A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology:
The extraxial-axial theory (EAT) and universal elemental homology (UEH) are often portrayed as mutually exclusive hypotheses of homology within pentaradiate Echinodermata. EAT describes homology upon the echinoderm bauplan, interpreted through early post-metamorphic growth and growth zones, dividing...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
[2023]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge elements
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | The extraxial-axial theory (EAT) and universal elemental homology (UEH) are often portrayed as mutually exclusive hypotheses of homology within pentaradiate Echinodermata. EAT describes homology upon the echinoderm bauplan, interpreted through early post-metamorphic growth and growth zones, dividing it into axial regions generally associated with elements of the ambulacral system and extraxial regions that are not. UEH describes the detailed construction of the axial skeleton, dividing it into homologous plates and plate series based on symmetry, early growth, and function. These hypotheses are not in conflict; the latter is rooted in refinement of the former. Some interpretive differences arise because many of the morphologies described from eleutherozoan development are difficult to reconcile with Paleozoic forms. Conversely, many elements described for Paleozoic taxa by UEH, such as the peristomial border plates, are absent in eleutherozoans. This Element recommends these two hypotheses be used together to generate a better understanding of homology across Echinodermata |
Beschreibung: | 44 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
ISBN: | 9781009397179 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049003231 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 230615s2023 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781009397179 |c pbk. |9 978-1-009-39717-9 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1385286691 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049003231 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 563/.9 | |
100 | 1 | |a Sumrall, Colin D. |d 1967- |0 (DE-588)1288740549 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |c Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere] |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c [2023] | |
300 | |a 44 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge elements | |
520 | |a The extraxial-axial theory (EAT) and universal elemental homology (UEH) are often portrayed as mutually exclusive hypotheses of homology within pentaradiate Echinodermata. EAT describes homology upon the echinoderm bauplan, interpreted through early post-metamorphic growth and growth zones, dividing it into axial regions generally associated with elements of the ambulacral system and extraxial regions that are not. UEH describes the detailed construction of the axial skeleton, dividing it into homologous plates and plate series based on symmetry, early growth, and function. These hypotheses are not in conflict; the latter is rooted in refinement of the former. Some interpretive differences arise because many of the morphologies described from eleutherozoan development are difficult to reconcile with Paleozoic forms. Conversely, many elements described for Paleozoic taxa by UEH, such as the peristomial border plates, are absent in eleutherozoans. This Element recommends these two hypotheses be used together to generate a better understanding of homology across Echinodermata | ||
650 | 4 | |a Echinodermata, Fossil | |
650 | 4 | |a Echinodermata / Evolution | |
650 | 4 | |a Evolutionary paleobiology | |
650 | 4 | |a Paleobiology / Methodology | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034266391 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804185268659421184 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Sumrall, Colin D. 1967- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1288740549 |
author_facet | Sumrall, Colin D. 1967- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Sumrall, Colin D. 1967- |
author_variant | c d s cd cds |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049003231 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1385286691 (DE-599)BVBBV049003231 |
dewey-full | 563/.9 |
dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-ones | 563 - Fossil marine & seashore invertebrates |
dewey-raw | 563/.9 |
dewey-search | 563/.9 |
dewey-sort | 3563 19 |
dewey-tens | 560 - Paleontology |
discipline | Geologie / Paläontologie |
discipline_str_mv | Geologie / Paläontologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02203nam a2200349zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049003231</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230615s2023 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009397179</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-39717-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1385286691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049003231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">563/.9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sumrall, Colin D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1288740549</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology</subfield><subfield code="c">Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2023]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge elements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The extraxial-axial theory (EAT) and universal elemental homology (UEH) are often portrayed as mutually exclusive hypotheses of homology within pentaradiate Echinodermata. EAT describes homology upon the echinoderm bauplan, interpreted through early post-metamorphic growth and growth zones, dividing it into axial regions generally associated with elements of the ambulacral system and extraxial regions that are not. UEH describes the detailed construction of the axial skeleton, dividing it into homologous plates and plate series based on symmetry, early growth, and function. These hypotheses are not in conflict; the latter is rooted in refinement of the former. Some interpretive differences arise because many of the morphologies described from eleutherozoan development are difficult to reconcile with Paleozoic forms. Conversely, many elements described for Paleozoic taxa by UEH, such as the peristomial border plates, are absent in eleutherozoans. This Element recommends these two hypotheses be used together to generate a better understanding of homology across Echinodermata</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Echinodermata, Fossil</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Echinodermata / Evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary paleobiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Paleobiology / Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034266391</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049003231 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T22:10:07Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:52:32Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781009397179 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034266391 |
oclc_num | 1385286691 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-29 |
physical | 44 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
publishDate | 2023 |
publishDateSearch | 2023 |
publishDateSort | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge elements |
spelling | Sumrall, Colin D. 1967- (DE-588)1288740549 aut A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere] Cambridge Cambridge University Press [2023] 44 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cambridge elements The extraxial-axial theory (EAT) and universal elemental homology (UEH) are often portrayed as mutually exclusive hypotheses of homology within pentaradiate Echinodermata. EAT describes homology upon the echinoderm bauplan, interpreted through early post-metamorphic growth and growth zones, dividing it into axial regions generally associated with elements of the ambulacral system and extraxial regions that are not. UEH describes the detailed construction of the axial skeleton, dividing it into homologous plates and plate series based on symmetry, early growth, and function. These hypotheses are not in conflict; the latter is rooted in refinement of the former. Some interpretive differences arise because many of the morphologies described from eleutherozoan development are difficult to reconcile with Paleozoic forms. Conversely, many elements described for Paleozoic taxa by UEH, such as the peristomial border plates, are absent in eleutherozoans. This Element recommends these two hypotheses be used together to generate a better understanding of homology across Echinodermata Echinodermata, Fossil Echinodermata / Evolution Evolutionary paleobiology Paleobiology / Methodology Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe |
spellingShingle | Sumrall, Colin D. 1967- A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology Echinodermata, Fossil Echinodermata / Evolution Evolutionary paleobiology Paleobiology / Methodology |
title | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
title_auth | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
title_exact_search | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
title_exact_search_txtP | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
title_full | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere] |
title_fullStr | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere] |
title_full_unstemmed | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology Colin D. Sumrall [und vier andere] |
title_short | A review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
title_sort | a review and evaluation of homology hypotheses in echinoderm paleobiology |
topic | Echinodermata, Fossil Echinodermata / Evolution Evolutionary paleobiology Paleobiology / Methodology |
topic_facet | Echinodermata, Fossil Echinodermata / Evolution Evolutionary paleobiology Paleobiology / Methodology |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sumrallcolind areviewandevaluationofhomologyhypothesesinechinodermpaleobiology |