Off the Mark: How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) /
Amid widespread concern that our approach to testing and grading undermines education, two experts explain how schools can use assessment to support, rather than compromise, learning.Anyone who has ever crammed for a test, capitulated to a grade-grubbing student, or fretted over a child's repor...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, MA :
Harvard University Press
[2023]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | Amid widespread concern that our approach to testing and grading undermines education, two experts explain how schools can use assessment to support, rather than compromise, learning.Anyone who has ever crammed for a test, capitulated to a grade-grubbing student, or fretted over a child's report card knows that the way we assess student learning in American schools is freighted with unintended consequences. But that's not all. As experts agree, our primary assessment technologies-grading, rating, and ranking-don't actually provide an accurate picture of how students are doing in school. Worse, they distort student and educator behavior in ways that undermine learning and exacerbate inequality. Yet despite widespread dissatisfaction, grades, test scores, and transcripts remain the currency of the realm.In Off the Mark, Jack Schneider and Ethan Hutt explain how we got into this predicament, why we remain beholden to our outmoded forms of assessment, and what we can do to change course. As they make clear, most current attempts at reform won't solve the complex problems we face. Instead, Schneider and Hutt offer a range of practical reforms, like embracing multiple measures of performance and making the so-called permanent record "overwritable." As they explain, we can remake our approach in ways that better advance the three different purposes that assessment currently serves: motivating students to learn, communicating meaningful information about what young people know and can do, and synchronizing an otherwise fragmented educational system. Written in an accessible style for a broad audience, Off the Mark is a guide for everyone who wants to ensure that assessment serves the fundamental goal of education-helping students learn |
Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (240 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780674294776 |
DOI: | 10.4159/9780674294776 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049468341 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231215s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780674294776 |9 978-0-674-29477-6 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4159/9780674294776 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780674294776 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049468341 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 371.27/2 |2 23//eng/20230113eng | |
100 | 1 | |a Schneider, Jack |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Off the Mark |b How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |c Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, MA : |b Harvard University Press |c [2023] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2023 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (240 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023) | ||
520 | |a Amid widespread concern that our approach to testing and grading undermines education, two experts explain how schools can use assessment to support, rather than compromise, learning.Anyone who has ever crammed for a test, capitulated to a grade-grubbing student, or fretted over a child's report card knows that the way we assess student learning in American schools is freighted with unintended consequences. But that's not all. As experts agree, our primary assessment technologies-grading, rating, and ranking-don't actually provide an accurate picture of how students are doing in school. Worse, they distort student and educator behavior in ways that undermine learning and exacerbate inequality. Yet despite widespread dissatisfaction, grades, test scores, and transcripts remain the currency of the realm.In Off the Mark, Jack Schneider and Ethan Hutt explain how we got into this predicament, why we remain beholden to our outmoded forms of assessment, and what we can do to change course. As they make clear, most current attempts at reform won't solve the complex problems we face. Instead, Schneider and Hutt offer a range of practical reforms, like embracing multiple measures of performance and making the so-called permanent record "overwritable." As they explain, we can remake our approach in ways that better advance the three different purposes that assessment currently serves: motivating students to learn, communicating meaningful information about what young people know and can do, and synchronizing an otherwise fragmented educational system. Written in an accessible style for a broad audience, Off the Mark is a guide for everyone who wants to ensure that assessment serves the fundamental goal of education-helping students learn | ||
546 | |a In English | ||
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment |2 sh | |
650 | 4 | |a Education and state |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Education |x Aims and objectives | |
650 | 4 | |a Educational accountability | |
650 | 4 | |a Grading and marking (Students) |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Grading and marking (Students) | |
650 | 4 | |a Learning | |
700 | 1 | |a Hutt, Ethan L. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674294776?locatt=mode:legacy |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034813970 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1824508231214432256 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Schneider, Jack |
author_facet | Schneider, Jack |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schneider, Jack |
author_variant | j s js |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049468341 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780674294776 (DE-599)BVBBV049468341 |
dewey-full | 371.27/2 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 371 - Schools and their activities; special education |
dewey-raw | 371.27/2 |
dewey-search | 371.27/2 |
dewey-sort | 3371.27 12 |
dewey-tens | 370 - Education |
discipline | Pädagogik |
discipline_str_mv | Pädagogik |
doi_str_mv | 10.4159/9780674294776 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049468341</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231215s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780674294776</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-674-29477-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4159/9780674294776</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780674294776</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049468341</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">371.27/2</subfield><subfield code="2">23//eng/20230113eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schneider, Jack</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Off the Mark</subfield><subfield code="b">How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) /</subfield><subfield code="c">Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, MA :</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2023]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (240 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amid widespread concern that our approach to testing and grading undermines education, two experts explain how schools can use assessment to support, rather than compromise, learning.Anyone who has ever crammed for a test, capitulated to a grade-grubbing student, or fretted over a child's report card knows that the way we assess student learning in American schools is freighted with unintended consequences. But that's not all. As experts agree, our primary assessment technologies-grading, rating, and ranking-don't actually provide an accurate picture of how students are doing in school. Worse, they distort student and educator behavior in ways that undermine learning and exacerbate inequality. Yet despite widespread dissatisfaction, grades, test scores, and transcripts remain the currency of the realm.In Off the Mark, Jack Schneider and Ethan Hutt explain how we got into this predicament, why we remain beholden to our outmoded forms of assessment, and what we can do to change course. As they make clear, most current attempts at reform won't solve the complex problems we face. Instead, Schneider and Hutt offer a range of practical reforms, like embracing multiple measures of performance and making the so-called permanent record "overwritable." As they explain, we can remake our approach in ways that better advance the three different purposes that assessment currently serves: motivating students to learn, communicating meaningful information about what young people know and can do, and synchronizing an otherwise fragmented educational system. Written in an accessible style for a broad audience, Off the Mark is a guide for everyone who wants to ensure that assessment serves the fundamental goal of education-helping students learn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment</subfield><subfield code="2">sh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education and state</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield><subfield code="x">Aims and objectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grading and marking (Students)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grading and marking (Students)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hutt, Ethan L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674294776?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034813970</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049468341 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T23:16:15Z |
indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:37:20Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780674294776 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034813970 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-Aug4 |
owner_facet | DE-Aug4 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (240 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG |
publishDate | 2023 |
publishDateSearch | 2023 |
publishDateSort | 2023 |
publisher | Harvard University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Schneider, Jack Verfasser aut Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press [2023] © 2023 1 Online-Ressource (240 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023) Amid widespread concern that our approach to testing and grading undermines education, two experts explain how schools can use assessment to support, rather than compromise, learning.Anyone who has ever crammed for a test, capitulated to a grade-grubbing student, or fretted over a child's report card knows that the way we assess student learning in American schools is freighted with unintended consequences. But that's not all. As experts agree, our primary assessment technologies-grading, rating, and ranking-don't actually provide an accurate picture of how students are doing in school. Worse, they distort student and educator behavior in ways that undermine learning and exacerbate inequality. Yet despite widespread dissatisfaction, grades, test scores, and transcripts remain the currency of the realm.In Off the Mark, Jack Schneider and Ethan Hutt explain how we got into this predicament, why we remain beholden to our outmoded forms of assessment, and what we can do to change course. As they make clear, most current attempts at reform won't solve the complex problems we face. Instead, Schneider and Hutt offer a range of practical reforms, like embracing multiple measures of performance and making the so-called permanent record "overwritable." As they explain, we can remake our approach in ways that better advance the three different purposes that assessment currently serves: motivating students to learn, communicating meaningful information about what young people know and can do, and synchronizing an otherwise fragmented educational system. Written in an accessible style for a broad audience, Off the Mark is a guide for everyone who wants to ensure that assessment serves the fundamental goal of education-helping students learn In English EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment sh Education and state United States Education Aims and objectives Educational accountability Grading and marking (Students) United States Grading and marking (Students) Learning Hutt, Ethan L. Sonstige oth https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674294776?locatt=mode:legacy Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Schneider, Jack Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment sh Education and state United States Education Aims and objectives Educational accountability Grading and marking (Students) United States Grading and marking (Students) Learning |
title | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |
title_auth | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |
title_exact_search | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |
title_exact_search_txtP | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |
title_full | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider |
title_fullStr | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider |
title_full_unstemmed | Off the Mark How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / Ethan L. Hutt, Jack Schneider |
title_short | Off the Mark |
title_sort | off the mark how grades ratings and rankings undermine learning but don t have to |
title_sub | How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don't Have To) / |
topic | EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment sh Education and state United States Education Aims and objectives Educational accountability Grading and marking (Students) United States Grading and marking (Students) Learning |
topic_facet | EDUCATION / Evaluation & Assessment Education and state United States Education Aims and objectives Educational accountability Grading and marking (Students) United States Grading and marking (Students) Learning |
url | https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674294776?locatt=mode:legacy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderjack offthemarkhowgradesratingsandrankingsunderminelearningbutdonthaveto AT huttethanl offthemarkhowgradesratingsandrankingsunderminelearningbutdonthaveto |