THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process:
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin [Germany]
ESI - European Stability Initiative
2014
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | In the end it seemed almost inevitable. Croatia submitted its EU membership application to the Greek EU presidency in early 2003. At a referendum in January 2012 two thirds of Croatian voters supported their country's accession to the European Union as its 28th member. The referendum came after national elections in December 2011 in which all of the main political parties had backed EU membership. Although some observers noted that less than half of all eligible voters participated in the referendum, given the large number of "dead souls" in the voting registry and the fact that many Croatians living abroad did not vote, the percentage of resident voters who participated appears to have been above 61 per cent. Turnout was thus considerably higher than in Hungary (46 per cent) and comparable to Slovenia (60 per cent) and Poland (59 per cent). The January 2012 referendum concluded a decade in which successive Croatian governments had all assumed that there was no credible alternative to meeting the conditions put forward by the EU to become a full member. || But there was nothing inevitable about Croatia's evolution: it took significant political leadership, as well as courage and perseverance, to repudiate the values and policies of the 1990s. It also took, at key moments during this period, smart EU interventions. The Croatian experience, as well as the lessons it holds for the rest of the Western Balkans, is worth exploring in more detail |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049446836 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231204s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol851292 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1414564323 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049446836 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
264 | 1 | |a Berlin [Germany] |b ESI - European Stability Initiative |c 2014 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2014 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a In the end it seemed almost inevitable. Croatia submitted its EU membership application to the Greek EU presidency in early 2003. At a referendum in January 2012 two thirds of Croatian voters supported their country's accession to the European Union as its 28th member. The referendum came after national elections in December 2011 in which all of the main political parties had backed EU membership. Although some observers noted that less than half of all eligible voters participated in the referendum, given the large number of "dead souls" in the voting registry and the fact that many Croatians living abroad did not vote, the percentage of resident voters who participated appears to have been above 61 per cent. Turnout was thus considerably higher than in Hungary (46 per cent) and comparable to Slovenia (60 per cent) and Poland (59 per cent). The January 2012 referendum concluded a decade in which successive Croatian governments had all assumed that there was no credible alternative to meeting the conditions put forward by the EU to become a full member. || But there was nothing inevitable about Croatia's evolution: it took significant political leadership, as well as courage and perseverance, to repudiate the values and policies of the 1990s. It also took, at key moments during this period, smart EU interventions. The Croatian experience, as well as the lessons it holds for the rest of the Western Balkans, is worth exploring in more detail | ||
650 | 4 | |a Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) | |
650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034792731 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=851292 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804186204578512896 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049446836 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol851292 (OCoLC)1414564323 (DE-599)BVBBV049446836 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02643nmm a2200361zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049446836</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231204s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol851292</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1414564323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049446836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin [Germany]</subfield><subfield code="b">ESI - European Stability Initiative</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the end it seemed almost inevitable. Croatia submitted its EU membership application to the Greek EU presidency in early 2003. At a referendum in January 2012 two thirds of Croatian voters supported their country's accession to the European Union as its 28th member. The referendum came after national elections in December 2011 in which all of the main political parties had backed EU membership. Although some observers noted that less than half of all eligible voters participated in the referendum, given the large number of "dead souls" in the voting registry and the fact that many Croatians living abroad did not vote, the percentage of resident voters who participated appears to have been above 61 per cent. Turnout was thus considerably higher than in Hungary (46 per cent) and comparable to Slovenia (60 per cent) and Poland (59 per cent). The January 2012 referendum concluded a decade in which successive Croatian governments had all assumed that there was no credible alternative to meeting the conditions put forward by the EU to become a full member. || But there was nothing inevitable about Croatia's evolution: it took significant political leadership, as well as courage and perseverance, to repudiate the values and policies of the 1990s. It also took, at key moments during this period, smart EU interventions. The Croatian experience, as well as the lessons it holds for the rest of the Western Balkans, is worth exploring in more detail</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transformation Period (1990 - 2010)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034792731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=851292</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049446836 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T23:12:50Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:07:25Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034792731 |
oclc_num | 1414564323 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSearch | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | ESI - European Stability Initiative |
record_format | marc |
spelling | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process Berlin [Germany] ESI - European Stability Initiative 2014 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2014 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In the end it seemed almost inevitable. Croatia submitted its EU membership application to the Greek EU presidency in early 2003. At a referendum in January 2012 two thirds of Croatian voters supported their country's accession to the European Union as its 28th member. The referendum came after national elections in December 2011 in which all of the main political parties had backed EU membership. Although some observers noted that less than half of all eligible voters participated in the referendum, given the large number of "dead souls" in the voting registry and the fact that many Croatians living abroad did not vote, the percentage of resident voters who participated appears to have been above 61 per cent. Turnout was thus considerably higher than in Hungary (46 per cent) and comparable to Slovenia (60 per cent) and Poland (59 per cent). The January 2012 referendum concluded a decade in which successive Croatian governments had all assumed that there was no credible alternative to meeting the conditions put forward by the EU to become a full member. || But there was nothing inevitable about Croatia's evolution: it took significant political leadership, as well as courage and perseverance, to repudiate the values and policies of the 1990s. It also took, at key moments during this period, smart EU interventions. The Croatian experience, as well as the lessons it holds for the rest of the Western Balkans, is worth exploring in more detail Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
title | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_auth | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_exact_search | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_exact_search_txtP | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_full | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_fullStr | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_full_unstemmed | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_short | THE DIFFERENCE LEADERSHIP MAKES. Lessons from Croatia's EU accession process |
title_sort | the difference leadership makes lessons from croatia s eu accession process |
topic | Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
topic_facet | Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
work_keys_str_mv | AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary thedifferenceleadershipmakeslessonsfromcroatiaseuaccessionprocess |