Artistic (counter) speech:
Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[2022]
|
| Subjects: | |
| Summary: | Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship to handle art-based hate speech, this article proposes aesthetic blocking and aesthetic spotlighting. I then show that under certain conditions, this can lead to eventual metaphysical destruction of the artwork; a way to destroy harmful art without physically destroying it. |
| ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048857358 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230322 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 230313s2022 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1373390376 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048857358 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dixon, Daisy |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Artistic (counter) speech |c Daisy Dixon |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2022] | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship to handle art-based hate speech, this article proposes aesthetic blocking and aesthetic spotlighting. I then show that under certain conditions, this can lead to eventual metaphysical destruction of the artwork; a way to destroy harmful art without physically destroying it. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zerstörung |0 (DE-588)4222882-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Illokutiver Akt |0 (DE-588)4122213-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstwerk |0 (DE-588)4123592-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Illokutiver Akt |0 (DE-588)4122213-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kunstwerk |0 (DE-588)4123592-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Zerstörung |0 (DE-588)4222882-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g number:4 |g year:2022 |g pages:409-419 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2022 |g Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 409-419 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
| 941 | |b 80 |h 4 |j 2022 |s 409-419 | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034122531 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1829485144416714752 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
| author | Dixon, Daisy |
| author_facet | Dixon, Daisy |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dixon, Daisy |
| author_variant | d d dd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048857358 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1373390376 (DE-599)BVBBV048857358 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000naa a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048857358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230322</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230313s2022 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1373390376</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048857358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dixon, Daisy</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Artistic (counter) speech</subfield><subfield code="c">Daisy Dixon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship to handle art-based hate speech, this article proposes aesthetic blocking and aesthetic spotlighting. I then show that under certain conditions, this can lead to eventual metaphysical destruction of the artwork; a way to destroy harmful art without physically destroying it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zerstörung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222882-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Illokutiver Akt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122213-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstwerk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123592-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Illokutiver Akt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122213-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kunstwerk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123592-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Zerstörung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222882-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:409-419</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 409-419</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">80</subfield><subfield code="h">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="s">409-419</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034122531</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048857358 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:41:23Z |
| indexdate | 2025-04-15T16:03:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0021-8529 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034122531 |
| oclc_num | 1373390376 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Dixon, Daisy Verfasser aut Artistic (counter) speech Daisy Dixon [2022] txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship to handle art-based hate speech, this article proposes aesthetic blocking and aesthetic spotlighting. I then show that under certain conditions, this can lead to eventual metaphysical destruction of the artwork; a way to destroy harmful art without physically destroying it. Zerstörung (DE-588)4222882-7 gnd rswk-swf Illokutiver Akt (DE-588)4122213-1 gnd rswk-swf Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s Illokutiver Akt (DE-588)4122213-1 s Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 s Zerstörung (DE-588)4222882-7 s DE-604 volume:80 number:4 year:2022 pages:409-419 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2022 Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 409-419 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
| spellingShingle | Dixon, Daisy Artistic (counter) speech Zerstörung (DE-588)4222882-7 gnd Illokutiver Akt (DE-588)4122213-1 gnd Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4222882-7 (DE-588)4122213-1 (DE-588)4123592-7 (DE-588)4000626-8 |
| title | Artistic (counter) speech |
| title_auth | Artistic (counter) speech |
| title_exact_search | Artistic (counter) speech |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Artistic (counter) speech |
| title_full | Artistic (counter) speech Daisy Dixon |
| title_fullStr | Artistic (counter) speech Daisy Dixon |
| title_full_unstemmed | Artistic (counter) speech Daisy Dixon |
| title_short | Artistic (counter) speech |
| title_sort | artistic counter speech |
| topic | Zerstörung (DE-588)4222882-7 gnd Illokutiver Akt (DE-588)4122213-1 gnd Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Zerstörung Illokutiver Akt Kunstwerk Ästhetik |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dixondaisy artisticcounterspeech |