"In what has become the predecessor to the current volume, The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus , I traced how what I am here calling the opinio communis was developed during the second half of the thirteenth century. As far as I can tell, the first theologian to tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben

1. Verfasser:	Cross, Richard 1964- (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	Oxford ; New York Oxford University Press [2023]
Schriftenreihe:	Changing paradigms in historical and systematic theology
Schlagworte:	Geschichte 1300-1595 Christologie
Zusammenfassung:	"In what has become the predecessor to the current volume, The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus , I traced how what I am here calling the opinio communis was developed during the second half of the thirteenth century. As far as I can tell, the first theologian to try to develop some theorized account of the view was Bonaventure , in the first half of the 1250s, it reached its standard form in Godfrey of Fontaines whose Quodlibet, the relevant text, was written in 1291-2; the Dominican Hervaeus Natalis (c. 1260-1323), whose commentary on book 3 of the Sentences dates from 1302; and its apogee in the Franciscan Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308), first in his Lectura on book 3 of the Sentences, probably composed in Oxford or (more likely) Cambridge in 1303, and the Parisian Reportatio, probably from 1304; and then in the slightly later Ordinatio on book 3; and finally in the 1306/7 Quodlibet, q. 19. Indeed, around the turn of the fourteenth century there was almost total unanimity about the basic metaphysical structure of Christology: the best way to construe the relation of person and natures in Christ is in terms of sustaining and dependence of a certain relevant sort. This dependence-relation was usually construed as itself some kind of categorial relation-a created item, located somewhere in the last seven of Aristotle's categories. Part of the argument in MI is that many of the apparent Christological differences between various theologians in the second half of the thirteenth century can be explained by their different metaphysical analyses not of the Incarnation but of the relation between a substance and its accidents. But by the beginning of the fourteenth century the position on this latter question had itself stabilized. There was general agreement that the relation between substance and accident should be analysed in terms of a joint relation of inherence/actualization and dependence, and that the relation between human nature and divine person should be understood in terms of the latter dependence without the former inherence/actualization"--
Beschreibung:	xx, 320 Seiten
ISBN:	9780198880646