Anti-corruption and populism: the Czech experience
"This book assesses what corruption means for populists, and the anti-corruption rhetoric of populist actors. The author uses the case study of Czech politicians to show how populist politicians exploit the notion of corruption in their communication. Using many examples of different political...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London ; New York
Routledge
[2023]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
| Zusammenfassung: | "This book assesses what corruption means for populists, and the anti-corruption rhetoric of populist actors. The author uses the case study of Czech politicians to show how populist politicians exploit the notion of corruption in their communication. Using many examples of different political statements (by presidents, party leaders, MPs, etc.), the populist discourse of corruption is discussed in the context of other discourses presented in Czech politics. The author analyses both Czech (not only populist) political party election manifestos and the political communication on social media from Czech anti-establishment and populist political parties (ANO, Freedom and Direct Democracy, and Pirates). Based on an extensive conceptual framework the book also focuses on whether mainstream parties respond to the success of populists by adopting populist anti-corruption rhetoric themselves and the similarities and differences between the approaches they adopt. Understanding the processes of more than thirty years of Czech post-communist politics, and offering a theoretical and methodological framework applicable to research conducted in other contexts, this book will appeal to scholars of political science, sociology and economics"-- |
| Beschreibung: | ix, 116 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781032282534 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049309139 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240110 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230901s2023 |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781032282534 |c hbk |9 978-1-032-28253-4 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781032282534 |9 978-1-03-228253-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1409124664 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049309139 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Naxera, Vladimír |d 1986- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1079196498 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Anti-corruption and populism |b the Czech experience |c Vladimír Naxera |
| 264 | 1 | |a London ; New York |b Routledge |c [2023] | |
| 300 | |a ix, 116 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 25 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Introduction -- (Anti-)Corruption (Not Only) in the Czech Way: On the Road to Populism? -- Populism and Anti-Corruption -- "Mainstreamisation of Populists" and "Mainstream Inclination to Populist Principles?" -- The Subject of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties -- Populism, Anti-Corruption, and the Czech Pirate Party -- Concluding Remarks | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This book assesses what corruption means for populists, and the anti-corruption rhetoric of populist actors. The author uses the case study of Czech politicians to show how populist politicians exploit the notion of corruption in their communication. Using many examples of different political statements (by presidents, party leaders, MPs, etc.), the populist discourse of corruption is discussed in the context of other discourses presented in Czech politics. The author analyses both Czech (not only populist) political party election manifestos and the political communication on social media from Czech anti-establishment and populist political parties (ANO, Freedom and Direct Democracy, and Pirates). Based on an extensive conceptual framework the book also focuses on whether mainstream parties respond to the success of populists by adopting populist anti-corruption rhetoric themselves and the similarities and differences between the approaches they adopt. Understanding the processes of more than thirty years of Czech post-communist politics, and offering a theoretical and methodological framework applicable to research conducted in other contexts, this book will appeal to scholars of political science, sociology and economics"-- | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Kommunikation |0 (DE-588)4134262-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Bekämpfung |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)7740893-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Populismus |0 (DE-588)4129521-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Korruption |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)4564162-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political corruption / Czech Republic | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Populism / Czech Republic | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Politicians / Czech Republic / Attitudes | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Communication in politics / Czech Republic | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Political aspects / Czech Republic | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Czech Republic / Politics and government / 1993- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Communication in politics | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political corruption | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Politicians / Attitudes | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Politics and government | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Populism | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rhetoric / Political aspects | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Czech Republic | |
| 653 | 4 | |a Since 1993 | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Populismus |0 (DE-588)4129521-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Politische Kommunikation |0 (DE-588)4134262-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Korruption |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)4564162-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Bekämpfung |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)7740893-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 775 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-032-28269-5 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-003-29601-0 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20240110 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034570275 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 070.9 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 4371 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804185810886459392 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents vii x Preface List of Abbreviations 1 Introduction 1 (Anti-)corruption (not only) in the Czech way: on the road to populism? Defining corruption: a problem? 8 Constructivist approaches to (anti-)corruption 11 The formation of the concept of corruption in the Czech environment: development, ideologicalframeworks, and the rise ofpopulism 14 Perceptions of corruption, distrust and electoral success of new actors 27 ( Anti-)corruption and “new” political parties 28 Conclusion 33 2 Populism and anti-corruption What is populism? 42 Rise of populism in Czech politics 45 “Corrupt elite” as the core of the populist message 50 Conclusion 58 3 Mainstreamisation of populists” and “mainstream inclination to populist principles”? The subject of corruption in the election manifestos of Czech political parties Populism and mainstream: a research overview 65 Input data, methodological procedure and operationalisation of the order of populist communication 67 7 41 64
vi Contents Analysis and interpretation of results 70 Conclusion 74 4 Populism, anti-corruption and the Czech Pirate Party Pirate politics, populism and anti-corruption 79 Data and methodology 80 Is the anti-corruption rhetoric of the Czech Pirates populist? 82 Conclusion 85 77 Concluding remarks 88 Bibliography Index 93 113
Bibliography Aalberg, T., F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese. 2017. Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315623016. Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, A. Zaslovc. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324-1353, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0010414013512600. Albertazzi, D. 2009. “Reconciling ‘Voice’ and ‘Exit’: Swiss and Italian Populists in Power.” Politics 29 (1): 1-10, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 111/j. 1467-9256.2008.01 332.x. Albertazzi, D., D. McDonnell. 2008. “The Sceptre and the Spectre.” Pp. 1-11 in D. Albertazzi, D. McDonnell (eds.). Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. New York: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780 230592100J. Anderson, Ch. J., Z. V. Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91-109, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00007. Antal, A. 2017. “The Political Theories, Preconditions and Dangers of the Governing Populism in Hungary.” Politologicky casopislCzech Journal of Political Science 24 ( 1 ): 5-20, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-1 -5. Arialy, G., E. Μ. Uslaner. 2017. “Corruption, Fairness, and Inequality.” International Political Science Review 38 (3): 349-362, https://doi.org/10.1177/019251211 6641091. Aslanidis, P. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse with Semantic Text Analysis: An Application on Grassroots Populist Mobilization.” Quality Quantity 52 (3):
12411263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11135-017-0517-4. Âslund, A. 2007. How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511790416 . Bach, D. C. 2011. “Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism: Comparative Trajectories and Readings.” Commonwealth Comparative Politics 49 (3): 275-294, https://doi. org/10.1080/14662043.2011.582731. Baez-Camargo, C., A. Ledeneva. 2017. “Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin? Informal Governance and the Public/Private Crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania.” Slavonic East European Review 95 (1): 49-75, https://doi.org/ 10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.1.0049.
94 Bibliography Bâgenholm, A. 2013. “Throwing the Rascals Out? The Electoral Effects of Corruption Allegations and Corruption Scandals in Europe 1981-2011.” Crime, Law and Social Change 60 (5): 595-609, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0611-013-9482-6. Bâgenholm, A., N. Charron. 2014. “Do Politics in Europe Benefit from Politicising Corruption?” (Vest European Politics 37 (5): 903-931, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01402382.2014.909164. Baggini, J. 2015. “The Populist Threat to Pluralism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5): 403-412, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1177/0191453714564460. Balaban, D. C., H. O. Vincze, Μ. Stoica, I. Madveschi. 2021. “The Populist Dimension of Mediated Discourses about Corruption in Romania.” Central European Journal of Communication 29 (2): 287-234, https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.14.2(29).5. Barr, R. R. 2009. “Populists, Outsiders and Anti-establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15 (1): 29-48, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1177/1354068808097890. Bauer, Μ. W., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit, S. Becker (eds.). 2021. Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies. Routledge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504 . Beasley-Murray, J. 2006. “On Populism Reason (Laclau), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (Panizza), Review.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 362-367, https:// doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300255. Becker, U., A. Vasileva. 2017. “Russia’s Political Economy Re-conceptualized: A Changing Hybrid of Liberalism, Statism and Patrimonialism. Journal of Eurasian Studies 8: 83-96,
https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.euras.2016.l 1.003. Bcissinger, Μ. R., G. Sasse. 2014. “An End to “Patience”? The Great Recession and Economic Protest in Eastern Europe.” Pp. 334-370 in L. Bartels, N. Bermeo (eds.). Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.Org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357 505.003.0011. Berti, C., R. Bratu, S. Wickberg. 2020. “Corruption and the Media.” Pp. 107-117 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00015. Betz, H.-G., C. Johnson. 2004. “Against the Current - Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 311-327, https://doi.org/10.1080/135693104200 0263546. Bilek, J., J. Lysek, R. Zbiral. 2021. “Vêrni svému jménu? Jak politické strany mezery pûsobi v legislativnim procesu [True to Their Name? Activities of Niche Political Parties in the Legislative Process].” Sociologicky casopisICzech Sociological Review 57 (4): 433-454, https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2021.010. Boatright, R. G. 2020. “Populist Corruption Talk, and Some Alternatives.” Pp. 176184 in Μ. Nadesan, A. Ron (eds.). Mapping Populism: A Guide to Understanding and Studying Populism. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295 089-17. Bobba, G., C. Crémones, Μ. Mancosu, A. Seddone. 2018. “Populism and the Gender Gap: Comparing Digital Engagement with Populist and Non-populist Facebook Pages in France,
Italy, and Spain.” The International Journal of Press!Politics 23 (4): 458-475, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218787046. Bolleyer, N., C. Little, F. C. Von Nostitz. 2015. “Implementing Democratic Equality in Political Parties: Organisational Consequences in the Swedish and the German
Bibliography 95 Pirate Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 38 (2): 158-178, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9477.12044. Bossetta, Μ. 2017. “Fighting Fire with Fire: Mainstream Adoption of the Populist Political Style in the 2014 Europe Debates between Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (4): 715-734, https://doi. org/10.1177/1369148117715646. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511812507. Bratu, R., D. A. Sotiropoulos, Μ. Stoyanova. 2017. “Through the Lens of Social Constructionism: The Development of Innovative Anti-corruption Policies and Practices in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania, 2000-2015.” Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 117-150, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.L0117. Bratu, R., I. Kazoka. 2018. “Metaphors of Corruption in the News Media Coverage of Seven European Countries.” European Journal of Communication 33 (7): 57-72, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1177/0267323117750695. Brown, K., A. Mondon. 2021. “Populism, the Media, and the Mainstreaming of the Far Right: The Guardian’s Coverage of Populism as a Case Study.” Politics 41 (3): 279-295, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0263395720955036. Brunclik, Μ. 2016. “Three Technocratic Cabinets in the Czech Republic: A Symptom of Party Failure?” Politics in Central Europe 12 (2): 7-28, https://doi.org/10.1515/ pcc-2016-0010. Bruscnbauch Meislovâ, Μ., D. Marek. 2022. “‘It’s the EU’s Fault!’Strategies of Blame Avoidance in Andrej Babis’s Discourse on the Conflict-of-interest Case.”
European Politics and Society (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2043066. Burkart, P. 2014. Pirate Politics: The New Information Policy Contests. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitprcss/9205.001.0001. Bustikovâ, L., P. Babos. 2020. “Best in Covid: Populists in the Time of Pandemic.” Politics and Governance 8 (4): 496-508, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 7645/pag.v8i4.3424. Bustikovâ, L., P. Guasti. 2017. “The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe?” Politics and Governance 5 (4): 166-176, https://doi.Org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.l 156. Bustikovâ, L., P. Guasti. 2019. “The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (2): 302330, https://doi/org/10.1177/0888325418791723. Buzalka, J. 2021. “Village Fascists and Progressive Populists: Two Faces of the Countermovement in Slovakia.” Europe-Asia Studies 73 (9): 1658-1682, https:// doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1978934. Buzogâny, A., Ch. Mohamad-Klotzbach. 2021. “Populism and Nature—the Nature of Populism: New Perspectives on the Relationship between Populism, Climate Change, and Nature Protection.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 15: 155-164, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl2286-021-00492-7 . Buzogâny, A., Ch. Mohamad-Klotzbach. 2022. “Environmental Populism.” Pp. 321— 340 in Μ. Oswald (ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_19. Canovan, Μ. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47 (1): 2-16,
https://doi.0rg/lO.l 111/1467-9248.00184. Caramani, D. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 54-67,https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538.
96 Bibliography Casciano, D. 2021. “Popular Tales of Pastors, Luxury, Frauds and Corruption: Pentecostalism, Conspicuous Consumption, and the Moral Economy of Corruption in Nigeria.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): 52-71, https:// doi.org/10.5617/jea.9008. Cervinkovâ, Μ., L. Kulhavâ. 2013. “Karel Schwarzenberg a Milos Zeman: Pozitivni a negativni kampaft к prezidentskÿm volbâm [Karel Schwarzenberg and Milos Zeman: Positive and Negative Campaign before the Presidential Elections].” Nase spolecnost 11 (2): 16-29. Charrad, Μ. Μ., J. Adams. 2011. “Patrimonialism, Past and Present.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636: 6-15, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0002716211402286. Charvât, J. 2013. “Analÿza proccsu zavâdéni pfimé volby prezidenta v CR [Analysis of Adopting of Direct Presidential Election in Czechia].” Evropskd volebni studial European Electoral Studies 8 (2): 146-159. Charvât, J„ P. Just. 2017. Krize politickëho stranictvl a novi stranNti aktéri v ceské politice [Crisis of Political Partisanship and New Political Actors in Czech PoliticsJ. Prague: Μ UP Press. Chlup, R. 2020. “Competing Myths of Czech Identity.” New Perspectives 28 (2): 179204, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/2336825X20911817. Chryssogelos, A.-S. 2013. “The Evolution of the ‘Populist Potential’ in European Politics: From New Right Radicalism to Antisystem Populism.” European View 12 (1): 75-83, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl2290-013-0249-3. Chytilek, R. 2021. “Corrupt Elites, Pure People and Double Standards? Attitudes of Central European Populist and Mainstream Political Party
Sympathisers to Systemic and Individual Corruption.” Pp. 58-86 in J. Mendilow, É. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109676.00011. Cirhan, T., P. Kopecky. 2017. “Career Backgrounds, Professional Network and Party Cohesion: The Success of ANO in the Czech Republic.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 116-136, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-2-l 16. Cisaf, O. 2017. Czech Republic: From Post-Communist Idealism to Economic Populism. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Cisaf, О., V. Stëtka. 2017. “Czech Republic. The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream.” Pp. 285-298 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, С. H. Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Crossley, N. 2002. Making Sense of Social Movements. Buckingham: Open University Press. CVVM. 2013. “Stranické preference a volebni model v bfeznu 2013 [Party Support and Electoral Model in March 2013.” [online] CVVM [retrieved 3. 11. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/ al442/f9/pvl 30320.pdf CVVM. 2014. “Postoje к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2014 [Attitudes towards Political Parties - September 2014].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 5. 11. 2014]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/cl/a7280/13/ pvl41029.pdf. CVVM. 2016. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2016 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - September 2016].”
[online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/al582/f9/pvl 61107a.pdf.
Bibliography 97 CVVM. 2017. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2017 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - September 2017].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/a4441 /f9/pv 171030.pdf. CVVM. 2018. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - listopad 2018 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - November 2018].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/a4765/f9/pvl81212.pdf. CVVM. 2020a. “Mira naléhavosti rùznÿch oblasti vefejného zivota - bfezen 2020 [Degree of Urgency of Different Areas of Public Life].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/ documen ts/c2/a5191 Zf9/po200414.pdf. CVVM. 2020b. “Vliv na politické rozhodovâni -bfezen 2020[Influence on the Political Decision-Making - March 2020].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2contcnt/documents/c2/a5205/f9/ pd2OO511.pdf. Dahlberg, S., Μ. Solcvid. 20016. “Docs Corruption Suppress Voter Turnout?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (4): 489-510, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17457289.2016.1223677. Dawson, J., S. Hanley. 2016. “What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”.” Journal of Democracy П (1): 20-34, https:// doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0015. De Cleen, B„ J. Glynos, A. Mondon. 2018. “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of
Engagement.” Organization 25 (5): 649-661, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/13505 08418768053. de Lange, S. L. 2012. “New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties.” Political Studies 60:899-918, https://doi.org/10.1111/ j. 1467-9248.2012.00947.x. Deegan-Krause, К., T. Haughton. 2018. “Surviving the Storm: Factors Determining Party Survival in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 32 (3): 473^492, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 177/0888325417728773. Demker, Μ. 2014. “Sailing along New Cleavages: Understanding the Electoral Success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament Election 2009.” Government and Opposition 49 (2): 188-206, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.24. Devadoss, S., J. Luckstead. 2015. “Can a Corrupt Ruling Party Win a Re-election through Vote Buying?” Applied Economics 8 (1): 18-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00036846.2015.1073839. Di Cocco, J., B. Monechi. 2022. “How Populist Are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning.” Political Analysis 30 (3): 311-327, https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.29. Dvofâkovâ, V. 2020. “О prostoru korupcnich prilezitosti. Kdy, kde a jak se vytvdri v feské republice /On Corruption Opportunity Space: When, Where, and How It Is Established in the Czech Republic].” Prague: SLON. Engler, S. 2016. “Corruption and Electoral Support for New Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 39 (2): 278-304, https.7/doi. org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1084127. Engler, S. 2020a. “Centrist Anti-establishment
Parties and Their Protest voters: More than a Superficial Romance?” European Political Science Review 12 (3): 307-325, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1017/S1755773920000132. Bayerisch J München I
98 Bibliography Engler, S. 2020b. ‘“Fighting Corruption’ or ‘Fighting the Corrupt Elite’? Politicizing Corruption within and beyond the Populist Divide.” Democratization 27 (4): 643661, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1713106. Erlingsson,G. 0., Μ. Persson. 2011. “The Swedish Pirate Party and the 2009 European Election: Protest or Issue Voting.” Politics 31 (3): 121-128, https://doi.org/10.llll/ j.1467-9256.2011.01411.x. Fieschi, C., P. Heywood. 2004. “Trust Cynicism and Populist Anti-Politics.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 289-309, https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263537. Fischer, F. 1989. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications. Foa, R. S. 2021. “Why Strongmen Win in Weak States.” Journal of Democracy 32 (1): 52-65, https://doi.org/10.13533/jod.2021.0000 . Frecden, Μ. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theories: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Frii, P. 1999. “Korupini klima v ÖR [Corruptin Climate in the Czech Republic].” Pp. 73-115 in P. Frii (ed.). Korupce na ceskÿ zpusob [Corruption in the Czech Way]. Prague: G plus G. Fric, R, J. Kabele. 1999. “Korupce jako sociâlni fenomén [Corruption as a Social Phenomenon].” Pp. 9-47 in P. Frii (ed.). Korupce na cesky zpusob [Corruption in the Czech Way], Prague: G plus G. Frii, P., O. Gyarfâsovâ. 2019. “The Rise of the Politics of Emotions: Anti-elitism and Anti-corruptism as Traits of Czech and Slovak Populist Parties.” Politické vedy!Political Sciences 22 (4): 221-246, https://doi.org/10.24040/politickev edy.2019.22.4.221246. Gerodimos, R., J. Justinussen. 2015.
“Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button.” Journal of Information Technology Politics 12 (2): 113-32, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266. Gidron, N., B. Bonikowski. 2013. Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda. Working Paper. Cambridge: Harvard University, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459387. Graziano, L. 2001. Lobbying, Pluralism and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Gregor, Μ., A. Mackovâ. 2015. “Euroscepticism the Czech way: An Analysis of Vaclav Klaus’ Speeches.” European Journal of Communication 30 (4): 404-417, https://doi. org/10.1177/0267323115582148 Grzymala-Busse, A. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511618819. Guasti, P. 2020. “Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020). ” Politics and Governance is (4): 473-484, https:// doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420. Gupta, A. 1995. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State.” American Ethnologist 22 (2): 375-402, https://doi. org/10.1525/ae. 1995.22.2.02a00090. Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hâjek, L. 2017. “Left, Right, Left, Right... Centre: Ideological Position of Andrej Babis’s ANO.” Politologickÿ casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 24 (3):
275301, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-3-275.
Bibliography 99 Hanley, S. 2004. “From Neo-Liberalism to National Interests: Ideology, Strategy, and Party Development in the Euroscepticism of the Czech Right.” East European Politics and Societies 18 (3): 513-547, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0888325404267392. Hanley, S. 2011. “Dynamika utvâïeni novÿch stran v Ceské republice v letech 19962010: hlcdàni moznÿch pfiCin politického zemêtfeseni [Dynamics of New Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996-2010: Looking for the Origins of a Political Earthquake].” Sociologicky casopis!Czech Sociological Review 47 (1): 115-136, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.13060/00380288.2011.47.1.06. Hanley, S. 2014. “Two Cheers for Czech Democracy.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 161-176, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2014-3-161. Hanley, S. 2018. “Legitimacy and the Paradox of Technocratic Government in Newer European Democracies: The Fischer Administration in the Czech Republic Revisited.” East European Polities and Societies 32 (1): 78-100, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0888325417734281. Hanley, S., A. Sikk. 2016. “Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 22 (4): 522-533, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/1354068814550438. Hanley, S., Μ. A. Vachudova. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276 -296, https:// doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457. Hanson, S. E. 2011. “Plebiscitarian Patrimonialism in Putin s Russia: Legitimating Authoritarianism in a
Postidcological Era.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636: 32-48, https://doi.org/10.! 177/00027 16211398210. Hardarson, 0. t»., E. H. Önnudottir. 2018. “Election Report: Iceland.” Scandinavian Political Studies 41 (2): 233-237, https://doi.org/10.! 111/1467-9477.12112. Hartleb, F. 2013. “Anti-elitist Cyber Parties. Journal of Public Affairs 13 (4): 355-369, https://doi.org/! 0.1002/pa. 1480. Haughton, T., K. Deegan-Krause. 2015. “Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 29 (1): 61-80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414566072. Havlik, V. 2019. “Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 369-384, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758 216.2019.1580590. Havlik, V., Μ. NèmCok, P. Spâ6, J. Zagrapan. 2020. “The 2020 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia. Steadily Turbulent Change of Direction.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 27 (3): 221-234, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2020-3-221. Havlik, V., P. Voda. 2016. “The Rise of New Political Parties and Re-Alignment of Party Politics in the Czech Republic.” Acta Politologica 8 (2): 119-144. Havlik, V., P. Voda. 2018. “Cleavages, Protest or Voting for Hope? The Rise of Centrist Populist Parties in the Czech Republic.” Swiss Political Science Review 24 (2): 161— 168, https://doi.org/10.ll 11/spsr. 12299. Havlik, V, V. Hlousek. 2014. “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: The Story of the Populist Public Affairs Party in the Czech Republic.” Perspectives on
European Politics and Society 15 (4): 552-570, https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2014.945254. Hawkins, K. A. 2009. “Is Châvez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040-1067, https:// doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.
100 Bibliography Hawkins, К. A. 2010. Venezuela s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB0978051 1730245. Hawkins, К. A., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017a. “The Ideational Approach to Populism.” Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 513-528, https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.85 . Hawkins, К. A., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017b. “What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach Us, and What It Can’t.” 5iv/m Political Science Review 23 (4): 526-542, https://doi.org/10.! 111/spsr. 12281. Heidenheimer, A. 1989. “Perceptions on the Perception of Corruption.” Pp. 149-164 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Heywood, P. Μ. 2017. “Rethinking Corruption: Hocus-Pocus, Locus and Focus.” The Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 21-48, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveaste urorev2.95.1.0021. Hilmar, T. 2022. “Restoring Economic Pride? How Right-Wing Populists Moralize Economic Change.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2056729. Hlousck, V. 2012. “Vèci vefejné: politické podnikâni strany typu firmy [The Public Affairs Party: The Political Enterprise of a Business Firm Party].” Politologickÿ casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 322-340, https://doi.org/10.5817/ PC2012-4-322. Hlousek, V., L. KopeCek, P. Vodovâ. 2020. The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-41916-5. Holmes, L. 1993.
The End of Communist Power Anti-corruption Campaigns and Legitimization Crisis. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. Holmes, L. 2003. “Political Corruption in Central and Eastern Europe.” Pp. 193206 in Μ. J. Bull, J. L. Newell (eds.). Corruption in Contemporary Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919991_15. Holmes, L. 2015. Corruption: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199689699.001.0001 . Hopkin, J., C. Paolucci. 1999. “The Business Firm Party Model of Party Organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 285-305, https://doi.org/10.llll/1475-6765.00451 . Huber, R. A. 2020. “The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection.” Environmental Politics 29 (6): 959-982, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186. Huber, R. A., E. Greussing, J.-M. Eberl. 2021. “From Populism to Climate Scepticism: The Role of Institutional Trust and Attitudes towards Science.” Environmental Politics (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200. Hunger, S., F. Paxton. 2022. “What’s in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science.” Political Science Research and Methods 10 (3): 617-633, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44 . Ibenskas, R., A. Sikk. 2017. “Patterns of Party Change in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2015.” Party Politics 23 (1): 43-54, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540 68816655571. Ivarsflaten, E. 2008. “What Unites Right-
Wing Populists in Western Europe? ReExamining Grievance Mobilization Models in Seven Successful Cases. ” Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 3-23, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168.
Bibliography 101 Jääsaari, J., D. Sârovec. 2021. “Pirate Parties: The Original Digital Party Family.” Pp. 205-226 in O. Barberà, G. Sandri, P. Correa, J. Rodriguez-Teruel (eds.). Digital Parties. The Challenges of Online Organisation and Participation. Springer, https:// doi.org/10.1OO7/978-3-O3O-78668-7J1. Jagers, J., S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319-45, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j.1475-6765. 2006.00690.x. Johnston, Μ. 2001. “The Definitions Debate: Old Conflicts in New Guises.” Pp. 11-31 in A. K. Jain (cd.). The Political Economy of Corruption. Routledge, https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203468388.ch2. Johnston. Μ. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption. Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB0978051 1490965. Jowitt, K. 1983. “Soviet Neotraditionalism: The Political Corruption of a Leninist Regime.” Soviet Studies 35 (3): 275-297, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813830 8411481. Just, R, J. Charvât. 2016. “Business-Firm Parties and the Czech Party System after 2010.” Politics in Central Europe 12 (3), https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0018. Kajsiu, B. 2020. ^Corrupcion piiblica 0 privada? La dimension ideolögica de los discursos anti-corrupciôn en Colombia, Ecuador y Albania. Bogota: Tirant lo Blanch. Kajsiu, В. 2021. “Public or Private Corruption? The Ideological Dimensions of Anti corruption Discourses in Colombia, Ecuador and Albania.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): 27-51,
https://doi.org/10.5617/jca.9243. Karklins, R. 2005. The System Made Me Do It. Corruption In Post-Communist Societies. Armonk and London: Μ. E. Sharpe. Kcfford, G., B. Moffitt, A. Werner. 2022. “Populist Attitudes: Bringing Together Ideational and Communicative Approaches.” Political Studies 70 (4): 1006-1027, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321721997741 Keller, J. 2013. “Kupte si svûj ùfad! [Buy Your Own Office!].” Salon, 1 August 2013:3,5. Kim, S. 2022. Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrdd Four. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186007. Kiss, T., I. G. Székely. 2022. “Populism on the Semi-periphery: Some Considerations for Understanding the Anti-corruption Discourse in Romania.” Problems of Post Communism 69 (6): 514-527, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1869907. Klaveren, J. van. 1989. “Corruption as a Historical Phenomenon.” Pp. 73-86 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Klima, Μ. 2015. Od totality к defektnidemokracii. Privatizace a kolonizacepolitickych stran netransparentnlm byznysem [From Totalitarianism to Defective Democracy: The Privatization and Colonization of Political Parties by Non-transparent Business]. Prague: SLON. Kmenta, J. 2017. Boss Babis. Nymburk: JKM. Knight, A. 1998. “Populism and Neo-populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 30 (2): 223-248, https://doi.org/10.1017/S00222 16X98005033. Kopecek, L. 2013. “Opoziéni smlouvy “za kopeCky” IL: Byl pakt CSSD a ODS z let 1998-2002 demokratickou
deviaci? [Opposition Agreements Outside the Czech Republic IL: Was the Social Democratic Party and Civic Democratic Party Pact
102 Bibliography from 1998 to 2002 a Democratic Deviation? (Part Two)].” Stredoevropsképolitické Studie/Central European Political Studies Review 15 (4): 284-299, https://doi.org/ 10.5817/CEPSR.2013.4.284. KopeCek, L. 2015. Deformace demokracie? Opozicni smlouva a ceskä politika 19982002 /Deformation of Democracy? Opposition Agreement and Czech Politics 19982002]. Brno: Barrister Principal. Kopeiek, L. 2016. “‘I’m Paying, So I Decide’: Czech ANO as an Extreme Form of a Business-Firm Party.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (4): 725-749, https:// doi.org/10.1177/0888325416650254. Kopeiek, L. 2017. Milos Zeman. Pribêh talentovanëho pragmatika [Milos Zeman. The Talented Pragmatic s Story]. Brno: Barrister Principal. Kopeckÿ, P., Μ. Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897-921, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01402382.2011.591072. Kossow, N. 2019. “Populism and Corruption (Transparency International Anti corruption Helpdesk Answer).” [online] Transparency International [retrieved 8. 8. 2022]. Available at: https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdcsk/popul ism-and-corruption. Kostadinova, T. 2012. Political Corruption in Eastern Europe: Politics After Communism. London: Lynne Rienner Puslishers, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626374157. Krastev, I. 2004. Shifting Obsessions: Three Essays on the Politics of Anticorruption. Budapest: CEU Press. Krôâl, P., V. Naxera. 2018. “Populistickâ konstrukcc nâroda ohrozeného migraci: CAQDAS volebniho diskurzu öeskych parlamentnich voleb v race 2017
[Populistic Construction of Nation Threatened by Migration: CAQDAS of Election Discourse within 2017 Czech Parliamentary Elections].” Sociolôgia 50 (5): 491-523, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2018.50.5.19. Kriesi, H. 2012. “The Political Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest.” Swiss Political Science Review 18 (4): 518-522, https://doi.Org/10.l 111/spsr. 12006. Khzkovsky, Μ. 2019. “Tizivé dëdictvi nové politiky v Cesku: Zeleni jako pfipad neùspëSného morâlniho populismu [The Burdensome Legacy of New Politics in Czechia: The Greens as a Case of Failed Moral Populism].” Central European Journal of Politics 5(1): 30-54. Krouwel, A. 2006. “Party Models.” Pp. 249-269 in R. S. Katz, W. Crotty (eds.). Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608 047.n22. Kubânek, Μ. 2016. “Role populismu ve volebnim marketingu hnuti ANO pfed parlamentnimi volbami v roce 2013 [The Role of Populism in the Electoral Marketing of the Movement ANO Before the Czech Parliamentary Election in 2013]. ” Stredoevropsképolitické studielCentral European Political Studies Review 18 (4): 319-353, https://doi.Org/10.5817/CEPSR.2016.4.319. Kubât, Μ., Μ. Brunclik. 2018. Semi-presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Presidents: Presidential Politics in Central Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, https:// doi.org/10.4324/9781315166452. Kubbe, I., Μ. Loli. 2020. “Corruption and Populism: The Linkage.” Pp. 107-117 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00016.
Bibliography 103 Kupka, P., Μ. Mocht’ak. 2015. “The Nagygate Affair, Corruption and Organized Crime: Corruption Networks and Their Potential Impact on the Quality of Democracy in the Czech Republic.” World Political Science 11 (1): 157-185, https:// doi.org/10.1515/wps-2015-0004. Kupka, P., V. Naxera. 2023. “Looking Back on Corruption: Representations of Corruption and Anti-corruption Measures in Czech Party Manifestos between 1990-2017.” SocidlnistudialSocial Studies (in print). Kupka, P., V. Walach, K. Tvrdâ. 2021. “Profit, or Power? Towards a Construction of Organized Crime in Czech Policy.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 66: 1-10, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100489. Kupka, P., V. Walach, V. DiviJova. 2022. “From Legal Definitions to Ethnic Identities: Representations of Organized Crime in Czech Policy Documents.” Trends in Organized Crime (on-line first), https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1007/s 12117-022-09449-y. Laclau, E. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso. Laclau, E. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” Pp. 32-50 in F. Panizza (ed.). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso. Laclau, E., Ch. Mouffe. 1984. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso. Lambropoulou, E. 2012. “Corruption Discourse as a Wild Card: Politics and Media in Greece and the “Modern” Triumphalism of Anti-Corruption.” In D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos (eds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge. Lampert, N. 1985. Whistle-blowing in the Soviet Union: Complaints and Abuses Under State Socialism.
London: Palgrave Macmillan. Larsson, A. O. 2016. “Online, All the Time? A Quantitative Assessment of the Permanent Campaign on Facebook.” New Media Society 18 (2): 274-292, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538798. Ledeneva, A. 2009. “Corruption in Postcommunist Societies: A Re-examination.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10 (1): 69-86, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15705850802700017. Ledeneva, A., R. Bratu, P. Köker. 2017. “Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches.” Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 1-20, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.L0001. Linek, L. 2010. Kam se ztratili volici? Vysvëtleni vÿvoje volebni ucasti v Ceske republice V letech 1990-2010 [Where Did the Voters Go? Explanation of the Development of Voter Turnout in the Czech Republic in the Years 1990-2010]. Brno: CDK. Lubbers, Μ., Μ. Gijsberts, P. Scheepers. 2002. “Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345-378, https:// doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00015. Lucardie, P. 2000. “Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors: Towards a Theory on the Emergence of New Parties.” Party Politics 6 (2): 175-185, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1354068800006002003. Mair, P., C. Mudde. 1998. “The Party Family and Its Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 211-229, https://doi.Org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.l.l.211. Manucci, L., E. Weber. 2017. “Why the Big Picture Matters: Political and Media Populism in Western Europe Since the 1970s.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 313-334,
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr. 12267. Mares, L, L. Young. 2020. “Buying, Expropriating and Stealing Votes.” Pp. 55-74 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of
104 Bibliography Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00012. Markovska, A., A. Serdyuk. 2014. “Analysing Media Representation of Corruption in Ukraine: Who Is Panicking?” Pp. 121-138 in P. C. van Duyne, J. Harvey, G. A. Antonopoulos, K. von Lampe, A. Maljevié, A. Markovska (eds.). Corruption, Greed and Crime-Money: Sleaze and Shady Economy in Europe and Beyond. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers. Marquette, H. 2003. Corruption, Politics and Development: The Role of the World Bank. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Maskarinec, P. 2013. “Prostorovâ analÿza prczidentskÿch voleb v Ceské republice v roce 2013 [Spatial Analysis of the 2013 Czech Presidential Elections].” Sociolôgia 45 (5): 435-469. MaSkarinec, P. 2017. “The Czech Pirate Party in the 2010 and 2013 Parliamentary Elections and the 2014 European Parliament Elections: Spatial Analysis of Voter Support.” Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 17 (1): 5-33, https://doi.org/10.1515/ sjps-2017-0001. Maskarinec, P. 2019. “The Rise of New Populist Political Parties in Czech Parliamentary Elections Between 2010 and 2017: The Geography of Party Replacement.” Eurasian Geography and Economics BQ (5): 511-547, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928. Maskarinec, P. 2020. “Crossing the Left-Right Party Divide? Understanding the Electoral Success of the Czech Pirate Party in the 2017 Parliamentary elections.” Politics 40 (4): 510-526, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0263395720920768. Maskarinec, R, P. Blaha. 2014. “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Grievance Theory and the Rise of New Political
Parties in the 2010 and 2013 Czech Parliamentary Elections.” Sociolôgia 46 (6): 706-731. Maskarinec, R, V. Naxera. 2022. “The Pirates of Czechia: The Curse of Preferential Vote.” Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 22 (1): 5-24, https://doi.org/10.34135/ sjps.220101. Matthes, C.-Y. 2016. “Comparative Assessments of the State of Democracy in EastCentral Europe and Its Anchoring in Society.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (5-6): 323-334, https://doi.rog/10.1080/10758216.2016.1201771. Median. 2019. “Volebni model -srpen 2019 azprosinec 2019 [Electoral Model August 2019 to December 2019].” [online] Median [retrieved 18-06-22]. Available at: http:// showme.median.ez/snemovni-volby/#/model. Meijers, Μ. J., A. Zaslove. 2021. “Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 372-147, https://doi. org/10.1177/0010414020938081. Mendilow, J. 2021. “Introduction to Populism and Corruption.” Pp. 1-35 in J. Mendilow, E. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109 676.00008. Mendilow, J., E. Phélippeau (eds.). 2021. Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978183 9109676. Mincigrucci, R., A. Stanziano. 2018. “How Corruption Coverage Harms Italy’s Society.” [online] European Journalism Observatory [retrieved 8. 8. 2022]. Available at: https://en.ejo.ch/research/the-journalistic-coverage-of-corruption-in-italy-anexample-of-penal-populism.
Bibliography 105 Moffitt, В. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9780804799331. Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541-563, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j. 1477-7053.2004.00135.x. Mudde, C. 2007. The Populist Radical Right in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511492037 . Mudde, C. 2017. SYRIZA. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-47479-3. Mudde, C. 2021. “Populism in Europe: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism (The Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2019).” Government and Opposition 56: 577-597, https://doi.org/10.1017/ gov.2021.15 Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2012. “Populism and (Liberal) Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” Pp. 1-26 in C. Mudde, C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds.). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective to Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139152365.002. Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48 (2): 1-28, https://doi.Org/l0.1017/gov.2012.l 1. Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234 874.001.000. Mudde, C„ C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and
Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667-1693, https://doi.org/10.1177/00104 14018789490. Müller, К. В. 2012. “KmotFi, dârky a modern! byrokracie: diiCi shrnuti a dvë kritické poznâmky к sociâlnim studiim lobbing [Godfathers, Gifts, and Modern Bureaucracy: Partial Summary and Two Critical Remarks on the Social Studies of Lobbing].” A eta Fakultyfilozofické Zâpadoceské univerzity v Plzni / West Bohemian review of Social Sciences Humanities 4 (3): 81-101. Muller, К. В. 2016. “К Сети instituée? Jsme pfeci sami slusni lidé! PFi iiny, dùsledky a Feseni nedûvëry v zastupitelské sbory v Cesku [Why Institutions? We Are Indeed АП Decent People! Causes, Consequences and Solutions of Distrust in Representative Bodies in the Czech Republic].” Politologickà RevuetCzech Political Science Review 22(1): 5-39. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., Μ. Fazekas. 2020. “How to Define and Measure Corruption.” Pp. 7-26 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/ 10.4337/9781789905007.00008. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., P. Μ. Heywood. 2020. “Making Sense of Corruption Studies: An Introduction.” Pp. 2-6 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https:// doi.org/10.4337/9781789905007.00007. Naxera, V. 2013. “Patterns of Corruption, Clientelism, and Party Patronage in Communist and Post-Communist Societies in Central Europe.” Politics in Central Europe 9 (1): 47-68.
106 Bibliography Naxera, V. 2015a. “Corruption Perception in the Czech Republic.” Politics in Central Europe 11 (1): 51-73, https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2015-0001 Naxera, V. 2015b. Korupce v komunistickém rezimu a v prûbëhu postkomunistické transformace. Studie korupcnich, klientelistickych a patronâznich jevü z prostfedi CeskoslovenskalCeské republiky [Corruption in the Communist Regime and During the Post-Communist Transformation. The Study of Corrupt, Clientelistic, and Patronage Phenomena from the Environment of Czechoslovakia!Czech Republic], Brno: Doplnëk. Naxera, V. 2015c. “Vefejné nebo soukromé? Pfispëvek do debaty о charakteru korupinich a klientelistickych jevù [Public or Private? The Contribution to the Discussion on the Nature of Corrupt and Clientelistic Phenomena].” StredICentre 7(1): 117-128 Naxera, V. 2015d. “Zobrazovâni korupce v programatice Ceskÿch politickÿch stran V prûbëhu postkomunistického vÿvoje [Perception of Corruption in the Electoral Programs of the Czech Political Parties during the Post-Communist Development].” Politické vedylPolitical Sciences 18 (1): 57-85. Naxera, V. 2017. “Democracy, Corruption and (in)security: A Theoretical Interpretation and Several Observations from the Czech Environment.” Pp. 78-88 in Security Forum 2017. Conference Proceedings. Banskâ Bystrica: Interpolis. Naxera, V. 2018. “The Never-Ending Story: Czech Governments, Corruption and Populist Anti-Corruption Rhetoric (2010-2018).” Politics in Central Europe 14 (3): 31-54, https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0017 . Naxera, V. 2019. ‘“Islamophobia without Muslims’: Anti-
Muslim and Anti-Arab Attitudes in Czech Society (Introductory Remarks).” Pp. 251-267 in S. Gardocki, R. Ozarowski, R. Ulatowski (eds.). The Islamic World in International Relations. Berlin: Peter Lang. Naxera, V. 2021a. “Corruption in the Czech Republic: An Overview.” Pp. 28^49 in T. A. Barabâs (ed.). Distinguishing Criteria between Petty and High-Ranking Corruption: Countries Case Studies . Budapest: National Institute of Criminology. Naxera, V. 2021b. ‘“Let us blow them down!’: Corruption as the subject of (non-) populist communication of the Czech Pirate Party.” Politics (on-line first), https:// doi.org/10.1177/02633957211010984. Naxera, V. 2021c. Od kritiky postsocialistické privatizace po nästup protikorupcnich hnuti. Téma korupce v komunikaci aktérü polistopadové ceské politiky [From the Criticism of Post-Socialist Privatisation to the Arrival of Anti-Corruption Movements. The Topic of Corruption within the Communication of Post-Revolution Czech Politicians]. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia Press. Naxera, V. 2022a. “A Few Populist Statements Don’t Make a Populist? The Issue of Corruption in (non-)populist Communication of Czech President Milos Zeman.” Pp. 53-66 in S. Kukovië, P. Just (eds.). The Rise of Populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Naxera, V. 2022b. “Smërem к principùm populistické komunikace? Téma korupce ve volebnich programech ëeskÿch politickÿch stran [Towards the Principles of Populist Communication? The Topic of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties].” Sociologicky casopis!Czech
Sociological Review 58 (2): 181-204, https://doi. org/10.13060/csr.2022.015. Naxera, V. 2022c. “The Germans as a Threat to ‘Us’? The Use of History and Othering of Germans in the Speeches of the Czech President Milos Zeman.” Pp. 135-156 in C. Schapkow, F. Jacob (eds.). Nationalism and Populism: Expressions of Fear
Bibliography 107 or Political Strategies? Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110729740-007. Naxera, V., О. Stulik. 2022. “‘I Will Handle It Personally’: The Neo-patrimonial Rhetoric of the Czech Prime Minister in the Times of COVID-19.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (3): 474-486, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782 804.2021.1911789. Naxera, V., P. KrCâl. 2018. “‘This is a Controlled Invasion’: The Czech President Milos Zeman’s Populist Perception of Islam and Immigration as Security Threats.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory Language Politics 12 (2): 192-215, https://doi. org/10.2478/jnmlp-2018-0008. Naxera, V., P. Krtâl. 2019. ‘“You Can’t Corrupt Eight Million Voters’: Corruption as a Topic in Milos Zeman’s Populist Strategy.” Studies of Transition States and Societies} 1 (1):3-18. Naxera, V, P. Kröäl. 2020. Ostrovy deviacc’ v populistické rétorice Milose Zemana (“The Isles of Deviation” in Populist Rhetorics of Milos Zeman].” Sociolôgia 52 (1): 82-99, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.l.4. Naxera, V, V. Glied, O. Filipec, Μ. Kaczorowska. 2020. “‘To Protect National Sovereignty from the ELI?’ The 2019 EP Elections and Populist Parties in V4 Countries.” Revista UNISC154-. 71-106, https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-98. Nordensvard, Μ., J. Kctola. 2022. “Populism as an Act of Storytelling: Analyzing the Climate Change Narratives of Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg as Populist Truth-tellers.” Environmental Politics 31 (5): 861-882, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09644016.2021.1996818. Norris, R, G. Evans. 1999. “Introduction: Understanding
Electoral Change.” Pp. xixxl in G. Evans, P. Norris (eds.). Critical Elections: British Partiesand Voters in LongTerm Perspective. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218518.nl5 . Novotny, L., D. Sarovec. 2021. “Contemporary Pirate Parties in the Post-Material Era: Comparing Success Cases.” Studia Politico. Romanian Political Science Review 21 (1): 29-51. Nye, J. S. 1989. “Corruption and Political Development. A Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Pp. 963-984 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Obydenkova, A., B. Arpino. 2018. “Corruption and Trust in the European Union and National Institutions: Changes over the Great Recession across European States.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (3): 594-611, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms. 12646. Orr, G. 2006. “Suppressing Vote-Buying: the ‘War’ on Electoral Bribery from 1868.” The Journal of Legal History 27 (3): 289-314, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144036060 1041142. 0stbo Kuldova, T, T. Rayem, J. 0stbo. 2021. “Editorial. Corruption and the Moral Economy of Fraud.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): i-iv, https://doi.org/ 10.5617/jea.9625. Otjes, S. 2020. “All on the Same Boat? Voting for Pirate Parties in Comparative Perspective.” Politics 40 (I): 38-53, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0263395719833274. Pauwels, T. 2011. “Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (1): 97119, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1080/17457289.2011.539483. Pavlova, E. 2020. “Corrupt
Governance: Self-defeating Anti-corruption Rhetoric and Initiatives in Russia.” New Perspectives 28 (2): 205-222, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2336825X20911513.
108 Bibliography Philp, Μ. 2006. “Corruption Definition and Measurement.” Pp. 45-79 in Ch. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, F. Galtung (eds.). Measuring Corruption. Routledge. Pierce, S. 2006. “Looking Like a State: Colonialism and the Discourse of Corruption in Northern Nigeria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 48 (4): 887-914, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417506000338. Pink, Μ., A. Folvariny. 2020. “The Czech Pirate Party: A New Alternative, Not Only for the Young.” Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 6 (4): 176-196, https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v6i4.610. Plattner, Μ. F. 2010. “Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 81-92, https://doi.Org/10.1353/jod.0.0154. Polk, J. et al. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research Politics 4 (1): 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1177/205316801 6686915. Pop-Eleches, G. 2010. “Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism.” World Politics 62 (2): 221-260, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0043887110000043. Popping, R. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse Using Semantic Text Analysis: A Comment.” Quality Quantity 52:2163-2172, https://doi.org/10.1007/ si 1135-017-0651-z. Powell, E. N., J. A. Tucker. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123-147, https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341200 0531. Pujas, V, Μ. Rhodes.
1999. “Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain and France.” West European Politics 22 (3): 41-63, https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238990 8425315. Pytlas, B. 2022. ‘“Fix the System!’ Variations of Anti-establishment Normalisation Strategies in Comparative Perspective.” Politics (on-line first), https://doi.org/ 10.1177/02633957221089219. Reed, Q. 1999a. “Korupce v privatizaci öeskou cestou [Corruption in the Privatization in the Czech Way].”Pp. 159-204 in P. Fri6(ed.). Korupce naceskÿzpùsob [Corruption in the Czech Way]. Prague: G plus G. Reed, Q. 1999b. “Politicka korupce v postkomunistické spoleünosti [Political Corruption in the Post-communist Society].” Pp. 116-158 in P. Friö (ed.). Korupce na ceskÿ zpùsob [Corruption in the Czech Way], Prague: G plus G. Reinemann, C., T. Aalberg, F. Esser, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese. 2017. “Populist Political Communication: Toward a Model of Its Causes, Forms, and Effects.” Pp. 12-25 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Roberts, A. 2019. “Czech Billionaires as Politicians.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 434-444, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1490652 . Robinson, N. 2013. “Economic and Political Hybridity: Patrimonial Capitalism in the post-Soviet Sphere.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 4 (2): 136-145, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euras.2013.03.003. Rooduijn, Μ. 2018. “What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties.” European Political Science Review 10 (3): 351368,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.
Bibliography 109 Rooduijn, Μ. 2019. “State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (1): 362-372, https://doi.Org/10.l 111/1475-6765.12314. Rooduijn, Μ., S. L. de Lange, W. van der Brug. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics 20 (4): 563-575, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1177/1354068811436065. Rooduijn, Μ., T. Pauwels. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1272-1283, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01402382.2011.616665. Rossc-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB097 81139175098. Rusciano, F. L. 2021. “Populism and the Corruption Pluralist Governance Structures.” Pp. 37-56 in J. Mcndilow, E. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption: The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/ 9781839109676.00010. Sajô, A. 2003. “From Corruption to Extortion: Conteptualization of Post-communist Corruption.” Crime, Law and Social Change 40 (2-3): 171-194, https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1025736621543. Sampson, S. 2010. “The Anti-corruption Industry: From Movement to Institution.” Global Crime 11 (2): 261-278, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1080/17440571003669258 . Sampson, S. 2011. “Integrity Warriors: Global Morality and the Anti-corruption Movement in the Balkans.” Pp. 314-349 in Μ. Johnston (ed.). Public Sector Corruption, Vol. I. London: SAGE
Publications Inc. Sandholtz, W, R. Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture, and Communism.” International Review of Sociology 15 (1): 109-131, https://doi.org/10.1080/039067 00500038678. Sârovcc, D. 2018. “Nâstup novÿch politickÿch stran v ÖR od roku 2013: hnuti ANO 2011 a Ùsvit ph mé demokracie pohledem konceptu novosti [The Emergence of New Political Parties in the Czech Republic: ANO 2011 and Dawn of Direct Democracy through the Concept of Newness].” Sociolôgia 50 (1): 78-113. Sârovec, D. 2019a. “Assured Newcomers on a Squally Sea? The Czech Pirate Party before and after the 2017 Elections.” Acta Fakulty filozofické Zâpadoceské Univerzity v PlznilWest Bohemian Review of Social Sciences ά Humanities 11 (2): 121, https://doi.Org/10.24132/actaff.2019.l 1.2.1. Särovec, D. 2019b. “Is the ‘New’ always ‘New’? Theoretical Framework Problems of New Political Parties’ Research: The Czech Republic Experience.” Politics in Central Europe 15 (1): 55-80, https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0003. Schedler, A. 1996. “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties.” Party Politics 2 (3): 291-312, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1080/00344893.2019.1643770. Schumacher, G., K. van Kersbergen. 2016. “Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?” Party Politics 22 (3): 300-312, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345. Schwörer, J. 2021. The Growth of Populism in the Political Mainstream: The Contagion Effects of Populist Messages on Mainstream Parties Communication. Cham: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72449-8. Schwörer, J. 2022. “Less Populist in Power? Online
Communication of Populist Parties in Coalition Governments.” Government Opposition 57 (3): 467-489, https://doi. org/10.1017/gov.2021.2.
110 Bibliography Scott, J. C. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall, Inc. Shafir, Μ. 2021. “Corruption and Populism in East-Central Post-communist Europe: the Egg, the Hen and the Omelet.” Pp. 153-189 in J. Mendilow, É. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption: The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109676.00016 . Sicakova-Beblava, E., Μ. Beblavy. 2016. “Using Government Manifestos to Analyse the Political Salience and Shape of Anti-corruption Policies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Policy Studies 37 (4): 295-313, https://doi.org/10.1080/01442 872.2016.1146247. Sikk, A. 2012. “Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties.” Party Politics 18 (4): 465-486, https://doi.org/10J 177/1354068810389631. Skolnik, Μ. 2020a. “Corruption and Political Participation: A Review.” Sociitlni studialSocialStudies 17 (1): 89-104, https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2020-l-89. Skolnik, Μ. 2020b. “Korupce a dûvéra vc vefcjnou sprâvu v postkomunistické Evropê [Corruption and Trust in Public Administration in Post-communist Europe].” Acta Politologica 12(1): 20-39, https://doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/25_2019. Skolnik, Μ. 2021. “Korupce v Ceské republice-dosavadni stav bâdâni [Corruption in the Czech Republic - the State of the Discipline].” Acta Politologica 13 (2): 22-38, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.14712/1803-8220/31 _2020. Skolnik, Μ., Μ. Haman, J. Copik. 2022. “Do Free Food and Beverages Bring People to the Political Meeting? The Survey Experiment of Attendance-Buying.” Political Studies Review 20 (4):
691-701, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 177/14789299211047333. Skvarenina, О., V. Havlik, V. Dostâlovâ. 2021. “Migration, Corruption, and Ideological Centrism: Explanations of Anti-Establishment Attitudes in the Czech Republic.” Sociolögia 53 (3): 287-308, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2021.53.3.l 1. SlaCâlek, О. 2021. “Czech Republic: Populism without Culture Wars?” Pp. 158-202 in P. Barsa, Z. Hesovâ, O. SlaCâlek (eds.). Central European Culture Wars: Beyond Post-Communism and Populism. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts. Slomczynski, K., G. Shabad. 2012. “Perceptions of Political Party Corruption and Voting Behaviour in Poland.” Party Politics 18 (6): 897-917, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1354068810393266. Smilov, D., R. Dorsiev. 2012. “Corruption in Bulgaria: Contested Perceptions, Shared Disappointment.” Pp. 237-260 in D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannaopulos (eds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge Stanley, J. 2018. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Random House. Stanyer, J., S. Salgado, J. Strömbäck. 2017. “Populist Actors as Communicators or Political Actors as Populist Communicators: Cross-national Findings and Perspectives.” Pp. 353-364 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Stavrakakis, Y. 2004. “Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253-267, https://doi.org/10.1080/135693I042000263519. Stojarovâ, V. 2018.
“Populist, Radical and Extremist Political Parties in Visegrad Countries vis à vis the Migration Crisis. In the Name of the People and the Nation in Central Europe.” Open Political Science 1 (1): 32-45, https://doi.org/10.1515/ope nps-2018-0001.
Bibliography 111 Stone, J. R. Jr. 2022. Populism, Eco-populism, and the Future of Environmentalism. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003264224 . StrapäCova, Μ., V. Hlousek. 2018. “Anti-Islamism without Moslems: Cognitive Frames of Czech Antimigrant Politics.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory Language Polities 12(1): 1-30. Stritzel, H. 2014. Security in Translation. Securitization Theory and the Localization of Threat. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307576_4. Stulik, O. 2016. “Diskurzivni analyza Nârodnich listû: nârod vs. islam a Laclauuv populistickÿ matrix [A Discursive Analysis of Narodni listy: Nation vs. Islam and the Laclau Matrix].” Stfedoevropské politick!’ Studie!Central European Political Studies Review 17 (2-3): 223-252, https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2015.23.223. Stulik, O. 2019. “Do We Have all the Necessary Data? The Challenge of Measuring Populism through Metaphors.” Quality Quantity 53: 2653-2670, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/sl 1135-019-00878-6. Stulik, O. 2022. “Recognising and Applying Equivalent Meanings: An Example of Creating a Codebook from a Language-Game of Extremism in the Czech Republic.” Quality Quantity (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1007/sl 113 5-022-01418-5. Stulik, O., J. Paleick. 2021. “‘Recall’ as an Empty Signifier - The Problem of SPD Party Populism.” Stadia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review 21 (2): 521-540. Stulik, O., P. Krial. 2019. “Surfovani na migraini νΐηύ v dob£ populismu: Sekuritizacc migrace ze strany poslancù Parlamcntu Ccské rcpubliky [Surfing on the Migration Wave in the Age
of Populism: Securitization of Migration by Deputies of Czech Parliamentary].” Acta Politologica 11 (1): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.14712/18038220/8_2019. Stulik, О., V. Naxera. 2022. “One Flew Over the Stork’s Nest’: Neo-patrimonial Populism of Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis.” Journal of Comparative Politics 15 (2): 39-55. Taggart, P. A. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press. Tänzler, D.,K. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos. 2012. “The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe: An Introduction.” In D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos (cds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge. Timmer, A. D., D. Docka-Filipek. 2018. “Enemies of the Nation: Understanding the Hungarian State’s Relationship to Humanitarian NGOs.” Journal of International Global Studies 9 (2): 40-57. Tumber, H., S. R. Waisbord (eds.). 2004. Political Scandals and Media Across Democracies, Volumes I II. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Udeh, P. 2004. “Centrist Populism as a New Competitive and Mobilization Strategy in Slovak Politics.” Pp. 45-73 in O. Gyarfâsovâ, G. Meseznikov (eds.). Party Government in Slovakia: Experience and Perspectives. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs. UCeft, P. 2007. “Parties, Populism, and Anti-establishment Politics in East Central Europe.” SAIS Review 27 (1): 49-62, https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2007.0021 . Urbinati, N. 2017. “Antiestablishment and the Substitution of the Whole with One of Its Parts.” Pp. 77-97 in C. de la Torre (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London: Routledge,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-7. Uslaner, E. Μ. 2004. “Trust and Corruption.” Pp. 90-106 in J. H. Lambsdorff, Μ. Taube, Μ. Schramm. The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Abingdon: Routledge.
112 Bibliography Uslaner, E. M. 2008. Corruption. Inequality, and the Rule ofLaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511510410. Vachudova, Μ. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318-340, https://doi.org/10.1080/21599 165.2020.1787163. Vodovâ, P., P. Voda. 2020. “The Effects of Deliberation in Czech Pirate Party: The Case of Coalition Formation in Brno (2018).” European Political Science 19 (2): 181-189, https://doi.org/I0.1057/s41304-019-00233-l . Walter, J. 1988. “Law as an Instrument of Economic Regulation: Economic Crime in Czechoslovakia 1947-1987.” Review of Socialist Law 3 (14): 209-239, https://doi. org/10.1163/187529888X00130. Walters, W. 2008. “Anti-policy and Anti-politics: Critical Reflections on Certain Schemes to Govern Bad Things.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 1 1 (3): 267— 288, https://doi.org/10.! 177/1367549408091844. Weber, Μ. 1998. “Politika jako povolâni [Politics as a Vocation].” Pp. 246-196 in Μ. Weber, Μ. Havelka. Metodologie, sociologie, politika [Methodology, Sociology, Politics!. Prague: ΟΙΚΟΥΜΕΝΗ. Weber, Μ. 2006. “Bureaucracy.” Pp. 49-70 in A. Sharma, A. Gupta (eds.). The Anthropology of the State. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Wedel, J. R. 2001. “‘State’ and ‘Private’: Up against the Organizational Realities of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Trends in Organized Crime 7 ( 1 ): 6-46, https://doi.org/!0.1007/s 12117-001-1013-7. Wedel, J. R. 2012. “Rethinking Corruption in an Age of Ambiguity.” Annual Review of Law and
Social Science 8: 453-498, https://doi.Org/10.l 146/annurcv.lawsocsci.093 008.131558. White, D. 2018. “State Capacity and Regime Resilience in Putin’s Russia.” International Political Science Review 39 (1): 130-143, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0192512117694481. Windt, TO. Jr. 1986. “Presidential Rhetoric: Definition of a Field of Study.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 16(1): 330-348. Wintr, J., Μ. Antos, J. Kysela. 2016. “Direct Election of the President and Its Constitutional and Political Consequences.” Acta Politologica 8 (2): 145-163. Zulianello, Μ. 2018. “Mobilizing Young Voters? A Cross-National Analysis of Contextual Factors in Pirate Voting.” European Politics and Society 19 (3): 282298, https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2017.1419666. Zulianello, Μ. 2020. “Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries.” Government and Opposition 55: 327-347, https://doi.org/10.1017/ gov.2019.21. Zulianello, Μ., A. Albertini, D. Ceccobelli. 2018. “A Populist Zeitgeist“! The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook.” The International Journal of Press!Politics 23 (4): 439-457, https://doi. org/10.1177/1940161218783836. Zulianello, Μ., D. Ceccobelli. 2020. “Don’t Call It Climate Populism: On Greta Thunberg’s Technocratic Ecocentrism.” Political Quarterly 91 (3): 623-631, https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12858. Zulianello, Μ., E. G. Larsen. 2021. “Populist Parties in European Parliament Elections: A New Dataset on Left, Right and
Valence Populism from 1979 to 2019.” Electoral Studies 71: 1-8, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102312.
Index Note’. Figures are indicated by italics. Tables are indicated by bold. Endnotes are indicated by the page number followed by ‘n’ and the endnote number e.g., 20nl refers to endnote 1 on page 20. Agrofert 7, 17, 39n29, 41, 62nl2, 89 ANO 3, 6, 17, 21,22, 25, 32, 33, 41, 46-8, 56, 59, 59n2, 68, 69, 71,73, 74, 75, 78-81,87n5, 88,90 anti-elitism 43, 52, 58, 60n5, 67, 89, 90 Babis, A. 3, 5, 7, 8, 17, 22-6, 33, 34n4, 35nl 1, 39n29, 39n34,41,42, 46-8, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 59n2, 60n5, 61 n 11, 61nl2, 63nl9, 74, 80-5, 81,83, 84, 87n5, 88-90, 91n2 Bârta, V. 41,42,45,46, 59n2 Berlusconi, S. 60n5 bribe 8, 12, 13, 19, 23, 34n2, 34n3, 37n25, 37n26; bribery 11,34n2, 34n3, 34n6, 34n7, 34nl0, 35nl8, 38n28,45, 68, 81, 89; bribe-taking 8 Brussels 8, 20, 53, 60n5, 62nl2, 84 bureaucracy 10, 19, 34n7 businessman 21, 33, 38n28,41,42, 56, 88 capitalism 31 capture 13, 18, 65 Chamber of Deputies 24, 31, 32, 39n29, 39n30,40n39,40n41,45, 47, 48, 55, 59nl, 67, 74, 76n3, 77, 81, 87n5, 90 Christian and Democratic UnionCzechoslovak People’s Party see KDU-CSL Civic Democratic Party see ODS clientelism 10, 11,24, 34n6, 37n27, 57, 68,81 collusion 34n6, 68, 81 communication 3-6, 14, 26, 42,44, 53, 56, 59, 67, 80, 81, 92n4, 92n5; Babis’s 35nl 1,46, 86; mainstream 3, 75; Pirate 6, 77-9, 83, 85, 86, 87n5, 87n6, 87n8, 90; populist 2, 3, 17, 23,44,45, 48-51, 58, 60nl0, 64-71, 74, 76n6, 81-5, 90 communism 1,18 Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia see KSCM conservatism 13 corruption: constructivist approach to 11-14, 18, 53; definition 7-11, 53; fight against 1, 2, 12-14, 16, 18-20, 38n28, 50, 52, 55,57, 58,
65,69, 74,85,91; perceptions of 27, 28, 31, 32, 39n35, 51-3, 64 COVID-19 7, 15,47 crime 18; economic 11, 15, 18, 26, 39n29; organised 15, 17, 18, 20, 34n9, 38n28, 89 crisis: economic 7, 31,39n35; financial 65; immigration 92n4; pandemic 7, 47; refugee 48 CSSD 8, 15, 18-20, 26, 31, 32, 34n3, 36nl6, 36nl9, 39n34,40n39,47-9, 59, 62nl4,71,72,73, 90, 91,92n4 Czech Pirate Party see pirates Czech Social Democratic Party see CSSD Dalik, Μ. 37n26 Dawn 32, 33, 47, 48, 57, 71, 73, 74, 87n5 democracy 28, 31,48, 57, 59n3, 63nl6, 66, 88; direct 21,32, 33,43,48, 50, 56, 57, 82, 87n5, 90; intra-party 80; liberal 11, 58; representative 48, 58, 85, 90
114 Index discourse 12, 34n5,44, 66, 80; academic 4; analysis of 68; of corruption 5, 11, 28; populist 5, 14,21,43,44, 52, 79, 89; types of 18, 20, 21,33, 52, 91 distrust 16, 20, 29, 45, 77, 78, 86n2 election 3,6,7, 11, 17-22,27,28, 31-3, 34n3, 36nl6, 36n!7, 36n21, 37n24n 37n26n 37n27, 39n29, 40n36, 40n39, 41,42, 45-50, 54-7, 62n 14; 52, 63nl5, 63nl8, 64-8, 70, 71, 74, 75, 75nl, 77, 78,80,81,83-5, 87n5, 87n6, 87n7, 88, 90, 91, 92n4; first-order 45, 77; municipal 40n41; presidential 42, 49, 53, 62nl3, 62nl4; second-order 77, 78 elite: corrupt/bad 2, 5,12, 17, 21-3, 28, 33,41-3, 46, 48, 50, 52-4, 56-8, 60n5, 62nl4, 64, 69-71, 76n7, 81-6, 89-91; cultural 43, 54, 58, 63nl7, 86; economic 18, 33, 41, 60n5, 63n 17, 75, 86; foreign 49, 62nl2, 84; new 27; political 1, 12, 21, 23, 32, 33, 43, 45, 47,48,51,54-6, 60n5, 80 elitism 59n3 embezzlement 34n6, 68, 81 entrepreneur 17, 41-3, 45,46, 54, 62nl2 expert 12, 21,48, 90; governments of 58; legitimacy 56; solutions 56; surveys 44, 68 Facebook 53, 54, 57, 66, 67, 78, 80, 82 familism 34n6, 68, 81 favouritism 34n6, 68, 81 Fortuyn, P. 43, 60n5 Freedom and Direct Democracy see SPD gift-giving 34n7 godfather 21,23, 37, 38, 39n31,41,42, 46,48, 54, 69-71,88, 92n6 grievance theory 40n37 Havel, V. 15, 50 hegemony 61nl0 ideational approach 2,43,44, 60n4, 61n7, 61nl0, 69 immigration 15, 40n37,47,48, 53, 61n6, 63nl6, 65, 75,80, 92n4 inequality 40n38 Kalousek, Μ. 24, 25 KDU-CSL 20, 31,40n39,71,72,73 kick-back 34n6, 68, 81 Klaus, V. 16, 19, 35nl5, 36nl5, 36nl6, 36nl9, 37n24, 37n25, 37n27, 50,91nl KSÙM 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 31,40n39,47, 48, 55, 56, 59,
63nl7, 71,72,73, 76n7, 90,91 lobbyist 19-21, 23, 37n26, 69-71 mafia 20,21,48, 56, 80 Manichean 43, 82, 89; division 35nl5, 52, 59n3,70,91n3 manifesto 14, 17-19, 21,34n3, 36nl6, 36n23, 36n24,45, 48, 49, 55-7, 63nl8, 64-9, 71,72, 74, 75, 75n3, 76n4, 76n7; see also programme MaxQda 68, 81 Mayors and Independents see STAN media 10, 12, 19, 20, 24, 26, 37n26, 38n28,45,46,51,52, 54, 57, 58, 63nl7, 84, 92n6; Babies 51,74; corrupt 53; new 10; social 51,61n8, 67,80 metaphor 10, 34n8, 68 migration 66, 70, 84, 92n4 movement 3, 17, 23-5, 32, 33,40n41, 40n42,41,46, 59n2, 69, 70, 78, 80, 81, 88-91 Nagygate affaire 21,23,24, 33n 1, 36nl7, 38n28, 39n32, 39n33,42, 55, 91nl nativism 4, 45, 48, 60n6, 66, 75, 92n4 Naygovâ, J. 38n28 Neöas, P. 21, 23, 54, 36nl7, 38n28, 47, 55, 59nl,91nl neoliberalism 13, 18-21, 33, 34n5,45, 52, 55, 58,91n3,92n3 neo-patrimonialism see patrimonialism nepotism 9, 34n6, 68, 81 newness 30, 45; project of 30 NGOs 12, 54, 58 ODS 7, 19-21,24, 31-3, 34n3, 34n5, 36nl6, 36nl7, 37n25, 37n26, 37n27, 38n28,40n39,40n41,45-7,49, 55, 72, 73, 89,91nl,92n6 officials 9-12,19, 21, 51, 52, 56, 92n6; Brussels 19, 60n5; corrupt 33, 34n5, 37n25, 58, 92n3
Index Okamura, T. 2, 32, 33,40n35, 42, 47, 48, 53, 57, 58, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 87n5, 87n6 Oligarch 21,57, 58,71 opposition 1,3, 7, 14, 15, 21,27, 32, 33, 36nl6, 42,45, 47, 50, 58, 67, 73, 74, 77, 83, 87n7,88,91nl othering 61n6, 63nl6 party: anti-establishment 6, 6nl, 31, 32, 78, 85, 90; business-firm 33; left-wing 15, 18, 20,47, 62nl4, 75; mainstream/ established 3, 5, 14,41,46, 65,66, 75, 80, 90, 92n4, 92n5; new 28, 30-3, 40n38, 68, 77; pirate (see pirates); political 3, 4, 5, 7, 14, 16-18, 20-2, 24, 27, 28,29, 30, 34n2, 34n3, 36nl6, 36n 17, 37n25, 37n27,40n40,41,51, 53-7, 65, 67-70, 72, 73, 83, 87n5, 87n7, 88, 90, 91nl; populist 14, 17, 33, 41,45,47-9, 57, 59, 59n 1, 66, 71, 74, 75, 78, 79, 85; right-wing 20, 37n26, 47, 60n6, 61n6, 63nl8, 65, 67 patrimonialism 10, 35n 11; neopatrimonialism 35n 11,46, 62nl2, 89 patronage 10, 11 people: normal/ordinary 42,46, 50, 58, 62nl2, 82; people-centrism 43, 50, 60n6, 67, 90; pure/good 2, 14, 17,43, 46, 52-4, 60n6, 69-71, 76n7, 81, 86, 89; as sovereign/sovereignty of 43, 50, 62nlO, 71,82 pirates 3, 6, 26, 32, 40n42,47,48, 68, 71,73, 77-81, 81, 82-6, 83, 84, 86n2, 86n4, 87n5,87n7,90 pluralism 54, 59n3 politician 1,8-10, 12-17, 19, 21,23-5, 28, 30-2, 34n2, 38n28,40n35,40n36, 40n39, 41-4, 46-9, 51, 54-9, 61n6, 61 n7, 62nl3, 69-71,75n2, 77, 79, 80, 83, 85, 88, 90, 91, 92n5, 92n6; corrupt 12, 23, 31, 50, 53, 56, 80-2, 86, 92n3; populist 35nl 1, 39n33, 45, 58, 60n5, 65 populism 1,2, 4, 6, 6nl, 7, 13, 14, 21, 31,35nl 1,41-3, 45,49, 50, 56, 58, 59, 59n3, 60n4, 60n6, 61n6, 61n7, 61n8, 61n9, 61П10, 62nl5, 64-68, 70, 71, 74, 75, 77-79, 82,
83, 85, 86, 86n4, 90, 92n3, 92n4; centrist 6nl, 31,46, 86; conceptualisation of 2, 3, 5,44, 69, 75nl, 76n5; ethnopopulism 46; forms 115 of 4,43, 46; left-wing 43, 76n7; liberal 60n4,79; measuring 2,44,66, 68; mediated 51; right-wing 43,48, 51, 53, 55, 60n6, 61n6; technocratic 46, 56, 86; valence 46 privatisation 13, 15-18, 20, 36nl9, 36n20,71 programme 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 33, 36nl7,36n21,41,54, 57,64, 67, 71,74, 76n6, 76n8, 90; see also manifesto Public Affairs 32, 33,41,45,46, 51, 59n 1, 59n2; see also VV Rath, D. 8 referendum 42, 56, 57, 82 rhetoric: of political actors 14, 17, 18, 33, 35nl 1, 37n26, 39n35, 41,45-50, 56, 58, 60n5, 61 n9, 77, 79, 87n7, 91; anti-corruption 1-6, 11, 12, 17,27,30, 32, 35n 11, 36n22, 51,63n 16, 64, 65, 74, 75, 80, 82, 90; anti-establishment 31,32, 68, 78; nativist 61n6, 77; populist 41,42, 49, 52, 59, 61n4, 62nl3, 65,74, 90,91 Rusnok, J. 22, 55 signifier: empty 12, 14, 43, 58; floating 12, 43; without signified 12 Slachta, R. 23, 38n28, 90, 91 Sobotka, B. 74 socialism 13 SPD 3, 6, 21, 32, 33, 40n35, 40n41,47, 48, 53, 55-7, 59, 68, 71,73, 74, 78-81, 87n5, 87n7 SPR-RSC 45, 48, 72, 76n6 STAN 73, 87n7, 88, 89 Stork’s Nest 21, 24-6, 39n29 TOP09 18, 20, 25, 32, 37n26,40n39, 72, 73 Topolânek, Μ. 37n26, 45, 62nl3, 91nl transformation 2, 3,15, 30, 32,47, 62nll, 63nl5, 63nl6, 65, 66, 86n3; economic 20; post-socialist 17,18 transparency 7, 8, 20, 21, 55, 85 triplet 3, 69, 70, 81-5 Trump, D. 42, 60n5 trust 9, 27, 39n35,40n36, 52, 55, 56, 62nl5, 63nl5, 90 tunneling 15, 36nl9, 37n27
116 Index volatility 28, 30, 31, 33 VV 41,45, 46,48, 55, 57, 59, 59nl, 58, 70, 71,72, 74; see also Public Affairs welfare 71,92n6; chauvinism 47, 66 Bayerlacho Stastsbibilothes Zeitgeist 59, 65, 66, 90,92n4, 92n5 Zeman, Μ. 3, 5, 22, 26, 36n 16, 36nl9, 37n27, 39n31, 39n34,42,49, 50, 53, 55,57, 62nl3,62nl4
|
| adam_txt |
Contents vii x Preface List of Abbreviations 1 Introduction 1 (Anti-)corruption (not only) in the Czech way: on the road to populism? Defining corruption: a problem? 8 Constructivist approaches to (anti-)corruption 11 The formation of the concept of corruption in the Czech environment: development, ideologicalframeworks, and the rise ofpopulism 14 Perceptions of corruption, distrust and electoral success of new actors 27 ( Anti-)corruption and “new” political parties 28 Conclusion 33 2 Populism and anti-corruption What is populism? 42 Rise of populism in Czech politics 45 “Corrupt elite” as the core of the populist message 50 Conclusion 58 3 "Mainstreamisation of populists” and “mainstream inclination to populist principles”? The subject of corruption in the election manifestos of Czech political parties Populism and mainstream: a research overview 65 Input data, methodological procedure and operationalisation of the order of populist communication 67 7 41 64
vi Contents Analysis and interpretation of results 70 Conclusion 74 4 Populism, anti-corruption and the Czech Pirate Party Pirate politics, populism and anti-corruption 79 Data and methodology 80 Is the anti-corruption rhetoric of the Czech Pirates populist? 82 Conclusion 85 77 Concluding remarks 88 Bibliography Index 93 113
Bibliography Aalberg, T., F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese. 2017. Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315623016. Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, A. Zaslovc. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324-1353, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0010414013512600. Albertazzi, D. 2009. “Reconciling ‘Voice’ and ‘Exit’: Swiss and Italian Populists in Power.” Politics 29 (1): 1-10, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 111/j. 1467-9256.2008.01 332.x. Albertazzi, D., D. McDonnell. 2008. “The Sceptre and the Spectre.” Pp. 1-11 in D. Albertazzi, D. McDonnell (eds.). Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. New York: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780 230592100J. Anderson, Ch. J., Z. V. Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91-109, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00007. Antal, A. 2017. “The Political Theories, Preconditions and Dangers of the Governing Populism in Hungary.” Politologicky casopislCzech Journal of Political Science 24 ( 1 ): 5-20, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-1 -5. Arialy, G., E. Μ. Uslaner. 2017. “Corruption, Fairness, and Inequality.” International Political Science Review 38 (3): 349-362, https://doi.org/10.1177/019251211 6641091. Aslanidis, P. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse with Semantic Text Analysis: An Application on Grassroots Populist Mobilization.” Quality Quantity 52 (3):
12411263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11135-017-0517-4. Âslund, A. 2007. How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511790416 . Bach, D. C. 2011. “Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism: Comparative Trajectories and Readings.” Commonwealth Comparative Politics 49 (3): 275-294, https://doi. org/10.1080/14662043.2011.582731. Baez-Camargo, C., A. Ledeneva. 2017. “Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin? Informal Governance and the Public/Private Crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania.” Slavonic East European Review 95 (1): 49-75, https://doi.org/ 10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.1.0049.
94 Bibliography Bâgenholm, A. 2013. “Throwing the Rascals Out? The Electoral Effects of Corruption Allegations and Corruption Scandals in Europe 1981-2011.” Crime, Law and Social Change 60 (5): 595-609, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0611-013-9482-6. Bâgenholm, A., N. Charron. 2014. “Do Politics in Europe Benefit from Politicising Corruption?” (Vest European Politics 37 (5): 903-931, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01402382.2014.909164. Baggini, J. 2015. “The Populist Threat to Pluralism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5): 403-412, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1177/0191453714564460. Balaban, D. C., H. O. Vincze, Μ. Stoica, I. Madveschi. 2021. “The Populist Dimension of Mediated Discourses about Corruption in Romania.” Central European Journal of Communication 29 (2): 287-234, https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.14.2(29).5. Barr, R. R. 2009. “Populists, Outsiders and Anti-establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15 (1): 29-48, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1177/1354068808097890. Bauer, Μ. W., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit, S. Becker (eds.). 2021. Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies. Routledge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504 . Beasley-Murray, J. 2006. “On Populism Reason (Laclau), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (Panizza), Review.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 362-367, https:// doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300255. Becker, U., A. Vasileva. 2017. “Russia’s Political Economy Re-conceptualized: A Changing Hybrid of Liberalism, Statism and Patrimonialism. "Journal of Eurasian Studies 8: 83-96,
https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.euras.2016.l 1.003. Bcissinger, Μ. R., G. Sasse. 2014. “An End to “Patience”? The Great Recession and Economic Protest in Eastern Europe.” Pp. 334-370 in L. Bartels, N. Bermeo (eds.). Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.Org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357 505.003.0011. Berti, C., R. Bratu, S. Wickberg. 2020. “Corruption and the Media.” Pp. 107-117 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00015. Betz, H.-G., C. Johnson. 2004. “Against the Current - Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 311-327, https://doi.org/10.1080/135693104200 0263546. Bilek, J., J. Lysek, R. Zbiral. 2021. “Vêrni svému jménu? Jak politické strany mezery pûsobi v legislativnim procesu [True to Their Name? Activities of Niche Political Parties in the Legislative Process].” Sociologicky casopisICzech Sociological Review 57 (4): 433-454, https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2021.010. Boatright, R. G. 2020. “Populist Corruption Talk, and Some Alternatives.” Pp. 176184 in Μ. Nadesan, A. Ron (eds.). Mapping Populism: A Guide to Understanding and Studying Populism. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295 089-17. Bobba, G., C. Crémones, Μ. Mancosu, A. Seddone. 2018. “Populism and the Gender Gap: Comparing Digital Engagement with Populist and Non-populist Facebook Pages in France,
Italy, and Spain.” The International Journal of Press!Politics 23 (4): 458-475, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218787046. Bolleyer, N., C. Little, F. C. Von Nostitz. 2015. “Implementing Democratic Equality in Political Parties: Organisational Consequences in the Swedish and the German
Bibliography 95 Pirate Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 38 (2): 158-178, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9477.12044. Bossetta, Μ. 2017. “Fighting Fire with Fire: Mainstream Adoption of the Populist Political Style in the 2014 Europe Debates between Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (4): 715-734, https://doi. org/10.1177/1369148117715646. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511812507. Bratu, R., D. A. Sotiropoulos, Μ. Stoyanova. 2017. “Through the Lens of Social Constructionism: The Development of Innovative Anti-corruption Policies and Practices in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania, 2000-2015.” Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 117-150, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.L0117. Bratu, R., I. Kazoka. 2018. “Metaphors of Corruption in the News Media Coverage of Seven European Countries.” European Journal of Communication 33 (7): 57-72, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1177/0267323117750695. Brown, K., A. Mondon. 2021. “Populism, the Media, and the Mainstreaming of the Far Right: The Guardian’s Coverage of Populism as a Case Study.” Politics 41 (3): 279-295, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0263395720955036. Brunclik, Μ. 2016. “Three Technocratic Cabinets in the Czech Republic: A Symptom of Party Failure?” Politics in Central Europe 12 (2): 7-28, https://doi.org/10.1515/ pcc-2016-0010. Bruscnbauch Meislovâ, Μ., D. Marek. 2022. “‘It’s the EU’s Fault!’Strategies of Blame Avoidance in Andrej Babis’s Discourse on the Conflict-of-interest Case.”
European Politics and Society (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2043066. Burkart, P. 2014. Pirate Politics: The New Information Policy Contests. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitprcss/9205.001.0001. Bustikovâ, L., P. Babos. 2020. “Best in Covid: Populists in the Time of Pandemic.” Politics and Governance 8 (4): 496-508, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 7645/pag.v8i4.3424. Bustikovâ, L., P. Guasti. 2017. “The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe?” Politics and Governance 5 (4): 166-176, https://doi.Org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.l 156. Bustikovâ, L., P. Guasti. 2019. “The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (2): 302330, https://doi/org/10.1177/0888325418791723. Buzalka, J. 2021. “Village Fascists and Progressive Populists: Two Faces of the Countermovement in Slovakia.” Europe-Asia Studies 73 (9): 1658-1682, https:// doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1978934. Buzogâny, A., Ch. Mohamad-Klotzbach. 2021. “Populism and Nature—the Nature of Populism: New Perspectives on the Relationship between Populism, Climate Change, and Nature Protection.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 15: 155-164, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl2286-021-00492-7 . Buzogâny, A., Ch. Mohamad-Klotzbach. 2022. “Environmental Populism.” Pp. 321— 340 in Μ. Oswald (ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_19. Canovan, Μ. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47 (1): 2-16,
https://doi.0rg/lO.l 111/1467-9248.00184. Caramani, D. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 54-67,https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538.
96 Bibliography Casciano, D. 2021. “Popular Tales of Pastors, Luxury, Frauds and Corruption: Pentecostalism, Conspicuous Consumption, and the Moral Economy of Corruption in Nigeria.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): 52-71, https:// doi.org/10.5617/jea.9008. Cervinkovâ, Μ., L. Kulhavâ. 2013. “Karel Schwarzenberg a Milos Zeman: Pozitivni a negativni kampaft к prezidentskÿm volbâm [Karel Schwarzenberg and Milos Zeman: Positive and Negative Campaign before the Presidential Elections].” Nase spolecnost 11 (2): 16-29. Charrad, Μ. Μ., J. Adams. 2011. “Patrimonialism, Past and Present.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636: 6-15, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0002716211402286. Charvât, J. 2013. “Analÿza proccsu zavâdéni pfimé volby prezidenta v CR [Analysis of Adopting of Direct Presidential Election in Czechia].” Evropskd volebni studial European Electoral Studies 8 (2): 146-159. Charvât, J„ P. Just. 2017. Krize politickëho stranictvl a novi stranNti aktéri v ceské politice [Crisis of Political Partisanship and New Political Actors in Czech PoliticsJ. Prague: Μ UP Press. Chlup, R. 2020. “Competing Myths of Czech Identity.” New Perspectives 28 (2): 179204, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/2336825X20911817. Chryssogelos, A.-S. 2013. “The Evolution of the ‘Populist Potential’ in European Politics: From New Right Radicalism to Antisystem Populism.” European View 12 (1): 75-83, https://doi.org/10.1007/sl2290-013-0249-3. Chytilek, R. 2021. “Corrupt Elites, Pure People and Double Standards? Attitudes of Central European Populist and Mainstream Political Party
Sympathisers to Systemic and Individual Corruption.” Pp. 58-86 in J. Mendilow, É. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109676.00011. Cirhan, T., P. Kopecky. 2017. “Career Backgrounds, Professional Network and Party Cohesion: The Success of ANO in the Czech Republic.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 116-136, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-2-l 16. Cisaf, O. 2017. Czech Republic: From Post-Communist Idealism to Economic Populism. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Cisaf, О., V. Stëtka. 2017. “Czech Republic. The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream.” Pp. 285-298 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, С. H. Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Crossley, N. 2002. Making Sense of Social Movements. Buckingham: Open University Press. CVVM. 2013. “Stranické preference a volebni model v bfeznu 2013 [Party Support and Electoral Model in March 2013.” [online] CVVM [retrieved 3. 11. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/ al442/f9/pvl 30320.pdf CVVM. 2014. “Postoje к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2014 [Attitudes towards Political Parties - September 2014].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 5. 11. 2014]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/cl/a7280/13/ pvl41029.pdf. CVVM. 2016. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2016 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - September 2016].”
[online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/al582/f9/pvl 61107a.pdf.
Bibliography 97 CVVM. 2017. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - zâfi 2017 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - September 2017].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/a4441 /f9/pv 171030.pdf. CVVM. 2018. “Postoje obyvatel Ceské republiky к politickÿm stranâm - listopad 2018 [Attitudes of Czech Citizens towards Political Parties - November 2018].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_f orm2content/documents/c2/a4765/f9/pvl81212.pdf. CVVM. 2020a. “Mira naléhavosti rùznÿch oblasti vefejného zivota - bfezen 2020 [Degree of Urgency of Different Areas of Public Life].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/ documen ts/c2/a5191 Zf9/po200414.pdf. CVVM. 2020b. “Vliv na politické rozhodovâni -bfezen 2020[Influence on the Political Decision-Making - March 2020].” [online] CVVM [retrieved 22. 7. 2020]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2contcnt/documents/c2/a5205/f9/ pd2OO511.pdf. Dahlberg, S., Μ. Solcvid. 20016. “Docs Corruption Suppress Voter Turnout?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (4): 489-510, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17457289.2016.1223677. Dawson, J., S. Hanley. 2016. “What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”.” Journal of Democracy П (1): 20-34, https:// doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0015. De Cleen, B„ J. Glynos, A. Mondon. 2018. “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of
Engagement.” Organization 25 (5): 649-661, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/13505 08418768053. de Lange, S. L. 2012. “New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties.” Political Studies 60:899-918, https://doi.org/10.1111/ j. 1467-9248.2012.00947.x. Deegan-Krause, К., T. Haughton. 2018. “Surviving the Storm: Factors Determining Party Survival in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 32 (3): 473^492, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 177/0888325417728773. Demker, Μ. 2014. “Sailing along New Cleavages: Understanding the Electoral Success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament Election 2009.” Government and Opposition 49 (2): 188-206, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.24. Devadoss, S., J. Luckstead. 2015. “Can a Corrupt Ruling Party Win a Re-election through Vote Buying?” Applied Economics 8 (1): 18-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00036846.2015.1073839. Di Cocco, J., B. Monechi. 2022. “How Populist Are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning.” Political Analysis 30 (3): 311-327, https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.29. Dvofâkovâ, V. 2020. “О prostoru korupcnich prilezitosti. Kdy, kde a jak se vytvdri v feské republice /On Corruption Opportunity Space: When, Where, and How It Is Established in the Czech Republic].” Prague: SLON. Engler, S. 2016. “Corruption and Electoral Support for New Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 39 (2): 278-304, https.7/doi. org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1084127. Engler, S. 2020a. “Centrist Anti-establishment
Parties and Their Protest voters: More than a Superficial Romance?” European Political Science Review 12 (3): 307-325, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1017/S1755773920000132. Bayerisch J München I
98 Bibliography Engler, S. 2020b. ‘“Fighting Corruption’ or ‘Fighting the Corrupt Elite’? Politicizing Corruption within and beyond the Populist Divide.” Democratization 27 (4): 643661, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1713106. Erlingsson,G. 0., Μ. Persson. 2011. “The Swedish Pirate Party and the 2009 European Election: Protest or Issue Voting.” Politics 31 (3): 121-128, https://doi.org/10.llll/ j.1467-9256.2011.01411.x. Fieschi, C., P. Heywood. 2004. “Trust Cynicism and Populist Anti-Politics.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 289-309, https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263537. Fischer, F. 1989. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications. Foa, R. S. 2021. “Why Strongmen Win in Weak States.” Journal of Democracy 32 (1): 52-65, https://doi.org/10.13533/jod.2021.0000 . Frecden, Μ. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theories: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Frii, P. 1999. “Korupini klima v ÖR [Corruptin Climate in the Czech Republic].” Pp. 73-115 in P. Frii (ed.). Korupce na ceskÿ zpusob [Corruption in the Czech Way]. Prague: G plus G. Fric, R, J. Kabele. 1999. “Korupce jako sociâlni fenomén [Corruption as a Social Phenomenon].” Pp. 9-47 in P. Frii (ed.). Korupce na cesky zpusob [Corruption in the Czech Way], Prague: G plus G. Frii, P., O. Gyarfâsovâ. 2019. “The Rise of the Politics of Emotions: Anti-elitism and Anti-corruptism as Traits of Czech and Slovak Populist Parties.” Politické vedy!Political Sciences 22 (4): 221-246, https://doi.org/10.24040/politickev edy.2019.22.4.221246. Gerodimos, R., J. Justinussen. 2015.
“Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button.” Journal of Information Technology Politics 12 (2): 113-32, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266. Gidron, N., B. Bonikowski. 2013. Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda. Working Paper. Cambridge: Harvard University, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459387. Graziano, L. 2001. Lobbying, Pluralism and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Gregor, Μ., A. Mackovâ. 2015. “Euroscepticism the Czech way: An Analysis of Vaclav Klaus’ Speeches.” European Journal of Communication 30 (4): 404-417, https://doi. org/10.1177/0267323115582148 Grzymala-Busse, A. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511618819. Guasti, P. 2020. “Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020). ” Politics and Governance is (4): 473-484, https:// doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420. Gupta, A. 1995. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State.” American Ethnologist 22 (2): 375-402, https://doi. org/10.1525/ae. 1995.22.2.02a00090. Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hâjek, L. 2017. “Left, Right, Left, Right. Centre: Ideological Position of Andrej Babis’s ANO.” Politologickÿ casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 24 (3):
275301, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-3-275.
Bibliography 99 Hanley, S. 2004. “From Neo-Liberalism to National Interests: Ideology, Strategy, and Party Development in the Euroscepticism of the Czech Right.” East European Politics and Societies 18 (3): 513-547, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0888325404267392. Hanley, S. 2011. “Dynamika utvâïeni novÿch stran v Ceské republice v letech 19962010: hlcdàni moznÿch pfiCin politického zemêtfeseni [Dynamics of New Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996-2010: Looking for the Origins of a Political Earthquake].” Sociologicky casopis!Czech Sociological Review 47 (1): 115-136, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.13060/00380288.2011.47.1.06. Hanley, S. 2014. “Two Cheers for Czech Democracy.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 161-176, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2014-3-161. Hanley, S. 2018. “Legitimacy and the Paradox of Technocratic Government in Newer European Democracies: The Fischer Administration in the Czech Republic Revisited.” East European Polities and Societies 32 (1): 78-100, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0888325417734281. Hanley, S., A. Sikk. 2016. “Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 22 (4): 522-533, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/1354068814550438. Hanley, S., Μ. A. Vachudova. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276 -296, https:// doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457. Hanson, S. E. 2011. “Plebiscitarian Patrimonialism in Putin's Russia: Legitimating Authoritarianism in a
Postidcological Era.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636: 32-48, https://doi.org/10.! 177/00027 16211398210. Hardarson, 0. t»., E. H. Önnudottir. 2018. “Election Report: Iceland.” Scandinavian Political Studies 41 (2): 233-237, https://doi.org/10.! 111/1467-9477.12112. Hartleb, F. 2013. “Anti-elitist Cyber Parties." Journal of Public Affairs 13 (4): 355-369, https://doi.org/! 0.1002/pa. 1480. Haughton, T., K. Deegan-Krause. 2015. “Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 29 (1): 61-80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414566072. Havlik, V. 2019. “Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 369-384, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758 216.2019.1580590. Havlik, V., Μ. NèmCok, P. Spâ6, J. Zagrapan. 2020. “The 2020 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia. Steadily Turbulent Change of Direction.” Politologicky casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 27 (3): 221-234, https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2020-3-221. Havlik, V., P. Voda. 2016. “The Rise of New Political Parties and Re-Alignment of Party Politics in the Czech Republic.” Acta Politologica 8 (2): 119-144. Havlik, V., P. Voda. 2018. “Cleavages, Protest or Voting for Hope? The Rise of Centrist Populist Parties in the Czech Republic.” Swiss Political Science Review 24 (2): 161— 168, https://doi.org/10.ll 11/spsr. 12299. Havlik, V, V. Hlousek. 2014. “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: The Story of the Populist Public Affairs Party in the Czech Republic.” Perspectives on
European Politics and Society 15 (4): 552-570, https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2014.945254. Hawkins, K. A. 2009. “Is Châvez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040-1067, https:// doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.
100 Bibliography Hawkins, К. A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB0978051 1730245. Hawkins, К. A., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017a. “The Ideational Approach to Populism.” Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 513-528, https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.85 . Hawkins, К. A., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017b. “What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach Us, and What It Can’t.” 5iv/m Political Science Review 23 (4): 526-542, https://doi.org/10.! 111/spsr. 12281. Heidenheimer, A. 1989. “Perceptions on the Perception of Corruption.” Pp. 149-164 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Heywood, P. Μ. 2017. “Rethinking Corruption: Hocus-Pocus, Locus and Focus.” The Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 21-48, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveaste urorev2.95.1.0021. Hilmar, T. 2022. “Restoring Economic Pride? How Right-Wing Populists Moralize Economic Change.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2056729. Hlousck, V. 2012. “Vèci vefejné: politické podnikâni strany typu firmy [The Public Affairs Party: The Political Enterprise of a Business Firm Party].” Politologickÿ casopisICzech Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 322-340, https://doi.org/10.5817/ PC2012-4-322. Hlousek, V., L. KopeCek, P. Vodovâ. 2020. The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-41916-5. Holmes, L. 1993.
The End of Communist Power Anti-corruption Campaigns and Legitimization Crisis. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. Holmes, L. 2003. “Political Corruption in Central and Eastern Europe.” Pp. 193206 in Μ. J. Bull, J. L. Newell (eds.). Corruption in Contemporary Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919991_15. Holmes, L. 2015. Corruption: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199689699.001.0001 . Hopkin, J., C. Paolucci. 1999. “The Business Firm Party Model of Party Organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 285-305, https://doi.org/10.llll/1475-6765.00451 . Huber, R. A. 2020. “The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection.” Environmental Politics 29 (6): 959-982, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186. Huber, R. A., E. Greussing, J.-M. Eberl. 2021. “From Populism to Climate Scepticism: The Role of Institutional Trust and Attitudes towards Science.” Environmental Politics (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200. Hunger, S., F. Paxton. 2022. “What’s in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science.” Political Science Research and Methods 10 (3): 617-633, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44 . Ibenskas, R., A. Sikk. 2017. “Patterns of Party Change in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2015.” Party Politics 23 (1): 43-54, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540 68816655571. Ivarsflaten, E. 2008. “What Unites Right-
Wing Populists in Western Europe? ReExamining Grievance Mobilization Models in Seven Successful Cases. ” Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 3-23, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168.
Bibliography 101 Jääsaari, J., D. Sârovec. 2021. “Pirate Parties: The Original Digital Party Family.” Pp. 205-226 in O. Barberà, G. Sandri, P. Correa, J. Rodriguez-Teruel (eds.). Digital Parties. The Challenges of Online Organisation and Participation. Springer, https:// doi.org/10.1OO7/978-3-O3O-78668-7J1. Jagers, J., S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319-45, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j.1475-6765. 2006.00690.x. Johnston, Μ. 2001. “The Definitions Debate: Old Conflicts in New Guises.” Pp. 11-31 in A. K. Jain (cd.). The Political Economy of Corruption. Routledge, https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203468388.ch2. Johnston. Μ. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption. Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB0978051 1490965. Jowitt, K. 1983. “Soviet Neotraditionalism: The Political Corruption of a Leninist Regime.” Soviet Studies 35 (3): 275-297, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813830 8411481. Just, R, J. Charvât. 2016. “Business-Firm Parties and the Czech Party System after 2010.” Politics in Central Europe 12 (3), https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0018. Kajsiu, B. 2020. ^Corrupcion piiblica 0 privada? La dimension ideolögica de los discursos anti-corrupciôn en Colombia, Ecuador y Albania. Bogota: Tirant lo Blanch. Kajsiu, В. 2021. “Public or Private Corruption? The Ideological Dimensions of Anti corruption Discourses in Colombia, Ecuador and Albania.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): 27-51,
https://doi.org/10.5617/jca.9243. Karklins, R. 2005. The System Made Me Do It. Corruption In Post-Communist Societies. Armonk and London: Μ. E. Sharpe. Kcfford, G., B. Moffitt, A. Werner. 2022. “Populist Attitudes: Bringing Together Ideational and Communicative Approaches.” Political Studies 70 (4): 1006-1027, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321721997741 Keller, J. 2013. “Kupte si svûj ùfad! [Buy Your Own Office!].” Salon, 1 August 2013:3,5. Kim, S. 2022. Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrdd Four. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186007. Kiss, T., I. G. Székely. 2022. “Populism on the Semi-periphery: Some Considerations for Understanding the Anti-corruption Discourse in Romania.” Problems of Post Communism 69 (6): 514-527, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1869907. Klaveren, J. van. 1989. “Corruption as a Historical Phenomenon.” Pp. 73-86 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Klima, Μ. 2015. Od totality к defektnidemokracii. Privatizace a kolonizacepolitickych stran netransparentnlm byznysem [From Totalitarianism to Defective Democracy: The Privatization and Colonization of Political Parties by Non-transparent Business]. Prague: SLON. Kmenta, J. 2017. Boss Babis. Nymburk: JKM. Knight, A. 1998. “Populism and Neo-populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 30 (2): 223-248, https://doi.org/10.1017/S00222 16X98005033. Kopecek, L. 2013. “Opoziéni smlouvy “za kopeCky” IL: Byl pakt CSSD a ODS z let 1998-2002 demokratickou
deviaci? [Opposition Agreements Outside the Czech Republic IL: Was the Social Democratic Party and Civic Democratic Party Pact
102 Bibliography from 1998 to 2002 a Democratic Deviation? (Part Two)].” Stredoevropsképolitické Studie/Central European Political Studies Review 15 (4): 284-299, https://doi.org/ 10.5817/CEPSR.2013.4.284. KopeCek, L. 2015. Deformace demokracie? Opozicni smlouva a ceskä politika 19982002 /Deformation of Democracy? Opposition Agreement and Czech Politics 19982002]. Brno: Barrister Principal. Kopeiek, L. 2016. “‘I’m Paying, So I Decide’: Czech ANO as an Extreme Form of a Business-Firm Party.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (4): 725-749, https:// doi.org/10.1177/0888325416650254. Kopeiek, L. 2017. Milos Zeman. Pribêh talentovanëho pragmatika [Milos Zeman. The Talented Pragmatic's Story]. Brno: Barrister Principal. Kopeckÿ, P., Μ. Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897-921, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01402382.2011.591072. Kossow, N. 2019. “Populism and Corruption (Transparency International Anti corruption Helpdesk Answer).” [online] Transparency International [retrieved 8. 8. 2022]. Available at: https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdcsk/popul ism-and-corruption. Kostadinova, T. 2012. Political Corruption in Eastern Europe: Politics After Communism. London: Lynne Rienner Puslishers, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626374157. Krastev, I. 2004. Shifting Obsessions: Three Essays on the Politics of Anticorruption. Budapest: CEU Press. Krôâl, P., V. Naxera. 2018. “Populistickâ konstrukcc nâroda ohrozeného migraci: CAQDAS volebniho diskurzu öeskych parlamentnich voleb v race 2017
[Populistic Construction of Nation Threatened by Migration: CAQDAS of Election Discourse within 2017 Czech Parliamentary Elections].” Sociolôgia 50 (5): 491-523, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2018.50.5.19. Kriesi, H. 2012. “The Political Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest.” Swiss Political Science Review 18 (4): 518-522, https://doi.Org/10.l 111/spsr. 12006. Khzkovsky, Μ. 2019. “Tizivé dëdictvi nové politiky v Cesku: Zeleni jako pfipad neùspëSného morâlniho populismu [The Burdensome Legacy of New Politics in Czechia: The Greens as a Case of Failed Moral Populism].” Central European Journal of Politics 5(1): 30-54. Krouwel, A. 2006. “Party Models.” Pp. 249-269 in R. S. Katz, W. Crotty (eds.). Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608 047.n22. Kubânek, Μ. 2016. “Role populismu ve volebnim marketingu hnuti ANO pfed parlamentnimi volbami v roce 2013 [The Role of Populism in the Electoral Marketing of the Movement ANO Before the Czech Parliamentary Election in 2013]. ” Stredoevropsképolitické studielCentral European Political Studies Review 18 (4): 319-353, https://doi.Org/10.5817/CEPSR.2016.4.319. Kubât, Μ., Μ. Brunclik. 2018. Semi-presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Presidents: Presidential Politics in Central Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, https:// doi.org/10.4324/9781315166452. Kubbe, I., Μ. Loli. 2020. “Corruption and Populism: The Linkage.” Pp. 107-117 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00016.
Bibliography 103 Kupka, P., Μ. Mocht’ak. 2015. “The Nagygate Affair, Corruption and Organized Crime: Corruption Networks and Their Potential Impact on the Quality of Democracy in the Czech Republic.” World Political Science 11 (1): 157-185, https:// doi.org/10.1515/wps-2015-0004. Kupka, P., V. Naxera. 2023. “Looking Back on Corruption: Representations of Corruption and Anti-corruption Measures in Czech Party Manifestos between 1990-2017.” SocidlnistudialSocial Studies (in print). Kupka, P., V. Walach, K. Tvrdâ. 2021. “Profit, or Power? Towards a Construction of Organized Crime in Czech Policy.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 66: 1-10, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100489. Kupka, P., V. Walach, V. DiviJova. 2022. “From Legal Definitions to Ethnic Identities: Representations of Organized Crime in Czech Policy Documents.” Trends in Organized Crime (on-line first), https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1007/s 12117-022-09449-y. Laclau, E. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso. Laclau, E. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” Pp. 32-50 in F. Panizza (ed.). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso. Laclau, E., Ch. Mouffe. 1984. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso. Lambropoulou, E. 2012. “Corruption Discourse as a Wild Card: Politics and Media in Greece and the “Modern” Triumphalism of Anti-Corruption.” In D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos (eds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge. Lampert, N. 1985. Whistle-blowing in the Soviet Union: Complaints and Abuses Under State Socialism.
London: Palgrave Macmillan. Larsson, A. O. 2016. “Online, All the Time? A Quantitative Assessment of the Permanent Campaign on Facebook.” New Media Society 18 (2): 274-292, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538798. Ledeneva, A. 2009. “Corruption in Postcommunist Societies: A Re-examination.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10 (1): 69-86, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15705850802700017. Ledeneva, A., R. Bratu, P. Köker. 2017. “Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches.” Slavonic and East European Review 95 (1): 1-20, https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.L0001. Linek, L. 2010. Kam se ztratili volici? Vysvëtleni vÿvoje volebni ucasti v Ceske republice V letech 1990-2010 [Where Did the Voters Go? Explanation of the Development of Voter Turnout in the Czech Republic in the Years 1990-2010]. Brno: CDK. Lubbers, Μ., Μ. Gijsberts, P. Scheepers. 2002. “Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345-378, https:// doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00015. Lucardie, P. 2000. “Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors: Towards a Theory on the Emergence of New Parties.” Party Politics 6 (2): 175-185, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1354068800006002003. Mair, P., C. Mudde. 1998. “The Party Family and Its Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 211-229, https://doi.Org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.l.l.211. Manucci, L., E. Weber. 2017. “Why the Big Picture Matters: Political and Media Populism in Western Europe Since the 1970s.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 313-334,
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr. 12267. Mares, L, L. Young. 2020. “Buying, Expropriating and Stealing Votes.” Pp. 55-74 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of
104 Bibliography Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178 9905007.00012. Markovska, A., A. Serdyuk. 2014. “Analysing Media Representation of Corruption in Ukraine: Who Is Panicking?” Pp. 121-138 in P. C. van Duyne, J. Harvey, G. A. Antonopoulos, K. von Lampe, A. Maljevié, A. Markovska (eds.). Corruption, Greed and Crime-Money: Sleaze and Shady Economy in Europe and Beyond. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers. Marquette, H. 2003. Corruption, Politics and Development: The Role of the World Bank. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Maskarinec, P. 2013. “Prostorovâ analÿza prczidentskÿch voleb v Ceské republice v roce 2013 [Spatial Analysis of the 2013 Czech Presidential Elections].” Sociolôgia 45 (5): 435-469. MaSkarinec, P. 2017. “The Czech Pirate Party in the 2010 and 2013 Parliamentary Elections and the 2014 European Parliament Elections: Spatial Analysis of Voter Support.” Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 17 (1): 5-33, https://doi.org/10.1515/ sjps-2017-0001. Maskarinec, P. 2019. “The Rise of New Populist Political Parties in Czech Parliamentary Elections Between 2010 and 2017: The Geography of Party Replacement.” Eurasian Geography and Economics BQ (5): 511-547, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928. Maskarinec, P. 2020. “Crossing the Left-Right Party Divide? Understanding the Electoral Success of the Czech Pirate Party in the 2017 Parliamentary elections.” Politics 40 (4): 510-526, https://doi.Org/10.l 177/0263395720920768. Maskarinec, R, P. Blaha. 2014. “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Grievance Theory and the Rise of New Political
Parties in the 2010 and 2013 Czech Parliamentary Elections.” Sociolôgia 46 (6): 706-731. Maskarinec, R, V. Naxera. 2022. “The Pirates of Czechia: The Curse of Preferential Vote.” Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 22 (1): 5-24, https://doi.org/10.34135/ sjps.220101. Matthes, C.-Y. 2016. “Comparative Assessments of the State of Democracy in EastCentral Europe and Its Anchoring in Society.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (5-6): 323-334, https://doi.rog/10.1080/10758216.2016.1201771. Median. 2019. “Volebni model -srpen 2019 azprosinec 2019 [Electoral Model August 2019 to December 2019].” [online] Median [retrieved 18-06-22]. Available at: http:// showme.median.ez/snemovni-volby/#/model. Meijers, Μ. J., A. Zaslove. 2021. “Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 372-147, https://doi. org/10.1177/0010414020938081. Mendilow, J. 2021. “Introduction to Populism and Corruption.” Pp. 1-35 in J. Mendilow, E. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109 676.00008. Mendilow, J., E. Phélippeau (eds.). 2021. Populism and Corruption. The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978183 9109676. Mincigrucci, R., A. Stanziano. 2018. “How Corruption Coverage Harms Italy’s Society.” [online] European Journalism Observatory [retrieved 8. 8. 2022]. Available at: https://en.ejo.ch/research/the-journalistic-coverage-of-corruption-in-italy-anexample-of-penal-populism.
Bibliography 105 Moffitt, В. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9780804799331. Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541-563, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j. 1477-7053.2004.00135.x. Mudde, C. 2007. The Populist Radical Right in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511492037 . Mudde, C. 2017. SYRIZA. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-47479-3. Mudde, C. 2021. “Populism in Europe: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism (The Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2019).” Government and Opposition 56: 577-597, https://doi.org/10.1017/ gov.2021.15 Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2012. “Populism and (Liberal) Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” Pp. 1-26 in C. Mudde, C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds.). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective to Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139152365.002. Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48 (2): 1-28, https://doi.Org/l0.1017/gov.2012.l 1. Mudde, С., C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234 874.001.000. Mudde, C„ C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and
Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667-1693, https://doi.org/10.1177/00104 14018789490. Müller, К. В. 2012. “KmotFi, dârky a modern! byrokracie: diiCi shrnuti a dvë kritické poznâmky к sociâlnim studiim lobbing [Godfathers, Gifts, and Modern Bureaucracy: Partial Summary and Two Critical Remarks on the Social Studies of Lobbing].” A eta Fakultyfilozofické Zâpadoceské univerzity v Plzni / West Bohemian review of Social Sciences Humanities 4 (3): 81-101. Muller, К. В. 2016. “К Сети instituée? Jsme pfeci sami slusni lidé! PFi'iiny, dùsledky a Feseni nedûvëry v zastupitelské sbory v Cesku [Why Institutions? We Are Indeed АП Decent People! Causes, Consequences and Solutions of Distrust in Representative Bodies in the Czech Republic].” Politologickà RevuetCzech Political Science Review 22(1): 5-39. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., Μ. Fazekas. 2020. “How to Define and Measure Corruption.” Pp. 7-26 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/ 10.4337/9781789905007.00008. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., P. Μ. Heywood. 2020. “Making Sense of Corruption Studies: An Introduction.” Pp. 2-6 in A. Mungiu-Pippidi, P. Μ. Heywood (eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https:// doi.org/10.4337/9781789905007.00007. Naxera, V. 2013. “Patterns of Corruption, Clientelism, and Party Patronage in Communist and Post-Communist Societies in Central Europe.” Politics in Central Europe 9 (1): 47-68.
106 Bibliography Naxera, V. 2015a. “Corruption Perception in the Czech Republic.” Politics in Central Europe 11 (1): 51-73, https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2015-0001 Naxera, V. 2015b. Korupce v komunistickém rezimu a v prûbëhu postkomunistické transformace. Studie korupcnich, klientelistickych a patronâznich jevü z prostfedi CeskoslovenskalCeské republiky [Corruption in the Communist Regime and During the Post-Communist Transformation. The Study of Corrupt, Clientelistic, and Patronage Phenomena from the Environment of Czechoslovakia!Czech Republic], Brno: Doplnëk. Naxera, V. 2015c. “Vefejné nebo soukromé? Pfispëvek do debaty о charakteru korupinich a klientelistickych jevù [Public or Private? The Contribution to the Discussion on the Nature of Corrupt and Clientelistic Phenomena].” StredICentre 7(1): 117-128 Naxera, V. 2015d. “Zobrazovâni korupce v programatice Ceskÿch politickÿch stran V prûbëhu postkomunistického vÿvoje [Perception of Corruption in the Electoral Programs of the Czech Political Parties during the Post-Communist Development].” Politické vedylPolitical Sciences 18 (1): 57-85. Naxera, V. 2017. “Democracy, Corruption and (in)security: A Theoretical Interpretation and Several Observations from the Czech Environment.” Pp. 78-88 in Security Forum 2017. Conference Proceedings. Banskâ Bystrica: Interpolis. Naxera, V. 2018. “The Never-Ending Story: Czech Governments, Corruption and Populist Anti-Corruption Rhetoric (2010-2018).” Politics in Central Europe 14 (3): 31-54, https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0017 . Naxera, V. 2019. ‘“Islamophobia without Muslims’: Anti-
Muslim and Anti-Arab Attitudes in Czech Society (Introductory Remarks).” Pp. 251-267 in S. Gardocki, R. Ozarowski, R. Ulatowski (eds.). The Islamic World in International Relations. Berlin: Peter Lang. Naxera, V. 2021a. “Corruption in the Czech Republic: An Overview.” Pp. 28^49 in T. A. Barabâs (ed.). Distinguishing Criteria between Petty and High-Ranking Corruption: Countries' Case Studies . Budapest: National Institute of Criminology. Naxera, V. 2021b. ‘“Let us blow them down!’: Corruption as the subject of (non-) populist communication of the Czech Pirate Party.” Politics (on-line first), https:// doi.org/10.1177/02633957211010984. Naxera, V. 2021c. Od kritiky postsocialistické privatizace po nästup protikorupcnich hnuti. Téma korupce v komunikaci aktérü polistopadové ceské politiky [From the Criticism of Post-Socialist Privatisation to the Arrival of Anti-Corruption Movements. The Topic of Corruption within the Communication of Post-Revolution Czech Politicians]. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia Press. Naxera, V. 2022a. “A Few Populist Statements Don’t Make a Populist? The Issue of Corruption in (non-)populist Communication of Czech President Milos Zeman.” Pp. 53-66 in S. Kukovië, P. Just (eds.). The Rise of Populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Naxera, V. 2022b. “Smërem к principùm populistické komunikace? Téma korupce ve volebnich programech ëeskÿch politickÿch stran [Towards the Principles of Populist Communication? The Topic of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties].” Sociologicky casopis!Czech
Sociological Review 58 (2): 181-204, https://doi. org/10.13060/csr.2022.015. Naxera, V. 2022c. “The Germans as a Threat to ‘Us’? The Use of History and Othering of Germans in the Speeches of the Czech President Milos Zeman.” Pp. 135-156 in C. Schapkow, F. Jacob (eds.). Nationalism and Populism: Expressions of Fear
Bibliography 107 or Political Strategies? Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110729740-007. Naxera, V., О. Stulik. 2022. “‘I Will Handle It Personally’: The Neo-patrimonial Rhetoric of the Czech Prime Minister in the Times of COVID-19.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (3): 474-486, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782 804.2021.1911789. Naxera, V., P. KrCâl. 2018. “‘This is a Controlled Invasion’: The Czech President Milos Zeman’s Populist Perception of Islam and Immigration as Security Threats.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory Language Politics 12 (2): 192-215, https://doi. org/10.2478/jnmlp-2018-0008. Naxera, V., P. Krtâl. 2019. ‘“You Can’t Corrupt Eight Million Voters’: Corruption as a Topic in Milos Zeman’s Populist Strategy.” Studies of Transition States and Societies} 1 (1):3-18. Naxera, V, P. Kröäl. 2020. "'Ostrovy deviacc’ v populistické rétorice Milose Zemana (“The Isles of Deviation” in Populist Rhetorics of Milos Zeman].” Sociolôgia 52 (1): 82-99, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.l.4. Naxera, V, V. Glied, O. Filipec, Μ. Kaczorowska. 2020. “‘To Protect National Sovereignty from the ELI?’ The 2019 EP Elections and Populist Parties in V4 Countries.” Revista UNISC154-. 71-106, https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-98. Nordensvard, Μ., J. Kctola. 2022. “Populism as an Act of Storytelling: Analyzing the Climate Change Narratives of Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg as Populist Truth-tellers.” Environmental Politics 31 (5): 861-882, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09644016.2021.1996818. Norris, R, G. Evans. 1999. “Introduction: Understanding
Electoral Change.” Pp. xixxl in G. Evans, P. Norris (eds.). Critical Elections: British Partiesand Voters in LongTerm Perspective. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218518.nl5 . Novotny, L., D. Sarovec. 2021. “Contemporary Pirate Parties in the Post-Material Era: Comparing Success Cases.” Studia Politico. Romanian Political Science Review 21 (1): 29-51. Nye, J. S. 1989. “Corruption and Political Development. A Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Pp. 963-984 in A. J. Heidenheimer, Μ. Jonston, V. T. LeVine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers. Obydenkova, A., B. Arpino. 2018. “Corruption and Trust in the European Union and National Institutions: Changes over the Great Recession across European States.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (3): 594-611, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms. 12646. Orr, G. 2006. “Suppressing Vote-Buying: the ‘War’ on Electoral Bribery from 1868.” The Journal of Legal History 27 (3): 289-314, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144036060 1041142. 0stbo Kuldova, T, T. Rayem, J. 0stbo. 2021. “Editorial. Corruption and the Moral Economy of Fraud.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5 (2): i-iv, https://doi.org/ 10.5617/jea.9625. Otjes, S. 2020. “All on the Same Boat? Voting for Pirate Parties in Comparative Perspective.” Politics 40 (I): 38-53, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0263395719833274. Pauwels, T. 2011. “Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (1): 97119, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1080/17457289.2011.539483. Pavlova, E. 2020. “Corrupt
Governance: Self-defeating Anti-corruption Rhetoric and Initiatives in Russia.” New Perspectives 28 (2): 205-222, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2336825X20911513.
108 Bibliography Philp, Μ. 2006. “Corruption Definition and Measurement.” Pp. 45-79 in Ch. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, F. Galtung (eds.). Measuring Corruption. Routledge. Pierce, S. 2006. “Looking Like a State: Colonialism and the Discourse of Corruption in Northern Nigeria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 48 (4): 887-914, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417506000338. Pink, Μ., A. Folvariny. 2020. “The Czech Pirate Party: A New Alternative, Not Only for the Young.” Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 6 (4): 176-196, https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v6i4.610. Plattner, Μ. F. 2010. “Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 81-92, https://doi.Org/10.1353/jod.0.0154. Polk, J. et al. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research Politics 4 (1): 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1177/205316801 6686915. Pop-Eleches, G. 2010. “Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism.” World Politics 62 (2): 221-260, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0043887110000043. Popping, R. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse Using Semantic Text Analysis: A Comment.” Quality Quantity 52:2163-2172, https://doi.org/10.1007/ si 1135-017-0651-z. Powell, E. N., J. A. Tucker. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123-147, https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341200 0531. Pujas, V, Μ. Rhodes.
1999. “Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain and France.” West European Politics 22 (3): 41-63, https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238990 8425315. Pytlas, B. 2022. ‘“Fix the System!’ Variations of Anti-establishment Normalisation Strategies in Comparative Perspective.” Politics (on-line first), https://doi.org/ 10.1177/02633957221089219. Reed, Q. 1999a. “Korupce v privatizaci öeskou cestou [Corruption in the Privatization in the Czech Way].”Pp. 159-204 in P. Fri6(ed.). Korupce naceskÿzpùsob [Corruption in the Czech Way]. Prague: G plus G. Reed, Q. 1999b. “Politicka korupce v postkomunistické spoleünosti [Political Corruption in the Post-communist Society].” Pp. 116-158 in P. Friö (ed.). Korupce na ceskÿ zpùsob [Corruption in the Czech Way], Prague: G plus G. Reinemann, C., T. Aalberg, F. Esser, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese. 2017. “Populist Political Communication: Toward a Model of Its Causes, Forms, and Effects.” Pp. 12-25 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Roberts, A. 2019. “Czech Billionaires as Politicians.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 434-444, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1490652 . Robinson, N. 2013. “Economic and Political Hybridity: Patrimonial Capitalism in the post-Soviet Sphere.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 4 (2): 136-145, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euras.2013.03.003. Rooduijn, Μ. 2018. “What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties.” European Political Science Review 10 (3): 351368,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.
Bibliography 109 Rooduijn, Μ. 2019. “State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (1): 362-372, https://doi.Org/10.l 111/1475-6765.12314. Rooduijn, Μ., S. L. de Lange, W. van der Brug. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics 20 (4): 563-575, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1177/1354068811436065. Rooduijn, Μ., T. Pauwels. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1272-1283, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01402382.2011.616665. Rossc-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB097 81139175098. Rusciano, F. L. 2021. “Populism and the Corruption Pluralist Governance Structures.” Pp. 37-56 in J. Mcndilow, E. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption: The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/ 9781839109676.00010. Sajô, A. 2003. “From Corruption to Extortion: Conteptualization of Post-communist Corruption.” Crime, Law and Social Change 40 (2-3): 171-194, https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1025736621543. Sampson, S. 2010. “The Anti-corruption Industry: From Movement to Institution.” Global Crime 11 (2): 261-278, https://d0i.0rg/l0.1080/17440571003669258 . Sampson, S. 2011. “Integrity Warriors: Global Morality and the Anti-corruption Movement in the Balkans.” Pp. 314-349 in Μ. Johnston (ed.). Public Sector Corruption, Vol. I. London: SAGE
Publications Inc. Sandholtz, W, R. Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture, and Communism.” International Review of Sociology 15 (1): 109-131, https://doi.org/10.1080/039067 00500038678. Sârovcc, D. 2018. “Nâstup novÿch politickÿch stran v ÖR od roku 2013: hnuti ANO 2011 a Ùsvit ph'mé demokracie pohledem konceptu novosti [The Emergence of New Political Parties in the Czech Republic: ANO 2011 and Dawn of Direct Democracy through the Concept of Newness].” Sociolôgia 50 (1): 78-113. Sârovec, D. 2019a. “Assured Newcomers on a Squally Sea? The Czech Pirate Party before and after the 2017 Elections.” Acta Fakulty filozofické Zâpadoceské Univerzity v PlznilWest Bohemian Review of Social Sciences ά Humanities 11 (2): 121, https://doi.Org/10.24132/actaff.2019.l 1.2.1. Särovec, D. 2019b. “Is the ‘New’ always ‘New’? Theoretical Framework Problems of New Political Parties’ Research: The Czech Republic Experience.” Politics in Central Europe 15 (1): 55-80, https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0003. Schedler, A. 1996. “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties.” Party Politics 2 (3): 291-312, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1080/00344893.2019.1643770. Schumacher, G., K. van Kersbergen. 2016. “Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?” Party Politics 22 (3): 300-312, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345. Schwörer, J. 2021. The Growth of Populism in the Political Mainstream: The Contagion Effects of Populist Messages on Mainstream Parties' Communication. Cham: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72449-8. Schwörer, J. 2022. “Less Populist in Power? Online
Communication of Populist Parties in Coalition Governments.” Government Opposition 57 (3): 467-489, https://doi. org/10.1017/gov.2021.2.
110 Bibliography Scott, J. C. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall, Inc. Shafir, Μ. 2021. “Corruption and Populism in East-Central Post-communist Europe: the Egg, the Hen and the Omelet.” Pp. 153-189 in J. Mendilow, É. Phélippeau (eds.). Populism and Corruption: The Other Side of the Coin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109676.00016 . Sicakova-Beblava, E., Μ. Beblavy. 2016. “Using Government Manifestos to Analyse the Political Salience and Shape of Anti-corruption Policies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Policy Studies 37 (4): 295-313, https://doi.org/10.1080/01442 872.2016.1146247. Sikk, A. 2012. “Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties.” Party Politics 18 (4): 465-486, https://doi.org/10J 177/1354068810389631. Skolnik, Μ. 2020a. “Corruption and Political Participation: A Review.” Sociitlni studialSocialStudies 17 (1): 89-104, https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2020-l-89. Skolnik, Μ. 2020b. “Korupce a dûvéra vc vefcjnou sprâvu v postkomunistické Evropê [Corruption and Trust in Public Administration in Post-communist Europe].” Acta Politologica 12(1): 20-39, https://doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/25_2019. Skolnik, Μ. 2021. “Korupce v Ceské republice-dosavadni stav bâdâni [Corruption in the Czech Republic - the State of the Discipline].” Acta Politologica 13 (2): 22-38, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.14712/1803-8220/31 _2020. Skolnik, Μ., Μ. Haman, J. Copik. 2022. “Do Free Food and Beverages Bring People to the Political Meeting? The Survey Experiment of Attendance-Buying.” Political Studies Review 20 (4):
691-701, https://doi.0rg/lO.l 177/14789299211047333. Skvarenina, О., V. Havlik, V. Dostâlovâ. 2021. “Migration, Corruption, and Ideological Centrism: Explanations of Anti-Establishment Attitudes in the Czech Republic.” Sociolögia 53 (3): 287-308, https://doi.Org/10.31577/sociologia.2021.53.3.l 1. SlaCâlek, О. 2021. “Czech Republic: Populism without Culture Wars?” Pp. 158-202 in P. Barsa, Z. Hesovâ, O. SlaCâlek (eds.). Central European Culture Wars: Beyond Post-Communism and Populism. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts. Slomczynski, K., G. Shabad. 2012. “Perceptions of Political Party Corruption and Voting Behaviour in Poland.” Party Politics 18 (6): 897-917, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1354068810393266. Smilov, D., R. Dorsiev. 2012. “Corruption in Bulgaria: Contested Perceptions, Shared Disappointment.” Pp. 237-260 in D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannaopulos (eds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge Stanley, J. 2018. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Random House. Stanyer, J., S. Salgado, J. Strömbäck. 2017. “Populist Actors as Communicators or Political Actors as Populist Communicators: Cross-national Findings and Perspectives.” Pp. 353-364 in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. De Vreese (eds.). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. Stavrakakis, Y. 2004. “Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253-267, https://doi.org/10.1080/135693I042000263519. Stojarovâ, V. 2018.
“Populist, Radical and Extremist Political Parties in Visegrad Countries vis à vis the Migration Crisis. In the Name of the People and the Nation in Central Europe.” Open Political Science 1 (1): 32-45, https://doi.org/10.1515/ope nps-2018-0001.
Bibliography 111 Stone, J. R. Jr. 2022. Populism, Eco-populism, and the Future of Environmentalism. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003264224 . StrapäCova, Μ., V. Hlousek. 2018. “Anti-Islamism without Moslems: Cognitive Frames of Czech Antimigrant Politics.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory Language Polities 12(1): 1-30. Stritzel, H. 2014. Security in Translation. Securitization Theory and the Localization of Threat. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307576_4. Stulik, O. 2016. “Diskurzivni analyza Nârodnich listû: nârod vs. islam a Laclauuv populistickÿ matrix [A Discursive Analysis of Narodni listy: Nation vs. Islam and the Laclau Matrix].” Stfedoevropské politick!’ Studie!Central European Political Studies Review 17 (2-3): 223-252, https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2015.23.223. Stulik, O. 2019. “Do We Have all the Necessary Data? The Challenge of Measuring Populism through Metaphors.” Quality Quantity 53: 2653-2670, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/sl 1135-019-00878-6. Stulik, O. 2022. “Recognising and Applying Equivalent Meanings: An Example of Creating a Codebook from a Language-Game of Extremism in the Czech Republic.” Quality Quantity (on-line first), https://doi.org/10.1007/sl 113 5-022-01418-5. Stulik, O., J. Paleick. 2021. “‘Recall’ as an Empty Signifier - The Problem of SPD Party Populism.” Stadia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review 21 (2): 521-540. Stulik, O., P. Krial. 2019. “Surfovani na migraini νΐηύ v dob£ populismu: Sekuritizacc migrace ze strany poslancù Parlamcntu Ccské rcpubliky [Surfing on the Migration Wave in the Age
of Populism: Securitization of Migration by Deputies of Czech Parliamentary].” Acta Politologica 11 (1): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.14712/18038220/8_2019. Stulik, О., V. Naxera. 2022. “One Flew Over the Stork’s Nest’: Neo-patrimonial Populism of Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis.” Journal of Comparative Politics 15 (2): 39-55. Taggart, P. A. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press. Tänzler, D.,K. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos. 2012. “The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe: An Introduction.” In D. Tänzler, К. Maras, A. Giannakopoulos (cds.). The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. London: Routledge. Timmer, A. D., D. Docka-Filipek. 2018. “Enemies of the Nation: Understanding the Hungarian State’s Relationship to Humanitarian NGOs.” Journal of International Global Studies 9 (2): 40-57. Tumber, H., S. R. Waisbord (eds.). 2004. Political Scandals and Media Across Democracies, Volumes I II. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Udeh, P. 2004. “Centrist Populism as a New Competitive and Mobilization Strategy in Slovak Politics.” Pp. 45-73 in O. Gyarfâsovâ, G. Meseznikov (eds.). Party Government in Slovakia: Experience and Perspectives. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs. UCeft, P. 2007. “Parties, Populism, and Anti-establishment Politics in East Central Europe.” SAIS Review 27 (1): 49-62, https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2007.0021 . Urbinati, N. 2017. “Antiestablishment and the Substitution of the Whole with One of Its Parts.” Pp. 77-97 in C. de la Torre (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London: Routledge,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-7. Uslaner, E. Μ. 2004. “Trust and Corruption.” Pp. 90-106 in J. H. Lambsdorff, Μ. Taube, Μ. Schramm. The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Abingdon: Routledge.
112 Bibliography Uslaner, E. M. 2008. Corruption. Inequality, and the Rule ofLaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511510410. Vachudova, Μ. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318-340, https://doi.org/10.1080/21599 165.2020.1787163. Vodovâ, P., P. Voda. 2020. “The Effects of Deliberation in Czech Pirate Party: The Case of Coalition Formation in Brno (2018).” European Political Science 19 (2): 181-189, https://doi.org/I0.1057/s41304-019-00233-l . Walter, J. 1988. “Law as an Instrument of Economic Regulation: Economic Crime in Czechoslovakia 1947-1987.” Review of Socialist Law 3 (14): 209-239, https://doi. org/10.1163/187529888X00130. Walters, W. 2008. “Anti-policy and Anti-politics: Critical Reflections on Certain Schemes to Govern Bad Things.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 1 1 (3): 267— 288, https://doi.org/10.! 177/1367549408091844. Weber, Μ. 1998. “Politika jako povolâni [Politics as a Vocation].” Pp. 246-196 in Μ. Weber, Μ. Havelka. Metodologie, sociologie, politika [Methodology, Sociology, Politics!. Prague: ΟΙΚΟΥΜΕΝΗ. Weber, Μ. 2006. “Bureaucracy.” Pp. 49-70 in A. Sharma, A. Gupta (eds.). The Anthropology of the State. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Wedel, J. R. 2001. “‘State’ and ‘Private’: Up against the Organizational Realities of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Trends in Organized Crime 7 ( 1 ): 6-46, https://doi.org/!0.1007/s 12117-001-1013-7. Wedel, J. R. 2012. “Rethinking Corruption in an Age of Ambiguity.” Annual Review of Law and
Social Science 8: 453-498, https://doi.Org/10.l 146/annurcv.lawsocsci.093 008.131558. White, D. 2018. “State Capacity and Regime Resilience in Putin’s Russia.” International Political Science Review 39 (1): 130-143, https://doi.org/10.! 177/0192512117694481. Windt, TO. Jr. 1986. “Presidential Rhetoric: Definition of a Field of Study.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 16(1): 330-348. Wintr, J., Μ. Antos, J. Kysela. 2016. “Direct Election of the President and Its Constitutional and Political Consequences.” Acta Politologica 8 (2): 145-163. Zulianello, Μ. 2018. “Mobilizing Young Voters? A Cross-National Analysis of Contextual Factors in Pirate Voting.” European Politics and Society 19 (3): 282298, https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2017.1419666. Zulianello, Μ. 2020. “Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries.” Government and Opposition 55: 327-347, https://doi.org/10.1017/ gov.2019.21. Zulianello, Μ., A. Albertini, D. Ceccobelli. 2018. “A Populist Zeitgeist“! The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook.” The International Journal of Press!Politics 23 (4): 439-457, https://doi. org/10.1177/1940161218783836. Zulianello, Μ., D. Ceccobelli. 2020. “Don’t Call It Climate Populism: On Greta Thunberg’s Technocratic Ecocentrism.” Political Quarterly 91 (3): 623-631, https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12858. Zulianello, Μ., E. G. Larsen. 2021. “Populist Parties in European Parliament Elections: A New Dataset on Left, Right and
Valence Populism from 1979 to 2019.” Electoral Studies 71: 1-8, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102312.
Index Note’. Figures are indicated by italics. Tables are indicated by bold. Endnotes are indicated by the page number followed by ‘n’ and the endnote number e.g., 20nl refers to endnote 1 on page 20. Agrofert 7, 17, 39n29, 41, 62nl2, 89 ANO 3, 6, 17, 21,22, 25, 32, 33, 41, 46-8, 56, 59, 59n2, 68, 69, 71,73, 74, 75, 78-81,87n5, 88,90 anti-elitism 43, 52, 58, 60n5, 67, 89, 90 Babis, A. 3, 5, 7, 8, 17, 22-6, 33, 34n4, 35nl 1, 39n29, 39n34,41,42, 46-8, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 59n2, 60n5, 61 n 11, 61nl2, 63nl9, 74, 80-5, 81,83, 84, 87n5, 88-90, 91n2 Bârta, V. 41,42,45,46, 59n2 Berlusconi, S. 60n5 bribe 8, 12, 13, 19, 23, 34n2, 34n3, 37n25, 37n26; bribery 11,34n2, 34n3, 34n6, 34n7, 34nl0, 35nl8, 38n28,45, 68, 81, 89; bribe-taking 8 Brussels 8, 20, 53, 60n5, 62nl2, 84 bureaucracy 10, 19, 34n7 businessman 21, 33, 38n28,41,42, 56, 88 capitalism 31 capture 13, 18, 65 Chamber of Deputies 24, 31, 32, 39n29, 39n30,40n39,40n41,45, 47, 48, 55, 59nl, 67, 74, 76n3, 77, 81, 87n5, 90 Christian and Democratic UnionCzechoslovak People’s Party see KDU-CSL Civic Democratic Party see ODS clientelism 10, 11,24, 34n6, 37n27, 57, 68,81 collusion 34n6, 68, 81 communication 3-6, 14, 26, 42,44, 53, 56, 59, 67, 80, 81, 92n4, 92n5; Babis’s 35nl 1,46, 86; mainstream 3, 75; Pirate 6, 77-9, 83, 85, 86, 87n5, 87n6, 87n8, 90; populist 2, 3, 17, 23,44,45, 48-51, 58, 60nl0, 64-71, 74, 76n6, 81-5, 90 communism 1,18 Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia see KSCM conservatism 13 corruption: constructivist approach to 11-14, 18, 53; definition 7-11, 53; fight against 1, 2, 12-14, 16, 18-20, 38n28, 50, 52, 55,57, 58,
65,69, 74,85,91; perceptions of 27, 28, 31, 32, 39n35, 51-3, 64 COVID-19 7, 15,47 crime 18; economic 11, 15, 18, 26, 39n29; organised 15, 17, 18, 20, 34n9, 38n28, 89 crisis: economic 7, 31,39n35; financial 65; immigration 92n4; pandemic 7, 47; refugee 48 CSSD 8, 15, 18-20, 26, 31, 32, 34n3, 36nl6, 36nl9, 39n34,40n39,47-9, 59, 62nl4,71,72,73, 90, 91,92n4 Czech Pirate Party see pirates Czech Social Democratic Party see CSSD Dalik, Μ. 37n26 Dawn 32, 33, 47, 48, 57, 71, 73, 74, 87n5 democracy 28, 31,48, 57, 59n3, 63nl6, 66, 88; direct 21,32, 33,43,48, 50, 56, 57, 82, 87n5, 90; intra-party 80; liberal 11, 58; representative 48, 58, 85, 90
114 Index discourse 12, 34n5,44, 66, 80; academic 4; analysis of 68; of corruption 5, 11, 28; populist 5, 14,21,43,44, 52, 79, 89; types of 18, 20, 21,33, 52, 91 distrust 16, 20, 29, 45, 77, 78, 86n2 election 3,6,7, 11, 17-22,27,28, 31-3, 34n3, 36nl6, 36n!7, 36n21, 37n24n 37n26n 37n27, 39n29, 40n36, 40n39, 41,42, 45-50, 54-7, 62n 14; 52, 63nl5, 63nl8, 64-8, 70, 71, 74, 75, 75nl, 77, 78,80,81,83-5, 87n5, 87n6, 87n7, 88, 90, 91, 92n4; first-order 45, 77; municipal 40n41; presidential 42, 49, 53, 62nl3, 62nl4; second-order 77, 78 elite: corrupt/bad 2, 5,12, 17, 21-3, 28, 33,41-3, 46, 48, 50, 52-4, 56-8, 60n5, 62nl4, 64, 69-71, 76n7, 81-6, 89-91; cultural 43, 54, 58, 63nl7, 86; economic 18, 33, 41, 60n5, 63n 17, 75, 86; foreign 49, 62nl2, 84; new 27; political 1, 12, 21, 23, 32, 33, 43, 45, 47,48,51,54-6, 60n5, 80 elitism 59n3 embezzlement 34n6, 68, 81 entrepreneur 17, 41-3, 45,46, 54, 62nl2 expert 12, 21,48, 90; governments of 58; legitimacy 56; solutions 56; surveys 44, 68 Facebook 53, 54, 57, 66, 67, 78, 80, 82 familism 34n6, 68, 81 favouritism 34n6, 68, 81 Fortuyn, P. 43, 60n5 Freedom and Direct Democracy see SPD gift-giving 34n7 godfather 21,23, 37, 38, 39n31,41,42, 46,48, 54, 69-71,88, 92n6 grievance theory 40n37 Havel, V. 15, 50 hegemony 61nl0 ideational approach 2,43,44, 60n4, 61n7, 61nl0, 69 immigration 15, 40n37,47,48, 53, 61n6, 63nl6, 65, 75,80, 92n4 inequality 40n38 Kalousek, Μ. 24, 25 KDU-CSL 20, 31,40n39,71,72,73 kick-back 34n6, 68, 81 Klaus, V. 16, 19, 35nl5, 36nl5, 36nl6, 36nl9, 37n24, 37n25, 37n27, 50,91nl KSÙM 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 31,40n39,47, 48, 55, 56, 59,
63nl7, 71,72,73, 76n7, 90,91 lobbyist 19-21, 23, 37n26, 69-71 mafia 20,21,48, 56, 80 Manichean 43, 82, 89; division 35nl5, 52, 59n3,70,91n3 manifesto 14, 17-19, 21,34n3, 36nl6, 36n23, 36n24,45, 48, 49, 55-7, 63nl8, 64-9, 71,72, 74, 75, 75n3, 76n4, 76n7; see also programme MaxQda 68, 81 Mayors and Independents see STAN media 10, 12, 19, 20, 24, 26, 37n26, 38n28,45,46,51,52, 54, 57, 58, 63nl7, 84, 92n6; Babies 51,74; corrupt 53; new 10; social 51,61n8, 67,80 metaphor 10, 34n8, 68 migration 66, 70, 84, 92n4 movement 3, 17, 23-5, 32, 33,40n41, 40n42,41,46, 59n2, 69, 70, 78, 80, 81, 88-91 Nagygate affaire 21,23,24, 33n 1, 36nl7, 38n28, 39n32, 39n33,42, 55, 91nl nativism 4, 45, 48, 60n6, 66, 75, 92n4 Naygovâ, J. 38n28 Neöas, P. 21, 23, 54, 36nl7, 38n28, 47, 55, 59nl,91nl neoliberalism 13, 18-21, 33, 34n5,45, 52, 55, 58,91n3,92n3 neo-patrimonialism see patrimonialism nepotism 9, 34n6, 68, 81 newness 30, 45; project of 30 NGOs 12, 54, 58 ODS 7, 19-21,24, 31-3, 34n3, 34n5, 36nl6, 36nl7, 37n25, 37n26, 37n27, 38n28,40n39,40n41,45-7,49, 55, 72, 73, 89,91nl,92n6 officials 9-12,19, 21, 51, 52, 56, 92n6; Brussels 19, 60n5; corrupt 33, 34n5, 37n25, 58, 92n3
Index Okamura, T. 2, 32, 33,40n35, 42, 47, 48, 53, 57, 58, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 87n5, 87n6 Oligarch 21,57, 58,71 opposition 1,3, 7, 14, 15, 21,27, 32, 33, 36nl6, 42,45, 47, 50, 58, 67, 73, 74, 77, 83, 87n7,88,91nl othering 61n6, 63nl6 party: anti-establishment 6, 6nl, 31, 32, 78, 85, 90; business-firm 33; left-wing 15, 18, 20,47, 62nl4, 75; mainstream/ established 3, 5, 14,41,46, 65,66, 75, 80, 90, 92n4, 92n5; new 28, 30-3, 40n38, 68, 77; pirate (see pirates); political 3, 4, 5, 7, 14, 16-18, 20-2, 24, 27, 28,29, 30, 34n2, 34n3, 36nl6, 36n 17, 37n25, 37n27,40n40,41,51, 53-7, 65, 67-70, 72, 73, 83, 87n5, 87n7, 88, 90, 91nl; populist 14, 17, 33, 41,45,47-9, 57, 59, 59n 1, 66, 71, 74, 75, 78, 79, 85; right-wing 20, 37n26, 47, 60n6, 61n6, 63nl8, 65, 67 patrimonialism 10, 35n 11; neopatrimonialism 35n 11,46, 62nl2, 89 patronage 10, 11 people: normal/ordinary 42,46, 50, 58, 62nl2, 82; people-centrism 43, 50, 60n6, 67, 90; pure/good 2, 14, 17,43, 46, 52-4, 60n6, 69-71, 76n7, 81, 86, 89; as sovereign/sovereignty of 43, 50, 62nlO, 71,82 pirates 3, 6, 26, 32, 40n42,47,48, 68, 71,73, 77-81, 81, 82-6, 83, 84, 86n2, 86n4, 87n5,87n7,90 pluralism 54, 59n3 politician 1,8-10, 12-17, 19, 21,23-5, 28, 30-2, 34n2, 38n28,40n35,40n36, 40n39, 41-4, 46-9, 51, 54-9, 61n6, 61 n7, 62nl3, 69-71,75n2, 77, 79, 80, 83, 85, 88, 90, 91, 92n5, 92n6; corrupt 12, 23, 31, 50, 53, 56, 80-2, 86, 92n3; populist 35nl 1, 39n33, 45, 58, 60n5, 65 populism 1,2, 4, 6, 6nl, 7, 13, 14, 21, 31,35nl 1,41-3, 45,49, 50, 56, 58, 59, 59n3, 60n4, 60n6, 61n6, 61n7, 61n8, 61n9, 61П10, 62nl5, 64-68, 70, 71, 74, 75, 77-79, 82,
83, 85, 86, 86n4, 90, 92n3, 92n4; centrist 6nl, 31,46, 86; conceptualisation of 2, 3, 5,44, 69, 75nl, 76n5; ethnopopulism 46; forms 115 of 4,43, 46; left-wing 43, 76n7; liberal 60n4,79; measuring 2,44,66, 68; mediated 51; right-wing 43,48, 51, 53, 55, 60n6, 61n6; technocratic 46, 56, 86; valence 46 privatisation 13, 15-18, 20, 36nl9, 36n20,71 programme 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 33, 36nl7,36n21,41,54, 57,64, 67, 71,74, 76n6, 76n8, 90; see also manifesto Public Affairs 32, 33,41,45,46, 51, 59n 1, 59n2; see also VV Rath, D. 8 referendum 42, 56, 57, 82 rhetoric: of political actors 14, 17, 18, 33, 35nl 1, 37n26, 39n35, 41,45-50, 56, 58, 60n5, 61 n9, 77, 79, 87n7, 91; anti-corruption 1-6, 11, 12, 17,27,30, 32, 35n 11, 36n22, 51,63n 16, 64, 65, 74, 75, 80, 82, 90; anti-establishment 31,32, 68, 78; nativist 61n6, 77; populist 41,42, 49, 52, 59, 61n4, 62nl3, 65,74, 90,91 Rusnok, J. 22, 55 signifier: empty 12, 14, 43, 58; floating 12, 43; without signified 12 Slachta, R. 23, 38n28, 90, 91 Sobotka, B. 74 socialism 13 SPD 3, 6, 21, 32, 33, 40n35, 40n41,47, 48, 53, 55-7, 59, 68, 71,73, 74, 78-81, 87n5, 87n7 SPR-RSC 45, 48, 72, 76n6 STAN 73, 87n7, 88, 89 Stork’s Nest 21, 24-6, 39n29 TOP09 18, 20, 25, 32, 37n26,40n39, 72, 73 Topolânek, Μ. 37n26, 45, 62nl3, 91nl transformation 2, 3,15, 30, 32,47, 62nll, 63nl5, 63nl6, 65, 66, 86n3; economic 20; post-socialist 17,18 transparency 7, 8, 20, 21, 55, 85 triplet 3, 69, 70, 81-5 Trump, D. 42, 60n5 trust 9, 27, 39n35,40n36, 52, 55, 56, 62nl5, 63nl5, 90 tunneling 15, 36nl9, 37n27
116 Index volatility 28, 30, 31, 33 VV 41,45, 46,48, 55, 57, 59, 59nl, 58, 70, 71,72, 74; see also Public Affairs welfare 71,92n6; chauvinism 47, 66 Bayerlacho Stastsbibilothes Zeitgeist 59, 65, 66, 90,92n4, 92n5 Zeman, Μ. 3, 5, 22, 26, 36n 16, 36nl9, 37n27, 39n31, 39n34,42,49, 50, 53, 55,57, 62nl3,62nl4 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Naxera, Vladimír 1986- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1079196498 |
| author_facet | Naxera, Vladimír 1986- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Naxera, Vladimír 1986- |
| author_variant | v n vn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049309139 |
| contents | Introduction -- (Anti-)Corruption (Not Only) in the Czech Way: On the Road to Populism? -- Populism and Anti-Corruption -- "Mainstreamisation of Populists" and "Mainstream Inclination to Populist Principles?" -- The Subject of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties -- Populism, Anti-Corruption, and the Czech Pirate Party -- Concluding Remarks |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1409124664 (DE-599)BVBBV049309139 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04911nam a2200709 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049309139</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240110 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230901s2023 |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781032282534</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-032-28253-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781032282534</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-03-228253-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1409124664</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049309139</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Naxera, Vladimír</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1079196498</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Anti-corruption and populism</subfield><subfield code="b">the Czech experience</subfield><subfield code="c">Vladimír Naxera</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London ; New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">[2023]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ix, 116 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- (Anti-)Corruption (Not Only) in the Czech Way: On the Road to Populism? -- Populism and Anti-Corruption -- "Mainstreamisation of Populists" and "Mainstream Inclination to Populist Principles?" -- The Subject of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties -- Populism, Anti-Corruption, and the Czech Pirate Party -- Concluding Remarks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book assesses what corruption means for populists, and the anti-corruption rhetoric of populist actors. The author uses the case study of Czech politicians to show how populist politicians exploit the notion of corruption in their communication. Using many examples of different political statements (by presidents, party leaders, MPs, etc.), the populist discourse of corruption is discussed in the context of other discourses presented in Czech politics. The author analyses both Czech (not only populist) political party election manifestos and the political communication on social media from Czech anti-establishment and populist political parties (ANO, Freedom and Direct Democracy, and Pirates). Based on an extensive conceptual framework the book also focuses on whether mainstream parties respond to the success of populists by adopting populist anti-corruption rhetoric themselves and the similarities and differences between the approaches they adopt. Understanding the processes of more than thirty years of Czech post-communist politics, and offering a theoretical and methodological framework applicable to research conducted in other contexts, this book will appeal to scholars of political science, sociology and economics"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Kommunikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134262-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bekämpfung</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7740893-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Populismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129521-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Korruption</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4564162-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political corruption / Czech Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Populism / Czech Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politicians / Czech Republic / Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication in politics / Czech Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Political aspects / Czech Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Czech Republic / Politics and government / 1993-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication in politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politicians / Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politics and government</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Populism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric / Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Czech Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Since 1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Populismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129521-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Politische Kommunikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134262-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Korruption</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4564162-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bekämpfung</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7740893-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-032-28269-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-003-29601-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20240110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034570275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">070.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Tschechien |
| id | DE-604.BV049309139 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:40:27Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:01:09Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781032282534 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034570275 |
| oclc_num | 1409124664 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | ix, 116 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20240110 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Naxera, Vladimír 1986- Verfasser (DE-588)1079196498 aut Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience Vladimír Naxera London ; New York Routledge [2023] ix, 116 Seiten Diagramme 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Introduction -- (Anti-)Corruption (Not Only) in the Czech Way: On the Road to Populism? -- Populism and Anti-Corruption -- "Mainstreamisation of Populists" and "Mainstream Inclination to Populist Principles?" -- The Subject of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties -- Populism, Anti-Corruption, and the Czech Pirate Party -- Concluding Remarks "This book assesses what corruption means for populists, and the anti-corruption rhetoric of populist actors. The author uses the case study of Czech politicians to show how populist politicians exploit the notion of corruption in their communication. Using many examples of different political statements (by presidents, party leaders, MPs, etc.), the populist discourse of corruption is discussed in the context of other discourses presented in Czech politics. The author analyses both Czech (not only populist) political party election manifestos and the political communication on social media from Czech anti-establishment and populist political parties (ANO, Freedom and Direct Democracy, and Pirates). Based on an extensive conceptual framework the book also focuses on whether mainstream parties respond to the success of populists by adopting populist anti-corruption rhetoric themselves and the similarities and differences between the approaches they adopt. Understanding the processes of more than thirty years of Czech post-communist politics, and offering a theoretical and methodological framework applicable to research conducted in other contexts, this book will appeal to scholars of political science, sociology and economics"-- Politische Kommunikation (DE-588)4134262-8 gnd rswk-swf Bekämpfung Motiv (DE-588)7740893-7 gnd rswk-swf Populismus (DE-588)4129521-3 gnd rswk-swf Korruption Motiv (DE-588)4564162-6 gnd rswk-swf Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd rswk-swf Political corruption / Czech Republic Populism / Czech Republic Politicians / Czech Republic / Attitudes Communication in politics / Czech Republic Rhetoric / Political aspects / Czech Republic Czech Republic / Politics and government / 1993- Communication in politics Political corruption Politicians / Attitudes Politics and government Populism Rhetoric / Political aspects Czech Republic Since 1993 Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 g Populismus (DE-588)4129521-3 s Politische Kommunikation (DE-588)4134262-8 s Korruption Motiv (DE-588)4564162-6 s Bekämpfung Motiv (DE-588)7740893-7 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-032-28269-5 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-003-29601-0 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
| spellingShingle | Naxera, Vladimír 1986- Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience Introduction -- (Anti-)Corruption (Not Only) in the Czech Way: On the Road to Populism? -- Populism and Anti-Corruption -- "Mainstreamisation of Populists" and "Mainstream Inclination to Populist Principles?" -- The Subject of Corruption in the Election Manifestos of Czech Political Parties -- Populism, Anti-Corruption, and the Czech Pirate Party -- Concluding Remarks Politische Kommunikation (DE-588)4134262-8 gnd Bekämpfung Motiv (DE-588)7740893-7 gnd Populismus (DE-588)4129521-3 gnd Korruption Motiv (DE-588)4564162-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4134262-8 (DE-588)7740893-7 (DE-588)4129521-3 (DE-588)4564162-6 (DE-588)4303381-7 |
| title | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience |
| title_auth | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience |
| title_exact_search | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience |
| title_full | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience Vladimír Naxera |
| title_fullStr | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience Vladimír Naxera |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anti-corruption and populism the Czech experience Vladimír Naxera |
| title_short | Anti-corruption and populism |
| title_sort | anti corruption and populism the czech experience |
| title_sub | the Czech experience |
| topic | Politische Kommunikation (DE-588)4134262-8 gnd Bekämpfung Motiv (DE-588)7740893-7 gnd Populismus (DE-588)4129521-3 gnd Korruption Motiv (DE-588)4564162-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Politische Kommunikation Bekämpfung Motiv Populismus Korruption Motiv Tschechien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034570275&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT naxeravladimir anticorruptionandpopulismtheczechexperience |