Tense times: rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture
"Past. Present. Future. These are the three principal verb tenses available in English that allow us to express time. But there are many more options than tense alone. There is the entire T-A-M spectrum, which stands for tense, mood, and aspect. Tense marks past, present, and future. Aspect des...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
The University of Alabama Press
[2023]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Rhetoric, culture, and social critique
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Past. Present. Future. These are the three principal verb tenses available in English that allow us to express time. But there are many more options than tense alone. There is the entire T-A-M spectrum, which stands for tense, mood, and aspect. Tense marks past, present, and future. Aspect describes how past events are experienced in the present, or how the future is conceived and framed. And mood lets speakers distinguish fantasy from reality. Together, the T-A-M spectrum forms the backbone of syntax, that tricky sub-domain of grammar that lets English speakers create new worlds and make sense of the existing one. But syntaxes can tell us about much more than just time. They have profound implications for our conceptions of, and perceptions of, many matters, from the deeply personal (the narratives we construct about ourselves) to political and social matters. When you need to leave a room, do you ask, "may I be excused (weak conditional)," which implies collaboration, or "can I be excused (strong conditional)," which evokes an authoritarian stance? When speaking of lost loves, would you say, "I loved them" (past perfect), which describes an experience that is over? Or would you say, "I have loved them" (past imperfective), which describes an experience that continues? The rules of grammar cannot answer these questions for us. Such questions are in the domain of rhetoric, or persuasion, and require careful consideration of the complex ways syntaxes work in discourse. Syntaxes can help us understand our current political reality and shape persuasive discourse to address the many crises that seem to be everywhere at the current moment. "Tense Times: Syntax and Surprise in US Crisis Culture" shows how every instance of discourse can be read for its dominant verb form or syntax and how, in turn, those syntaxes create the very crises they describe. The book investigates a dozen popular discourses from the past decade of U.S. political culture, including Beyoncé's controversial hit single "Formation," the presidential campaign slogans of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, plans for a mosque at Ground Zero, and the death of George Floyd. Integrating theories of syntax from rhetorical, literary, affect, and cultural studies as well as linguistics and computer science, "Tense Times" shows how syntaxes form the fault lines of public argument, just like ideologies or political parties. Crucially, as Lee M. Pierce shows, those syntaxes do not merely describe experiences of crisis but actually bring those experiences into existence. |
| Beschreibung: | 171 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780817360870 9780817321673 9780817394639 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049355918 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20241209 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 231010s2023 xx b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780817360870 |c pbk. |9 978-0-8173-6087-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780817321673 |c hbk. |9 978-0-8173-2167-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780817394639 |9 9780817394639 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1398611757 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049355918 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 808 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Pierce, Lee M. |d 1983- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1349342327 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tense times |b rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |c Lee M. Pierce |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Rhetoric, syntax, and politics in United States crisis culture |
| 264 | 1 | |a Tuscaloosa, Alabama |b The University of Alabama Press |c [2023] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2023 | |
| 300 | |a 171 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Rhetoric, culture, and social critique | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Past. Present. Future. These are the three principal verb tenses available in English that allow us to express time. But there are many more options than tense alone. There is the entire T-A-M spectrum, which stands for tense, mood, and aspect. Tense marks past, present, and future. Aspect describes how past events are experienced in the present, or how the future is conceived and framed. And mood lets speakers distinguish fantasy from reality. Together, the T-A-M spectrum forms the backbone of syntax, that tricky sub-domain of grammar that lets English speakers create new worlds and make sense of the existing one. But syntaxes can tell us about much more than just time. They have profound implications for our conceptions of, and perceptions of, many matters, from the deeply personal (the narratives we construct about ourselves) to political and social matters. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a When you need to leave a room, do you ask, "may I be excused (weak conditional)," which implies collaboration, or "can I be excused (strong conditional)," which evokes an authoritarian stance? When speaking of lost loves, would you say, "I loved them" (past perfect), which describes an experience that is over? Or would you say, "I have loved them" (past imperfective), which describes an experience that continues? The rules of grammar cannot answer these questions for us. Such questions are in the domain of rhetoric, or persuasion, and require careful consideration of the complex ways syntaxes work in discourse. Syntaxes can help us understand our current political reality and shape persuasive discourse to address the many crises that seem to be everywhere at the current moment. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Tense Times: Syntax and Surprise in US Crisis Culture" shows how every instance of discourse can be read for its dominant verb form or syntax and how, in turn, those syntaxes create the very crises they describe. The book investigates a dozen popular discourses from the past decade of U.S. political culture, including Beyoncé's controversial hit single "Formation," the presidential campaign slogans of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, plans for a mosque at Ground Zero, and the death of George Floyd. Integrating theories of syntax from rhetorical, literary, affect, and cultural studies as well as linguistics and computer science, "Tense Times" shows how syntaxes form the fault lines of public argument, just like ideologies or political parties. Crucially, as Lee M. Pierce shows, those syntaxes do not merely describe experiences of crisis but actually bring those experiences into existence. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Textlinguistik |0 (DE-588)4124307-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Sprache |0 (DE-588)4046559-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Englisch |0 (DE-588)4014777-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Diskursanalyse |0 (DE-588)4194747-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Political aspects / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Social aspects / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a English language / Discourse analysis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a English language / Syntax | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Discours politique / États-Unis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhétorique / Aspect social / États-Unis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a English language / Discourse analysis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a English language / Syntax | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Political aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Social aspects | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Englisch |0 (DE-588)4014777-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Diskursanalyse |0 (DE-588)4194747-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Politische Sprache |0 (DE-588)4046559-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Textlinguistik |0 (DE-588)4124307-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034616161 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1822482781906665472 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pierce, Lee M. 1983- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1349342327 |
| author_facet | Pierce, Lee M. 1983- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pierce, Lee M. 1983- |
| author_variant | l m p lm lmp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049355918 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1398611757 (DE-599)BVBBV049355918 |
| dewey-full | 808 |
| dewey-hundreds | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
| dewey-ones | 808 - Rhetoric & collections of literature |
| dewey-raw | 808 |
| dewey-search | 808 |
| dewey-sort | 3808 |
| dewey-tens | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
| discipline | Literaturwissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049355918</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241209</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231010s2023 xx b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780817360870</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8173-6087-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780817321673</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8173-2167-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780817394639</subfield><subfield code="9">9780817394639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1398611757</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049355918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierce, Lee M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1983-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1349342327</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tense times</subfield><subfield code="b">rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture</subfield><subfield code="c">Lee M. Pierce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric, syntax, and politics in United States crisis culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tuscaloosa, Alabama</subfield><subfield code="b">The University of Alabama Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2023]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">171 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rhetoric, culture, and social critique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Past. Present. Future. These are the three principal verb tenses available in English that allow us to express time. But there are many more options than tense alone. There is the entire T-A-M spectrum, which stands for tense, mood, and aspect. Tense marks past, present, and future. Aspect describes how past events are experienced in the present, or how the future is conceived and framed. And mood lets speakers distinguish fantasy from reality. Together, the T-A-M spectrum forms the backbone of syntax, that tricky sub-domain of grammar that lets English speakers create new worlds and make sense of the existing one. But syntaxes can tell us about much more than just time. They have profound implications for our conceptions of, and perceptions of, many matters, from the deeply personal (the narratives we construct about ourselves) to political and social matters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">When you need to leave a room, do you ask, "may I be excused (weak conditional)," which implies collaboration, or "can I be excused (strong conditional)," which evokes an authoritarian stance? When speaking of lost loves, would you say, "I loved them" (past perfect), which describes an experience that is over? Or would you say, "I have loved them" (past imperfective), which describes an experience that continues? The rules of grammar cannot answer these questions for us. Such questions are in the domain of rhetoric, or persuasion, and require careful consideration of the complex ways syntaxes work in discourse. Syntaxes can help us understand our current political reality and shape persuasive discourse to address the many crises that seem to be everywhere at the current moment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Tense Times: Syntax and Surprise in US Crisis Culture" shows how every instance of discourse can be read for its dominant verb form or syntax and how, in turn, those syntaxes create the very crises they describe. The book investigates a dozen popular discourses from the past decade of U.S. political culture, including Beyoncé's controversial hit single "Formation," the presidential campaign slogans of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, plans for a mosque at Ground Zero, and the death of George Floyd. Integrating theories of syntax from rhetorical, literary, affect, and cultural studies as well as linguistics and computer science, "Tense Times" shows how syntaxes form the fault lines of public argument, just like ideologies or political parties. Crucially, as Lee M. Pierce shows, those syntaxes do not merely describe experiences of crisis but actually bring those experiences into existence.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Textlinguistik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124307-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046559-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Englisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014777-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diskursanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4194747-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Political aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Social aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language / Discourse analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language / Syntax</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discours politique / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhétorique / Aspect social / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language / Discourse analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language / Syntax</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Social aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Englisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014777-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Diskursanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4194747-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politische Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046559-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Textlinguistik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124307-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034616161</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV049355918 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:51:11Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-28T09:03:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780817360870 9780817321673 9780817394639 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034616161 |
| oclc_num | 1398611757 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 |
| physical | 171 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | The University of Alabama Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Rhetoric, culture, and social critique |
| spelling | Pierce, Lee M. 1983- Verfasser (DE-588)1349342327 aut Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture Lee M. Pierce Rhetoric, syntax, and politics in United States crisis culture Tuscaloosa, Alabama The University of Alabama Press [2023] © 2023 171 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Rhetoric, culture, and social critique "Past. Present. Future. These are the three principal verb tenses available in English that allow us to express time. But there are many more options than tense alone. There is the entire T-A-M spectrum, which stands for tense, mood, and aspect. Tense marks past, present, and future. Aspect describes how past events are experienced in the present, or how the future is conceived and framed. And mood lets speakers distinguish fantasy from reality. Together, the T-A-M spectrum forms the backbone of syntax, that tricky sub-domain of grammar that lets English speakers create new worlds and make sense of the existing one. But syntaxes can tell us about much more than just time. They have profound implications for our conceptions of, and perceptions of, many matters, from the deeply personal (the narratives we construct about ourselves) to political and social matters. When you need to leave a room, do you ask, "may I be excused (weak conditional)," which implies collaboration, or "can I be excused (strong conditional)," which evokes an authoritarian stance? When speaking of lost loves, would you say, "I loved them" (past perfect), which describes an experience that is over? Or would you say, "I have loved them" (past imperfective), which describes an experience that continues? The rules of grammar cannot answer these questions for us. Such questions are in the domain of rhetoric, or persuasion, and require careful consideration of the complex ways syntaxes work in discourse. Syntaxes can help us understand our current political reality and shape persuasive discourse to address the many crises that seem to be everywhere at the current moment. "Tense Times: Syntax and Surprise in US Crisis Culture" shows how every instance of discourse can be read for its dominant verb form or syntax and how, in turn, those syntaxes create the very crises they describe. The book investigates a dozen popular discourses from the past decade of U.S. political culture, including Beyoncé's controversial hit single "Formation," the presidential campaign slogans of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, plans for a mosque at Ground Zero, and the death of George Floyd. Integrating theories of syntax from rhetorical, literary, affect, and cultural studies as well as linguistics and computer science, "Tense Times" shows how syntaxes form the fault lines of public argument, just like ideologies or political parties. Crucially, as Lee M. Pierce shows, those syntaxes do not merely describe experiences of crisis but actually bring those experiences into existence. Textlinguistik (DE-588)4124307-9 gnd rswk-swf Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd rswk-swf Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd rswk-swf Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd rswk-swf Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Rhetoric / Political aspects / United States Rhetoric / Social aspects / United States English language / Discourse analysis English language / Syntax Discours politique / États-Unis Rhétorique / Aspect social / États-Unis Rhetoric / Political aspects Rhetoric / Social aspects United States USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 s Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 s Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 s Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 s Textlinguistik (DE-588)4124307-9 s DE-604 |
| spellingShingle | Pierce, Lee M. 1983- Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture Textlinguistik (DE-588)4124307-9 gnd Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4124307-9 (DE-588)4046559-7 (DE-588)4014777-0 (DE-588)4076704-8 (DE-588)4194747-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |
| title_alt | Rhetoric, syntax, and politics in United States crisis culture |
| title_auth | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |
| title_exact_search | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |
| title_full | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture Lee M. Pierce |
| title_fullStr | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture Lee M. Pierce |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tense times rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture Lee M. Pierce |
| title_short | Tense times |
| title_sort | tense times rhetoric syntax and politics in us crisis culture |
| title_sub | rhetoric, syntax, and politics in US crisis culture |
| topic | Textlinguistik (DE-588)4124307-9 gnd Politische Sprache (DE-588)4046559-7 gnd Englisch (DE-588)4014777-0 gnd Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Diskursanalyse (DE-588)4194747-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Textlinguistik Politische Sprache Englisch Rhetorik Diskursanalyse USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pierceleem tensetimesrhetoricsyntaxandpoliticsinuscrisisculture AT pierceleem rhetoricsyntaxandpoliticsinunitedstatescrisisculture |