Otvătre navăn: a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene
Отвътре навън a priori обосноваване, интуиции и концептуално владеене
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | Bulgarian |
| Published: |
Sofija
Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ochridski"
2022
|
| Edition: | Părvo izdanie |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Item Description: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 211-219 |
| Physical Description: | 222 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789540756172 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048970402 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230913 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230523s2022 bu |||| 00||| bul d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789540756172 |9 978-954-07-5617-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1392146640 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048970402 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bul | |
| 044 | |a bu |c BG | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |6 880-01 |a Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen |d 1997- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |6 880-03 |a Otvătre navăn |b a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |c Madlen Angelova-Elčinova |
| 250 | |6 880-02 |a Părvo izdanie | ||
| 264 | 1 | |6 880-04 |a Sofija |b Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ochridski" |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 222 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 211-219 | ||
| 546 | |a Text bulgarisch | ||
| 546 | |b Kyrillisch | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Intuition |0 (DE-588)4027532-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Intuition |0 (DE-588)4027532-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ljuckanov, Rosen |d 1979- |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 880 | 1 | |6 100-01/(N |a Ангелова-Елчинова, Мадлен |a ut | |
| 880 | |6 250-02/(N |a Първо издание | ||
| 880 | 1 | 0 | |6 245-03/(N |a Отвътре навън |b a priori обосноваване, интуиции и концептуално владеене |c Мадлен Ангелова-Елчинова |
| 880 | 1 | |6 264-04/(N |a София |b Университетско издателство "Св. Климент Охридски" |c 2022 | |
| 940 | 1 | |f sla | |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20230913 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034234021 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 499 |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804185209342525440 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Съдържание Благодарности ............................................................................... 9 Встъпителни бележки........................................................................................................... 11 Увод
........................................................................................................................................... 15 ГЛАВА ПЪРВА РАЗГРАНИЧЕНИЕТО A PRIORI -A POSTERIORI........................................................ 21 1.1. Класическата концепция за a priori
.................................................................... 23 1.1.1. Какво може и какво не може да бъде априорно.............................................24 1.1.2. Аналитични и концептуални истини.................................... .......................... 26 1.1.3. Необходимост и
априорност............................................................................ 32 1.1.4. Негативна и позитивна концепция...................................................................36 1.1.5. Аргумент срещу класическото разграничение............................................... 37
1.1.6. Мотивация за запазване на концепцията ....................................................... 48 1.2. Новото a priori .........................................................................................................53 1.2.1. Аргіогі-
та............................................................................................................... 54 1.2.2. Контингентност на априорните твърдения..................................................... 60
1.2.3. Фалсифицируемост на априорните твърдения.............................................. 64 1.2.4. Опит и априорност .............................................................................................. 66 1.2.5. Процеси и способности...................................................................................... 72 1.2.6. Ролята на разбирането в новата концепция ................................................... 75 1.2.7. Функция на новата концепция........................................................................... 79
ГЛАВА ВТОРА СТОЙНОСТТА НА ИНТУИЦИИТЕ ................................................................................ 83 2.1. Интуиции и нагледи.............................................................................................. 85 2.1.1. Интуицията като концептуална
компетентност.......................................... 89 2.1.2. Интуиции и самоочевидни твърдения........................................................... 91 2.1.3. Дефиниране на интуиция..................................................................................95 2.1.4. Сурови интуиции
(brute intuitions).................................................................. 99 2.2. Евиденциален статус на интуициите .............................................................. 102 2.2.1. Претенции срещу липсата на надеждност................................................... 103 2.2.2.
Специфичен неемпиричен евиденциален статус........................................ 107 2.2.3. Добри и лоши интуиции...................................................................................ПО 2.2.4. Аргументът от липса на
знание...................................................................... 112 ГЛАВА ТРЕТА ОБОСНОВАВАНЕ БЕЗ ИНТУИЦИИ ПО ФИЛОСОФСКИ ...................................... 115 3.1. Философско познание и абдукция.....................................................................119 3.1.1.
Характеристики на абдуктивните изводи..................................................... 121 3.1.2. Проблеми пред извода към най-доброто обяснение................................... 125 3.1.3.
Прецизиране на абдуктивните допускания и формулиране на критерии за изводимост........................................128 3.2. Мисловно равновесие (МР) ....................... 133 3.2.1. Какво представлява мисловното равновесие................................................ 134 3.2.2. Обмислени съждения........................................................................................ 144 3.2.2.1. Как да дефинираме обмислените съждения.............................................. 145 3.2.2.2. Какво прави моралните съждения специални...........................................147 3.2.2.3. Ограниченията върху обмислените съждения.......................................... 152 3.2.3. Актуално равновесие........................................................................................ 156 3.3. Изводи към дебата екстернализъм срещу интернализъм по отношение на обосноваването.................................. 165 6
ГЛАВА ЧЕТВЪРТА МЕНТАЛНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ ........................................................................................... 167 4.1. Какво се разбира под „ментално съдържание“............................................... 169 4.1.1. Езикови изрази и техните ментални
еквиваленти........................................171 4.1.2. Представяне на менталното съдържание посредством „че“ клаузи.......172 4.1.3. Позиции по отношение на менталното съдържание ................................. 174 4.2. Притежаване на концепти и концептуални
истини........................................179 4.2.1. Концептуално владеене .................................................................................. 180 4.2.2. Перфектни говорители ................................................................................... 183 4.2.3. Импликации
от приемането на перфектни говорители.............................. 187 4.2.4. Импликации от отказа от перфектни говорители........................................ 190 4.3. Функционални теории за концепциите............................................................ 194 4.3.1. Перцептивни
(сензорно-моторни) и концептуални примитиви.............. 195 4.3.2. Аналогията между функция на употребата в езика и функция на концептуалната употреба............................................. 197 4.3.3. Функция на системата срещу функция на концепта.................................. 200 4.3.4.
Интернализъм, функционализъм, субективизъм ........................................201 4.4. Натурализация на екстернализма по отношение на менталното
съдържание..........................................................................203 4.4.1. Социален екстернализъм и широк физически екстернализъм................. 204 4.4.2. Натурализация на екстернализма.................................................................. 205 ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ ................................................................................................................... 207 БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ ........................................ 211 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 1. ПРЕВОДИ HA ПОНЯТИЯ .............................................................. 220 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 2. ИЗПОЛЗВАНИ АБРЕВИАТУРИ ................................................... 222 7
БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ Ангелова, M. (2018). Съвременни проблеми около понятието за a priori ֊ случаят Уилямсън. - В: Харизанова, О. (съст.). Докторантски четения. Т.1. София: Универ ситетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“, 43-52. Ангелова-Елчинова, Μ. (2020). Прецизиране на абдуктивните допускания и
формули ране на критерии за изводимост. - В: Елчинов, Д. (съст.). Пътища на познанието. София: Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“. Бакалова, Μ. (2012). Знаем ли нещо за външния свят? София: Звезди. Бачев, Μ. (2016). Религията между разума и чувствата: Имануел Кант и Рудолф Ото.
NotaBene, 32. https://notabene-bg.org/read.php?id=379 (20.12.2019) Василев, С. (1978). Интуиция и творчество. София: БАН. Гаврилов, А. (1975). Към въпроса за природата на съзнанието. София: Софийски уни верситет „Климент Охридски“. Гурова, Л. (2018). Куайн за диспозиционните обяснения като белег за
незряла наука и една алтернативна гледна точка. - Във: Философски алтернативи, 6, 20-29. Гурова, Л. (2019). Обяснение, разбиране и извод. София: Нов български университет. Иванов, Д. (2015). Теории за истината. София: Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“. Иванова, А. (2020). Да вярваш
рационално. Велико Търново: ИТИ. Илиев, А. (1932). Художествено и научно творчество. София: Просвета, 155-162. Йорданов, П. (1943). Литературата като познание. - Във: Философски преглед, XV (2), 118-137. Казанджиев, С. (1982). Истина и очевидност. - В: Бъчваров, Μ., Димитрова, Н. (съст.) Спиридон
Казанджиев. Философски и психологически съчинения. София: Наука и изкуство, 74-192. Кант, И. (2013). Критика на
чистия разум. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“. Карагеоргиева, А. (2013). Увод в съвременната теория на познанието. София: Проектория. Ковачев, В. (1987). Теоретичното познание ֊ методологически проблеми. София: Наука и изкуство. 211
Куайн, У. (2008). Две догми на емпиризма. - В: Полименов, Т., Латинов, Е., Бешкова, А., Моллов, Б. (съст.) Философия на логиката II. София: Изток-Запад, 88-110. Кулов, В. (2011). Препрочитайки Димитър Михалчев. - В: Български философски преглед, кн. 1,15-38. Кулов, В. (2013). Философията като
проблем в българската книжнина на XX век. Со фия: ИБФК. Михалчев, Д. (1914). Форма и отношение. София: Софийски университет. Михалчев, Д. (1981). Избрани съчинения (съст. К. Дарковски). София: Наука и изку ство. Нечев, К. (2013). Рецепции и употреби на Ницшевите идеи в творчеството на Янко Янев. -
В: Известия. Т. XIII, 71-85. Николов, Б. (2015). Кратка история нааприорността. -В: NotaBene, 30. http://notabenebg.org/read.php?id=352 (20.12.2019) Павлов, T. (1942). Съвременни философски учения. София: „Д. Гологановъ“. Павлов, Т. (1945). Теория на отражението. София: Нариздат. Пеев, Д. (2019).
Мястото на интелекта в теориите за съзнанието от по-висок ред (ТСПР). - Във: Философия, 28 (3), 295-303. Сивилов, Л. (1980). Системното познание. София: Наука и изкуство. Спасов, Д. (1969). Анализ на познанието. София: Наука и изкуство. Цацов, Д. (2008). Шест десетилетия дискусии за епистемологията.
- В: Проданов, В., Владимиров, Л. (съст.). Шест десетилетия академична философия. София: ИФИБАН, 89-111. Янев, Я. (1925). Философията на Бергсон. ֊ В: Златорог, 8/9,350-360. Alexander, J. Weinberg, J. (2014). The ‘Unreliability’ of Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Machery, E. O’Neill, E. (eds.). Current
Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge, 128-145. Alston, W. (1993). The reliability of sense
perception. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Altehenger, H., Gaus, S. Menges, A. L. (2015). Being Realistic about Reflective Equilib rium. - In: Analysis, 75 (3), 514-522. Atkins, R. (2016). Pierce and the Conduct of Life. Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Re ligion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Armstrong, D. Μ. (1981). What is Consciousness? - In: The Nature of Mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 55-67. Arras, J. (2007). The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. - In: Bon nie Steinbock (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 46-71. Arvan, Μ. (2013). Groundwork for a New Moral Epistemology. Klesis, 27, 155-190. Audi, R. (1998). Moderate Intuiționism and the Epistemology of Moral Judgment. - In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1(1), 15^14. 212
Audi, R. (1999). Self-Evidence. ֊ In: Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (sl3), 205-228. Audi, R. (2009). The Good in the Right. A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Ayer, A. (1946). Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications. Baderin, A. (2017). Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Social Theory and Practice, 43(1), 1-28. Bates, J. (2005). The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Dialectica, 59 (3), 347-356. Dealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. - In: DePaul, Μ. Ramsey, W. (eds.). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Maryland: Rowman Littlefield, 201-240. Dealer, G. (1999). The A Priori. - In: Greco and Sosa (eds.). The Blackwell Guide to Episte mology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 243-270. Bedke, Μ. (2008). Ethical Intuitions: What They Are, What They Are Not, and How They Justify. American Philosophical Quarterly, 45 (3), 253-270. Bedke, Μ. (2019). Moral Intuition. - In: Zimmerman, A., Jones, K., Timmons, Μ. The Root ledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology, 360-374. Blackford, R. (2006). Stem Cell Research on Other Worlds, or Why Embryos Do Not Have a Right to Life. - In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 177-180. Boghossian, P. (1996). Analyticity Reconsidered. - In: Nous, 30 (3), 360-391. Boghossian, P. (1997). Analyticity. - In: Hale, B. and Wright, C. (eds.). Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell, 331-368. Boghossian, P. Peacocke, C. (2000). Introduction. - In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C.
(eds.). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-10. BonJour, L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. A Rationalist Account of A priori Justifica tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BonJour, L. (2003). A version of internalist foundationism. - In: Sosa, E. (ed.). Epistemic Justification. Internalism VS Externalism. Foundationism VS Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell, 3-96. Boyd, K. Nagel, J. (2014). The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Machery, E. O’Neill, E. (eds.). - In: Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge, 109-127. Brandt, R. (1990). The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Ethics, 100(2), 295-278. Brink, D. (2014). Principles and Intuitions in Ethics. Historical and Contemporary Perspec tives. Ethics, 124,1-30. Buckwaiter, W. Stephen, S. (2014). Gender and Philosophical Intuition. - In: Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 307-346. Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. - In: Midwest studies in philosophy, 4 (1), 73-121. 213
Burge, T. (1986). Intellectual norms and foundations of mind. - In: Journal of Philosophy, 83, 697-720. Burge, T. (1993). Content Preservation. - In: The Philosophical Review, 102 (4), 457-488. Burge, T. (1997). Interlocution, Perception and Memory. - In: Philosophical Studies, 86 (1), 21^17. Burge, T. (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67 (3), 503-548. Butchvarov, P. (1970). The Concept of Knowledge. Evanston: Northern University Press. Butchvarov, P. (1989). Scepticism in Ethics. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press. Butchvarov, P. (1998). Skepticism about the External World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Butchvarov, P. (2015). Anthropocentrism in Philosophy. Realism, Antirealism, Semirealism. Berlin: De Gruyter. Campbell, R. (2007). What is Moral Judgment? - In: Journal of Philosophy, 104 (7), 321֊ 349. Campos, D. (2011). On the Distinction Between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation. - In: Synthese, 180,419^142. Cao, J. (2006). A Critique to the Significance of Gettier Counter-Examples. ֊ In: Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 1 (4), 675-687. Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carbon, C. (2014). Understanding Human Perception by Human-made Illusions. - In: Fron tiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (Article 566), 1-6. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carter, W. (1976). On A Priori Contingent Truths. - In: Analysis, 36 (2), 105-106 Daniels, N. (1979). Casullo, A. (2001). Experience and A Priori
Justification (Review). - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63 (3), 665-671. Casullo, A. (2003). A Priori Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Casullo, A. (2013). Articulating the A priori - A posteriori Distinction. - In: Casullo, A. Thurow, J. (eds.). The APriori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 249-273. Casullo, A. (2015). Four Challenges to the A Priori-A Posteriori Distinction. - In: Synthese, 192 (9), 2701-2724. Cummins, R. (1998). Reflection on Reflective Equilibrium. - In: DePaul, Μ. Ramsey, W. (eds.). Rethinking Intuition. Rowman Littlefield. 113-128. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. - In: The Journal of Philosophy, 76 (5), 256-282. Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. Day, T. Kincaid, H. (1994). Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place. - In: Synthese, 98,271-295. Delisen, F. (2017). Abductively robust inference. ֊ In: Analysis, 77 (1), 20-29. 214
De Maagt, S. (2017). Reflective Equilibrium and Moral Objectivity? ֊ In: Inquiry: An Inter disciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 60 (5), 443^165. DePaul, Μ. (2005). Reflective Equilibrium. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Encyclopedia, com. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcriptsandmaps/reflective-equilibrium (30.11.2018) Douglas, K., Sutton, R. Cichocka, A. (2019). The Social Psychology of Gullibility. Routledge. Dretske, F. (1997). Naturalising the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. Dummett, Μ. (1996). The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Eggleston, B. (2010). Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think about Morality. - In: Mind, 119 (475), 549-584. Elgin, C. (1996). Considered Judgments. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Elliott, E. (2017). Ramsey without ethical neutrality. - In: Mind, 126 (501), 1-52. Evans, G. (1979). Reference and Contingency. - In: The Monist, 62, 161-189. Enoch, D. (2011). Taking Morality Seriously: a Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. Frankena, W. (1939). The Naturalistic Fallacy. - In: Mind, 48 (192), 464^177. Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? - In: Analysis, 23 (6), 121-123. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral Intuitions. Fast and Frugal Heuristics? - In: Sinnott-Arm strong, W. (ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science of Morality - Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1-26. Glazier, Μ. (2017). The Difference between Epistemic and Metaphysical Necessity. - In: Synthese, 1-16. Glock, H. Kaihat, J. (2018). Linguistic Turn. -
In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/linguistic-turn/v-l Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goldman, A. (2013). Philosophical Naturalism and Intuitional Metodology. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 11^14. Greene, J. (2007). The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul. - In: Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 3,36-79. Greene, J. (2016). Solving the Trolley Problem. ֊ In: Sytsma, J. and Buckwaiter, W. (eds.). A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Grozdanoff, B. (2014). A Priori Revisability in Science. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: Asocial Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. - In: Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. Hales, S. (2012). The Faculty of Intuition. - In: Analytic Philosophy, 53 (2), 180-207. Hare, R. Μ. (1973). Rawls’s Theory of Justice. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 23 (91), 144-155. 215
Harman, G. (1965). The Inference to the Best Explanation. - In: Philosophical Review, 74 (1), 88-95. Haslett, D. W. (1987). What is Wrong with Reflective Equilibrium? - In: Philosophical Quarterly, 37 (148), 305-311. Harman, G. (1982). Conceptual Role Semantics. - In: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23 (2), 242-256. Hart, J. Graether, Μ. (2018). Something’s Going on Here: Psychological Predictors of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. - In: Journal of Individual Differences, 39(4), 229-237. Hawthorne, J. (2002). Deeply Contingent A Priori Knowledge. - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LXV (2), 247-269. Hawthorne, J. (2007). Externalism and the Apriori. - In: Goldberg, S. (ed.). Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201-218. Henderson, D. Horgan, T. (2001). The A Priori isn’t All it is Cracked out to Be, but it is Something. - In: Philosophical Topics, 29 (1/2), 219-250. Henderson, D. Horgan, T. (2013). On the Armchair Justification of Conceptually Grounded Necessary Truths. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 111-133. Hill, C. (2013). Concepts, Teleology and Rational Revision. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The Apriori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 134-157. Hill, C. (2010). I love Machery’s book, but love concepts more. - In: Philosophical Studies, 149 (3). 411-421. Hopp, W. (2009). Husserl, Dummett and the Linguistic Turn. - In: Grazer Philosophische Studien, 78 (1), 17^-0. Ichikawa, J. (2013). Experimental
Philosophy and the Apriority. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). - In: The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 45-66. Jabr, F. (2012). How Brainless Slime Mold Redefine Intelligence. - In: Nature. https://doi. org/10.1038/nature.2012.11811 (22.10.2022) Jenkins, C. A. (2008). Grounding Concepts: An Empirical Basis for Arithmetical Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenkins, C. S. I. (2013). Naturalistic Challenges to the A Priori. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 274—290. Kelly, T. McGrath, S. (2010). Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough? - In: Philosophical Per spectives, 24 (1), 325-359. Kitcher, P. (1980). Apriority and Necessity. - In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58 (2), 89-101. Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (2008). An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto. - In: Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 3-16. Kobes, B. (2010). Burge’s Dualism 1. - In: Koons, R. Dealer, G. (eds.). The Waning of Materialism. Oxford University Press, 215-232. Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. 216
Kuipers, T. (1992). Naive and Refined Truth Approximation. Synthese 93 (3), 299-341. Ladyman, J., Douven, L, Horsten, L., Van Fraassen, В. (1997). A Defense of van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Inference: A Reply to Psillos. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (188), 305-321. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge. Little, D. (1984). Reflective Equilibrium and Justification. - In: Southern Journal of Philosophy, 22 (3), 373-387. Lobanovska, Μ. Pilla, G. (2017). Penicillin’s Discovery and Antibiotic Resistance: Les sons for the Future? - In: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 90, 135—145. Lupyan, G. (2017). How Reliable Is Perception? - In: Philosophical Topics, 45(1), 81-106. Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. Stich, S. (2004). Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style. Cognition, 92(3), 1-12. Maddy, P. (2000). Naturalism and the A Priori. - In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds.). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 92-116. Malmgren, A. (2013). A Priori Testimony Revisited. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 158-185. Mitova, V. (2017). Believable Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moore, G. E. (1942). A Reply to My Critics. - In: Schlipp, P. (ed.). The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 533-677. Moser, P. (1987). Introduction. - In: Moser, P. (ed.). A Priori Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mormman, T. (2012). Toward a Theory of the Pragmatic A Priori. From Carnap to Lewis and Beyond. - In: Rudolf Carnap and the
Legacy of Logical Empiricism, 16, 113-132. Nagel, J. (2007). Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Philosophy Compass, 2 (6), 792-819. Nichols, P. (2012). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method of Justification in Bioethics. In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33 (5), 325-341. Niiniluoto, I. (2014). Representation and Truth Likeness. ֊ In: Foundations of Science, 19 (4), 375-379. Nielsen, K. (1982). Considered Judgments Again. - In: Human Studies, 5 (1), 109-118. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Pancheri, L. (1971). James, Lewis and the Pragmatic A Priori. ֊ In: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7 (3), 135-114. Papineau, D. (2015). Naturalism. - In: Zalta, E. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/ (22.12.2019) Pavlov, T. (1973). On Truths and the Truth. - In: Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 1. Sofia: Sofia Press, 99-104. Peacocke, C. (2001). Does Perception have a Nonconceptual Content? - In: Journal of Phi losophy, 98 (5), 239-264. Peirce, C. S. [CP] (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Hartshorne, C., Weiss P. and Burks, A., eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 217
Plantinga, A. (1996). Respondeo. - In: (Kvanvig, J. Ed.). Warrant in contemporary episte mology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 307-378. Pollock, J. ( 1999). The Gettier Problem. - In: Crumley II, J. (ed.). Readings in Epistemology. London:Mayfield Publishing Company. Popovic, N. (2015). Why Truth is not a Necessary Condition for Knowledge. ֊ In: The Philosophical Forum, 46 (4), 397-401. Prichard, H. A. (1950). Knowledge and Perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Priest, G. (1989). Dialectic and Dialetheic. Science Society, 53 (4), 388—415. Priest, G. (2013). Between the Homs of Idealism and Realism. The Middle Way of Madhyamaka. - In: Emannuel, S. (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, 214-222. Psillos, S. ( 1996). On Van Fraassen’s Critique ofAbductive Reasoning. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 46 (182), 31-47. Psillos, S. (2002). Simply the Best. A Case for Abduction. - In: Kakas, A. and Sadri. F. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Essays in honour of Robert A. Kowalski. Part II. Berlin: Springer, 605-625. Pust, J. (2013). Skepticism, Reason and Reidianism. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205-225. Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and Reference. - In: Journal of Philosophy, 70 (19), 699-711. Quine, W. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. Rabin, G. (2018). Toward a Theory of Concept Mastery: The Recognition View. - In: Erkenntnis (Accepted in January, 2018), 1-22. Rawls, J. (1971 (2005). A Theory of Justice (Original Edition). Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1974-1975). The Independence of Moral Theory. - In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 5-22. Ross, D. (2002 (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ruffino, Μ. (2016). Superficially and Deeply Contingent A Priori Truths. - In: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (47), 247-266. Russell, B. (2014). A Priori justification and knowledge. - In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/ (26.08.2019) Russell, G. (2008). Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinc tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sawyer, S. (2003). Conceptual errors and social extemalism. - In: Philosophical Quarterly, 53 (211), 265-273. Sawyer, S. (2019). Concepts, conceptions and self-knowledge. - In: Erkenntnis. ISSN 01650106. Scanlon, T.M. (2014). Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schroeter, F. (2004). Reflective Equilibrium and Antitheory. - In: Nous, 38 (1), 110-134. Smart, J. (1959). Sensations and Brain Processes. - In: Philosophical Review, 68,141-156. 218
Smith, N. (2012). Logic. The laws of truth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Sosa, E. (1980). The Raft and the Pyramid. Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge. ֊ In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1), 3-26. Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sosa, E. (2013). Intuitions and foundations. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 186-202. Stein, E. (2005). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as an Answer to an Objection to Moral Heu ristics. - In: Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 28 (4), 561-562. Stratton-Lake, P. (2016). Intuition, Self-Evidence and Understanding. - In: Shafer-Landau, R. (ed.). Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value. ֊ In: Philosophical Studies, 127 (1), 109-166. Thurow, J. (2013). The Implicit Conception and Intuition Theory of the A Priori, with Implications for Experimental Philosophy. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67-91. Turri, J. (2018). The non-factive turn in epistemology: some hypotheses. - In: Mitova, V. (ed.). The factive turn in epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219-228. Vahid, H. (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Walden, K. (2013). In Defense of Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Philosophical Studies, 166 (2), 243-256. Wedgewood, R. (2013). Apriori Bootstrapping. ֊ In: The Apriori in Philosophy, 226-246. Weinberg, J. (2013). The
Prospects for an Experimentalist Rationalism, or Why It’s OK if the A Priori Is Only 99.44 Percent Empirically Pure. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. (eds.). The APriority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-108. Wikforss, A. (2001). Social externalism and conceptual errors. ֊ In: The Philosophical Quar terly, 51 (203), 217-231. Wikforss, A. (2004). Externalism and incomplete understanding. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 54 (215), 287-294. Williamson, T. (2006). Conceptual truth. - In: The Aristotelian society supplementary volume, 80 (1), 1-41. Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Williamson, T. (2013). How Deep is the Distinction between A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge? - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291-312. Williamson, T. (2016). Abductive Philosophy. ֊ In: Philosophical Forum, 47 (3-4), 263-280. Wittgenstein, L. (1958 (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Xu, Z. (2016). Williamson’s Challenges to the A Priori - A Posteriori Distinction. - In: Philosophical Forum, 47 (3^1), 309-324. Zalta, E. (2019). Unifying Three Notions of Concepts. Theoria (Special issue), 1-20. Zhou, G. (2012). On the Embodiment of Economy Principle in the English Language. - In: English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (2), 100-104. 219
|
| adam_txt |
Съдържание Благодарности . 9 Встъпителни бележки. 11 Увод
. 15 ГЛАВА ПЪРВА РАЗГРАНИЧЕНИЕТО A PRIORI -A POSTERIORI. 21 1.1. Класическата концепция за a priori
. 23 1.1.1. Какво може и какво не може да бъде априорно.24 1.1.2. Аналитични и концептуални истини. . 26 1.1.3. Необходимост и
априорност. 32 1.1.4. Негативна и позитивна концепция.36 1.1.5. Аргумент срещу класическото разграничение. 37
1.1.6. Мотивация за запазване на концепцията . 48 1.2. Новото a priori .53 1.2.1. Аргіогі-
та. 54 1.2.2. Контингентност на априорните твърдения. 60
1.2.3. Фалсифицируемост на априорните твърдения. 64 1.2.4. Опит и априорност . 66 1.2.5. Процеси и способности. 72 1.2.6. Ролята на разбирането в новата концепция . 75 1.2.7. Функция на новата концепция. 79
ГЛАВА ВТОРА СТОЙНОСТТА НА ИНТУИЦИИТЕ . 83 2.1. Интуиции и нагледи. 85 2.1.1. Интуицията като концептуална
компетентност. 89 2.1.2. Интуиции и самоочевидни твърдения. 91 2.1.3. Дефиниране на интуиция.95 2.1.4. Сурови интуиции
(brute intuitions). 99 2.2. Евиденциален статус на интуициите . 102 2.2.1. Претенции срещу липсата на надеждност. 103 2.2.2.
Специфичен неемпиричен евиденциален статус. 107 2.2.3. Добри и лоши интуиции.ПО 2.2.4. Аргументът от липса на
знание. 112 ГЛАВА ТРЕТА ОБОСНОВАВАНЕ БЕЗ ИНТУИЦИИ ПО ФИЛОСОФСКИ . 115 3.1. Философско познание и абдукция.119 3.1.1.
Характеристики на абдуктивните изводи. 121 3.1.2. Проблеми пред извода към най-доброто обяснение. 125 3.1.3.
Прецизиране на абдуктивните допускания и формулиране на критерии за изводимост.128 3.2. Мисловно равновесие (МР) . 133 3.2.1. Какво представлява мисловното равновесие. 134 3.2.2. Обмислени съждения. 144 3.2.2.1. Как да дефинираме обмислените съждения. 145 3.2.2.2. Какво прави моралните съждения специални.147 3.2.2.3. Ограниченията върху обмислените съждения. 152 3.2.3. Актуално равновесие. 156 3.3. Изводи към дебата екстернализъм срещу интернализъм по отношение на обосноваването. 165 6
ГЛАВА ЧЕТВЪРТА МЕНТАЛНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ . 167 4.1. Какво се разбира под „ментално съдържание“. 169 4.1.1. Езикови изрази и техните ментални
еквиваленти.171 4.1.2. Представяне на менталното съдържание посредством „че“ клаузи.172 4.1.3. Позиции по отношение на менталното съдържание . 174 4.2. Притежаване на концепти и концептуални
истини.179 4.2.1. Концептуално владеене . 180 4.2.2. Перфектни говорители . 183 4.2.3. Импликации
от приемането на перфектни говорители. 187 4.2.4. Импликации от отказа от перфектни говорители. 190 4.3. Функционални теории за концепциите. 194 4.3.1. Перцептивни
(сензорно-моторни) и концептуални примитиви. 195 4.3.2. Аналогията между функция на употребата в езика и функция на концептуалната употреба. 197 4.3.3. Функция на системата срещу функция на концепта. 200 4.3.4.
Интернализъм, функционализъм, субективизъм .201 4.4. Натурализация на екстернализма по отношение на менталното
съдържание.203 4.4.1. Социален екстернализъм и широк физически екстернализъм. 204 4.4.2. Натурализация на екстернализма. 205 ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ . 207 БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ . 211 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 1. ПРЕВОДИ HA ПОНЯТИЯ . 220 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 2. ИЗПОЛЗВАНИ АБРЕВИАТУРИ . 222 7
БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ Ангелова, M. (2018). Съвременни проблеми около понятието за a priori ֊ случаят Уилямсън. - В: Харизанова, О. (съст.). Докторантски четения. Т.1. София: Универ ситетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“, 43-52. Ангелова-Елчинова, Μ. (2020). Прецизиране на абдуктивните допускания и
формули ране на критерии за изводимост. - В: Елчинов, Д. (съст.). Пътища на познанието. София: Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“. Бакалова, Μ. (2012). Знаем ли нещо за външния свят? София: Звезди. Бачев, Μ. (2016). Религията между разума и чувствата: Имануел Кант и Рудолф Ото.
NotaBene, 32. https://notabene-bg.org/read.php?id=379 (20.12.2019) Василев, С. (1978). Интуиция и творчество. София: БАН. Гаврилов, А. (1975). Към въпроса за природата на съзнанието. София: Софийски уни верситет „Климент Охридски“. Гурова, Л. (2018). Куайн за диспозиционните обяснения като белег за
незряла наука и една алтернативна гледна точка. - Във: Философски алтернативи, 6, 20-29. Гурова, Л. (2019). Обяснение, разбиране и извод. София: Нов български университет. Иванов, Д. (2015). Теории за истината. София: Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“. Иванова, А. (2020). Да вярваш
рационално. Велико Търново: ИТИ. Илиев, А. (1932). Художествено и научно творчество. София: Просвета, 155-162. Йорданов, П. (1943). Литературата като познание. - Във: Философски преглед, XV (2), 118-137. Казанджиев, С. (1982). Истина и очевидност. - В: Бъчваров, Μ., Димитрова, Н. (съст.) Спиридон
Казанджиев. Философски и психологически съчинения. София: Наука и изкуство, 74-192. Кант, И. (2013). Критика на
чистия разум. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“. Карагеоргиева, А. (2013). Увод в съвременната теория на познанието. София: Проектория. Ковачев, В. (1987). Теоретичното познание ֊ методологически проблеми. София: Наука и изкуство. 211
Куайн, У. (2008). Две догми на емпиризма. - В: Полименов, Т., Латинов, Е., Бешкова, А., Моллов, Б. (съст.) Философия на логиката II. София: Изток-Запад, 88-110. Кулов, В. (2011). Препрочитайки Димитър Михалчев. - В: Български философски преглед, кн. 1,15-38. Кулов, В. (2013). Философията като
проблем в българската книжнина на XX век. Со фия: ИБФК. Михалчев, Д. (1914). Форма и отношение. София: Софийски университет. Михалчев, Д. (1981). Избрани съчинения (съст. К. Дарковски). София: Наука и изку ство. Нечев, К. (2013). Рецепции и употреби на Ницшевите идеи в творчеството на Янко Янев. -
В: Известия. Т. XIII, 71-85. Николов, Б. (2015). Кратка история нааприорността. -В: NotaBene, 30. http://notabenebg.org/read.php?id=352 (20.12.2019) Павлов, T. (1942). Съвременни философски учения. София: „Д. Гологановъ“. Павлов, Т. (1945). Теория на отражението. София: Нариздат. Пеев, Д. (2019).
Мястото на интелекта в теориите за съзнанието от по-висок ред (ТСПР). - Във: Философия, 28 (3), 295-303. Сивилов, Л. (1980). Системното познание. София: Наука и изкуство. Спасов, Д. (1969). Анализ на познанието. София: Наука и изкуство. Цацов, Д. (2008). Шест десетилетия дискусии за епистемологията.
- В: Проданов, В., Владимиров, Л. (съст.). Шест десетилетия академична философия. София: ИФИБАН, 89-111. Янев, Я. (1925). Философията на Бергсон. ֊ В: Златорог, 8/9,350-360. Alexander, J. Weinberg, J. (2014). The ‘Unreliability’ of Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Machery, E. O’Neill, E. (eds.). Current
Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge, 128-145. Alston, W. (1993). The reliability of sense
perception. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Altehenger, H., Gaus, S. Menges, A. L. (2015). Being Realistic about Reflective Equilib rium. - In: Analysis, 75 (3), 514-522. Atkins, R. (2016). Pierce and the Conduct of Life. Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Re ligion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Armstrong, D. Μ. (1981). What is Consciousness? - In: The Nature of Mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 55-67. Arras, J. (2007). The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. - In: Bon nie Steinbock (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 46-71. Arvan, Μ. (2013). Groundwork for a New Moral Epistemology. Klesis, 27, 155-190. Audi, R. (1998). Moderate Intuiționism and the Epistemology of Moral Judgment. - In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1(1), 15^14. 212
Audi, R. (1999). Self-Evidence. ֊ In: Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (sl3), 205-228. Audi, R. (2009). The Good in the Right. A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Ayer, A. (1946). Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications. Baderin, A. (2017). Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Social Theory and Practice, 43(1), 1-28. Bates, J. (2005). The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Dialectica, 59 (3), 347-356. Dealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. - In: DePaul, Μ. Ramsey, W. (eds.). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Maryland: Rowman Littlefield, 201-240. Dealer, G. (1999). The A Priori. - In: Greco and Sosa (eds.). The Blackwell Guide to Episte mology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 243-270. Bedke, Μ. (2008). Ethical Intuitions: What They Are, What They Are Not, and How They Justify. American Philosophical Quarterly, 45 (3), 253-270. Bedke, Μ. (2019). Moral Intuition. - In: Zimmerman, A., Jones, K., Timmons, Μ. The Root ledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology, 360-374. Blackford, R. (2006). Stem Cell Research on Other Worlds, or Why Embryos Do Not Have a Right to Life. - In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 177-180. Boghossian, P. (1996). Analyticity Reconsidered. - In: Nous, 30 (3), 360-391. Boghossian, P. (1997). Analyticity. - In: Hale, B. and Wright, C. (eds.). Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell, 331-368. Boghossian, P. Peacocke, C. (2000). Introduction. - In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C.
(eds.). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-10. BonJour, L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. A Rationalist Account of A priori Justifica tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BonJour, L. (2003). A version of internalist foundationism. - In: Sosa, E. (ed.). Epistemic Justification. Internalism VS Externalism. Foundationism VS Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell, 3-96. Boyd, K. Nagel, J. (2014). The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Machery, E. O’Neill, E. (eds.). - In: Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge, 109-127. Brandt, R. (1990). The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Ethics, 100(2), 295-278. Brink, D. (2014). Principles and Intuitions in Ethics. Historical and Contemporary Perspec tives. Ethics, 124,1-30. Buckwaiter, W. Stephen, S. (2014). Gender and Philosophical Intuition. - In: Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (eds.). Experimental Philosophy. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 307-346. Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. - In: Midwest studies in philosophy, 4 (1), 73-121. 213
Burge, T. (1986). Intellectual norms and foundations of mind. - In: Journal of Philosophy, 83, 697-720. Burge, T. (1993). Content Preservation. - In: The Philosophical Review, 102 (4), 457-488. Burge, T. (1997). Interlocution, Perception and Memory. - In: Philosophical Studies, 86 (1), 21^17. Burge, T. (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67 (3), 503-548. Butchvarov, P. (1970). The Concept of Knowledge. Evanston: Northern University Press. Butchvarov, P. (1989). Scepticism in Ethics. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press. Butchvarov, P. (1998). Skepticism about the External World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Butchvarov, P. (2015). Anthropocentrism in Philosophy. Realism, Antirealism, Semirealism. Berlin: De Gruyter. Campbell, R. (2007). What is Moral Judgment? - In: Journal of Philosophy, 104 (7), 321֊ 349. Campos, D. (2011). On the Distinction Between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation. - In: Synthese, 180,419^142. Cao, J. (2006). A Critique to the Significance of Gettier Counter-Examples. ֊ In: Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 1 (4), 675-687. Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carbon, C. (2014). Understanding Human Perception by Human-made Illusions. - In: Fron tiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (Article 566), 1-6. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carter, W. (1976). On A Priori Contingent Truths. - In: Analysis, 36 (2), 105-106 Daniels, N. (1979). Casullo, A. (2001). Experience and A Priori
Justification (Review). - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63 (3), 665-671. Casullo, A. (2003). A Priori Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Casullo, A. (2013). Articulating the A priori - A posteriori Distinction. - In: Casullo, A. Thurow, J. (eds.). The APriori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 249-273. Casullo, A. (2015). Four Challenges to the A Priori-A Posteriori Distinction. - In: Synthese, 192 (9), 2701-2724. Cummins, R. (1998). Reflection on Reflective Equilibrium. - In: DePaul, Μ. Ramsey, W. (eds.). Rethinking Intuition. Rowman Littlefield. 113-128. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. - In: The Journal of Philosophy, 76 (5), 256-282. Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. Day, T. Kincaid, H. (1994). Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place. - In: Synthese, 98,271-295. Delisen, F. (2017). Abductively robust inference. ֊ In: Analysis, 77 (1), 20-29. 214
De Maagt, S. (2017). Reflective Equilibrium and Moral Objectivity? ֊ In: Inquiry: An Inter disciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 60 (5), 443^165. DePaul, Μ. (2005). Reflective Equilibrium. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Encyclopedia, com. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcriptsandmaps/reflective-equilibrium (30.11.2018) Douglas, K., Sutton, R. Cichocka, A. (2019). The Social Psychology of Gullibility. Routledge. Dretske, F. (1997). Naturalising the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. Dummett, Μ. (1996). The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Eggleston, B. (2010). Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think about Morality. - In: Mind, 119 (475), 549-584. Elgin, C. (1996). Considered Judgments. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Elliott, E. (2017). Ramsey without ethical neutrality. - In: Mind, 126 (501), 1-52. Evans, G. (1979). Reference and Contingency. - In: The Monist, 62, 161-189. Enoch, D. (2011). Taking Morality Seriously: a Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. Frankena, W. (1939). The Naturalistic Fallacy. - In: Mind, 48 (192), 464^177. Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? - In: Analysis, 23 (6), 121-123. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral Intuitions. Fast and Frugal Heuristics? - In: Sinnott-Arm strong, W. (ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science of Morality - Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1-26. Glazier, Μ. (2017). The Difference between Epistemic and Metaphysical Necessity. - In: Synthese, 1-16. Glock, H. Kaihat, J. (2018). Linguistic Turn. -
In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/linguistic-turn/v-l Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goldman, A. (2013). Philosophical Naturalism and Intuitional Metodology. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 11^14. Greene, J. (2007). The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul. - In: Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 3,36-79. Greene, J. (2016). Solving the Trolley Problem. ֊ In: Sytsma, J. and Buckwaiter, W. (eds.). A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Grozdanoff, B. (2014). A Priori Revisability in Science. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: Asocial Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. - In: Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. Hales, S. (2012). The Faculty of Intuition. - In: Analytic Philosophy, 53 (2), 180-207. Hare, R. Μ. (1973). Rawls’s Theory of Justice. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 23 (91), 144-155. 215
Harman, G. (1965). The Inference to the Best Explanation. - In: Philosophical Review, 74 (1), 88-95. Haslett, D. W. (1987). What is Wrong with Reflective Equilibrium? - In: Philosophical Quarterly, 37 (148), 305-311. Harman, G. (1982). Conceptual Role Semantics. - In: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23 (2), 242-256. Hart, J. Graether, Μ. (2018). Something’s Going on Here: Psychological Predictors of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. - In: Journal of Individual Differences, 39(4), 229-237. Hawthorne, J. (2002). Deeply Contingent A Priori Knowledge. - In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LXV (2), 247-269. Hawthorne, J. (2007). Externalism and the Apriori. - In: Goldberg, S. (ed.). Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201-218. Henderson, D. Horgan, T. (2001). The A Priori isn’t All it is Cracked out to Be, but it is Something. - In: Philosophical Topics, 29 (1/2), 219-250. Henderson, D. Horgan, T. (2013). On the Armchair Justification of Conceptually Grounded Necessary Truths. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 111-133. Hill, C. (2013). Concepts, Teleology and Rational Revision. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The Apriori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 134-157. Hill, C. (2010). I love Machery’s book, but love concepts more. - In: Philosophical Studies, 149 (3). 411-421. Hopp, W. (2009). Husserl, Dummett and the Linguistic Turn. - In: Grazer Philosophische Studien, 78 (1), 17^-0. Ichikawa, J. (2013). Experimental
Philosophy and the Apriority. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). - In: The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 45-66. Jabr, F. (2012). How Brainless Slime Mold Redefine Intelligence. - In: Nature. https://doi. org/10.1038/nature.2012.11811 (22.10.2022) Jenkins, C. A. (2008). Grounding Concepts: An Empirical Basis for Arithmetical Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenkins, C. S. I. (2013). Naturalistic Challenges to the A Priori. - In: Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.). The A priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 274—290. Kelly, T. McGrath, S. (2010). Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough? - In: Philosophical Per spectives, 24 (1), 325-359. Kitcher, P. (1980). Apriority and Necessity. - In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58 (2), 89-101. Knobe, J. Nichols, S. (2008). An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto. - In: Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 3-16. Kobes, B. (2010). Burge’s Dualism 1. - In: Koons, R. Dealer, G. (eds.). The Waning of Materialism. Oxford University Press, 215-232. Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. 216
Kuipers, T. (1992). Naive and Refined Truth Approximation. Synthese 93 (3), 299-341. Ladyman, J., Douven, L, Horsten, L., Van Fraassen, В. (1997). A Defense of van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Inference: A Reply to Psillos. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (188), 305-321. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge. Little, D. (1984). Reflective Equilibrium and Justification. - In: Southern Journal of Philosophy, 22 (3), 373-387. Lobanovska, Μ. Pilla, G. (2017). Penicillin’s Discovery and Antibiotic Resistance: Les sons for the Future? - In: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 90, 135—145. Lupyan, G. (2017). How Reliable Is Perception? - In: Philosophical Topics, 45(1), 81-106. Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. Stich, S. (2004). Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style. Cognition, 92(3), 1-12. Maddy, P. (2000). Naturalism and the A Priori. - In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds.). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 92-116. Malmgren, A. (2013). A Priori Testimony Revisited. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 158-185. Mitova, V. (2017). Believable Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moore, G. E. (1942). A Reply to My Critics. - In: Schlipp, P. (ed.). The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 533-677. Moser, P. (1987). Introduction. - In: Moser, P. (ed.). A Priori Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mormman, T. (2012). Toward a Theory of the Pragmatic A Priori. From Carnap to Lewis and Beyond. - In: Rudolf Carnap and the
Legacy of Logical Empiricism, 16, 113-132. Nagel, J. (2007). Epistemic Intuitions. - In: Philosophy Compass, 2 (6), 792-819. Nichols, P. (2012). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method of Justification in Bioethics. In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33 (5), 325-341. Niiniluoto, I. (2014). Representation and Truth Likeness. ֊ In: Foundations of Science, 19 (4), 375-379. Nielsen, K. (1982). Considered Judgments Again. - In: Human Studies, 5 (1), 109-118. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Pancheri, L. (1971). James, Lewis and the Pragmatic A Priori. ֊ In: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7 (3), 135-114. Papineau, D. (2015). Naturalism. - In: Zalta, E. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/ (22.12.2019) Pavlov, T. (1973). On Truths and the Truth. - In: Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 1. Sofia: Sofia Press, 99-104. Peacocke, C. (2001). Does Perception have a Nonconceptual Content? - In: Journal of Phi losophy, 98 (5), 239-264. Peirce, C. S. [CP] (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Hartshorne, C., Weiss P. and Burks, A., eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 217
Plantinga, A. (1996). Respondeo. - In: (Kvanvig, J. Ed.). Warrant in contemporary episte mology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 307-378. Pollock, J. ( 1999). The Gettier Problem. - In: Crumley II, J. (ed.). Readings in Epistemology. London:Mayfield Publishing Company. Popovic, N. (2015). Why Truth is not a Necessary Condition for Knowledge. ֊ In: The Philosophical Forum, 46 (4), 397-401. Prichard, H. A. (1950). Knowledge and Perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Priest, G. (1989). Dialectic and Dialetheic. Science Society, 53 (4), 388—415. Priest, G. (2013). Between the Homs of Idealism and Realism. The Middle Way of Madhyamaka. - In: Emannuel, S. (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, 214-222. Psillos, S. ( 1996). On Van Fraassen’s Critique ofAbductive Reasoning. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 46 (182), 31-47. Psillos, S. (2002). Simply the Best. A Case for Abduction. - In: Kakas, A. and Sadri. F. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Essays in honour of Robert A. Kowalski. Part II. Berlin: Springer, 605-625. Pust, J. (2013). Skepticism, Reason and Reidianism. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205-225. Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and Reference. - In: Journal of Philosophy, 70 (19), 699-711. Quine, W. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. Rabin, G. (2018). Toward a Theory of Concept Mastery: The Recognition View. - In: Erkenntnis (Accepted in January, 2018), 1-22. Rawls, J. (1971 (2005). A Theory of Justice (Original Edition). Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1974-1975). The Independence of Moral Theory. - In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 5-22. Ross, D. (2002 (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ruffino, Μ. (2016). Superficially and Deeply Contingent A Priori Truths. - In: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (47), 247-266. Russell, B. (2014). A Priori justification and knowledge. - In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/ (26.08.2019) Russell, G. (2008). Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinc tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sawyer, S. (2003). Conceptual errors and social extemalism. - In: Philosophical Quarterly, 53 (211), 265-273. Sawyer, S. (2019). Concepts, conceptions and self-knowledge. - In: Erkenntnis. ISSN 01650106. Scanlon, T.M. (2014). Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schroeter, F. (2004). Reflective Equilibrium and Antitheory. - In: Nous, 38 (1), 110-134. Smart, J. (1959). Sensations and Brain Processes. - In: Philosophical Review, 68,141-156. 218
Smith, N. (2012). Logic. The laws of truth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Sosa, E. (1980). The Raft and the Pyramid. Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge. ֊ In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1), 3-26. Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sosa, E. (2013). Intuitions and foundations. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 186-202. Stein, E. (2005). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as an Answer to an Objection to Moral Heu ristics. - In: Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 28 (4), 561-562. Stratton-Lake, P. (2016). Intuition, Self-Evidence and Understanding. - In: Shafer-Landau, R. (ed.). Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value. ֊ In: Philosophical Studies, 127 (1), 109-166. Thurow, J. (2013). The Implicit Conception and Intuition Theory of the A Priori, with Implications for Experimental Philosophy. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67-91. Turri, J. (2018). The non-factive turn in epistemology: some hypotheses. - In: Mitova, V. (ed.). The factive turn in epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219-228. Vahid, H. (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Walden, K. (2013). In Defense of Reflective Equilibrium. - In: Philosophical Studies, 166 (2), 243-256. Wedgewood, R. (2013). Apriori Bootstrapping. ֊ In: The Apriori in Philosophy, 226-246. Weinberg, J. (2013). The
Prospects for an Experimentalist Rationalism, or Why It’s OK if the A Priori Is Only 99.44 Percent Empirically Pure. - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. (eds.). The APriority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-108. Wikforss, A. (2001). Social externalism and conceptual errors. ֊ In: The Philosophical Quar terly, 51 (203), 217-231. Wikforss, A. (2004). Externalism and incomplete understanding. - In: The Philosophical Quarterly, 54 (215), 287-294. Williamson, T. (2006). Conceptual truth. - In: The Aristotelian society supplementary volume, 80 (1), 1-41. Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Williamson, T. (2013). How Deep is the Distinction between A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge? - In: Casullo, A., Thurow, J. The A Priority in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291-312. Williamson, T. (2016). Abductive Philosophy. ֊ In: Philosophical Forum, 47 (3-4), 263-280. Wittgenstein, L. (1958 (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Xu, Z. (2016). Williamson’s Challenges to the A Priori - A Posteriori Distinction. - In: Philosophical Forum, 47 (3^1), 309-324. Zalta, E. (2019). Unifying Three Notions of Concepts. Theoria (Special issue), 1-20. Zhou, G. (2012). On the Embodiment of Economy Principle in the English Language. - In: English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (2), 100-104. 219 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen 1997- |
| author2 | Ljuckanov, Rosen 1979- |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | r l rl |
| author_facet | Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen 1997- Ljuckanov, Rosen 1979- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen 1997- |
| author_variant | m a e mae |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048970402 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1392146640 (DE-599)BVBBV048970402 |
| edition | Părvo izdanie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02482nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048970402</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230913 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230523s2022 bu |||| 00||| bul d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789540756172</subfield><subfield code="9">978-954-07-5617-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1392146640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048970402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bul</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bu</subfield><subfield code="c">BG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-01</subfield><subfield code="a">Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen</subfield><subfield code="d">1997-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">880-03</subfield><subfield code="a">Otvătre navăn</subfield><subfield code="b">a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene</subfield><subfield code="c">Madlen Angelova-Elčinova</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-02</subfield><subfield code="a">Părvo izdanie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">880-04</subfield><subfield code="a">Sofija</subfield><subfield code="b">Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ochridski"</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">222 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 211-219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text bulgarisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Kyrillisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intuition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027532-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intuition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027532-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ljuckanov, Rosen</subfield><subfield code="d">1979-</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">100-01/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Ангелова-Елчинова, Мадлен</subfield><subfield code="a">ut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="6">250-02/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Първо издание</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">245-03/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Отвътре навън</subfield><subfield code="b">a priori обосноваване, интуиции и концептуално владеене</subfield><subfield code="c">Мадлен Ангелова-Елчинова</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">264-04/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">София</subfield><subfield code="b">Университетско издателство "Св. Климент Охридски"</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">sla</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034234021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">499</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048970402 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:02:43Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:51:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789540756172 |
| language | Bulgarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034234021 |
| oclc_num | 1392146640 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 222 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20230913 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ochridski" |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | 880-01 Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen 1997- Verfasser aut 880-03 Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene Madlen Angelova-Elčinova 880-02 Părvo izdanie 880-04 Sofija Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ochridski" 2022 222 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverzeichnis Seite 211-219 Text bulgarisch Kyrillisch Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd rswk-swf Intuition (DE-588)4027532-2 gnd rswk-swf Intuition (DE-588)4027532-2 s Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 s DE-604 Ljuckanov, Rosen 1979- edt Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis 100-01/(N Ангелова-Елчинова, Мадлен ut 250-02/(N Първо издание 245-03/(N Отвътре навън a priori обосноваване, интуиции и концептуално владеене Мадлен Ангелова-Елчинова 264-04/(N София Университетско издателство "Св. Климент Охридски" 2022 |
| spellingShingle | Angelova-Elčinova, Madlen 1997- Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Intuition (DE-588)4027532-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4070914-0 (DE-588)4027532-2 |
| title | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| title_auth | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| title_exact_search | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| title_full | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene Madlen Angelova-Elčinova |
| title_fullStr | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene Madlen Angelova-Elčinova |
| title_full_unstemmed | Otvătre navăn a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene Madlen Angelova-Elčinova |
| title_short | Otvătre navăn |
| title_sort | otvatre navan a priori obosnovavane intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| title_sub | a priori obosnovavane, intuicii i konceptualno vladeene |
| topic | Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Intuition (DE-588)4027532-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Erkenntnistheorie Intuition |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034234021&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT angelovaelcinovamadlen otvatrenavanaprioriobosnovavaneintuiciiikonceptualnovladeene AT ljuckanovrosen otvatrenavanaprioriobosnovavaneintuiciiikonceptualnovladeene |