Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Analitika - Centar za društvena istraživanja, sva prava pridržana
2016
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | Recently ranked as the fifth poorest country in Europe by the World Bank, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) faces a number of serious socio-economic challenges. According to World Bank estimates, 17.9% of BiH's population lived below the critical poverty line in 2011. In 2014 the unemployment rate was 27.5%, among the highest in Europe. The gender gap in employment is substantial, with women making up only 37.1% of those employed in 2014. Youth unemployment (ages 15-24) was the highest in Europe and recorded at a rate of 62.7% in 2014. Educational attainment of the working population is low, with 10.1% having completed higher, 48.7% secondary, and 41.2% primary education or lower in 2014. Compounding this poor socio-economic situation, the social protection system in BiH fails to meet the needs of the most disadvantaged among its citizens. Though the country spends 4% of its GDP on the social protection system - a comparatively high amount - only 17% of that funding goes to the population most in need. Estimates indicate that 72% of social benefits 'leak' to persons in far better socioeconomic positions, particularity due to the extraordinarily high level of war veteran benefits. While a large number of people in BiH became unemployed in recent years as a result of deindustrialization, failed privatization measures, and other economic turbulence related to transition to a market economy and postwar reconstruction, social protection has become less effective in responding to the needs of a growing number of social welfare beneficiaries. The current social protection system is marked by a number of deficiencies in both of Bosnia and Herzegovina's entities (Federation of BiH and Republika Srpska) and Brčko District. One of the key problems in the country is inadequate distribution of the available benefits. Numerous studies suggest that adequate protection is lacking for the most vulnerable users and that the allocation of available resources is disproportionate. Most social work centers are overburdened and have inadequate capacities. This is an especially significant problem given that these institutions collect applications, apply the defined criteria, and decide on the allocation of funds in each specific case. Another problem is a lack of campaigns aimed at informing users on their rights by social work centers and other actors in the field. According to a study based on focus groups with beneficiaries of social assistance, they were not aware of their rights under the current system, which is associated with a lack of information provided by the centers for social work. Overly complicated legislation is an additional component which perpetuates the poor condition of the social protection system in the state. Both entities and the district have different laws in force, whereas competences in each entity are further devolved to local levels (cantons and municipalities in FBiH), leading to wide variations in service provision. In FBiH, the main laws regulating social protection are the Law on the Protection of Civilian War Victims, the Law on Protection of Families with Children, the Family Law, and the Framework Law on Social Protection. The latter establishes a minimum level of social support, leaving it to the cantons to adopt specific cantonal laws, which results in significantly different amounts of social assistance benefits in different cantons). In Republika Srpska, as well as in Brčko District, the main laws in the field are the Law on Social Protection, the Law on the Protection of Children, and the Family Law. For one to enter the social protection system(s) in BiH and exercise the right to social assistance one must be assessed as unable to work or have no other sources of income. The system is means-tested and consists of a series of noncontributory rights available to individuals or families. Available contributions include social assistance for the poor and disability benefits and cover various categories of users such as the poor (those receiving permanent social assistance), persons with non-war related disabilities, and civilian war victims. Supervision is performed by the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy in the FBiH, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection in the RS, and the Department for Health and Other Services in Brčko District, while social work centers perform key operational activities in both entities and Brčko District. In recent years, social protection has been on the government agenda in the context of austerity measures and rationalization of public spending, but a serious discussion on what sort of social welfare model BiH needs has yet to take place. Such a discussion seems more relevant than ever, especially as future reforms are targeted at tightening eligibility rules for social assistance based on need, without an emphasis on the development of important social services or other means of securing decent lives for a number of categories of current and future beneficiaries |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049449722 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231204s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1074724 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1414543344 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049449722 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
264 | 1 | |a Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Analitika - Centar za društvena istraživanja, sva prava pridržana |c 2016 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Recently ranked as the fifth poorest country in Europe by the World Bank, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) faces a number of serious socio-economic challenges. According to World Bank estimates, 17.9% of BiH's population lived below the critical poverty line in 2011. In 2014 the unemployment rate was 27.5%, among the highest in Europe. The gender gap in employment is substantial, with women making up only 37.1% of those employed in 2014. Youth unemployment (ages 15-24) was the highest in Europe and recorded at a rate of 62.7% in 2014. Educational attainment of the working population is low, with 10.1% having completed higher, 48.7% secondary, and 41.2% primary education or lower in 2014. Compounding this poor socio-economic situation, the social protection system in BiH fails to meet the needs of the most disadvantaged among its citizens. | ||
500 | |a Though the country spends 4% of its GDP on the social protection system - a comparatively high amount - only 17% of that funding goes to the population most in need. Estimates indicate that 72% of social benefits 'leak' to persons in far better socioeconomic positions, particularity due to the extraordinarily high level of war veteran benefits. While a large number of people in BiH became unemployed in recent years as a result of deindustrialization, failed privatization measures, and other economic turbulence related to transition to a market economy and postwar reconstruction, social protection has become less effective in responding to the needs of a growing number of social welfare beneficiaries. The current social protection system is marked by a number of deficiencies in both of Bosnia and Herzegovina's entities (Federation of BiH and Republika Srpska) and Brčko District. One of the key problems in the country is inadequate distribution of the available benefits. | ||
500 | |a Numerous studies suggest that adequate protection is lacking for the most vulnerable users and that the allocation of available resources is disproportionate. Most social work centers are overburdened and have inadequate capacities. This is an especially significant problem given that these institutions collect applications, apply the defined criteria, and decide on the allocation of funds in each specific case. Another problem is a lack of campaigns aimed at informing users on their rights by social work centers and other actors in the field. According to a study based on focus groups with beneficiaries of social assistance, they were not aware of their rights under the current system, which is associated with a lack of information provided by the centers for social work. Overly complicated legislation is an additional component which perpetuates the poor condition of the social protection system in the state. | ||
500 | |a Both entities and the district have different laws in force, whereas competences in each entity are further devolved to local levels (cantons and municipalities in FBiH), leading to wide variations in service provision. In FBiH, the main laws regulating social protection are the Law on the Protection of Civilian War Victims, the Law on Protection of Families with Children, the Family Law, and the Framework Law on Social Protection. The latter establishes a minimum level of social support, leaving it to the cantons to adopt specific cantonal laws, which results in significantly different amounts of social assistance benefits in different cantons). In Republika Srpska, as well as in Brčko District, the main laws in the field are the Law on Social Protection, the Law on the Protection of Children, and the Family Law. | ||
500 | |a For one to enter the social protection system(s) in BiH and exercise the right to social assistance one must be assessed as unable to work or have no other sources of income. The system is means-tested and consists of a series of noncontributory rights available to individuals or families. Available contributions include social assistance for the poor and disability benefits and cover various categories of users such as the poor (those receiving permanent social assistance), persons with non-war related disabilities, and civilian war victims. Supervision is performed by the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy in the FBiH, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection in the RS, and the Department for Health and Other Services in Brčko District, while social work centers perform key operational activities in both entities and Brčko District. | ||
500 | |a In recent years, social protection has been on the government agenda in the context of austerity measures and rationalization of public spending, but a serious discussion on what sort of social welfare model BiH needs has yet to take place. Such a discussion seems more relevant than ever, especially as future reforms are targeted at tightening eligibility rules for social assistance based on need, without an emphasis on the development of important social services or other means of securing decent lives for a number of categories of current and future beneficiaries | ||
650 | 4 | |a Public Administration | |
650 | 4 | |a Welfare systems | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethnic Minorities Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Socio-Economic Research | |
650 | 4 | |a Labour and Social Security Law | |
700 | 1 | |a Hadžiristić, Tea |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Malkić, Aida |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jusić, Mirna |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hodžić, Edin |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034795618 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=1074724 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804186212496310272 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049449722 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1074724 (OCoLC)1414543344 (DE-599)BVBBV049449722 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06610nmm a2200505zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049449722</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231204s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol1074724</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1414543344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049449722</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Analitika - Centar za društvena istraživanja, sva prava pridržana</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recently ranked as the fifth poorest country in Europe by the World Bank, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) faces a number of serious socio-economic challenges. According to World Bank estimates, 17.9% of BiH's population lived below the critical poverty line in 2011. In 2014 the unemployment rate was 27.5%, among the highest in Europe. The gender gap in employment is substantial, with women making up only 37.1% of those employed in 2014. Youth unemployment (ages 15-24) was the highest in Europe and recorded at a rate of 62.7% in 2014. Educational attainment of the working population is low, with 10.1% having completed higher, 48.7% secondary, and 41.2% primary education or lower in 2014. Compounding this poor socio-economic situation, the social protection system in BiH fails to meet the needs of the most disadvantaged among its citizens. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Though the country spends 4% of its GDP on the social protection system - a comparatively high amount - only 17% of that funding goes to the population most in need. Estimates indicate that 72% of social benefits 'leak' to persons in far better socioeconomic positions, particularity due to the extraordinarily high level of war veteran benefits. While a large number of people in BiH became unemployed in recent years as a result of deindustrialization, failed privatization measures, and other economic turbulence related to transition to a market economy and postwar reconstruction, social protection has become less effective in responding to the needs of a growing number of social welfare beneficiaries. The current social protection system is marked by a number of deficiencies in both of Bosnia and Herzegovina's entities (Federation of BiH and Republika Srpska) and Brčko District. One of the key problems in the country is inadequate distribution of the available benefits. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Numerous studies suggest that adequate protection is lacking for the most vulnerable users and that the allocation of available resources is disproportionate. Most social work centers are overburdened and have inadequate capacities. This is an especially significant problem given that these institutions collect applications, apply the defined criteria, and decide on the allocation of funds in each specific case. Another problem is a lack of campaigns aimed at informing users on their rights by social work centers and other actors in the field. According to a study based on focus groups with beneficiaries of social assistance, they were not aware of their rights under the current system, which is associated with a lack of information provided by the centers for social work. Overly complicated legislation is an additional component which perpetuates the poor condition of the social protection system in the state. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Both entities and the district have different laws in force, whereas competences in each entity are further devolved to local levels (cantons and municipalities in FBiH), leading to wide variations in service provision. In FBiH, the main laws regulating social protection are the Law on the Protection of Civilian War Victims, the Law on Protection of Families with Children, the Family Law, and the Framework Law on Social Protection. The latter establishes a minimum level of social support, leaving it to the cantons to adopt specific cantonal laws, which results in significantly different amounts of social assistance benefits in different cantons). In Republika Srpska, as well as in Brčko District, the main laws in the field are the Law on Social Protection, the Law on the Protection of Children, and the Family Law. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For one to enter the social protection system(s) in BiH and exercise the right to social assistance one must be assessed as unable to work or have no other sources of income. The system is means-tested and consists of a series of noncontributory rights available to individuals or families. Available contributions include social assistance for the poor and disability benefits and cover various categories of users such as the poor (those receiving permanent social assistance), persons with non-war related disabilities, and civilian war victims. Supervision is performed by the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy in the FBiH, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection in the RS, and the Department for Health and Other Services in Brčko District, while social work centers perform key operational activities in both entities and Brčko District. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, social protection has been on the government agenda in the context of austerity measures and rationalization of public spending, but a serious discussion on what sort of social welfare model BiH needs has yet to take place. Such a discussion seems more relevant than ever, especially as future reforms are targeted at tightening eligibility rules for social assistance based on need, without an emphasis on the development of important social services or other means of securing decent lives for a number of categories of current and future beneficiaries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethnic Minorities Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Socio-Economic Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labour and Social Security Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hadžiristić, Tea</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malkić, Aida</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jusić, Mirna</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hodžić, Edin</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034795618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=1074724</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049449722 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T23:12:56Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:07:32Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034795618 |
oclc_num | 1414543344 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Analitika - Centar za društvena istraživanja, sva prava pridržana |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Analitika - Centar za društvena istraživanja, sva prava pridržana 2016 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2016 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Recently ranked as the fifth poorest country in Europe by the World Bank, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) faces a number of serious socio-economic challenges. According to World Bank estimates, 17.9% of BiH's population lived below the critical poverty line in 2011. In 2014 the unemployment rate was 27.5%, among the highest in Europe. The gender gap in employment is substantial, with women making up only 37.1% of those employed in 2014. Youth unemployment (ages 15-24) was the highest in Europe and recorded at a rate of 62.7% in 2014. Educational attainment of the working population is low, with 10.1% having completed higher, 48.7% secondary, and 41.2% primary education or lower in 2014. Compounding this poor socio-economic situation, the social protection system in BiH fails to meet the needs of the most disadvantaged among its citizens. Though the country spends 4% of its GDP on the social protection system - a comparatively high amount - only 17% of that funding goes to the population most in need. Estimates indicate that 72% of social benefits 'leak' to persons in far better socioeconomic positions, particularity due to the extraordinarily high level of war veteran benefits. While a large number of people in BiH became unemployed in recent years as a result of deindustrialization, failed privatization measures, and other economic turbulence related to transition to a market economy and postwar reconstruction, social protection has become less effective in responding to the needs of a growing number of social welfare beneficiaries. The current social protection system is marked by a number of deficiencies in both of Bosnia and Herzegovina's entities (Federation of BiH and Republika Srpska) and Brčko District. One of the key problems in the country is inadequate distribution of the available benefits. Numerous studies suggest that adequate protection is lacking for the most vulnerable users and that the allocation of available resources is disproportionate. Most social work centers are overburdened and have inadequate capacities. This is an especially significant problem given that these institutions collect applications, apply the defined criteria, and decide on the allocation of funds in each specific case. Another problem is a lack of campaigns aimed at informing users on their rights by social work centers and other actors in the field. According to a study based on focus groups with beneficiaries of social assistance, they were not aware of their rights under the current system, which is associated with a lack of information provided by the centers for social work. Overly complicated legislation is an additional component which perpetuates the poor condition of the social protection system in the state. Both entities and the district have different laws in force, whereas competences in each entity are further devolved to local levels (cantons and municipalities in FBiH), leading to wide variations in service provision. In FBiH, the main laws regulating social protection are the Law on the Protection of Civilian War Victims, the Law on Protection of Families with Children, the Family Law, and the Framework Law on Social Protection. The latter establishes a minimum level of social support, leaving it to the cantons to adopt specific cantonal laws, which results in significantly different amounts of social assistance benefits in different cantons). In Republika Srpska, as well as in Brčko District, the main laws in the field are the Law on Social Protection, the Law on the Protection of Children, and the Family Law. For one to enter the social protection system(s) in BiH and exercise the right to social assistance one must be assessed as unable to work or have no other sources of income. The system is means-tested and consists of a series of noncontributory rights available to individuals or families. Available contributions include social assistance for the poor and disability benefits and cover various categories of users such as the poor (those receiving permanent social assistance), persons with non-war related disabilities, and civilian war victims. Supervision is performed by the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy in the FBiH, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection in the RS, and the Department for Health and Other Services in Brčko District, while social work centers perform key operational activities in both entities and Brčko District. In recent years, social protection has been on the government agenda in the context of austerity measures and rationalization of public spending, but a serious discussion on what sort of social welfare model BiH needs has yet to take place. Such a discussion seems more relevant than ever, especially as future reforms are targeted at tightening eligibility rules for social assistance based on need, without an emphasis on the development of important social services or other means of securing decent lives for a number of categories of current and future beneficiaries Public Administration Welfare systems Ethnic Minorities Studies Socio-Economic Research Labour and Social Security Law Hadžiristić, Tea Sonstige oth Malkić, Aida Sonstige oth Jusić, Mirna Sonstige oth Hodžić, Edin Sonstige oth Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina Public Administration Welfare systems Ethnic Minorities Studies Socio-Economic Research Labour and Social Security Law |
title | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_auth | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_exact_search | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_exact_search_txtP | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_full | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_fullStr | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_full_unstemmed | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_short | Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
title_sort | intersecting inequalities in social protection in bosnia and herzegovina |
topic | Public Administration Welfare systems Ethnic Minorities Studies Socio-Economic Research Labour and Social Security Law |
topic_facet | Public Administration Welfare systems Ethnic Minorities Studies Socio-Economic Research Labour and Social Security Law |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadziristictea intersectinginequalitiesinsocialprotectioninbosniaandherzegovina AT malkicaida intersectinginequalitiesinsocialprotectioninbosniaandherzegovina AT jusicmirna intersectinginequalitiesinsocialprotectioninbosniaandherzegovina AT hodzicedin intersectinginequalitiesinsocialprotectioninbosniaandherzegovina AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary intersectinginequalitiesinsocialprotectioninbosniaandherzegovina |