The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929:
Prologue : the long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Sup...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Lawrence, Kansas
University Press of Kansas
[2022]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Landmark law cases & American society
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | Prologue : the long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987 -- Conclusion. "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"-- |
| Beschreibung: | xiv, 171 Seiten 22 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780700633395 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049026372 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230809 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230629s2022 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780700633395 |c (paperback) |9 978-0-7006-3339-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1347209505 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1789750369 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73062 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lurie, Jonathan |d 1939- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)151207844 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |c Jonathan Lurie |
| 264 | 1 | |a Lawrence, Kansas |b University Press of Kansas |c [2022] | |
| 300 | |a xiv, 171 Seiten |c 22 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Landmark law cases & American society | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Prologue : the long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987 -- Conclusion. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"-- | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pocket veto United States Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cases | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Indianer |0 (DE-588)4026718-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Veto |0 (DE-588)4342676-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Okanogan County, Wash. |0 (DE-588)7667369-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | |a Indians of North America Legal status, laws, etc. Cases | ||
| 653 | |a Okanogan, Methow, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake | ||
| 653 | |a Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929) | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Indianer |0 (DE-588)4026718-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Veto |0 (DE-588)4342676-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Okanogan County, Wash. |0 (DE-588)7667369-8 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-188 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-7006-3340-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780700633395.pdf |v 2022-10-19 |x Aggregator |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034289170 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804185307369701376 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Lurie, Jonathan 1939- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)151207844 |
| author_facet | Lurie, Jonathan 1939- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lurie, Jonathan 1939- |
| author_variant | j l jl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049026372 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1347209505 (DE-599)KXP1789750369 |
| dewey-full | 342.73062 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73062 |
| dewey-search | 342.73062 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73062 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03373nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049026372</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230809 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230629s2022 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780700633395</subfield><subfield code="c">(paperback)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7006-3339-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1347209505</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1789750369</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73062</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lurie, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="d">1939-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)151207844</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929</subfield><subfield code="c">Jonathan Lurie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lawrence, Kansas</subfield><subfield code="b">University Press of Kansas</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiv, 171 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">22 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Landmark law cases & American society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prologue : the long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987 -- Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pocket veto United States Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indianer</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026718-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Veto</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4342676-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Okanogan County, Wash.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7667369-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Indians of North America Legal status, laws, etc. Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Okanogan, Methow, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indianer</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026718-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Veto</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4342676-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Okanogan County, Wash.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7667369-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-7006-3340-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780700633395.pdf</subfield><subfield code="v">2022-10-19</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034289170</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Okanogan County, Wash. (DE-588)7667369-8 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA Okanogan County, Wash. |
| id | DE-604.BV049026372 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:15:14Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:53:09Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780700633395 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034289170 |
| oclc_num | 1347209505 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | xiv, 171 Seiten 22 cm |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | University Press of Kansas |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Landmark law cases & American society |
| spelling | Lurie, Jonathan 1939- Verfasser (DE-588)151207844 aut The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 Jonathan Lurie Lawrence, Kansas University Press of Kansas [2022] xiv, 171 Seiten 22 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Landmark law cases & American society Prologue : the long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987 -- Conclusion. "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"-- Pocket veto United States Cases United States Cases Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd rswk-swf Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd rswk-swf Indianer (DE-588)4026718-0 gnd rswk-swf Veto (DE-588)4342676-1 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Okanogan County, Wash. (DE-588)7667369-8 gnd rswk-swf Indians of North America Legal status, laws, etc. Cases Okanogan, Methow, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929) Indianer (DE-588)4026718-0 s USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 s Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 s Veto (DE-588)4342676-1 s Okanogan County, Wash. (DE-588)7667369-8 g DE-188 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-7006-3340-1 https://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780700633395.pdf 2022-10-19 Aggregator Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Lurie, Jonathan 1939- The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 Pocket veto United States Cases United States Cases Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd Indianer (DE-588)4026718-0 gnd Veto (DE-588)4342676-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4139832-4 (DE-588)4047577-3 (DE-588)4026718-0 (DE-588)4342676-1 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)7667369-8 |
| title | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |
| title_auth | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |
| title_exact_search | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |
| title_full | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 Jonathan Lurie |
| title_fullStr | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 Jonathan Lurie |
| title_full_unstemmed | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 Jonathan Lurie |
| title_short | The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 |
| title_sort | the unusual story of the pocket veto case 1926 1929 |
| topic | Pocket veto United States Cases United States Cases Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd Indianer (DE-588)4026718-0 gnd Veto (DE-588)4342676-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Pocket veto United States Cases United States Cases Rechtsstreit Prozess Indianer Veto USA Okanogan County, Wash. |
| url | https://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780700633395.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT luriejonathan theunusualstoryofthepocketvetocase19261929 |