"Oh, but this isn't architecture!": the paradoxical heritage of French public housing
At the end of the twentieth century, poor workmanship during construction and deferred maintenance called into question the future of subsidized housing in France. In 2001, the administration began to systematically demolish the decaying housing stock, some of which had been built by renowned modern...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | At the end of the twentieth century, poor workmanship during construction and deferred maintenance called into question the future of subsidized housing in France. In 2001, the administration began to systematically demolish the decaying housing stock, some of which had been built by renowned modernist architects. This chapter discusses a blind spot of French housing politics consisting of the fact that successive policies, even preceding demolition, dismissed the relation residents built to the places in which they lived. An examination of the debate within the administration and architectural profession over whether to preserve this type of housing, and analysis of recent renovations show that addressing the question of dwelling, as problematic as it may be, can help us understand the relevance and contribution of architecture to the housing question. Case studies include Lacaton & Vassal’s renovation of Tour du Bois-le-Prêtre, Paris (2009–2011), originally built by Lopez (1959–1961); bmc2’s intervention in Rouen Grand Mare (2005–2012), originally built in the 1960s; and Eliet and Lehmann’s restoration of the Faisanderie, Fontainebleau (2013–2015), originally built by Lods (1951–1952). |
Beschreibung: | Illustrationen |
ISBN: | 978-0-815-39602-4 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048839574 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230309 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 230301s2022 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1372482021 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048839574 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-255 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Parvu, Sandra |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)142232920 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" |b the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |c Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
300 | |b Illustrationen | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a At the end of the twentieth century, poor workmanship during construction and deferred maintenance called into question the future of subsidized housing in France. In 2001, the administration began to systematically demolish the decaying housing stock, some of which had been built by renowned modernist architects. This chapter discusses a blind spot of French housing politics consisting of the fact that successive policies, even preceding demolition, dismissed the relation residents built to the places in which they lived. An examination of the debate within the administration and architectural profession over whether to preserve this type of housing, and analysis of recent renovations show that addressing the question of dwelling, as problematic as it may be, can help us understand the relevance and contribution of architecture to the housing question. Case studies include Lacaton & Vassal’s renovation of Tour du Bois-le-Prêtre, Paris (2009–2011), originally built by Lopez (1959–1961); bmc2’s intervention in Rouen Grand Mare (2005–2012), originally built in the 1960s; and Eliet and Lehmann’s restoration of the Faisanderie, Fontainebleau (2013–2015), originally built by Lods (1951–1952). | |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1950-2020 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sozialer Wohnungsbau |0 (DE-588)4055754-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Sozialer Wohnungsbau |0 (DE-588)4055754-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte 1950-2020 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Sotgia, Alice |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)14289317X |4 aut | |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g pages:59-79 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |t Architecture and the housing question / edited by Can Bilsel and Juliana Maxim |d Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY, 2022 |g Seite 59-79 |k Routledge research in architecture |w (DE-604)BV048825355 |z 978-0-815-39602-4 |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034105024 | ||
941 | |s 59-79 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184949169848320 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
article_link | (DE-604)BV048825355 |
author | Parvu, Sandra Sotgia, Alice |
author_GND | (DE-588)142232920 (DE-588)14289317X |
author_facet | Parvu, Sandra Sotgia, Alice |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Parvu, Sandra |
author_variant | s p sp a s as |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048839574 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1372482021 (DE-599)BVBBV048839574 |
era | Geschichte 1950-2020 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 1950-2020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02639naa a2200385 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048839574</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230301s2022 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1372482021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048839574</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parvu, Sandra</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)142232920</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">"Oh, but this isn't architecture!"</subfield><subfield code="b">the paradoxical heritage of French public housing</subfield><subfield code="c">Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At the end of the twentieth century, poor workmanship during construction and deferred maintenance called into question the future of subsidized housing in France. In 2001, the administration began to systematically demolish the decaying housing stock, some of which had been built by renowned modernist architects. This chapter discusses a blind spot of French housing politics consisting of the fact that successive policies, even preceding demolition, dismissed the relation residents built to the places in which they lived. An examination of the debate within the administration and architectural profession over whether to preserve this type of housing, and analysis of recent renovations show that addressing the question of dwelling, as problematic as it may be, can help us understand the relevance and contribution of architecture to the housing question. Case studies include Lacaton & Vassal’s renovation of Tour du Bois-le-Prêtre, Paris (2009–2011), originally built by Lopez (1959–1961); bmc2’s intervention in Rouen Grand Mare (2005–2012), originally built in the 1960s; and Eliet and Lehmann’s restoration of the Faisanderie, Fontainebleau (2013–2015), originally built by Lods (1951–1952).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-2020</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sozialer Wohnungsbau</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055754-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sozialer Wohnungsbau</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055754-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-2020</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sotgia, Alice</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14289317X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">pages:59-79</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Architecture and the housing question / edited by Can Bilsel and Juliana Maxim</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Seite 59-79</subfield><subfield code="k">Routledge research in architecture</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV048825355</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-815-39602-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034105024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="s">59-79</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd |
geographic_facet | Frankreich |
id | DE-604.BV048839574 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T21:37:18Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:47:28Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 978-0-815-39602-4 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034105024 |
oclc_num | 1372482021 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-255 |
owner_facet | DE-255 |
physical | Illustrationen |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Parvu, Sandra Verfasser (DE-588)142232920 aut "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia 2022 Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier At the end of the twentieth century, poor workmanship during construction and deferred maintenance called into question the future of subsidized housing in France. In 2001, the administration began to systematically demolish the decaying housing stock, some of which had been built by renowned modernist architects. This chapter discusses a blind spot of French housing politics consisting of the fact that successive policies, even preceding demolition, dismissed the relation residents built to the places in which they lived. An examination of the debate within the administration and architectural profession over whether to preserve this type of housing, and analysis of recent renovations show that addressing the question of dwelling, as problematic as it may be, can help us understand the relevance and contribution of architecture to the housing question. Case studies include Lacaton & Vassal’s renovation of Tour du Bois-le-Prêtre, Paris (2009–2011), originally built by Lopez (1959–1961); bmc2’s intervention in Rouen Grand Mare (2005–2012), originally built in the 1960s; and Eliet and Lehmann’s restoration of the Faisanderie, Fontainebleau (2013–2015), originally built by Lods (1951–1952). Geschichte 1950-2020 gnd rswk-swf Sozialer Wohnungsbau (DE-588)4055754-6 gnd rswk-swf Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd rswk-swf Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 g Sozialer Wohnungsbau (DE-588)4055754-6 s Geschichte 1950-2020 z DE-604 Sotgia, Alice Verfasser (DE-588)14289317X aut pages:59-79 Architecture and the housing question / edited by Can Bilsel and Juliana Maxim Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY, 2022 Seite 59-79 Routledge research in architecture (DE-604)BV048825355 978-0-815-39602-4 |
spellingShingle | Parvu, Sandra Sotgia, Alice "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing Sozialer Wohnungsbau (DE-588)4055754-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4055754-6 (DE-588)4018145-5 |
title | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |
title_auth | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |
title_exact_search | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |
title_exact_search_txtP | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |
title_full | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia |
title_fullStr | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia |
title_full_unstemmed | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" the paradoxical heritage of French public housing Sandra Parvu and Alice Sotgia |
title_short | "Oh, but this isn't architecture!" |
title_sort | oh but this isn t architecture the paradoxical heritage of french public housing |
title_sub | the paradoxical heritage of French public housing |
topic | Sozialer Wohnungsbau (DE-588)4055754-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Sozialer Wohnungsbau Frankreich |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parvusandra ohbutthisisntarchitecturetheparadoxicalheritageoffrenchpublichousing AT sotgiaalice ohbutthisisntarchitecturetheparadoxicalheritageoffrenchpublichousing |