Inoculation Theory and Misinformation:
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Riga [Latvia]
NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence
2021
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The spread of false and misleading information both online and offline poses a threat to the wellbeing of individuals, democratic institutions, and societies around the world (1, 2). The harmful consequences of the spread of false and/ or misleading information can be seen in the proliferation of anti-vax groups on Facebook (3, 4), lack of confidence in the science of climate change (5), acts of vandalism committed on the basis of false conspiracy theories about COVID-19 (6, 7), and its influence on the exacerbation of radicalisation and polarisation (8, 9). However, a lack of consensus with respect to what constitutes "misinformation" (for example: focusing exclusively on false information is problematic because truth value can be difficult to determine objectively, and misleading and/or hyperpartisan content may significantly outweigh "fake news", see 10) and disagreement about the efficacy of various efforts to mitigate the spread of misinformation through algorithms, legislation, or content moderation means that no single intervention is likely to be sufficient (11, 12). In this report, we explore the role that psychology and behavioural science can play in the mitigation of online misinformation. To do so, we first discuss how to define "misinformation", and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as "disinformation" and "fake news" |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (22 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9789934564499 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049450383 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231204s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789934564499 |9 978-9934-564-49-9 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1075766 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1414545922 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049450383 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
264 | 1 | |a Riga [Latvia] |b NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence |c 2021 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2021 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (22 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The spread of false and misleading information both online and offline poses a threat to the wellbeing of individuals, democratic institutions, and societies around the world (1, 2). The harmful consequences of the spread of false and/ or misleading information can be seen in the proliferation of anti-vax groups on Facebook (3, 4), lack of confidence in the science of climate change (5), acts of vandalism committed on the basis of false conspiracy theories about COVID-19 (6, 7), and its influence on the exacerbation of radicalisation and polarisation (8, 9). However, a lack of consensus with respect to what constitutes "misinformation" (for example: focusing exclusively on false information is problematic because truth value can be difficult to determine objectively, and misleading and/or hyperpartisan content may significantly outweigh "fake news", see 10) and disagreement about the efficacy of various efforts to mitigate the spread of misinformation through algorithms, legislation, or content moderation means that no single intervention is likely to be sufficient (11, 12). In this report, we explore the role that psychology and behavioural science can play in the mitigation of online misinformation. To do so, we first discuss how to define "misinformation", and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as "disinformation" and "fake news" | ||
650 | 4 | |a Media studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Politics and communication | |
650 | 4 | |a Health and medicine and law | |
650 | 4 | |a ICT Information and Communications Technologies | |
700 | 1 | |a Roozenbeek, Jon |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a van der Linden, Sander |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-9934-564-44-4 |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034796279 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=1075766 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804186214454001664 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049450383 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1075766 (OCoLC)1414545922 (DE-599)BVBBV049450383 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02823nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049450383</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231204s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789934564499</subfield><subfield code="9">978-9934-564-49-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1075766</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1414545922</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049450383</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inoculation Theory and Misinformation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Riga [Latvia]</subfield><subfield code="b">NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (22 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The spread of false and misleading information both online and offline poses a threat to the wellbeing of individuals, democratic institutions, and societies around the world (1, 2). The harmful consequences of the spread of false and/ or misleading information can be seen in the proliferation of anti-vax groups on Facebook (3, 4), lack of confidence in the science of climate change (5), acts of vandalism committed on the basis of false conspiracy theories about COVID-19 (6, 7), and its influence on the exacerbation of radicalisation and polarisation (8, 9). However, a lack of consensus with respect to what constitutes "misinformation" (for example: focusing exclusively on false information is problematic because truth value can be difficult to determine objectively, and misleading and/or hyperpartisan content may significantly outweigh "fake news", see 10) and disagreement about the efficacy of various efforts to mitigate the spread of misinformation through algorithms, legislation, or content moderation means that no single intervention is likely to be sufficient (11, 12). In this report, we explore the role that psychology and behavioural science can play in the mitigation of online misinformation. To do so, we first discuss how to define "misinformation", and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as "disinformation" and "fake news"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Media studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics and communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Health and medicine and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ICT Information and Communications Technologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roozenbeek, Jon</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van der Linden, Sander</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-9934-564-44-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034796279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=1075766</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049450383 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T23:12:57Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:07:34Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789934564499 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034796279 |
oclc_num | 1414545922 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (22 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation Riga [Latvia] NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence 2021 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2021 1 Online-Ressource (22 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The spread of false and misleading information both online and offline poses a threat to the wellbeing of individuals, democratic institutions, and societies around the world (1, 2). The harmful consequences of the spread of false and/ or misleading information can be seen in the proliferation of anti-vax groups on Facebook (3, 4), lack of confidence in the science of climate change (5), acts of vandalism committed on the basis of false conspiracy theories about COVID-19 (6, 7), and its influence on the exacerbation of radicalisation and polarisation (8, 9). However, a lack of consensus with respect to what constitutes "misinformation" (for example: focusing exclusively on false information is problematic because truth value can be difficult to determine objectively, and misleading and/or hyperpartisan content may significantly outweigh "fake news", see 10) and disagreement about the efficacy of various efforts to mitigate the spread of misinformation through algorithms, legislation, or content moderation means that no single intervention is likely to be sufficient (11, 12). In this report, we explore the role that psychology and behavioural science can play in the mitigation of online misinformation. To do so, we first discuss how to define "misinformation", and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as "disinformation" and "fake news" Media studies Politics and communication Health and medicine and law ICT Information and Communications Technologies Roozenbeek, Jon Sonstige oth van der Linden, Sander Sonstige oth Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-9934-564-44-4 |
spellingShingle | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation Media studies Politics and communication Health and medicine and law ICT Information and Communications Technologies |
title | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_auth | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_exact_search | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_exact_search_txtP | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_full | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_fullStr | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_full_unstemmed | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_short | Inoculation Theory and Misinformation |
title_sort | inoculation theory and misinformation |
topic | Media studies Politics and communication Health and medicine and law ICT Information and Communications Technologies |
topic_facet | Media studies Politics and communication Health and medicine and law ICT Information and Communications Technologies |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roozenbeekjon inoculationtheoryandmisinformation AT vanderlindensander inoculationtheoryandmisinformation AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary inoculationtheoryandmisinformation |