Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education: waiver criteria for the Department of Defense
"More than 100 U.S. institutions of higher education hosted Confucius Institutes (CIs), Chinese government-funded language and culture centers, on campus during the late 2000s and 2010s. While CIs provided a source of funding and other resources that enabled U.S. colleges and universities to bu...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, DC
National Academies Press
[2023]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Consensus Study Report
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Image |
| Zusammenfassung: | "More than 100 U.S. institutions of higher education hosted Confucius Institutes (CIs), Chinese government-funded language and culture centers, on campus during the late 2000s and 2010s. While CIs provided a source of funding and other resources that enabled U.S. colleges and universities to build capacity, offer supplemental programming, and engage with the local community, CIs presented an added, legitimate source of risk to host institutions with respect to academic freedom, freedom of expression, and national security. By 2017, deteriorating U.S.-China relations led some U.S. colleges and universities to reconsider the value of having a CI on campus. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous U.S.-based CIs to close, especially following the passage of the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which contained a provision that ultimately barred institutions receiving Department of Defense (DOD) critical language flagship funding in Chinese from hosting a CI. While this provision allowed for a waiver process - and several affected colleges and universities applied for waivers in 2018 and 2019 - DOD did not issue any waivers. Today, seven CIs remain on U.S. university and college campuses. At the request of DOD, Confucius Institutes at U.S. Institutions of Higher Education presents a set of findings and recommendations for waiver criteria to potentially permit the continued presence of CIs on U.S. university campuses that also receive DOD funding."-- |
| Beschreibung: | xv, 101 Seiten 23 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780309694865 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049316366 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240213 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230907s2023 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309694865 |9 978-0-309-69486-5 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.17226/26747 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1422437215 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049316366 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education |b waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |c Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, DC |b National Academies Press |c [2023] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2023 | |
| 300 | |a xv, 101 Seiten |c 23 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Consensus Study Report | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "More than 100 U.S. institutions of higher education hosted Confucius Institutes (CIs), Chinese government-funded language and culture centers, on campus during the late 2000s and 2010s. While CIs provided a source of funding and other resources that enabled U.S. colleges and universities to build capacity, offer supplemental programming, and engage with the local community, CIs presented an added, legitimate source of risk to host institutions with respect to academic freedom, freedom of expression, and national security. By 2017, deteriorating U.S.-China relations led some U.S. colleges and universities to reconsider the value of having a CI on campus. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous U.S.-based CIs to close, especially following the passage of the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which contained a provision that ultimately barred institutions receiving Department of Defense (DOD) critical language flagship funding in Chinese from hosting a CI. While this provision allowed for a waiver process - and several affected colleges and universities applied for waivers in 2018 and 2019 - DOD did not issue any waivers. Today, seven CIs remain on U.S. university and college campuses. At the request of DOD, Confucius Institutes at U.S. Institutions of Higher Education presents a set of findings and recommendations for waiver criteria to potentially permit the continued presence of CIs on U.S. university campuses that also receive DOD funding."-- | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konfuzius-Institut |0 (DE-588)111157572X |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Höheres Bildungswesen |0 (DE-588)4299541-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Kongzi xue yuan | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Department of Homeland Security | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Subversive activities / China / History / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Confucianism / Study and teaching / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a National security / United States | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Foreign relations / China | |
| 653 | 2 | |a China / Foreign relations / United States | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4128022-2 |a Bericht |y 08.04.2022-17.08.2022 |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Konfuzius-Institut |0 (DE-588)111157572X |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Höheres Bildungswesen |0 (DE-588)4299541-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hanlon, Philip J. |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Murthy, Jayathi |0 (DE-588)1258727951 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rovito, Sarah M. |4 edt | |
| 710 | 2 | |a United States |b Science and Innovation Policy |4 isb | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) |b Policy and Global Affairs |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-309-69487-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://images.nap.edu/images/cover.php?record_id=26747 |3 Image |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20240213 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034577379 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804185822408212480 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author2 | Hanlon, Philip J. Murthy, Jayathi Rovito, Sarah M. |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | p j h pj pjh j m jm s m r sm smr |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1258727951 |
| author_facet | Hanlon, Philip J. Murthy, Jayathi Rovito, Sarah M. |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049316366 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1422437215 (DE-599)BVBBV049316366 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03913nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049316366</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240213 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230907s2023 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309694865</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-69486-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.17226/26747</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1422437215</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049316366</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education</subfield><subfield code="b">waiver criteria for the Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="c">Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, DC</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2023]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xv, 101 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Consensus Study Report</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"More than 100 U.S. institutions of higher education hosted Confucius Institutes (CIs), Chinese government-funded language and culture centers, on campus during the late 2000s and 2010s. While CIs provided a source of funding and other resources that enabled U.S. colleges and universities to build capacity, offer supplemental programming, and engage with the local community, CIs presented an added, legitimate source of risk to host institutions with respect to academic freedom, freedom of expression, and national security. By 2017, deteriorating U.S.-China relations led some U.S. colleges and universities to reconsider the value of having a CI on campus. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous U.S.-based CIs to close, especially following the passage of the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which contained a provision that ultimately barred institutions receiving Department of Defense (DOD) critical language flagship funding in Chinese from hosting a CI. While this provision allowed for a waiver process - and several affected colleges and universities applied for waivers in 2018 and 2019 - DOD did not issue any waivers. Today, seven CIs remain on U.S. university and college campuses. At the request of DOD, Confucius Institutes at U.S. Institutions of Higher Education presents a set of findings and recommendations for waiver criteria to potentially permit the continued presence of CIs on U.S. university campuses that also receive DOD funding."--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konfuzius-Institut</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)111157572X</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Höheres Bildungswesen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4299541-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kongzi xue yuan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Department of Homeland Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Subversive activities / China / History / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Confucianism / Study and teaching / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National security / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Foreign relations / China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">China / Foreign relations / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128022-2</subfield><subfield code="a">Bericht</subfield><subfield code="y">08.04.2022-17.08.2022</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konfuzius-Institut</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)111157572X</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Höheres Bildungswesen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4299541-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanlon, Philip J.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Murthy, Jayathi</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1258727951</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rovito, Sarah M.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Science and Innovation Policy</subfield><subfield code="4">isb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Policy and Global Affairs</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-309-69487-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://images.nap.edu/images/cover.php?record_id=26747</subfield><subfield code="3">Image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20240213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034577379</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4128022-2 Bericht 08.04.2022-17.08.2022 gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Bericht 08.04.2022-17.08.2022 |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV049316366 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:42:14Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:01:20Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780309694865 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034577379 |
| oclc_num | 1422437215 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | xv, 101 Seiten 23 cm |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20240213 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Consensus Study Report |
| spelling | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine Washington, DC National Academies Press [2023] © 2023 xv, 101 Seiten 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Consensus Study Report "More than 100 U.S. institutions of higher education hosted Confucius Institutes (CIs), Chinese government-funded language and culture centers, on campus during the late 2000s and 2010s. While CIs provided a source of funding and other resources that enabled U.S. colleges and universities to build capacity, offer supplemental programming, and engage with the local community, CIs presented an added, legitimate source of risk to host institutions with respect to academic freedom, freedom of expression, and national security. By 2017, deteriorating U.S.-China relations led some U.S. colleges and universities to reconsider the value of having a CI on campus. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous U.S.-based CIs to close, especially following the passage of the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which contained a provision that ultimately barred institutions receiving Department of Defense (DOD) critical language flagship funding in Chinese from hosting a CI. While this provision allowed for a waiver process - and several affected colleges and universities applied for waivers in 2018 and 2019 - DOD did not issue any waivers. Today, seven CIs remain on U.S. university and college campuses. At the request of DOD, Confucius Institutes at U.S. Institutions of Higher Education presents a set of findings and recommendations for waiver criteria to potentially permit the continued presence of CIs on U.S. university campuses that also receive DOD funding."-- Konfuzius-Institut (DE-588)111157572X gnd rswk-swf Höheres Bildungswesen (DE-588)4299541-3 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Kongzi xue yuan United States / Department of Homeland Security Subversive activities / China / History / 21st century Confucianism / Study and teaching / United States National security / United States United States / Foreign relations / China China / Foreign relations / United States (DE-588)4128022-2 Bericht 08.04.2022-17.08.2022 gnd-content USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Konfuzius-Institut (DE-588)111157572X s Höheres Bildungswesen (DE-588)4299541-3 s DE-604 Hanlon, Philip J. edt Murthy, Jayathi (DE-588)1258727951 edt Rovito, Sarah M. edt United States Science and Innovation Policy isb National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Policy and Global Affairs Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-309-69487-2 https://images.nap.edu/images/cover.php?record_id=26747 Image |
| spellingShingle | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense Konfuzius-Institut (DE-588)111157572X gnd Höheres Bildungswesen (DE-588)4299541-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)111157572X (DE-588)4299541-3 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4128022-2 |
| title | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |
| title_auth | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |
| title_exact_search | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |
| title_full | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine |
| title_fullStr | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine |
| title_full_unstemmed | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the Department of Defense Philip J. Hanlon, Jayathi Y. Murthy, and Sarah M. Rovito, editors ; U.S. Science and Innovation Policy ; Policy and Global Affairs ; National Academies Sciences, Engineering, Medicine |
| title_short | Confucius Institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education |
| title_sort | confucius institutes at u s institutions of higher education waiver criteria for the department of defense |
| title_sub | waiver criteria for the Department of Defense |
| topic | Konfuzius-Institut (DE-588)111157572X gnd Höheres Bildungswesen (DE-588)4299541-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Konfuzius-Institut Höheres Bildungswesen USA Bericht 08.04.2022-17.08.2022 |
| url | https://images.nap.edu/images/cover.php?record_id=26747 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hanlonphilipj confuciusinstitutesatusinstitutionsofhighereducationwaivercriteriaforthedepartmentofdefense AT murthyjayathi confuciusinstitutesatusinstitutionsofhighereducationwaivercriteriaforthedepartmentofdefense AT rovitosarahm confuciusinstitutesatusinstitutionsofhighereducationwaivercriteriaforthedepartmentofdefense AT unitedstatesscienceandinnovationpolicy confuciusinstitutesatusinstitutionsofhighereducationwaivercriteriaforthedepartmentofdefense AT nationalacademiesofsciencesengineeringandmedicineuspolicyandglobalaffairs confuciusinstitutesatusinstitutionsofhighereducationwaivercriteriaforthedepartmentofdefense |