Intimate strangers: commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth
"This book explores the practice of commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and unpacks the inner workings of this practice that is marked by secrecy, distrust, and (anonymous) business relationships. It illustrates how 'truths' accelerate market expansion into the intimate spheres...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Ithaca, New York ; London
Cornell University Press
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
| Zusammenfassung: | "This book explores the practice of commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and unpacks the inner workings of this practice that is marked by secrecy, distrust, and (anonymous) business relationships. It illustrates how 'truths' accelerate market expansion into the intimate spheres of life that play out on women's bodies as mothers and workers"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xiv, 287 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781501771316 9781501769917 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049061658 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20231207 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230724s2023 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781501771316 |c paperback |9 978-1-5017-7131-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781501769917 |c hardback |9 978-1-5017-6991-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1370402564 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049061658 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-703 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a MS 3110 |0 (DE-625)123666: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Siegl, Veronika |d 1985- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1161223444 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intimate strangers |b commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |c Veronika Siegl |
| 264 | 1 | |a Ithaca, New York ; London |b Cornell University Press |c 2023 | |
| 300 | |a xiv, 287 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The Biopolitics of motherhood -- Secret conceptions -- Choreographing surrogacy -- Doing it business-style -- Technologies of alignment -- Laboring with happiness -- Ambivalences of freedom | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This book explores the practice of commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and unpacks the inner workings of this practice that is marked by secrecy, distrust, and (anonymous) business relationships. It illustrates how 'truths' accelerate market expansion into the intimate spheres of life that play out on women's bodies as mothers and workers"-- | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ersatzmutterschaft |0 (DE-588)7573650-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Russia | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Ukraine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Russia | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Ukraine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Russia | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Ukraine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Russia | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Ukraine | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Ersatzmutterschaft |0 (DE-588)7573650-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 9781501769931 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB |z 9781501769948 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20230830 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034323797 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 477 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 471 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 305.309 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 477 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 305.309 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 471 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804185369568083968 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Acknowledgments Preliminary Notes Introduction ix xiii 1 Part I 1. The Biopolitics of Motherhood 31 2. Secret Conceptions 56 3. Choreographing Surrogacy 83 Part II 4. Doing It Business-Style 112 5. Technologies of Alignment 136 6. Laboring with Happiness 165 7. Ambivalences of Freedom 193 Conclusion 217 Afterword: Surrogacy in Times of War 235 Appendix: Research Participants Notes References Index 241 249 257 281 Part III
References Abé, Nicola. 2022. “Bleiben Sie ruhig: Das Lebens Ihres Kindes hängt davon ab.” Der Spiegel, March 19. https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/leihmutterschaft-in-derukraine-ein-bunker-voller-babys-a-4a514c55-097a-4818-b379-98e5a82c7a67. Adrian, Stine Willum, and Charlotte Kroløkke. 2018. “Passport to Parenthood: Reproductive Pathways in and out of Denmark.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (2): 112-28. Agustin, Laura Maria. 2008. Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry. London: Zed Books. Ahmed, Sara. 2004a. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 22 (2): 117-39. ------ . 2004b. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ------ . 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. AI Jazeera. 2022. “UN: Over 5 Million People Have Fled Ukraine since Russia Invasion.” April 20. https://www.aljazeera.eom/news/2022/4/20/ more-than-5-million-ukrainians-have-fled-since-russian-invasion. Almeling, Rene. 2007. “Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material.” American Sociological Review 72 (3): 319-40. Anderson, John. 2016. “Religion, State and ‘Sovereign Democracy’ in Putin’s Russia.” Journal of Religious and Political Practice 2 (2): 249-66. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 3-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. Arvidsson, Anna, Sara Johnsdotter, and Birgitta Essén. 2015. “Views of Swedish Commissioning Parents Relating to the Exploitation Discourse in Using Transnational Surrogacy.” PLoS ONE 10 (5): e0126518. Ashwin, Sarah. 2000. “Introduction: Gender, State and Society in Soviet and PostSoviet Russia.” In Gender, State and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, edited by Sarah Ashwin, 1-29. London: Routledge. ------ . 2002. “The Influence of the Soviet Gender Order on Employment Behavior in Contemporary Russia.” Sociological Research 41 (1): 21-37. Attwood, Lynne, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova. 2018. “Introduction.” In Gender and Choice after Socialism, edited by Lynne Attwood, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova, xiii-xxiii. Cham: Springer International. Avdeyeva, Olga A. 2011. “Policy Experiment in Russia: Cash-for-Babies and Fertility Change.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State Society 18 (3): 361-86. Baker, Jordan. 2022. “The Desperate Mission to Get an Australian Baby out of Ukraine.” Sidney Morning Herald, March 4. https://www.smh.com.au/world/ europe/the-desperate-mission-to-get-an-australian-baby-out-of-ukraine20220303-p5alhj.html. 257
258 REFERENCES Bandak, Andreas, and Manpreet K. Janeja. 2018. “Introduction: Worth the Wait.” In Ethnographies of Waiting: Doubt, Hope and Uncertainty, edited by Manpreet K. Janeja and Andreas Bandak, 1-39. Oxford: Bloomsbury. Banerjee, Amrita. 2010. “Reorienting the Ethics of Transnational Surrogacy as a Feminist Pragmatist.” The Pluralist 5 (3): 107-27. Bärnreuther, Sandra. 2019. “When Time Stretches: Waiting and in Vitro Fertilization in India.” Collection Purușărtha 36: 269-85. ------. 2021. Substantial Relations: Making Global Reproductive Medicine in Postcolonial India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. BBC. 2022. “What Are the Sanctions on Russia and Are They Hurting Its Economy?” June 27. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60125659 . Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------. 2002. “Deciding Whether to Tell Children about Donor Insemination: An Unresolved Question in the United States.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 119-33. Berkeley: University of California Press. Becker, Gay, Anneliese Butler, and Robert D. Nachtigall. 2005. “Resemblance Talk: A Challenge for Parents Whose Children Were Conceived with Donor Gametes in the US.” Social Science Medicine 61 (6) : 1300-1309. Berend, Zsuzsa. 2016. The Online World of Surrogacy. New York: Berghahn Books. Berger, Miriam. 2022. “Putin Says He Will ‘Denazify’ Ukraine: Here’s the History behind
That Claim.” Washington Post, February 25. https://www. washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/24/putin-denazify-ukraine/. Bergmann, Sven. 2012. “Resemblance that Matters: On Transnational Anonymized Egg Donation in Two European IVF Clinics.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 331-55. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag. ------. 2014. Ausweichrouten der Reproduktion: Biomedizinische Mobilität und die Praxis der Eizellspende. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Bernstein, Anya. 2013. “An Inadvertent Sacrifice: Body Politics and Sovereign Power in the Pussy Riot Affair.” Critical Inquiry 40 (1): 220-41. Berntsen, Sine, Viveca Söderström-Anttila, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm, Hannele Laivuori, Anne Loft, Nan B. Oldereid, Liv Bente Romundstad, Christina Bergh, and Anja Pinborg. 2019. “The Health of Children Conceived by ART: ‘The Chicken or the Eggl’” Human Reproduction Update 25 (2): 137-58. Beskaravajnaya, Tatyana. 2020. “EKO den’gi.” Medvestik, April 20. https://medvestnik. ru/content/articles/EKO-dengi.html. Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2006. “Sacred Modernity: Religion, Infertility, and Technoscientific Conception around the Globe.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30 (4): 451-65. Bilefsky, Dan, Richard Pérez-Peña, and Eric Nagourney. 2022. “The Roots of the Ukraine War: How the Crisis Developed.” New York Times, April 21. https:// www.nytimes.com/article/russia-ukraine-nato-europe.html . Blum, Susan D. 2007. Lies that Bind: Chinese Truth, Other Truths.
Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Bondar, Yuliya. 2017. “Sud obyazal surrogatnuyu mat’ otdat’ detej zakazchikam.” Medportal, August 10. https://medportal.ru/mednovosti/ sud-obyazal-surrogatnuyu-mat-otdat-detey-zakazchikam/.
REFERENCES 259 Boris, Eileen, and Rhacel Salazar Parreñas. 2010. “Introduction.” In Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies and the Politics of Care, 1-17. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Borozdina, Ekaterina, Anna Rotkirch, Anna Temkina, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2016. “Using Maternity Capital: Citizen Distrust of Russian Family Policy.” European Journal of Women s Studies 23 (1): 60-75. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2007. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bowdler, Neil. 2020. “Russia Hopes ‘Test-Tube Babies’ Will Boost Birthrates.” Radio Free Europe, February 15. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-hopes֊test-tubebabies-will-boost֊birthrates/30434656.html. Brednikova, Olga, Nadya Nartova, and Olga Tkach. 2009. “Assisted Reproduction in Russia: Legal Regulations and Public Debates.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 43-56. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Brennan, Christopher. 2014. “Russia Bans Adoptions to Countries Where Gay Marriage Is Legal.” Moscow Times, February 13. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/02/13/ russia-bans-adoptions-to-countries-where-gay-marriage-is-legal-a32064. Butler, Judith. 2015. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge. Callaghan, Louise. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers Fear Pressure to Flee Ukraine.” The Times, February 20. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ surrogate-mothers-fear-pressure-to-flee-ukraine-gsntx9z7f. Carthaus, Anna. 2022. “Ukrainische
Leihmütter zwischen den Fronten.” Deutsche Welle, March 23. https://www.dw.com/de/ ukrainische-leihm%C3%BCtter-zwischen-den-fronten/a-61263581. Chak, Kerry. 2013. “Ukraine Has the Worst Roads and the Best Reproductive Medicine in the World.” News Europe, February 6. http://newseurope.info/ukraine-hasthe-worst-roads-and-the-best-reproductive-medicine-in-theworld/. Chemodanova, Ksenia. 2019. “Dorogo i opasno: Kak surrogatnye materi obmanyvayut zakazchikov.” Gazeta, October 31. https://www.gazeta.ru/ business/2019/08/28/12608059.shtml. CNN. 2022. “‘We Walked 8 Miles with a Newborn’: US Couple Describes Their Dangerous Escape from Ukraine.” March 3. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=APhWmeRHgxc. Cohen, Lawrence. 1999. “Where It Hurts: Indian Material for an Ethics of Organ Transplantation.” Daedalus 128 (4): 135-65. ------. 2005. “Operability, Bioavailability, and Exception.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, 79-90. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Constable, Nicole. 2006. “Brides, Maids, and Prostitutes: Reflections on the Study of ‘Trafficked’ Women.” PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 3 (2): 1-25. ------. 2009. “The Commodification of Intimacy: Marriage, Sex, and Reproductive Labor.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 38 (1): 49-64. Cooper, Melinda, and Catherine Waldby. 2014. Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
260 REFERENCES Corea, Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper and Row. Corrigan, Oonagh. 2003. “Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.” Sociology of Health Illness 25 (7): 768-92. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and World Health Organization, eds. 2002. “International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.” CIOMS. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/ uploads/2016/08/International_Ethical_Guidelines_for_Biomedical_Research_ Involving_Human_Subjects.pdf. Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 1994. “The Technocratic Body: American Childbirth as Cultural Expression.” Social Science Medicine 38 (8): 1125-40. De Lacey, Sheryl. 2002. “IVF as Lottery or Investment: Contesting Metaphors in Discourses of Infertility.” Nursing Inquiry 9 (1): 43-51. Dempsey, Deborah. 2015. “Relating across International Borders: Gay Men Forming Families through Overseas Surrogacy.” In Globalized Fatherhood, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn, Wendy Chavkin, and José-Alberto Navarro, 267-90. New York: Berghahn Books. Deomampo, Daisy. 2013a. “Transnational Surrogacy in India: Interrogating Power and Women’s Agency.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 167-88. ------. 2013b. “Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism.” Gender Society 27 (4): 514-37. ------. 2016. Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press. Dionisius, Sarah. 2015. “Queer Matters: Family-Building Processes of Lesbian Couples Using Donor
Insemination.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (3): 283-301. Disney, Tom. 2015. “Complex Spaces of Orphan Care—a Russian Therapeutic Children’s Community.” Children’s Geographies 13 (1): 30-43. ------. 2017. “The Orphanage as an Institution of Coercive Mobility.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (8): 1905-21. Dow, Katharine. 2015. “‘A Nine-Month Head-Start’: The Maternal Bond and Surrogacy.” Ethnos 82 (1): 1-19. ------. 2016. Making a Good Life: An Ethnography ofNature, Ethics, and Reproduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Druzenko, Gennadiy. 2013. “Ukraine.” In International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level, edited by Katarina Trimmings and Paul Beaumont, 357-65. Studies in Private International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Dumit, Joseph, and Robbie Davis-Floyd. 1998. “Cyborg Babies: Children from the Third Millennium.” In Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, edited by Joseph Dumit, 1-20. New York: Routledge. Dushina, Anastasia, Yuliya Kersha, Tatyana Larkina, and Daria Provorova. 2016. “Legitimatsiya Kommercheskogo Surrogatnogo Materinstva v Rossii.” Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya 17 (1): 62-79. Duttagupta, Ishani. 2015. “Why Surrogacy Issue Emerges after Nepal Earthquake.” Economic Times, May 5. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/ globalindian/why-surrogacy-issue-emerges-after-nepal-earthquake/. Ertman, Martha Μ. 2010. “The Upside of Baby Markets.” In Baby Markets: Money and the New Politics of Creating Families, edited by Michele Goodwin, 23-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
REFERENCES 261 Essig, Laurie. 1999. Queer in Russia: A Story of Sex, Self, and the Other. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2018. “Informing Offspring of Their Conception by Gamete or Embryo Donation: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 109 (4): 601-5. European Social Survey. 2017. ESS Round 8 (2016/2017) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC. Fassin, Didier. 2009. “Moral Economies Revisited.” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 64 (6): 1237-66. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. Feldman, Ilana. 2007. “The Quaker Way: Ethical Labor and Humanitarian Relief.” American Ethnologist 34 (4): 689-705. Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Finch, Janet. 2007. “Displaying Families.” Sociology 41 (1): 65-81. Fine, Cordelia. 2017. Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Sex of Our Gendered Minds. London: Icon Books. Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: William Morrow. Fisher, Max. “The Real Reason Russia Wants to Ban Adoptions by‘Dangerous’ American Families.” Washington Post, December 28. https.7/www. washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/12/28/the-real-reason-russiawants-to-ban-adoptions-by-dangerous-american-families/. Fixmer-Oraiz, Natalie. 2013. “Speaking of Solidarity: Transnational Gestational Surrogacy and the Rhetorics of
Reproductive (In)Justice.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 126-63. Flatley, Jonathan. 2008. Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Førde, Kristin Engh. 2016. Intimate Distance: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. Oslo: University of Oslo. ------ . 2017. “Fair Play in a Dirty Field: The Ethical Work of Commissioning Surrogacy in India.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 37-48. New York: Routledge. Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1, An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books. ------ . 1987. The Foucault Reader. Edited by Paul Rabinów. New York: Pantheon Books. ------ . 1990. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 2, The Use ofPleasure. New York: Vintage Books. ------ . 1997. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Vol. 1 of The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Edited by Paul Rabinów. London: Penguin Books. Fourcade, Marion, and Kieran Healy. 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 285-311. France 24. 2020. “Russia Funds IVF Baby Boom to Battle Population Slump.” January 20. https://www.france24.eom/en/20200130-russia-funds-ivf-babyboom-to-battle-population-slump. Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: Cultural Account ofAssisted Conception. London: Routledge. ------ . 1998. “Making Miracles: Scientific Progress and the Facts of Life.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, edited
262 REFERENCES by Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 102-17. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ------ . 2012. “Five Million Miracle Babies Later: Biocultural Legacies of ГѴЕ” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 27-58. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag. ------ . 2013. Biological Relatives: TVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Franklin, Sarah, and Helena Ragoné. 1998. “Introduction.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, edited by Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 1-14. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Fujimura, Clementine K. 2005. Russia’s Abandoned Children: An Intimate Understanding. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. Funk, Nanette. 2004. “Feminist Critiques of Liberalism: Can They Travel East? Their Relevance in Eastern and Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (3): 695-726. Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2013. Putin kaputt!? Russlands neue Protestkultur. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Gal, Susan. 2002. “A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction.” Differences: A Journal ofFeminist Cultural Studies 13 (1): 77-95. Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Garner-Purkis, Zak. 2022. “‘We Hope No Missiles Hit Hospitals’: The Ukrainian Woman Caught between Scared Surrogate Mums and Panicking Parents.” My
London, March 7. https://www.mylondon.news/news/uk-world-news/ we-hope-no-missiles-hit-23317102. Gershon, Ilana. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537-55. Gilligan, Carol. 2003. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. ------ . 1989. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18: 123-32. Golombok, S., A. Brewaeys, Μ. T. Giavazzi, D. Guerra, F. MacCallum, and J. Rust. 2002. “The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: The Transition to Adolescence.” Human Reproduction 17 (3): 830-40. Grigoryan, Anzhelina, and Yana Zainitdinova. 2019. “Inostrantsy massovo zakazyvayut surrogatnoe materinstvo u rossiyanok za million rublej.” Riafan, July 23. https:// riafan.ru/1189990-inostrancy-massovo-zakazyvayut-surrogatnoe-materinstvou-rossiyanok-za-million-rublei. Gryshchenko, Mykola, and Alexey Pravdyuk. 2016. “Gestational Surrogacy in Ukraine.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, edited by E. Scott Sills, 250-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grytsenko, Oksana. 2020. “The Stranded Babies of Kyiv and the Women Who Give Birth for Money.” The Guardian, June 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/ the-stranded-babies-of-kyiv-and-the-women-who֊give-birth-for-money. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny. 2015. “Reproduction in Transition: Cross-Border Egg Donation, Biodesirability and New Reproductive Subjectivities on the
European Fertility Market.” Gender, Place Culture 22 (1): 107-22.
REFERENCES 263 ------. 2016. “Grammars of Kinship: Biological Motherhood and Assisted Reproduction in the Age of Epigenetics.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41 (3): 483-506. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny, and Elżbieta Korolczuk. 2016. “Reproducing Politics: The Politicisation of Patients’ Identities and Assisted Reproduction in Poland and Sweden.” Sociology of Health Illness 38 (7): 1074-91. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny, Elżbieta Korolczuk, and Signe Mezinska. 2020. “Surrogacy Relationships: A Critical Interpretative Review.” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 125 (0): 183-91. Gupta, Jyotsna Agnihotri, and Annemiek Richters. 2008. “Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination.” Journal ofBioethical Inquiry 5 (4): 239-49. Guseva, Alya. 2020. “Scandals, Morality Wars, and the Field of Reproductive Surrogacy in Ukraine.” Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter 21 (3): 4-10. Guseva, Alya, and Vyacheslav Lokshin. 2019. “Medical Conceptions of Control in the Field of Commercial Surrogacy in Kazakhstan.” Salute e Società 1: 26-43. Hage, Ghassan. 2009a. “Introduction.” In Waiting, edited by Ghassan Hage, 1-12. Victoria: Melbourne University Press. ------. 2009b. “Waiting Out the Crisis: On Stuckedness and Governmentality.” In Waiting, edited by Ghassan Hage, 97-106. Victoria: Melbourne University Press. Halliday, Jane, Sharon Lewis, Joanne Kennedy, David P. Burgner, Markus Juonala, Karin Hammarberg, David J. Amor, Lex W. Doyle, Richard Saffery, Sarath Ranganathan, Liam Welsh,
Michael Cheung, John McBain, Stephen J.C. Hearps, and Robert McLachlan. 2019. “Health of Adults Aged 22 to 35 Years Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.” Fertility and Sterility 112 (1): 130-39. Hardt, Michael. 1999. “Affective Labor.” Boundary 2 26 (2): 89-100. Harrison, Laura. 2016. Brown Bodies, White Babies: The Politics of Cross-Racial Surrogacy. New York: New York University Press. Hawley, Samantha. 2018. “Surrogacy in Ukraine in Spotlight after Disabled Child Abandoned.” ABC News, August 20. https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/ am/surrogacy-in-ukraine-in-spotlight/1 1430452. Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hellman, Andrew, and Glenn Cohen. 2017. “Prohibiting Sperm Donor Anonymity in the US and Possible Effects on Recruitment and Compensation.” BioNews (blog), April 4. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95954. Hemmings, Clare, and Amal Treacher Kabesh. 2013. “The Feminist Subject of Agency: Recognition and Affect in Encounters with ‘the Other.’” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 29-46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Heut, Nathalia, and Naira Davlashyan. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers, Babies and Frozen Embryos Trapped by Ukraine War as IVF Parents Watch in Horror.” Euronews, March 18. https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/03/ll/surrogacy-in-crisis-asukraine-war-leaves-newborns-stranded-in-bomb-shelters-and-families- . Hibino, Yuri, and Yosuke Shimazono. 2013. “Becoming a Surrogate Online: ‘Message Board’ Surrogacy in Thailand.” Asian
Bioethics Review 5 (1): 56-72. Hildebrand, Sarah, Gerhild Perl, Julia Rehsmann, and Veronika Siegl, eds. 2018. hope. Basel: Christoph Merian Verlag, https://www.merianverlag.ch/produkt/ fotografie/hope/b79ed4db-c980-4e41 -b450-el3b75244e8e.html.
264 REFERENCES Hochschild, Arlie. 2012. “Back Stage of the Global Free Market: Nannies and Surrogates.” In Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen, edited by Hans-Georg Soeffner, 1125-38. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2000. “Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value.” In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, edited by Anthony Giddens and Will Hutton, 130-46. London: Jonathan Cape. ------. 2003. The Managed Heart: Commercialization ofHuman Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. Hoeyer, Klaus, and Linda F. Hogle. 2014. “Informed Consent: The Politics of Intent and Practice in Medical Research Ethics.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 43 (1): 347-62. Hofmann, Susanne, and Adi Moreno. 2016. “Introduction. Global Intimate Economies: Discontents and Debates.” In Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions, and Sexualities on the Global Market, edited by Susanne Hofmann and Adi Moreno, 1-29. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Holmgren, Beth. 2013. “Toward an Understanding of Gendered Agency in Contemporary Russia.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3): 535-42. Hovav, April. 2020. “Cutting out the Surrogate: Caesarean Sections in the Mexican Surrogacy Industry.” Social Science Medicine 256: 113-63. Human Rights Watch. 2014. “Abandoned by the State: Violence, Neglect, and Isolation for Children with Disabilities in Russian Orphanages.” https://www.hrw.org/ sites/default/files/reports/russia0914_ForUploadweb.pdf. larskaia-Smirnova, Elena, and Pavel Romanov. 2012. “Doing Class in Social Welfare Discourses: Unfortunate
Families’ in Russia.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 85-106. Farnham: Ashgate. Inhorn, Marcia C. 1994. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ------ . 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and in Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. London: Routledge. ------ . 2004. “Privacy, Privatization, and the Politics of Patronage: Ethnographic Challenges to Penetrating the Secret World of Middle Eastern, Hospital-Based in Vitro Fertilization.” Social Science Ժ Medicine 59 (10): 2095-2108. ------ . 2007. Reproductive Disruptions: Gender, Technology, and Biopolitics in the New Millennium. London: Berghahn Books. ------ . 2011. “Globalization and Gametes: Reproductive ‘Tourism,’ Islamic Bioethics, and Middle Eastern Modernity.” Anthropology Medicine 18 (1): 87-103. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Frank van Balen. 2002. “Introduction. Interpreting Infertility: A View from the Social Sciences.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 3-32. Berkeley: University of California Press. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli. 2018. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In The International Encyclopedia ofAnthropology, edited by Hilary Callan, 1-6. New York: John Wiley Sons. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Pasquale Patrizio. 2012. “The Global Landscape of CrossBorder Reproductive Care: Twenty Key Findings for the New Millennium.” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 24
(3): 158-63. Interfax. 2009. “Glavnyj pediatr Rossii vystupayet protiv podderzhaniya na gosudarstvennom urovnye tekhnologii iskusstvyennogo oplodotvoreniya.” September 28. https://www.interfax-russia.ru/siberia/report/
REFERENCES 265 glavnyy-pediatr-rossii-vystupaet-protiv-podderzhaniya-na-gosudarstvennomurovne-tehnologii-iskusstvennogo-oplodotvoreniya. Issoupova, Olga. 2000. “From Duty to Pleasure? Motherhood in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia.” In Gender, State and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, edited by Sarah Ashwin, 30-54. London: Routledge. Isupova, Olga G. 2011. “Support through Patient Internet-Communities: Lived Experience of Russian in Vitro Fertilization Patients.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 6 (3): no. 5907 (n.p.) Jacobson, Heather. 2016. Labor ofLove: Gestational Surrogacy and the Work ofMaking Babies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Jadva, V., L. Blake, P. Casey, and S. Golombok. 2012. “Surrogacy Families 10 Years On: Relationship with the Surrogate, Decisions over Disclosure and Children’s Understanding of Their Surrogacy Origins.” Human Reproduction 27 (10): 3008-14. Kahn, Susan Martha. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account ofAssisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Kato, Brooke. 2022. “Ukrainian Surrogates Must Return to War Zone to Give Birth to Westerners’Babies.” New York Post, March 9. https://nypost.com/2022/03/09/ ukrainian-surrogates-must-return-to-war-zone-to-give-birth/. Kay, Rebecca. 2002. “A Liberation from Emancipation? Changing Discourses on Women’s Employment in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18 (1): 51-72. Kempadoo, Kamala, and Jo Doezema, eds. 1998. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition.
London: Routledge. Khodyakov, Dmitry. 2007. “Trust as a Process: A Three-Dimensional Approach.” Sociology41 (1): 115-32. Khvorostyanov, Natalia, and Daphna Yeshua-Katz. 2020. “Bad, Pathetic and Greedy Women: Expressions of Surrogate Motherhood Stigma in a Russian Online Forum.” Sex Roles 83 (7): 474-84. Kierans, Ciara, and Kirsten Bell. 2017. “Cultivating Ambivalence: Some Methodological Considerations for Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (2): 23-44. Kirpichenko, Maria. 2017. “Russian Legislative Practices and Debates on the Restriction of Wide Access to ARTs.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 232-48. New York: Routledge. ------. 2020. “Ideology of Simulation: The Material-Semiotic Production of the Surrogate in the Web Worldings of Russian Surrogacy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies (online), June 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506820922603. Klimchuk, Oleg, and Viktor Cheretski. 2018. “Ukraine’s Surrogacy Industry Leaves Parents in Limbo.” Deutsche Welle, September 7. https://www.dw.com/en/ ukraines-surrogacy-industry-leaves-parents-in֊limbo/a-45371478. Klomegah, Kester Kenn. 2021. “Moment of Truth: Russia Faces Demography Crisis.” Modern Diplomacy (blog), February 3. https.7/moderndiplomacy. eu/2021/02/03/moment-of-truth-russia-faces-demography-crisis/. Knecht, Michi, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck. 2012. “Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Introduction.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies ofKnowledge,
Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 11-26. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag.
266 REFERENCES Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Riverside. Kolesnikova, Varvara. 2021a. “RAHR nazvala zakonproyekt о surrogatnom materinstvye nekonstitutsionnym.” Vademecum, February 2. https://vademec. ru/news/2021/02/02/rarch-nazvala-zakonoproekt-o-surrogatnommaterinstve-nekonstitutsionnym/. ------. 2021b. “V kakom regulirovanii nuzhdayetsya rynok surrogatnogo materinstva v Rossii.” Vademecum, June 7. https.7Zvademec.ru/article/v_kakom_regulirovanii_ nuzhdaetsya_rynok_surrogatnogo_materinstva_v_rossii/. König, Anika. 2018. “Parents on the Move: German Intended Parents’ Experiences with Transnational Surrogacy.” In Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from India, Germany and Israel, edited by Sayani Mitra, Silke Schicktanz, and Tulsi Patel, 277-99. Cham: Springer International. König, Anika, Anindita Majumdar, and Heather Jacobson. 2020. “‘Pandemic Disruptions’ in Surrogacy Arrangements in Germany, U.S.A., and India during COVID-19.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly Rapid Response Blog Series, August 11. https://medanthroquarterly.org/rapid-response/2020Z08/ pandemic-disruptions-in-surrogacy-arrangements-in-germany-u-s-a/. Konrad, Monica. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. London: Berghahn Books. Korelina, Olga. 2020. ‘“A Flagrant Rights Violation’: State Investigators in Russia Reportedly Plan to Arrest Single Gay Fathers on Child Trafficking Charges.” Meduza, October 1.
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/01/a-flagrantrights-violation. Korolczuk, Elżbieta. 2014. “Terms of Engagement: Re-defining Identity and Infertility On-line.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 6 (2): 431-49. ------. 2016. “‘The Purest Citizens’ and ‘IVF Children’: Reproductive Citizenship in Contemporary Poland.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 3: 126-33. Krainova, Natalya. 2013. “Mizulina’s Surrogacy Ban Idea Ridiculed.” Moscow Times, November 11. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/2013/ll/ll/ mizulinas-surrogacy-ban-idea-ridiculed-a29455. Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø. 2014. “West Is Best: Affective Assemblages and Spanish Oöcytes.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (1): 57-71. ------. 2015. “Have Eggs, Will Travel: The Experiences and Ethics of Global Egg Donation.” Somatechnics 5 (1): 12-31. Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø, and Saumya Pant. 2012. “‘I Only Need Her Uterus’: Neo Liberal Discourses on Transnational Surrogacy.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 20 (4): 233-48. Kruglova, Anna. 2016. “Anything Can Happen: Everyday Morality and Social Theory in Russia.” PhD thesis, University of Toronto. Kurlenkova, Alexandra. 2018. “Ova Exchange Practices at a Moscow Fertility Clinic: Gift or Commodity?” In Health, Technologies, and Politics in Post-Soviet Settings, edited by Olga Zvonareva, Evgeniya Popova, and Klasien Horstman, 173-97. Cham: Springer International. Kuznetsova, Yevgeniya, and Yegor Gubernatorov. 2021. “Deputaty podgotovili zapryet na surrogatnoe materinstvo dlya odinokikh lyudej.” RBC, January 19. https://
www.rbc.ru/politics/19/01/2021/6006e6759a79472e23983481. Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
REFERENCES 267 Lally, Kathy, and Will Englund. 2012. Russia Fumes as U.S. Senate Passes Measure Aimed at Human Rights.” Washington Post, December 6. https://www. washingtonpost.com/world/europe/us-passes-magnitsky-bill-aimedatrussia/2012/12/06/262a5bba-3fd5-l Ie2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html. Lambek, Michael. 2010. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press. Leibetseder, Doris. 2020. “Precarious Bodily Performances in Queer and Transgender Reproduction with ART.” In Bodily Interventions and Intimate Labour: Understanding Bioprecarity, edited by Gabriele Griffin and Doris Leibetseder, 79-94. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Lemke, Thomas. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press. Lettow, Susanne. 2015. “Population, Race and Gender: On the Genealogy of the Modern Politics of Reproduction.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16(3): 267-82. Lewis, Sophie. 2019. “Surrogacy as Feminism: The Philanthrocapitalist Framing of Contract Pregnancy.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 40 (1): 1-38. Leykin, Inna. 2019. “The History and Afterlife of Soviet Demography: The Socialist Roots of Post-Soviet Neoliberalism.” Slavic Review 78 (1): 149-72. Lock, Margaret. 2001. “The Tempering of Medical Anthropology: Troubling Natural Categories.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (4): 478-92. Lock, Margaret, and Patricia Kauffert. 1998. “Introduction.” In Pragmatic Women and Body Politics, edited by Margaret Lock and Patricia A Kauffert, 1-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Loktionova,
Maria. 2020. “Minzdrav RF nameren izmenit’ zakon o surrogatnom materinstve s yanvarya.” Gazeta, October 21. https://www.gazeta.ru/social/ 2020/10/20/13326049.shtml. Lustenberger, Sibylle. 2016. “From Mumbai to Tel Aviv: Distance and Intimacy in Transnational Surrogacy Arrangements.” Journal ofMiddle East Women’s Studies 12 (2): 203-24. Luxmoore, Matthew. 2020. “The Putin Constitution: How Will It Change Russia?” Radio Free Europe, July 1. https://www.rfer].org/a/the-putin-constitution-howwill-it-change-russia/30699899.html. Maciejewska-Mroczek, Ewa. 2019. “Tactile Crease: The Embodiment of Anti-IVF Discourses in Poland.” Ethnologia Europaea 49 (1): 91-102. Maciejewska-Mroczek, Ewa, and Magdalena Radkowska-Walkowicz. 2017. “Between Monster Child and Innocent Baby: Managing Fear and Hope in Polish Debates on in Vitro Fertilization.” In Childhood, Literature and Science: Fragile Subjects, edited by Jutta Ahibeck, Päivi Lappalainen, Kati Launis, and Kirsi Tuohela, 184-95. London: Routledge. Magnus, Maria C., Allen J. Wilcox, Elin A. Fadum, Håkon K. Gjessing, Signe Opdahl, Petur В. Juliusson, Liv Bente Romundstad, and Siri E. Håberg. 2021. “Growth in Children Conceived by ART.” Human Reproduction 36 (4): 1074-82. Mair, Jonathan, Ann Kelly, and Casey High. 2016. “Introduction: Making Ignorance an Ethnographic Object.” In Anthropology ofIgnorance: An Ethnographic Approach, edited by Casey High, Ann Kelly, and Jonathan Mair, 1-32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Majumdar, Anindita. 2017. Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Makin՝ of Kin in India. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. Makarychev, Andrey, and Sergei Medvedev. 2015. “Biopolitics and Power in Putin’s Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 62 (1): 45-54.
268 REFERENCES Malich, Lisa. 2017. Die Gefühle der Schwangeren: Eine Geschichte somatischer Emotionalität (1780-2010). Bielefeld: Transcript. Mamo, Laura. 2007. Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Markens, Susan. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------ . 2012. “The Global Reproductive Health Market: U.S. Media Framings and Public Discourses about Transnational Surrogacy.” Social Science Medicine 74 (11): 1745-53. Martin, Emily. 2001. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis ofReproduction. Boston: Beacon Press. Mattingly, Cheryl. 2019. “Waiting.” Cambridge Journal ofAnthropology 37 (1): 17-31. Matza, Tomas. 2009. “Moscow’s Echo: Technologies of the Self, Publics, and Politics on the Russian Talk Show.” Cultural Anthropology 24 (3): 489-522. ------ . 2012.“ ‘Good Individualism’? Psychology, Ethics, and Neoliberalism in Postsocialist Russia.” American Ethnologist 39 (4): 804-18. Mauss, Marcel. 1966. The Gift: Forms and Functions ofExchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen West. Mayes, Christopher, Jane Williams, and Wendy Lipworth. 2018. “Conflicted Hope: Social Egg Freezing and Clinical Conflicts of Interest.” Health Sociology Review 27 (1): 45-59. Merz, Theo. 2020. “Single Fathers with Children via Surrogates Flee Russia amid Crackdown.” The Guardian, October 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/15/ single-fathers-in-russia-with-surrogate-babies-become-official-target. Mies, Maria. 1986. “Reproduktionstechnik als
sexistische und rassistische Bevölkerungspolitik.” In Frauen gegen Gentechnik und Reproduktionstechnologien, edited by А. К. Frauenpolitik, 44-47. Cologne: Kölner Volksblatt. Mishtal, Joanna. 2012. “Irrational Non-Reproduction? The ‘Dying Nation’ and the Postsocialist Logics of Declining Motherhood in Poland.” Anthropology drMedicine 19 (2): 153-69. ------ . 2015. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press. Mitra, Sayani. 2017. “Disruptive Embodiments: A Study of Risks and Disruptions during Commercial Surrogacy in India.” PhD thesis, Georg-August University of Göttingen. Mitra, Sayani, and Silke Schicktanz. 2016. “Failed Surrogate Conceptions: Social and Ethical Aspects of Preconception Disruptions during Commercial Surrogacy in India.” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 11 (1): 1-16. Mitter, Vera R. 2020. Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes of Women Treated for Subfertility and Children Born after in Vitro Fertilisation. Bern: University of Bern. Mohanty, Chandra Talpadé. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Boundary 2 12 (3) / 13 (1): 333-58. Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge. Moore, Cortney. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers Rescued from Ukraine War.” New York Post, April 18. https://nypost.com/2022/04/18/ project-dynamo-rescues-surrogate-mothers-from-ukraine-war/.
REFERENCES 269 Moreno, Adi. 2016. “Families on the Market Front.” In Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions, and Sexualities on the Global Market, edited by Susanne Hofmann and Adi Moreno, 233-59. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Morgan, Lynn, and Elizabeth Roberts. 2012. “Reproductive Governance in Latin America.” Anthropology Medicine 19 (2): 241-254. Motluk, Alison. 2022. “Ukraine’s Surrogacy Industry Has Put Women in Impossible Positions.” The Atlantic, March 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/ archive/2022/03/russia-invasion-ukraine-surrogate-family/623327/. Mouliarova, Ekaterina. 2019. “The Legal Regulation of Surrogacy in Russia.” Italian Journal of Public Law 11 (1): 393-433. Murray, Clare, and Susan Golombok. 2003. “To Tell or Not to Tell: The DecisionMaking Process of Egg-Donation Parents.” Human Fertility 6 (2): 89-95. Nahman, Michal. 2008. “Nodes of Desire: Romanian Egg Sellers, ‘Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (2): 65-82. ------. 2010. ‘“Embryos Are Our Baby’: Abridging Hope, Body and Nation in Transnational Ova Donation.” In Technologized Images, Technologized Bodies, edited by Jeanette Edwards, Penelope Harvey, and Peter Wade, 185-210. New York: Berghahn Books. ------. 2011. Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 626-33. Narotzky, Susana. 2018. “Rethinking the Concept of Labour.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 24 (SI): 29-43. Narotzky, Susana, and Niko Besnier. 2014. “Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the
Economy. An Introduction to Supplement 9.” Current Anthropology 55 (S9): S4-16. Nartova, Nadya. 2009. “Surrogate Motherhood and Sperm Donorship in the Russian Media: Normalising the Body.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 75-94. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Neal, Will. 2020. “Ukrainian Police in Baby-Mill Bust.” Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, April 29. https://www.occrp.org/en/ daily/12226-ukrainian-police-in-baby-mill-bust. Nebeling Petersen, Michael, Charlotte Kroløkke, and Lene Myong. 2017. “Dad and Daddy Assemblage: Resuturing the Nation through Transnational Surrogacy, Homosexuality, and Norwegian Exceptionalism.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 23 (1): 83-112. Nechepurenko, Ivan. 2013. “Rainbow Lamp Post Is Not Gay Propaganda, Prosecutors Say.” Moscow Times, September 24. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2013/09/24/ rainbow-lamppost-is-not-gay-propagandaprosecutors-say-a27983. Nordqvist, Petra. 2010. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Family Resemblances in Lesbian Donor Conception.” Sociology 44 (6): 1128-44. ------. 2014. “The Drive for Openness in Donor Conception: Disclosure and the Trouble with Real Life.” International Journal ofLaw, Policy and the Family 28 (3): 321-38. ------. 2021. “Telling Reproductive Stories: Social Scripts, Relationality and Donor Conception.” Sociology 55 (4): 677-95. Nordqvist, Petra, and Carol Smart. 2014. “Relational Lives, Relational Selves: Assisted Reproduction and the Impact on Grandparents.” In
Relatedness in Assisted Production: Families, Origins and Identities, edited by Tabitha Freeman,
270 REFERENCES Susanna Graham, Fatemela Ebtehaj, and Martin Richards, 548-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. North, Douglass C. 2010. Understanding the Process ofEconomic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Onisenko, Kostas. 2020. “Russian Orthodox Church Expressed Opposition to in Vitro Fertilization.” Orthodox Times, September 21. https://orthodoxtimes.com/ russian-orthodox-church-expressed-opposition-to-in-vitro-fertilization. Orejudo Prieto de los Mozos, Patricia. 2013. “Spain.” In International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level, edited by Katarina Trimmings and Paul Beaumont, 347-55. Studies in Private International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Palomera, Jaime, and Theodora Vetta. 2016. “Moral Economy: Rethinking a Radical Concept.” Anthropological Theory 16 (4): 413-32. Panchenko, Alexander. 2012. ‘“Popular Orthodoxy’ and Identity in Soviet and PostSoviet Russia: Ideology, Consumption and Competition.” In Soviet and PostSoviet Identities, edited by Mark Bassin and Catriona Kelly, 321-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pande, Amrita. 2009. “‘It May Be Her Eggs But It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology 32 (4): 379-97. ------. 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect MotherWorker.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35 (4): 969-92. ------. 2011. “Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India: Gifts for Global Sisters?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 618-25. ------ . 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial
Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press. ------. 2015. “Blood, Sweat and Dummy Tummies: Kin Labour and Transnational Surrogacy in India.” Anthropologica 57 (1): 53-62. ------ . 2016. “Surrogates Are Workers, Not Wombs.” The Hindu, August 29. https:// www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Surrogates-are-workers-not-wombs/ article 14594820.ece. ------. 2021. “Revisiting Surrogacy in India: Domino Effects of the Ban.” Journal of Gender Studies 30 (4): 395-405. Pande, Amrita, and Tessa Moll. 2018. “Gendered Bio-Responsibilities and Travelling Egg Providers from South Africa.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 6: 23-33. Parry, Bronwyn. 2015. “Narratives of Neoliberalism: ‘Clinical Labour’ in Context.” Medical Humanities 41 (1): 32-37. Pascual, Julia. 2022. “Des mères porteuses ukrainiennes prises au piège de la guerre.” Le Monde, April 24. https://www.lemonde.fr/m-le-mag/article/2022/04/24/desmeres-porteuses-ukrainiennes-prises-au-piege-de-la-guerre_6123417_4500055. html. Pático, Jennifer. 2005. “To Be Happy in a Mercedes: Tropes of Value and Ambivalent Visions of Marketization.” American Ethnologist 32 (3): 479-96. ------ . 2009. “For Love, Money, or Normalcy: Meanings of Strategy and Sentiment in the Russian-American Matchmaking Industry/’ Ethnos 74 (3): 307-30. Paxson, Heather. 2003. “With or against Nature? IVF, Gender and Reproductive Agency in Athens, Greece.” In “Reproduction Gone Awry,” special issue, Social Science Medicine 56 (9): 1853-66. Pennings, Guido. 2004. “Legal Harmonization and Reproductive Tourism in Europe.” Human Reproduction 19 (12):
2689-94.
REFERENCES 271 ------. 2009. “The Green Grass on the Other Side: Crossing Borders to Obtain Infertility Treatment.” Facts, Views Vision in ObGyn 1(1): 1-6. ------. 2010. “The Rough Guide to Insemination: Cross-Border Travelling for Donor Semen Due to Different Regulations.” In Artificial Insemination: An Update, edited by Willem Ombelet and Herman Tournaye, Facts, Views Vision in ObGyn Monograph (Wetteren: Universa Press), 55-60. Perler, Laura. 2022. Selektioniertes Leben: Einefeministische Perspektive auf die Eizellenspende. Münster: Edition Assemblage. Perler, Laura, and Carolin Schurr. 2021. “Intimate Lives in the Global Bioeconomy: Reproductive Biographies of Mexican Egg Donors.” Body Society 27 (3): 3-27. Persson, Emil. 2015. “Banning ‘Homosexual Propaganda’: Belonging and Visibility in Contemporary Russian Media.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 256-74. Petropanagos, Angel. 2017. “Pronatalism, Geneticism, and ART.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1): 119-47. Petrov, Ivan. 2020. “Materinskaya plata: SKR rasslefuyet smerf rebyonka surrogatnoj materi. Kak ustroyen biznes po prodazhe rozhdyennykh v Rossi։ detey inostrantsam.” Izvestia, January 16. https://iz.ru/964655/ivanpetrov/ materinskaia-plata-skr-rassleduet-smert-rebenka-surrogatnoi-materi. Pfeffer, Naomi. 2011. “Eggs-Ploiting Women: A Critical Feminist Analysis of the Different Principles in Transplant and Fertility Tourism.” In “Symposium: Cross-Border Reproductive Care—Ethical, Legal, and Socio-Cultural Perspectives,” special issue, Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 634-41. Phillips,
Anne. 2013. “Does the Body Make a Difference?” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 143-56. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ploeg, Irma van der. 2001. Prosthetic Bodies: The Construction of the Fetus and the Couple as Patients in Reproductive Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Rabinów, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. 2006. “Biopower Today.” BioSocieties 1 (2): 195-217. Rachman, Gideon. 2022. “Understanding Vladimir Putin, the Man Who Fooled the World.” The Guardian, April 9. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ apr/09/understanding-vladimir-putin-the-man-who-fooled-the-world. Radaev, Vadim. 2004. “How Trust Is Established in Economic Relationships When Institutions and Individuals Are Not Trustworthy: The Case of Russia.” In Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition, edited by János Komai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, 91-110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Radin, Margaret Jane. 1987. “Market-Inalienability.” Harvard Law Review 100 (8): 1849-1937. ------. 2005. “Contested Commodities.” In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, edited by Martha Μ. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, 81-95. New York: New York University Press. Radkowska-Walkowicz, Magdalena. 2012. “The Creation of‘Monsters’: The Discourse of Opposition to in Vitro Fertilization in Poland.” Reproductive Health Matters 20 (40): 30-37. Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder: Westview Press. ------ . 1996. “Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers and Fathers.”
American Ethnologist 23 (2): 352-65. RAHR (Russian Association of Human Reproduction). 2016. Registr VRT: Yubileynyj 20j Ochyotza 2014 God. https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/registr_BRT_ RARCH16.pdf.
272 REFERENCES ------. 2017. Registr VRT: Ochyot za 2015 God. https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/ RegistrVRT_2015 .pdf. ------. 2021. Registr VRT: Ochyot za 2019 God. http://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/ RegistrART2019.pdf. Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge. Readings, Jennifer, Lucy Blake, Polly Casey, Vasanti Jadva, and Susan Golombok. 2011. “Secrecy, Disclosure and Everything in-between: Decisions of Parents of Children Conceived by Donor Insemination, Egg Donation and Surrogacy.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 22 (5): 485-95. Rehsmann, Julia. 2018. “Exciting Waiting: Exploring Liver Transplantation in Germany.” Medicine Anthropology Theory 5 (1). http.7/www.medanthrotheory. org/article/view/5373. Reiter, Svetlana, and Kevin Rothrock. 2020. “The Invention of ‘Gay Mutilators.’ ” Meduza, October 5. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/05/ the֊invention-of-gay-mutilators. Remington, Thomas F. 2011. The Politics of Inequality in Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reuters. 2022. “Russia Moves to Bar Foreigners from Using Its Surrogate Mothers.” May 24. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-moves-barforeigners-using-its-surrogate-mothers-2022-05-24/. RIA Novosti. 2013. “Surrogatnoe materinstvo.” October 7. https://ria. ru/20131007/968214798.html. Richard, Analiese, and Daromir Rudnyckyj. 2009. “Economies of Affect.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (1): 57-77. Riggs, Damien W. 2016. “Narratives of Choice amongst White Australians Who Undertake Surrogacy
Arrangements in India.” Journal ofMedical Humanities 37 (3): 313-25. Riggs, Damien W., and Clare Bartholomaeus. 2016. “The Desire for a Child among a Sample of Heterosexual Australian Couples.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 34 (5): 442-50. ------. 2018. “‘It’s Just What You Do’: Australian Middle-Class Heterosexual Couples Negotiating Compulsory Parenthood.” Feminism Psychology 28 (3): 373-89. Riggs, Damien W., and Clemence Due. 2013. “Representations of Reproductive Citizenship and Vulnerability in Media Reports of Offshore Surrogacy.” Citizenship Studies 17 (8): 956-69. ------. 2017. “Constructions of Gay Men’s Reproductive Desires on Commercial Surrogacy Clinic Websites.” In Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction, edited by Miranda Davis, 33-45. London: Zed Books. Ritter, Martina. 2001. “Müttermacht im Patriarchat—Geschlechterverhältnisse ín Rußland.” In Zivilgesellschaft und Gender-Politik in Rußland, edited by Martina Ritter, 21-40. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag. Rivkin-Fish, Michele. 2003. “Anthropology, Demography, and the Search for a Critical Analysis of Fertility: Insights from Russia.” American Anthropologist 105 (2): 289-301. ------. 2004. “ ‘Change Yourself and the Whole World Will Become Kinder’: Russian Activists for Reproductive Health and the Limits of Claims Making for Women.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18 (3): 281-304.
REFERENCES 273 ------. 2005. Women’s Health in Post-Soviet Russia: The Politics ofIntervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ------. 2009. “Tracing Landscapes of the Past in Class Subjectivity: Practices of Memory and Distinction in Marketizing Russia.” American Ethnologist 36 (1): 79-95. ------. 2010. “Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of‘Maternity Capital.”’ Slavic Review 69 (3): 701-24. ------. 2011. “Learning the Moral Economy of Commodified Health Care: ‘Community Education,’ Failed Consumers, and the Shaping of Ethical Clinician-Citizens.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 35 (2): 183-208. ------. 2013. “Conceptualizing Feminist Strategies for Russian Reproductive Politics: Abortion, Surrogate Motherhood, and Family Support after Socialism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3): 569-93. ------. 2018. “‘Fight Abortion, Not Women’: The Moral Economy Underlying Russian Feminist Advocacy.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 27 (2): 22-44. Rivkin-Fish, Michele, and Cassandra Hartblay. 2014. “When Global LGBTQ Advocacy Became Entangled with New Cold War Sentiment: A Call for Examining Russian Queer Experience.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 21 (1): 95-111. Roache, Madeline. 2018. “Ukraine’s ‘Baby Factories’: The Human Cost of Surrogacy.” AI Jazeera, September 13. https://www.aljazeera.eom/features/2018/9/13/ ukraines-baby-factories-the-human-cost-of-surrogacy. Robben, Antonius C. G. Μ. 2012. “The Politics of Truth and Emotion among Victims and Perpetrators of
Violence.” In Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader, edited by Antonius C. G. Μ. Robben and Jeffrey A. Sluka, 175-90. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Roberts, Celia. 2007. Messengers of Sex: Hormones, Biomedicine, and Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roberts, Elizabeth. 2006. “God’s Laboratory: Religious Rationalities and Modernity in Ecuadorian in Vitro Fertilization.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30 (4): 507-36. ROC (Russian Orthodox Church). 2000. The Basis of the Social Concept. https://old. mospat.ru/en/documents/social-concepts/ . Rogoża, Jadwiga. 2021. “The Pandemic Takes Its Toll: Russia’s Demographic Crisis.” OSW Centre for Eastern Studies, February 16. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2021-02-16/ pandemic-takes-its-toll-russias-demographic-crisis. Rose, Nikolas. 2004. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Roth, Andrew. 2020. “Up to 1,000 Babies Born to Surrogate Mothers Stranded in Russia.” The Guardian, July 29. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2020/ jul/29/up-to-lOOO-babies-born-to-surrogate-mothers-stranded-in-russia. Rotkirch, Anna, Anna Temkina, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2007. “Who Helps the Degraded Housewife? Comments on Vladimir Putin’s Demographic Speech.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (4): 349-57. Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2010. “Making India the ‘Mother Destination’: Outsourcing Labor to Indian Surrogates.” In
Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace, edited b’ Christine L. Williams and Kirsten Dellinger, 253-85. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
274 REFERENCES ------ . 2014. “Conceiving Fatherhood: Gay Men and Indian Surrogate Mothers.” In Globalized Fatherhood, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn, Wendy Chavkin, and JoséAlberto Navarro, 291-311. New York: Berghahn Books. ------ . 2016a. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press. ------ . 2016b. “Why India’s New Surrogacy Bill Is Bad for Women.” Huffington Post, August 26. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-indias-new-surrogacy-bill-isbad-for-women_b_57c075f9e4b0b01630de83ad. ------ . 2018. “Reproducing Dystopia: The Politics of Transnational Surrogacy in India, 2002-2015.” Critical Sociology 44 (7-8): 1087-1101. Rudrappa, Sharmila, and Caitlyn Collins. 2015. “Altruistic Agencies and Compassionate Consumers: Moral Framing of Transnational Surrogacy.” Gender Society 29 (6): 937-59. Salmenniemi, Suvi, and Maria Adamson. 2015. “New Heroines of Labour: Domesticating Post-Feminism and Neoliberal Capitalism in Russia.” Sociology 49 (1): 88-105. Sandel, Michael. 2009. Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ------ . 2013. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin Books. Sandelowski, Margarete. 1991. “Compelled to Try: The Never-·Enough Quality of Conceptive Technology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 5 (1): 29-47. Sandelowski, Margarete, and Sheryl De Lacey. 2002. “The Uses of a ‘Disease’: Infertility as Rhetorical Vehicle.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van
Balen, 33-51. Berkeley: University of California Press. Sanger, Eva. 2020. Elternwerden zwischen “Babyfernsehen” und medizinischer Überwachung: Eine Ethnografie pränataler Ultraschalluntersuchungen. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1985. “Culture, Scarcity, and Maternal Thinking: Maternal Detachment and Infant Survival in a Brazilian Shantytown.” Ethos 13 (4): 291-317. Schultz, Susanne. 2015. “Reproducing the Nation: The New German Population Policy and the Concept of Demographization.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (3): 337-61. Schurr, Carolin. 2017. “From Biopolitics to Bioeconomies: The ART of (Re-)Producing White Futures in Mexico’s Surrogacy Market.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (2): 241-62. ------ . 2019. “Multiple Mobilities in Mexico’s Fertility Industry.” Mobilities 14 (1): 103-19. Schurr, Carolin, and Elisabeth Militz. 2018. “The Affective Economy of Transnational Surrogacy.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (8): 1626-45. Schwirtz, Michael, Maria Varenikova, and Rick Gladstone. 2022. “Putin Calls Ukrainian Statehood a Fiction: History Suggests Otherwise.” New York Times, February 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/world/europe/putinukraine.html. Shalev, Carmel. 1989. Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Sharp, Lesley A. 2000. “The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 29 (1): 287-328.
REFERENCES 275 Shchurko, Tatsiana. 2017. “Women’s Health—Nation’s Health: The Policies of Reproduction in Post-Soviet Belarus.” In Gender Panic, Gender Policy, edited by Vasilikie Demos and Marcia Texler Segal, 24:45-66. Advances in Gender Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. Shenfield, F., J. de Mouzon, Guido Pennings, A. P. Ferraretti, A. Nyboe Andersen, G. de Wert, V. Goossens, and ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care. 2010. “Cross Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries.” Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1361-68. Siegl, Veronika. 2015. “Märkte der guten Hoffnung.” PROKLA: Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 45 (178): 99-115. https://www.prokla.de/index.php/ PROKLA/article/view/231. ------. 2018a. “Aligning the Affective Body: Commercial Surrogacy in Moscow and the Emotional Labour of‘Nastraivatsya.’” Tsantsa: Journal of the Swiss Anthropological Association 23: 63-72. ------. 2018b. “The Ultimate Argument: Evoking the Affective Powers of‘Happiness’ in Commercial Surrogacy.” Anthropological Journal ofEuropean Cultures 27 (2): 1-21. ------. 2018c. “Zehn Monate I Ten Months.” In hope, edited by Sarah Hildebrand, 41-63. Basel: Christoph Merian Verlag, https://www.merianverlag.ch/produkt/ fotografíe/hope/b79ed4db-c980-4e41-b450-el3b75244e8e.html. ------. 2019. “There’s a Crack in Everything. Or: How Leonard Cohen Inspired My Research on Commercial Surrogacy.” Medicine Anthropology Theory 6(1). http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5371/7356. ------. 2022. “Die ‘Leihmütter’ der Ukraine: Wer bestimmt über den schwangeren Körper?” GeN-
ethisches Netzwerk, March 22. https://gen-ethisches-netzwerk.de/ maerz-2022/die-leihmuetter-der-ukraine. Siegl, Veronika, Carolin Schurr, Laura Perler, Christine Bigler, and Tina Büchler. 2022. “Transnationale reproduktive Mobilität - empirische Befunde zu einer umstrittenen Praxis.” URPP Human Reproduction Reloaded, Working Paper 3. Zürich: Seismo, https://doi.org/10.33058/wpuzh.2022.8865. Simoni, Valerio. 2016. “Economization, Moralization, and the Changing Moral Economies of‘Capitalism’ and ‘Communism’ among Cuban Migrants in Spain.” Anthropological Theory 16 (4): 454-75. Śmietana, Marcin. 2017a. “‘Families Like We’d Always Known’? Spanish Gay Fathers’ Normalization Narratives in Transnational Surrogacy.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 49-60. New York: Routledge. ------. 2017b. “Affective De-Commodifying, Economic De-Kinning: Surrogates’ and Gay Fathers’ Narratives in U.S. Surrogacy.” Sociological Research Online 22 (2): 163-75. ------ . 2018. “Procreative Consciousness in a Global Market: Gay Men’s Paths to Surrogacy in the USA.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 7:101-11. Śmietana, Marcin, Sharmila Rudrappa, and Christina Weis. 2021. “Moral Frameworks of Commercial Surrogacy within the US, India and Russia.” Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 29 (1): 1-17. Smyth, Regina, and Irina Soboleva. 2014. “Looking beyond the Economy: Pussy Riot and the Kremlin’s Voting Coalition.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (4): 257-75. Soboleva, Irina V, and Yaroslav A.
Bakhmetjev. 2015. “Political Awareness and Self Blame in the Explanatory Narratives of LGBT People amid the Anti-LGBT Campaign in Russia.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 275-96.
276 REFERENCES Spar, Debora. 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. ------. 2010. “Free Markets, Free Choice? A Market Approach to Reproductive Rights.” In Baby Markets: Money and the New Politics of Creating Families, edited by Michele Goodwin, 177-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Speier, Amy. 2011. “Brokers, Consumers and the Internet: How North American Consumers Navigate Their Infertility Journeys.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 592-99. ------. 2016. Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press. Speier, Amy, Kristin Lozański, and Susan Frohlick. 2020. “Reproductive Mobilities.” Mobilities 15 (2): 107-19. Sputnik. 2013. “Most Russians Say Surrogate Motherhood Acceptable - Survey.” December 19. https://sputniknews.com/20131219/Most-Russians-SaySurrogate-Motherhood-Acceptable-Survey-185736619.html . Starza-Allen, Antony. 2016. “Council of Europe Rejects Surrogacy Guidelines.” BioNews (blog), October 18. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95737. Strasser, Sabine, and Luisa Piart. 2018. “Intimate Uncertainties.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 27 (2): v-xv. Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------. 1992b. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Stuvøy, Ingvill. 2018. “Accounting for the Money-Made Parenthood of
Transnational Surrogacy.” Anthropology Medicine 25 (3): 280-95. Sudakov, Dmitry. 2011a. “Market of Surrogate Motherhood Grows Like a Weed.” Pravda, January 20. https://english.pravda.ru/ society/116585 -surrogate_motherhood/. ------ . 201 lb. “Surrogacy: A Form of Female Slavery?” Pravda, December 1. https:// english.pravda.ru/society/119805-surrogate_motherhood/. Svitnev, Konstantin. 2006. “The Right to Life (ART, Surrogate Motherhood and Demographics).” The Scientific Expert Magazine 1: n.p. ------ . 2007. ART Regulations in Russia and Elsewhere, http://www.jurconsult.ru/en/ publications/art_regulations_in_russia_and_elsewhere/. Accessed July 3,2014 (no longer available). ------ . 2012. “New Russian Legislation on Assisted Reproduction.” Open Access Scientific Reports 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.207. ------. 2016. “Gestational Surrogacy in the Russian Federation.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, edited by E. Scott Sills, 232-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Swader, Christopher S. 2013. The Capitalist Personality: Face-to-Face Sociality and Economic Change in the Post-Communist World. New York: Routledge. Swader, Christopher S., and Vaida Obelene. 2015. “Post-Soviet Intimacies: An Introduction.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 245-55. Swader, Christopher S., Olga Strelkova, Alena Sutormina, Viktoria Syomina, Volha Vysotskaya, and Irene Fedorova. 2013. “Love as a Fictitious Commodity: Giftfor-Sex Barters as Contractual Carriers of Intimacy.” Sexuality Culture 17 (4): 598-616. Swader,
Christopher S., and Irina D. Vorobeva. 2015. “Receiving Gifts for Sex in Moscow, Kyiv, and Minsk: A Compensated Dating Survey.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 321-48.
REFERENCES 277 Tarabrin, Roman. 2020. “Orthodox Perspectives on in Vitro Fertilization in Russia.” Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality 26 (2): 177-204. TASS. 2020. “Key Suspect in Russian Baby Trafficking Case Put on Wanted List.” July 19. https://tass.com/emergencies/1180171. ----- . 2021. “Russia to Grant Citizenship to Children Born through Surrogacy for Foreigners—Bill.” June 11. https://tass.com/society/1301807. ----- . 2022. “Decision Taken on Denazification, Demilitarization of Ukraine—Putin.” February 23. https://tass.com/politics/1409189. Teman, Elly. 2003. “The Medicalization of‘Nature’ in the ‘Artificial Body’: Surrogate Motherhood in Israel.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (1): 78-98. ----- . 2008. “The Social Construction of Surrogacy Research: An Anthropological Critique of the Psychosocial Scholarship on Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Science Medicine 67 (7): 1104-12. ----- . 2009. “Embodying Surrogate Motherhood: Pregnancy as a Dyadic BodyProject.” Body Society 15 (3): 47-69. ----- . 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley: University of California Press. ----- . 2019. “The Power of the Single Story: Surrogacy and Social Media in Israel.” Medical Anthropology 38 (3): 282-94. Teman, Elly, and Zsuzsa Berend. 2018. “Surrogate Non-Motherhood: Israeli and US Surrogates Speak about Kinship and Parenthood.” Anthropology Medicine 25 (3): 296-310. ----- . 2021. “Surrogacy as a Family Project: How Surrogates Articulate Familial Identity and Belonging.” Journal of Family Issues 42 (6): 1143-65. Temkina,
Anna. 2010. “Childbearing and Work-Family Balance among Contemporary Russian Women.” Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 45: 83-101. Temkina, Anna, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2015. “The Sexual Scripts and Identity of Middle-Class Russian Women.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 297-320. ----- . 2018. “Responsible Motherhood, Practices of Reproductive Choice and Class Construction in Contemporary Russia.” In Gender and Choice after Socialism, edited by Lynne Attwood, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova, 161-86. Cham: Springer International. Teschlade, Julia. 2019. “‘Wenn das liebe Geld nicht wär’: Zur Konstruktion von Intimität zwischen Tragemüttern und gleichgeschlechtlichen Männerpaaren.” Feministische Studien 37 (1): 65-81. Teschlade, Julia, and Almut Peukert. 2019. “Creating a Family through Surrogacy: Negotiating Parental Positions, Familial Boundaries and Kinship Practices.” GENDER: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft lì (2): 56-70. Tétrault-Farber, Gabrielle. 2014. “Russian Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Commercial Surrogate Motherhood.” Moscow Times, April 24. http://www.themoscowtimes. com/2014/04/24/russian-lawmaker-proposes-ban-on-commerciaI-surrogatemotherhood-a34637. Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Thompson, Edward P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past Present 50: 76-136. Tickle, Jonny. 2020a. “Reproduce or Pay Up! Controversial Russian Communist Politician Backs Childlessness Tax on Citizens Who
Don’t Want to Have Kids.” Russia Today, October 14. https://www.rt.com/ russia/503490-childnessness-payment-tax-russia/.
278 REFERENCES ------. 2020b. “Russian MP Zhirinovsky Suggests Government Offer Money to Discourage Women from Abortion, to Help Alleviate Demographic Crisis.” Russia Today, December 24. https://www.rt.com/russia/510618-zhirinovskymoney-discourage-abortion/. Ticktin, Miriam. 2013. “The Waiting Room.” Somatosphere (blog), October 28. http:// somatosphere.net/2013/the-waiting-room.html/. Tkach, Olga. 2009. “Making Family and Unmaking Kin in the Russian Media: Reproductive Technologies and Relatedness.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 135-57. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Tober, Diane. 2018. Romancing the Sperm. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Tober, Diane, and Charlotte Halmø Kroløkke. 2021. “Emotion, Embodiment, and Reproductive Colonialism in the Global Human Egg Trade.” Gender, Work Organization 28 (5): 1766-86. Toledano, Sarah Jane, and Kristin Zeiler. 2017. “Hosting the Others’ Child? Relational Work and Embodied Responsibility in Altruistic Surrogate Motherhood.” Feminist Theory 18 (2): 159-75. Torocheshnikova, Maryana. 2021. “‘Torgovlya deťmi’ и ‘delo reproduktologov.’” Radio Svoboda, July 15. https://www.svoboda.Org/a/31360422.html. Tronto, Joan C. 1994. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. London: Routledge. Tronto, Joan, and Berenice Fischer. 1990. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson, 36-54. Albany: State
University of New York Press. Trubina, Elena. 2012. “Class Differences and Social Mobility amongst CollegeEducated Young People in Russia.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 203-20. Farnham: Ashgate. Tsing, Anna. 2013. “Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 21-43. Tuller, David. 1996. Cracks in the Iron Closet: Travels in Gay Lesbian Russia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Turbine, Vikki, and Kathleen Riach. 2012. “The Right to Choose or Choosing What’s Right? Women’s Conceptualizations of Work and Life Choices in Contemporary Russia.” Gender, Work Organization 19 (2): 165-87. Twine, France Winddance. 2011. Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. New York: Routledge. United Nations, OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights). 1989. “Convention on the Rights of the Child.” November 20. https://www.ohchr.org/ en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Utrata, Jennifer. 2015. Women without Men: Single Mothers and Family Change in the New Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Vaughn, Richard. 2020. “Is Sperm Donor Anonymity a Thing of the Past?” International Fertility Law Group (blog), October 30. https://www.iflg.net/ is-sperm-donor-anonymity-a-thing-of-the-past/. Verdery, Katherine. 2013. “From Parent-State to Family Patriarchs: Gender and Nation in Contemporary Eastern Europe.” In Eastern Europe: Women in Transition, edited by Irena Grudzinska-Gross and Andrzej W. Tymowski, 15-44. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang
Verlag.
REFERENCES 279 Vertommen, Sigrid. 2016. “Babies from Behind Bars: Stratified Assisted Reproduction in Palestine/Israel.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 207-18. New York: Routledge. Vertommen, Sigrid, and Camille Barbagallo. 2021. “The In/Visible Wombs of the Market: The Dialectics of Waged and Unwaged Reproductive Labour in the Global Surrogacy Industry.” Review of International Political Economy, January, 1-41. Vitebsky, Piers. 1993. “Is Death the Same Everywhere? Contexts of Knowing and Doubting.” In An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, edited by Mark Hobart, 100-115. London: Routledge. Vlasenko, Polina. 2014. “Governing through Precarity: The Experience of Infertile Bodies in IVF Treatment in Ukraine.” Journal of Social Policy Studies 12 (3): 441-54. ------ . 2015. “Desirable Bodies/Precarious Laborers: Ukrainian Egg Donors in Context of Transnational Fertility.” In (In)Fertile Citizens: Anthropological and Legal Challenges ofAssisted Reproduction Technologies, edited by Venetia Kantsa, Giulia Zanini, and Lina Papadopoulou, 197-216. Athens: (In)FERCIT. ------ . 2020. “Ukraine’s Surrogate Mothers Struggle under Quarantine.” OpenDemocracy, June 10. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/ ukraines-surrogate-mothers-struggle-under-quarantine/. ------ . 2021. “Global Circuits of Fertility: The Political Economy of the Ukrainian Ova Market.” PhD thesis, Indiana University. Vora, Kalindi. 2009. “Indian Transnational Surrogacy and
the Commodification of Vital Energy.” Subjectivity 28 (1): 266-78. ------ . 2013. “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy.” Current Anthropology 54 (S7): S97-106. Vora, Kalindi, and Malathi Michelle Iyengar. 2017. “Citizen, Subject, Property: Indian Surrogacy and the Global Fertility Market.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 25-35. New York: Routledge. Walker, Charles. 2012. “Re-inventing Themselves? Gender, Employment and Subjective Well-being amongst Young Working-Class Russians.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 221-40. Farnham: Ashgate. Waldby, Catherine, and Melinda Cooper. 2008. “The Biopolitics of Reproduction: Post-Fordist Biotechnology and Women’s Clinical Labour.” Australian Feminist Studies 23 (55): 57-73. Weis, Christina. 2015. “Workers or Mothers? The Business of Surrogacy in Russia.” Open Democracy, December 15. https://www.opendemocracy.net/ beyondslavery/christina-weis/workers-or-mothers-business-of-surrogacy-inrussia. ------ . 2021a. Surrogacy in Russia: An Ethnography of Reproductive Labour, Stratification and Migration. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. ------ . 2021b. “Changing Fertility Landscapes: Exploring the Reproductive Routes and Choices of Fertility Patients from China for Assisted Reproduction in Russia.” Asian Bioethics Review 13(1): 7-22. Weis, Christina, and Maria Kirpichenko. 2022. “The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Russian Fertility Industry.” BioNews (blog), April
4. https://www.bionews. org.uk/page_163451. Whittaker, Andrea. 2019. International Surrogacy as Disruptive Industry in Southeast Asia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
280 REFERENCES Wichterich, Christa. 2018. “Transnational Reconfigurations of Re/Production and the Female Body: Bioeconomics, Motherhoods and the Case of Surrogacy in India.” In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care, edited by Chiristine Bauhardt and Wendy Harcourt, 211-29. New York: Routledge. Widdows, Heather. 2013. “Rejecting the Choice Paradigm: Ethical Framework of Prostitution and Egg Sale.” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 157-80. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Williams, Joan C., and Viviana A. Zelizer. 2005. “To Commodify or Not to Commodify: That Is Not the Question.” In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, edited by Martha Μ. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, 362-82. New York: New York University Press. Wilson, Kalpana. 2008. “Reclaiming Agency, Reasserting Resistance.” IDS Bulletin 39 (6): 83-91. ------ . 2013. “Agency as ‘Smart Economics’: Neoliberalism, Gender and Development.” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 84-101. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. Yasakova, Ekaterina. 2021. “Nye primut u chastnykh: Surrogatnow materinstvo predlozhili perevesti v goskliniki.” Izvestia, August 16. https://iz.ru/1207641/ ekaterina-iasakova/ne-primut-u-chastnykh-surrogatnoe-materinstvo predlozhili-perevesti-v-goskliniki. Yurchak, Alexei. 2003. “Russian Neoliberal: The Entrepreneurial Ethic and the Spirit of ‘True Careerism.’” Russian Review 62 (1): 72-90. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publishing. Zatari, Amalia. 2020. “‘My dazhe nye znaem, zhiv li on’: SKR zayel delo o torgovle dyeťmi, ikh roditeli prosyat pomoshch u Putina.” BBC, October 9. https://www. bbc.com/russian/features-54468421 . Zelizer, Viviana A. 2013. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zhurzhenko, Tatiana. 2012. “Mothering the Nation: Demographic Politics, Gender and Parenting in Ukraine.” In Gendering Post-Socialist Transition: Studies ofChanging Gender Perspectives, edited by Krassimira Daskalova, Caroline Hornstein Tomic, Karl Kaser, and Filip Radunović, 285-302. Vienna: LIT Verlag. Ziff, Elizabeth. 2017. “‘The Mommy Deployment’: Military Spouses and Surrogacy in the United States.” Sociological Forum 32 (2): 406-25. ------ . 2019. “‘Honey, I Want to Be a Surrogate’: How Military Spouses Negotiate and Navigate Surrogacy with Their Service Member Husbands.” Journal of Family Issues 40 (18): 2774-2800. ------ . 2020. “Surrogacy and Medicalization: Navigating Power, Control, and Autonomy in Embodied Labor.” Sociological Quarterly 62 (3): 510-27. Zigon, Jarrett. 2009. “Developing the Moral Person: The Concepts of Human, Godmanhood, and Feelings in Some Russian Articulations of Morality.” Anthropology of Consciousness 20 (1): 1-26. ------. 2011. “A Moral and Ethical Assemblage in Russian Orthodox Drug Rehabilitation.” Ethos 39 (1): 30-50.
Index abortion as alleged reason for infertility, 35, 79 bodily autonomy and, 193,196 compensation and, 106-107 opposition to, 40,189 screening process and, 86 adoption, 40-42,179,202,230 advertising, 95-97,99,171 affect aliens, 143 affect/emotions hormones and maternal instinct and, 143, 149-155 individualization and, 160-161 affective de-commodification, 166,191 affective labor, 168-169,171,174-175, 185-186,191 affective understanding, 222 agencies as protection, 123-128 see also individual agencies agents, interviews with, 25 Ahmed, Sara, 143,167-168,187 Albania, 238 Aleksandra Denisovna, 76-77,114-115, 183 alienation, 134 alignment, technologies of, 136-161 alimony, 92 Alisa Serafimovna, 34,41,44-47,53,56, 70-71, 74,79,128-130 Altra Vita IVF Clinic, 19-25,83-85, 104, 106-109,144 altruism, 113,130,166,177,180,183-184 Alyona Timofeyevna, 66,182-183,201, 203-211,213-215,221 Amapola, 173-174,188 American Society of Reproductive Medicine, 252nll Anastasia Anatolyevna, 118,126,159 anonymity, 31,69,72,85,128,133-134,220, 231-232 “Anthem” (Cohen), 217 antipolitics machine, 160 Anton Feodorovich, 75-77,117 anxiety about pregnancy outcomes, 105-106 Arendt, Hannah, 15-16 Ashwin, Sarah, 37 assisted reproductive technologies (ART) agencies and, 32 development of, 5,12 disinformation regarding children born via, 60-62,64 overview of research on, 7-9 public discourse on, 5 attachment emotional articulation and, 157-158 lack of, 143 Baby Gammy, 6-7,225 Baby Μ case, 194-195 Bakhmetjev, Yaroslav, 69 ban, call for, 198-199 Baranov, Alexander, 61 Basis of the Social Concept, The (ROC),
35,60 Becker, Gay, 76 Bell, Kirsten, 218 bellies, strap-on, 56,70-71 Belyakov, Anton, 60 Berend, Zsuzsa, 9 Bharadwaj, Aditya, 103 biopolitical turn, 17,57, 59,63-64 biopower, 32,53 BioTexCom, 171-175,224-227,232,236-239, 249Ո10 birth rates, 38-40 blackmail, 121,125 Blanco, Sara, 170,179-180,182 body maps, 145 bonding, between surrogate and child, 136-137,143-144 Bourdieu, Pierre, 201 Cabello, Alberto, 169-170, 190 Cambodia, 7 capitalism, 54,180, 189-199 capriciousness, 122-124 care, ethics of, 57-58, 79-80 281
282 INDEX caring communities, 187 Catholic Church, 57,62 Center of Medical Statistics, Ministry of Health (Ukraine), 249n9 chance, element of, 101-102 child trafficking, allegations of, 14,225, 228-229,237-238 China/Chinese parents, 225,227-228,236 choreographing surrogacy, 83-111 class, 52-54,170 coercion critique, 6,191 Cohen, Lawrence, 197 Cohen, Leonard, 217 Collins, Caitlyn, 9,198 commissions, 100 commodities, gifts versus, 134 compensated dating, 94-96 constructing phrases, 74 contact, restriction of, 125-128,146 contracts, 13,86,106-107, 111, 132,208-209 Cooper, Melinda, 117 Corea, Gena, 6 corruption critique, 6,191 cosmopolitanism, 63 costs of surrogacy, 11-12,52, 96,100-101, 180-181 Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 209 couvade-like practices, 78 COVID-19 pandemic, 224,228,236,251n7 cravings, 122-123 “crystal vase” metaphor, 84,101,105,107,110 C-sections, 206-207 “culturedness,” 65 cutting ties, 134-135 Cyprus, 238 Czech Republic, 203 deep acting, 168 delegitimization of critique, 222 deliveries, 149-150,153-154, 160 Delmonte, Ricardo, 124,185, 187 demographic crisis, discourse of, 32, 36-40, 51,54 Deomampo, Daisy, 106 dependency, mutual, 219 detachment, 113-114,143-144 Diliara Eduardovna, 120-121 Dima Yakovlev Law, 229-230 Dimitri Anatolyevich, 35-36,43,63, 71 Dina Antonovna, 34,48,52,65,68-70 direct arrangements, 24-25,95, 127-129, 132, 147-148,158 disclosure to children, 74-76,80 discrimination, 73-74,92,189,211-212 “dis-emotionalizing,” 160 diversity among surrogates, 21-22 divorce due to infertility, 34 doctors, interviews with, 25.
see ako individual doctors Donbass republics, 235 donor conception, 41 double bind, 198-201 dyadic body-project, 78 “echo chambers,” 186 economic imbalance/inequality, 4-5,54,92 economies of affect, 168 egg providers, 90,100,104,200 embodied labor, 119 embryo donations, 226 embryo transfers, 86-87,101 emotional entanglements, prevention of, 133 emotional labor, 137-143,145,158-159, 168 emptiness, feelings of, 149-150,152,155-156, 160 Ertman, Martha, 192 Essig, Laurie, 69 ethical labor, 3,10, 15-16,57-58 ethics, 15 ethnography, definition of, 23 ethnonationalism, 39,51,54 European Council, 7,223 European Court of Human Rights, 129 European Parliament, 223 experience, benefits and disadvantages of, 121 exploitation, 95-96,165-166,170,191,195, 212,214 Facebook, 186 Family Code of the Russian Federation, 13,120 Family Code of Ukraine, 14 Fassin, Didier, 10 Federal Laws and Orders (Russia), 13 feeling rules, 137-138,159,168,218 feminist criticism, 6-7,193-196 Ferguson, James, 160 fertilization process, 86-87 fieldwork access difficulties, 16-20 clinic fieldwork, 84-88 definition of ethnography, 23 overview of research, 25 financial struggles, 52 FINRRAGE (Feminist Interventional Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering), 6 Firestone, Shulamith, 6
INDEX Fischer, Berenice, 79-80 Flatley, Jonathan, 144 Førde, Kristin Engh, 16 forgetting about surrogacy, 77-79 foster care, 202 Foucault, Michel, 15,32,53,137 fragmentation of “motherhood,” 5-6 fraud, 119-120 free choice, 166-167, 193-194,215-216 freedom, ambivalences of, 193-216 fridge metaphor, 116 Frolov v. Suzdaleva, 252nl Fuentes, Alvaro, 125, 185,187,199-201 Gal, Susan, 67 Galkin, Maksim, 58 Galya Yanovna, 33,41,47,52,64,66-67,70-71, 74,77-78,120,122,130 gay men/couples, 14,49-50,175-178,211-212, 228-230. see also LGBTQI+ community Gay Propaganda Law, 63-64,175,229 gender differences, 54 gender roles/norms, 36-38 gendered altruism, 166 gendered empowerment, 166,194 genetic links absence of, 129,139-140, 143 importance of, 41-42,44 intent and, 139-140 requirements involving, 13 genetics, fragmentation and, 5-6 Georgia, 227,238 gestational surrogacy, 5 gifts/gift metaphor, 134,197-198 Goffman, Erving, 168 Gorbachev, Mikhail, 38 grief, 157 group attitudes, 144 Guseva, Alya, 49,225-226 habitus, 201 happiness finding, 191-192 as human right, 187-191 narratives of, 166-167 promise of, 167-169,171 “happy objects,” 136 Hardt, Michael, 168 Hauser, David and Christoph, 175-179, 218-219 Heidegger, Martin, 144 Held, Virginia, 80 heroism, maternal, 44-48 Hildebrand, Sarah, 109 283 Hochschild, Arlie, 137,168 Hoeyer, Klaus, 209-210 Hogle, Linda F., 209-210 homophobia, 60 hope, 46,48 hormonal stimulation, 86-87, 104 hormones, risk and, 122,124 housing, 107-110 ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), 251n5 income inequality, 92 incubator metaphor, 116 indebtedness, feelings of,
133-134 indexical recalibration, 67-68 India comparison with, 5,140,144,161,174,220 costs of surrogacy in, 12 economic factors and, 197-199 economic motives and, 89 ethical work and, 16 exploitation and, 170,191 gay men/couples and, 7-8,175,254n3 housing in, 107 invisibility of surrogate and, 127,134-135 “mother-worker” and, 118 negative pregnancy outcomes and, 103,106, 157 neocolonialism and, 169 private agents and, 100 restrictions in, 226 infantilization, 123,131 infertility as disability, 31,53 divorce due to, 34 male, 43,251n5 as medical issue, 49-50,53 ROC on, 35-36 as self-inflicted, 35,79 as women’s problem, 43 infertility psychologists, interviews with, 25 informed consent, 209-210,214-216 Inhorn, Marcia, 43 insurance, 208-209 intended parents deliveries and, 153-154 direct arrangements and, 147-148 interviews with, 25 lack of contact with, 146-149,159 Russian invasion of Ukraine and, 236-238 see also individual parents intent, importance of, 139 Internet, role of, 24-25,69-70 interviews, overview of, 25-26 intimate economies, 195
284 INDEX intimate labor, definition of, 4 inviTRA International Fertility Fair, 1,24,169, 233 Isupova, Olga, 64-65,68 IVF, uncertainty and, 103 Katya Yefimovna, 21,42, 72,90-93,100, 108-110,123,138, 146-147,149-152, 155-156,158-161 Kauffert, Patricia, 53 Kay, Rebecca, 38 Kazakhstan, 227 Khvorostyanov, Natalia, 96 Kierans, Ciara, 218 Kirill, Patriarch, 59 Kirkorov, Philipp, 50-51,58 Kirpichenko, Maria, 184 Konstantin Pavlovich, 51,115-118,124-125, 128,156-158 Korolczuk, Elżbieta, 25ІПІ0 Korsak, Vladislav, 49 Kroløkke, Charlotte, 200 Kruglova, Anna, 74 Ksenia Demyanovna, 73,102-104 Laidlaw, James, 15 Lambek, Michael, 250nl5 Larissa Osipovna, 1-3,16,122,125-128, 133-134,161,222,233 lawyers, interviews with, 25. see also individual lawyers legislation adaptability and, 1-2 on disclosure, 75 gray areas in, 50 medical indication requirement and, 141 minimalistic, 188-189 proposals for, 226-227,230,232 in Russia and Ukraine, 11-15 see also regulation; individual laws legitimization, quests for, 47 Lena Mironovna, 21,72,79,89-90,93, 108-109, Ill, 115,132,138,146-147,149, 153-161,218-219 Levada Center, 58-59 Lewis, Sophie, 198 LGBTQI+ community, 69,229-230,254n6. see also gay men/couples lie detectors, 115 Lock, Margaret, 53 Lokshin, Vyacheslav, 49 Lustenberger, Sibylle, 135 Luzenko, Yuri, 225 lying, not telling versus, 67-68 Lyuba Dmitriyevna, 91,103,140-141,148-149 Makarychev, Andrey, 56-57 Maksim Antonov, 40-41,127 male infertility, 43,251n5 Malich, Lisa, 160 Marina Nikitichna, 139-140,143,145-146, 149,152 Marina Romanovna, 182-183, 206 Mariya Alexeyevna, 44,46,65-66 Markens,
Susan, 9,231 Martin, Emily, 117 Masha Arkadyevna, 99-100,105,120,124,132, 143-144,148,150-151,159 Masha Radionovna, 204-205,207-208 Maslennikova, Galina, 61 maternal rights legislation on, 120 payment tied to relinquishing, 13,106 Maternity Capital, 39 Matza, Tomas, 160-161 Mauss, Marcel, 134 Meddesk, 24, 56,95,131 media coverage, 9 mediated arrangements agencies’ role in, 123-124 direct versus, 24-25,95,158 Medvedev, Sergei, 56-57 men genetic links and, 42-44 lack of involvement of, 34,43 male infertility, 43,251n5 marital consent and, 141-142 single, 14,50-51,98,228-230 see also gay men/couples; individual men metaphorical thinking, 116-117,140 Mexico, 169-170,174,191,197 Mies, Maria, 6 Milonov, Vitaly, 60 “miracle stories,” 46-47 Mishtal, Joanna, 57 Mitra, Sayani, 157 Mizulina, Yelena, 60 modes of subjection, 137 Mohanty, Chandra, 195 monetary sanctions, 106-107 Monte, Pedro, 171,186 moods, 144 moral economy/economies, 10,24,26-27,94, 217,220
INDEX moral framings, 8-9 moral governance, 57,62,79 moral middle ground, 169-171, 175,193 mortality rates, 38 Mother-Heroines, 38 motherhood biopolitics of, 31-55 deserving, 47 importance of, 31-36 norm of, 32,40 pressures regarding, 33-34 state support for, 37-39 timing of, 33 “mother-worker,” 118-119 Motluk, Alison, 237 nanny metaphor, 140,143 Narotzky, Susana, 16 nastraivaťsya, 138-143 Natalya Nikolayevna, 112-113,117 Natasha Sergeyevna, 20,22,83-88,114, 122-123 nationalism, 36 naturalization of ART, 53-54 neoliberal discourses, 193 neoliberal subjects, 142 Nepal, 7,254n3 No Somos Vasijas (“We are not containers”), 7 Nordqvist, Petra, 75 Odnoklassniki, 95 Oksana Yevgenyevna, 71-72 Olessia Valeryevna, 31, 33-34,41-42,48, 52-53, 56,62,67-70, 73-74,76, 78-79, 121-122,129-130,135 Olga Georgyevna, 72, 144 online forums/platforms, 9,69-70,96,99 Oprah Winfrey Show, 198 Order of Maternal Glory (Russia), 38 Order of the Ministry of Health on Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Ukraine), 14 orphanages, 41-42 Ostrov Kenguru, 24,95 othering, 59-64 othering of surrogate child, 140-141 Pande, Amrita, 107,118-119,197,226 Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy, 129 Patel, Nayna, 198 Pático, Jennifer, 95 Pavel Viktorovich, 50-51 Payne, Gunnarsson, 251Ո10 285 Pérez, Marta, 126, 195, 197 “philanthrocapitalism,” 198 photographs, as evidence, 186-187 Poland, 57,62,251nl0 Polina Davidovna, 122-123 population decline, 38-39 postbirth narratives, 149-159 posthumous surrogacy, 12,58 poverty, exploitation and, 6,199-201 Power of Mothers, The, 232 practical realism, 92-93,104,146,215 pregnancies
anxiety about outcomes of, 105-106 element of chance in, 101-102 hiding, 71-73 simulated, 56,70-73, 77-78 visibility of, 70-73 “pregnant in the head,” 77-78 privacy, 17-18 private agents, 100 Probírka, 24,64,68-69, 95 “propaganda,” 63-64,76-77 psychological counseling, lack of, 157 psychological screening, 86,114-115 public opinion on surrogacy, 58-59 Pugacheva, Alla, 12,58 Pushkina, Oksana, 230 Pussy Riot, 59 Putin, Vladimir, 36-37, 39, 59,230,235,254n6 race, issues involving, 12 Radin, Margaret, 199 Ragoné, Helena, 139 Rapp, Rayna, 15 Raya Antonovna, 66,74,94-96,131,147-148, 160 reductions, 87,107 regime of truth, 27 regrets, 155-159,218 regulation lack of in Spain, 212-213 minimalistic, 188-189 see also legislation religion Catholic Church, 57, 62 uncertainty and, 103 see also Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) reproductive governance, 31-32,57 resemblance, as validating, 41 resistance, small acts of, 110-111 Riach, Kathleen, 93 “right understanding,” 3,117,143,221-222
286 INDEX Rita Tikhonovna, 33, 35,42, 52,66, 70,98-99, 102,130-132,147-148 Rivkin-Fish, Michele, 14,39,54,160-161 Robben, Antonius, 3 Roberts, Elizabeth, 32,103 Romania, 250nl Romero, Juan, 120,169-170,181-182,184,193, 196,211-212,216 Rose, Nikolas, 194 Rosjurconsulting, 227 Rudrappa, Sharmila, 9,15,127,134-135,187, 198 rules/guidelines during pregnancy, 84,105,107 Russian Association of Human Reproduction (RAHR), 12,16,49,230 Russian invasion of Ukraine, 235-239 Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) condemnation of surrogacy by, 71,73 criticism of, 230 growing influence of, 56 on infertility, 34-35,53 on motherhood, 36 political importance of, 17,32 push for surrogacy ban and, 60 Putin and, 59 role of, 79 Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), 58-59 salaries commissions from, 100 conversion rates for, xvi nationalities and, 100-101 terminations and, 106-107 timing of, 106-107 see also costs of surrogacy Sandel, Michael, 6 Schicktanz, Silke, 157 screening process, 86,114-115,199 secrecy, 5,17,25,56-80,113,161 selection criteria, surrogate, 13-14 selective reduction, 107 self technologies of, 137,168 work on, 142-143 self-commodification, 94,96 self-formation, 15 self-government, narratives of, 160 separate-spheres and hostile-worlds doctrine, 218 Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, 254n7 Sergej Petrovich, 49,53,118,127,157-158 sex selection, 189-190 Shalev, Carmel, 195 simulated pregnancies, 56, 70-73,77-78 single motherhood, 92-93 Smyth, Regina, 59 Soboleva, Irina, 59,69 Sokolova, Svetlana, 232 Sonya Vitalyevna, 88-89, 91, 93 Speier, Amy, 186 Stalin, Joseph,
38 Stop Surrogacy Now campaign, 7, 195,223 structural inequalities, 160-161 superstitions, 103 surrogacy costs of, 11-13,52,96,100-101,180-181 feminist positions toward, 6-7,193-196 forgetting about, 77-79 market, global, 1-2,8,16-170,224-227, 238-239 as medical solution, 48-50 number of children born through, 12,249n9, 249Ո10 public opinion on, 58-59 as work, 89,112-114,119,130,133-135,144, 220,232 Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill (India), 226 surrogates control of, 84,105,107,124-126 decisions to become, 94-101 description of perfect, 112 with experience, 121 first visits of, 85-86 “happy,” 182-187 inner alignment and, 138-143 interviews with, 87 invisibility of, 232,237 limited exchange among, 161 marital consent for, 141-142 motives of, 89-92,113,129-130,166,188, 196-197,199 questions from, 87-88 recruiting perfect, 114-119 riskiness and, 119-123 screening of, 86 see also individual surrogates surveillance, 108-109 Svitnev, Konstantin, 14, 51-52,54,189-190, 221,227-228 Swader, Christopher, 94-96 switch metaphor, 139,145,156,158-159 Tatyana Vasilyevna, 36,43,60-61,63-64,71, 136,140 Teman, Elly, 5,9,41,78,137,143,145,158 Temkina, Anna, 94
INDEX terminations, 106-107. see also abortion Teschlade, Julia, 177 testimonials, 184 Thailand, 6-7,170,191,220,225 “Third World Women,” 195 Thompson, Charis, 43,53 Thompson, Edward P., 10 Ticktin, Miriam, 108 Tkach, Olga, 251n7 Tochilovsky, Albert, 226 Tolstoy, Pyotr, 60,227,229 Torres, Diego, 180-181,195-197,212-213,216 transnational surrogacy arrangements, 6-8, 123-124,165-167,191 travelling donors, 104 Trisomy 21,6-7 Tronto, Joan, 79-80 trust, lack of, 18-19,64-66,128,130 truth fragile, 218-221 regimes of, 221-224 truth claims, 10-11 truth discourses, 57 truthfulness, 67-68 Tsing,Anna, 134 Tuller, David, 69 Turbine, Vikki, 93 Ukrainian Association for Reproductive Medicine (UARM), 226 uncertainty dealing with, 101-104 managing, 110-111 unenforceability of contracts, 13 United Russia, 59,227,230 287 United States, 169-171,177-179, 191,197,212, 220,254n7 Utrata, Jennifer, 40,92-93 Valeriy Ivanovich, 189,192 Venera Igorevna, 175-179 Vera Romanovna, 43,52,66,68,103,123 victim discourse, 127 visibility of pregnancies, 70-73 VittoriaVita, 184 Vkontakte, 95,155 Vlasenko, Polina, 33 Vora, Kalindi, 197 Vorobeva, Irina, 94-96 Wagner, Stefan and Teresa, 120,170,182-183, 201-211,213-214,216,221 Waldby, Catherine, 117 Weis, Christina, 22 “what if” sensibility, 74 Whittaker, Andrea, 10 Williams, Joan, 7 win-win argument, 196-197,201 World Health Organization, 209 Yakovenko, Sergej, 19-20,22-23 Yana Timurovna, 141,145 Yeshua-Katz, Daphna, 96 Yurchak, Alexei, 142 Yushchenko, Viktor, 37 Zdravomyslova, Elena, 94 Zelizer, Viviana, 7,218 Zhenya Pavlovna, 88-91, 100-102, 138-141 Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek München v — J
|
| adam_txt |
Contents Acknowledgments Preliminary Notes Introduction ix xiii 1 Part I 1. The Biopolitics of Motherhood 31 2. Secret Conceptions 56 3. Choreographing Surrogacy 83 Part II 4. Doing It Business-Style 112 5. Technologies of Alignment 136 6. Laboring with Happiness 165 7. Ambivalences of Freedom 193 Conclusion 217 Afterword: Surrogacy in Times of War 235 Appendix: Research Participants Notes References Index 241 249 257 281 Part III
References Abé, Nicola. 2022. “Bleiben Sie ruhig: Das Lebens Ihres Kindes hängt davon ab.” Der Spiegel, March 19. https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/leihmutterschaft-in-derukraine-ein-bunker-voller-babys-a-4a514c55-097a-4818-b379-98e5a82c7a67. Adrian, Stine Willum, and Charlotte Kroløkke. 2018. “Passport to Parenthood: Reproductive Pathways in and out of Denmark.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (2): 112-28. Agustin, Laura Maria. 2008. Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry. London: Zed Books. Ahmed, Sara. 2004a. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 22 (2): 117-39. ------ . 2004b. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ------ . 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. AI Jazeera. 2022. “UN: Over 5 Million People Have Fled Ukraine since Russia Invasion.” April 20. https://www.aljazeera.eom/news/2022/4/20/ more-than-5-million-ukrainians-have-fled-since-russian-invasion. Almeling, Rene. 2007. “Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material.” American Sociological Review 72 (3): 319-40. Anderson, John. 2016. “Religion, State and ‘Sovereign Democracy’ in Putin’s Russia.” Journal of Religious and Political Practice 2 (2): 249-66. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 3-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. Arvidsson, Anna, Sara Johnsdotter, and Birgitta Essén. 2015. “Views of Swedish Commissioning Parents Relating to the Exploitation Discourse in Using Transnational Surrogacy.” PLoS ONE 10 (5): e0126518. Ashwin, Sarah. 2000. “Introduction: Gender, State and Society in Soviet and PostSoviet Russia.” In Gender, State and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, edited by Sarah Ashwin, 1-29. London: Routledge. ------ . 2002. “The Influence of the Soviet Gender Order on Employment Behavior in Contemporary Russia.” Sociological Research 41 (1): 21-37. Attwood, Lynne, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova. 2018. “Introduction.” In Gender and Choice after Socialism, edited by Lynne Attwood, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova, xiii-xxiii. Cham: Springer International. Avdeyeva, Olga A. 2011. “Policy Experiment in Russia: Cash-for-Babies and Fertility Change.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State Society 18 (3): 361-86. Baker, Jordan. 2022. “The Desperate Mission to Get an Australian Baby out of Ukraine.” Sidney Morning Herald, March 4. https://www.smh.com.au/world/ europe/the-desperate-mission-to-get-an-australian-baby-out-of-ukraine20220303-p5alhj.html. 257
258 REFERENCES Bandak, Andreas, and Manpreet K. Janeja. 2018. “Introduction: Worth the Wait.” In Ethnographies of Waiting: Doubt, Hope and Uncertainty, edited by Manpreet K. Janeja and Andreas Bandak, 1-39. Oxford: Bloomsbury. Banerjee, Amrita. 2010. “Reorienting the Ethics of Transnational Surrogacy as a Feminist Pragmatist.” The Pluralist 5 (3): 107-27. Bärnreuther, Sandra. 2019. “When Time Stretches: Waiting and in Vitro Fertilization in India.” Collection Purușărtha 36: 269-85. ------. 2021. Substantial Relations: Making Global Reproductive Medicine in Postcolonial India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. BBC. 2022. “What Are the Sanctions on Russia and Are They Hurting Its Economy?” June 27. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60125659 . Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------. 2002. “Deciding Whether to Tell Children about Donor Insemination: An Unresolved Question in the United States.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 119-33. Berkeley: University of California Press. Becker, Gay, Anneliese Butler, and Robert D. Nachtigall. 2005. “Resemblance Talk: A Challenge for Parents Whose Children Were Conceived with Donor Gametes in the US.” Social Science Medicine 61 (6) : 1300-1309. Berend, Zsuzsa. 2016. The Online World of Surrogacy. New York: Berghahn Books. Berger, Miriam. 2022. “Putin Says He Will ‘Denazify’ Ukraine: Here’s the History behind
That Claim.” Washington Post, February 25. https://www. washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/24/putin-denazify-ukraine/. Bergmann, Sven. 2012. “Resemblance that Matters: On Transnational Anonymized Egg Donation in Two European IVF Clinics.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 331-55. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag. ------. 2014. Ausweichrouten der Reproduktion: Biomedizinische Mobilität und die Praxis der Eizellspende. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Bernstein, Anya. 2013. “An Inadvertent Sacrifice: Body Politics and Sovereign Power in the Pussy Riot Affair.” Critical Inquiry 40 (1): 220-41. Berntsen, Sine, Viveca Söderström-Anttila, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm, Hannele Laivuori, Anne Loft, Nan B. Oldereid, Liv Bente Romundstad, Christina Bergh, and Anja Pinborg. 2019. “The Health of Children Conceived by ART: ‘The Chicken or the Eggl’” Human Reproduction Update 25 (2): 137-58. Beskaravajnaya, Tatyana. 2020. “EKO den’gi.” Medvestik, April 20. https://medvestnik. ru/content/articles/EKO-dengi.html. Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2006. “Sacred Modernity: Religion, Infertility, and Technoscientific Conception around the Globe.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30 (4): 451-65. Bilefsky, Dan, Richard Pérez-Peña, and Eric Nagourney. 2022. “The Roots of the Ukraine War: How the Crisis Developed.” New York Times, April 21. https:// www.nytimes.com/article/russia-ukraine-nato-europe.html . Blum, Susan D. 2007. Lies that Bind: Chinese Truth, Other Truths.
Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Bondar, Yuliya. 2017. “Sud obyazal surrogatnuyu mat’ otdat’ detej zakazchikam.” Medportal, August 10. https://medportal.ru/mednovosti/ sud-obyazal-surrogatnuyu-mat-otdat-detey-zakazchikam/.
REFERENCES 259 Boris, Eileen, and Rhacel Salazar Parreñas. 2010. “Introduction.” In Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies and the Politics of Care, 1-17. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Borozdina, Ekaterina, Anna Rotkirch, Anna Temkina, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2016. “Using Maternity Capital: Citizen Distrust of Russian Family Policy.” European Journal of Women's Studies 23 (1): 60-75. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2007. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bowdler, Neil. 2020. “Russia Hopes ‘Test-Tube Babies’ Will Boost Birthrates.” Radio Free Europe, February 15. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-hopes֊test-tubebabies-will-boost֊birthrates/30434656.html. Brednikova, Olga, Nadya Nartova, and Olga Tkach. 2009. “Assisted Reproduction in Russia: Legal Regulations and Public Debates.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 43-56. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Brennan, Christopher. 2014. “Russia Bans Adoptions to Countries Where Gay Marriage Is Legal.” Moscow Times, February 13. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/02/13/ russia-bans-adoptions-to-countries-where-gay-marriage-is-legal-a32064. Butler, Judith. 2015. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge. Callaghan, Louise. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers Fear Pressure to Flee Ukraine.” The Times, February 20. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ surrogate-mothers-fear-pressure-to-flee-ukraine-gsntx9z7f. Carthaus, Anna. 2022. “Ukrainische
Leihmütter zwischen den Fronten.” Deutsche Welle, March 23. https://www.dw.com/de/ ukrainische-leihm%C3%BCtter-zwischen-den-fronten/a-61263581. Chak, Kerry. 2013. “Ukraine Has the Worst Roads and the Best Reproductive Medicine in the World.” News Europe, February 6. http://newseurope.info/ukraine-hasthe-worst-roads-and-the-best-reproductive-medicine-in-theworld/. Chemodanova, Ksenia. 2019. “Dorogo i opasno: Kak surrogatnye materi obmanyvayut zakazchikov.” Gazeta, October 31. https://www.gazeta.ru/ business/2019/08/28/12608059.shtml. CNN. 2022. “‘We Walked 8 Miles with a Newborn’: US Couple Describes Their Dangerous Escape from Ukraine.” March 3. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=APhWmeRHgxc. Cohen, Lawrence. 1999. “Where It Hurts: Indian Material for an Ethics of Organ Transplantation.” Daedalus 128 (4): 135-65. ------. 2005. “Operability, Bioavailability, and Exception.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, 79-90. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Constable, Nicole. 2006. “Brides, Maids, and Prostitutes: Reflections on the Study of ‘Trafficked’ Women.” PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 3 (2): 1-25. ------. 2009. “The Commodification of Intimacy: Marriage, Sex, and Reproductive Labor.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 38 (1): 49-64. Cooper, Melinda, and Catherine Waldby. 2014. Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
260 REFERENCES Corea, Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper and Row. Corrigan, Oonagh. 2003. “Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.” Sociology of Health Illness 25 (7): 768-92. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and World Health Organization, eds. 2002. “International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.” CIOMS. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/ uploads/2016/08/International_Ethical_Guidelines_for_Biomedical_Research_ Involving_Human_Subjects.pdf. Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 1994. “The Technocratic Body: American Childbirth as Cultural Expression.” Social Science Medicine 38 (8): 1125-40. De Lacey, Sheryl. 2002. “IVF as Lottery or Investment: Contesting Metaphors in Discourses of Infertility.” Nursing Inquiry 9 (1): 43-51. Dempsey, Deborah. 2015. “Relating across International Borders: Gay Men Forming Families through Overseas Surrogacy.” In Globalized Fatherhood, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn, Wendy Chavkin, and José-Alberto Navarro, 267-90. New York: Berghahn Books. Deomampo, Daisy. 2013a. “Transnational Surrogacy in India: Interrogating Power and Women’s Agency.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 167-88. ------. 2013b. “Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism.” Gender Society 27 (4): 514-37. ------. 2016. Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press. Dionisius, Sarah. 2015. “Queer Matters: Family-Building Processes of Lesbian Couples Using Donor
Insemination.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (3): 283-301. Disney, Tom. 2015. “Complex Spaces of Orphan Care—a Russian Therapeutic Children’s Community.” Children’s Geographies 13 (1): 30-43. ------. 2017. “The Orphanage as an Institution of Coercive Mobility.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (8): 1905-21. Dow, Katharine. 2015. “‘A Nine-Month Head-Start’: The Maternal Bond and Surrogacy.” Ethnos 82 (1): 1-19. ------. 2016. Making a Good Life: An Ethnography ofNature, Ethics, and Reproduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Druzenko, Gennadiy. 2013. “Ukraine.” In International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level, edited by Katarina Trimmings and Paul Beaumont, 357-65. Studies in Private International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Dumit, Joseph, and Robbie Davis-Floyd. 1998. “Cyborg Babies: Children from the Third Millennium.” In Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, edited by Joseph Dumit, 1-20. New York: Routledge. Dushina, Anastasia, Yuliya Kersha, Tatyana Larkina, and Daria Provorova. 2016. “Legitimatsiya Kommercheskogo Surrogatnogo Materinstva v Rossii.” Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya 17 (1): 62-79. Duttagupta, Ishani. 2015. “Why Surrogacy Issue Emerges after Nepal Earthquake.” Economic Times, May 5. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/ globalindian/why-surrogacy-issue-emerges-after-nepal-earthquake/. Ertman, Martha Μ. 2010. “The Upside of Baby Markets.” In Baby Markets: Money and the New Politics of Creating Families, edited by Michele Goodwin, 23-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
REFERENCES 261 Essig, Laurie. 1999. Queer in Russia: A Story of Sex, Self, and the Other. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2018. “Informing Offspring of Their Conception by Gamete or Embryo Donation: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 109 (4): 601-5. European Social Survey. 2017. ESS Round 8 (2016/2017) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC. Fassin, Didier. 2009. “Moral Economies Revisited.” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 64 (6): 1237-66. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. Feldman, Ilana. 2007. “The Quaker Way: Ethical Labor and Humanitarian Relief.” American Ethnologist 34 (4): 689-705. Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Finch, Janet. 2007. “Displaying Families.” Sociology 41 (1): 65-81. Fine, Cordelia. 2017. Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Sex of Our Gendered Minds. London: Icon Books. Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: William Morrow. Fisher, Max. “The Real Reason Russia Wants to Ban Adoptions by‘Dangerous’ American Families.” Washington Post, December 28. https.7/www. washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/12/28/the-real-reason-russiawants-to-ban-adoptions-by-dangerous-american-families/. Fixmer-Oraiz, Natalie. 2013. “Speaking of Solidarity: Transnational Gestational Surrogacy and the Rhetorics of
Reproductive (In)Justice.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 126-63. Flatley, Jonathan. 2008. Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Førde, Kristin Engh. 2016. Intimate Distance: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. Oslo: University of Oslo. ------ . 2017. “Fair Play in a Dirty Field: The Ethical Work of Commissioning Surrogacy in India.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 37-48. New York: Routledge. Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1, An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books. ------ . 1987. The Foucault Reader. Edited by Paul Rabinów. New York: Pantheon Books. ------ . 1990. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 2, The Use ofPleasure. New York: Vintage Books. ------ . 1997. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Vol. 1 of The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Edited by Paul Rabinów. London: Penguin Books. Fourcade, Marion, and Kieran Healy. 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 285-311. France 24. 2020. “Russia Funds IVF Baby Boom to Battle Population Slump.” January 20. https://www.france24.eom/en/20200130-russia-funds-ivf-babyboom-to-battle-population-slump. Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: Cultural Account ofAssisted Conception. London: Routledge. ------ . 1998. “Making Miracles: Scientific Progress and the Facts of Life.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, edited
262 REFERENCES by Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 102-17. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ------ . 2012. “Five Million Miracle Babies Later: Biocultural Legacies of ГѴЕ” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 27-58. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag. ------ . 2013. Biological Relatives: TVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Franklin, Sarah, and Helena Ragoné. 1998. “Introduction.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, edited by Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 1-14. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Fujimura, Clementine K. 2005. Russia’s Abandoned Children: An Intimate Understanding. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. Funk, Nanette. 2004. “Feminist Critiques of Liberalism: Can They Travel East? Their Relevance in Eastern and Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (3): 695-726. Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2013. Putin kaputt!? Russlands neue Protestkultur. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Gal, Susan. 2002. “A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction.” Differences: A Journal ofFeminist Cultural Studies 13 (1): 77-95. Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Garner-Purkis, Zak. 2022. “‘We Hope No Missiles Hit Hospitals’: The Ukrainian Woman Caught between Scared Surrogate Mums and Panicking Parents.” My
London, March 7. https://www.mylondon.news/news/uk-world-news/ we-hope-no-missiles-hit-23317102. Gershon, Ilana. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537-55. Gilligan, Carol. 2003. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. ------ . 1989. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18: 123-32. Golombok, S., A. Brewaeys, Μ. T. Giavazzi, D. Guerra, F. MacCallum, and J. Rust. 2002. “The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: The Transition to Adolescence.” Human Reproduction 17 (3): 830-40. Grigoryan, Anzhelina, and Yana Zainitdinova. 2019. “Inostrantsy massovo zakazyvayut surrogatnoe materinstvo u rossiyanok za million rublej.” Riafan, July 23. https:// riafan.ru/1189990-inostrancy-massovo-zakazyvayut-surrogatnoe-materinstvou-rossiyanok-za-million-rublei. Gryshchenko, Mykola, and Alexey Pravdyuk. 2016. “Gestational Surrogacy in Ukraine.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, edited by E. Scott Sills, 250-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grytsenko, Oksana. 2020. “The Stranded Babies of Kyiv and the Women Who Give Birth for Money.” The Guardian, June 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/ the-stranded-babies-of-kyiv-and-the-women-who֊give-birth-for-money. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny. 2015. “Reproduction in Transition: Cross-Border Egg Donation, Biodesirability and New Reproductive Subjectivities on the
European Fertility Market.” Gender, Place Culture 22 (1): 107-22.
REFERENCES 263 ------. 2016. “Grammars of Kinship: Biological Motherhood and Assisted Reproduction in the Age of Epigenetics.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41 (3): 483-506. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny, and Elżbieta Korolczuk. 2016. “Reproducing Politics: The Politicisation of Patients’ Identities and Assisted Reproduction in Poland and Sweden.” Sociology of Health Illness 38 (7): 1074-91. Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny, Elżbieta Korolczuk, and Signe Mezinska. 2020. “Surrogacy Relationships: A Critical Interpretative Review.” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 125 (0): 183-91. Gupta, Jyotsna Agnihotri, and Annemiek Richters. 2008. “Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination.” Journal ofBioethical Inquiry 5 (4): 239-49. Guseva, Alya. 2020. “Scandals, Morality Wars, and the Field of Reproductive Surrogacy in Ukraine.” Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter 21 (3): 4-10. Guseva, Alya, and Vyacheslav Lokshin. 2019. “Medical Conceptions of Control in the Field of Commercial Surrogacy in Kazakhstan.” Salute e Società 1: 26-43. Hage, Ghassan. 2009a. “Introduction.” In Waiting, edited by Ghassan Hage, 1-12. Victoria: Melbourne University Press. ------. 2009b. “Waiting Out the Crisis: On Stuckedness and Governmentality.” In Waiting, edited by Ghassan Hage, 97-106. Victoria: Melbourne University Press. Halliday, Jane, Sharon Lewis, Joanne Kennedy, David P. Burgner, Markus Juonala, Karin Hammarberg, David J. Amor, Lex W. Doyle, Richard Saffery, Sarath Ranganathan, Liam Welsh,
Michael Cheung, John McBain, Stephen J.C. Hearps, and Robert McLachlan. 2019. “Health of Adults Aged 22 to 35 Years Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.” Fertility and Sterility 112 (1): 130-39. Hardt, Michael. 1999. “Affective Labor.” Boundary 2 26 (2): 89-100. Harrison, Laura. 2016. Brown Bodies, White Babies: The Politics of Cross-Racial Surrogacy. New York: New York University Press. Hawley, Samantha. 2018. “Surrogacy in Ukraine in Spotlight after Disabled Child Abandoned.” ABC News, August 20. https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/ am/surrogacy-in-ukraine-in-spotlight/1 1430452. Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hellman, Andrew, and Glenn Cohen. 2017. “Prohibiting Sperm Donor Anonymity in the US and Possible Effects on Recruitment and Compensation.” BioNews (blog), April 4. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95954. Hemmings, Clare, and Amal Treacher Kabesh. 2013. “The Feminist Subject of Agency: Recognition and Affect in Encounters with ‘the Other.’” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 29-46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Heut, Nathalia, and Naira Davlashyan. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers, Babies and Frozen Embryos Trapped by Ukraine War as IVF Parents Watch in Horror.” Euronews, March 18. https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/03/ll/surrogacy-in-crisis-asukraine-war-leaves-newborns-stranded-in-bomb-shelters-and-families- . Hibino, Yuri, and Yosuke Shimazono. 2013. “Becoming a Surrogate Online: ‘Message Board’ Surrogacy in Thailand.” Asian
Bioethics Review 5 (1): 56-72. Hildebrand, Sarah, Gerhild Perl, Julia Rehsmann, and Veronika Siegl, eds. 2018. hope. Basel: Christoph Merian Verlag, https://www.merianverlag.ch/produkt/ fotografie/hope/b79ed4db-c980-4e41 -b450-el3b75244e8e.html.
264 REFERENCES Hochschild, Arlie. 2012. “Back Stage of the Global Free Market: Nannies and Surrogates.” In Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen, edited by Hans-Georg Soeffner, 1125-38. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2000. “Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value.” In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, edited by Anthony Giddens and Will Hutton, 130-46. London: Jonathan Cape. ------. 2003. The Managed Heart: Commercialization ofHuman Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. Hoeyer, Klaus, and Linda F. Hogle. 2014. “Informed Consent: The Politics of Intent and Practice in Medical Research Ethics.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 43 (1): 347-62. Hofmann, Susanne, and Adi Moreno. 2016. “Introduction. Global Intimate Economies: Discontents and Debates.” In Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions, and Sexualities on the Global Market, edited by Susanne Hofmann and Adi Moreno, 1-29. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Holmgren, Beth. 2013. “Toward an Understanding of Gendered Agency in Contemporary Russia.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3): 535-42. Hovav, April. 2020. “Cutting out the Surrogate: Caesarean Sections in the Mexican Surrogacy Industry.” Social Science Medicine 256: 113-63. Human Rights Watch. 2014. “Abandoned by the State: Violence, Neglect, and Isolation for Children with Disabilities in Russian Orphanages.” https://www.hrw.org/ sites/default/files/reports/russia0914_ForUploadweb.pdf. larskaia-Smirnova, Elena, and Pavel Romanov. 2012. “Doing Class in Social Welfare Discourses: 'Unfortunate
Families’ in Russia.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 85-106. Farnham: Ashgate. Inhorn, Marcia C. 1994. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ------ . 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and in Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. London: Routledge. ------ . 2004. “Privacy, Privatization, and the Politics of Patronage: Ethnographic Challenges to Penetrating the Secret World of Middle Eastern, Hospital-Based in Vitro Fertilization.” Social Science Ժ Medicine 59 (10): 2095-2108. ------ . 2007. Reproductive Disruptions: Gender, Technology, and Biopolitics in the New Millennium. London: Berghahn Books. ------ . 2011. “Globalization and Gametes: Reproductive ‘Tourism,’ Islamic Bioethics, and Middle Eastern Modernity.” Anthropology Medicine 18 (1): 87-103. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Frank van Balen. 2002. “Introduction. Interpreting Infertility: A View from the Social Sciences.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 3-32. Berkeley: University of California Press. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli. 2018. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In The International Encyclopedia ofAnthropology, edited by Hilary Callan, 1-6. New York: John Wiley Sons. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Pasquale Patrizio. 2012. “The Global Landscape of CrossBorder Reproductive Care: Twenty Key Findings for the New Millennium.” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 24
(3): 158-63. Interfax. 2009. “Glavnyj pediatr Rossii vystupayet protiv podderzhaniya na gosudarstvennom urovnye tekhnologii iskusstvyennogo oplodotvoreniya.” September 28. https://www.interfax-russia.ru/siberia/report/
REFERENCES 265 glavnyy-pediatr-rossii-vystupaet-protiv-podderzhaniya-na-gosudarstvennomurovne-tehnologii-iskusstvennogo-oplodotvoreniya. Issoupova, Olga. 2000. “From Duty to Pleasure? Motherhood in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia.” In Gender, State and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, edited by Sarah Ashwin, 30-54. London: Routledge. Isupova, Olga G. 2011. “Support through Patient Internet-Communities: Lived Experience of Russian in Vitro Fertilization Patients.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 6 (3): no. 5907 (n.p.) Jacobson, Heather. 2016. Labor ofLove: Gestational Surrogacy and the Work ofMaking Babies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Jadva, V., L. Blake, P. Casey, and S. Golombok. 2012. “Surrogacy Families 10 Years On: Relationship with the Surrogate, Decisions over Disclosure and Children’s Understanding of Their Surrogacy Origins.” Human Reproduction 27 (10): 3008-14. Kahn, Susan Martha. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account ofAssisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Kato, Brooke. 2022. “Ukrainian Surrogates Must Return to War Zone to Give Birth to Westerners’Babies.” New York Post, March 9. https://nypost.com/2022/03/09/ ukrainian-surrogates-must-return-to-war-zone-to-give-birth/. Kay, Rebecca. 2002. “A Liberation from Emancipation? Changing Discourses on Women’s Employment in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18 (1): 51-72. Kempadoo, Kamala, and Jo Doezema, eds. 1998. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition.
London: Routledge. Khodyakov, Dmitry. 2007. “Trust as a Process: A Three-Dimensional Approach.” Sociology41 (1): 115-32. Khvorostyanov, Natalia, and Daphna Yeshua-Katz. 2020. “Bad, Pathetic and Greedy Women: Expressions of Surrogate Motherhood Stigma in a Russian Online Forum.” Sex Roles 83 (7): 474-84. Kierans, Ciara, and Kirsten Bell. 2017. “Cultivating Ambivalence: Some Methodological Considerations for Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (2): 23-44. Kirpichenko, Maria. 2017. “Russian Legislative Practices and Debates on the Restriction of Wide Access to ARTs.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 232-48. New York: Routledge. ------. 2020. “Ideology of Simulation: The Material-Semiotic Production of the Surrogate in the Web Worldings of Russian Surrogacy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies (online), June 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506820922603. Klimchuk, Oleg, and Viktor Cheretski. 2018. “Ukraine’s Surrogacy Industry Leaves Parents in Limbo.” Deutsche Welle, September 7. https://www.dw.com/en/ ukraines-surrogacy-industry-leaves-parents-in֊limbo/a-45371478. Klomegah, Kester Kenn. 2021. “Moment of Truth: Russia Faces Demography Crisis.” Modern Diplomacy (blog), February 3. https.7/moderndiplomacy. eu/2021/02/03/moment-of-truth-russia-faces-demography-crisis/. Knecht, Michi, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck. 2012. “Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Introduction.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies ofKnowledge,
Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 11-26. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag.
266 REFERENCES Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Riverside. Kolesnikova, Varvara. 2021a. “RAHR nazvala zakonproyekt о surrogatnom materinstvye nekonstitutsionnym.” Vademecum, February 2. https://vademec. ru/news/2021/02/02/rarch-nazvala-zakonoproekt-o-surrogatnommaterinstve-nekonstitutsionnym/. ------. 2021b. “V kakom regulirovanii nuzhdayetsya rynok surrogatnogo materinstva v Rossii.” Vademecum, June 7. https.7Zvademec.ru/article/v_kakom_regulirovanii_ nuzhdaetsya_rynok_surrogatnogo_materinstva_v_rossii/. König, Anika. 2018. “Parents on the Move: German Intended Parents’ Experiences with Transnational Surrogacy.” In Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from India, Germany and Israel, edited by Sayani Mitra, Silke Schicktanz, and Tulsi Patel, 277-99. Cham: Springer International. König, Anika, Anindita Majumdar, and Heather Jacobson. 2020. “‘Pandemic Disruptions’ in Surrogacy Arrangements in Germany, U.S.A., and India during COVID-19.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly Rapid Response Blog Series, August 11. https://medanthroquarterly.org/rapid-response/2020Z08/ pandemic-disruptions-in-surrogacy-arrangements-in-germany-u-s-a/. Konrad, Monica. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. London: Berghahn Books. Korelina, Olga. 2020. ‘“A Flagrant Rights Violation’: State Investigators in Russia Reportedly Plan to Arrest Single Gay Fathers on Child Trafficking Charges.” Meduza, October 1.
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/01/a-flagrantrights-violation. Korolczuk, Elżbieta. 2014. “Terms of Engagement: Re-defining Identity and Infertility On-line.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 6 (2): 431-49. ------. 2016. “‘The Purest Citizens’ and ‘IVF Children’: Reproductive Citizenship in Contemporary Poland.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 3: 126-33. Krainova, Natalya. 2013. “Mizulina’s Surrogacy Ban Idea Ridiculed.” Moscow Times, November 11. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/2013/ll/ll/ mizulinas-surrogacy-ban-idea-ridiculed-a29455. Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø. 2014. “West Is Best: Affective Assemblages and Spanish Oöcytes.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (1): 57-71. ------. 2015. “Have Eggs, Will Travel: The Experiences and Ethics of Global Egg Donation.” Somatechnics 5 (1): 12-31. Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø, and Saumya Pant. 2012. “‘I Only Need Her Uterus’: Neo Liberal Discourses on Transnational Surrogacy.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 20 (4): 233-48. Kruglova, Anna. 2016. “Anything Can Happen: Everyday Morality and Social Theory in Russia.” PhD thesis, University of Toronto. Kurlenkova, Alexandra. 2018. “Ova Exchange Practices at a Moscow Fertility Clinic: Gift or Commodity?” In Health, Technologies, and Politics in Post-Soviet Settings, edited by Olga Zvonareva, Evgeniya Popova, and Klasien Horstman, 173-97. Cham: Springer International. Kuznetsova, Yevgeniya, and Yegor Gubernatorov. 2021. “Deputaty podgotovili zapryet na surrogatnoe materinstvo dlya odinokikh lyudej.” RBC, January 19. https://
www.rbc.ru/politics/19/01/2021/6006e6759a79472e23983481. Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
REFERENCES 267 Lally, Kathy, and Will Englund. 2012. "Russia Fumes as U.S. Senate Passes Measure Aimed at Human Rights.” Washington Post, December 6. https://www. washingtonpost.com/world/europe/us-passes-magnitsky-bill-aimedatrussia/2012/12/06/262a5bba-3fd5-l Ie2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html. Lambek, Michael. 2010. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press. Leibetseder, Doris. 2020. “Precarious Bodily Performances in Queer and Transgender Reproduction with ART.” In Bodily Interventions and Intimate Labour: Understanding Bioprecarity, edited by Gabriele Griffin and Doris Leibetseder, 79-94. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Lemke, Thomas. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press. Lettow, Susanne. 2015. “Population, Race and Gender: On the Genealogy of the Modern Politics of Reproduction.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16(3): 267-82. Lewis, Sophie. 2019. “Surrogacy as Feminism: The Philanthrocapitalist Framing of Contract Pregnancy.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 40 (1): 1-38. Leykin, Inna. 2019. “The History and Afterlife of Soviet Demography: The Socialist Roots of Post-Soviet Neoliberalism.” Slavic Review 78 (1): 149-72. Lock, Margaret. 2001. “The Tempering of Medical Anthropology: Troubling Natural Categories.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (4): 478-92. Lock, Margaret, and Patricia Kauffert. 1998. “Introduction.” In Pragmatic Women and Body Politics, edited by Margaret Lock and Patricia A Kauffert, 1-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Loktionova,
Maria. 2020. “Minzdrav RF nameren izmenit’ zakon o surrogatnom materinstve s yanvarya.” Gazeta, October 21. https://www.gazeta.ru/social/ 2020/10/20/13326049.shtml. Lustenberger, Sibylle. 2016. “From Mumbai to Tel Aviv: Distance and Intimacy in Transnational Surrogacy Arrangements.” Journal ofMiddle East Women’s Studies 12 (2): 203-24. Luxmoore, Matthew. 2020. “The Putin Constitution: How Will It Change Russia?” Radio Free Europe, July 1. https://www.rfer].org/a/the-putin-constitution-howwill-it-change-russia/30699899.html. Maciejewska-Mroczek, Ewa. 2019. “Tactile Crease: The Embodiment of Anti-IVF Discourses in Poland.” Ethnologia Europaea 49 (1): 91-102. Maciejewska-Mroczek, Ewa, and Magdalena Radkowska-Walkowicz. 2017. “Between Monster Child and Innocent Baby: Managing Fear and Hope in Polish Debates on in Vitro Fertilization.” In Childhood, Literature and Science: Fragile Subjects, edited by Jutta Ahibeck, Päivi Lappalainen, Kati Launis, and Kirsi Tuohela, 184-95. London: Routledge. Magnus, Maria C., Allen J. Wilcox, Elin A. Fadum, Håkon K. Gjessing, Signe Opdahl, Petur В. Juliusson, Liv Bente Romundstad, and Siri E. Håberg. 2021. “Growth in Children Conceived by ART.” Human Reproduction 36 (4): 1074-82. Mair, Jonathan, Ann Kelly, and Casey High. 2016. “Introduction: Making Ignorance an Ethnographic Object.” In Anthropology ofIgnorance: An Ethnographic Approach, edited by Casey High, Ann Kelly, and Jonathan Mair, 1-32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Majumdar, Anindita. 2017. Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Makin՝ of Kin in India. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. Makarychev, Andrey, and Sergei Medvedev. 2015. “Biopolitics and Power in Putin’s Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 62 (1): 45-54.
268 REFERENCES Malich, Lisa. 2017. Die Gefühle der Schwangeren: Eine Geschichte somatischer Emotionalität (1780-2010). Bielefeld: Transcript. Mamo, Laura. 2007. Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Markens, Susan. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------ . 2012. “The Global Reproductive Health Market: U.S. Media Framings and Public Discourses about Transnational Surrogacy.” Social Science Medicine 74 (11): 1745-53. Martin, Emily. 2001. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis ofReproduction. Boston: Beacon Press. Mattingly, Cheryl. 2019. “Waiting.” Cambridge Journal ofAnthropology 37 (1): 17-31. Matza, Tomas. 2009. “Moscow’s Echo: Technologies of the Self, Publics, and Politics on the Russian Talk Show.” Cultural Anthropology 24 (3): 489-522. ------ . 2012.“ ‘Good Individualism’? Psychology, Ethics, and Neoliberalism in Postsocialist Russia.” American Ethnologist 39 (4): 804-18. Mauss, Marcel. 1966. The Gift: Forms and Functions ofExchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen West. Mayes, Christopher, Jane Williams, and Wendy Lipworth. 2018. “Conflicted Hope: Social Egg Freezing and Clinical Conflicts of Interest.” Health Sociology Review 27 (1): 45-59. Merz, Theo. 2020. “Single Fathers with Children via Surrogates Flee Russia amid Crackdown.” The Guardian, October 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/15/ single-fathers-in-russia-with-surrogate-babies-become-official-target. Mies, Maria. 1986. “Reproduktionstechnik als
sexistische und rassistische Bevölkerungspolitik.” In Frauen gegen Gentechnik und Reproduktionstechnologien, edited by А. К. Frauenpolitik, 44-47. Cologne: Kölner Volksblatt. Mishtal, Joanna. 2012. “Irrational Non-Reproduction? The ‘Dying Nation’ and the Postsocialist Logics of Declining Motherhood in Poland.” Anthropology drMedicine 19 (2): 153-69. ------ . 2015. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press. Mitra, Sayani. 2017. “Disruptive Embodiments: A Study of Risks and Disruptions during Commercial Surrogacy in India.” PhD thesis, Georg-August University of Göttingen. Mitra, Sayani, and Silke Schicktanz. 2016. “Failed Surrogate Conceptions: Social and Ethical Aspects of Preconception Disruptions during Commercial Surrogacy in India.” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 11 (1): 1-16. Mitter, Vera R. 2020. Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes of Women Treated for Subfertility and Children Born after in Vitro Fertilisation. Bern: University of Bern. Mohanty, Chandra Talpadé. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Boundary 2 12 (3) / 13 (1): 333-58. Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge. Moore, Cortney. 2022. “Surrogate Mothers Rescued from Ukraine War.” New York Post, April 18. https://nypost.com/2022/04/18/ project-dynamo-rescues-surrogate-mothers-from-ukraine-war/.
REFERENCES 269 Moreno, Adi. 2016. “Families on the Market Front.” In Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions, and Sexualities on the Global Market, edited by Susanne Hofmann and Adi Moreno, 233-59. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Morgan, Lynn, and Elizabeth Roberts. 2012. “Reproductive Governance in Latin America.” Anthropology Medicine 19 (2): 241-254. Motluk, Alison. 2022. “Ukraine’s Surrogacy Industry Has Put Women in Impossible Positions.” The Atlantic, March 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/ archive/2022/03/russia-invasion-ukraine-surrogate-family/623327/. Mouliarova, Ekaterina. 2019. “The Legal Regulation of Surrogacy in Russia.” Italian Journal of Public Law 11 (1): 393-433. Murray, Clare, and Susan Golombok. 2003. “To Tell or Not to Tell: The DecisionMaking Process of Egg-Donation Parents.” Human Fertility 6 (2): 89-95. Nahman, Michal. 2008. “Nodes of Desire: Romanian Egg Sellers, ‘Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (2): 65-82. ------. 2010. ‘“Embryos Are Our Baby’: Abridging Hope, Body and Nation in Transnational Ova Donation.” In Technologized Images, Technologized Bodies, edited by Jeanette Edwards, Penelope Harvey, and Peter Wade, 185-210. New York: Berghahn Books. ------. 2011. "Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 626-33. Narotzky, Susana. 2018. “Rethinking the Concept of Labour.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 24 (SI): 29-43. Narotzky, Susana, and Niko Besnier. 2014. “Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the
Economy. An Introduction to Supplement 9.” Current Anthropology 55 (S9): S4-16. Nartova, Nadya. 2009. “Surrogate Motherhood and Sperm Donorship in the Russian Media: Normalising the Body.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 75-94. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Neal, Will. 2020. “Ukrainian Police in Baby-Mill Bust.” Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, April 29. https://www.occrp.org/en/ daily/12226-ukrainian-police-in-baby-mill-bust. Nebeling Petersen, Michael, Charlotte Kroløkke, and Lene Myong. 2017. “Dad and Daddy Assemblage: Resuturing the Nation through Transnational Surrogacy, Homosexuality, and Norwegian Exceptionalism.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 23 (1): 83-112. Nechepurenko, Ivan. 2013. “Rainbow Lamp Post Is Not Gay Propaganda, Prosecutors Say.” Moscow Times, September 24. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2013/09/24/ rainbow-lamppost-is-not-gay-propagandaprosecutors-say-a27983. Nordqvist, Petra. 2010. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Family Resemblances in Lesbian Donor Conception.” Sociology 44 (6): 1128-44. ------. 2014. “The Drive for Openness in Donor Conception: Disclosure and the Trouble with Real Life.” International Journal ofLaw, Policy and the Family 28 (3): 321-38. ------. 2021. “Telling Reproductive Stories: Social Scripts, Relationality and Donor Conception.” Sociology 55 (4): 677-95. Nordqvist, Petra, and Carol Smart. 2014. “Relational Lives, Relational Selves: Assisted Reproduction and the Impact on Grandparents.” In
Relatedness in Assisted Production: Families, Origins and Identities, edited by Tabitha Freeman,
270 REFERENCES Susanna Graham, Fatemela Ebtehaj, and Martin Richards, 548-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. North, Douglass C. 2010. Understanding the Process ofEconomic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Onisenko, Kostas. 2020. “Russian Orthodox Church Expressed Opposition to in Vitro Fertilization.” Orthodox Times, September 21. https://orthodoxtimes.com/ russian-orthodox-church-expressed-opposition-to-in-vitro-fertilization. Orejudo Prieto de los Mozos, Patricia. 2013. “Spain.” In International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level, edited by Katarina Trimmings and Paul Beaumont, 347-55. Studies in Private International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Palomera, Jaime, and Theodora Vetta. 2016. “Moral Economy: Rethinking a Radical Concept.” Anthropological Theory 16 (4): 413-32. Panchenko, Alexander. 2012. ‘“Popular Orthodoxy’ and Identity in Soviet and PostSoviet Russia: Ideology, Consumption and Competition.” In Soviet and PostSoviet Identities, edited by Mark Bassin and Catriona Kelly, 321-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pande, Amrita. 2009. “‘It May Be Her Eggs But It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology 32 (4): 379-97. ------. 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect MotherWorker.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35 (4): 969-92. ------. 2011. “Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India: Gifts for Global Sisters?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 618-25. ------ . 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial
Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press. ------. 2015. “Blood, Sweat and Dummy Tummies: Kin Labour and Transnational Surrogacy in India.” Anthropologica 57 (1): 53-62. ------ . 2016. “Surrogates Are Workers, Not Wombs.” The Hindu, August 29. https:// www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Surrogates-are-workers-not-wombs/ article 14594820.ece. ------. 2021. “Revisiting Surrogacy in India: Domino Effects of the Ban.” Journal of Gender Studies 30 (4): 395-405. Pande, Amrita, and Tessa Moll. 2018. “Gendered Bio-Responsibilities and Travelling Egg Providers from South Africa.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 6: 23-33. Parry, Bronwyn. 2015. “Narratives of Neoliberalism: ‘Clinical Labour’ in Context.” Medical Humanities 41 (1): 32-37. Pascual, Julia. 2022. “Des mères porteuses ukrainiennes prises au piège de la guerre.” Le Monde, April 24. https://www.lemonde.fr/m-le-mag/article/2022/04/24/desmeres-porteuses-ukrainiennes-prises-au-piege-de-la-guerre_6123417_4500055. html. Pático, Jennifer. 2005. “To Be Happy in a Mercedes: Tropes of Value and Ambivalent Visions of Marketization.” American Ethnologist 32 (3): 479-96. ------ . 2009. “For Love, Money, or Normalcy: Meanings of Strategy and Sentiment in the Russian-American Matchmaking Industry/’ Ethnos 74 (3): 307-30. Paxson, Heather. 2003. “With or against Nature? IVF, Gender and Reproductive Agency in Athens, Greece.” In “Reproduction Gone Awry,” special issue, Social Science Medicine 56 (9): 1853-66. Pennings, Guido. 2004. “Legal Harmonization and Reproductive Tourism in Europe.” Human Reproduction 19 (12):
2689-94.
REFERENCES 271 ------. 2009. “The Green Grass on the Other Side: Crossing Borders to Obtain Infertility Treatment.” Facts, Views Vision in ObGyn 1(1): 1-6. ------. 2010. “The Rough Guide to Insemination: Cross-Border Travelling for Donor Semen Due to Different Regulations.” In Artificial Insemination: An Update, edited by Willem Ombelet and Herman Tournaye, Facts, Views Vision in ObGyn Monograph (Wetteren: Universa Press), 55-60. Perler, Laura. 2022. Selektioniertes Leben: Einefeministische Perspektive auf die Eizellenspende. Münster: Edition Assemblage. Perler, Laura, and Carolin Schurr. 2021. “Intimate Lives in the Global Bioeconomy: Reproductive Biographies of Mexican Egg Donors.” Body Society 27 (3): 3-27. Persson, Emil. 2015. “Banning ‘Homosexual Propaganda’: Belonging and Visibility in Contemporary Russian Media.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 256-74. Petropanagos, Angel. 2017. “Pronatalism, Geneticism, and ART.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1): 119-47. Petrov, Ivan. 2020. “Materinskaya plata: SKR rasslefuyet smerf rebyonka surrogatnoj materi. Kak ustroyen biznes po prodazhe rozhdyennykh v Rossi։ detey inostrantsam.” Izvestia, January 16. https://iz.ru/964655/ivanpetrov/ materinskaia-plata-skr-rassleduet-smert-rebenka-surrogatnoi-materi. Pfeffer, Naomi. 2011. “Eggs-Ploiting Women: A Critical Feminist Analysis of the Different Principles in Transplant and Fertility Tourism.” In “Symposium: Cross-Border Reproductive Care—Ethical, Legal, and Socio-Cultural Perspectives,” special issue, Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 634-41. Phillips,
Anne. 2013. “Does the Body Make a Difference?” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 143-56. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ploeg, Irma van der. 2001. Prosthetic Bodies: The Construction of the Fetus and the Couple as Patients in Reproductive Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Rabinów, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. 2006. “Biopower Today.” BioSocieties 1 (2): 195-217. Rachman, Gideon. 2022. “Understanding Vladimir Putin, the Man Who Fooled the World.” The Guardian, April 9. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ apr/09/understanding-vladimir-putin-the-man-who-fooled-the-world. Radaev, Vadim. 2004. “How Trust Is Established in Economic Relationships When Institutions and Individuals Are Not Trustworthy: The Case of Russia.” In Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition, edited by János Komai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, 91-110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Radin, Margaret Jane. 1987. “Market-Inalienability.” Harvard Law Review 100 (8): 1849-1937. ------. 2005. “Contested Commodities.” In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, edited by Martha Μ. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, 81-95. New York: New York University Press. Radkowska-Walkowicz, Magdalena. 2012. “The Creation of‘Monsters’: The Discourse of Opposition to in Vitro Fertilization in Poland.” Reproductive Health Matters 20 (40): 30-37. Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder: Westview Press. ------ . 1996. “Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers and Fathers.”
American Ethnologist 23 (2): 352-65. RAHR (Russian Association of Human Reproduction). 2016. Registr VRT: Yubileynyj 20j Ochyotza 2014 God. https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/registr_BRT_ RARCH16.pdf.
272 REFERENCES ------. 2017. Registr VRT: Ochyot za 2015 God. https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/ RegistrVRT_2015 .pdf. ------. 2021. Registr VRT: Ochyot za 2019 God. http://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/ RegistrART2019.pdf. Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge. Readings, Jennifer, Lucy Blake, Polly Casey, Vasanti Jadva, and Susan Golombok. 2011. “Secrecy, Disclosure and Everything in-between: Decisions of Parents of Children Conceived by Donor Insemination, Egg Donation and Surrogacy.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 22 (5): 485-95. Rehsmann, Julia. 2018. “Exciting Waiting: Exploring Liver Transplantation in Germany.” Medicine Anthropology Theory 5 (1). http.7/www.medanthrotheory. org/article/view/5373. Reiter, Svetlana, and Kevin Rothrock. 2020. “The Invention of ‘Gay Mutilators.’ ” Meduza, October 5. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/05/ the֊invention-of-gay-mutilators. Remington, Thomas F. 2011. The Politics of Inequality in Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reuters. 2022. “Russia Moves to Bar Foreigners from Using Its Surrogate Mothers.” May 24. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-moves-barforeigners-using-its-surrogate-mothers-2022-05-24/. RIA Novosti. 2013. “Surrogatnoe materinstvo.” October 7. https://ria. ru/20131007/968214798.html. Richard, Analiese, and Daromir Rudnyckyj. 2009. “Economies of Affect.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (1): 57-77. Riggs, Damien W. 2016. “Narratives of Choice amongst White Australians Who Undertake Surrogacy
Arrangements in India.” Journal ofMedical Humanities 37 (3): 313-25. Riggs, Damien W., and Clare Bartholomaeus. 2016. “The Desire for a Child among a Sample of Heterosexual Australian Couples.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 34 (5): 442-50. ------. 2018. “‘It’s Just What You Do’: Australian Middle-Class Heterosexual Couples Negotiating Compulsory Parenthood.” Feminism Psychology 28 (3): 373-89. Riggs, Damien W., and Clemence Due. 2013. “Representations of Reproductive Citizenship and Vulnerability in Media Reports of Offshore Surrogacy.” Citizenship Studies 17 (8): 956-69. ------. 2017. “Constructions of Gay Men’s Reproductive Desires on Commercial Surrogacy Clinic Websites.” In Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction, edited by Miranda Davis, 33-45. London: Zed Books. Ritter, Martina. 2001. “Müttermacht im Patriarchat—Geschlechterverhältnisse ín Rußland.” In Zivilgesellschaft und Gender-Politik in Rußland, edited by Martina Ritter, 21-40. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag. Rivkin-Fish, Michele. 2003. “Anthropology, Demography, and the Search for a Critical Analysis of Fertility: Insights from Russia.” American Anthropologist 105 (2): 289-301. ------. 2004. “ ‘Change Yourself and the Whole World Will Become Kinder’: Russian Activists for Reproductive Health and the Limits of Claims Making for Women.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18 (3): 281-304.
REFERENCES 273 ------. 2005. Women’s Health in Post-Soviet Russia: The Politics ofIntervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ------. 2009. “Tracing Landscapes of the Past in Class Subjectivity: Practices of Memory and Distinction in Marketizing Russia.” American Ethnologist 36 (1): 79-95. ------. 2010. “Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of‘Maternity Capital.”’ Slavic Review 69 (3): 701-24. ------. 2011. “Learning the Moral Economy of Commodified Health Care: ‘Community Education,’ Failed Consumers, and the Shaping of Ethical Clinician-Citizens.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 35 (2): 183-208. ------. 2013. “Conceptualizing Feminist Strategies for Russian Reproductive Politics: Abortion, Surrogate Motherhood, and Family Support after Socialism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3): 569-93. ------. 2018. “‘Fight Abortion, Not Women’: The Moral Economy Underlying Russian Feminist Advocacy.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 27 (2): 22-44. Rivkin-Fish, Michele, and Cassandra Hartblay. 2014. “When Global LGBTQ Advocacy Became Entangled with New Cold War Sentiment: A Call for Examining Russian Queer Experience.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 21 (1): 95-111. Roache, Madeline. 2018. “Ukraine’s ‘Baby Factories’: The Human Cost of Surrogacy.” AI Jazeera, September 13. https://www.aljazeera.eom/features/2018/9/13/ ukraines-baby-factories-the-human-cost-of-surrogacy. Robben, Antonius C. G. Μ. 2012. “The Politics of Truth and Emotion among Victims and Perpetrators of
Violence.” In Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader, edited by Antonius C. G. Μ. Robben and Jeffrey A. Sluka, 175-90. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Roberts, Celia. 2007. Messengers of Sex: Hormones, Biomedicine, and Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roberts, Elizabeth. 2006. “God’s Laboratory: Religious Rationalities and Modernity in Ecuadorian in Vitro Fertilization.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30 (4): 507-36. ROC (Russian Orthodox Church). 2000. The Basis of the Social Concept. https://old. mospat.ru/en/documents/social-concepts/ . Rogoża, Jadwiga. 2021. “The Pandemic Takes Its Toll: Russia’s Demographic Crisis.” OSW Centre for Eastern Studies, February 16. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2021-02-16/ pandemic-takes-its-toll-russias-demographic-crisis. Rose, Nikolas. 2004. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Roth, Andrew. 2020. “Up to 1,000 Babies Born to Surrogate Mothers Stranded in Russia.” The Guardian, July 29. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2020/ jul/29/up-to-lOOO-babies-born-to-surrogate-mothers-stranded-in-russia. Rotkirch, Anna, Anna Temkina, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2007. “Who Helps the Degraded Housewife? Comments on Vladimir Putin’s Demographic Speech.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (4): 349-57. Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2010. “Making India the ‘Mother Destination’: Outsourcing Labor to Indian Surrogates.” In
Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace, edited b’ Christine L. Williams and Kirsten Dellinger, 253-85. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
274 REFERENCES ------ . 2014. “Conceiving Fatherhood: Gay Men and Indian Surrogate Mothers.” In Globalized Fatherhood, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn, Wendy Chavkin, and JoséAlberto Navarro, 291-311. New York: Berghahn Books. ------ . 2016a. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press. ------ . 2016b. “Why India’s New Surrogacy Bill Is Bad for Women.” Huffington Post, August 26. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-indias-new-surrogacy-bill-isbad-for-women_b_57c075f9e4b0b01630de83ad. ------ . 2018. “Reproducing Dystopia: The Politics of Transnational Surrogacy in India, 2002-2015.” Critical Sociology 44 (7-8): 1087-1101. Rudrappa, Sharmila, and Caitlyn Collins. 2015. “Altruistic Agencies and Compassionate Consumers: Moral Framing of Transnational Surrogacy.” Gender Society 29 (6): 937-59. Salmenniemi, Suvi, and Maria Adamson. 2015. “New Heroines of Labour: Domesticating Post-Feminism and Neoliberal Capitalism in Russia.” Sociology 49 (1): 88-105. Sandel, Michael. 2009. Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ------ . 2013. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin Books. Sandelowski, Margarete. 1991. “Compelled to Try: The Never-·Enough Quality of Conceptive Technology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 5 (1): 29-47. Sandelowski, Margarete, and Sheryl De Lacey. 2002. “The Uses of a ‘Disease’: Infertility as Rhetorical Vehicle.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, edited by Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van
Balen, 33-51. Berkeley: University of California Press. Sanger, Eva. 2020. Elternwerden zwischen “Babyfernsehen” und medizinischer Überwachung: Eine Ethnografie pränataler Ultraschalluntersuchungen. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1985. “Culture, Scarcity, and Maternal Thinking: Maternal Detachment and Infant Survival in a Brazilian Shantytown.” Ethos 13 (4): 291-317. Schultz, Susanne. 2015. “Reproducing the Nation: The New German Population Policy and the Concept of Demographization.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (3): 337-61. Schurr, Carolin. 2017. “From Biopolitics to Bioeconomies: The ART of (Re-)Producing White Futures in Mexico’s Surrogacy Market.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (2): 241-62. ------ . 2019. “Multiple Mobilities in Mexico’s Fertility Industry.” Mobilities 14 (1): 103-19. Schurr, Carolin, and Elisabeth Militz. 2018. “The Affective Economy of Transnational Surrogacy.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (8): 1626-45. Schwirtz, Michael, Maria Varenikova, and Rick Gladstone. 2022. “Putin Calls Ukrainian Statehood a Fiction: History Suggests Otherwise.” New York Times, February 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/world/europe/putinukraine.html. Shalev, Carmel. 1989. Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Sharp, Lesley A. 2000. “The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts.” Annual Review ofAnthropology 29 (1): 287-328.
REFERENCES 275 Shchurko, Tatsiana. 2017. “Women’s Health—Nation’s Health: The Policies of Reproduction in Post-Soviet Belarus.” In Gender Panic, Gender Policy, edited by Vasilikie Demos and Marcia Texler Segal, 24:45-66. Advances in Gender Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. Shenfield, F., J. de Mouzon, Guido Pennings, A. P. Ferraretti, A. Nyboe Andersen, G. de Wert, V. Goossens, and ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care. 2010. “Cross Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries.” Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1361-68. Siegl, Veronika. 2015. “Märkte der guten Hoffnung.” PROKLA: Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 45 (178): 99-115. https://www.prokla.de/index.php/ PROKLA/article/view/231. ------. 2018a. “Aligning the Affective Body: Commercial Surrogacy in Moscow and the Emotional Labour of‘Nastraivatsya.’” Tsantsa: Journal of the Swiss Anthropological Association 23: 63-72. ------. 2018b. “The Ultimate Argument: Evoking the Affective Powers of‘Happiness’ in Commercial Surrogacy.” Anthropological Journal ofEuropean Cultures 27 (2): 1-21. ------. 2018c. “Zehn Monate I Ten Months.” In hope, edited by Sarah Hildebrand, 41-63. Basel: Christoph Merian Verlag, https://www.merianverlag.ch/produkt/ fotografíe/hope/b79ed4db-c980-4e41-b450-el3b75244e8e.html. ------. 2019. “There’s a Crack in Everything. Or: How Leonard Cohen Inspired My Research on Commercial Surrogacy.” Medicine Anthropology Theory 6(1). http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5371/7356. ------. 2022. “Die ‘Leihmütter’ der Ukraine: Wer bestimmt über den schwangeren Körper?” GeN-
ethisches Netzwerk, March 22. https://gen-ethisches-netzwerk.de/ maerz-2022/die-leihmuetter-der-ukraine. Siegl, Veronika, Carolin Schurr, Laura Perler, Christine Bigler, and Tina Büchler. 2022. “Transnationale reproduktive Mobilität - empirische Befunde zu einer umstrittenen Praxis.” URPP Human Reproduction Reloaded, Working Paper 3. Zürich: Seismo, https://doi.org/10.33058/wpuzh.2022.8865. Simoni, Valerio. 2016. “Economization, Moralization, and the Changing Moral Economies of‘Capitalism’ and ‘Communism’ among Cuban Migrants in Spain.” Anthropological Theory 16 (4): 454-75. Śmietana, Marcin. 2017a. “‘Families Like We’d Always Known’? Spanish Gay Fathers’ Normalization Narratives in Transnational Surrogacy.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 49-60. New York: Routledge. ------. 2017b. “Affective De-Commodifying, Economic De-Kinning: Surrogates’ and Gay Fathers’ Narratives in U.S. Surrogacy.” Sociological Research Online 22 (2): 163-75. ------ . 2018. “Procreative Consciousness in a Global Market: Gay Men’s Paths to Surrogacy in the USA.” Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online 7:101-11. Śmietana, Marcin, Sharmila Rudrappa, and Christina Weis. 2021. “Moral Frameworks of Commercial Surrogacy within the US, India and Russia.” Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 29 (1): 1-17. Smyth, Regina, and Irina Soboleva. 2014. “Looking beyond the Economy: Pussy Riot and the Kremlin’s Voting Coalition.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (4): 257-75. Soboleva, Irina V, and Yaroslav A.
Bakhmetjev. 2015. “Political Awareness and Self Blame in the Explanatory Narratives of LGBT People amid the Anti-LGBT Campaign in Russia.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 275-96.
276 REFERENCES Spar, Debora. 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. ------. 2010. “Free Markets, Free Choice? A Market Approach to Reproductive Rights.” In Baby Markets: Money and the New Politics of Creating Families, edited by Michele Goodwin, 177-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Speier, Amy. 2011. “Brokers, Consumers and the Internet: How North American Consumers Navigate Their Infertility Journeys.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 592-99. ------. 2016. Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press. Speier, Amy, Kristin Lozański, and Susan Frohlick. 2020. “Reproductive Mobilities.” Mobilities 15 (2): 107-19. Sputnik. 2013. “Most Russians Say Surrogate Motherhood Acceptable - Survey.” December 19. https://sputniknews.com/20131219/Most-Russians-SaySurrogate-Motherhood-Acceptable-Survey-185736619.html . Starza-Allen, Antony. 2016. “Council of Europe Rejects Surrogacy Guidelines.” BioNews (blog), October 18. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95737. Strasser, Sabine, and Luisa Piart. 2018. “Intimate Uncertainties.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 27 (2): v-xv. Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------. 1992b. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Stuvøy, Ingvill. 2018. “Accounting for the Money-Made Parenthood of
Transnational Surrogacy.” Anthropology Medicine 25 (3): 280-95. Sudakov, Dmitry. 2011a. “Market of Surrogate Motherhood Grows Like a Weed.” Pravda, January 20. https://english.pravda.ru/ society/116585 -surrogate_motherhood/. ------ . 201 lb. “Surrogacy: A Form of Female Slavery?” Pravda, December 1. https:// english.pravda.ru/society/119805-surrogate_motherhood/. Svitnev, Konstantin. 2006. “The Right to Life (ART, Surrogate Motherhood and Demographics).” The Scientific Expert Magazine 1: n.p. ------ . 2007. ART Regulations in Russia and Elsewhere, http://www.jurconsult.ru/en/ publications/art_regulations_in_russia_and_elsewhere/. Accessed July 3,2014 (no longer available). ------ . 2012. “New Russian Legislation on Assisted Reproduction.” Open Access Scientific Reports 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.207. ------. 2016. “Gestational Surrogacy in the Russian Federation.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, edited by E. Scott Sills, 232-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Swader, Christopher S. 2013. The Capitalist Personality: Face-to-Face Sociality and Economic Change in the Post-Communist World. New York: Routledge. Swader, Christopher S., and Vaida Obelene. 2015. “Post-Soviet Intimacies: An Introduction.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 245-55. Swader, Christopher S., Olga Strelkova, Alena Sutormina, Viktoria Syomina, Volha Vysotskaya, and Irene Fedorova. 2013. “Love as a Fictitious Commodity: Giftfor-Sex Barters as Contractual Carriers of Intimacy.” Sexuality Culture 17 (4): 598-616. Swader,
Christopher S., and Irina D. Vorobeva. 2015. “Receiving Gifts for Sex in Moscow, Kyiv, and Minsk: A Compensated Dating Survey.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 321-48.
REFERENCES 277 Tarabrin, Roman. 2020. “Orthodox Perspectives on in Vitro Fertilization in Russia.” Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality 26 (2): 177-204. TASS. 2020. “Key Suspect in Russian Baby Trafficking Case Put on Wanted List.” July 19. https://tass.com/emergencies/1180171. ----- . 2021. “Russia to Grant Citizenship to Children Born through Surrogacy for Foreigners—Bill.” June 11. https://tass.com/society/1301807. ----- . 2022. “Decision Taken on Denazification, Demilitarization of Ukraine—Putin.” February 23. https://tass.com/politics/1409189. Teman, Elly. 2003. “The Medicalization of‘Nature’ in the ‘Artificial Body’: Surrogate Motherhood in Israel.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (1): 78-98. ----- . 2008. “The Social Construction of Surrogacy Research: An Anthropological Critique of the Psychosocial Scholarship on Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Science Medicine 67 (7): 1104-12. ----- . 2009. “Embodying Surrogate Motherhood: Pregnancy as a Dyadic BodyProject.” Body Society 15 (3): 47-69. ----- . 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley: University of California Press. ----- . 2019. “The Power of the Single Story: Surrogacy and Social Media in Israel.” Medical Anthropology 38 (3): 282-94. Teman, Elly, and Zsuzsa Berend. 2018. “Surrogate Non-Motherhood: Israeli and US Surrogates Speak about Kinship and Parenthood.” Anthropology Medicine 25 (3): 296-310. ----- . 2021. “Surrogacy as a Family Project: How Surrogates Articulate Familial Identity and Belonging.” Journal of Family Issues 42 (6): 1143-65. Temkina,
Anna. 2010. “Childbearing and Work-Family Balance among Contemporary Russian Women.” Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 45: 83-101. Temkina, Anna, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2015. “The Sexual Scripts and Identity of Middle-Class Russian Women.” Sexuality Culture 19 (2): 297-320. ----- . 2018. “Responsible Motherhood, Practices of Reproductive Choice and Class Construction in Contemporary Russia.” In Gender and Choice after Socialism, edited by Lynne Attwood, Elisabeth Schimpfössl, and Marina Yusupova, 161-86. Cham: Springer International. Teschlade, Julia. 2019. “‘Wenn das liebe Geld nicht wär’: Zur Konstruktion von Intimität zwischen Tragemüttern und gleichgeschlechtlichen Männerpaaren.” Feministische Studien 37 (1): 65-81. Teschlade, Julia, and Almut Peukert. 2019. “Creating a Family through Surrogacy: Negotiating Parental Positions, Familial Boundaries and Kinship Practices.” GENDER: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft lì (2): 56-70. Tétrault-Farber, Gabrielle. 2014. “Russian Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Commercial Surrogate Motherhood.” Moscow Times, April 24. http://www.themoscowtimes. com/2014/04/24/russian-lawmaker-proposes-ban-on-commerciaI-surrogatemotherhood-a34637. Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Thompson, Edward P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past Present 50: 76-136. Tickle, Jonny. 2020a. “Reproduce or Pay Up! Controversial Russian Communist Politician Backs Childlessness Tax on Citizens Who
Don’t Want to Have Kids.” Russia Today, October 14. https://www.rt.com/ russia/503490-childnessness-payment-tax-russia/.
278 REFERENCES ------. 2020b. “Russian MP Zhirinovsky Suggests Government Offer Money to Discourage Women from Abortion, to Help Alleviate Demographic Crisis.” Russia Today, December 24. https://www.rt.com/russia/510618-zhirinovskymoney-discourage-abortion/. Ticktin, Miriam. 2013. “The Waiting Room.” Somatosphere (blog), October 28. http:// somatosphere.net/2013/the-waiting-room.html/. Tkach, Olga. 2009. “Making Family and Unmaking Kin in the Russian Media: Reproductive Technologies and Relatedness.” In Making Bodies, Persons and Families: Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany, edited by Willemijn de Jong and Olga Tkach, 135-57. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Tober, Diane. 2018. Romancing the Sperm. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Tober, Diane, and Charlotte Halmø Kroløkke. 2021. “Emotion, Embodiment, and Reproductive Colonialism in the Global Human Egg Trade.” Gender, Work Organization 28 (5): 1766-86. Toledano, Sarah Jane, and Kristin Zeiler. 2017. “Hosting the Others’ Child? Relational Work and Embodied Responsibility in Altruistic Surrogate Motherhood.” Feminist Theory 18 (2): 159-75. Torocheshnikova, Maryana. 2021. “‘Torgovlya deťmi’ и ‘delo reproduktologov.’” Radio Svoboda, July 15. https://www.svoboda.Org/a/31360422.html. Tronto, Joan C. 1994. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. London: Routledge. Tronto, Joan, and Berenice Fischer. 1990. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson, 36-54. Albany: State
University of New York Press. Trubina, Elena. 2012. “Class Differences and Social Mobility amongst CollegeEducated Young People in Russia.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 203-20. Farnham: Ashgate. Tsing, Anna. 2013. “Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 21-43. Tuller, David. 1996. Cracks in the Iron Closet: Travels in Gay Lesbian Russia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Turbine, Vikki, and Kathleen Riach. 2012. “The Right to Choose or Choosing What’s Right? Women’s Conceptualizations of Work and Life Choices in Contemporary Russia.” Gender, Work Organization 19 (2): 165-87. Twine, France Winddance. 2011. Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. New York: Routledge. United Nations, OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights). 1989. “Convention on the Rights of the Child.” November 20. https://www.ohchr.org/ en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Utrata, Jennifer. 2015. Women without Men: Single Mothers and Family Change in the New Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Vaughn, Richard. 2020. “Is Sperm Donor Anonymity a Thing of the Past?” International Fertility Law Group (blog), October 30. https://www.iflg.net/ is-sperm-donor-anonymity-a-thing-of-the-past/. Verdery, Katherine. 2013. “From Parent-State to Family Patriarchs: Gender and Nation in Contemporary Eastern Europe.” In Eastern Europe: Women in Transition, edited by Irena Grudzinska-Gross and Andrzej W. Tymowski, 15-44. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang
Verlag.
REFERENCES 279 Vertommen, Sigrid. 2016. “Babies from Behind Bars: Stratified Assisted Reproduction in Palestine/Israel.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 207-18. New York: Routledge. Vertommen, Sigrid, and Camille Barbagallo. 2021. “The In/Visible Wombs of the Market: The Dialectics of Waged and Unwaged Reproductive Labour in the Global Surrogacy Industry.” Review of International Political Economy, January, 1-41. Vitebsky, Piers. 1993. “Is Death the Same Everywhere? Contexts of Knowing and Doubting.” In An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, edited by Mark Hobart, 100-115. London: Routledge. Vlasenko, Polina. 2014. “Governing through Precarity: The Experience of Infertile Bodies in IVF Treatment in Ukraine.” Journal of Social Policy Studies 12 (3): 441-54. ------ . 2015. “Desirable Bodies/Precarious Laborers: Ukrainian Egg Donors in Context of Transnational Fertility.” In (In)Fertile Citizens: Anthropological and Legal Challenges ofAssisted Reproduction Technologies, edited by Venetia Kantsa, Giulia Zanini, and Lina Papadopoulou, 197-216. Athens: (In)FERCIT. ------ . 2020. “Ukraine’s Surrogate Mothers Struggle under Quarantine.” OpenDemocracy, June 10. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/ ukraines-surrogate-mothers-struggle-under-quarantine/. ------ . 2021. “Global Circuits of Fertility: The Political Economy of the Ukrainian Ova Market.” PhD thesis, Indiana University. Vora, Kalindi. 2009. “Indian Transnational Surrogacy and
the Commodification of Vital Energy.” Subjectivity 28 (1): 266-78. ------ . 2013. “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy.” Current Anthropology 54 (S7): S97-106. Vora, Kalindi, and Malathi Michelle Iyengar. 2017. “Citizen, Subject, Property: Indian Surrogacy and the Global Fertility Market.” In Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, edited by Merete Lie and Nina Lykke, 25-35. New York: Routledge. Walker, Charles. 2012. “Re-inventing Themselves? Gender, Employment and Subjective Well-being amongst Young Working-Class Russians.” In Rethinking Class in Russia, edited by Suvi Salmenniemi, 221-40. Farnham: Ashgate. Waldby, Catherine, and Melinda Cooper. 2008. “The Biopolitics of Reproduction: Post-Fordist Biotechnology and Women’s Clinical Labour.” Australian Feminist Studies 23 (55): 57-73. Weis, Christina. 2015. “Workers or Mothers? The Business of Surrogacy in Russia.” Open Democracy, December 15. https://www.opendemocracy.net/ beyondslavery/christina-weis/workers-or-mothers-business-of-surrogacy-inrussia. ------ . 2021a. Surrogacy in Russia: An Ethnography of Reproductive Labour, Stratification and Migration. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. ------ . 2021b. “Changing Fertility Landscapes: Exploring the Reproductive Routes and Choices of Fertility Patients from China for Assisted Reproduction in Russia.” Asian Bioethics Review 13(1): 7-22. Weis, Christina, and Maria Kirpichenko. 2022. “The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Russian Fertility Industry.” BioNews (blog), April
4. https://www.bionews. org.uk/page_163451. Whittaker, Andrea. 2019. International Surrogacy as Disruptive Industry in Southeast Asia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
280 REFERENCES Wichterich, Christa. 2018. “Transnational Reconfigurations of Re/Production and the Female Body: Bioeconomics, Motherhoods and the Case of Surrogacy in India.” In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care, edited by Chiristine Bauhardt and Wendy Harcourt, 211-29. New York: Routledge. Widdows, Heather. 2013. “Rejecting the Choice Paradigm: Ethical Framework of Prostitution and Egg Sale.” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 157-80. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Williams, Joan C., and Viviana A. Zelizer. 2005. “To Commodify or Not to Commodify: That Is Not the Question.” In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, edited by Martha Μ. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, 362-82. New York: New York University Press. Wilson, Kalpana. 2008. “Reclaiming Agency, Reasserting Resistance.” IDS Bulletin 39 (6): 83-91. ------ . 2013. “Agency as ‘Smart Economics’: Neoliberalism, Gender and Development.” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson, 84-101. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. Yasakova, Ekaterina. 2021. “Nye primut u chastnykh: Surrogatnow materinstvo predlozhili perevesti v goskliniki.” Izvestia, August 16. https://iz.ru/1207641/ ekaterina-iasakova/ne-primut-u-chastnykh-surrogatnoe-materinstvo predlozhili-perevesti-v-goskliniki. Yurchak, Alexei. 2003. “Russian Neoliberal: The Entrepreneurial Ethic and the Spirit of ‘True Careerism.’” Russian Review 62 (1): 72-90. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publishing. Zatari, Amalia. 2020. “‘My dazhe nye znaem, zhiv li on’: SKR zayel delo o torgovle dyeťmi, ikh roditeli prosyat pomoshch u Putina.” BBC, October 9. https://www. bbc.com/russian/features-54468421 . Zelizer, Viviana A. 2013. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zhurzhenko, Tatiana. 2012. “Mothering the Nation: Demographic Politics, Gender and Parenting in Ukraine.” In Gendering Post-Socialist Transition: Studies ofChanging Gender Perspectives, edited by Krassimira Daskalova, Caroline Hornstein Tomic, Karl Kaser, and Filip Radunović, 285-302. Vienna: LIT Verlag. Ziff, Elizabeth. 2017. “‘The Mommy Deployment’: Military Spouses and Surrogacy in the United States.” Sociological Forum 32 (2): 406-25. ------ . 2019. “‘Honey, I Want to Be a Surrogate’: How Military Spouses Negotiate and Navigate Surrogacy with Their Service Member Husbands.” Journal of Family Issues 40 (18): 2774-2800. ------ . 2020. “Surrogacy and Medicalization: Navigating Power, Control, and Autonomy in Embodied Labor.” Sociological Quarterly 62 (3): 510-27. Zigon, Jarrett. 2009. “Developing the Moral Person: The Concepts of Human, Godmanhood, and Feelings in Some Russian Articulations of Morality.” Anthropology of Consciousness 20 (1): 1-26. ------. 2011. “A Moral and Ethical Assemblage in Russian Orthodox Drug Rehabilitation.” Ethos 39 (1): 30-50.
Index abortion as alleged reason for infertility, 35, 79 bodily autonomy and, 193,196 compensation and, 106-107 opposition to, 40,189 screening process and, 86 adoption, 40-42,179,202,230 advertising, 95-97,99,171 affect aliens, 143 affect/emotions hormones and maternal instinct and, 143, 149-155 individualization and, 160-161 affective de-commodification, 166,191 affective labor, 168-169,171,174-175, 185-186,191 affective understanding, 222 agencies as protection, 123-128 see also individual agencies agents, interviews with, 25 Ahmed, Sara, 143,167-168,187 Albania, 238 Aleksandra Denisovna, 76-77,114-115, 183 alienation, 134 alignment, technologies of, 136-161 alimony, 92 Alisa Serafimovna, 34,41,44-47,53,56, 70-71, 74,79,128-130 Altra Vita IVF Clinic, 19-25,83-85, 104, 106-109,144 altruism, 113,130,166,177,180,183-184 Alyona Timofeyevna, 66,182-183,201, 203-211,213-215,221 Amapola, 173-174,188 American Society of Reproductive Medicine, 252nll Anastasia Anatolyevna, 118,126,159 anonymity, 31,69,72,85,128,133-134,220, 231-232 “Anthem” (Cohen), 217 antipolitics machine, 160 Anton Feodorovich, 75-77,117 anxiety about pregnancy outcomes, 105-106 Arendt, Hannah, 15-16 Ashwin, Sarah, 37 assisted reproductive technologies (ART) agencies and, 32 development of, 5,12 disinformation regarding children born via, 60-62,64 overview of research on, 7-9 public discourse on, 5 attachment emotional articulation and, 157-158 lack of, 143 Baby Gammy, 6-7,225 Baby Μ case, 194-195 Bakhmetjev, Yaroslav, 69 ban, call for, 198-199 Baranov, Alexander, 61 Basis of the Social Concept, The (ROC),
35,60 Becker, Gay, 76 Bell, Kirsten, 218 bellies, strap-on, 56,70-71 Belyakov, Anton, 60 Berend, Zsuzsa, 9 Bharadwaj, Aditya, 103 biopolitical turn, 17,57, 59,63-64 biopower, 32,53 BioTexCom, 171-175,224-227,232,236-239, 249Ո10 birth rates, 38-40 blackmail, 121,125 Blanco, Sara, 170,179-180,182 body maps, 145 bonding, between surrogate and child, 136-137,143-144 Bourdieu, Pierre, 201 Cabello, Alberto, 169-170, 190 Cambodia, 7 capitalism, 54,180, 189-199 capriciousness, 122-124 care, ethics of, 57-58, 79-80 281
282 INDEX caring communities, 187 Catholic Church, 57,62 Center of Medical Statistics, Ministry of Health (Ukraine), 249n9 chance, element of, 101-102 child trafficking, allegations of, 14,225, 228-229,237-238 China/Chinese parents, 225,227-228,236 choreographing surrogacy, 83-111 class, 52-54,170 coercion critique, 6,191 Cohen, Lawrence, 197 Cohen, Leonard, 217 Collins, Caitlyn, 9,198 commissions, 100 commodities, gifts versus, 134 compensated dating, 94-96 constructing phrases, 74 contact, restriction of, 125-128,146 contracts, 13,86,106-107, 111, 132,208-209 Cooper, Melinda, 117 Corea, Gena, 6 corruption critique, 6,191 cosmopolitanism, 63 costs of surrogacy, 11-12,52, 96,100-101, 180-181 Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 209 couvade-like practices, 78 COVID-19 pandemic, 224,228,236,251n7 cravings, 122-123 “crystal vase” metaphor, 84,101,105,107,110 C-sections, 206-207 “culturedness,” 65 cutting ties, 134-135 Cyprus, 238 Czech Republic, 203 deep acting, 168 delegitimization of critique, 222 deliveries, 149-150,153-154, 160 Delmonte, Ricardo, 124,185, 187 demographic crisis, discourse of, 32, 36-40, 51,54 Deomampo, Daisy, 106 dependency, mutual, 219 detachment, 113-114,143-144 Diliara Eduardovna, 120-121 Dima Yakovlev Law, 229-230 Dimitri Anatolyevich, 35-36,43,63, 71 Dina Antonovna, 34,48,52,65,68-70 direct arrangements, 24-25,95, 127-129, 132, 147-148,158 disclosure to children, 74-76,80 discrimination, 73-74,92,189,211-212 “dis-emotionalizing,” 160 diversity among surrogates, 21-22 divorce due to infertility, 34 doctors, interviews with, 25.
see ako individual doctors Donbass republics, 235 donor conception, 41 double bind, 198-201 dyadic body-project, 78 “echo chambers,” 186 economic imbalance/inequality, 4-5,54,92 economies of affect, 168 egg providers, 90,100,104,200 embodied labor, 119 embryo donations, 226 embryo transfers, 86-87,101 emotional entanglements, prevention of, 133 emotional labor, 137-143,145,158-159, 168 emptiness, feelings of, 149-150,152,155-156, 160 Ertman, Martha, 192 Essig, Laurie, 69 ethical labor, 3,10, 15-16,57-58 ethics, 15 ethnography, definition of, 23 ethnonationalism, 39,51,54 European Council, 7,223 European Court of Human Rights, 129 European Parliament, 223 experience, benefits and disadvantages of, 121 exploitation, 95-96,165-166,170,191,195, 212,214 Facebook, 186 Family Code of the Russian Federation, 13,120 Family Code of Ukraine, 14 Fassin, Didier, 10 Federal Laws and Orders (Russia), 13 feeling rules, 137-138,159,168,218 feminist criticism, 6-7,193-196 Ferguson, James, 160 fertilization process, 86-87 fieldwork access difficulties, 16-20 clinic fieldwork, 84-88 definition of ethnography, 23 overview of research, 25 financial struggles, 52 FINRRAGE (Feminist Interventional Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering), 6 Firestone, Shulamith, 6
INDEX Fischer, Berenice, 79-80 Flatley, Jonathan, 144 Førde, Kristin Engh, 16 forgetting about surrogacy, 77-79 foster care, 202 Foucault, Michel, 15,32,53,137 fragmentation of “motherhood,” 5-6 fraud, 119-120 free choice, 166-167, 193-194,215-216 freedom, ambivalences of, 193-216 fridge metaphor, 116 Frolov v. Suzdaleva, 252nl Fuentes, Alvaro, 125, 185,187,199-201 Gal, Susan, 67 Galkin, Maksim, 58 Galya Yanovna, 33,41,47,52,64,66-67,70-71, 74,77-78,120,122,130 gay men/couples, 14,49-50,175-178,211-212, 228-230. see also LGBTQI+ community Gay Propaganda Law, 63-64,175,229 gender differences, 54 gender roles/norms, 36-38 gendered altruism, 166 gendered empowerment, 166,194 genetic links absence of, 129,139-140, 143 importance of, 41-42,44 intent and, 139-140 requirements involving, 13 genetics, fragmentation and, 5-6 Georgia, 227,238 gestational surrogacy, 5 gifts/gift metaphor, 134,197-198 Goffman, Erving, 168 Gorbachev, Mikhail, 38 grief, 157 group attitudes, 144 Guseva, Alya, 49,225-226 habitus, 201 happiness finding, 191-192 as human right, 187-191 narratives of, 166-167 promise of, 167-169,171 “happy objects,” 136 Hardt, Michael, 168 Hauser, David and Christoph, 175-179, 218-219 Heidegger, Martin, 144 Held, Virginia, 80 heroism, maternal, 44-48 Hildebrand, Sarah, 109 283 Hochschild, Arlie, 137,168 Hoeyer, Klaus, 209-210 Hogle, Linda F., 209-210 homophobia, 60 hope, 46,48 hormonal stimulation, 86-87, 104 hormones, risk and, 122,124 housing, 107-110 ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), 251n5 income inequality, 92 incubator metaphor, 116 indebtedness, feelings of,
133-134 indexical recalibration, 67-68 India comparison with, 5,140,144,161,174,220 costs of surrogacy in, 12 economic factors and, 197-199 economic motives and, 89 ethical work and, 16 exploitation and, 170,191 gay men/couples and, 7-8,175,254n3 housing in, 107 invisibility of surrogate and, 127,134-135 “mother-worker” and, 118 negative pregnancy outcomes and, 103,106, 157 neocolonialism and, 169 private agents and, 100 restrictions in, 226 infantilization, 123,131 infertility as disability, 31,53 divorce due to, 34 male, 43,251n5 as medical issue, 49-50,53 ROC on, 35-36 as self-inflicted, 35,79 as women’s problem, 43 infertility psychologists, interviews with, 25 informed consent, 209-210,214-216 Inhorn, Marcia, 43 insurance, 208-209 intended parents deliveries and, 153-154 direct arrangements and, 147-148 interviews with, 25 lack of contact with, 146-149,159 Russian invasion of Ukraine and, 236-238 see also individual parents intent, importance of, 139 Internet, role of, 24-25,69-70 interviews, overview of, 25-26 intimate economies, 195
284 INDEX intimate labor, definition of, 4 inviTRA International Fertility Fair, 1,24,169, 233 Isupova, Olga, 64-65,68 IVF, uncertainty and, 103 Katya Yefimovna, 21,42, 72,90-93,100, 108-110,123,138, 146-147,149-152, 155-156,158-161 Kauffert, Patricia, 53 Kay, Rebecca, 38 Kazakhstan, 227 Khvorostyanov, Natalia, 96 Kierans, Ciara, 218 Kirill, Patriarch, 59 Kirkorov, Philipp, 50-51,58 Kirpichenko, Maria, 184 Konstantin Pavlovich, 51,115-118,124-125, 128,156-158 Korolczuk, Elżbieta, 25ІПІ0 Korsak, Vladislav, 49 Kroløkke, Charlotte, 200 Kruglova, Anna, 74 Ksenia Demyanovna, 73,102-104 Laidlaw, James, 15 Lambek, Michael, 250nl5 Larissa Osipovna, 1-3,16,122,125-128, 133-134,161,222,233 lawyers, interviews with, 25. see also individual lawyers legislation adaptability and, 1-2 on disclosure, 75 gray areas in, 50 medical indication requirement and, 141 minimalistic, 188-189 proposals for, 226-227,230,232 in Russia and Ukraine, 11-15 see also regulation; individual laws legitimization, quests for, 47 Lena Mironovna, 21,72,79,89-90,93, 108-109, Ill, 115,132,138,146-147,149, 153-161,218-219 Levada Center, 58-59 Lewis, Sophie, 198 LGBTQI+ community, 69,229-230,254n6. see also gay men/couples lie detectors, 115 Lock, Margaret, 53 Lokshin, Vyacheslav, 49 Lustenberger, Sibylle, 135 Luzenko, Yuri, 225 lying, not telling versus, 67-68 Lyuba Dmitriyevna, 91,103,140-141,148-149 Makarychev, Andrey, 56-57 Maksim Antonov, 40-41,127 male infertility, 43,251n5 Malich, Lisa, 160 Marina Nikitichna, 139-140,143,145-146, 149,152 Marina Romanovna, 182-183, 206 Mariya Alexeyevna, 44,46,65-66 Markens,
Susan, 9,231 Martin, Emily, 117 Masha Arkadyevna, 99-100,105,120,124,132, 143-144,148,150-151,159 Masha Radionovna, 204-205,207-208 Maslennikova, Galina, 61 maternal rights legislation on, 120 payment tied to relinquishing, 13,106 Maternity Capital, 39 Matza, Tomas, 160-161 Mauss, Marcel, 134 Meddesk, 24, 56,95,131 media coverage, 9 mediated arrangements agencies’ role in, 123-124 direct versus, 24-25,95,158 Medvedev, Sergei, 56-57 men genetic links and, 42-44 lack of involvement of, 34,43 male infertility, 43,251n5 marital consent and, 141-142 single, 14,50-51,98,228-230 see also gay men/couples; individual men metaphorical thinking, 116-117,140 Mexico, 169-170,174,191,197 Mies, Maria, 6 Milonov, Vitaly, 60 “miracle stories,” 46-47 Mishtal, Joanna, 57 Mitra, Sayani, 157 Mizulina, Yelena, 60 modes of subjection, 137 Mohanty, Chandra, 195 monetary sanctions, 106-107 Monte, Pedro, 171,186 moods, 144 moral economy/economies, 10,24,26-27,94, 217,220
INDEX moral framings, 8-9 moral governance, 57,62,79 moral middle ground, 169-171, 175,193 mortality rates, 38 Mother-Heroines, 38 motherhood biopolitics of, 31-55 deserving, 47 importance of, 31-36 norm of, 32,40 pressures regarding, 33-34 state support for, 37-39 timing of, 33 “mother-worker,” 118-119 Motluk, Alison, 237 nanny metaphor, 140,143 Narotzky, Susana, 16 nastraivaťsya, 138-143 Natalya Nikolayevna, 112-113,117 Natasha Sergeyevna, 20,22,83-88,114, 122-123 nationalism, 36 naturalization of ART, 53-54 neoliberal discourses, 193 neoliberal subjects, 142 Nepal, 7,254n3 No Somos Vasijas (“We are not containers”), 7 Nordqvist, Petra, 75 Odnoklassniki, 95 Oksana Yevgenyevna, 71-72 Olessia Valeryevna, 31, 33-34,41-42,48, 52-53, 56,62,67-70, 73-74,76, 78-79, 121-122,129-130,135 Olga Georgyevna, 72, 144 online forums/platforms, 9,69-70,96,99 Oprah Winfrey Show, 198 Order of Maternal Glory (Russia), 38 Order of the Ministry of Health on Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Ukraine), 14 orphanages, 41-42 Ostrov Kenguru, 24,95 othering, 59-64 othering of surrogate child, 140-141 Pande, Amrita, 107,118-119,197,226 Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy, 129 Patel, Nayna, 198 Pático, Jennifer, 95 Pavel Viktorovich, 50-51 Payne, Gunnarsson, 251Ո10 285 Pérez, Marta, 126, 195, 197 “philanthrocapitalism,” 198 photographs, as evidence, 186-187 Poland, 57,62,251nl0 Polina Davidovna, 122-123 population decline, 38-39 postbirth narratives, 149-159 posthumous surrogacy, 12,58 poverty, exploitation and, 6,199-201 Power of Mothers, The, 232 practical realism, 92-93,104,146,215 pregnancies
anxiety about outcomes of, 105-106 element of chance in, 101-102 hiding, 71-73 simulated, 56,70-73, 77-78 visibility of, 70-73 “pregnant in the head,” 77-78 privacy, 17-18 private agents, 100 Probírka, 24,64,68-69, 95 “propaganda,” 63-64,76-77 psychological counseling, lack of, 157 psychological screening, 86,114-115 public opinion on surrogacy, 58-59 Pugacheva, Alla, 12,58 Pushkina, Oksana, 230 Pussy Riot, 59 Putin, Vladimir, 36-37, 39, 59,230,235,254n6 race, issues involving, 12 Radin, Margaret, 199 Ragoné, Helena, 139 Rapp, Rayna, 15 Raya Antonovna, 66,74,94-96,131,147-148, 160 reductions, 87,107 regime of truth, 27 regrets, 155-159,218 regulation lack of in Spain, 212-213 minimalistic, 188-189 see also legislation religion Catholic Church, 57, 62 uncertainty and, 103 see also Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) reproductive governance, 31-32,57 resemblance, as validating, 41 resistance, small acts of, 110-111 Riach, Kathleen, 93 “right understanding,” 3,117,143,221-222
286 INDEX Rita Tikhonovna, 33, 35,42, 52,66, 70,98-99, 102,130-132,147-148 Rivkin-Fish, Michele, 14,39,54,160-161 Robben, Antonius, 3 Roberts, Elizabeth, 32,103 Romania, 250nl Romero, Juan, 120,169-170,181-182,184,193, 196,211-212,216 Rose, Nikolas, 194 Rosjurconsulting, 227 Rudrappa, Sharmila, 9,15,127,134-135,187, 198 rules/guidelines during pregnancy, 84,105,107 Russian Association of Human Reproduction (RAHR), 12,16,49,230 Russian invasion of Ukraine, 235-239 Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) condemnation of surrogacy by, 71,73 criticism of, 230 growing influence of, 56 on infertility, 34-35,53 on motherhood, 36 political importance of, 17,32 push for surrogacy ban and, 60 Putin and, 59 role of, 79 Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), 58-59 salaries commissions from, 100 conversion rates for, xvi nationalities and, 100-101 terminations and, 106-107 timing of, 106-107 see also costs of surrogacy Sandel, Michael, 6 Schicktanz, Silke, 157 screening process, 86,114-115,199 secrecy, 5,17,25,56-80,113,161 selection criteria, surrogate, 13-14 selective reduction, 107 self technologies of, 137,168 work on, 142-143 self-commodification, 94,96 self-formation, 15 self-government, narratives of, 160 separate-spheres and hostile-worlds doctrine, 218 Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, 254n7 Sergej Petrovich, 49,53,118,127,157-158 sex selection, 189-190 Shalev, Carmel, 195 simulated pregnancies, 56, 70-73,77-78 single motherhood, 92-93 Smyth, Regina, 59 Soboleva, Irina, 59,69 Sokolova, Svetlana, 232 Sonya Vitalyevna, 88-89, 91, 93 Speier, Amy, 186 Stalin, Joseph,
38 Stop Surrogacy Now campaign, 7, 195,223 structural inequalities, 160-161 superstitions, 103 surrogacy costs of, 11-13,52,96,100-101,180-181 feminist positions toward, 6-7,193-196 forgetting about, 77-79 market, global, 1-2,8,16-170,224-227, 238-239 as medical solution, 48-50 number of children born through, 12,249n9, 249Ո10 public opinion on, 58-59 as work, 89,112-114,119,130,133-135,144, 220,232 Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill (India), 226 surrogates control of, 84,105,107,124-126 decisions to become, 94-101 description of perfect, 112 with experience, 121 first visits of, 85-86 “happy,” 182-187 inner alignment and, 138-143 interviews with, 87 invisibility of, 232,237 limited exchange among, 161 marital consent for, 141-142 motives of, 89-92,113,129-130,166,188, 196-197,199 questions from, 87-88 recruiting perfect, 114-119 riskiness and, 119-123 screening of, 86 see also individual surrogates surveillance, 108-109 Svitnev, Konstantin, 14, 51-52,54,189-190, 221,227-228 Swader, Christopher, 94-96 switch metaphor, 139,145,156,158-159 Tatyana Vasilyevna, 36,43,60-61,63-64,71, 136,140 Teman, Elly, 5,9,41,78,137,143,145,158 Temkina, Anna, 94
INDEX terminations, 106-107. see also abortion Teschlade, Julia, 177 testimonials, 184 Thailand, 6-7,170,191,220,225 “Third World Women,” 195 Thompson, Charis, 43,53 Thompson, Edward P., 10 Ticktin, Miriam, 108 Tkach, Olga, 251n7 Tochilovsky, Albert, 226 Tolstoy, Pyotr, 60,227,229 Torres, Diego, 180-181,195-197,212-213,216 transnational surrogacy arrangements, 6-8, 123-124,165-167,191 travelling donors, 104 Trisomy 21,6-7 Tronto, Joan, 79-80 trust, lack of, 18-19,64-66,128,130 truth fragile, 218-221 regimes of, 221-224 truth claims, 10-11 truth discourses, 57 truthfulness, 67-68 Tsing,Anna, 134 Tuller, David, 69 Turbine, Vikki, 93 Ukrainian Association for Reproductive Medicine (UARM), 226 uncertainty dealing with, 101-104 managing, 110-111 unenforceability of contracts, 13 United Russia, 59,227,230 287 United States, 169-171,177-179, 191,197,212, 220,254n7 Utrata, Jennifer, 40,92-93 Valeriy Ivanovich, 189,192 Venera Igorevna, 175-179 Vera Romanovna, 43,52,66,68,103,123 victim discourse, 127 visibility of pregnancies, 70-73 VittoriaVita, 184 Vkontakte, 95,155 Vlasenko, Polina, 33 Vora, Kalindi, 197 Vorobeva, Irina, 94-96 Wagner, Stefan and Teresa, 120,170,182-183, 201-211,213-214,216,221 Waldby, Catherine, 117 Weis, Christina, 22 “what if” sensibility, 74 Whittaker, Andrea, 10 Williams, Joan, 7 win-win argument, 196-197,201 World Health Organization, 209 Yakovenko, Sergej, 19-20,22-23 Yana Timurovna, 141,145 Yeshua-Katz, Daphna, 96 Yurchak, Alexei, 142 Yushchenko, Viktor, 37 Zdravomyslova, Elena, 94 Zelizer, Viviana, 7,218 Zhenya Pavlovna, 88-91, 100-102, 138-141 Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek München v — J |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Siegl, Veronika 1985- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1161223444 |
| author_facet | Siegl, Veronika 1985- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Siegl, Veronika 1985- |
| author_variant | v s vs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049061658 |
| classification_rvk | MS 3110 |
| contents | The Biopolitics of motherhood -- Secret conceptions -- Choreographing surrogacy -- Doing it business-style -- Technologies of alignment -- Laboring with happiness -- Ambivalences of freedom |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1370402564 (DE-599)BVBBV049061658 |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Soziologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03683nam a2200661 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049061658</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231207 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230724s2023 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781501771316</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5017-7131-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781501769917</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5017-6991-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1370402564</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049061658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MS 3110</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123666:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siegl, Veronika</subfield><subfield code="d">1985-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1161223444</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intimate strangers</subfield><subfield code="b">commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth</subfield><subfield code="c">Veronika Siegl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ithaca, New York ; London</subfield><subfield code="b">Cornell University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiv, 287 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Biopolitics of motherhood -- Secret conceptions -- Choreographing surrogacy -- Doing it business-style -- Technologies of alignment -- Laboring with happiness -- Ambivalences of freedom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book explores the practice of commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and unpacks the inner workings of this practice that is marked by secrecy, distrust, and (anonymous) business relationships. It illustrates how 'truths' accelerate market expansion into the intimate spheres of life that play out on women's bodies as mothers and workers"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ersatzmutterschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7573650-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ersatzmutterschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7573650-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">9781501769931</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="z">9781501769948</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034323797</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">305.309</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">305.309</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Russland Ukraine |
| id | DE-604.BV049061658 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:24:19Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:54:08Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781501771316 9781501769917 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034323797 |
| oclc_num | 1370402564 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-703 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-703 |
| physical | xiv, 287 Seiten 24 cm |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20230830 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Cornell University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Siegl, Veronika 1985- Verfasser (DE-588)1161223444 aut Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth Veronika Siegl Ithaca, New York ; London Cornell University Press 2023 xiv, 287 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The Biopolitics of motherhood -- Secret conceptions -- Choreographing surrogacy -- Doing it business-style -- Technologies of alignment -- Laboring with happiness -- Ambivalences of freedom "This book explores the practice of commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and unpacks the inner workings of this practice that is marked by secrecy, distrust, and (anonymous) business relationships. It illustrates how 'truths' accelerate market expansion into the intimate spheres of life that play out on women's bodies as mothers and workers"-- Ersatzmutterschaft (DE-588)7573650-0 gnd rswk-swf Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd rswk-swf Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd rswk-swf Surrogate motherhood / Russia Surrogate motherhood / Ukraine Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Russia Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects / Ukraine Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Russia Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects / Ukraine Surrogate motherhood Surrogate motherhood / Economic aspects Surrogate motherhood / Social aspects Russia Ukraine Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 g Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 g Ersatzmutterschaft (DE-588)7573650-0 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 9781501769931 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB 9781501769948 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
| spellingShingle | Siegl, Veronika 1985- Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth The Biopolitics of motherhood -- Secret conceptions -- Choreographing surrogacy -- Doing it business-style -- Technologies of alignment -- Laboring with happiness -- Ambivalences of freedom Ersatzmutterschaft (DE-588)7573650-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)7573650-0 (DE-588)4076899-5 (DE-588)4061496-7 |
| title | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |
| title_auth | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |
| title_exact_search | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |
| title_full | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth Veronika Siegl |
| title_fullStr | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth Veronika Siegl |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth Veronika Siegl |
| title_short | Intimate strangers |
| title_sort | intimate strangers commercial surrogacy in russia and ukraine and the making of truth |
| title_sub | commercial surrogacy in Russia and Ukraine and the making of truth |
| topic | Ersatzmutterschaft (DE-588)7573650-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Ersatzmutterschaft Russland Ukraine |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034323797&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sieglveronika intimatestrangerscommercialsurrogacyinrussiaandukraineandthemakingoftruth |