European patent law: the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin
<<De>> Gruyter
2023
|
| Schriftenreihe: | De Gruyter Reference
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110774016 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXXII, 558 Seiten 24 cm x 17 cm |
| ISBN: | 9783110774016 3110774011 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048987333 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240201 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 230605s2023 gw |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 015 | |a 23,N15 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 1285329716 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9783110774016 |c hardcover: EUR 198.00 (DE) (freier Preis), EUR 198.00 (AT) (freier Preis) |9 978-3-11-077401-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 3110774011 |9 3-11-077401-1 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783110774016 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1409104279 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1285329716 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c XA-DE-BE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-19 |a DE-11 | ||
| 084 | |a PS 3800 |0 (DE-625)139790: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |8 1\p |a 340 |2 23sdnb | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European patent law |b the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |c Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b <<De>> Gruyter |c 2023 | |
| 300 | |a XXXII, 558 Seiten |c 24 cm x 17 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a De Gruyter Reference | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Patentrecht |0 (DE-588)4044884-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | |a EU Patent | ||
| 653 | |a Patent Law | ||
| 653 | |a Unified Patent Court | ||
| 653 | |a Community Patent | ||
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Patentrecht |0 (DE-588)4044884-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Matthews, Duncan |d 1965- |0 (DE-588)171098218 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Torremans, Paul |d 1965- |0 (DE-588)124315070 |4 edt | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |0 (DE-588)10095502-2 |4 pbl | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB |z 978-3-11-078171-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 978-3-11-078168-7 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m X:MVB |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110774016 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034250730&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a vlb |d 20230404 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034250730 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820143340269600768 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS,
PAUL
TORREMANS
FOREWORD
-
V
LORD
JUSTICE
COLIN
BIRSS
PREFACE
-
VII
LIST
OF
CONTRIBUTORS
-
XXIII
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS,
PAUL
TORREMANS
INTRODUCTION
-
XXV
PART
1:
THE
EXISTING
SYSTEM:
THE
EPC
JEAN-CHRISTOPHE
GALLOUX
1
THE
ROLE
OF
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
IN
SHAPING
OF
PATENT
LAW
IN
EUROPE
-
3
1.1
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
'
S
CHARACTERS
-
4
1.2
BOA
'
S
ROLE
-----
6
1.2.1
BOA
'
S
WAYS
IN
SHAPING
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
-
6
1.2.2
BOA
'
S
REAL
INFLUENCE
ON
CONTRACTING
STATES
JURISDICTIONS
-
9
1.3
BOA
'
S
LIMITS
IN
SHAPING
OF
PATENT
LAW
IN
EUROPE
-
11
1.3.1
LIMITS
INHERENT
TO
THE
EUROPEAN
LAW
SYSTEM
-
11
1.3.2
DIALOG
OF
JUDGES:
A
NECESSITY
-
14
HEINZ
GODDAR,
KONSTANTIN
WERNER
2
THE
INTERACTION
BETWEEN
THE
UPC,
NATIONAL
COURTS,
AND
THE
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
-
17
2.1
INTRODUCTION
-
17
2.2
INITIAL
SITUATION
-----
17
2.2.1
OBTAINING
PATENT
PROTECTION
IN
EUROPE
-
THE
PRESENT
SYSTEM
-
17
2.2.2
FUTURE
UPS
AND
THE
ROLE
OF
NATIONAL
COURTS
VS.
UPC
-
19
2.3
THE
INTERPLAY
BETWEEN
NATIONAL
COURTS,
UPC,
AND
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
(
'
BOA
'
)
OF
EPO
IN
FUTURE
-----
20
2.4
THE
BEST
FILING
STRATEGY
IN
EUROPE
IN
THE
FUTURE
-
22
2.4.1
"
CATEGORY
A
"
-
22
2.4.2
"
CATEGORY
B
"
-----
24
2.4.3
"
CATEGORY
C
"
-
24
2.5
CONCLUSIONS
-
25
ZANETA
ZEMLA-PACUD,
TOMASZ
TARGOSZ
3
CROSS-BORDER
PATENT
LITIGATION
UNDER
THE
EPC
-
27
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
INTRODUCTION
----
27
EXISTING
RULES
OF
CROSS-BORDER
PATENT
LITIGATION
IN
THE
EU
-
JURISDICTION
-
28
UNFAIR
TACTICAL
LITIGATION
-
36
INFRINGING
ACTS
IN
MULTIPLE
COUNTRIES
-
37
PRACTICAL
RAMIFICATIONS
OF
THE
STATUS
QUO:
INCONSISTENCY
OF
DECISION-MAKING,
HIGH
COSTS,
FORUM
SHOPPING
-
38
3.6
3.7
CONCLUDING
THOUGHTS
-
40
REFERENCES
-
41
ALISON
SLADE
4
PLAUSIBILITY:
A
ROUTE
TO
STRONGER
AND
MORE
ROBUST
PATENTS?
-
43
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
INTRODUCTION
-
43
WHY
A
PLAUSIBILITY
TEST?
-
45
FILLING
THE
LEGISLATIVE
LACUNA
-
46
DEFINING
THE
PLAUSIBILITY
STANDARD
-
48
WHICH
APPROACH
WOULD
SECURE
STRONGER
AND
MORE
ROBUST
PATENTS?
-
52
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
UPC:
A
LACK
OF
LEGAL
COHERENCY
-
55
CONCLUSION
----
57
AMANDINE
LEONARD
5
WRONGFUL
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
AND
EU
PROCEDURAL
LAW
-
59
5.1
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.4
5.4.1
5.4.2
5.5
5.6
5.6.1
5.6.2
5.6.3
INTRODUCTION
-
59
WRONGFUL
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
-
LIABILITY
WITH
OR
WITHOUT
FAULT?
-
60
THE
CASE
----
63
ANALYSIS
-
64
'
APPROPRIATE
COMPENSATION
'
AND
THE
MEANING
OF
'
ABUSE
'
UNDER
IPRED
-
67
A
UNIFORM
INTERPRETATION
OF
'
APPROPRIATE
COMPENSATION
'
-
67
THE
QUESTION
OF
'
ABUSE
'
UNDER
ARTICLE
3(2)
IPRED
-
70
EU
PROCEDURAL
LAW
AND
PATENT
LITIGATION
-
72
IP
ENFORCEMENT
AND
VERTICAL
HARMONISATION
-
72
REFLECTIONS
FOR
PATENT
LITIGATION
AND
CIVIL
PROCEDURAL
LAW
-
74
CONCLUSION
----
76
REFERENCES
----
76
LEGISLATION
-
76
CASE
LAW
-
76
SECONDARY
SOURCES
-
77
MACIEJ
PADAMCZYK,
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS
6
PROPORTIONALITY
AND
PATENT
INJUNCTIONS
-
79
6.1
INTRODUCTION:
PROPORTIONALITY
AND
ENFORCEMENT
OF
PATENT
RIGHTS
-
79
6.2
INJUNCTIONS:
POLICY
CONSIDERATIONS
-
80
6.3
INJUNCTIONS
AND
PROPORTIONALITY:
AN
OUTLINE
OF
THE
DEBATE
-
83
6.4
INJUNCTIONS
AND
PROPORTIONALITY
IN
NATIONAL
AND
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
-
85
6.4.1
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
85
6.4.2
UNITED
STATES
-
87
6.4.3
UNITED
KINGDOM
-
89
6.4.4
GERMANY
-
89
6.4.5
FINAL
INJUNCTIONS
IN
THE
UPC
-
90
6.5
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
-
91
6.6
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
93
PART
2:
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
FRANTZESKA
PAPADOPOULOU
7
THE
NOVELTY
AND
INVENTIVE
STEP
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
AND
UNDER
THEUPP
-
97
7.1
BACKGROUND
-----
97
7.2
NOVELTY
AND
INVENTIVE
STEP
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
A
FRAGMENTISED
VIEW?
-
99
7.2.1
NOVELTY
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
-
99
7.2.2
INVENTIVE
STEP
IN
EUROPE
-
100
7.3
UNITARY
PATENT
BUT
DISHARMONISED
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW?
-
103
7.3.1
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
TOWARDS
A
EUROPEAN
SUBSTANTIVE
PATENT
LAW
-
103
7.3.2
THE
UNITARY
PATENT,
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
COURT
AND
THE
CJEU
-
105
7.4
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
106
ANA
NORDBERG
8
EXCEPTIONS
AND
LIMITATIONS
(27
UPCA)
-
109
8.1
INTRODUCTION:
HISTORICAL
ORIGIN
OF
UPCA
LIMITATIONS
-
109
8.2
LEGAL
NATURE
AND
SCOPE
OF
ARTICLE
27
UPC
-
111
8.2.1
LEGAL
NATURE
OF
LIMITATIONS
-
111
8.2.2
A
CLOSED
LIST
OR
DOES
THE
PROVISION
ALLOW
FOR
FURTHER
LIMITATIONS?
-
112
8.2.3
ANALOGY
AND
EXTENSIVE
INTERPRETATION
-
113
8.3
HARMONIZATION
AND
UNIFORMITY
OF
PATENT
LIMITATIONS
-
114
8.4
ARTICLE
27
LIMITATIONS
TO
THE
EFFECTS
OF
A
PATENT
-
116
8.4.1
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
116
8.4.2
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
EU
POLICY
(COMMUNITY
PATENT
CONVENTION)
-
117
8.4.2.1
ACTS
DONE
PRIVATELY
AND
FOR
NON-COMMERCIAL
PURPOSES
-
117
8.4.2.2
ACTS
DONE
FOR
EXPERIMENTAL
PURPOSES
-
119
8.4.2.3
EXTEMPORANEOUS
PREPARATION
OF
MEDICINES
-
121
8.4.3
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
EU
LAW
-
122
8.4.3.1
USE
IN
THE
CONTEXT
OF
REGULATORY
APPROVAL
PROCEDURES:
'
BOLAR
EXEMPTION
'
-
122
8.4.3.2
PLANT
AND
ANIMAL
RELATED
PATENT
LIMITATIONS
-
125
8.4.3.3
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED
INVENTIONS
DECOMPILATION
AND
INTEROPERABILITY
-
126
8.5
CONCLUSION
-
127
JACQUES
DE
WERRA
9
PATENT
ARBITRATION
UNDER
THE
AGREEMENT
ON
A
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
129
9.1
INTRODUCTION
-----
129
9.2
THE
PATENT
MEDIATION
AND
ARBITRATION
CENTRE
INSTITUTED
BY
THE
UPCA
-
131
9.2.1
INTRODUCTION
-
131
9.2.2
SUBSTANTIVE
SCOPE
OF
THE
ARBITRATION
SERVICES
OFFERED
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
134
9.2.3
NO
EXCLUSIVITY
FOR
ARBITRATION
INSTITUTED
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
137
9.2.4
INTERACTIONS
BETWEEN
ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS
AND
COURT
PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE
THE
COURT
-
138
9.2.5
NO
RIGHT
TO
REVOKE
OR
LIMIT
PATENTS
IN
ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS
-
141
9.2.6
IMPROVED
ENFORCEABILITY
OF
SETTLEMENTS
REACHED
THROUGH
THE
USE
OF
THE
FACILITIES
OF
THE
CENTRE
-
144
9.2.7
DOUBLE
SEAT
OF
THE
CENTRE
AND
PROVISION
OF
'
FACILITIES
'
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
146
9.2.8
LIST
OF
ARBITRATORS
-
148
9.3
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
148
JUSTYNA
OZEGALSKA-TRYBALSKA
10
SUPPLEMENTARY
PROTECTION
CERTIFICATES
(ARTICLE
30)
-
-
153
10.1
INTRODUCTION
-
153
10.2
GENERAL
OVERVIEW
OF
THE
SPC
SYSTEM
IN
THE
EU
-
IN
FITTING
WITH
OR
CONFLICTING
WITH
UNITARY
PROTECTION
CONCEPT?
-
155
10.3
THE
SPC
UNDER
UPCA
-
THE
PRESENT
-
156
10.3.1
THE
SUBJECT
MATTER
APPLICATION
OF
ARTICLE
30
-
157
10.3.2
THE
SCOPE
OF
ARTICLE
30
-
158
10.3.3
EFFECTS
OF
SPC
-
UNITARY
OR
NOT?
-
159
10.4
THE
SPC
UNDER
UPCA
-
THE
FUTURE
-
160
10.4.1
TOWARDS
A
UNITARY
SPC
-
161
10.4.4.1
CENTRALISED
GRANTING
PROCEDURE
-
162
10.4.4.2
MARKETING
AUTHORISATION
FOR
A
UNITARY
SPC
-
164
10.5
FINAL
REMARKS
-
166
PHILLIP
JOHNSON
11
LIABILITY
FOR
INFRINGEMENT
OF
EU
LAW
-
-
169
11.1
INTRODUCTION
-
169
11.2
THE
EXTENT
OF
EU
LAW
BEFORE
THE
UPC
-
170
11.3
COMPELLING
COMPLIANCE
-
174
11.3.1
'
INFRACTION
'
PROCEEDINGS
-
175
11.3.2
KOBLER
LIABILITY
-----
175
11.4
WAYS
IN
WHICH
THE
UPC
CAN
BREACH
EU
LAW
-
177
11.4.1
FAILURE
TO
GIVE
DIRECT
EFFECT
TO
AN
EU
LAW
-
178
11.4.2
INCOMPATIBLE
RULES
-
178
11.4.3
FAILURE
TO
GIVE
CONFORMING
INTERPRETATION
-
180
11.4.4
FAILURE
TO
REQUEST
A
PRELIMINARY
REFERENCE
-
180
11.5
HOW
REAL
IS
THE
RISK?
-
181
11.6
CONCLUSION
-
183
PAUL
LC
TORREMANS
12
REGULATION
542/2014
ON
JURISDICTION
-
185
12.1
INTRODUCTION
-
185
12.2
THE
INSERTION
OF
A
COMMON
COURT:
A
MERE
CLARIFICATION
IN
ARTICLE
71(A)
-
186
12.3
THE
NEW
RULES
ON
INTERNATIONAL
JURISDICTION:
ARTICLE
71B
-
188
12.4
ARTICLE
71C:
LIS
PENDENS
-----
194
12.5
RECOGNITION
AND
ENFORCEMENT
-
196
12.6
CONCLUSION
-
196
PAUL
LC
TORREMANS
13
EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION
AND
COMPETENCE
-
197
13.1
13.2
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.2.3
13.3
13.3.1
13.3.2
13.4
13.5
INTRODUCTION
-
197
THE
EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC:
REGISTRATION
AND
VALIDITY
-
197
APPLYING
ARTICLE
24(4)
BRUSSELS
I
REGULATION
-
197
THE
TRANSITION
PERIOD
AS
A
COMPLICATING
FACTOR
-
198
OTHER
GROUNDS
OF
JURISDICTION
-
199
THE
COMPETENCE
RULES
-
200
AN
ACTION
FOR
THE
REVOCATION
OF
A
PATENT
-
200
INFRINGEMENT
AND
OTHER
ACTIONS
-
201
LIS
PENDENS
-
203
CONCLUSION
-
203
FERNAND
DE
VISSCHER
14
CONSTITUTIONAL
ASPECTS
OF
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
PACKAGE
(UPP)
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPC)
-
QUESTION
MARKS
REMAIN
-
-
YY
205
14.1
REGULATION
1257/2012
-----
206
14.2
THE
UPCA
-----
213
14.3
WHAT
ABOUT
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE?
-
216
ESTHER
VAN
ZIMMEREN
15
TRUSTING
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT:
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
THE
INSTITUTIONAL
DESIGN
OF
THE
UPC
AND
ITS
JUDGES
-
221
15.1
INTRODUCTION
-
221
15.2
THE
ONE-OF-ITS
KIND
UNIQUE
NATURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
224
15.3
TRANSLATING
KEY
CONCEPTS
FROM
THE
TRUST
LITERATURE
TO
THE
UPC
SETTING
-
229
15.3.1
DEFINING
TRUST,
IDENTIFYING
THE
TRUST
RELATIONSHIP
AND
UNDERSTANDING
THE
MULTILEVEL
NATURE
OF
TRUST
WITHIN
THE
CONTEXT
OF
THE
UPC
-
229
15.3.2
TRUST
AND
UNCERTAINTY
-
231
15.3.3
TRUST,
TRUSTWORTHINESS
AND
THE
ABI-MODEL
-
232
15.4
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
233
STEFAN
LUGINBUEHL,
MATILDA
TITECA
16
THE
EPO
WITHIN
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
235
16.1
INTRODUCTION
-
235
16.2
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-----
237
16.2.1
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
REGULATIONS
----
237
16.2.2
AGREEMENT
ON
A
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPCA)
-
238
16.2.3
SECONDARY
LEGISLATION
-
238
16.3
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
FROM
A
GOVERNANCE
PERSPECTIVE
-
239
16.3.1
SELECT
COMMITTEE
OF
THE
ADMINISTRATIVE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
ORGANISATION
-
239
16.3.2
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPC)
-
240
16.4
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
WITH
REGARD
TO
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
PROCEDURE
-
241
16.4.1
ADDITIONAL
TASKS
FOR
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
OFFICE
-
241
16.4.2
REQUEST
FOR
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
242
16.4.3
PAYMENT
OF
FEES
-
242
16.5
CORRELATION
OF
EUROPEAN
PATENT,
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
NATIONAL
PATENT
SYSTEMS
-
243
16.5.1
FROM
A
TRUE
COMMUNITY
PATENT
TO
AN
ALTERNATIVELY
AVAILABLE
PATENT
FOR
A
GROUP
OF
EU
MEMBER
STATES
-
243
16.5.2
CO-EXISTING
EPO
OPPOSITION
AND
APPEALS
PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE
THE
EPO
AND
THE
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL,
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
AND
NATIONAL
COURTS
-
244
16.5.3
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
(CJEU)
AND
IMPACT
ON
THE
EPO
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
246
16.5.3.1
THE
IMPACT
OF
RULINGS
OF
THE
CJEU
ON
THE
EPO
----
246
16.5.3.2
THE
INTERPRETATION
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
PATENT
LAW
PROVIDED
FOR
IN
THE
UPC
AGREEMENT
BY
THE
CJEU
247
16.6
CONCLUSION
----
249
HANNS
ULLRICH
17
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
-
251
17.1
THE
GENERAL
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
-
251
17.1.1
THE
PROVISIONS
OF
THE
TREATIES
-
251
17.1.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
UNDER
REG.
1257/2012
AND
UNDER
OTHER
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
REGULATIONS
COMPARED.
-
252
17.1.2.1
REVIEW
OF
THE
GRANT
AND
OF
THE
VALIDITY
OF
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
-
252
17.1.2.2
INTERPRETATION
OF
THE
RULES
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
OF
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
PROTECTION
-
255
17.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
IN
THE
INTERPRETATION
OF
THE
RULES
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
OF
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
BUNDLE
PATENT
-
257
17.2.1
THE
LAW
COVERED
BY
ART.
267
TFEU
----
257
17.2.1.1
UNION
LAW
----
257
17.2.1.2
THE
INTERDEPENDENCE
OF
REG.
1257/2012
AND
ART.
25
TO
27
UPCA
-
267
17.2.2
THE
RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
276
17.2.2.1
ON
THE
APPLICATION
OF
ART.
267
TFEU
BY
THE
UPC
-
276
17.2.2.2
A
DIVISION
OF
LABOR
-
281
17.3
OUTLOOK
----
285
SAM
GRANATA
18
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC,
A
JUDGE
'
S
PERSPECTIVE
-
-
287
18.1
INTRODUCTION
-
287
18.2
LEVELS
OF
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
288
18.2.1
HIERARCHY
BETWEEN
THE
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
288
18.2.2
THE
UPCA
-----289
18.2.3
THE
STATUTE
-----
290
18.2.4
THE
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
-----292
18.3
THE
DRIVING
PRINCIPLES
OF
'
PROPORTIONALITY
'
AND
'
FAIRNESS
'
AS
A
MATTER
OF
TRUST
IN
THE
UPC
JUDGE
-
293
18.4
PRAGMATIC
VERSUS
LEGALISTIC
APPROACH
-
296
18.5
THE
JUDGE-RAPPORTEUR
-
297
18.6
THE
UPC
AS
ONE-STOP-SHOP
FOR
PATENT
DISPUTES
-
298
18.7
CONCLUSION
------299
GUILLAUME
DUBOS,
STEPHANIE
ROLLIN
DE
CHAMBONAS,
THOMAS
LECONTE
19
THE
USER
IN
THE
UPC
-
301
19.1
OPTING
OUT
AND
IN:
BEWARE
OF
THE
TORPEDOES
-
301
19.2
PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS:
THE
DEVIL
IS
IN
THE
DETAILS
-
303
19.3
THE
UPC
AS
A
'
ONE-STOP
SHOP
'
FOR
USERS
-
305
19.4
NATIONAL
PATENTS:
NOT
(YET?)
OUT
OF
THE
PICTURE
-
306
19.5
FORUM
SHOPPING
WITH
THE
UPC
AND
ITS
IMPACT
ON
ITS
USERS'
ACTIONS
-
307
19.6
MEANS
OF
EVIDENCE:
A
LARGE
AND
COMPLETE
TOOLBOX
FOR
USERS
-
309
19.7
UPC-STYLE
SAISIE:
LESS
POWERFUL
THAN
THE
FRENCH
SAISIE-CONTREFA^ON?
-
311
19.8
ACCESS
TO
DECISIONS,
ORDERS,
AND
WRITTEN
PLEADINGS:
SOME
LINGERING
QUESTION
MARKS
-
313
19.9
CONCLUSION
-
313
KLARA
POLACKOVA
VAN
DER
PLOEG
20
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
AND
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
315
20.1
INTRODUCTION
----
315
20.2
UPC
AS
AN
INTERNATIONAL
COURT
-
317
20.3
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
AS
THE
UPC
'
S
GOVERNING
LAW
-
318
20.4
U
PC
'
S
INTERPRETATIVE
AUTONOMY
-
326
20.5
PATENT
LAW
AND
OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
LAW:
FROM
REGIME-CONFLICT
TO
REGIME-COOPERATION
-
328
20.6
FUNCTIONS
AND
AUTHORITY
OF
INTERNATIONAL
COURTS:
STRENGTHENING
THE
UPC
'
S
DECISION-MAKING
-
331
20.7
OBLIGATIONS
OF
COMMERCIAL
PATENTEES
AND
OTHER
BUSINESSES
-
335
20.8
CONCLUSION:
BUILDING
A
NEW
INTERNATIONAL
COURT
-
338
MILOSZ
MALAGA
21
THE
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
AND
COMPETITION
LAW
-
339
21.1
INTRODUCTION
-
339
21.2
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
IN
THE
INTERNAL
MARKET
-
339
21.3
EU
COMPETITION
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
341
21.4
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
AND
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
-
344
21.4.1
PRINCIPLES
----
344
21.4.2
IPRS
AND
ANTI-COMPETITIVE
AGREEMENTS
-
345
21.4.3
IPRS
AND
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANT
POSITION
-
346
21.4.3.1
REFUSAL
TO
SUPPLY
AND
LICENCE
-
347
21.4.3.2
TYING
----
347
21.4.3.3
EXCESSIVE
PRICING
-
348
21.4.3.4
REGULATORY
AND
LITIGATION
ABUSES
-
348
21.4.3.5
PATENT
HOLD-UPS
AND
PATENT
TROLLING
-
349
21.5
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
-----349
21.6
CONCLUSIONS
-
352
THOMAS
JAEGER,
JOHANNES
LUKAN
22
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
PART
I:
(DIS-)INCENTIVES
FOR
POTENTIAL
PATENTEES
IN
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
-
355
22.1
INTRODUCTION
----
355
22.2
EASY,
FAST
AND
LEGALLY
SECURE
ACCESS
TO
UPS?
-
356
22.2.1
EASY
ACCESS:
THE
EPO
AS
A
CENTRAL
GRANTING
AUTHORITY
AND
THE
LANGUAGE
REGIME
-
356
22.2.1.1
THE
REQUEST
FOR
UNITARY
EFFECT
AS
A
REPLACEMENT
OF
NATIONAL
VALIDATION
-
356
22.2.1.2
DOWNSIDES
TO
THE
LANGUAGE
REGIME?
-
357
22.2.1.3
CENTRALISED
COLLECTION
OF
RENEWAL
FEES
-
358
22.2.2
VALUE
FOR
MONEY:
COSTS
AND
TERRITORIAL
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
-
358
22.2.2.1
WHAT
IS
AN
'
AVERAGE
'
EP?
-
359
22.2.2.2
DEPENDENCE
OF
TERRITORIAL
COVERAGE
ON
THE
STATUS
OF
RATIFICATIONS
-
360
22.2.2.3
WHO
WILL
USE
THE
SYSTEM?
-
361
22.2.2.4
THE
COMPENSATION
SCHEME
-
362
22.2.2.5
LICENSES
OF
RIGHT
----
362
22.2.3
DURATION
OF
THE
GRANTING
PROCEDURE
AND
TEMPORAL
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
-
363
22.2.3.1
THE
EPO
'
S
IMPROVED
TIMELINESS
-
364
22.2.3.2
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
PATENT
QUALITY
-
364
22.2.3.3
THE
UNHEARD
CALL
FOR
A
DIFFERENTIATED
APPROACH
-
366
22.2.3.4
THE
UP
AND
SPCS
----
367
22.2.4
UNCERTAINTIES
REGARDING
THE
LAW
APPLICABLE
TO
THE
UPC
AS
AN
OBJECT
OF
PROPERTY
-
368
22.2.4.1
DISADVANTAGES
OF
THE
AVAILABLE
INTERPRETATIVE
OPTIONS
-
369
22.2.4.2
IMPACT
ON
PATENT
VALUE
-
370
22.2.4.3
WHICH
ALTERNATIVES
WOULD
HAVE
BEEN
AVAILABLE?
-
370
22.3
INTERIM
CONCLUSION
-
371
THOMAS
JAEGER,
JOHANNES
LUKAN
23
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
PART
II:
(DIS-)ADVANTAGES
FOR
FOLLOW-ON
INVENTORS
IN
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
373
23.1
INTRODUCTION
-
373
23.2
SUBSTANTIVE
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
AND
APPLICABLE
LIMITATIONS
-
A
FUNCTIONAL
BALANCE?
-
374
23.2.1
NO
CHANGES
WITH
REGARD
TO
PATENTABILITY?
-
375
23.2.2
A
CASE
FOR
A
PURPOSE-BOUND
COMPOUND
PROTECTION
-
376
23.2.2.1
HOW
COULD
SUCH
ADAPTIONS
BE
MADE?
-
378
23.2.3
THE
APPLICABLE
LIMITATIONS
-
MORE
OF
THE
SAME
-
379
23.2.3.1
LIMITATIONS
STEMMING
FROM
THE
CPCS
----
379
23.2.3.2
LIMITATIONS
STEMMING
FROM
EU
DIRECTIVES
-
380
23.2.3.3
THE
BREEDER
'
S
PRIVILEGE
-
WHY
NOT
ALSO
EXEMPT
NEW
ANIMAL
BREEDS?
-
381
23.2.3.4
THE
BOLAR
AND
THE
GENERAL
RESEARCH
EXCEPTIONS:
A
RACE
TO
THE
BOTTOM?
-
382
23.2.4
COMPULSORY
LICENSES
AND
LIMITATIONS
TO
INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
UNDER
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
388
23.2.4.1
THE
RELATION
BETWEEN
INDIVIDUAL
AND
GENERAL
LIMITATIONS
TO
PATENT
HOLDERS
'
RIGHTS
-----
388
23.2.4.2
THE
LINK
BETWEEN
COMPULSORY
LICENSES
AND
LIMITATIONS
TO
INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
-
388
23.2.4.3
COMPULSORY
LICENCES
LEFT
UNTOUCHED
-
389
23.2.4.4
A
MISSED
OPPORTUNITY
-
390
23.2.4.5
A
PROPORTIONALITY
REQUIREMENT
FOR
INJUNCTIONS
-
391
23.2.4.6
PRESUMED
INCOMPATIBILITY
WITH
EU
LAW
OF
INDIVIDUAL
RESTRAINTS
OF
PATENT
PROTECTION
-
394
23.3
OVERALL
CONCLUSION:
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
-
395
MAXIMILIAN
HAEDICKE
24
PATENT
MEDIATION
-
397
24.1
INTRODUCTION
-
397
24.1.1
DEFINITION
AND
LEGAL
BASIS
-
397
24.1.2
GUIDING
PRINCIPLES
-
398
24.1.2.1
CONFIDENTIALITY
-
399
24.1.2.2
VOLUNTARINESS
----
399
24.1.2.3
OPENNESS
----
399
24.1.2.4
ALL-PARTIALITY
/
NEUTRALITY
-----399
24.1.2.5
LEGAL
INFORMATION
----
399
24.1.3
THE
COURSE
OF
IP
MEDIATION
PROCEEDINGS
-
400
24.1.3.1
FIRST
CONTACT
----
400
24.1.3.2
PREPARATION
-
400
24.1.3.3
OPENING
-
PHASE
I
----
401
24.1.3.4
EXPLORATION
OF
FACTS
AND
IDENTIFICATION
OF
ISSUES
-
PHASE
II
-
402
24.1.3.5
WORKING
THROUGH
THE
AREAS
OF
CONFLICT
-
PHASE
III
-
402
24.1.3.6
NEGOTIATION
AND
PROBLEM
SOLVING
-
PHASE
IV
-
403
24.1.3.7
DRAFTING
A
FINAL
AGREEMENT
-
PHASE
V
-
404
24.1.3.8
ENFORCEMENT
OF
MEDIATION
SETTLEMENTS
-
404
24.1.4
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
MEDIATOR
----
405
24.1.4.1
GENERAL
----
405
24.1.4.2
THE
MEDIATOR
'
S
TECHNIQUES
FOR
CONFLICT
RESOLUTION
-
405
24.1.4.3
SPECIAL
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
MEDIATORS
IN
PATENT
DISPUTES
-
406
24.1.5
OPPORTUNITIES
AND
CHALLENGES
OF
MEDIATION
IN
GENERAL
-
406
24.2
PATENT
CONFLICTS
SUITABLE
FOR
MEDIATION
-
407
24.2.1
LICENCE
AGREEMENTS
-
407
24.2.2
INTERNATIONAL
AND
COMPLEX
DISPUTES
-
408
24.2.3
DISPUTES
REQUIRING
CONFIDENTIALITY
-
408
24.2.4
FURTHER
ADVANTAGES
OF
MEDIATION
-
409
24.3
CONCLUSION
-----
410
ALAN
JOHNSON
25
LITIGATION
STRATEGIES
AND
BIFURCATION
-
411
25.1
INTRODUCTION
-----
411
25.2
FORUM
SHOPPING
WITHIN
THE
UPC
-----
413
25.2.1
THE
CLAIMANT
PERSPECTIVE
----
414
25.2.2
THE
NON-PATENTEE
DEFENDANT
PERSPECTIVE
-
417
25.2.3
THE
PATENTEE
DEFENDANT
PERSPECTIVE
-
417
25.2.4
CONCLUSIONS
ON
THE
'
BALANCE
OF
POWER
-
418
25.3
FORUM
SHOPPING
BETWEEN
NATIONAL
AND
UPC
JURISDICTIONS
IN
THE
TRANSITIONAL
PERIOD
-----
418
25.4
ANTI-SUIT
INJUNCTIONS
----
420
25.5
CONCLUSIONS
-
A
MORE
UNCERTAIN
WORLD
FOR
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LITIGATION
-
422
MATTHIAS
LAMPING,
CHRISTOPH
RADEMACHER
26
PATENT
LITIGATION
STRATEGIES
IN
GERMANY:
MANEUVERING
THE
EVOLVING
LANDSCAPE
OF
BIFURCATION
-
423
26.1
BIFURCATION
OF
PROCEEDINGS
-
423
26.1.1
GERMA
NY
-
423
26.1.1.1
BASIC
STRUCTURE,
LEGAL
BASIS
AND
EFFECT
-
423
26.1.1.2
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
A
STAY
OF
THE
INFRINGEMENT
PROCEDURE
-
425
26.1.1.3
COMMUNICATION
BETWEEN
PATENT
COURT
AND
INFRINGEMENT
COURTS
-
427
26.1.2
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
431
26.1.2.1
INSTITUTIONAL
STRUCTURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
431
26.1.2.2
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
----
432
26.1.3
JAPAN
----
436
26.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
LITIGATION
-
439
26.2.1
GENERAL
REMARKS
-----
439
26.2.2
LITIGATING
IN
GERMANY
-
440
26.2.2.1
TIMING
OF
REVOCATION
AND
INFRINGEMENT
ACTIONS
-
440
26.2.2.2
STAY
OF
INFRINGEMENT
PROCEEDINGS
-
441
26.2.2.3
COMPENSATION
FOR
INJURY
CAUSED
BY
ENFORCEMENT
-
442
26.2.3
LITIGATING
BEFORE
THE
UPC
----
442
26.2.3.1
INFRINGEMENT
ACTIONS
BROUGHT
BY
LICENSEES
-
443
26.2.3.2
PARALLEL
REVOCATION
AND
COUNTERCLAIM
-
444
26.2.3.3
COMPENSATION
FOR
INJURY
CAUSED
BY
ENFORCEMENT
-
444
26.3
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
445
PART
3:
CO-EXISTENCE
AND
ALTERNATIVES
MARC
MIMLER
27
THE
CO-EXISTENCE
BETWEEN
EPC
AND
PATENTS
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
449
27.1
INTRODUCTION
------
449
27.2
MAIN
BODY
------
450
27.2.1
HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND
-----
450
27.2.2
OCCURRENCE
-------452
27.2.2.1
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
(I.E.
UPS)
-
453
27.2.2.2
CLASSICAL
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
FALLING
WITHIN
THE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
-
454
27.2.2.3
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
WHICH
DO
NOT
FALL
WITHIN
THE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
-
-
454
27.2.2.4
NATIONAL
PATENTS
-
-
458
27.2.3
ADJUDICATION
AND
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
-
459
27.2.3.1
THE
UPC
'
S
EXCLUSIVE
COMPETENCE
-
459
27.2.3.2
COMPETENCE
OF
NATIONAL
COURTS
AND
APPLICABLE
LAW
-
460
27.3
CONCLUSION
----
461
KAREN
WALSH
28
INSTITUTIONAL
COEXISTENCE:
THE
NECESSITY
OF
JUDICIAL
DIALOGUE
AND
COOPERATION
IN
THE
UPC
-
463
28.1
INTRODUCTION
-
463
28.2
THE
UPC
-----
464
28.3
HARMONISATION
AND
THE
UPC
-
468
28.4
THE
NECESSITY
OF
JUDICIAL
DIALOGUE
AND
COOPERATION
IN
THE
UPC
-
471
28.5
CONCLUSION
-
474
TAMAR
KHUCHUA
29
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
IN
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
FROM
A
PROCEDURAL
PERSPECTIVE
-
477
INTRODUCTIONS
-
477
29.1
EU
LEGISLATION
IN
PATENT
LAW
AND
THE
CJEU
'
S
CURRENT
ROLE
IN
THE
PATENT
FIELD
-
478
29.2
AVENUES
LEADING
TO
CJEU
JUDGMENTS
ON
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
AND
AVAILABLE
CASE
LAW
-
480
29.3
GUARANTEEING
AN
EU-LAW
COMPLIANT
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
PROCEDURE
WITHIN
NATIONAL
COURTS
BASED
ON
THE
ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTIVE
-
483
29.3.1
CJEU
RULINGS
ON
INTERIM
AND
PROVISIONAL
MEASURES
IN
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
-
485
29.3.2
THE
ISSUE
OF
REIMBURSEMENT
OF
LEGAL
COSTS
IN
PATENT
PROCEEDINGS
CLARIFIED
BY
THE
CJEU
489
29.3.3
CJEU
PROVIDING
GUIDANCE
ON
PROCEDURAL
GUARANTEES
IN
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
IN
THE
LIGHT
OF
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
-
491
29.4
THE
FUTURE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
IN
PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS
OF
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
AT
THE
UPC
-
493
29.5
CONCLUSION
-
495
NAOMI
HAWKINS
30
GENE
PATENTS
IN
THE
EPC
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
497
30.1
INTRODUCTION
-
497
30.1.1
DEFINITION
OF
GENE
PATENTS
-
498
30.1.2
CURRENT
TECHNICAL
LANDSCAPE
-
499
30.2
PATENTS
ON
GENES
-
THE
HISTORICAL
CONCERNS
-
502
30.3
GENE
PATENTS
IN
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
-
CURRENT
PRESSING
QUESTIONS
-
504
30.3.1
ETHICS
AND
MORALITY
-
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
MORALITY
EXCLUSION
-
504
30.3.2
ADDRESSING
ACCESS
CONCERNS
-
508
30.3.3
DIVERGENCE
OF
APPROACHES
-
DOES
THE
UPC
OFFER
POSSIBILITIES
FOR
INCREASED
HARMONISATION?
-
511
30.3.3.1
A
SINGLE
FORUM
-
513
30.3.3.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
----
513
30.3.3.3
PERSUASIVE
STANDARDS
-
514
30.4
CONCLUSION
-
515
AISLING
MCMAHON
31
DECISION-MAKERS,
INSTITUTIONAL
INFLUENCES
AND
THE
ROLE
OF
ETHICAL
ISSUES
IN
THE
PATENTING
OF
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
INVENTIONS
IN
EUROPE:
ENTER
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
517
INTRODUCTION
-
517
31.1
PATENTING
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
INVENTIONS
IN
EUROPE:
THE
EMBEDDING
OF
ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
WITHIN
THE
BIOTECHNOLOGY
DIRECTIVE
98/44/EC
-
519
31.1.1
DRAFTING
OF
THE
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
DIRECTIVE
AND
ETHIC
-
520
31.1.2
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
AND
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
521
31.2
APPLYING
THE
DIRECTIVE
'
S
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
IN
EUROPE:
INTERPRETATIVE
COMMUNITIES,
INSTITUTIONAL
OVERLAPS
&
INFLUENCES
-
522
31.2.1
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
WITHIN
THE
DIRECTIVE
&
PRACTICAL
INTERPRETATION
-
PRE-UPC
-
522
31.2.2
INSTITUTIONAL
OVERLAPS
&
ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
-
ENTER
THE
UPC
-
523
31.2.3
INTERPRETATIVE
COMMUNITIES
AND
THE
UPC
'
S
ROLE
IN
INTERPRETING
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
WITHIN
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
525
31.2.3.1
ETHICAL
ISSUES,
DISCRETION
&
THE
INTERPRETATIVE
ROLE
OF
DECISION-MAKERS
IN
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
526
31.2.3.2
INSTITUTIONAL
INFLUENCES
AND
OVERLAPPING
EPO,
CJEU
AND
UPC
FUNCTIONS:
INTERPRETATING
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
IN
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
527
31.3
TECHNOLOGICAL
DEVELOPMENTS
AND
THE
NEED
FOR
A
RENEWED
CONVERSATION
ON
THE
ROLE
ETHICAL
ISSUES
SHOULD
PLAY
WITHIN
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
529
31.4
CONCLUDING
THOUGHTS
-
530
GAIL
E
EVANS
32
THE
UPC
AND
THE
FRAND
INJUNCTION
-
533
32.1
THE
DISCRETION
OF
THE
UPC
TO
GRANT
A
FINAL
INJUNCTION
-
-
536
32.1.1
THE
ENGLISH
COURTS
AND
THE
DISCRETIONARY
GRANT
OF
AN
INJUNCTION
-
537
32.2
THE
FRAND
UNDERTAKING
AND
THE
COURT
'
S
DISCRETION
TO
GRANT
A
FINAL
INJUNCTION
-
539
32.2.1
USE
OF
THE
FRAND
INJUNCTION
TO
DEFEAT
HOLD-OUT
STRATEGIES
-
541
32.3
THE
DISCRETION
TO
AWARD
DAMAGES
AS
AN
ALTERNATE
AND
ADEQUATE
REMEDY
-
543
32.4
WITHHOLDING
AN
INJUNCTION
BASED
ON
THE
FRAND
DEFENCE
OF
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
-
545
32.4.1
HUAWEI
V
ZTE:
A
'
SAFE
HARBOUR
'
FROM
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
-
547
32.4.2
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
GIVING
THE
IMPLEMENTER
NOTICE
OF
PATENT
INFRINGEMENT
-
548
32.4.3
ASSESSING
'
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
'
-
549
32.4.3.1
OFFERING
A
GLOBAL
LICENCE
----
550
32.4.3.2
BUNDLING
SEPS
AND
NON-SEPS
-
550
32.4.3.3
THE
REASONABLENESS
OF
THE
ROYALTY
RATE
-
-
551
32.5
NO
ENTITLEMENT
TO
AN
INJUNCTION
WHERE
THE
DEFENDANT
IS
A
WILLING
LICENSEE
-
552
32.5.1
PROOF
OF
AN
IMPLEMENTER'S
'
WILLINGNESS
'
TO
ENTER
INTO
A
FRAND
LICENCE
----
553
32.6
CONCLUSION:
FRAND
INJUNCTIONS,
CONSISTENCY
OF
DECISION-MAKING
AND
ARBITRATION
-----
555
INDEX
-
557 |
| adam_txt |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS,
PAUL
TORREMANS
FOREWORD
-
V
LORD
JUSTICE
COLIN
BIRSS
PREFACE
-
VII
LIST
OF
CONTRIBUTORS
-
XXIII
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS,
PAUL
TORREMANS
INTRODUCTION
-
XXV
PART
1:
THE
EXISTING
SYSTEM:
THE
EPC
JEAN-CHRISTOPHE
GALLOUX
1
THE
ROLE
OF
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
IN
SHAPING
OF
PATENT
LAW
IN
EUROPE
-
3
1.1
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
'
S
CHARACTERS
-
4
1.2
BOA
'
S
ROLE
-----
6
1.2.1
BOA
'
S
WAYS
IN
SHAPING
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
-
6
1.2.2
BOA
'
S
REAL
INFLUENCE
ON
CONTRACTING
STATES
JURISDICTIONS
-
9
1.3
BOA
'
S
LIMITS
IN
SHAPING
OF
PATENT
LAW
IN
EUROPE
-
11
1.3.1
LIMITS
INHERENT
TO
THE
EUROPEAN
LAW
SYSTEM
-
11
1.3.2
DIALOG
OF
JUDGES:
A
NECESSITY
-
14
HEINZ
GODDAR,
KONSTANTIN
WERNER
2
THE
INTERACTION
BETWEEN
THE
UPC,
NATIONAL
COURTS,
AND
THE
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
-
17
2.1
INTRODUCTION
-
17
2.2
INITIAL
SITUATION
-----
17
2.2.1
OBTAINING
PATENT
PROTECTION
IN
EUROPE
-
THE
PRESENT
SYSTEM
-
17
2.2.2
FUTURE
UPS
AND
THE
ROLE
OF
NATIONAL
COURTS
VS.
UPC
-
19
2.3
THE
INTERPLAY
BETWEEN
NATIONAL
COURTS,
UPC,
AND
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL
(
'
BOA
'
)
OF
EPO
IN
FUTURE
-----
20
2.4
THE
BEST
FILING
STRATEGY
IN
EUROPE
IN
THE
FUTURE
-
22
2.4.1
"
CATEGORY
A
"
-
22
2.4.2
"
CATEGORY
B
"
-----
24
2.4.3
"
CATEGORY
C
"
-
24
2.5
CONCLUSIONS
-
25
ZANETA
ZEMLA-PACUD,
TOMASZ
TARGOSZ
3
CROSS-BORDER
PATENT
LITIGATION
UNDER
THE
EPC
-
27
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
INTRODUCTION
----
27
EXISTING
RULES
OF
CROSS-BORDER
PATENT
LITIGATION
IN
THE
EU
-
JURISDICTION
-
28
UNFAIR
TACTICAL
LITIGATION
-
36
INFRINGING
ACTS
IN
MULTIPLE
COUNTRIES
-
37
PRACTICAL
RAMIFICATIONS
OF
THE
STATUS
QUO:
INCONSISTENCY
OF
DECISION-MAKING,
HIGH
COSTS,
FORUM
SHOPPING
-
38
3.6
3.7
CONCLUDING
THOUGHTS
-
40
REFERENCES
-
41
ALISON
SLADE
4
PLAUSIBILITY:
A
ROUTE
TO
STRONGER
AND
MORE
ROBUST
PATENTS?
-
43
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
INTRODUCTION
-
43
WHY
A
PLAUSIBILITY
TEST?
-
45
FILLING
THE
LEGISLATIVE
LACUNA
-
46
DEFINING
THE
PLAUSIBILITY
STANDARD
-
48
WHICH
APPROACH
WOULD
SECURE
STRONGER
AND
MORE
ROBUST
PATENTS?
-
52
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
THE
UPC:
A
LACK
OF
LEGAL
COHERENCY
-
55
CONCLUSION
----
57
AMANDINE
LEONARD
5
WRONGFUL
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
AND
EU
PROCEDURAL
LAW
-
59
5.1
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.4
5.4.1
5.4.2
5.5
5.6
5.6.1
5.6.2
5.6.3
INTRODUCTION
-
59
WRONGFUL
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
-
LIABILITY
WITH
OR
WITHOUT
FAULT?
-
60
THE
CASE
----
63
ANALYSIS
-
64
'
APPROPRIATE
COMPENSATION
'
AND
THE
MEANING
OF
'
ABUSE
'
UNDER
IPRED
-
67
A
UNIFORM
INTERPRETATION
OF
'
APPROPRIATE
COMPENSATION
'
-
67
THE
QUESTION
OF
'
ABUSE
'
UNDER
ARTICLE
3(2)
IPRED
-
70
EU
PROCEDURAL
LAW
AND
PATENT
LITIGATION
-
72
IP
ENFORCEMENT
AND
VERTICAL
HARMONISATION
-
72
REFLECTIONS
FOR
PATENT
LITIGATION
AND
CIVIL
PROCEDURAL
LAW
-
74
CONCLUSION
----
76
REFERENCES
----
76
LEGISLATION
-
76
CASE
LAW
-
76
SECONDARY
SOURCES
-
77
MACIEJ
PADAMCZYK,
DUNCAN
MATTHEWS
6
PROPORTIONALITY
AND
PATENT
INJUNCTIONS
-
79
6.1
INTRODUCTION:
PROPORTIONALITY
AND
ENFORCEMENT
OF
PATENT
RIGHTS
-
79
6.2
INJUNCTIONS:
POLICY
CONSIDERATIONS
-
80
6.3
INJUNCTIONS
AND
PROPORTIONALITY:
AN
OUTLINE
OF
THE
DEBATE
-
83
6.4
INJUNCTIONS
AND
PROPORTIONALITY
IN
NATIONAL
AND
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
-
85
6.4.1
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
85
6.4.2
UNITED
STATES
-
87
6.4.3
UNITED
KINGDOM
-
89
6.4.4
GERMANY
-
89
6.4.5
FINAL
INJUNCTIONS
IN
THE
UPC
-
90
6.5
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIONS
-
91
6.6
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
93
PART
2:
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
FRANTZESKA
PAPADOPOULOU
7
THE
NOVELTY
AND
INVENTIVE
STEP
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
AND
UNDER
THEUPP
-
97
7.1
BACKGROUND
-----
97
7.2
NOVELTY
AND
INVENTIVE
STEP
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
A
FRAGMENTISED
VIEW?
-
99
7.2.1
NOVELTY
REQUIREMENT
IN
EUROPE
-
99
7.2.2
INVENTIVE
STEP
IN
EUROPE
-
100
7.3
UNITARY
PATENT
BUT
DISHARMONISED
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW?
-
103
7.3.1
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
TOWARDS
A
EUROPEAN
SUBSTANTIVE
PATENT
LAW
-
103
7.3.2
THE
UNITARY
PATENT,
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
COURT
AND
THE
CJEU
-
105
7.4
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
106
ANA
NORDBERG
8
EXCEPTIONS
AND
LIMITATIONS
(27
UPCA)
-
109
8.1
INTRODUCTION:
HISTORICAL
ORIGIN
OF
UPCA
LIMITATIONS
-
109
8.2
LEGAL
NATURE
AND
SCOPE
OF
ARTICLE
27
UPC
-
111
8.2.1
LEGAL
NATURE
OF
LIMITATIONS
-
111
8.2.2
A
CLOSED
LIST
OR
DOES
THE
PROVISION
ALLOW
FOR
FURTHER
LIMITATIONS?
-
112
8.2.3
ANALOGY
AND
EXTENSIVE
INTERPRETATION
-
113
8.3
HARMONIZATION
AND
UNIFORMITY
OF
PATENT
LIMITATIONS
-
114
8.4
ARTICLE
27
LIMITATIONS
TO
THE
EFFECTS
OF
A
PATENT
-
116
8.4.1
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
116
8.4.2
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
EU
POLICY
(COMMUNITY
PATENT
CONVENTION)
-
117
8.4.2.1
ACTS
DONE
PRIVATELY
AND
FOR
NON-COMMERCIAL
PURPOSES
-
117
8.4.2.2
ACTS
DONE
FOR
EXPERIMENTAL
PURPOSES
-
119
8.4.2.3
EXTEMPORANEOUS
PREPARATION
OF
MEDICINES
-
121
8.4.3
LIMITATIONS
BASED
ON
EU
LAW
-
122
8.4.3.1
USE
IN
THE
CONTEXT
OF
REGULATORY
APPROVAL
PROCEDURES:
'
BOLAR
EXEMPTION
'
-
122
8.4.3.2
PLANT
AND
ANIMAL
RELATED
PATENT
LIMITATIONS
-
125
8.4.3.3
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED
INVENTIONS
DECOMPILATION
AND
INTEROPERABILITY
-
126
8.5
CONCLUSION
-
127
JACQUES
DE
WERRA
9
PATENT
ARBITRATION
UNDER
THE
AGREEMENT
ON
A
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
129
9.1
INTRODUCTION
-----
129
9.2
THE
PATENT
MEDIATION
AND
ARBITRATION
CENTRE
INSTITUTED
BY
THE
UPCA
-
131
9.2.1
INTRODUCTION
-
131
9.2.2
SUBSTANTIVE
SCOPE
OF
THE
ARBITRATION
SERVICES
OFFERED
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
134
9.2.3
NO
EXCLUSIVITY
FOR
ARBITRATION
INSTITUTED
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
137
9.2.4
INTERACTIONS
BETWEEN
ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS
AND
COURT
PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE
THE
COURT
-
138
9.2.5
NO
RIGHT
TO
REVOKE
OR
LIMIT
PATENTS
IN
ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS
-
141
9.2.6
IMPROVED
ENFORCEABILITY
OF
SETTLEMENTS
REACHED
THROUGH
THE
USE
OF
THE
FACILITIES
OF
THE
CENTRE
-
144
9.2.7
DOUBLE
SEAT
OF
THE
CENTRE
AND
PROVISION
OF
'
FACILITIES
'
BY
THE
CENTRE
-
146
9.2.8
LIST
OF
ARBITRATORS
-
148
9.3
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
148
JUSTYNA
OZEGALSKA-TRYBALSKA
10
SUPPLEMENTARY
PROTECTION
CERTIFICATES
(ARTICLE
30)
-
-
153
10.1
INTRODUCTION
-
153
10.2
GENERAL
OVERVIEW
OF
THE
SPC
SYSTEM
IN
THE
EU
-
IN
FITTING
WITH
OR
CONFLICTING
WITH
UNITARY
PROTECTION
CONCEPT?
-
155
10.3
THE
SPC
UNDER
UPCA
-
THE
PRESENT
-
156
10.3.1
THE
SUBJECT
MATTER
APPLICATION
OF
ARTICLE
30
-
157
10.3.2
THE
SCOPE
OF
ARTICLE
30
-
158
10.3.3
EFFECTS
OF
SPC
-
UNITARY
OR
NOT?
-
159
10.4
THE
SPC
UNDER
UPCA
-
THE
FUTURE
-
160
10.4.1
TOWARDS
A
UNITARY
SPC
-
161
10.4.4.1
CENTRALISED
GRANTING
PROCEDURE
-
162
10.4.4.2
MARKETING
AUTHORISATION
FOR
A
UNITARY
SPC
-
164
10.5
FINAL
REMARKS
-
166
PHILLIP
JOHNSON
11
LIABILITY
FOR
INFRINGEMENT
OF
EU
LAW
-
-
169
11.1
INTRODUCTION
-
169
11.2
THE
EXTENT
OF
EU
LAW
BEFORE
THE
UPC
-
170
11.3
COMPELLING
COMPLIANCE
-
174
11.3.1
'
INFRACTION
'
PROCEEDINGS
-
175
11.3.2
KOBLER
LIABILITY
-----
175
11.4
WAYS
IN
WHICH
THE
UPC
CAN
BREACH
EU
LAW
-
177
11.4.1
FAILURE
TO
GIVE
DIRECT
EFFECT
TO
AN
EU
LAW
-
178
11.4.2
INCOMPATIBLE
RULES
-
178
11.4.3
FAILURE
TO
GIVE
CONFORMING
INTERPRETATION
-
180
11.4.4
FAILURE
TO
REQUEST
A
PRELIMINARY
REFERENCE
-
180
11.5
HOW
REAL
IS
THE
RISK?
-
181
11.6
CONCLUSION
-
183
PAUL
LC
TORREMANS
12
REGULATION
542/2014
ON
JURISDICTION
-
185
12.1
INTRODUCTION
-
185
12.2
THE
INSERTION
OF
A
COMMON
COURT:
A
MERE
CLARIFICATION
IN
ARTICLE
71(A)
-
186
12.3
THE
NEW
RULES
ON
INTERNATIONAL
JURISDICTION:
ARTICLE
71B
-
188
12.4
ARTICLE
71C:
LIS
PENDENS
-----
194
12.5
RECOGNITION
AND
ENFORCEMENT
-
196
12.6
CONCLUSION
-
196
PAUL
LC
TORREMANS
13
EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION
AND
COMPETENCE
-
197
13.1
13.2
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.2.3
13.3
13.3.1
13.3.2
13.4
13.5
INTRODUCTION
-
197
THE
EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC:
REGISTRATION
AND
VALIDITY
-
197
APPLYING
ARTICLE
24(4)
BRUSSELS
I
REGULATION
-
197
THE
TRANSITION
PERIOD
AS
A
COMPLICATING
FACTOR
-
198
OTHER
GROUNDS
OF
JURISDICTION
-
199
THE
COMPETENCE
RULES
-
200
AN
ACTION
FOR
THE
REVOCATION
OF
A
PATENT
-
200
INFRINGEMENT
AND
OTHER
ACTIONS
-
201
LIS
PENDENS
-
203
CONCLUSION
-
203
FERNAND
DE
VISSCHER
14
CONSTITUTIONAL
ASPECTS
OF
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
PACKAGE
(UPP)
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPC)
-
QUESTION
MARKS
REMAIN
-
-
YY
205
14.1
REGULATION
1257/2012
-----
206
14.2
THE
UPCA
-----
213
14.3
WHAT
ABOUT
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE?
-
216
ESTHER
VAN
ZIMMEREN
15
TRUSTING
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT:
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
THE
INSTITUTIONAL
DESIGN
OF
THE
UPC
AND
ITS
JUDGES
-
221
15.1
INTRODUCTION
-
221
15.2
THE
ONE-OF-ITS
KIND
UNIQUE
NATURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
224
15.3
TRANSLATING
KEY
CONCEPTS
FROM
THE
TRUST
LITERATURE
TO
THE
UPC
SETTING
-
229
15.3.1
DEFINING
TRUST,
IDENTIFYING
THE
TRUST
RELATIONSHIP
AND
UNDERSTANDING
THE
MULTILEVEL
NATURE
OF
TRUST
WITHIN
THE
CONTEXT
OF
THE
UPC
-
229
15.3.2
TRUST
AND
UNCERTAINTY
-
231
15.3.3
TRUST,
TRUSTWORTHINESS
AND
THE
ABI-MODEL
-
232
15.4
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
233
STEFAN
LUGINBUEHL,
MATILDA
TITECA
16
THE
EPO
WITHIN
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
235
16.1
INTRODUCTION
-
235
16.2
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-----
237
16.2.1
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
REGULATIONS
----
237
16.2.2
AGREEMENT
ON
A
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPCA)
-
238
16.2.3
SECONDARY
LEGISLATION
-
238
16.3
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
FROM
A
GOVERNANCE
PERSPECTIVE
-
239
16.3.1
SELECT
COMMITTEE
OF
THE
ADMINISTRATIVE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
ORGANISATION
-
239
16.3.2
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
(UPC)
-
240
16.4
ROLE
OF
THE
EPO
WITH
REGARD
TO
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
PROCEDURE
-
241
16.4.1
ADDITIONAL
TASKS
FOR
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
OFFICE
-
241
16.4.2
REQUEST
FOR
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
242
16.4.3
PAYMENT
OF
FEES
-
242
16.5
CORRELATION
OF
EUROPEAN
PATENT,
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
NATIONAL
PATENT
SYSTEMS
-
243
16.5.1
FROM
A
TRUE
COMMUNITY
PATENT
TO
AN
ALTERNATIVELY
AVAILABLE
PATENT
FOR
A
GROUP
OF
EU
MEMBER
STATES
-
243
16.5.2
CO-EXISTING
EPO
OPPOSITION
AND
APPEALS
PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE
THE
EPO
AND
THE
EPO
BOARDS
OF
APPEAL,
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
AND
NATIONAL
COURTS
-
244
16.5.3
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
(CJEU)
AND
IMPACT
ON
THE
EPO
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
246
16.5.3.1
THE
IMPACT
OF
RULINGS
OF
THE
CJEU
ON
THE
EPO
----
246
16.5.3.2
THE
INTERPRETATION
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
PATENT
LAW
PROVIDED
FOR
IN
THE
UPC
AGREEMENT
BY
THE
CJEU
247
16.6
CONCLUSION
----
249
HANNS
ULLRICH
17
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
OF
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
-
251
17.1
THE
GENERAL
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
-
251
17.1.1
THE
PROVISIONS
OF
THE
TREATIES
-
251
17.1.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
UNDER
REG.
1257/2012
AND
UNDER
OTHER
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
REGULATIONS
COMPARED.
-
252
17.1.2.1
REVIEW
OF
THE
GRANT
AND
OF
THE
VALIDITY
OF
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
-
252
17.1.2.2
INTERPRETATION
OF
THE
RULES
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
OF
EU
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
PROTECTION
-
255
17.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
IN
THE
INTERPRETATION
OF
THE
RULES
OF
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
OF
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
BUNDLE
PATENT
-
257
17.2.1
THE
LAW
COVERED
BY
ART.
267
TFEU
----
257
17.2.1.1
UNION
LAW
----
257
17.2.1.2
THE
INTERDEPENDENCE
OF
REG.
1257/2012
AND
ART.
25
TO
27
UPCA
-
267
17.2.2
THE
RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN
THE
COURT
OF
JUSTICE
AND
THE
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
276
17.2.2.1
ON
THE
APPLICATION
OF
ART.
267
TFEU
BY
THE
UPC
-
276
17.2.2.2
A
DIVISION
OF
LABOR
-
281
17.3
OUTLOOK
----
285
SAM
GRANATA
18
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC,
A
JUDGE
'
S
PERSPECTIVE
-
-
287
18.1
INTRODUCTION
-
287
18.2
LEVELS
OF
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
288
18.2.1
HIERARCHY
BETWEEN
THE
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
288
18.2.2
THE
UPCA
-----289
18.2.3
THE
STATUTE
-----
290
18.2.4
THE
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
-----292
18.3
THE
DRIVING
PRINCIPLES
OF
'
PROPORTIONALITY
'
AND
'
FAIRNESS
'
AS
A
MATTER
OF
TRUST
IN
THE
UPC
JUDGE
-
293
18.4
PRAGMATIC
VERSUS
LEGALISTIC
APPROACH
-
296
18.5
THE
JUDGE-RAPPORTEUR
-
297
18.6
THE
UPC
AS
ONE-STOP-SHOP
FOR
PATENT
DISPUTES
-
298
18.7
CONCLUSION
------299
GUILLAUME
DUBOS,
STEPHANIE
ROLLIN
DE
CHAMBONAS,
THOMAS
LECONTE
19
THE
USER
IN
THE
UPC
-
301
19.1
OPTING
OUT
AND
IN:
BEWARE
OF
THE
TORPEDOES
-
301
19.2
PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS:
THE
DEVIL
IS
IN
THE
DETAILS
-
303
19.3
THE
UPC
AS
A
'
ONE-STOP
SHOP
'
FOR
USERS
-
305
19.4
NATIONAL
PATENTS:
NOT
(YET?)
OUT
OF
THE
PICTURE
-
306
19.5
FORUM
SHOPPING
WITH
THE
UPC
AND
ITS
IMPACT
ON
ITS
USERS'
ACTIONS
-
307
19.6
MEANS
OF
EVIDENCE:
A
LARGE
AND
COMPLETE
TOOLBOX
FOR
USERS
-
309
19.7
UPC-STYLE
SAISIE:
LESS
POWERFUL
THAN
THE
FRENCH
SAISIE-CONTREFA^ON?
-
311
19.8
ACCESS
TO
DECISIONS,
ORDERS,
AND
WRITTEN
PLEADINGS:
SOME
LINGERING
QUESTION
MARKS
-
313
19.9
CONCLUSION
-
313
KLARA
POLACKOVA
VAN
DER
PLOEG
20
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
AND
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
-
315
20.1
INTRODUCTION
----
315
20.2
UPC
AS
AN
INTERNATIONAL
COURT
-
317
20.3
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
AS
THE
UPC
'
S
GOVERNING
LAW
-
318
20.4
U
PC
'
S
INTERPRETATIVE
AUTONOMY
-
326
20.5
PATENT
LAW
AND
OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
LAW:
FROM
REGIME-CONFLICT
TO
REGIME-COOPERATION
-
328
20.6
FUNCTIONS
AND
AUTHORITY
OF
INTERNATIONAL
COURTS:
STRENGTHENING
THE
UPC
'
S
DECISION-MAKING
-
331
20.7
OBLIGATIONS
OF
COMMERCIAL
PATENTEES
AND
OTHER
BUSINESSES
-
335
20.8
CONCLUSION:
BUILDING
A
NEW
INTERNATIONAL
COURT
-
338
MILOSZ
MALAGA
21
THE
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
AND
COMPETITION
LAW
-
339
21.1
INTRODUCTION
-
339
21.2
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
IN
THE
INTERNAL
MARKET
-
339
21.3
EU
COMPETITION
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
341
21.4
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
AND
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
RIGHTS
-
344
21.4.1
PRINCIPLES
----
344
21.4.2
IPRS
AND
ANTI-COMPETITIVE
AGREEMENTS
-
345
21.4.3
IPRS
AND
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANT
POSITION
-
346
21.4.3.1
REFUSAL
TO
SUPPLY
AND
LICENCE
-
347
21.4.3.2
TYING
----
347
21.4.3.3
EXCESSIVE
PRICING
-
348
21.4.3.4
REGULATORY
AND
LITIGATION
ABUSES
-
348
21.4.3.5
PATENT
HOLD-UPS
AND
PATENT
TROLLING
-
349
21.5
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
AND
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
-----349
21.6
CONCLUSIONS
-
352
THOMAS
JAEGER,
JOHANNES
LUKAN
22
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
PART
I:
(DIS-)INCENTIVES
FOR
POTENTIAL
PATENTEES
IN
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
-
355
22.1
INTRODUCTION
----
355
22.2
EASY,
FAST
AND
LEGALLY
SECURE
ACCESS
TO
UPS?
-
356
22.2.1
EASY
ACCESS:
THE
EPO
AS
A
CENTRAL
GRANTING
AUTHORITY
AND
THE
LANGUAGE
REGIME
-
356
22.2.1.1
THE
REQUEST
FOR
UNITARY
EFFECT
AS
A
REPLACEMENT
OF
NATIONAL
VALIDATION
-
356
22.2.1.2
DOWNSIDES
TO
THE
LANGUAGE
REGIME?
-
357
22.2.1.3
CENTRALISED
COLLECTION
OF
RENEWAL
FEES
-
358
22.2.2
VALUE
FOR
MONEY:
COSTS
AND
TERRITORIAL
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
-
358
22.2.2.1
WHAT
IS
AN
'
AVERAGE
'
EP?
-
359
22.2.2.2
DEPENDENCE
OF
TERRITORIAL
COVERAGE
ON
THE
STATUS
OF
RATIFICATIONS
-
360
22.2.2.3
WHO
WILL
USE
THE
SYSTEM?
-
361
22.2.2.4
THE
COMPENSATION
SCHEME
-
362
22.2.2.5
LICENSES
OF
RIGHT
----
362
22.2.3
DURATION
OF
THE
GRANTING
PROCEDURE
AND
TEMPORAL
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
-
363
22.2.3.1
THE
EPO
'
S
IMPROVED
TIMELINESS
-
364
22.2.3.2
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
PATENT
QUALITY
-
364
22.2.3.3
THE
UNHEARD
CALL
FOR
A
DIFFERENTIATED
APPROACH
-
366
22.2.3.4
THE
UP
AND
SPCS
----
367
22.2.4
UNCERTAINTIES
REGARDING
THE
LAW
APPLICABLE
TO
THE
UPC
AS
AN
OBJECT
OF
PROPERTY
-
368
22.2.4.1
DISADVANTAGES
OF
THE
AVAILABLE
INTERPRETATIVE
OPTIONS
-
369
22.2.4.2
IMPACT
ON
PATENT
VALUE
-
370
22.2.4.3
WHICH
ALTERNATIVES
WOULD
HAVE
BEEN
AVAILABLE?
-
370
22.3
INTERIM
CONCLUSION
-
371
THOMAS
JAEGER,
JOHANNES
LUKAN
23
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
PART
II:
(DIS-)ADVANTAGES
FOR
FOLLOW-ON
INVENTORS
IN
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
373
23.1
INTRODUCTION
-
373
23.2
SUBSTANTIVE
SCOPE
OF
PROTECTION
AND
APPLICABLE
LIMITATIONS
-
A
FUNCTIONAL
BALANCE?
-
374
23.2.1
NO
CHANGES
WITH
REGARD
TO
PATENTABILITY?
-
375
23.2.2
A
CASE
FOR
A
PURPOSE-BOUND
COMPOUND
PROTECTION
-
376
23.2.2.1
HOW
COULD
SUCH
ADAPTIONS
BE
MADE?
-
378
23.2.3
THE
APPLICABLE
LIMITATIONS
-
MORE
OF
THE
SAME
-
379
23.2.3.1
LIMITATIONS
STEMMING
FROM
THE
CPCS
----
379
23.2.3.2
LIMITATIONS
STEMMING
FROM
EU
DIRECTIVES
-
380
23.2.3.3
THE
BREEDER
'
S
PRIVILEGE
-
WHY
NOT
ALSO
EXEMPT
NEW
ANIMAL
BREEDS?
-
381
23.2.3.4
THE
BOLAR
AND
THE
GENERAL
RESEARCH
EXCEPTIONS:
A
RACE
TO
THE
BOTTOM?
-
382
23.2.4
COMPULSORY
LICENSES
AND
LIMITATIONS
TO
INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
UNDER
THE
UP
LEGAL
FRAMEWORK
-
388
23.2.4.1
THE
RELATION
BETWEEN
INDIVIDUAL
AND
GENERAL
LIMITATIONS
TO
PATENT
HOLDERS
'
RIGHTS
-----
388
23.2.4.2
THE
LINK
BETWEEN
COMPULSORY
LICENSES
AND
LIMITATIONS
TO
INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
-
388
23.2.4.3
COMPULSORY
LICENCES
LEFT
UNTOUCHED
-
389
23.2.4.4
A
MISSED
OPPORTUNITY
-
390
23.2.4.5
A
PROPORTIONALITY
REQUIREMENT
FOR
INJUNCTIONS
-
391
23.2.4.6
PRESUMED
INCOMPATIBILITY
WITH
EU
LAW
OF
INDIVIDUAL
RESTRAINTS
OF
PATENT
PROTECTION
-
394
23.3
OVERALL
CONCLUSION:
A
SYSTEM
FIT
FOR
INNOVATION?
-
395
MAXIMILIAN
HAEDICKE
24
PATENT
MEDIATION
-
397
24.1
INTRODUCTION
-
397
24.1.1
DEFINITION
AND
LEGAL
BASIS
-
397
24.1.2
GUIDING
PRINCIPLES
-
398
24.1.2.1
CONFIDENTIALITY
-
399
24.1.2.2
VOLUNTARINESS
----
399
24.1.2.3
OPENNESS
----
399
24.1.2.4
ALL-PARTIALITY
/
NEUTRALITY
-----399
24.1.2.5
LEGAL
INFORMATION
----
399
24.1.3
THE
COURSE
OF
IP
MEDIATION
PROCEEDINGS
-
400
24.1.3.1
FIRST
CONTACT
----
400
24.1.3.2
PREPARATION
-
400
24.1.3.3
OPENING
-
PHASE
I
----
401
24.1.3.4
EXPLORATION
OF
FACTS
AND
IDENTIFICATION
OF
ISSUES
-
PHASE
II
-
402
24.1.3.5
WORKING
THROUGH
THE
AREAS
OF
CONFLICT
-
PHASE
III
-
402
24.1.3.6
NEGOTIATION
AND
PROBLEM
SOLVING
-
PHASE
IV
-
403
24.1.3.7
DRAFTING
A
FINAL
AGREEMENT
-
PHASE
V
-
404
24.1.3.8
ENFORCEMENT
OF
MEDIATION
SETTLEMENTS
-
404
24.1.4
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
MEDIATOR
----
405
24.1.4.1
GENERAL
----
405
24.1.4.2
THE
MEDIATOR
'
S
TECHNIQUES
FOR
CONFLICT
RESOLUTION
-
405
24.1.4.3
SPECIAL
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
MEDIATORS
IN
PATENT
DISPUTES
-
406
24.1.5
OPPORTUNITIES
AND
CHALLENGES
OF
MEDIATION
IN
GENERAL
-
406
24.2
PATENT
CONFLICTS
SUITABLE
FOR
MEDIATION
-
407
24.2.1
LICENCE
AGREEMENTS
-
407
24.2.2
INTERNATIONAL
AND
COMPLEX
DISPUTES
-
408
24.2.3
DISPUTES
REQUIRING
CONFIDENTIALITY
-
408
24.2.4
FURTHER
ADVANTAGES
OF
MEDIATION
-
409
24.3
CONCLUSION
-----
410
ALAN
JOHNSON
25
LITIGATION
STRATEGIES
AND
BIFURCATION
-
411
25.1
INTRODUCTION
-----
411
25.2
FORUM
SHOPPING
WITHIN
THE
UPC
-----
413
25.2.1
THE
CLAIMANT
PERSPECTIVE
----
414
25.2.2
THE
NON-PATENTEE
DEFENDANT
PERSPECTIVE
-
417
25.2.3
THE
PATENTEE
DEFENDANT
PERSPECTIVE
-
417
25.2.4
CONCLUSIONS
ON
THE
'
BALANCE
OF
POWER
-
418
25.3
FORUM
SHOPPING
BETWEEN
NATIONAL
AND
UPC
JURISDICTIONS
IN
THE
TRANSITIONAL
PERIOD
-----
418
25.4
ANTI-SUIT
INJUNCTIONS
----
420
25.5
CONCLUSIONS
-
A
MORE
UNCERTAIN
WORLD
FOR
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LITIGATION
-
422
MATTHIAS
LAMPING,
CHRISTOPH
RADEMACHER
26
PATENT
LITIGATION
STRATEGIES
IN
GERMANY:
MANEUVERING
THE
EVOLVING
LANDSCAPE
OF
BIFURCATION
-
423
26.1
BIFURCATION
OF
PROCEEDINGS
-
423
26.1.1
GERMA
NY
-
423
26.1.1.1
BASIC
STRUCTURE,
LEGAL
BASIS
AND
EFFECT
-
423
26.1.1.2
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
A
STAY
OF
THE
INFRINGEMENT
PROCEDURE
-
425
26.1.1.3
COMMUNICATION
BETWEEN
PATENT
COURT
AND
INFRINGEMENT
COURTS
-
427
26.1.2
UNIFIED
PATENT
COURT
-
431
26.1.2.1
INSTITUTIONAL
STRUCTURE
OF
THE
UPC
-
431
26.1.2.2
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
----
432
26.1.3
JAPAN
----
436
26.2
IMPLICATIONS
FOR
LITIGATION
-
439
26.2.1
GENERAL
REMARKS
-----
439
26.2.2
LITIGATING
IN
GERMANY
-
440
26.2.2.1
TIMING
OF
REVOCATION
AND
INFRINGEMENT
ACTIONS
-
440
26.2.2.2
STAY
OF
INFRINGEMENT
PROCEEDINGS
-
441
26.2.2.3
COMPENSATION
FOR
INJURY
CAUSED
BY
ENFORCEMENT
-
442
26.2.3
LITIGATING
BEFORE
THE
UPC
----
442
26.2.3.1
INFRINGEMENT
ACTIONS
BROUGHT
BY
LICENSEES
-
443
26.2.3.2
PARALLEL
REVOCATION
AND
COUNTERCLAIM
-
444
26.2.3.3
COMPENSATION
FOR
INJURY
CAUSED
BY
ENFORCEMENT
-
444
26.3
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
-
445
PART
3:
CO-EXISTENCE
AND
ALTERNATIVES
MARC
MIMLER
27
THE
CO-EXISTENCE
BETWEEN
EPC
AND
PATENTS
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
449
27.1
INTRODUCTION
------
449
27.2
MAIN
BODY
------
450
27.2.1
HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND
-----
450
27.2.2
OCCURRENCE
-------452
27.2.2.1
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
(I.E.
UPS)
-
453
27.2.2.2
CLASSICAL
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
FALLING
WITHIN
THE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
-
454
27.2.2.3
EUROPEAN
PATENTS
WHICH
DO
NOT
FALL
WITHIN
THE
JURISDICTION
OF
THE
UPC
-
-
454
27.2.2.4
NATIONAL
PATENTS
-
-
458
27.2.3
ADJUDICATION
AND
SUBSTANTIVE
LAW
-
459
27.2.3.1
THE
UPC
'
S
EXCLUSIVE
COMPETENCE
-
459
27.2.3.2
COMPETENCE
OF
NATIONAL
COURTS
AND
APPLICABLE
LAW
-
460
27.3
CONCLUSION
----
461
KAREN
WALSH
28
INSTITUTIONAL
COEXISTENCE:
THE
NECESSITY
OF
JUDICIAL
DIALOGUE
AND
COOPERATION
IN
THE
UPC
-
463
28.1
INTRODUCTION
-
463
28.2
THE
UPC
-----
464
28.3
HARMONISATION
AND
THE
UPC
-
468
28.4
THE
NECESSITY
OF
JUDICIAL
DIALOGUE
AND
COOPERATION
IN
THE
UPC
-
471
28.5
CONCLUSION
-
474
TAMAR
KHUCHUA
29
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
IN
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
FROM
A
PROCEDURAL
PERSPECTIVE
-
477
INTRODUCTIONS
-
477
29.1
EU
LEGISLATION
IN
PATENT
LAW
AND
THE
CJEU
'
S
CURRENT
ROLE
IN
THE
PATENT
FIELD
-
478
29.2
AVENUES
LEADING
TO
CJEU
JUDGMENTS
ON
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
AND
AVAILABLE
CASE
LAW
-
480
29.3
GUARANTEEING
AN
EU-LAW
COMPLIANT
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
PROCEDURE
WITHIN
NATIONAL
COURTS
BASED
ON
THE
ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTIVE
-
483
29.3.1
CJEU
RULINGS
ON
INTERIM
AND
PROVISIONAL
MEASURES
IN
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
-
485
29.3.2
THE
ISSUE
OF
REIMBURSEMENT
OF
LEGAL
COSTS
IN
PATENT
PROCEEDINGS
CLARIFIED
BY
THE
CJEU
489
29.3.3
CJEU
PROVIDING
GUIDANCE
ON
PROCEDURAL
GUARANTEES
IN
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
IN
THE
LIGHT
OF
EU
COMPETITION
LAW
-
491
29.4
THE
FUTURE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
IN
PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS
OF
PATENT
ENFORCEMENT
AT
THE
UPC
-
493
29.5
CONCLUSION
-
495
NAOMI
HAWKINS
30
GENE
PATENTS
IN
THE
EPC
AND
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
WITH
UNITARY
EFFECT
-
497
30.1
INTRODUCTION
-
497
30.1.1
DEFINITION
OF
GENE
PATENTS
-
498
30.1.2
CURRENT
TECHNICAL
LANDSCAPE
-
499
30.2
PATENTS
ON
GENES
-
THE
HISTORICAL
CONCERNS
-
502
30.3
GENE
PATENTS
IN
EUROPEAN
PATENT
LAW
-
CURRENT
PRESSING
QUESTIONS
-
504
30.3.1
ETHICS
AND
MORALITY
-
THE
APPLICATION
OF
THE
MORALITY
EXCLUSION
-
504
30.3.2
ADDRESSING
ACCESS
CONCERNS
-
508
30.3.3
DIVERGENCE
OF
APPROACHES
-
DOES
THE
UPC
OFFER
POSSIBILITIES
FOR
INCREASED
HARMONISATION?
-
511
30.3.3.1
A
SINGLE
FORUM
-
513
30.3.3.2
THE
ROLE
OF
THE
CJEU
----
513
30.3.3.3
PERSUASIVE
STANDARDS
-
514
30.4
CONCLUSION
-
515
AISLING
MCMAHON
31
DECISION-MAKERS,
INSTITUTIONAL
INFLUENCES
AND
THE
ROLE
OF
ETHICAL
ISSUES
IN
THE
PATENTING
OF
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
INVENTIONS
IN
EUROPE:
ENTER
THE
UNITARY
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
517
INTRODUCTION
-
517
31.1
PATENTING
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
INVENTIONS
IN
EUROPE:
THE
EMBEDDING
OF
ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
WITHIN
THE
BIOTECHNOLOGY
DIRECTIVE
98/44/EC
-
519
31.1.1
DRAFTING
OF
THE
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
DIRECTIVE
AND
ETHIC
-
520
31.1.2
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
AND
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
521
31.2
APPLYING
THE
DIRECTIVE
'
S
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
IN
EUROPE:
INTERPRETATIVE
COMMUNITIES,
INSTITUTIONAL
OVERLAPS
&
INFLUENCES
-
522
31.2.1
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
WITHIN
THE
DIRECTIVE
&
PRACTICAL
INTERPRETATION
-
PRE-UPC
-
522
31.2.2
INSTITUTIONAL
OVERLAPS
&
ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
-
ENTER
THE
UPC
-
523
31.2.3
INTERPRETATIVE
COMMUNITIES
AND
THE
UPC
'
S
ROLE
IN
INTERPRETING
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
WITHIN
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
525
31.2.3.1
ETHICAL
ISSUES,
DISCRETION
&
THE
INTERPRETATIVE
ROLE
OF
DECISION-MAKERS
IN
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
526
31.2.3.2
INSTITUTIONAL
INFLUENCES
AND
OVERLAPPING
EPO,
CJEU
AND
UPC
FUNCTIONS:
INTERPRETATING
ETHICAL
PROVISIONS
IN
THE
DIRECTIVE
-
527
31.3
TECHNOLOGICAL
DEVELOPMENTS
AND
THE
NEED
FOR
A
RENEWED
CONVERSATION
ON
THE
ROLE
ETHICAL
ISSUES
SHOULD
PLAY
WITHIN
THE
EUROPEAN
PATENT
SYSTEM
-
529
31.4
CONCLUDING
THOUGHTS
-
530
GAIL
E
EVANS
32
THE
UPC
AND
THE
FRAND
INJUNCTION
-
533
32.1
THE
DISCRETION
OF
THE
UPC
TO
GRANT
A
FINAL
INJUNCTION
-
-
536
32.1.1
THE
ENGLISH
COURTS
AND
THE
DISCRETIONARY
GRANT
OF
AN
INJUNCTION
-
537
32.2
THE
FRAND
UNDERTAKING
AND
THE
COURT
'
S
DISCRETION
TO
GRANT
A
FINAL
INJUNCTION
-
539
32.2.1
USE
OF
THE
FRAND
INJUNCTION
TO
DEFEAT
HOLD-OUT
STRATEGIES
-
541
32.3
THE
DISCRETION
TO
AWARD
DAMAGES
AS
AN
ALTERNATE
AND
ADEQUATE
REMEDY
-
543
32.4
WITHHOLDING
AN
INJUNCTION
BASED
ON
THE
FRAND
DEFENCE
OF
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
-
545
32.4.1
HUAWEI
V
ZTE:
A
'
SAFE
HARBOUR
'
FROM
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
-
547
32.4.2
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
GIVING
THE
IMPLEMENTER
NOTICE
OF
PATENT
INFRINGEMENT
-
548
32.4.3
ASSESSING
'
ABUSE
OF
DOMINANCE
'
-
549
32.4.3.1
OFFERING
A
GLOBAL
LICENCE
----
550
32.4.3.2
BUNDLING
SEPS
AND
NON-SEPS
-
550
32.4.3.3
THE
REASONABLENESS
OF
THE
ROYALTY
RATE
-
-
551
32.5
NO
ENTITLEMENT
TO
AN
INJUNCTION
WHERE
THE
DEFENDANT
IS
A
WILLING
LICENSEE
-
552
32.5.1
PROOF
OF
AN
IMPLEMENTER'S
'
WILLINGNESS
'
TO
ENTER
INTO
A
FRAND
LICENCE
----
553
32.6
CONCLUSION:
FRAND
INJUNCTIONS,
CONSISTENCY
OF
DECISION-MAKING
AND
ARBITRATION
-----
555
INDEX
-
557 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author2 | Matthews, Duncan 1965- Torremans, Paul 1965- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | d m dm p t pt |
| author_GND | (DE-588)171098218 (DE-588)124315070 |
| author_facet | Matthews, Duncan 1965- Torremans, Paul 1965- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048987333 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3800 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1409104279 (DE-599)DNB1285329716 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048987333</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240201</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230605s2023 gw |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">23,N15</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1285329716</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110774016</subfield><subfield code="c">hardcover: EUR 198.00 (DE) (freier Preis), EUR 198.00 (AT) (freier Preis)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-077401-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110774011</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-077401-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110774016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1409104279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1285329716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3800</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139790:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">23sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European patent law</subfield><subfield code="b">the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention</subfield><subfield code="c">Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b"><<De>> Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXII, 558 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm x 17 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Gruyter Reference</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Patentrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044884-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EU Patent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Unified Patent Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Community Patent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Patentrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044884-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthews, Duncan</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171098218</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Torremans, Paul</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124315070</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10095502-2</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-078171-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-078168-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">X:MVB</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110774016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034250730&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">vlb</subfield><subfield code="d">20230404</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034250730</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| id | DE-604.BV048987333 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:06:27Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:19:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)10095502-2 |
| isbn | 9783110774016 3110774011 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034250730 |
| oclc_num | 1409104279 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 |
| physical | XXXII, 558 Seiten 24 cm x 17 cm |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | <<De>> Gruyter |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | De Gruyter Reference |
| spelling | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans Berlin <<De>> Gruyter 2023 XXXII, 558 Seiten 24 cm x 17 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier De Gruyter Reference Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Patentrecht (DE-588)4044884-8 gnd rswk-swf EU Patent Patent Law Unified Patent Court Community Patent (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Patentrecht (DE-588)4044884-8 s DE-604 Matthews, Duncan 1965- (DE-588)171098218 edt Torremans, Paul 1965- (DE-588)124315070 edt Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG (DE-588)10095502-2 pbl Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB 978-3-11-078171-7 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 978-3-11-078168-7 X:MVB https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110774016 DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034250730&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p vlb 20230404 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb |
| spellingShingle | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Patentrecht (DE-588)4044884-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4044884-8 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |
| title_auth | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |
| title_exact_search | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |
| title_exact_search_txtP | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |
| title_full | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans |
| title_fullStr | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans |
| title_full_unstemmed | European patent law the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention Edited by Duncan Matthews and Paul Torremans |
| title_short | European patent law |
| title_sort | european patent law the unified patent court and the european patent convention |
| title_sub | the Unified Patent Court and the European Patent Convention |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Patentrecht (DE-588)4044884-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Patentrecht Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110774016 http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034250730&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewsduncan europeanpatentlawtheunifiedpatentcourtandtheeuropeanpatentconvention AT torremanspaul europeanpatentlawtheunifiedpatentcourtandtheeuropeanpatentconvention AT walterdegruytergmbhcokg europeanpatentlawtheunifiedpatentcourtandtheeuropeanpatentconvention |