,45 Privileges, 4, 22, 26, 54 Procedural context, 27 Programmes, 23, 54,70, 72-73, 76 Progression, 4, 53-54, 57, 59, 67-70, 81 Progressive stage system, 57 Proletarian revolution, 9 Public institution placement, 6 Punishment, 32, 53, 96-99, 111 camps, 11 Radical historicist approach, 9 Radical pro-corporate agenda, 6 Recorded crime, 23 “Refeminisation” of
inmates, 72 Rehabilitation, 72 Relationships-for-intelligence, 79 Remand, 24-25, 32, 37, 50-51, 57, 69, 77, 100 Resilience of ‘carcéral collectivism’, 112 Resocialisation via gendered activities, 70-76 process, 47 Respect, 62,91,95, 112 Responsibilisation in action, 58-60 Revolutionary iconography, 14 Rights-based approach, 1, 84
Index Risk (of reoffending/management/ agenda/assessment), 6, 53-54, 59,66, 80, 102, 107 Rule compliance, 66-70 Russian autocracy, 11 Russian history and culture, 9 Russian language, 111 Russian male penal subcultures, 86 Russian salad, 75 School graduation ceremony, 74 Second-class citizenship within male institutions, 26 Security (high/low), 25, 34, 37, 50, 57, 65 Self-harm, 99 Self-interests, 111 Self-regulation, 90 Sentence Execution Code of Latvia, 25-26 Sentencing patterns, 24 Serco, 8 Sex offenders, 89 Shock doctrine, 6 Simplicity, 3 Slave labour, 15 Snitch zone, 92-94 Social mobility, 105 Socialism, 2, 11 Societal waste, 35 Society, 53 Sociology of imprisonment, 1, 29 Soft power, 1, 53, 84 Solidarity, 9 Solitary confinement, 64, 89 Soviet approach, 84 Soviet celebrations and festivities, 102 Soviet ideology (Soviet project), 2-3 Soviet imprisonment, 39-40 Soviet legacy, 20, 29, 39, 80, 107 aspects, 30 Soviet Penal Code, 12 Soviet people, 10 Soviet power, 13 Soviet prison regime, core element of, 55 131 Soviet project, 5-6, 9, 13 breakdown, 19-20 ideological framework and collapse, 53 Soviet romanticism/nostalgia, 84, 109 Soviet system, 11,14 Soviet times, 3, 30, 34, 39—41,47, 56, 70, 74-75,81,84-85, 103, 107, 111 Soviet-style bench, 31-32 Soviet-style socialism, 5 Spataliscd technologies, 113 Spatial arrangements, 38-39 Spatial particularities of prison site, 33-37 Special custodial provisions, 26 State enemies, 12 State’s administrative institutions, 101 Suicides, 99 ‘Surplus’ labour force, 8 Synopticon and checks and balances in place, 61-63 Thieves in law, 85-86,
88, 91 Three strikes policy, 65 Time and gendered cultural assumptions, 2 Togetherness, 111-112 Totalitarian regime, 92 Transformation of informal rules and social structures, 84—92 Transit camps, 11 Transition process, 2, 21-26 True believers, 19-20 Tsarist regime, 9 Tuberculosis (ТВ), 21 Two-tier ‘justice’ system, 7 Universalisation of Western liberal democracy, 17 Values, 2-4, 6, 9-11, 15, 19-20, 27,40, 45-46, 50-51,53, 63, 76, 81, 84, 104, 107, 109, 111, 113
132 Index Violence (structural/physical/ symbolic/intimate partner), 13, 18-19, 37, 44, 48, 55, 64, 73, 90, 99, 109, 112 Visitors, 31-33, 66, 76-77 Women, 2, 7 camps, 11 imprisonment, 26 in Latvia, 59 Work, 40 of probation, 101 Western liberal democracy, 3 Western style neoliberalism, 17 Zek(a), 85 Zone, 38 |
| adam_txt |
Contents List of Abbreviations ix About the Author xi Acknowledgements xii Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Clash of the Ideologies and (Un)intended Outcomes 1 ‘Ins and Outs’ of the Neoliberal Project In the Soviet Grip From Difference to Sameness 5 6 9 13 Chapter 3 The Breakdown of Soviet Power and the FSU Country Transition to Market Economy 17 The Transition Process Through the Lens of Penality and Gender Perspectives: The Case Study of Latvia Foreword to Empirical Chapters 21 27 Chapter 4 Carcéral Space: ‘The Architecture Embodies Some Kind of Spirit of the Age. by Living in These Premises They Still Feel as in the Soviet Union’ The Geographical Presence Entering Carcéral Space Spatial Particularities of the Prison Site Constrained in Space and Time The Prison as a Factory The Creation of Place Gender-specific ‘Gentrification’ of Place Places of ‘Difference’ 29 30 32 33 37 39 42 45 48
viii Contents Chapter 5 Imprisonment in Transition: ‘The Whole Resocialisation Process Isn’t Professional - It Is Simply a Russian Salad’ Imprisonment in Transition The Prison Regime Under ‘New Rules’ Bureaucratic Gaze and 'Responsibilisation'in Action Synopticon and Checks and Balances in Place Thorough Guarding Rule Compliance, Incentives, and the Final Reward of Early Release Keeping Women Busy and Resocialisation via Gendered Activities Navigating Through the Prison Regime: ‘Creeping’ Materialism and the Neoliberal Agenda Chapter 6 The Collapse of Values: ‘Previously One Side [Law Enforcers] Somehow Fought for a Cause and the Other Side Fought For Their Understanding Now There Isn’t Any Side, Now They Are All Purchasable’ 53 54 57 55 61 63 66 70 76 83 84 92 94 Transformation of Informal Rules and Social Structures The ‘Snitch Zone’ Day-to-Day Prisoner-Staff Relationships Blurring the Boundaries Between Discipline, Care, and Punishment The New Moral Economy of Vulnerability ‘Here We Live as in the Soviet Times.’ 96 99 102 Final Remarks 109 References 115 Index 127
References Adams, Μ. (2022). Prisoners’ families, emotions and space. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Aebi, Μ. E, Tiago, Μ. Μ. (2018). SPACE 1 - 2018 - Council of Europe annual penal statistics: Prison populations. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/enAveb/prison/space Aidukaitc, J. (2003). From universal system of social policy to particularistic? The case of the Baltic States. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36(4), 405-426. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2003.09.002 Aidukaite, J. (2009). The transition of welfare systems in the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In A. Cerami P. Vanhuysse (Eds.), Post-communist welfare path ways: Theorizing social policy transformations in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 96-111). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Aizupc, R. (1974). Sespadsmit gadi Sibïrijâ [Sixteen years in Siberia], Toronto: ALTA. Alexievich, S. (2016). Secondhand time: The last of the soviets (B. Shayevich, Trans.). London: Fitzcarraldo editions. Alyokhina, Μ. (2017). Riot days. Milton Keynes: Penguin Random House. Anker, E. (2012). Left melodrama. Contemporary Political Theory, /7(2), 130-152. doi: 10.1057/cpt.2011.10 Annison, I, Brayford, J., Deering, J. (2015). Transforming rehabilitation: Implications for women. In J. Annison, J. Brayford, J. Deering (Eds.), Women and criminal justice: From the Corston report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 21-38). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Applebaum, A. (2003). Gulag: A history of the Soviet camps. London: Allen Lane. Arruzza, C., Bhattacharya, T., Fraser, N. (2019). Feminism for the 997c A manifesto.
London: Verso. Azbel, L., Morse, E. W, Rhodes, T. (2022). The collective body: Legacies of monastic discipline in the post-Soviet prison. Theoretical Criminology, 26(1), 57-74. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1362480620930677 Asare, Μ. (2009). Sieviesu zona [Womens zone], Riga: Dienas Gramata. Baer, L. D. (2005). Visual imprints on the prison landscape: A study on the decora tions in prison cells. Journal of Economic and Human Geography, 96(2), 209-217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00451.x Baldwin, L. (2015a). Why motherhood? Setting the scene: A personal and professional reflection. In L. Baldwin (Ed.), Mothering justice: Working with mothers in criminal and social justice settings (pp. 19-42). Hook: Waterside Press. Baldwin, L. (2015b). Mothering from prison: Understanding mothers and grandmothers, a prison perspective. In L. Baldwin (Ed.), Mothering justice working with mothers in criminal and socialjustice settings (pp. 139-166). Hook: Waterside Press. Baltic News Network. (2022). Citrus Solutions to build new prison in Liepaja for EUR 125 million. Retrieved from https://bnn-news.com/citrus-solutions-to-build-new-prisonin-liepajafor-eur-125-million-238879 Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2013). Re-create the social state. In P. Dutkiewicz R. Sakwa (Eds.), 22 ideas to fix the world: Conversations with the world’s foremost thinkers (pp. 186-202). New York, NY: New York University Press.
116 References Bergman, J. (1998). Was the Soviet Union totalitarian? The view of Soviet dissidents and the reformers of the Gorbachev era. Studies in East European Thought, 50(4), 247-281. Bergmo-Prvulovic, I. (2018). Conflicting perspectives on career: Implications for career guid ance and social justice. In T. Hooley, R. G. Sultana R. Thomsen (Eds.), Career guidancefor socialjustice: Contesting neoliheralism (pp. 143-158). London: Routledge. Bhattacharyya, G. (2018). Racial capitalism: Questions of reproduction and survival. London: Rowman Littlefield. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bohm, R. Μ. (2006). “McJustice”: On the McDonaldization of criminal justice. Justice Quarterly, 23(\), 127-146. doi: 10.1080/07418820600552576 Bonnell, V. E. (1997). Iconography of power Soviet political posters under Lenin and Stalin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Bosworth, Μ. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women's prisons. Aidershot: Dartmouth. Bosworth, Μ., Campbell, D., Demby, B., Ferranti, S. Μ., Santos, Μ. (2005). Doing prison research: Views from inside. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 249 264. doi: 10.1177/1077800404273410 Bosworth, Μ., Carabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment Society, 3(4), 501-515. doi:10.1 177/14624740122228393 Brennan, K., Milne, E., South, N., Turton, J. (2018). Women and the criminal justice system - Moving beyond the silo. In K. Brennan, E. Milne, N. South, J. Turton (Eds.), Women and the
criminal justice system: Failing victims and offenders? (pp. 1-11). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Britton, D. Μ. (2011). The gender of crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield. Brown, H. (2004). Looking to the future in Latvia. The Lancet, 364(9451), 2083 2086. doi: 10.1016/SO140-6736(04) 17566-1 Bullock, K., Bunce, A. (2018). ‘The prison don’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners. Criminology Criminal Justice, 20(1), 111-127. doi: 10.1177/1748895818800743 Burciu, N. (2023). Europeanisation of post-Soviet prisons: A comparative case study of prison policy transfer from Norway to Latvia and Lithuania. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 62(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.! 11 l/hojo.12512 Burman, Μ., Malloch, Μ., Mclvor, G. (2015). A comparison: Criminalised women in Scotland. In J. Annison, J. Brayford, J. Deering (Eds.), Women and criminal justice: From the Corston report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 59-78). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Butler, W. E. (1992). Crime in the Soviet Union: Early glimpses of the true story. British Journal of Criminology, 32(2), 144-159. Carlen, P. (1983). Womens imprisonment: A study in social control. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Carlen, P. (2002). Introduction: Women and punishment. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Women and punishment: The struggle for justice (pp. 3-20). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Carlen, P., Worrall, A. (2004). Analysing womens imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Celmina, H. (1986). Women in Soviet prisons. New York, NY: Paragon House.
Central Statistical Bureau (CSB). (2018). Offenders by selected characteristics: Females of the total number of offenders. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/ iedzivotaji/noziegumi Central Statistical Bureau (CSB). (2022). Number of convicted persons by type of pun ishment. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/lv/statistikas-temas/iedzivotaji/tiesusistema-un-ieslodzijuma-vietas/18895-tiesu-darbiba?themeCode=TS
References 117 Cheskin, A. (2016), Russian speakers in post-Soviet Latvia: Discursive identity strategies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Chesney-Lind, Μ. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, /(1), 6-26. doi: 10.1177/1557085105282893 Christie, N. (2000). Crime control as industry: Towards Gulags, Western style (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. Ciobanu, Μ. (2009). Criminalising the past and reconstructing collective memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(2), 313-336. doi: 10.1080/09668130802630870 Citrus Solutions. (2023). Building of Liepaja prison facility: Design and build works. Retrieved from https://www.citrus.lv/cn/projccts/building-engineering/building-ofliepaja-prisonfacility-design-build-works/ Clemens, W. C. (2010). Ethnic peace, ethnic conflict: Complexity theory on why the Baltic is not the Balkans. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(3), 245-261. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.07.003 Clements, B. E. (1997). Bolshevik women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cornwall, A., Gideon, 1, Wilson, K. (2008). Reclaiming feminism: Gender and ncoliberalism. /£ 5 Bulletin, 39(6), 1-9. doi:10.1 11 l/j.!759-5436.2008.tb00505.x Corston, J. (2007). The Corston report: Λ review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminaljustice system. London: Home Office. Retrieved from http://criminaljusticealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Corston-report-2007.pdf Courts Office. (2023). Number of women of total known offenders. Retrieved from https://
dati.ta.gov.lv/MicroStrategy/asp/Main.aspx?evt=3140 src=Main.aspx.3140 docu mentID=29F2F1604F9BE72F7C4CBCA7F649C4B8 Council of Europe. (2022). Covid-19 pandemic helped to reduce the prison population in Europe: Council of Europe’s annual penal statistics released. Retrieved from https:// search.coe.int/directorate_of_communications/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId= 0900001680a60a50 Cradock, G. (2007). The responsibility dance: Creating neoliberal children. Childhood, 14(2), 153-172. doi: 10.1177/0907568207078325 Crewe, B. (2005). Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. In A. Liebling S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 177-208). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crewe, B. (2011a). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment Society, 13(5), 509-529. doi:10.1177/1462474511422172 Crewe, B. (2011b). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relation ships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455-468. doi:10.1177/14773708114138 Crewe, B. (2015). Inside the belly of the penal beast: Understanding the experience of imprisonment. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(1), 50-65. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v4i 1.201 Crewe, B., Hulley, S., Wright, S. (2017). The gendered pains of life imprisonment. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 1359-1378. doi:10.1093/bjc/azw088 Crewe, B., Schliehe, A., Przybylska, D. A.
(2022). ‘It causes a lot of problems’: Relational ambiguities and dynamics between prisoners and staff in a women’s prison. European Journal of Criminology, 20, Article 3. doi: 10.1177/14773708221140870 Crewe, B., Warr, I, Bennett, P., Smith, A. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56-74. doi: 10.1177/1362480613497778 Currie, E. (1997). Market, crime and community: Toward a mid-range theory of postin dustrial violence. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 147-172. doi:10.1177/1362480697 001002001
118 References Currie, E. (2005). The road to whatever: Middle-class culture and the crisis of adolescence. New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks. Dahrendorf, R. (1990). Reflections on the revolution in Europe. London: Chatto Windus. Daems, T., Robert, L. (2017). Introduction: From prisons in Europe to Europe in prisons. In T. Daems L. Robert (Eds.), Europe in prisons: Assessing the impact of European institutions on national prison systems (pp. 1-10). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Daly, K., Chesney-Lind, Μ. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497-538. doi:10.1080/07418828800089871 Damboeanu, C., Pricopie, V., Thiemann, A. (2021). Prison law and human rights in postcommunist Romania: Staff attitudes toward change. European Journal of Criminology, 18(3), 325-344. doi:10.1177/1477370819850128 Dean, J. (2022). Same as it ever was?. The New Left Review. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/same-as-it-ever-was De Giorgi, A. (2006). Re-thinking the political economy ofpunishment: Perspectives on postFordism and penal politics. Aidershot: Ashgate. Deshpande, S. (2000). Hegemonic spatial strategies: The nation-space and Hindu communalism in twentieth-century India. In P. Chatterjee P. Jcganathan (Eds.), Subaltern studies XI: Community, gender and violence (pp. 167-211). Delhi: Permanent Black. Dirga, J., Lochmannova, A., Juricek, P. (2015). The structure of the inmate population in Czech prisons. Sociologia, 47(6), 559-578. Dirsuweit, T. (1999). Carcéral spaces in South Africa: A case study of institutional power, sexuality and transgression in a
women’s prison. Geoforum, 30(1), 71-83. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)OOO3O-X Dmitrieva, A., Stepanov, V., Svyrydova, K., Lukash, L-G., Doltu, S., Golichenko Μ., . Zagrebelnyi, O. (2021). More evidence or stronger political will: Exploring the feasibility of needle and syringe programs in Ukrainian prisons. Harm Reduction Journal, /«(1), 1-14. doi:10.1186/sl2954-020-00459-z Domanska, Μ., Rogoza, J. (2021). Forward, into the past! Russia's politics of memory in the service of ‘eternal’ authoritarianism. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved from https://www.osw.waw.pl/sitcs/default/files/OSW-Report_Forwardinto-the-past_net_0.pdf Dorling, D. (2018). Peak inequality: Britain’s ticking time bomb. Bristol: Policy Press. Dostoyevsky, F. (1997). Crime and punishment. London: Penguin Group. Ecis V Latvia. (2019). 12879/09. Retrieved from https://Iaweuro.com/?p=181 Eglitis, D. (2011 ). Class, culture, and consumption: Representations of stratification in post communist Latvia. Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 423-446. doi: 10.1177/1749975510379963 Eglitis, D. S., Lace, T. (2009). Stratification and the poverty of progress in postcommu nist Latvian capitalism. Acta Sociologica, 52(4), 329-349. doi:10.1177/0001699309 348703 Engel, B. A. (2004). Women in Russia, 1700-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engel, B. A. (2017). A gendered revolution?. Revolutionary Russia, 30(2), 196-207. doi: 10.1086/658853 Enteen, G. (1995). Robert V. Daniels’s interpretation of Soviet history. The Russian Review, 54(3), 315-329. doi: 10.2307/131432 Estrada, E, Backman, O., Nilsson, A. (2016).
The darker side of equality? The declining gender gap in crime. British Journal of Criminology, 56(6), 1272-1290. doi: 10.1093/ bjc/azvl 14 European Institute for Gender Equality. (2022). Gender equality index. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2022/country/LV Eurostat. (2022). Prison statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Prison_statistics#In_2020.2C_l_out_of_19_adult_prisoners_were_women Evans, C. (2015). The “Soviet way of life” as a way of feeling. Cahiers du monde russe, 56(2-3), 543-569. doi:10.4000/monderusse.8201
References 119 Fair, H., Walmsley, R. (Eds.). (2021). Worldprison population list (13th ed.). World Prison Brief. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/ downloads/world_prison_population_list_l 3th_edition.pdf. Feeley, Μ. Μ., Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449 -474. Fernandez, E, Leze, S. (2011). Finding the moral heart of treatment: Mental health care in a French prison. Social Science Medicine, 72(9), 1563-1569. doi:10.1016/j. socscimed.2011.03.013 Fiddler, Μ. (2010). Four walls and what lies within: The meaning of space and place in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 187, 3-8. Fisher, Μ. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. Winchester: Zero Books. Fitzgibbon, D. W. (2008). Deconstructing probation: Risk and developments in practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22(1), 85-101. doi:l 0.1080/02650530701872405 Fitzgibbon, W, Lea, J. (2014). Defending probation: Beyond privatisation and security. European Journal of Probation, 6(1), 24-41. doi:10.1177/2066220314523226 Fitzgibbon, W, Lea, J. (2020). Privatizing justice: The security industry, war and crime control. London: Pluto Press. Forbes. (2023). The worlds real-time billionaires. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/ real-time-billionaircs/#3667b9103d78 Foucault, Μ. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan Trans.). London: Penguin Books. Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes offeminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. New York, NY:
Verso. Friedman, J. R. (2007). Shock and subjectivity in the age of globalization: Marginalization, exclusion, and the problem of resistance. Anthropological Theory, 7(4), 421—448. doi:10.1177/1463499607083428 Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history?. The National Interest, (16), 3-18. Galeotti, Μ. (2018). The vary: Russia’s super mafia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Gasparyan, A., Slade, G., Van Pocke, 1, Zaharia, V. (2018). Baseline study into criminal subculture in prisons in the Republic of Moldova. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Gelsthorpe, L., Morris, A. (2002). Women’s imprisonment in England and Wales: A penal paradox. Criminology Criminal Justice, 2(3), 277-301. doi:10.1 177/174889 58020020030301 Gelsthorpe, L., Wright, S. (2015). The context: Women as law-breakers. In J. Annison, J. Brayford J. Deering (Eds.), Women and the criminal justice: From the Corston Report to transforming rehabilitation (pp. 39-58). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Genders, E., Player, E. (2022). Long sentenced women prisoners: Rights, risks and reha bilitation. Punishment Society, 24(1), 3-25. doi:10.1177/1462474520933097 Gilmore, R. (2023). Change everything: Racial capitalism and the casefor abolition. London: Haymarket Books. Ginzburg, E. S. (1967). Into the whirlwind (P. Stevenson Μ. Harari Trans.). London: Collins Harvill. Gooch, K., Treadwell, J. (2022). The ‘screw boys’ and the ‘businessmen’: Re-negotiating penal power, governance and legitimate authority through a prison violence reduc tion scheme. The British Journal of Criminology, online first, doi:
10.1093/bjc/azac081 Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Anchor Books. Goodkind, S. (2009). ‘You can be anything you want, but you have to believe it’: Commercialized feminism in gender-specific programs for girls. Signs, 34(2), 397-422. doi:10.1086/591086 Gray, P. Μ., Simmonds, L., Annison, J. (2016). The resettlement of women offenders: Learning the lessons: A research project focusing on the experience of the female offender. Part of the Cornwall VSF Promoting Change Project. Retrieved from https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1 /9239
120 References Hall, D. (2022). ‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(3), 544-561. doi: 10.1177/0308518X221128305 Haney, L. (2016). Prisons of the past: Penal nationalism and the politics of punish ment in Central Europe. Punishment Society, 18(3), 346-368. doi: 10.1177/ 1462474516645686 Haney, L. A. (2010). Working through mass incarceration: Gender and the politics of prison labor from east to west. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36((), 73-97. doi:10.1086/652917 Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in disguise: Penal governance and Canadian wom en's imprisonment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Harvey, D. (2001 ). Spaces of capital towards a critical geography. New York, NY: Routledge. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliheralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hayward, K. 1, Young, J. (2004). Cultural criminology: Some notes on the script. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 259-273. doi:10.1177/1362480604044 Heidensohn, E, Silvestri, Μ. (2012). Gender and crime. In Μ. Maguire, R. Morgan R. Reiner (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminology. (5th ed., pp. 336-369). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huling, T. (2002). Building a prison economy in rural America. In Μ. Mauer Μ. ChcsncyLind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 197-213). New York, NY: The New Press. Humphrey, C. (2005). Ideology in infrastructure: Architecture and Soviet imagination. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute, 7/(1), 39-58. doi:10.111 l/j.14679655.2005.00225.x Hylton, W. S. (2009). Sick on the inside: Correctional HMOs and the coming prison plague. In T. Herival P. Wright (Eds.), Prison profiteers: Who makes money from mass incarceration (pp. 179-203). New York, NY; New Press. levins, A., Crewe, B. (2015). ‘Nobody’s better than you, nobody’s worse than you’: Moral community among prisoners convicted of sexual offences. Punishment Society, 17(4), 482-501. doi:10.1177/1462474515603803 Jalili Idrissi, A. (2020). Prison space, social control and relationships in a post-Soviet wom ens prison. Doctoral thesis, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Retrieved from http://hdl. handlc.net/10026.1/15834 Jameson, F. (2003). Future city. New Left Review, (21), 65-79. Jay, Μ. (2019). Cages and crises: A Marxist analysis of mass incarceration. Historical Materialism, 27(1), 182-223. doiJO.l 163/1569206X-00001726 Jewkes, Y., Laws, B. (2020). Liminality revisited: Mapping the emotional adapta tions of women in carcéral space. Punishment and Society, 23(20), 394-412. doi: 10.1177/1462474520959623 Jewkes, Y., Moran, D. (2017). Prison architecture and design: Perspectives from crimi nology and carcéral geography. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna L. McAra (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed., pp. 541-561). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Joesalu, K. (2005). The right to happiness: Echoes of Soviet ideology in biographical nar ratives. A lltag und Ideologie im Realsozialismus, 23, 91-99. Johnston, N. (2000). Forms of constraint: A history of prison architecture. Champaign, IL:
University of Illinois Press. Kamenska, A. (2006). Independent detention monitoring in Latvia. Latvian Centre for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://cilvektiesibas.org.lv/en/publications/independentdetention-monitoring-in-latvia/ Kamenska, A., Puce, I., Laganovska, K. (2013). Prison conditions in Latvia. Retrieved from https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Prison%20 conditions%20in%20Latvia.pdf
References 121 Kaminski, Μ. Μ. (2004). Games prisoners play the tragicomic worlds of Polish prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Katz, E., Pallot, J. (2018). ‘As the thread follows the needle’: The social construction of the prisoner’s wife in Russia from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 381-396). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kemshall, H. (1998). Risk in probation practice. Aidershot: Ashgate. Kendall, K. (2002). Time to think again about cognitive behavioural programmes. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Women and punishment: The struggle for justice (pp. 182-198). Cullompton: Willan Publishing. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane. Klein, N. (2018). The battle for paradise: Puerto Rico takes on the disaster capitalists. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. Kojevnikov, A. (2008). The phenomenon of Soviet science. Osiris, 23(1), 115-135. doi:l 0.1086/591871 Kotkin, J. (2020). The coming of neo-feudalism: A warning to the global middle class. New York, NY: Encounter Books. Kotz, D. Μ. (2015). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kronberga, I. (2014). Latvia in the EU - Ten years later, a different Latvia?. Centre for Public Policy Providus. Retrieved from https://providus.lv/articlc_files/2721/original/ Latvia_in_the_EU_l O_years_bricf.pdf?! 415022500 Kronberga, I. (2016). Community service as the first alternative to imprisonment in Latvia: Expectations and
reality. Rivista di Criminologia, Eittimologia e Sicurezza, Y(3), 73-83. Krumins, E., Poksans, S. (1996). Brivibas atyemsanas soda izpilde [The execution of a custodial sentence], Riga: Latvijas Policijas Akadëmija. Krupnyk, L. (2018). Prisons in Poland and Ukraine: From totalitarian heritage to the modern European penitentiary system. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, 15, 105-133. doi:10.22432/pjsr.2018.15.07 Kruttschnitt, C. (2010). The paradox of women’s imprisonment. Daedalus, 139(3), 32-42. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00021 Krylov, A. B. (2018). Post-Soviet States: Challenges of development. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 18(2), 247-258. doi:10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-2-247-258 Kurvet-Käosaar, L. (2018). Travelling memory and memory of travel in Estonian women’s deportation stories. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 183-198). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Latvian Prison Administration. (2023a). Latvijas ieslodzijuma vietu karte [The map of prisons in Latvia] (pp. 8-9). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/ download?attachment Latvian Prison Administration. (2023b). Vesturiski [Historically] (pp. 28-41). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment Lee, B. (2016). Causes and cures VII: Structural violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 28, 109-114. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.05.003 Liebling, A. (1994). Suicide amongst women prisoners. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 1-9. Liebling, A. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the
silence?. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147-173. doi:10.1177/1362480699003002002 Liebling, A. (2009). Women in prison prefer legitimacy to sex. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, (63), 19-23. Liebling, A. (2011a). Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment Society, 13(5), 530-550. doi:10.1177/1462474511422159
122 References Liebling, A. (2011b). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, S(6), 484-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413807 Liebling, A. (2015). Appreciative inquiry, generative theory, and the “failed state” prison. In J. Miller R. W. Palacios (Eds.), Qualitative research in criminology (pp. 251-269). London: Transaction Publishers. Liebling, A., assisted by Arnold, H. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Liebling, A., Price, D., Shefer, G. (2011). The prison officer (2nd ed.). Cullompton: Willan. Los, Μ. (2002). The technologies of total domination. Surveillance Society, 2(1), 15-38. doi:10.24908/ss.v2il.3325 Losane, R. (2016). Resocialisation program “Miriam” as a Christian subculture group in female prison. SHS Web Conference, 30, 00044. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20163000044 Lotke, E. (1996). The prison-industrial complex. Multinational Monitor, /7(11), 18 21. Lüste, Μ. (2010). Kriminälpolitikas „pompadüras" [Criminal justice ’pompadour’}. Public Policy Center Providus. Retrieved from https://providus.lv/raksti/kriminalpolitikaspompaduras/ Marx, K., Engels, F. (1976). Collected works (Vol, 5). London: Lawrence Wishart. Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234. doi: 10.1177/1362480697001002003 Matthews, R. (1999). Doing time: An introduction to the sociology of imprisonment. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Mazerolle,
P., Rynne, 1, McPhedran, S. (2018). Exploring imprisonment across crossna tional contexts. In J. Wooldredge P. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook ofprisons and imprisonment (pp. 77-103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Milhaud, O., Moran, D. (2013). Penal space and privacy in French and Russian prisons. In D. Moran, N. Gill, D. Conlon (Eds.), Carcéral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention (pp. 167-182). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Mincke, C. (2016). From mobility to its ideology: When mobility becomes an imperative. In Μ. Endres, K. Manderscheid, C. Mincke (Eds.), The mobilities paradigm dis courses and ideologies (pp. 11-33). London: Routledge. Mincke, C. (2017). Prison: Legitimacy through mobility?. In J. Turner K. Peters (Eds.), Carcéral mobilities interrogating movement in incarceration (pp. 236-249). London: Routledge. Mincke, C., Lemonne, A. (2014). Prison and (im)mobility. What about Foucault?. Mobilities, 9(4), 528-549. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961258 Minke, L., Schinkel, Μ., Beijersbergen, K., Dambocanu, C., Dirga, L., Dirkzwagcr, A. ., Wahidin, A. (2016). Multiple perspectives on imprisonment in Europe. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 103(3), 311-333. Mitchell, K. (2016). Neoliberalism and citizenship. In S. Springer, K. Birch, J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 118-129). London: Routledge. Molyneux, Μ. (2006). Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/ Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy Administration, 40(A), 425-449. doi:10.111
l/j,1467-9515.2006.00497.x Moore, L., Scraton, P. (2014). The incarceration of women: Punishing bodies, breaking spirits. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Moran, D. (2013a). Carcéral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31((), 174-190. doi:10.1068/dl8811 Moran, D. (2013b). Between outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as liminal carcéral spaces. GeoJournal, 78(2), 339-351. doi:10.1007/sl0708-011-9442-6
References 123 Moran, D., Pallot, I, Piacentini, L. (2009). Lipstick, lace, and longing: Constructions of femininity inside a Russian prison. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 700-720. doi: 10.1068/d7808 Navarro, C., Meléndez, A., Cubells, J. (2022). Incarcerated women’s experiences in Spain. Ini. Masson N. Booth (Eds.), Handbook of womens experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 328-339). London: Routledge. Nikartas, S., Tereskinas, A. (2022). Women’s pains of punishment: Experiences of female offenders serving community sentences in Lithuania. Probation Journal, 69(1), 66-85. doi: 10.1177/02645505211069443 OSP (2023). Prison population. Retrieved from https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxwebdv/OSP_OD/ OSP_OD_sociala_likump_tiesas_ likump/SKG090.px/table/tableViewLayoutl/ Oleinik, A. (2003). Organised crime, prison and post-Soviet societies (S. Curtis Trans.). Aldershot: Ashgate. Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Orwell, G. (1987). Animalfarm. London: Random House Publishing Group. Oushakinc, S. (2009). The patriotism of despair: Nation, war, and loss in Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pabjan, B. (2009). Social order in post-communist prisons: The study of prisons in Poland. In A. Renshaw E. Suarez (Eds.), Violent crime and prisons: Population, health conditions and recidivism (pp. 105-146). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Pallot, J. (2015a). The topography of incarceration: The spatial continuity of penality and the legacy of the Gulag in twentieth- and
twenty-first-century Russia. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 7(1), 26-50. Pallot, J. (2015b). The Gulag as the crucible of Russia’s 21 st-century system of punishment. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, /6(3), 681-710. doi:10.1353/ kri.2015.0044 Pallot, J., Katz, E. (2017). Waiting at the prison gate: Women, identity and the Russian penal system. London: LB. Tauris. Pallot, J., Piacentini, L., assisted by Moran, D. (2012). Gender, geography, and pun ishment: The experience of women in carcéral Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Peck, J. (2010). Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state. Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 104-110. doi: 10.1177/1362480609352784 Peck, 1, Tickell, A. T. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 34(3), 380-404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247 Piacentini, L. (2009). Russian prisons: Bringing a riddle out of hiding. eSharp Special Issue: Critical Issues in Researching Hidden Communities, 74-98. Piacentini, L. (2013). Burden or benefit? Paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2240927 Piacentini, L., Katz, E. (2018). The virtual reality of imprisonment: The impact of social media on prisoner agency and prison structure in Russian prisons. Onati SocioLegal Series, 8(2), 183-204. doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0933 Piacentini, L., Katz, E. (2022). The virtual reality of imprisonment in Russia: "Preparing myselffor prison" in a contested human rights landscape. Oxon: Routledge. Piacentini, L., Pallot, J. (2014). Tn exile
imprisonment’ in Russia. British Journal of Criminology, 54(\), 20-37. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt062 Piacentini, L., Pallot, J., Moran, D. (2009). Welcome to malaya rodina (Tittle home land’): Gender and penal order in a Russian penal colony. Social Legal Studies, 18(4), 523-542. doi: 10.1177/0964663909345097 Piacentini, L., Slade, G. (2015). Architecture and attachment: Carcéral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 179-197. doi: 10.1177/1362480615571791
124 References Platek, Μ. (2004). Hostages of destiny: Gender issues in today’s Poland. Feminist Review, 76(1), 5-25. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400140 Player, E. (2014). Women in thecriminaljusticesystem:The triumph of inertia. Criminology Criminal Justice, 14(3), 276-297. doi:10.1177/1748895813495218 Poe, Μ. T. (2003). The Russian moment in world history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pollack, S. (2008). Locked in and locked out: Imprisoning women in the shrinking and punitive welfare state. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University. Porteous, H. (2018). ‘A woman isn’t a woman when she’s not concerned about the way she looks’: Beauty labour and femininity in post-Soviet Russia. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 413^128). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Rawlinson, P. (2010). A Russian tale of crime from fear to fraternity economy and modernity. London: Pluto Press. Rhodes, L. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. California, CA: University of California Press. Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of society: Revised new century edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Rowe, A. (2011). Narratives of self and identity in women’s prisons: Stigma and the struggle for self-definition in penal regimes. Punishment Society, 13(5), 571-591. doi:10.1177/1462474511422151 Rozenbergs, J. (2012, April 27-28). On some developments in Latvian criminal law and criminal procedure. Paper presented at the European Criminal Bar Association Spring Conference,
Geneva. Runcis, Μ., Zalkalns, L. (2018). Women’s role in the alternative culture movements in Soviet Latvia, 1960-1990. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 365-380). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Saad, G. (2007). The evolutionary bases of consumption. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press. Sack, R. (2003). A geographical guide to the real and the good. London: Routledge. Sakwa, R. (2022). The end of endism. New Perspectives, 30(4), 384-388. doi: 10.1177/2336825x221132937 Scharff, C. (2016). Gender and neoliberalism: Young women as ideal neoliberal subjects. In S. Springer, K. Birch, J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 217-226). London: Routledge. Schinkel, Μ. (2015). Adaptation, the meaning of imprisonment and outcomes after release: The impact of the prison regime. Prison Service Journal (219), 24-29. Schliehe, A., Crewe, B. (2022). Top bunk, bottom bunk: Cellsharing in prisons. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(2), 484-500. doi:10.1093/bjc/azab053 Scott, D. (2015). Walking amongst the graves of the living: Reflections about doing prison research from an abolitionist perspective. In D. H. Drake, R. Earle J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook ofprison ethnography (pp. 40-58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Scott, D., Codd, H. (2010). Controversial issues in prisons. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Shafarevich, I. (1975). Socialism in our past and future. In A. I. Solzhenitsyn, Μ. Agursky, E. Barabanov, V. Borisov, K. Korsakov, I. Shafarevich (Eds.), From under the rub ble (pp.
26-66) (Μ. Scammell, Trans.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. Shamir, R. (2005). Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 197-217. doi:10.111 l/j.0735-2751.2005.00250.x Sharpe, G. (2015). Precarious identities: ‘Young’ motherhood, desistance and stigma. Criminology Criminal Justice, 15(4), 407-422. doi: 10.1177/1748895815572163 Sibley, D., Van Hoven, B. (2009). The contamination of personal space: Boundary construc tion in a prison environment. Area, 41(2), 198-206. doi:10.1111/j. 14754762.2008.00855.x
References 125 Simon, J., Sparks, R. (2013). Punishment and society: The emergence of an academic field. In J. Simon R. Sparks (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of punishment and society (pp. 120). London: SAGE. Slade, G. (2018). Unpacking prison reform in the former Soviet Union. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies, 19. doi:10.4000/pipss.5242 Slade, G., Light, Μ. (2015). Crime and criminal justice after communism: Why study the post-Soviet region?. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 147-158. doi:10.1177/1362480615571724 Slade, G., Vaiciuniene, R. (2018). In comparative perspective: The effects of incarcera tion abroad on penal subjectivity among prisoners in Lithuania. European Journal of Criminology, 15(2), 217-234. doi:10.1 177/1477370817726716 Solomon, P. H.(2015). Post-Soviet criminal justice: The persistence of distorted neoinquisitorialism. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 159-178. doi:10.1177/1362480614568746 Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1974). The Gulag archipelago (T. P. Whitney, Trans.), Vols. 1-2. New York, NY: Harper Row. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1975). As breathing and consciousness return. In A. I. Solzhenitsyn, Μ. Agursky, E. Barabanov, V. Borisov, K. Korsakov, I. Shafarevich (Eds.), From under the rubble (pp. 3-25) (Μ. Scammell, Trans.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (2007). The Gulag archipelago, 1918-1956: An experiment in literary investigation (H. Willetts, Trans.), Vol. 3. London: Harper Row. Sparks, R., Bottoms, A. E., Hay, W. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Stivrenieks, Μ. (2023).
Vadîbas komentâri par paveikto un turpmäkajiem pläniem [Management comments on what has been done and future plans]. Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment Stoop, L. (2021). Director’s statements. Retrieved from https://www.ostrov.ch/ pressdownloads?file=files/Files/Ostrov/211101_Pressekit_Ostrov_ENG.pdf Sudbury, J. (2005). Global lockdown: Race, gender and the prison-industrial complex. Oxon: Routledge. Sykes, G. Μ. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Symkovych, A. (2017). The Ukrainian response to Sykes: Prisoner hierarchy and self rule -power, legitimacy, and dynamics. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(5), 1087-1106. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azx076 Symkovych, A. (2018). Negative visibility and‘the defences of the weak’: The interplay of a managerial culture and prisoner resistance. Theoretical Criminology, 24(2), 202-221. doi:10.1177/1362480618779404 The Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. (2019). The history of the occupation of Latvia. Riga: The Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. The World Prison Brief. (2023). Latvia. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/ country/latvia Tolokonnikova, N., Zizek, S. (2014). Comradely greetings: The prison letters of Nadya and Slavoj (I. Dreiblatt Trans.). London: Verso. Toohey, J.-A. (2022). Out of sight, out of mind: The incarceration of cognitively disabled women in Australian prisons. In I. Masson N. Booth (Eds.), Handbook of womens experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 314-327). London: Routledge. Turner, J. (2016).
The prison boundary between society and carcéral space. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Vaiciuniene, R., Tereskinas, A. (2017). Transformations in prison subculture and adjust ment to imprisonment in post-Soviet Lithuanian penitentiary institutions. East European Politics and Societies, 31(3), 659-679. doi: 10.1177/0888325417711221 Vaiciuniene, R., Jalili Idrissi, A., Tereskinas, A. (2022). Carcéral collectivism and incar cerated women’s experiences in Lithuania and Latvia. In I. Masson N. Booth
126 References (Eds.), Handbook of women's experiences in criminaljustice (pp. 352-363). London: Routledge. Vander Beken, T. (2017). Learning from carcéral tours: Reflections after a Howard tour across Europe. In T. Daems L. Robert (Eds.), Europe in prisons: Assessing the impact of European institutions on national prison systems (pp. 79-101). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Vannier, Μ. (2020). Caught between a rock and a hard place-human rights, life imprison ment and gender stereotyping: A critical analysis of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik V. Russia. In S. Walklate, K. Fitz-Gibbon, J. McCulloch, J. Maher (Eds.), The Emerald handbook offeminism, criminology and social change (pp. 271-287). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Varese, F. (2002). The Russian mafia: Private protection in a new market economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Vavokhine, Y. (2004). The (post)-soviet prison subculture faced with the use of selfmanage ment doctrines by the corrections administration. Penal Field, I, I -15. doi:I0.4000/ champpcnal.399 Wacquant, L. (2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incar ceration. Ethnography, 3(4), 371-397. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. London: Duke University Press. Walker, S., Annison, 1, Beckett, S. (2019). Transforming rehabilitation: The impact of austerity and privatisation on day-to-day cultures and working practices in ‘proba tion’. Probation Journal, 66(1), 113-130. doi: 10.1177/0264550518820670 Walmsley, R. (2005). Prisons in Central and Eastern Europe. HEUN1,
Paper No. 22. Retrieved fromhttp://old.heuni.fi/en/index/publications/heunipapers/heunipapers22. prisonsincentralandeasterneurope.html West, C. (1991). The ethical dimensions of Marxist thought. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. Whitehead, P., Crawshaw, P. (2013). Shaking the foundations: On the moral economy of criminal justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 588-604. doi: 10.1093/ bjc/azt016 Whyte, D., Wiegratz, J. (2016). Neoliberalism and the moral economy offraud. London: Routledge. Yakunin, V. (2013). Thinking communally. In P. Dutkiewicz R. Sakwa (Eds.), 22 Ideas to fix the world: Conversations with the world’s foremost thinkers (pp. 150-165). New York, NY: New York University Press. Zahars, V. (2005). Notiesâtie - tauta tautâ: kriminälsodu izpildes problëmas [Convicted people - A nation within a nation: Problems with enforcement of punishment). Riga: Zvaigzne ABC. Zake, I. (2002). Gendered political subjectivity in post-soviet Latvia. Womens Studies International Forum, 25(6), 631-640. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00341-2 Zedner, L. (1998). Wayward sisters the prison for women. In N. Morris D. J. Rothman (Eds.), The Oxford history of the prison: The practice of punishment in Western soci ety (pp. 295-324). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zilinskiene, L. (2018). Women’s social adaptation models in Soviet Lithuania. In Μ. Ilic (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of women and gender in twentieth-century Russia and the Soviet Union (pp. 315-330). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Zinoviev, A. (1986). Homo Sovieticus. Boston, MA: Atlantic Monthly Press. Zizek, S. (2011).
Living in the end times. London: Verso. Zlatkovska, I. (2023). Sogad uz sarunu aicinam Ilguciema cietuma prieksnieci pulkvedi Innu Zlatkovsku un Valmieras cietuma prieksnieku pulkvedi Andri Baski [Inviting for this year’s interview the Governor of Ilguciems prison Colonel Innu Zlatkovsku and the Governor of Valmiera prison Colonel Andri Baski] (pp. 10-27). Retrieved from https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/media/5430/download7attachment
Index Abstract universal altruism, 16 Abuse, 6, 18,44, 55,65, 112 Agency, 27, 29-30,42,44-45, 52, 55, 112 Ancillary services, 8 Aristocrats, 9 Artificial collectivism, 16 Assessment Commission (the Commission), 68-69 Austerity, 8 Authoritarian prison regime, 53 Authoritative coercive power, 95 Authority (dynamic, criminal, political, legitimate), 4, 11, 18,48-50, 62-63, 86-87, 89,93, 107-108 Beauty labour, 46 Berlin Wall, 17 Borderless neoliberal ethos, 5 Bureaucratic gaze, 58-60 Business development, 18 Camps, 11 Capitalism (gangster capitalism), 5, 7 Capitalist system, 5, 9 Carcéral collectivism, 4, 36-37, 81 Carcéral geography, 1, 29 Carcéral space, 29 constrained in space and time, 37-39 creation of place, 42-45 entering, 32-33 gender-specific ‘gentrification’ of place, 45-48 geographical presence, 30-32 places of ‘difference’, 48-52 prison as factory, 39^42 spatial particularities of prison site, 33-37 Care, 96-99 Career criminals, 87 Central Statistical Bureau (CSB), 23 Checkpoints. 39 Children's camps, 11 Class, 13 Code of conduct, 85 Coercion-induced obedience and submission, 70 Coercive power, 16, 32 Collapse of values, 83 day-to-day prisoner-staff relationships, 94-96 discipline, care, and punishment, 96-99 incarcerated women, 104 new moral economy of vulnerability, 99-102 snitch zone, 92-94 social mobility, 105 Soviet ‘authoritarian welfare state’, 106 Soviet celebrations and festivities, 102 Soviet legacy, 107 transformation of informal rules and social structures, 84-92 Collective penal self-governance, 112 Collective punishments, 60, 112 Collective
responsibility, 60 Collectivity, 111-112 Colonies, 13 Communication, 96 Communism, 6, 10, 12, 20,41, 75 Community, 3 service, 23 Comradery, 3 Conjugal visits, 48^49 Consumerism, 11 Cooperation, 93
128 Index Coping mechanisms, 71 Council of Europe, 1-2, 23, 110 Courses, 62, 71-72, 76 Creation of place, 42-45 Crime, 8 Crime control, 8 Criminal and political camps, 11 Criminal authority, 86 Criminal justice, 7 business model application in, 8 Crisis (of being/economic), 19 Cultural criminology, 1 Cultural empowerment, 18 Custody (women in custody), 21-26 Cyclical downturns, 8 Day-to-day prisoner-staff relationships, 94-96 Democratic institutions, 23 Discipline, 96-99 Disempowerment, 53, 59 Domino effect, 8 Dormitory, 45, 50, 85,92 Double isolation, 25-26 Drugs, 54, 101 Dynamic authority, 63 Early release, 66-70 Ecis V Latvia (2019), 25 Economic crisis, 8 Economy (market/command), 1-2, 9, 11-12,17, 20,42, 76-77, 92, 108-109 Economy, efficiency, and effectiveness (three E’s), 6 Education, 3, 36, 72, 74,99, 105 Entitlements, 50, 54, 76, 81, 111 European approach, 23 European Convention on Human Rights, 110 European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 25 European Institute for Gender Equality (2022), 110 European Union (EU), 2 Factory work, 55 Family, 14, 38,42, 60, 66-67, 77. 86, 97, 108 Family Code, 14 Family ties, 77 Feminism, 1, 29 Fieldwork, 27, 38. 51, 68-69, 84-86, 96, 104 Financial resources, 42, 54, 76, 81, 111 Food parcels, 77 Forced labour camps, 13 Former Soviet Union (FSU), 1- 3 Free market, 19 G4S, 8 Gangster capitalism, 18, 26, 109 Gender equality, 15-16, 24, 110 Gender Equality Index, 110 Gender gap, 24 Gender oppression/pains, 2,7,14-15, 110 Gender ratio problem, 24,26 Gender-specific 'gentrification' of place, 30,45-48 Gendered cultural expectations, 52
Gendered measures, 26 Gendered roles, 14 and responsibilities, 7, 18, 109 Geographical presence, 30-32 Globalisation of capital, 24 Gulag system, 11-12 Hard power, 1, 53, 84 Hidden hierarchies, 83 Hierarchy(ies), 14, 83-85, 87-89, 96, 108 Homo (consumericus/sovieticus/neoSovieticus), 10, 10/z3, 19 Human factor, 62 Human rights (Europen Convention of Human Rights/Europen Court of Human Rights ECtHR), 25, 54, 59, 110, 112 Humankind, 9
Index Ideological context, 27 Ideologies, 5 difference to sameness, 13-16 ‘ins and outs’ of neoliberal project, 6-9 soviet grip, 9-13 Illusory collective solidarity, 16 Imprisonment, 27, 53 bureaucratic gaze and 'responsibilisation' in action, 58-60 pains, 29 prison regime, 76-81 prison regime under ‘new rules’, 57-58 resocialisation via gendered activities, 70-76 rule compliance, incentives, and final reward of early release, 66—70 synopticon and checks and balances in place, 61-63 in transition, 54-57 ‘In exile’imprisonment, 12 Incarcerated women, 30,42^43, 66, 88 Incentives, 66-70 Individual (freedoms, self-interests, accountability), 3, 7-10, 15-16, 20, 50, 53,57, 60, 62, 74, 93, 101, 104-105 Individualisation and individual (freedoms, self-interests, accountability), 53,81,90,107 Individualism, 111 Induction, 49 Industrialisation, 9 Inequality, 8, 20 Informal ‘laws’, 84 Informal rules, 83 Internal informers system, 83 International bodies, 1-2 Irrationality of rationality, 6 Keeping busy, 70, 76 Kids, 32, 66,81,98, 105 Kitchen, 47, 65, 77, 89 129 Labour camps, 11 Latvian penal system, 111 Latvian Prison Administration, 111 Latvian prisons, 21 Law breaking, 25 Legal and penal reforms, 1-2 Legitimacy, 62, 70 ‘Less eligibility’ principle, 35 Liberal democracy (democracy), 3, 17 Liberty, 20-21, 55, 59 Liminal carcéral spaces, 49 Liquid modernity, 111 Local neolibcralisms, 5 ‘Managerial’ ethos, 6 Market economy, 17 transition process, 21-26 women's experiences, 27 Marketisation, 77 Marxism, 5, 9 political doctrine, 40 practice, 15 tenets, 14 Marxist utopian vision, 10
Marxist-Leninist doctrines, 10 Material context, 27 Materialistic values, 111 Maternal mandate, 26, 65 Matryoshka, 4 McDonaldisation model of society, 6-7 McJustice, 6-7 Military discipline and protocol, 95 Mobilitarian ideology, 53-54, 65, 70 Monuments, 109 Moral economy (of vulnerability), 99-102 Motherhood, 50 National identity, recreation of, 18 Neo-inquisitorialism, 51 Neo-sovietism, 113 Neofeudalism, 110 Neoliberal economic reforms, 7 Neoliberal project, 5 ins and outs of, 6-9
130 Index Neoliberalism (neoliberal project), 2, 5,8, НО New Criminal Law, 22 New moral economy of vulnerability, 99-102 Nostalgia, 3, 84 Obedience, 59 Offsite work, 55 Old style’ military discipline, 95 Operational power, 63 Organised crime groups, 18 Orthodox Church, 11 Pains of imprisonment, 37 Penal culture, 112 Penal geography, 30 Penal institutions, 3, 7 Penal philosophy, 39-40 Penal power, 1, 46 Penal regimes, 2 Penal system, 110 Personal deficiencies, 73 Personal hygiene, 47 Phone calls, 77 Phone charges, 77 Place creation, 42-45 Places of ‘différence’, 48-52 Political power, 16 Polyopticon, 92 Post-Soviet societies, 113 Power (soft/hard), 1-2, 53, 56-58, 84, 95, 98, 107, 112-113 Preoccupation, 99 Prevailing uncertainty, 111 Prison regime, 53, 76-81 under ‘new rules’, 57-58 Prison staff, 38,41, 47, 54-55, 89, 112 in male prisons, 66 Prison/living conditions, 12, 36, 46, 50 Prison’s ‘oasis’, 50 Prisoners, 12, 87 contingent, 75 hierarchies, 83-84 Prisons, 13, 53, 109 administration, 33-34, 45-46, 56, 59, 99, 112 estate, 55 as factory, 39-42 industrial complex, 8, 15 labour, 12 layout and design, 52 life, 29 management, 8 officers, 96 population, 22, 26 researchers, 4 rules, 22-23,44, 56, 58, 94 school, 50 space, 29,45 Privileges, 4, 22, 26, 54 Procedural context, 27 Programmes, 23, 54,70, 72-73, 76 Progression, 4, 53-54, 57, 59, 67-70, 81 Progressive stage system, 57 Proletarian revolution, 9 Public institution placement, 6 Punishment, 32, 53, 96-99, 111 camps, 11 Radical historicist approach, 9 Radical pro-corporate agenda, 6 Recorded crime, 23 “Refeminisation” of
inmates, 72 Rehabilitation, 72 Relationships-for-intelligence, 79 Remand, 24-25, 32, 37, 50-51, 57, 69, 77, 100 Resilience of ‘carcéral collectivism’, 112 Resocialisation via gendered activities, 70-76 process, 47 Respect, 62,91,95, 112 Responsibilisation in action, 58-60 Revolutionary iconography, 14 Rights-based approach, 1, 84
Index Risk (of reoffending/management/ agenda/assessment), 6, 53-54, 59,66, 80, 102, 107 Rule compliance, 66-70 Russian autocracy, 11 Russian history and culture, 9 Russian language, 111 Russian male penal subcultures, 86 Russian salad, 75 School graduation ceremony, 74 Second-class citizenship within male institutions, 26 Security (high/low), 25, 34, 37, 50, 57, 65 Self-harm, 99 Self-interests, 111 Self-regulation, 90 Sentence Execution Code of Latvia, 25-26 Sentencing patterns, 24 Serco, 8 Sex offenders, 89 Shock doctrine, 6 Simplicity, 3 Slave labour, 15 Snitch zone, 92-94 Social mobility, 105 Socialism, 2, 11 Societal waste, 35 Society, 53 Sociology of imprisonment, 1, 29 Soft power, 1, 53, 84 Solidarity, 9 Solitary confinement, 64, 89 Soviet approach, 84 Soviet celebrations and festivities, 102 Soviet ideology (Soviet project), 2-3 Soviet imprisonment, 39-40 Soviet legacy, 20, 29, 39, 80, 107 aspects, 30 Soviet Penal Code, 12 Soviet people, 10 Soviet power, 13 Soviet prison regime, core element of, 55 131 Soviet project, 5-6, 9, 13 breakdown, 19-20 ideological framework and collapse, 53 Soviet romanticism/nostalgia, 84, 109 Soviet system, 11,14 Soviet times, 3, 30, 34, 39—41,47, 56, 70, 74-75,81,84-85, 103, 107, 111 Soviet-style bench, 31-32 Soviet-style socialism, 5 Spataliscd technologies, 113 Spatial arrangements, 38-39 Spatial particularities of prison site, 33-37 Special custodial provisions, 26 State enemies, 12 State’s administrative institutions, 101 Suicides, 99 ‘Surplus’ labour force, 8 Synopticon and checks and balances in place, 61-63 Thieves in law, 85-86,
88, 91 Three strikes policy, 65 Time and gendered cultural assumptions, 2 Togetherness, 111-112 Totalitarian regime, 92 Transformation of informal rules and social structures, 84—92 Transit camps, 11 Transition process, 2, 21-26 True believers, 19-20 Tsarist regime, 9 Tuberculosis (ТВ), 21 Two-tier ‘justice’ system, 7 Universalisation of Western liberal democracy, 17 Values, 2-4, 6, 9-11, 15, 19-20, 27,40, 45-46, 50-51,53, 63, 76, 81, 84, 104, 107, 109, 111, 113
132 Index Violence (structural/physical/ symbolic/intimate partner), 13, 18-19, 37, 44, 48, 55, 64, 73, 90, 99, 109, 112 Visitors, 31-33, 66, 76-77 Women, 2, 7 camps, 11 imprisonment, 26 in Latvia, 59 Work, 40 of probation, 101 Western liberal democracy, 3 Western style neoliberalism, 17 Zek(a), 85 Zone, 38 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Jalili-Idrissi, Arta |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1318397057 |
| author_facet | Jalili-Idrissi, Arta |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Jalili-Idrissi, Arta |
| author_variant | a j i aji |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049497483 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1422403227 (DE-599)BVBBV049497483 |
| edition | First edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049497483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240410</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240112s2024 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781801172837</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-80117-283-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1422403227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049497483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jalili-Idrissi, Arta</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1318397057</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe</subfield><subfield code="b">'sitting out time'</subfield><subfield code="c">by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bingley, U.K.</subfield><subfield code="b">Emerald Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">132 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emerald studies in criminology, feminism and social change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index. - Includes bibliographical references. - Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The field of prison studies has been dominated by an androcentric outlook, with little attention paid to women. Offering a unique theoretical fusion of the sociology of imprisonment, carceral geography, feminism and cultural criminology, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' examines how social, political, and cultural factors have shaped the development of gendered penal regimes in Eastern Europe and created an institutional battleground for opposing ideologies. Expanding from Latvia as a focal point, Arta Jalili Idrissi provides a current snapshot of women's imprisonment across the Global East. Understanding the situated and complex nature of the prison as an institution, she captures the interplay between the Soviet legacy and a neoliberal agenda within three distinct realms of punishment: spatial, procedural and relational. Revealing clashes within the prison environment, as well as their broader socio-political and ideological contexts, Jalili Idrissi also exposes the specific nuances of gender implications. The first qualitative study based on an ethnographic approach to women's carceral experiences in Latvia, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' draws parallels across Eastern Europe and throughout the neoliberal West to provide a refreshing and timely addition to the study of criminology and the sociology of imprisonment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Weibliche Gefangene</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4230270-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafvollzug</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057808-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Justizvollzugsanstalt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073137-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Osteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075739-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lettland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074187-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sowjetunion</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077548-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Women prisoners / Europe, Eastern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Imprisonment / Europe, Eastern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Science ; Criminology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prisons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Osteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075739-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sowjetunion</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077548-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Lettland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074187-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Strafvollzug</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057808-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justizvollzugsanstalt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4073137-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Weibliche Gefangene</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4230270-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe. epub</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-80117-284-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, online</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-80117-282-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20240410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">305.309</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">305.309</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034842686</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 gnd Lettland (DE-588)4074187-4 gnd Sowjetunion (DE-588)4077548-3 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Osteuropa Lettland Sowjetunion |
| id | DE-604.BV049497483 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:20:39Z |
| indexdate | 2024-08-10T01:32:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781801172837 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034842686 |
| oclc_num | 1422403227 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 132 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20240410 |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Emerald Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Emerald studies in criminology, feminism and social change |
| spelling | Jalili-Idrissi, Arta Verfasser (DE-588)1318397057 aut Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK) First edition Bingley, U.K. Emerald Publishing 2024 132 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Emerald studies in criminology, feminism and social change Includes index. - Includes bibliographical references. - Print version record The field of prison studies has been dominated by an androcentric outlook, with little attention paid to women. Offering a unique theoretical fusion of the sociology of imprisonment, carceral geography, feminism and cultural criminology, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' examines how social, political, and cultural factors have shaped the development of gendered penal regimes in Eastern Europe and created an institutional battleground for opposing ideologies. Expanding from Latvia as a focal point, Arta Jalili Idrissi provides a current snapshot of women's imprisonment across the Global East. Understanding the situated and complex nature of the prison as an institution, she captures the interplay between the Soviet legacy and a neoliberal agenda within three distinct realms of punishment: spatial, procedural and relational. Revealing clashes within the prison environment, as well as their broader socio-political and ideological contexts, Jalili Idrissi also exposes the specific nuances of gender implications. The first qualitative study based on an ethnographic approach to women's carceral experiences in Latvia, Women's Imprisonment in Eastern Europe: 'Sitting out Time' draws parallels across Eastern Europe and throughout the neoliberal West to provide a refreshing and timely addition to the study of criminology and the sociology of imprisonment Weibliche Gefangene (DE-588)4230270-5 gnd rswk-swf Strafvollzug (DE-588)4057808-2 gnd rswk-swf Justizvollzugsanstalt (DE-588)4073137-6 gnd rswk-swf Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 gnd rswk-swf Lettland (DE-588)4074187-4 gnd rswk-swf Sowjetunion (DE-588)4077548-3 gnd rswk-swf Women prisoners / Europe, Eastern Imprisonment / Europe, Eastern Social Science ; Criminology Prisons Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 g Sowjetunion (DE-588)4077548-3 g Lettland (DE-588)4074187-4 g Strafvollzug (DE-588)4057808-2 s Justizvollzugsanstalt (DE-588)4073137-6 s Weibliche Gefangene (DE-588)4230270-5 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe. epub 978-1-80117-284-4 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, online 978-1-80117-282-0 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
| spellingShingle | Jalili-Idrissi, Arta Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' Weibliche Gefangene (DE-588)4230270-5 gnd Strafvollzug (DE-588)4057808-2 gnd Justizvollzugsanstalt (DE-588)4073137-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4230270-5 (DE-588)4057808-2 (DE-588)4073137-6 (DE-588)4075739-0 (DE-588)4074187-4 (DE-588)4077548-3 |
| title | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' |
| title_auth | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' |
| title_exact_search | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' |
| title_full | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK) |
| title_fullStr | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe 'sitting out time' by Arta Jalili Idrissi (Staffordshire University, UK) |
| title_short | Women's imprisonment in Eastern Europe |
| title_sort | women s imprisonment in eastern europe sitting out time |
| title_sub | 'sitting out time' |
| topic | Weibliche Gefangene (DE-588)4230270-5 gnd Strafvollzug (DE-588)4057808-2 gnd Justizvollzugsanstalt (DE-588)4073137-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Weibliche Gefangene Strafvollzug Justizvollzugsanstalt Osteuropa Lettland Sowjetunion |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034842686&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jaliliidrissiarta womensimprisonmentineasterneuropesittingouttime |