Holdings: Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity

Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity:

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jedlička, Petr (Author), Paitlová, Jitka 1988- (Author)
Format:	Book
Language:	English Czech
Published:	Červený Kostelec Pavel Mervart 2022
Subjects:	Philosophie Objektivität Experimentalphilosophie
Online Access:	Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract Literaturverzeichnis
Item Description:	Literaturverzeichnis Seite 251-277
Physical Description:	277 Seiten Illustration, Diagramme, Tabellen (farbig) 21 cm
ISBN:	9788074655524

Staff View

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV049028335
003	DE-604
005	20230727
007	t
008	230630s2022 ad\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d
020			\|a 9788074655524 \|9 978-80-7465-552-4
035			\|a (OCoLC)1392141859
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV049028335
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rda
041	1		\|a eng \|h cze
049			\|a DE-12
100	1		\|a Jedlička, Petr \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1297243587 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity \|c Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al.
264		1	\|a Červený Kostelec \|b Pavel Mervart \|c 2022
300			\|a 277 Seiten \|b Illustration, Diagramme, Tabellen (farbig) \|c 21 cm
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 251-277
546			\|a Text und Zusammenfassung englisch
650	0	7	\|a Philosophie \|0 (DE-588)4045791-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Objektivität \|0 (DE-588)4172310-7 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Experimentalphilosophie \|0 (DE-588)4719507-1 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
689	0	0	\|a Philosophie \|0 (DE-588)4045791-6 \|D s
689	0	1	\|a Experimentalphilosophie \|0 (DE-588)4719507-1 \|D s
689	0	2	\|a Objektivität \|0 (DE-588)4172310-7 \|D s
689	0		\|5 DE-604
700	1		\|a Paitlová, Jitka \|d 1988- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1148291350 \|4 aut
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Abstract
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Literaturverzeichnis
940	1		\|n oe
940	1		\|q BSB_NED_20230727
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034291090
942	1	1	\|c 001.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090513 \|g 4371

Record in the Search Index

_version_	1804185310794350592
adam_text	CONTENTS Foreword 9 Introduction: WHAT IS EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY (OF SCIENCE)? (Petr Jedlička) 16 L Theoretical part Chapter 1: PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, AND NEW STYLES OF REASONING (Jitka Paitlová) 40 Chapter 2: TRADITIONAL VERSUS EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE (Jitka Paitlová, Petr Jedlička) 62 Chapter 3: SEPARABILITY AS AN EXPLANATORY TOOL FOR REPLICABILITY (Petr Jedlička) 80 II. Empirical part Chapter 4: OBJECTIVITY IN THE NATURAL SCIENCES FROM THE X-PHI POINT OF VIEW: FINDINGS FROM THE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová)....................................................116 Chapter 5: AN EMPIRICAL CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVITY (Petr Jedlička, František Kalvas).............152 Chapter 6: HOW SCIENTISTS SOLVE MORAL DILEMMAS (Petr Jedlička, Frantisek Kalvas, Lucie Kubínová, Jitka Paitlová, Petr Petřík, Blanka Vlasáková, Šimon Kos) 177 Chapter 7: FUNDING AND ITS EFFECT ON SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY (Petr Jedlička) 192 IIL Experimental part Chapter 8: DOES CHAMBER REST HAVE EFFECTS ON THE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY? (Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová, Marek Malus, Filip Tylš)................ 204 In place of a conclusion: SOME PERILS ON THE ROAD AHEAD (Petrjedlička) 240 Summary......................................................................................... 248 Bibliography.................................................................................... 251 SUMMARY Our book presents different perspectives on the problem of the objectivity of the natural sciences. In addition to the traditional philosophical-scientific problem of objectivity, the chapters are also connected by experimental philosophy. The book has three parts. In the first part, we focused on the theoretical analysis of the concept of objectivity, not only in the context of traditional approaches but especially in the context of new possible research within x-phi. We outhned some unexpected trends in the most modern forms ofphilosophy and science - the traditional definition of philosophy and science says that natural sciences refer to possible experience, while philosophy concerns metaphysics, does not affect experience at all. But today, there are very different trends. Some physical theories have a highly theoretical character and cannot be proved by empirical experiments. And a new approach has been developed in philosophy too: experimental philosophy, which makes use of empirical data to inform research on philosophical questions. We argued that these approaches are not contradictions but rather new styles of reasoning. Then we concentrated on the problem of objective knowledge. We analyzed the diversity of the two key classical modern “speculative” approaches to objective knowledge (by Descartes and Kant) within the framework of theoretical considerations independent of empirical research. Then we discussed the phenomenon of the naturalization of the meaning of objectivity (by Popper, Quine, and Bloor). We asserted 248 that this specific trend of naturalization in philosophy has become largely decisive for the importance of objective knowledge. Further, we introduced the analytical term of “separability”, which is conceived as a general concept to explain the degree of replicability across empirical sciences. We showed how separability operates in science to achieve fuller control over experimental situations and we discussed separability in connection with replicability, reproducibility, and other relevant topics, such as generalizability, complexity, the hierarchy of sciences, and scientific explanations. In the second part, we brought together empirical studies to address the problem of obj ectivity that we originally undertook in our research project. Primarily, we situated our research within the context of history and the philosophy of science, and we explained the shift from theoretical to empirical and experimental perspectives on objectivity with the example of transforming a historical account into an investigative tool. In this way, we showed how our research lies at the intersection of three approaches: historical, philosophical, and experimental (empirical), and can thus be classified as integrated history and (experimental) philosophy of science - IH(E)PS. Then we presented our first empirical study - qualitative research on objectivity, which revolved about the questions such as: How is the normative ideal of objectivity defined and what are its philosophical foundations? What functional definitions of this concept do natural scientists use in their work? How is objectivity influenced by various factors operating in science? We obtained the answers from natural scientists in an methodological framework based on sociological methods, namely individual and group interviews (“focus group”). This phase was intended to help operationalize the problem of objectivity in natural science terminology, to identify related problems in contemporary science, and to specify hypotheses for further investigation. For example, we identified three main meaning-dimensions of the objectivity concept, or the distinction between “special” and “general” objectivity. This made it possible to analytically grasp the very different understanding of the concept of objectivity that has emerged in interviews with scientists. 249 Our next empirical study was quantitative, and it delineated the results of the survey that was conducted using a specific x-phi tool: solving moral dilemmas. X-phi typically investigates moral judgements in various groups and settings, for example vignettes are routinely employed to gain insights into decision making in scientific disciplines, such as medicine. We presented data analysis and interpretation of the questionnaire, which was focused on moral judgements in contemporary science relating to topics such as scientific integrity (resistance to questionable publishing practices), biases in science (sensitivity to gender or ethnic stereotypes) and ethical questions (scientific progress). The following chapter dealt with a specific and important factor in the sciences - funding, which can substantially accelerate or impede the development of scientific disciplines. There are numerous examples of this in the past and contemporary science. Our research revealed that the scientists almost unequivocally agree that funding can to some degree affect the objectivity of research, although to a various degree in individual disciplines. The last part of our book introduced an original experiment ֊ an exploratory study on the understanding of reafity among scientists. For the purposes of our study, we employed Chamber REST (Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique), which has been known to produce substantial perceptual effects, such as visual or auditory pseudo hallucinations. We hypothesized that such experiences could alter basic underlying metaphysical beliefs which our subjects-scientists hold about reality. The REST technique showed the potential to induce changes in the scientists, but the outcome depends on the default views ofthe participants. In conclusion, we hope that our work helped to disentangle the meanings of objectivity in the contemporary scientific community and also prove that x-phi methods can be successfully integrated within the traditional philosophical approaches. Moreover, we have introduced a new experimental REST technique into the x-phi methodological toolbox. The data obtained in our research allow further analysis and interpretation, provide a basis for new experiments, and open up new possibilities and ways of solving problems in the philosophy of science. 250 BIBLIOGRAPHY Assessing Science (China). (2015). Nature Outlook, 520,7549, on line: https://www.nature.com/collections/gpwgzsqnj. Adorno, T. W. et al. ( 1972). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Luchterland. Agazzi, E. (2017). The Truth of Theories and Scientific Reahsm, In E. Agazzi (ed.), Varieties of Scientific Realism. Objectivity and Truth in Science. Cham: Springer, 55. Ahlenius, H. Tännsjö, T. (2012). Chinese and Westerners Respond Differently to the Trolley Dilemmas. Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (3-4), 195-201. Albert, H. Topitsch, E., eds. (1971). Werturteilsstreit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Alexander,}. (2012). Experimental philosophy: an introduction. Malden: Polity. Anderson, C. J. et al. (2016). Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science. 351(6277), 1037. Anstey, P. 8c Vanzo A. (2016). Early Modern Experimental Philosophy. In: J. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 87-102. Arabatzis, T. Schickore, J. (2012). Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science, 20 (4), 395-408. Awad, E. 8c Dsouza, S. Kim, R. Schulz, J. Henrich, J. Shariff, A. Bonnefon, J. Rahwan, I. (2018). The Moral Machine Experiment. Nature, 563 (7729), 59-64. 251 Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the hd on reproducibility. Nature 533,452-454. Baker, Μ. (2016). Reproducibility: Respect your cells! Nature 537, 433-435. Baker, Μ. (2016). The Reproducibility Survey Questionnaire. In Baker, Μ. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533,452-454. Retrieved from www.nature.com/news/polopoly_ fs/ 7.36741 !/file/Reproduciblility%20Questionnaire.doc. Barrett, F. S. Griffiths, R. R. (2018). Classic Hallucinogens and Mystical Experiences: Phenomenology and Neural Correlates. Curr Top Behav Neurosci, 36, 393-430. Barrett, F. S. Johnson, Μ. W. Griffiths, R. R. (2015). Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin, ƒ Psychopharmacol, 29, 1182-1190. Begley, C. G. Ellis, L. Μ. (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research: Drug development. Nature, 483 (7391), 531-533. Benda, L. (2011). Historiografická metoda Thomase Kuhna. Teorie vědy/Theory of Science, 33/3.445-468. Bergman, R. G. Danheiser, R. L. (2016). Reproducibility in chemical research. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 55 (41), 12548-12549. Bertuglia, C. S. Vaio, F. (2006). Nonlinearity, chaos, and complexity: the dynamics of natural and social systems. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Bigaj, T. Wuthrich, Ch., eds. (2015). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi. Bishop, D. Gill, E. (2020). Robert Boyle on the importance of reporting and replicating experiments. Journal of the Royal Society ofMedicine, 113 (2), 79-83. Bisson J. McAlpine, J. B. Friesen, J. B. Chen, S. N. Graham, J. Pauli, G. F. (2016). Can Invalid Bioactives Undermine Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery? J Med Chern, 59 (5), 1671-90. Bisson, J. Simmler, C. Chen, S.-N. Friesen, J. B. Lankin, D. C. McAlpine, J. B. Pauli, G. F. (2016). Dissemination of original 252 NMR data enhances reproducibility and integrity in chemical research. Natural Product Reports, 33 (9), 1028-1033. BITSS: Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences (2012). BITSS About. Retrieved from https://www.bitss.org. Blasius, B. Rudolf, L. Weithoff, G. et al. (2020). Long-term cychc persistence in an experimental predator-prey system. Nature, S77,226-230. Bliss, E. L. Clark, L. D. (1962). Visual hallucinations. In L. J. West (ed.). Hallucinations. New York: Grune Stratton, 92-108. Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Blumberg, A. E. Feigl, H. (1931). Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy, XXVIII, 11,281-296. Bohlen, Μ. Hayes, E. R. Bohlen, B. Bailoo, J. D. Crabbe, J. C. Wahlsten, D. (2014). Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol. Behav Brain Res, 272,46-54. Bonnefon, J. Shariff, A. Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352 (6293), 1573-1576. Bryan, Ch. J. Yeager, D. S. O’Brien, J. Μ. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (51), 25535-25545. Buckwaiter, W. (2016). Introduction. In: J. Sytsma, W. Buckwaiter. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 1-2. Bunge, Μ., ed. (1967). Qiiantum Theory and Reality: Studies in the Foundations Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. BerlinHeidelberg-New York: Springer. Button, K. et al. (2ОІЗ). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14,365-376. Cai, L., Friedman, N. Xie, X. S. (2006). Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature, 440,358-362. 253 Camerer, C. F. et al. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351 (6280), 1433-6. Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carnap, R. (2004). Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache. In R. Carnap. Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie und andere metaphysikkritische Schriften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Carnap, R. ( 1932/1959). Elimination of metaphysics through the logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (ed.). Logical positivism. New York: The Free Press, 60-81. Cartwright, N. (1991). Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins. History of Political Economy, 23 (1), 143-155. Castelvecchi, D. (2018). CERN suspends physicist over remarks on gender bias. Nature, NEWS October 1, 2018, on-line: https:// www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06913-0. Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Is String Theory Science? Nature Physics, December 23,2015 (on-line: https://www.scientificamerican . com/article/is-string-theory-science/). Chalmers, D. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapman, S. (2017). The experimental and the empirical: Arne Naess’ statistical approach to philosophy. British Journalfor the History ofPhilosophy, 26 (5), 961-981. Choi, P.J. c Cai, L. Frieda, K. Xie, X.S. (2008). A stochastic single-molecule event triggers phenotype switching of a bacterial cell. Science, 322 (59OO), 442-6. Choules, Μ. P. Klein, Լ. L. Lankin, D. C. McAlpine, J. B. Cho, S. H. Cheng, J. Lee, H. Suh, J. W. 8? Jaki, B. U. Franzblau, S. G. Pauli, G. F. (2018). Residual Complexity Does Impact Organic Chemistry and Drug Discovery: The Case of Rufomyazine and Rufomycin. J Org Chern, 83 (12), 6664-6672. 254 Churchland, P. M. (2013). Platos Camera: How the Physical Brain Captures a Landscape ofAbstract Universals. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Cohen, J. (2019). The untold story of the circle of trust’ behind the world’s first gene-edited babies. Science, August 1, 2019, on-line: https : 11www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/untold-storycircle-trust-behind-world-s-first-gene-edited-babies. Cohen-Boulakia, S. Sc Belhajjame, K. Collin, O., et al. (2017). Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 75,284-298. Colher, A. (2ՕՕՅ). In Defence of Objectivity and Other Essays. London and New York: Routledge. Collin, F. (2OI1). Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer. Comte, A. (1856). Social Physics: From the Positive Philosophy. New York: Calvin Blanchard. Creswell, J. W. (2ՕՕՅ). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History ofArgument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts. London: Duckworth. Crone, E. E. Molofsky, J. (1998). Message in a bottle? Utility and limitations of recent ecological bottle experiments. Integr. Biol., 1, 209-214. Currie, A. (2020). Bottled Understanding: The Role of Lab Work in Ecology. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Currie, A. (2020). Bottled Understanding: The Role ofLab Work in Ecology. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 71 (Յ), 905-932. Cyranoski, D. (2019). The CRISPR-baby scandal: what’s next for human gene-editing. Nature, NEWS FEATURE, February 26, 2019, on-line: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-01900673-1. 255 Cyranoski, D. (2017). The secret war against counterfeit science. Nature, 545,148-150. Dahms, H.-J. (1994). Positivismusstreit. Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Daston, L. Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books. Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dawid, R. (2013). String Theory and the Scientific Method. New York: Cambridge University Press. de Abreu, M. S. Kalueff, A. V. (2021). Of mice and zebrafish: the impact of the experimenter identity on animal behavior. Lab Anim, 50 (7). Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from the Objections and Replies. (Translated and edited by John Cottingham.) Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Lexington (MA): D. C. Heath. Diamond, J. (1983). Ecology: Laboratory, field and natural experiments. Nature, 304, 586-587. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: R. J. Sternberg J. E. Davidson (eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press, 365-395. Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 17 (3), 397-434. Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Edmonds, D. (2015). Would you kill the fat man? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Elowitz, Μ. B. Levine, A. J. Siggia, E. D. Swain, P. S. (2002). Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science, 297, 1183-1186. Evans, S. et al. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in 256 ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15,2,160-170. Everitt, C. W. F. et al. (2011 ). Gravity Probe В : Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett, 106, 221101. Ewald, J. (2003). A Critique for Phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14,291-296. Falk, A. Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Science, 326 (5952), 535-538. Fanelli, D. Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS One, 8 (6), e66938. Fanelli, D. (2018). Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018,115 (11), 2628-2631. Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS One, on-line: https://journals.plos.org/ plosone/article ?id= 10.1371 /journal.pone.0010068. Feltz, A. (2009). Experimental Philosophy. Analyse A Kritik, 31 (2), 201-219. Fischer, E. (2014). Paradox-Psychologie: Kognitive Epistemologie und philosophische Problemlösung. In T. Grundmann, J. Horvath J. Kipper, J. (eds.). Die Experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 322-349. Fisher, Μ. Knobe, J. Strickland, B. Keil, F. (2016). The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity. Cognitive Science, 41 (4), 1119-1134. Fleck, L. (1935/1979). The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Francia, G. Kerbel, R. S. (2010). Raising the bar for cancer therapy models. Nat Biotechnol., 28 (6), 561-2. Francis, K. Howard, C. Howard, I. Gummerum, Μ. 8c Ganis, G. Anderson, G. Terbeek, S. (2016). Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? PLOS ONE, 11 (10), e0170133. 257 Francis, К. В. Terbeek, S. Briazu, R. A. et al. (2017). Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 7 (13954). Franklin, A. (2018). Is It the ‘Same’ Result: Replication in Physics. San Rafael: Morgan Claypool Publishers. Fulong, L. (2009). Discovery of Artemisinin (Qinghaosu). Molecules, 14, 5362-5366. Gali son, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture ofMicrophysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gane, Μ. (2006). Auguste Comte. London: Routledge. Giere, R. (2011). History and Philosophy of Science: Thirty-Five Years Later. In S. Mauskopf 8c T. Schmaltz (eds.). Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer, 59-66. Giere, R. (1990). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach (Science and its conceptualfoundations series). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gigerenzer, G. 8c Brighton, H. (2009). Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1 (1), 107-143. Gilbert, D. T. King, G. Pettigrew, S. Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on “estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science, 351 (6277), 1037-1037. Glock, H. (2009). What is analytic philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goldberger, L. Holt, R. R. ( 1961 ). Experimental interference with reality contact: Individual differences. In P. Solomon et al. (eds.). Sensory deprivation. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 130-142. Greene, J. 8c Nystrom, L. 8c Engeli, A. Darley, J. Cohen, J. (2004). The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment, Neuron, 44 (2), 389-400. Griffiths, A. J. F. 8c Miller, J. H. 8c Suzuki, D. T. et al. (2000). Au Introduction to Genetic Analysis. New York: W. H. Freeman. 258 Discovery of the lac system: negative control. Retrieved from https : /1www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21954/. Griffiths, P. Machery, E. Linquist, S. (2009). The Vernacular Concept of Innateness. Mind Language, 24 (5), 605-630. Griffiths, P. Stotz, К. (2008). Experimental Philosophy of Science. Philosophy Compass, 3 (3), 507-521. Griffiths, R. R. Johnson, Μ. W. Richards, W. A. Richards, B. D. Jesse, R. MacLean, К. A. Barrett, F. S. Cosimano, Μ. P. Klinedinst, Μ. A. (2017). Psilocybin-occasioned mystical-type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors, ƒ Psychopharmacol, 32 (1), 49-69. Griffiths, R. R. Johnson, Μ. W. Carducci, Μ. A. Umbricht, A. Richards, W. A. Richards, B. D. Cosimano, Μ. P. Klinedinst, Μ. A. (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal ofpsychopharmacology, 30, 1181-1197. Grof, S. Goodman, L. E. Richards, W. A. Kurland, A. A. (1973). LSD-assisted psychotherapy in patients with terminal cancer. International pharmacopsychiatry, 8,129-44. Grundmann, T. Horvath, J., Kipper, J., eds. (2014). Die experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Hacking, I. (2012). ‘Language, truth and reason 30 years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43 (4), 599-609. Hacking, I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hacking, I. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking or reasoning: A new analytical tool for historians and philosophers of the sciences. In K. Gavroglu J. Christianidis E. Nicolaidis (eds.). Trends in the historiography of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 31-48. 259 Hacking, L (1992). ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23,1-20. Han, X. Appelbaum, R.P. (2018). China s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot. PLOS One, 13 (4), e0195347. Hannikainen, L R. 8c Machery, E. 8c Rose, D., Stich, S. Olivóla, C. Y. Sousa, R et al. (2019). For whom does determinism undermine moral responsibility? Surveying the conditions for free will across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2428. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Hastings, A. (2020). Long-term predator-prey cycles finally achieved in the lab. Nature, S77,172-173. Hartocollis, A. (2018). The Harvard Bias Suit by Asian-Americans: 5 Key Issues. The New York Times, December 20, 2018, on-line: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/ 12/20/us/harvard-asianamerican-students-discrimination.html. Harwood, J. (1993). Styles of scientific thought: the German genetics community, 1900-1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hawking, S. W. (2005). The Theory of Everything. The Origin and Fate of the Universe. Los Angeles: Phoenix Books. Hebert, P. D. N. 8c Gregory, R. T. (2005). The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54 (5), 852-859. Heisenberg, W. (2007). Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper Perennial. Hempel, C. G. Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15 (2), 135-175. Henrich, J. Heine, S. Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 (2-3), 61-83. Heron, W. . Doane, B. K. Scott, T. H. (1956). Visual disturbances after prolonged perceptual isolation. Can J Psychol, 10 (1), 13-18. Higgins, J. P. (2002). Nonlinear systems in medicine. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 7S (5-6), 247-260. 260 Hindriks, F. (2019). Explanatory Unification in Experimental Philosophy: Let’s Keep It Real. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 10 (1), 219-242. Hocquet, A. Wieher, F. (2021). Epistemic issues in computational reproducibility: software as the elephant in the room. Euro Jnl Phil Sei, 11, 38. Hood, R. W., Jr. (1975). The construction and preliminary vahdation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journalfor the Scientific Study ofReligion, 14,29-41. Hood, R. W. Hill, P. C. Spilka, В. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. С. V. (2016). Examining the specificity of the seductive allure effect. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman J. C. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1829-1834. Philadelphia, PA: Cognitive Science Society. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S. Taylor, J. С. V. (2016). The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition, 155, 67-76. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S. Taylor, J. С. V. (2019). Does expertise moderate the seductive allure of reductive explanations? Acta Psychologien, 198. Horgan, J. (2OI5). The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. New York: Basic Books. Horvath, P. Aulner, N. Bielde, Μ. et al. (2016). Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 15, 751-769. Hřebíčková, Μ. Urbánek, T. (2001) NEO pětifaktorový osobnostní inventář (podle NEO Five-Factor Inventory PT Costy a RR McCraee). Praha: Testcentrum. Huang, F. (2018). Quakty deficit behes the hype. Nature, 564 (7735), 70-71. 261 Hunt, К. (1975). Do We Really Need More Rephcations? Psychological Reports, 36, 587-593. Hurlbut, B. (2018). In CRISPRs World: Genome Editing and the Politics of Global Science. In Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society, S. Gibbon, B. Prainsack, S. Hilgartner, J. Lamoreaux (eds.). New York: Routledge. Husserl, E. ( 1963). Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. (Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson.) New York: СоШег Books. Irrlitz, G. (2010). Kant - Handbuch. Stuttgart J. B. Metzler, loannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 645-654. loannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most pubhshed research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2 (8), el24. Iso-Ahola, S. E. (2017). Reproducibility in psychological science: When do psychological phenomena exist? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 879. Jackson, C. W, Jr. Pollard, J. C. ( 1962). Sensory deprivation and suggestion: A theoretical approach. Behav. Set., 7, 332-342. Jasanoff, S. Hurlbut, B. Saha, K. (2015). CRISPRDemocracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology, XXXII, 1, on-line: https://issues.org/ crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusivedehberation/. Jedlička, P. (2020). Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines. Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science, 42 (2), 175-199. Jedlička, P. Kalvas, F. (2021). Theoretical and empirical perspectives on objectivity: Transforming a historical account into an investigative tool, in Integrated History and Philosophy of Science Conference Proceedings. Volume 1(1) [online at UScholarWorks Journals] : https://scholarworks.iu.edu/ journals/index.php/ihps/issue/view/ 2125. Jedlička, P. Paitlová, J. (2019). Objektivita přírodních věd pohledem experimentální filosofie. Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science, 41 (2), 229-258. 262 John, L. К. Loewenstein, G. Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 5, 524-532. Johnson, V. E. Payne, R. D. Wang, T. Asher, A. Mandal, S. (2017). On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112 (517), 1-10. Jura, J. Węgrzyn, P. Jura, J. Koj, A. (2006). Regulatory mechanisms of gene expression: complexity with elements of deterministic chaos. Acta Biochim Pol., 53 (1), 1-10. Kahneman, D. Slovic, R, Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kaiser, Μ. Jug, F. Julou, T. et al. (2018). Monitoring single-cell gene regulation under dynamically controllable conditions with integrated microfluidics and software. Nat Commun, 9, 212. Kant, I. ( 1998). Critique ofpure reason. (Translated and edited by P. Guyer A. W. Wood.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kaupinnen, A. (2007). The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10 (2), 95 - 118. Kavková, V. Malus, M. (2021). Possible Applications of Flotation-REST and its Effects on Human Psychophysiology Regarding Stress, Anxiety and Depression. Psychology and its Contexts, 12 (1), 5-21. Kelemen, D. Rottman, J. Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142 (4), 1074-1083. Kjellgren, A. Lyden, F. Norlander, T. (2008). Sensory Isolation in Flotation Tanks: Altered States of Consciousness and Effects on Well-being. The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), 636-656. Kjellgren, A. 8c Sundequist, U. Sundholm, U. Norlander, T. Archer, T. (2003). Altered consciousness in flotation-REST and chamber-REST: Experience of experimental pain and subjective stress. Social Behavior and Personality, 32,103-115. 263 Klahr, D. Dunbar, К. (2000). Coordinating Dual Search: The Role of Evidence. In: D. Klahr, Exploring Science. The Cognition and Development ofDiscovery Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 61-82. Kipling, W. W. 8c Mishler, B. D. Wheeler, Q. D. (2005). The Perils of DNA Barcoding and the Need for Integrative Taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54 (5), 844-851. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science. Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press. Knobe, J. (2021). Philosophical Intuitions Are Surprisingly Stable Across both Demographic Groups and Situations. Filozofia Nauki, 29 (2), 11-76. Knobe, J. (2016). Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science. In Justin Sytsma Wesley Buckwaiter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Blackwell. Knobe, J. (2015). Philosophers are doing something different now: Quantitative data. Cognition, 135,36-38. Knobe, J. (2004). What is experimental Philosophy? The Philosophers Magazine, 28,37-39. Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (2008): An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto. In J. Knobe 8c S. Nichols (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Knobe, J. Samuels, R. (2013). Thinking like a scientist: Innateness as a case study. Cognition, 126 (1), 72-86. Kohler, R. E. (2002). Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the LabField Border in Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1962/1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (IL) : University of Chicago Press. Kupka, M. Malus, M. Charvát, M. (2019). Terapie tmou: Katamnestická studie. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Kupka, Μ. 8c Malus, M. Kavková, V. Řehan, V. (2012). Technika omezené zevní stimulace. Československá Psychologie, 56 (5), 488-499. Lacey, H. (1999). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Routledge. 264 Lakatos, L ( 1971 ). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions, In R. Buck R. S. Cohen (eds.). PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970. Dordrecht: D. Reidi, 91-108. Lal, S. Li, A., dos Remedios, C. (2016). Limitations in Translating Animal Studies to Humans in Cardiovascular Disease. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res, 9, 165-166. Latour, B. Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Lau, Ch.-F. (2016). A Deflationary Approach to Hegels Metaphysics. In A. de Laurentiis (ed.). Hegel and Metaphysics. On Logic and Ontology in the System. Berhn/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 27-42. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press. Laughlin, R. B. Sc Pines, D. (2000). The Theory of Everything. Proceedings of the National Academiy of Science of the United States ofAmerica, 97 (1), 28-31. LeBel, E. P. Berger, D. Campbell, L., Sc Loving, T. J. (2017). Falsifiability is not optional. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (2), 254-261. Leff, J. (1968). Perceptual Phenomena and Personality in Sensory Deprivation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114 (517), 1499-1508. Levitt, S. D., Sc List, J. A. (2007). Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian Journal ofEconomics/Revue canadienne d économique, 40, 347-370. Lexchin, J. (2012). Sponsorship bias in clinical research. NCBI, 24 (4), 233-242. Libby, P. (2015). Murine ‘Model’ Monotheism. Circulation Research, 117(11), 921-925. Liechti, Μ. Dolder, P. C. Schmid, Y. (2017). Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 234 (9/10), 1499-1510. 265 Lilly, J. C. ( 1956). Mental effects of reduction of ordinary levels of physical stimuli on intact, healthy persons. Psychiatric Research Reports, 5,1-9. Lilly, J. C. (1978). The Scientist: A Novel Autobiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott. Lilly, J. C. 8c Enright, C. S. (1977). The Deep Self: Profound Relaxation. and the Tank Isolation Technique. New York: Simon and Schuster. Linquist, S. . Machery, E. 8c Griffiths, P. Stotz, К. (2011). Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366 (1563), 444-453. List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 115 (З), 482-492. Locke, J. (1788). An essay concerning human understanding. London: J. F. and C. Rivington. Ludwig, A. Μ. (1966). Altered States of Consciousness. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 15 (З), 225-234. Machery, E. (2016). Experimental Philosophy of Science. In A Companion to Experimental Philosophy,]. Sytsma, W. Buckwaiter (eds.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 475-490. Machery, E. Griffiths, P. Linquist, S. Stotz, К. (2019). Scientists’ concepts of innateness: evolution or attraction? In D. A. Wilkenfeld R. Samuels (eds.). Advances in experimental philosophy of science. Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London; New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 172-201. Machery, E., O’Neill, E. (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. New York: Routledge. MacLean, К. A. Leoutsakos, J. Μ. S. Johnson, Μ. W. Griffiths, R. R. (2012). Factor Analysis of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire: A Study of Experiences Occasioned by the Hallucinogen Psilocybin. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51 (4), 721-737. Maco, R. (2021). Naturalism and the task of philosophy. Filosofický časopis, 69 (Special issue З), 44-61. 266 Maienschein, J. (1991). Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880-1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Majić, T. Schmidt, T. T. Gallinat, J. (2015). Peak experiences and the afterglow phenomenon: when and how do therapeutic effects of hallucinogens depend on psychedelic experiences? JPsychopharmacol, 29 (З), 241-53. Malte, C. E. Holdrege, C. (2005). More Taxonomy, Not DNA Barcoding. BioScience, 55 (10), 822-824. Marvin, Μ. (1969). Hallucinations, Reported Sensations, and Images. In J. P. Zubek, (ed.). Sensory Deprivation: IS Years of Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 85-125. Maslow, A. H. (1964). Religions, values, and peak experiences. London: Penguin Books Limited. Mason, O. Brady, F. (2009). The psychotomimetic effects of short-term sensory deprivation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197 (10), 783-785. Matsubara, K. (2013). Realism, underdetermination and string theory dualities. Synthese, 190 (З), 471-489. Maudhn, T. (2007). The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meng, X. Y. Zhang, H. X. Mezei, Μ. Cui, Μ. (2011). Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 7 (2), 146-157. Merton, R. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merton, R. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press. Mohr, P. (2017). Appendix. In NSF: Robustness, Reliability and Reproducibility in Scientific Research Report (Workshop National Science Foundation), 25-25. Retrieved from http://www.mrsec. harvard.edu/2017NSFReliability/include/NSF_Workshop_ Robustness.Rehability.Reproducibility.Report.pdf. Montévil, Μ. (2019). Measurement in biology is methodized by theory. Biol Philos, 34,35. 267 Mullane, К. Curtis, M. J. Wilhams Μ., eds. (2017). Research in the Biomedical Sciences Transparent and Reproducible. London: Academic Press. Muntean, I. (2015). A Metaphysics from String Dualities: Pluralism, Fundamentalism, Modality. In T. Bigaj Ch. Wuthrich (eds.). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi, 259-292. Murphy, D. B. Myers, T. I. Smith, S. ( 1963). Reported visual sensations as a function of sustained sensory deprivation and social isolation. USA Leadership HRU Draft res. Rep., Presidio of Monterey (Pioneer VI). Murphy, T. (2OI5). Experimental Philosophy, 1935-1965. In: J. Knobe, T. Lombrozo S. Nichols, Oxford studies in experimental philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 325-368. Myers, T. I. Murphy, D. B. (1962). Reported visual sensation during brief exposure to reduced sensory input. In L. J. West (ed.). Hallucinations. New York: Grune Stratton, 118-124. Mynatt, C. Doherty, Μ. Tweney, R. (1977). Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(l),85-95. NASEM: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2OI9). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nadelhoffer, T. Nahmias, E. (2007). The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10 (2), 123-149. Naess, A. (1938). Truth as Conceived by Those who are Not Professional Philosophers. Oslo: Komm. Dybwad. Nagel, T. (1989). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press. Nemeth, E. (2OIO). An Improbable Case Of Philosophy: Arne Naess Between - Empiricism, Existentialism And Metaphysics. In: J. Manninen F. Stadler (eds.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14: 268 The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries- Networks and Transformations of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer, 281-292. Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press. Neuliep, J. W. Crandall, R. (1993). Reviewer bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21-29. Nisbett, R. E. 8c Peng, K. Choi, I. Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108,291-310. Norlander, T. 8c Kjellgren, A. Archer, T. (2000). The Experience of Flotation-Rest as a Function of Setting and Previous Experience of Altered State of Consciousness. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20 (2), 161-178. Norlander, T. Kjellgren, A. Archer, T. (2003). Effects of Flotation-Versus Chamber-Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique (Rest) on Creativity and Realism under Stress and Non-Stress Conditions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22 (4), 343-359. Normile, D. (2017). China cracks down after investigation finds massive peer-review fraud. Science, on-line: https://www.science. org/ content/article/china-cracks-down-after-investigation-findsmassive-peer-review-fraud Nosek В. A., Errington T. Μ. (2020). The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it. Nature, 583, 518-520. Nosek В. A., Errington, T. Μ. (2017). Making sense of replications. eLife, 6, e23383. Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. NSF: National Science Foundation (2017). Robustness, Reliability and Reproducibility in Scientific Research Report (Workshop National Science Foundation). Retrieved from http://www.mrsec. 269 harvard.edu/2017NSFReliability/include/NS F_Workshop_ Robustness.Reliabihty.Reproducibihty.Report.pdf. NSF: National Science Foundation (2015). Social, Behavioral, and Economie Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science. Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. Retrieved from https://www. nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_ Research_Report.pdf Odenbaugh, J. (2006). Message in the Bottle: The Constraints of Experimentation on Model Building. Philosophy of Science, 73 (5). OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2013). Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, https://osf.io/e81x1/. OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2015). Reproducibility Project: Psychology, https://osf.io/ezcuj/. Pahnke, W. N. Kurland, A. A. Goodman, L. E. Richards, W. A. (1969). LSD-assisted psychotherapy with terminal cancer patients. Current psychiatric therapies, 9,144-52. Penders, B. Horstman, K. Vos, R. (2008). Walking the Line between Lab and Computation: The ,Moisť Zone. BioScience, 58, 8. Penrose, R. (1996). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pernet, C., Pohne, J. B. (2015). Improving functional magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility. GigaScience, 4 (15). Plato (1969). Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. 5 6. (Translated by P. Shorey.) Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Popper, K. (2009). The Two Fundamental Problems of the Theory of Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge. Popper, K. R. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge. Popper, K. (1994). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 270 Popper, К. (1989). Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. In T. W. Adorno et al. Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Luchterhand, 103-123. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper. Price, D. J. S. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149 (3683), 510-515. Prinz, J. J. (2008). Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy. In J. Knobe S. Nichols (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Prinz, F. Schlange, T. Asadullah, K. (2011). Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov, 10, 712. Putnam, H. (1991). Representation and Reality. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Quine, W. V. O. (1992). Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Qpine, W. V. O. (1981). Theoriesand Things. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Quine, W. V. O. ( 1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. Rad, Μ. S. Martingano, A. J. Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115 (45), 11401-11405. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rescher, N. (1997). Objectivity: The Obligations of Impersonal Reason. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press. Robinson, B. Gonnerman, C. O’Rourke, Μ. (2019). Experimental Philosophy of Science and Philosophical Differences across the Sciences. Philosophy of Science, 86 (3), 551-576. 271 Rogers, К. (2005). On the Metaphysics ofExperimental Physics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Romero, F. (2OI9). Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 14, ЄІ2633. Rorty, R. (1998). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rose, D. Danks, D. (2013). In Defense of a Broad Conception of Experimental Philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 44 (4), 512-532. Rosenthal, N. Brown, S. (2007). The mouse ascending: Perspectives for human-disease models. Nature Cell Biology, 9, 993-999. Ross, S. Bossis, A. Guss, J. Agin-Liebes, G. Malone, T. Cohen, B. Mennenga, S. E. Belser, A. Kalliontzi, K. Babb, J. Su, Z. Corby, P. Schmidt, B. L. (2016). Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Journal ofpsychopharmacology, 30, 1165-1180. Rossi, A. Μ. Sturrock, J. B. Solomon, P. (1963). Suggestion effects on reported imagery in sensory deprivation. Percept, mot. Skills, 16,39-45. Sabroe, I. Dockrell, D. H. Vogel, S. N. Renshaw, S. A. Whyte, Μ. K. Dower, S. K. (2007). Identifying and hurdling obstacles to translational research. Nat Rev Immunol, 7(1), 77-82. Sanbonmatsu, D. Μ. Cooley, E. H. Butner, J. E. (2021). The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science. Front Psychol, 11,580111. Sarkissian, H. 8c Chatterjee, A. de Brigard, F. Knobe, J. 8c Nichols, S. 8c Sirker, S. (2010). Is Belief in Free Will a Cultural Universal? Mind and Language, 25 (З), 346-358. Sawinski, D. Maltzman, J. S. (2015). Do mice need an order of fries to be relevant for transplant studies? American Journal of Transplantation, 15,2282-4. 272 Schenberg, E. E. (2018). Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy: A Paradigm Shift in Psychiatric Research and Development. Front. Pharmacol, 9,733. Schindler, S. K. (forthcoming): Theoretical Virtues: do scientists think what philosophers think they ought to think? Philosophy of Science. Schultz, D. P. (1965). Sensory Restriction. Effects on Behaviour. New York and London: Academic Press. Segall, M. H. Campbell, D. T. Herskovits, M. J. (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Seyhan, A. (2019). Lost in translation: the valley of death across preclinical and clinical divide - identification of problems and overcoming obstacles. Translational Medicine Communications, 4 (18). Shapin, S. Schaffer, S. (1989). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shekhar, C. (2008). In silico pharmacology: computer-aided methods could transform drug development. Chern Biol., 15 (5), 413-4. Shore, E. (1971). Sensory deprivation, preconscious processes and scientific thinking. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41,574-580. Siebert, S. Machesky, L. Μ. Insali, R. H. (2015). Overflow in science and its implications for trust. eLife, 14,4, ЄІ0825. Simon, H. Cohen, R. Wartofsky, Μ. (1977). Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Śmigielski, L. 8л Kometer, Μ. Scheidegger, M. Krähenmann, R. Huber, T. Vollenweider, F. X. (2019). Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-13. Smolin, L. (2006). The Trouble with Physics. The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Solomon, Μ. (2001). Social Empiricism. Cambridge: MIT Press. 273 Sorge, R. Martin, L. Isbester, К. et al. (2014). Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents. Nat Methods, 11, 629-632. Sosa, E. (2007). Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Studies: An International Journalfor Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 132 (1), 99-107. Sprat, T. ( 1667). The history of the Royal-Society ofLondon for the improving of natural knowledge. London. Staley, J. T. (2006). The bacterial species dilemma and the genomicphylogenetic species concept. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 361,1899-1909. Sterelny, K. Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy ofBiology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sterne, J. A., Davey, S. G. (2001). Sifting the evidence - what’s wrong with significance tests? TheBMJ, 322 (7280), 226-31. Stotz, К. Griffiths, P. (2004). Genes, “Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test“. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 26 ( 1 ), 5-28. Stotz, К. Griffiths, P. Knight, R. (2004). How biologists conceptualize genes: an empirical study. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35 (4), 647-673. Studerus, E. Gamma, A. Kometer, Μ. Vollenweider, F. X. (2OI2). Prediction of psilocybin response in healthy volunteers. PLOS One, 7 (2), e30800. Suedfeld, P. ( 1980). Restricted environmental stimulation: Research and clinical applications. New York: John Wiley Sons. Suedfeld, P. Borrie, R. A. (1999). Health and therapeutic applications of chamber and flotation restricted environmental stimulation therapy (REST). Psychology Health, 14 (З), 545-566. Suedfeld, P. Coren, S. (1989). Perceptual isolation, sensory deprivation, and rest: Moving introductory psychology texts out of the 1950s. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 30 (1), 17-29. 274 Suedfeld, P. Eich, E. (1995). Autobiographical memory and affect under conditions of reduced environmental stimulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15,321-326. Suedfeld, P. Metcalfe, J. Bluck, S. (1987). Enhancement of scientific creativity by flotation REST (restricted environmental stimulation technique). Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 7 (З), 219-231. Suedfeld, P. Rank, A. D. Malus, Μ. (2018). Spontaneous mental experiences in extreme and unusual environments. In K. Christoff K. C. R. Fox (eds.). The Oxford handbook of spontaneus thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming (Vol. 1 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stace, W. T. (1961). Mysticism and philosophy. London: Macmillan. Sweedler, J. V. (2015). Striving for Reproducible Science, Analytical Chemistry, 87 (23), 11603-11604. Sytsma, J. Buckwaiter, W., eds. (2016). A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. Sytsma, J. c Livengood, J. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. Ontario: Broadview Press Ltd. Täuber, S. von Lieres, E. Grünberger, A. (2020). Dynamic Environmental Control in Microfluidic Single-Cell Cultivations: From Concepts to Applications. Small, 16,1906670. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Thurner, S. . Hanel, R. A. Klimek, P. (2019). Introduction to the theory of complex systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. van der Valk, J. Bieback K., Buta, C. Cochrane, B. Dirks, W. G. Fu, J. Hickman, J. J. Hohensee, C. et al. (2018). Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS): Past - Present - Future. ALTEX, 35 (1), 99-118. Viktorinová, Μ. Tylš, F. (2016). Nevědomé procesy lidské myslipoznatky z psychedelického výzkumu. Psychiatrie, 20 (2), 100-107. 275 Vinkers, CH. H. Tijdink, J. К. Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. BMJ, 351, 6467. Voelkl, B. Altman N. S. Forsman, A. et al. (2020). Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nat Rev Neurosci, 21, 384-393. Vohlídalová, M. 8c Linková, Μ., eds. (2017). Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. Vollenweider, F. X. Geyer, Μ. A. (2001). A systems model of altered consciousness: Integrating natural and drug-induced psychoses. Brain Research Bulletin, 56 (5), 495-507. Wakabayashi, D. (2020). Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam [online] New York Times. Source: www.nytimes.eom/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverlessfatality.html. Wason, P. ( I960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 12 (3), 129-140. Weber, Μ. (1988). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wisssenschaftslehre. (Herausgegeben von Johannes Winckelmann.) Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Weinberg,}. Μ. (2016). Going Positive by Going Negative: On Keeping X-Phi Relevant Dangerous. In: J. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter, A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 71-86. Weinberg,}. Nichols, S. Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29 (1/2), 429-460. Wilkenfeld, D. Samuels, R. A., eds. (2019). Advances in experimental philosophy of science. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Williams, Ch. (2019). On ‘modified human agents’: }ohn Lilly and the paranoid style in American neuroscience. History of the Human Sciences, 32, 84-107. Williamson, T. (2016). Philosophical Criticisms of Experimental Philosophy. In}. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, 22-36. New York: Blackwell. 276 Woit, P. (2006). Not Even Wrong. The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challange to Unify the Laws ofPhysics. London: Jonathan Cape. Wright, J. H. (1906). The Origin of Plato’s Cave. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 17,131-142. Wyller, E. A. (1970). The late Plato: Tübingen Lectures. Hamburg: Meiner. XRP: X-Phi Rephcability Project (2018). Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy. Review ofPhilosophy and Psychology (1), 1-36. Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology. Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance. Basel: Springer. Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp. Econ., 13, 75-98. Zubek, J. P, ed. (1969). Sensory Deprivation: IS Years ofResearch. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Zuckerman, Μ. (1969). Hallucinations, Reported Sensations, and Images. In J. P. Zubek (ed.). Sensory Deprivation: 15 Years of Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 85-125. Zuckerman, Μ. Cohen, N. (1964). Is suggestion the source of reported visual sensations in perceptual isolation? J. abnorm, soc. Psychol., 68, 655-660. Zuckerman, Μ. Cohen, N. (1964). Sources of Reports of Visual Auditory Sensations in perceptual-isolation experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 61 (1), 1-20. 277
adam_txt	CONTENTS Foreword 9 Introduction: WHAT IS EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY (OF SCIENCE)? (Petr Jedlička) 16 L Theoretical part Chapter 1: PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, AND NEW STYLES OF REASONING (Jitka Paitlová) 40 Chapter 2: TRADITIONAL VERSUS EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE (Jitka Paitlová, Petr Jedlička) 62 Chapter 3: SEPARABILITY AS AN EXPLANATORY TOOL FOR REPLICABILITY (Petr Jedlička) 80 II. Empirical part Chapter 4: OBJECTIVITY IN THE NATURAL SCIENCES FROM THE X-PHI POINT OF VIEW: FINDINGS FROM THE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová).116 Chapter 5: AN EMPIRICAL CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVITY (Petr Jedlička, František Kalvas).152 Chapter 6: HOW SCIENTISTS SOLVE MORAL DILEMMAS (Petr Jedlička, Frantisek Kalvas, Lucie Kubínová, Jitka Paitlová, Petr Petřík, Blanka Vlasáková, Šimon Kos) 177 Chapter 7: FUNDING AND ITS EFFECT ON SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY (Petr Jedlička) 192 IIL Experimental part Chapter 8: DOES CHAMBER REST HAVE EFFECTS ON THE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY? (Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová, Marek Malus, Filip Tylš). 204 In place of a conclusion: SOME PERILS ON THE ROAD AHEAD (Petrjedlička) 240 Summary. 248 Bibliography. 251 SUMMARY Our book presents different perspectives on the problem of the objectivity of the natural sciences. In addition to the traditional philosophical-scientific problem of objectivity, the chapters are also connected by experimental philosophy. The book has three parts. In the first part, we focused on the theoretical analysis of the concept of objectivity, not only in the context of traditional approaches but especially in the context of new possible research within x-phi. We outhned some unexpected trends in the most modern forms ofphilosophy and science - the traditional definition of philosophy and science says that natural sciences refer to possible experience, while philosophy concerns metaphysics, does not affect experience at all. But today, there are very different trends. Some physical theories have a highly theoretical character and cannot be proved by empirical experiments. And a new approach has been developed in philosophy too: experimental philosophy, which makes use of empirical data to inform research on philosophical questions. We argued that these approaches are not contradictions but rather new styles of reasoning. Then we concentrated on the problem of objective knowledge. We analyzed the diversity of the two key classical modern “speculative” approaches to objective knowledge (by Descartes and Kant) within the framework of theoretical considerations independent of empirical research. Then we discussed the phenomenon of the naturalization of the meaning of objectivity (by Popper, Quine, and Bloor). We asserted 248 that this specific trend of naturalization in philosophy has become largely decisive for the importance of objective knowledge. Further, we introduced the analytical term of “separability”, which is conceived as a general concept to explain the degree of replicability across empirical sciences. We showed how separability operates in science to achieve fuller control over experimental situations and we discussed separability in connection with replicability, reproducibility, and other relevant topics, such as generalizability, complexity, the hierarchy of sciences, and scientific explanations. In the second part, we brought together empirical studies to address the problem of obj ectivity that we originally undertook in our research project. Primarily, we situated our research within the context of history and the philosophy of science, and we explained the shift from theoretical to empirical and experimental perspectives on objectivity with the example of transforming a historical account into an investigative tool. In this way, we showed how our research lies at the intersection of three approaches: historical, philosophical, and experimental (empirical), and can thus be classified as integrated history and (experimental) philosophy of science - IH(E)PS. Then we presented our first empirical study - qualitative research on objectivity, which revolved about the questions such as: How is the normative ideal of objectivity defined and what are its philosophical foundations? What functional definitions of this concept do natural scientists use in their work? How is objectivity influenced by various factors operating in science? We obtained the answers from natural scientists in an methodological framework based on sociological methods, namely individual and group interviews (“focus group”). This phase was intended to help operationalize the problem of objectivity in natural science terminology, to identify related problems in contemporary science, and to specify hypotheses for further investigation. For example, we identified three main meaning-dimensions of the objectivity concept, or the distinction between “special” and “general” objectivity. This made it possible to analytically grasp the very different understanding of the concept of objectivity that has emerged in interviews with scientists. 249 Our next empirical study was quantitative, and it delineated the results of the survey that was conducted using a specific x-phi tool: solving moral dilemmas. X-phi typically investigates moral judgements in various groups and settings, for example vignettes are routinely employed to gain insights into decision making in scientific disciplines, such as medicine. We presented data analysis and interpretation of the questionnaire, which was focused on moral judgements in contemporary science relating to topics such as scientific integrity (resistance to questionable publishing practices), biases in science (sensitivity to gender or ethnic stereotypes) and ethical questions (scientific progress). The following chapter dealt with a specific and important factor in the sciences - funding, which can substantially accelerate or impede the development of scientific disciplines. There are numerous examples of this in the past and contemporary science. Our research revealed that the scientists almost unequivocally agree that funding can to some degree affect the objectivity of research, although to a various degree in individual disciplines. The last part of our book introduced an original experiment ֊ an exploratory study on the understanding of reafity among scientists. For the purposes of our study, we employed Chamber REST (Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique), which has been known to produce substantial perceptual effects, such as visual or auditory pseudo hallucinations. We hypothesized that such experiences could alter basic underlying metaphysical beliefs which our subjects-scientists hold about reality. The REST technique showed the potential to induce changes in the scientists, but the outcome depends on the default views ofthe participants. In conclusion, we hope that our work helped to disentangle the meanings of objectivity in the contemporary scientific community and also prove that x-phi methods can be successfully integrated within the traditional philosophical approaches. Moreover, we have introduced a new experimental REST technique into the x-phi methodological toolbox. The data obtained in our research allow further analysis and interpretation, provide a basis for new experiments, and open up new possibilities and ways of solving problems in the philosophy of science. 250 BIBLIOGRAPHY Assessing Science (China). (2015). Nature Outlook, 520,7549, on line: https://www.nature.com/collections/gpwgzsqnj. Adorno, T. W. et al. ( 1972). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Luchterland. Agazzi, E. (2017). The Truth of Theories and Scientific Reahsm, In E. Agazzi (ed.), Varieties of Scientific Realism. Objectivity and Truth in Science. Cham: Springer, 55. Ahlenius, H. Tännsjö, T. (2012). Chinese and Westerners Respond Differently to the Trolley Dilemmas. Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (3-4), 195-201. Albert, H. Topitsch, E., eds. (1971). Werturteilsstreit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Alexander,}. (2012). Experimental philosophy: an introduction. Malden: Polity. Anderson, C. J. et al. (2016). Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science. 351(6277), 1037. Anstey, P. 8c Vanzo A. (2016). Early Modern Experimental Philosophy. In: J. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 87-102. Arabatzis, T. Schickore, J. (2012). Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science, 20 (4), 395-408. Awad, E. 8c Dsouza, S. Kim, R. Schulz, J. Henrich, J. Shariff, A. Bonnefon, J. Rahwan, I. (2018). The Moral Machine Experiment. Nature, 563 (7729), 59-64. 251 Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the hd on reproducibility. Nature 533,452-454. Baker, Μ. (2016). Reproducibility: Respect your cells! Nature 537, 433-435. Baker, Μ. (2016). The Reproducibility Survey Questionnaire. In Baker, Μ. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533,452-454. Retrieved from www.nature.com/news/polopoly_ fs/ 7.36741 !/file/Reproduciblility%20Questionnaire.doc. Barrett, F. S. Griffiths, R. R. (2018). Classic Hallucinogens and Mystical Experiences: Phenomenology and Neural Correlates. Curr Top Behav Neurosci, 36, 393-430. Barrett, F. S. Johnson, Μ. W. Griffiths, R. R. (2015). Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin, ƒ Psychopharmacol, 29, 1182-1190. Begley, C. G. Ellis, L. Μ. (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research: Drug development. Nature, 483 (7391), 531-533. Benda, L. (2011). Historiografická metoda Thomase Kuhna. Teorie vědy/Theory of Science, 33/3.445-468. Bergman, R. G. Danheiser, R. L. (2016). Reproducibility in chemical research. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 55 (41), 12548-12549. Bertuglia, C. S. Vaio, F. (2006). Nonlinearity, chaos, and complexity: the dynamics of natural and social systems. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Bigaj, T. Wuthrich, Ch., eds. (2015). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi. Bishop, D. Gill, E. (2020). Robert Boyle on the importance of reporting and replicating experiments. Journal of the Royal Society ofMedicine, 113 (2), 79-83. Bisson J. McAlpine, J. B. Friesen, J. B. Chen, S. N. Graham, J. Pauli, G. F. (2016). Can Invalid Bioactives Undermine Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery? J Med Chern, 59 (5), 1671-90. Bisson, J. Simmler, C. Chen, S.-N. Friesen, J. B. Lankin, D. C. McAlpine, J. B. Pauli, G. F. (2016). Dissemination of original 252 NMR data enhances reproducibility and integrity in chemical research. Natural Product Reports, 33 (9), 1028-1033. BITSS: Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences (2012). BITSS About. Retrieved from https://www.bitss.org. Blasius, B. Rudolf, L. Weithoff, G. et al. (2020). Long-term cychc persistence in an experimental predator-prey system. Nature, S77,226-230. Bliss, E. L. Clark, L. D. (1962). Visual hallucinations. In L. J. West (ed.). Hallucinations. New York: Grune Stratton, 92-108. Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Blumberg, A. E. Feigl, H. (1931). Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy, XXVIII, 11,281-296. Bohlen, Μ. Hayes, E. R. Bohlen, B. Bailoo, J. D. Crabbe, J. C. Wahlsten, D. (2014). Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol. Behav Brain Res, 272,46-54. Bonnefon, J. Shariff, A. Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352 (6293), 1573-1576. Bryan, Ch. J. Yeager, D. S. O’Brien, J. Μ. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (51), 25535-25545. Buckwaiter, W. (2016). Introduction. In: J. Sytsma, W. Buckwaiter. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 1-2. Bunge, Μ., ed. (1967). Qiiantum Theory and Reality: Studies in the Foundations Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. BerlinHeidelberg-New York: Springer. Button, K. et al. (2ОІЗ). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14,365-376. Cai, L., Friedman, N. Xie, X. S. (2006). Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature, 440,358-362. 253 Camerer, C. F. et al. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351 (6280), 1433-6. Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carnap, R. (2004). Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache. In R. Carnap. Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie und andere metaphysikkritische Schriften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Carnap, R. ( 1932/1959). Elimination of metaphysics through the logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (ed.). Logical positivism. New York: The Free Press, 60-81. Cartwright, N. (1991). Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins. History of Political Economy, 23 (1), 143-155. Castelvecchi, D. (2018). CERN suspends physicist over remarks on gender bias. Nature, NEWS October 1, 2018, on-line: https:// www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06913-0. Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Is String Theory Science? Nature Physics, December 23,2015 (on-line: https://www.scientificamerican . com/article/is-string-theory-science/). Chalmers, D. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapman, S. (2017). The experimental and the empirical: Arne Naess’ statistical approach to philosophy. British Journalfor the History ofPhilosophy, 26 (5), 961-981. Choi, P.J. c Cai, L. Frieda, K. Xie, X.S. (2008). A stochastic single-molecule event triggers phenotype switching of a bacterial cell. Science, 322 (59OO), 442-6. Choules, Μ. P. Klein, Լ. L. Lankin, D. C. McAlpine, J. B. Cho, S. H. Cheng, J. Lee, H. Suh, J. W. 8? Jaki, B. U. Franzblau, S. G. Pauli, G. F. (2018). Residual Complexity Does Impact Organic Chemistry and Drug Discovery: The Case of Rufomyazine and Rufomycin. J Org Chern, 83 (12), 6664-6672. 254 Churchland, P. M. (2013). Platos Camera: How the Physical Brain Captures a Landscape ofAbstract Universals. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Cohen, J. (2019). The untold story of the circle of trust’ behind the world’s first gene-edited babies. Science, August 1, 2019, on-line: https : 11www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/untold-storycircle-trust-behind-world-s-first-gene-edited-babies. Cohen-Boulakia, S. Sc Belhajjame, K. Collin, O., et al. (2017). Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 75,284-298. Colher, A. (2ՕՕՅ). In Defence of Objectivity and Other Essays. London and New York: Routledge. Collin, F. (2OI1). Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer. Comte, A. (1856). Social Physics: From the Positive Philosophy. New York: Calvin Blanchard. Creswell, J. W. (2ՕՕՅ). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History ofArgument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts. London: Duckworth. Crone, E. E. Molofsky, J. (1998). Message in a bottle? Utility and limitations of recent ecological bottle experiments. Integr. Biol., 1, 209-214. Currie, A. (2020). Bottled Understanding: The Role of Lab Work in Ecology. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Currie, A. (2020). Bottled Understanding: The Role ofLab Work in Ecology. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 71 (Յ), 905-932. Cyranoski, D. (2019). The CRISPR-baby scandal: what’s next for human gene-editing. Nature, NEWS FEATURE, February 26, 2019, on-line: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-01900673-1. 255 Cyranoski, D. (2017). The secret war against counterfeit science. Nature, 545,148-150. Dahms, H.-J. (1994). Positivismusstreit. Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Daston, L. Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books. Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dawid, R. (2013). String Theory and the Scientific Method. New York: Cambridge University Press. de Abreu, M. S. Kalueff, A. V. (2021). Of mice and zebrafish: the impact of the experimenter identity on animal behavior. Lab Anim, 50 (7). Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from the Objections and Replies. (Translated and edited by John Cottingham.) Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Lexington (MA): D. C. Heath. Diamond, J. (1983). Ecology: Laboratory, field and natural experiments. Nature, 304, 586-587. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: R. J. Sternberg J. E. Davidson (eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press, 365-395. Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 17 (3), 397-434. Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Edmonds, D. (2015). Would you kill the fat man? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Elowitz, Μ. B. Levine, A. J. Siggia, E. D. Swain, P. S. (2002). Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science, 297, 1183-1186. Evans, S. et al. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in 256 ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15,2,160-170. Everitt, C. W. F. et al. (2011 ). Gravity Probe В : Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett, 106, 221101. Ewald, J. (2003). A Critique for Phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14,291-296. Falk, A. Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Science, 326 (5952), 535-538. Fanelli, D. Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS One, 8 (6), e66938. Fanelli, D. (2018). Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018,115 (11), 2628-2631. Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS One, on-line: https://journals.plos.org/ plosone/article ?id= 10.1371 /journal.pone.0010068. Feltz, A. (2009). Experimental Philosophy. Analyse A Kritik, 31 (2), 201-219. Fischer, E. (2014). Paradox-Psychologie: Kognitive Epistemologie und philosophische Problemlösung. In T. Grundmann, J. Horvath J. Kipper, J. (eds.). Die Experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 322-349. Fisher, Μ. Knobe, J. Strickland, B. Keil, F. (2016). The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity. Cognitive Science, 41 (4), 1119-1134. Fleck, L. (1935/1979). The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Francia, G. Kerbel, R. S. (2010). Raising the bar for cancer therapy models. Nat Biotechnol., 28 (6), 561-2. Francis, K. Howard, C. Howard, I. Gummerum, Μ. 8c Ganis, G. Anderson, G. Terbeek, S. (2016). Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? PLOS ONE, 11 (10), e0170133. 257 Francis, К. В. Terbeek, S. Briazu, R. A. et al. (2017). Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 7 (13954). Franklin, A. (2018). Is It the ‘Same’ Result: Replication in Physics. San Rafael: Morgan Claypool Publishers. Fulong, L. (2009). Discovery of Artemisinin (Qinghaosu). Molecules, 14, 5362-5366. Gali son, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture ofMicrophysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gane, Μ. (2006). Auguste Comte. London: Routledge. Giere, R. (2011). History and Philosophy of Science: Thirty-Five Years Later. In S. Mauskopf 8c T. Schmaltz (eds.). Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer, 59-66. Giere, R. (1990). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach (Science and its conceptualfoundations series). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gigerenzer, G. 8c Brighton, H. (2009). Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1 (1), 107-143. Gilbert, D. T. King, G. Pettigrew, S. Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on “estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science, 351 (6277), 1037-1037. Glock, H. (2009). What is analytic philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goldberger, L. Holt, R. R. ( 1961 ). Experimental interference with reality contact: Individual differences. In P. Solomon et al. (eds.). Sensory deprivation. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 130-142. Greene, J. 8c Nystrom, L. 8c Engeli, A. Darley, J. Cohen, J. (2004). The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment, Neuron, 44 (2), 389-400. Griffiths, A. J. F. 8c Miller, J. H. 8c Suzuki, D. T. et al. (2000). Au Introduction to Genetic Analysis. New York: W. H. Freeman. 258 Discovery of the lac system: negative control. Retrieved from https : /1www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21954/. Griffiths, P. Machery, E. Linquist, S. (2009). The Vernacular Concept of Innateness. Mind Language, 24 (5), 605-630. Griffiths, P. Stotz, К. (2008). Experimental Philosophy of Science. Philosophy Compass, 3 (3), 507-521. Griffiths, R. R. Johnson, Μ. W. Richards, W. A. Richards, B. D. Jesse, R. MacLean, К. A. Barrett, F. S. Cosimano, Μ. P. Klinedinst, Μ. A. (2017). Psilocybin-occasioned mystical-type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors, ƒ Psychopharmacol, 32 (1), 49-69. Griffiths, R. R. Johnson, Μ. W. Carducci, Μ. A. Umbricht, A. Richards, W. A. Richards, B. D. Cosimano, Μ. P. Klinedinst, Μ. A. (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal ofpsychopharmacology, 30, 1181-1197. Grof, S. Goodman, L. E. Richards, W. A. Kurland, A. A. (1973). LSD-assisted psychotherapy in patients with terminal cancer. International pharmacopsychiatry, 8,129-44. Grundmann, T. Horvath, J., Kipper, J., eds. (2014). Die experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Hacking, I. (2012). ‘Language, truth and reason 30 years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43 (4), 599-609. Hacking, I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hacking, I. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking or reasoning: A new analytical tool for historians and philosophers of the sciences. In K. Gavroglu J. Christianidis E. Nicolaidis (eds.). Trends in the historiography of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 31-48. 259 Hacking, L (1992). ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23,1-20. Han, X. Appelbaum, R.P. (2018). China's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot. PLOS One, 13 (4), e0195347. Hannikainen, L R. 8c Machery, E. 8c Rose, D., Stich, S. Olivóla, C. Y. Sousa, R et al. (2019). For whom does determinism undermine moral responsibility? Surveying the conditions for free will across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2428. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Hastings, A. (2020). Long-term predator-prey cycles finally achieved in the lab. Nature, S77,172-173. Hartocollis, A. (2018). The Harvard Bias Suit by Asian-Americans: 5 Key Issues. The New York Times, December 20, 2018, on-line: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/ 12/20/us/harvard-asianamerican-students-discrimination.html. Harwood, J. (1993). Styles of scientific thought: the German genetics community, 1900-1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hawking, S. W. (2005). The Theory of Everything. The Origin and Fate of the Universe. Los Angeles: Phoenix Books. Hebert, P. D. N. 8c Gregory, R. T. (2005). The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54 (5), 852-859. Heisenberg, W. (2007). Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper Perennial. Hempel, C. G. Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15 (2), 135-175. Henrich, J. Heine, S. Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 (2-3), 61-83. Heron, W. . Doane, B. K. Scott, T. H. (1956). Visual disturbances after prolonged perceptual isolation. Can J Psychol, 10 (1), 13-18. Higgins, J. P. (2002). Nonlinear systems in medicine. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 7S (5-6), 247-260. 260 Hindriks, F. (2019). Explanatory Unification in Experimental Philosophy: Let’s Keep It Real. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 10 (1), 219-242. Hocquet, A. Wieher, F. (2021). Epistemic issues in computational reproducibility: software as the elephant in the room. Euro Jnl Phil Sei, 11, 38. Hood, R. W., Jr. (1975). The construction and preliminary vahdation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journalfor the Scientific Study ofReligion, 14,29-41. Hood, R. W. Hill, P. C. Spilka, В. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. С. V. (2016). Examining the specificity of the seductive allure effect. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman J. C. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1829-1834. Philadelphia, PA: Cognitive Science Society. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S. Taylor, J. С. V. (2016). The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition, 155, 67-76. Hopkins, E. J. Weisberg, D. S. Taylor, J. С. V. (2019). Does expertise moderate the seductive allure of reductive explanations? Acta Psychologien, 198. Horgan, J. (2OI5). The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. New York: Basic Books. Horvath, P. Aulner, N. Bielde, Μ. et al. (2016). Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 15, 751-769. Hřebíčková, Μ. Urbánek, T. (2001) NEO pětifaktorový osobnostní inventář (podle NEO Five-Factor Inventory PT Costy a RR McCraee). Praha: Testcentrum. Huang, F. (2018). Quakty deficit behes the hype. Nature, 564 (7735), 70-71. 261 Hunt, К. (1975). Do We Really Need More Rephcations? Psychological Reports, 36, 587-593. Hurlbut, B. (2018). In CRISPRs World: Genome Editing and the Politics of Global Science. In Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society, S. Gibbon, B. Prainsack, S. Hilgartner, J. Lamoreaux (eds.). New York: Routledge. Husserl, E. ( 1963). Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. (Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson.) New York: СоШег Books. Irrlitz, G. (2010). Kant - Handbuch. Stuttgart J. B. Metzler, loannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 645-654. loannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most pubhshed research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2 (8), el24. Iso-Ahola, S. E. (2017). Reproducibility in psychological science: When do psychological phenomena exist? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 879. Jackson, C. W, Jr. Pollard, J. C. ( 1962). Sensory deprivation and suggestion: A theoretical approach. Behav. Set., 7, 332-342. Jasanoff, S. Hurlbut, B. Saha, K. (2015). CRISPRDemocracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology, XXXII, 1, on-line: https://issues.org/ crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusivedehberation/. Jedlička, P. (2020). Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines. Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science, 42 (2), 175-199. Jedlička, P. Kalvas, F. (2021). Theoretical and empirical perspectives on objectivity: Transforming a historical account into an investigative tool, in Integrated History and Philosophy of Science Conference Proceedings. Volume 1(1) [online at UScholarWorks Journals] : https://scholarworks.iu.edu/ journals/index.php/ihps/issue/view/ 2125. Jedlička, P. Paitlová, J. (2019). Objektivita přírodních věd pohledem experimentální filosofie. Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science, 41 (2), 229-258. 262 John, L. К. Loewenstein, G. Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 5, 524-532. Johnson, V. E. Payne, R. D. Wang, T. Asher, A. Mandal, S. (2017). On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112 (517), 1-10. Jura, J. Węgrzyn, P. Jura, J. Koj, A. (2006). Regulatory mechanisms of gene expression: complexity with elements of deterministic chaos. Acta Biochim Pol., 53 (1), 1-10. Kahneman, D. Slovic, R, Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kaiser, Μ. Jug, F. Julou, T. et al. (2018). Monitoring single-cell gene regulation under dynamically controllable conditions with integrated microfluidics and software. Nat Commun, 9, 212. Kant, I. ( 1998). Critique ofpure reason. (Translated and edited by P. Guyer A. W. Wood.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kaupinnen, A. (2007). The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10 (2), 95 - 118. Kavková, V. Malus, M. (2021). Possible Applications of Flotation-REST and its Effects on Human Psychophysiology Regarding Stress, Anxiety and Depression. Psychology and its Contexts, 12 (1), 5-21. Kelemen, D. Rottman, J. Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142 (4), 1074-1083. Kjellgren, A. Lyden, F. Norlander, T. (2008). Sensory Isolation in Flotation Tanks: Altered States of Consciousness and Effects on Well-being. The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), 636-656. Kjellgren, A. 8c Sundequist, U. Sundholm, U. Norlander, T. Archer, T. (2003). Altered consciousness in flotation-REST and chamber-REST: Experience of experimental pain and subjective stress. Social Behavior and Personality, 32,103-115. 263 Klahr, D. Dunbar, К. (2000). Coordinating Dual Search: The Role of Evidence. In: D. Klahr, Exploring Science. The Cognition and Development ofDiscovery Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 61-82. Kipling, W. W. 8c Mishler, B. D. Wheeler, Q. D. (2005). The Perils of DNA Barcoding and the Need for Integrative Taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54 (5), 844-851. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science. Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press. Knobe, J. (2021). Philosophical Intuitions Are Surprisingly Stable Across both Demographic Groups and Situations. Filozofia Nauki, 29 (2), 11-76. Knobe, J. (2016). Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science. In Justin Sytsma Wesley Buckwaiter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Blackwell. Knobe, J. (2015). Philosophers are doing something different now: Quantitative data. Cognition, 135,36-38. Knobe, J. (2004). What is experimental Philosophy? The Philosophers' Magazine, 28,37-39. Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (2008): An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto. In J. Knobe 8c S. Nichols (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Knobe, J. Samuels, R. (2013). Thinking like a scientist: Innateness as a case study. Cognition, 126 (1), 72-86. Kohler, R. E. (2002). Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the LabField Border in Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1962/1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (IL) : University of Chicago Press. Kupka, M. Malus, M. Charvát, M. (2019). Terapie tmou: Katamnestická studie. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Kupka, Μ. 8c Malus, M. Kavková, V. Řehan, V. (2012). Technika omezené zevní stimulace. Československá Psychologie, 56 (5), 488-499. Lacey, H. (1999). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Routledge. 264 Lakatos, L ( 1971 ). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions, In R. Buck R. S. Cohen (eds.). PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970. Dordrecht: D. Reidi, 91-108. Lal, S. Li, A., dos Remedios, C. (2016). Limitations in Translating Animal Studies to Humans in Cardiovascular Disease. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res, 9, 165-166. Latour, B. Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Lau, Ch.-F. (2016). A Deflationary Approach to Hegels Metaphysics. In A. de Laurentiis (ed.). Hegel and Metaphysics. On Logic and Ontology in the System. Berhn/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 27-42. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press. Laughlin, R. B. Sc Pines, D. (2000). The Theory of Everything. Proceedings of the National Academiy of Science of the United States ofAmerica, 97 (1), 28-31. LeBel, E. P. Berger, D. Campbell, L., Sc Loving, T. J. (2017). Falsifiability is not optional. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (2), 254-261. Leff, J. (1968). Perceptual Phenomena and Personality in Sensory Deprivation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114 (517), 1499-1508. Levitt, S. D., Sc List, J. A. (2007). Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian Journal ofEconomics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 40, 347-370. Lexchin, J. (2012). Sponsorship bias in clinical research. NCBI, 24 (4), 233-242. Libby, P. (2015). Murine ‘Model’ Monotheism. Circulation Research, 117(11), 921-925. Liechti, Μ. Dolder, P. C. Schmid, Y. (2017). Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 234 (9/10), 1499-1510. 265 Lilly, J. C. ( 1956). Mental effects of reduction of ordinary levels of physical stimuli on intact, healthy persons. Psychiatric Research Reports, 5,1-9. Lilly, J. C. (1978). The Scientist: A Novel Autobiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott. Lilly, J. C. 8c Enright, C. S. (1977). The Deep Self: Profound Relaxation. and the Tank Isolation Technique. New York: Simon and Schuster. Linquist, S. . Machery, E. 8c Griffiths, P. Stotz, К. (2011). Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366 (1563), 444-453. List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 115 (З), 482-492. Locke, J. (1788). An essay concerning human understanding. London: J. F. and C. Rivington. Ludwig, A. Μ. (1966). Altered States of Consciousness. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 15 (З), 225-234. Machery, E. (2016). Experimental Philosophy of Science. In A Companion to Experimental Philosophy,]. Sytsma, W. Buckwaiter (eds.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 475-490. Machery, E. Griffiths, P. Linquist, S. Stotz, К. (2019). Scientists’ concepts of innateness: evolution or attraction? In D. A. Wilkenfeld R. Samuels (eds.). Advances in experimental philosophy of science. Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London; New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 172-201. Machery, E., O’Neill, E. (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. New York: Routledge. MacLean, К. A. Leoutsakos, J. Μ. S. Johnson, Μ. W. Griffiths, R. R. (2012). Factor Analysis of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire: A Study of Experiences Occasioned by the Hallucinogen Psilocybin. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51 (4), 721-737. Maco, R. (2021). Naturalism and the task of philosophy. Filosofický časopis, 69 (Special issue З), 44-61. 266 Maienschein, J. (1991). Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880-1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Majić, T. Schmidt, T. T. Gallinat, J. (2015). Peak experiences and the afterglow phenomenon: when and how do therapeutic effects of hallucinogens depend on psychedelic experiences? JPsychopharmacol, 29 (З), 241-53. Malte, C. E. Holdrege, C. (2005). More Taxonomy, Not DNA Barcoding. BioScience, 55 (10), 822-824. Marvin, Μ. (1969). Hallucinations, Reported Sensations, and Images. In J. P. Zubek, (ed.). Sensory Deprivation: IS Years of Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 85-125. Maslow, A. H. (1964). Religions, values, and peak experiences. London: Penguin Books Limited. Mason, O. Brady, F. (2009). The psychotomimetic effects of short-term sensory deprivation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197 (10), 783-785. Matsubara, K. (2013). Realism, underdetermination and string theory dualities. Synthese, 190 (З), 471-489. Maudhn, T. (2007). The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meng, X. Y. Zhang, H. X. Mezei, Μ. Cui, Μ. (2011). Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 7 (2), 146-157. Merton, R. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merton, R. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press. Mohr, P. (2017). Appendix. In NSF: Robustness, Reliability and Reproducibility in Scientific Research Report (Workshop National Science Foundation), 25-25. Retrieved from http://www.mrsec. harvard.edu/2017NSFReliability/include/NSF_Workshop_ Robustness.Rehability.Reproducibility.Report.pdf. Montévil, Μ. (2019). Measurement in biology is methodized by theory. Biol Philos, 34,35. 267 Mullane, К. Curtis, M. J. Wilhams Μ., eds. (2017). Research in the Biomedical Sciences Transparent and Reproducible. London: Academic Press. Muntean, I. (2015). A Metaphysics from String Dualities: Pluralism, Fundamentalism, Modality. In T. Bigaj Ch. Wuthrich (eds.). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi, 259-292. Murphy, D. B. Myers, T. I. Smith, S. ( 1963). Reported visual sensations as a function of sustained sensory deprivation and social isolation. USA Leadership HRU Draft res. Rep., Presidio of Monterey (Pioneer VI). Murphy, T. (2OI5). Experimental Philosophy, 1935-1965. In: J. Knobe, T. Lombrozo S. Nichols, Oxford studies in experimental philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 325-368. Myers, T. I. Murphy, D. B. (1962). Reported visual sensation during brief exposure to reduced sensory input. In L. J. West (ed.). Hallucinations. New York: Grune Stratton, 118-124. Mynatt, C. Doherty, Μ. Tweney, R. (1977). Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(l),85-95. NASEM: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2OI9). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nadelhoffer, T. Nahmias, E. (2007). The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10 (2), 123-149. Naess, A. (1938). "Truth" as Conceived by Those who are Not Professional Philosophers. Oslo: Komm. Dybwad. Nagel, T. (1989). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press. Nemeth, E. (2OIO). An Improbable Case Of Philosophy: Arne Naess Between - Empiricism, Existentialism And Metaphysics. In: J. Manninen F. Stadler (eds.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14: 268 The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries- Networks and Transformations of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer, 281-292. Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press. Neuliep, J. W. Crandall, R. (1993). Reviewer bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21-29. Nisbett, R. E. 8c Peng, K. Choi, I. Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108,291-310. Norlander, T. 8c Kjellgren, A. Archer, T. (2000). The Experience of Flotation-Rest as a Function of Setting and Previous Experience of Altered State of Consciousness. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20 (2), 161-178. Norlander, T. Kjellgren, A. Archer, T. (2003). Effects of Flotation-Versus Chamber-Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique (Rest) on Creativity and Realism under Stress and Non-Stress Conditions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22 (4), 343-359. Normile, D. (2017). China cracks down after investigation finds massive peer-review fraud. Science, on-line: https://www.science. org/ content/article/china-cracks-down-after-investigation-findsmassive-peer-review-fraud Nosek В. A., Errington T. Μ. (2020). The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it. Nature, 583, 518-520. Nosek В. A., Errington, T. Μ. (2017). Making sense of replications. eLife, 6, e23383. Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. NSF: National Science Foundation (2017). Robustness, Reliability and Reproducibility in Scientific Research Report (Workshop National Science Foundation). Retrieved from http://www.mrsec. 269 harvard.edu/2017NSFReliability/include/NS F_Workshop_ Robustness.Reliabihty.Reproducibihty.Report.pdf. NSF: National Science Foundation (2015). Social, Behavioral, and Economie Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science. Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. Retrieved from https://www. nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_ Research_Report.pdf Odenbaugh, J. (2006). Message in the Bottle: The Constraints of Experimentation on Model Building. Philosophy of Science, 73 (5). OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2013). Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, https://osf.io/e81x1/. OSC: Open Science Collaboration (2015). Reproducibility Project: Psychology, https://osf.io/ezcuj/. Pahnke, W. N. Kurland, A. A. Goodman, L. E. Richards, W. A. (1969). LSD-assisted psychotherapy with terminal cancer patients. Current psychiatric therapies, 9,144-52. Penders, B. Horstman, K. Vos, R. (2008). Walking the Line between Lab and Computation: The ,Moisť Zone. BioScience, 58, 8. Penrose, R. (1996). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pernet, C., Pohne, J. B. (2015). Improving functional magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility. GigaScience, 4 (15). Plato (1969). Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. 5 6. (Translated by P. Shorey.) Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Popper, K. (2009). The Two Fundamental Problems of the Theory of Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge. Popper, K. R. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge. Popper, K. (1994). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 270 Popper, К. (1989). Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. In T. W. Adorno et al. Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Luchterhand, 103-123. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper. Price, D. J. S. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149 (3683), 510-515. Prinz, J. J. (2008). Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy. In J. Knobe S. Nichols (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Prinz, F. Schlange, T. Asadullah, K. (2011). Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov, 10, 712. Putnam, H. (1991). Representation and Reality. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Quine, W. V. O. (1992). Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Qpine, W. V. O. (1981). Theoriesand Things. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Quine, W. V. O. ( 1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. Rad, Μ. S. Martingano, A. J. Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115 (45), 11401-11405. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rescher, N. (1997). Objectivity: The Obligations of Impersonal Reason. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press. Robinson, B. Gonnerman, C. O’Rourke, Μ. (2019). Experimental Philosophy of Science and Philosophical Differences across the Sciences. Philosophy of Science, 86 (3), 551-576. 271 Rogers, К. (2005). On the Metaphysics ofExperimental Physics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Romero, F. (2OI9). Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 14, ЄІ2633. Rorty, R. (1998). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rose, D. Danks, D. (2013). In Defense of a Broad Conception of Experimental Philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 44 (4), 512-532. Rosenthal, N. Brown, S. (2007). The mouse ascending: Perspectives for human-disease models. Nature Cell Biology, 9, 993-999. Ross, S. Bossis, A. Guss, J. Agin-Liebes, G. Malone, T. Cohen, B. Mennenga, S. E. Belser, A. Kalliontzi, K. Babb, J. Su, Z. Corby, P. Schmidt, B. L. (2016). Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Journal ofpsychopharmacology, 30, 1165-1180. Rossi, A. Μ. Sturrock, J. B. Solomon, P. (1963). Suggestion effects on reported imagery in sensory deprivation. Percept, mot. Skills, 16,39-45. Sabroe, I. Dockrell, D. H. Vogel, S. N. Renshaw, S. A. Whyte, Μ. K. Dower, S. K. (2007). Identifying and hurdling obstacles to translational research. Nat Rev Immunol, 7(1), 77-82. Sanbonmatsu, D. Μ. Cooley, E. H. Butner, J. E. (2021). The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science. Front Psychol, 11,580111. Sarkissian, H. 8c Chatterjee, A. de Brigard, F. Knobe, J. 8c Nichols, S. 8c Sirker, S. (2010). Is Belief in Free Will a Cultural Universal? Mind and Language, 25 (З), 346-358. Sawinski, D. Maltzman, J. S. (2015). Do mice need an order of fries to be relevant for transplant studies? American Journal of Transplantation, 15,2282-4. 272 Schenberg, E. E. (2018). Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy: A Paradigm Shift in Psychiatric Research and Development. Front. Pharmacol, 9,733. Schindler, S. K. (forthcoming): Theoretical Virtues: do scientists think what philosophers think they ought to think? Philosophy of Science. Schultz, D. P. (1965). Sensory Restriction. Effects on Behaviour. New York and London: Academic Press. Segall, M. H. Campbell, D. T. Herskovits, M. J. (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Seyhan, A. (2019). Lost in translation: the valley of death across preclinical and clinical divide - identification of problems and overcoming obstacles. Translational Medicine Communications, 4 (18). Shapin, S. Schaffer, S. (1989). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shekhar, C. (2008). In silico pharmacology: computer-aided methods could transform drug development. Chern Biol., 15 (5), 413-4. Shore, E. (1971). Sensory deprivation, preconscious processes and scientific thinking. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41,574-580. Siebert, S. Machesky, L. Μ. Insali, R. H. (2015). Overflow in science and its implications for trust. eLife, 14,4, ЄІ0825. Simon, H. Cohen, R. Wartofsky, Μ. (1977). Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Śmigielski, L. 8л Kometer, Μ. Scheidegger, M. Krähenmann, R. Huber, T. Vollenweider, F. X. (2019). Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-13. Smolin, L. (2006). The Trouble with Physics. The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Solomon, Μ. (2001). Social Empiricism. Cambridge: MIT Press. 273 Sorge, R. Martin, L. Isbester, К. et al. (2014). Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents. Nat Methods, 11, 629-632. Sosa, E. (2007). Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Studies: An International Journalfor Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 132 (1), 99-107. Sprat, T. ( 1667). The history of the Royal-Society ofLondon for the improving of natural knowledge. London. Staley, J. T. (2006). The bacterial species dilemma and the genomicphylogenetic species concept. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 361,1899-1909. Sterelny, K. Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy ofBiology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sterne, J. A., Davey, S. G. (2001). Sifting the evidence - what’s wrong with significance tests? TheBMJ, 322 (7280), 226-31. Stotz, К. Griffiths, P. (2004). Genes, “Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test“. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 26 ( 1 ), 5-28. Stotz, К. Griffiths, P. Knight, R. (2004). How biologists conceptualize genes: an empirical study. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35 (4), 647-673. Studerus, E. Gamma, A. Kometer, Μ. Vollenweider, F. X. (2OI2). Prediction of psilocybin response in healthy volunteers. PLOS One, 7 (2), e30800. Suedfeld, P. ( 1980). Restricted environmental stimulation: Research and clinical applications. New York: John Wiley Sons. Suedfeld, P. Borrie, R. A. (1999). Health and therapeutic applications of chamber and flotation restricted environmental stimulation therapy (REST). Psychology Health, 14 (З), 545-566. Suedfeld, P. Coren, S. (1989). Perceptual isolation, sensory deprivation, and rest: Moving introductory psychology texts out of the 1950s. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 30 (1), 17-29. 274 Suedfeld, P. Eich, E. (1995). Autobiographical memory and affect under conditions of reduced environmental stimulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15,321-326. Suedfeld, P. Metcalfe, J. Bluck, S. (1987). Enhancement of scientific creativity by flotation REST (restricted environmental stimulation technique). Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 7 (З), 219-231. Suedfeld, P. Rank, A. D. Malus, Μ. (2018). Spontaneous mental experiences in extreme and unusual environments. In K. Christoff K. C. R. Fox (eds.). The Oxford handbook of spontaneus thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming (Vol. 1 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stace, W. T. (1961). Mysticism and philosophy. London: Macmillan. Sweedler, J. V. (2015). Striving for Reproducible Science, Analytical Chemistry, 87 (23), 11603-11604. Sytsma, J. Buckwaiter, W., eds. (2016). A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. Sytsma, J. c Livengood, J. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. Ontario: Broadview Press Ltd. Täuber, S. von Lieres, E. Grünberger, A. (2020). Dynamic Environmental Control in Microfluidic Single-Cell Cultivations: From Concepts to Applications. Small, 16,1906670. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Thurner, S. . Hanel, R. A. Klimek, P. (2019). Introduction to the theory of complex systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. van der Valk, J. Bieback K., Buta, C. Cochrane, B. Dirks, W. G. Fu, J. Hickman, J. J. Hohensee, C. et al. (2018). Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS): Past - Present - Future. ALTEX, 35 (1), 99-118. Viktorinová, Μ. Tylš, F. (2016). Nevědomé procesy lidské myslipoznatky z psychedelického výzkumu. Psychiatrie, 20 (2), 100-107. 275 Vinkers, CH. H. Tijdink, J. К. Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. BMJ, 351, 6467. Voelkl, B. Altman N. S. Forsman, A. et al. (2020). Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nat Rev Neurosci, 21, 384-393. Vohlídalová, M. 8c Linková, Μ., eds. (2017). Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. Vollenweider, F. X. Geyer, Μ. A. (2001). A systems model of altered consciousness: Integrating natural and drug-induced psychoses. Brain Research Bulletin, 56 (5), 495-507. Wakabayashi, D. (2020). Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam [online] New York Times. Source: www.nytimes.eom/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverlessfatality.html. Wason, P. ( I960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 12 (3), 129-140. Weber, Μ. (1988). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wisssenschaftslehre. (Herausgegeben von Johannes Winckelmann.) Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Weinberg,}. Μ. (2016). Going Positive by Going Negative: On Keeping X-Phi Relevant Dangerous. In: J. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter, A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 71-86. Weinberg,}. Nichols, S. Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29 (1/2), 429-460. Wilkenfeld, D. Samuels, R. A., eds. (2019). Advances in experimental philosophy of science. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Williams, Ch. (2019). On ‘modified human agents’: }ohn Lilly and the paranoid style in American neuroscience. History of the Human Sciences, 32, 84-107. Williamson, T. (2016). Philosophical Criticisms of Experimental Philosophy. In}. Sytsma W. Buckwaiter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, 22-36. New York: Blackwell. 276 Woit, P. (2006). Not Even Wrong. The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challange to Unify the Laws ofPhysics. London: Jonathan Cape. Wright, J. H. (1906). The Origin of Plato’s Cave. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 17,131-142. Wyller, E. A. (1970). The late Plato: Tübingen Lectures. Hamburg: Meiner. XRP: X-Phi Rephcability Project (2018). Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy. Review ofPhilosophy and Psychology (1), 1-36. Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology. Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance. Basel: Springer. Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp. Econ., 13, 75-98. Zubek, J. P, ed. (1969). Sensory Deprivation: IS Years ofResearch. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Zuckerman, Μ. (1969). Hallucinations, Reported Sensations, and Images. In J. P. Zubek (ed.). Sensory Deprivation: 15 Years of Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 85-125. Zuckerman, Μ. Cohen, N. (1964). Is suggestion the source of reported visual sensations in perceptual isolation? J. abnorm, soc. Psychol., 68, 655-660. Zuckerman, Μ. Cohen, N. (1964). Sources of Reports of Visual Auditory Sensations in perceptual-isolation experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 61 (1), 1-20. 277
any_adam_object	1
any_adam_object_boolean	1
author	Jedlička, Petr Paitlová, Jitka 1988-
author_GND	(DE-588)1297243587 (DE-588)1148291350
author_facet	Jedlička, Petr Paitlová, Jitka 1988-
author_role	aut aut
author_sort	Jedlička, Petr
author_variant	p j pj j p jp
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV049028335
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)1392141859 (DE-599)BVBBV049028335
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02335nam a2200445 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049028335</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230727 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230630s2022 ad\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788074655524</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-7465-552-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1392141859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049028335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="h">cze</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jedlička, Petr</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1297243587</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity</subfield><subfield code="c">Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Červený Kostelec</subfield><subfield code="b">Pavel Mervart</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">277 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustration, Diagramme, Tabellen (farbig)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 251-277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text und Zusammenfassung englisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Experimentalphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4719507-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Experimentalphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4719507-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paitlová, Jitka</subfield><subfield code="d">1988-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1148291350</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230727</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034291090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id	DE-604.BV049028335
illustrated	Illustrated
index_date	2024-07-03T22:15:55Z
indexdate	2024-07-10T09:53:12Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9788074655524
language	English Czech
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034291090
oclc_num	1392141859
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-12
owner_facet	DE-12
physical	277 Seiten Illustration, Diagramme, Tabellen (farbig) 21 cm
psigel	BSB_NED_20230727
publishDate	2022
publishDateSearch	2022
publishDateSort	2022
publisher	Pavel Mervart
record_format	marc
spelling	Jedlička, Petr Verfasser (DE-588)1297243587 aut Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al. Červený Kostelec Pavel Mervart 2022 277 Seiten Illustration, Diagramme, Tabellen (farbig) 21 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverzeichnis Seite 251-277 Text und Zusammenfassung englisch Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd rswk-swf Experimentalphilosophie (DE-588)4719507-1 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s Experimentalphilosophie (DE-588)4719507-1 s Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 s DE-604 Paitlová, Jitka 1988- Verfasser (DE-588)1148291350 aut Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis
spellingShingle	Jedlička, Petr Paitlová, Jitka 1988- Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd Experimentalphilosophie (DE-588)4719507-1 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4172310-7 (DE-588)4719507-1
title	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
title_auth	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
title_exact_search	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
title_exact_search_txtP	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
title_full	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al.
title_fullStr	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al.
title_full_unstemmed	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity Petr Jedlička, Jitka Paitlová et al.
title_short	Experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
title_sort	experimental philosophy and the problem of objectivity
topic	Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd Experimentalphilosophie (DE-588)4719507-1 gnd
topic_facet	Philosophie Objektivität Experimentalphilosophie
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034291090&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT jedlickapetr experimentalphilosophyandtheproblemofobjectivity AT paitlovajitka experimentalphilosophyandtheproblemofobjectivity

Holdings

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection! Indexes

MARC

Record in the Search Index

There is no print copy available.

Similar Items