The European Parliament and delegated legislation: an institutional balance perspective
This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Pa...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Hart
2022
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Parliamentary Democracy in Europe
volume 8 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Parliament vis-à-vis both the European Commission and the Council. The book explores whether Parliament's formally reinforced role is reflected in the actual balance of powers in the area of delegated legislation and executive rule-making. It does so by assessing how both the law and practice of decision-making at the legislative level, looking at specific case studies, and the sub-legislative level, examining the scrutiny over delegated legislation, has crystallized in the ten years following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This rigorous study gives a fascinating insight into one of the most significant developments in European parliamentary law-making, which EU constitutional lawyers will find required reading |
| Beschreibung: | xiv, 213 Seiten Diagramme 244 mm |
| ISBN: | 9781509931859 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048643649 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230307 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 230111s2022 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781509931859 |c hbk |9 978-1-5099-3185-9 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9781509931859 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1371322636 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048643649 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-473 | ||
| 084 | |a MK 5110 |0 (DE-625)123070: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chamon, Merijn |d 1986- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1104271346 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The European Parliament and delegated legislation |b an institutional balance perspective |c Merijn Charmon |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Hart |c 2022 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2022 | |
| 300 | |a xiv, 213 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 244 mm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Parliamentary Democracy in Europe |v volume 8 | |
| 520 | |a This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Parliament vis-à-vis both the European Commission and the Council. The book explores whether Parliament's formally reinforced role is reflected in the actual balance of powers in the area of delegated legislation and executive rule-making. It does so by assessing how both the law and practice of decision-making at the legislative level, looking at specific case studies, and the sub-legislative level, examining the scrutiny over delegated legislation, has crystallized in the ten years following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This rigorous study gives a fascinating insight into one of the most significant developments in European parliamentary law-making, which EU constitutional lawyers will find required reading | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäisches Parlament |0 (DE-588)1051754-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh / LAW / International | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4071795-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4131720-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäisches Parlament |0 (DE-588)1051754-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetzgebungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4071795-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gesetzgebungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4131720-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 978-1-50993-187-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB |z 978-1-50993-186-6 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Parliamentary Democracy in Europe |v volume 8 |w (DE-604)BV043673779 |9 8 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034018524&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034018524 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184788263763968 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS Table of Cases............................................................................................................................................ ix List ofFigures............................................................................................................................................ xv List of Tables.......................................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 I. A Primer: Operationalising Institutional Balance as a Yardstick for Assessing Institutional Developments........................................................ 2 A. Devising an Institutional Balance Test............................................................ 8 B. Applying the Institutional Balance Test to Identify Constitutional Modifications 10 II. Structure of the Enquiry......................................................................................... 11 2. A Formal Reading of the Lisbon Treaty....................................................................... 12 I. The Formal Catalogue of Acts................................................................................ 12 II. The Lisbon Treaty’s ‘Atypical’ Acts.......................................................................... 13 III. The Distinction between Delegated and Implementing Acts: A Cursory Reading of the
TFEU........................................................................... 16 A. Key Features of Article 290 TFEU............................................................... 19 B. Key Features of Article 291 TFEU............................................................... 21 IV. Parliamentary Control Over Post-Lisbon Executive Acts.................................... 24 3. The Road Leading Up to the Lisbon Treaty..................................................................27 I. Comitology’s Origins and Original Sin.................................................................. 27 II. Judicial Sanctioning of Comitology and the Commission’s Broad Implementing Powers......................................................................... 30 III. From the Single European Act to the 2006 Revision of the Second Comitology Decision.............................................................................................. 32 A. Codification: The SEA and the First Comitology Decision.......................... 33 B. A Call for Parliamentarisation and the Second Comitology Decision.......34 C. The Constitution and the Amendment of the Second Comitology Decision..................................................................................... 37 IV. A Recalibrated Institutional Balance..................................................................... 41 4. The Exponential Multiplication of Delimitation Problems..................................... 44 I. Delimitation of Autonomous Executive Acts against (Delegated) Legislation and
Implementation...................................................................... 45 A. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Legislation................................................. 45 B. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Implementation.............................................48 C. Institutional Implications................................................................ 50
vi Contents II. III. Delimitation of Legislation and Delegation...........................................................50 Delimitation of Delegated and Implementing Acts.............................................. 53 A. Judicial Clarifications in Biocides, Eures Network and Visa Reciprocity..... 57 B. Amendments as Implementation................................................................... 61 C. The PRAC, a Zombie in EU Law................................................................... 62 D. The 2019 Inter-Institutional Agreement....................................................... 65 E. Legislative Practice in Light of the 2019 ILA................................................. 71 5. Delegated Power: Further Limits and Procedure....................................................... 75 I. The Passive Personal Scope of Article 290 TFEU...................................................76 II. Breaking Down the Specificity Requirement......................................................... 79 A. Duration and Objectives................................................................................. 80 B. Content and Scope........................................................................................... 81 III. Testing Specificity in Practice................................................................................... 84 IV. Procedural Limits to the Exercise of Delegated Powers........................................ 88 A. The Drafting of Delegated Acts...................................................................... 91 B. The Control
Exercised by the Legislator: Objection and Revocation.......100 6. Implementing Power: Triggering Factors, Nature, Extent and Procedure.......... Ill I. The Notion of Uniform Conditions....................................................................... 112 II. Reconceptualising Implementing Powers Post-Lisbon...................................... 117 A. May Implementing Acts Implement Delegated Acts?................................117 B. The Nature and Extent of Implementing Powers under Article 291 TFEU................................................................................... 122 C. The Eures Network Standard as the Single Standard for Implementation............................................................................... 127 D. The Institutions’ Constitutional Modification of Article 291 (2) TFEU.... 128 III. Exceptional Implementation by the Council...................................................... 129 A. CFSP Implementation by the Council......................................................... 130 B. Duly Justified Specific Cases of Implementation by the Council............. 131 C. Implementation by the European Council.................................................. 138 IV. The (not so) Closed List of Implementing actors and Implementing Acts........ 140 A. EU Agencies..................................................................................................... 140 B. Sui Generis Implementing Acts.................................................................... 149 V. The Comitology
Procedures.................................................................................... 151 A. The Proposal for and Negotiations on the Comitology Regulation......... 152 B. The Comitology Regulation........................................................................... 154 C. The Functioning of the Post-Lisbon Comitology Regime........................ 166 D. The European Parliament’s Droit de Regard............................................... 170 VI. No Self-Love, the 2017 Proposal to Amend theComitology Regulation............ 174 7. The Practice and Politics of Delegated Legislation.................................................... 180 I. Strategies in Delegating Powers..............................................................................180 A. Adding Levels and Strategies to the Model..................................................181 B. Testing the Model............................................................................................ 182
Contents vii II. General Data Protection Regulation.....................................................................182 A. The Commission’s Proposal........................................................................... 182 B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the GDPR..................................... 185 C. Assessment...................................................................................................... 188 III. Data Governance Act............................................................................................ 190 A. The Commissions Proposal...........................................................................190 B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the Data Governance Act........... 191 C. Assessment..................................................................................................... 193 IV. Refining the Model.................................................................................................195 8. Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 197 I. Looking Back......................................................................................................... 197 II. ... to Move Forward.............................................................................................. 200 Annex: Overview of Autonomous Executive Legal Bases............................................... 203
Index.............................................................................................................................................. 207
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS Table of Cases. ix List ofFigures. xv List of Tables. xvii 1. Introduction. 1 I. A Primer: Operationalising Institutional Balance as a Yardstick for Assessing Institutional Developments. 2 A. Devising an Institutional Balance Test. 8 B. Applying the Institutional Balance Test to Identify Constitutional Modifications 10 II. Structure of the Enquiry. 11 2. A Formal Reading of the Lisbon Treaty. 12 I. The Formal Catalogue of Acts. 12 II. The Lisbon Treaty’s ‘Atypical’ Acts. 13 III. The Distinction between Delegated and Implementing Acts: A Cursory Reading of the
TFEU. 16 A. Key Features of Article 290 TFEU. 19 B. Key Features of Article 291 TFEU. 21 IV. Parliamentary Control Over Post-Lisbon Executive Acts. 24 3. The Road Leading Up to the Lisbon Treaty.27 I. Comitology’s Origins and Original Sin. 27 II. Judicial Sanctioning of Comitology and the Commission’s Broad Implementing Powers. 30 III. From the Single European Act to the 2006 Revision of the Second Comitology Decision. 32 A. Codification: The SEA and the First Comitology Decision. 33 B. A Call for Parliamentarisation and the Second Comitology Decision.34 C. The Constitution and the Amendment of the Second Comitology Decision. 37 IV. A Recalibrated Institutional Balance. 41 4. The Exponential Multiplication of Delimitation Problems. 44 I. Delimitation of Autonomous Executive Acts against (Delegated) Legislation and
Implementation. 45 A. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Legislation. 45 B. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Implementation.48 C. Institutional Implications. 50
vi Contents II. III. Delimitation of Legislation and Delegation.50 Delimitation of Delegated and Implementing Acts. 53 A. Judicial Clarifications in Biocides, Eures Network and Visa Reciprocity. 57 B. Amendments as Implementation. 61 C. The PRAC, a Zombie in EU Law. 62 D. The 2019 Inter-Institutional Agreement. 65 E. Legislative Practice in Light of the 2019 ILA. 71 5. Delegated Power: Further Limits and Procedure. 75 I. The Passive Personal Scope of Article 290 TFEU.76 II. Breaking Down the Specificity Requirement. 79 A. Duration and Objectives. 80 B. Content and Scope. 81 III. Testing Specificity in Practice. 84 IV. Procedural Limits to the Exercise of Delegated Powers. 88 A. The Drafting of Delegated Acts. 91 B. The Control
Exercised by the Legislator: Objection and Revocation.100 6. Implementing Power: Triggering Factors, Nature, Extent and Procedure. Ill I. The Notion of Uniform Conditions. 112 II. Reconceptualising Implementing Powers Post-Lisbon. 117 A. May Implementing Acts Implement Delegated Acts?.117 B. The Nature and Extent of Implementing Powers under Article 291 TFEU. 122 C. The Eures Network Standard as the Single Standard for Implementation. 127 D. The Institutions’ Constitutional Modification of Article 291 (2) TFEU. 128 III. Exceptional Implementation by the Council. 129 A. CFSP Implementation by the Council. 130 B. Duly Justified Specific Cases of Implementation by the Council. 131 C. Implementation by the European Council. 138 IV. The (not so) Closed List of Implementing actors and Implementing Acts. 140 A. EU Agencies. 140 B. Sui Generis Implementing Acts. 149 V. The Comitology
Procedures. 151 A. The Proposal for and Negotiations on the Comitology Regulation. 152 B. The Comitology Regulation. 154 C. The Functioning of the Post-Lisbon Comitology Regime. 166 D. The European Parliament’s Droit de Regard. 170 VI. No Self-Love, the 2017 Proposal to Amend theComitology Regulation. 174 7. The Practice and Politics of Delegated Legislation. 180 I. Strategies in Delegating Powers.180 A. Adding Levels and Strategies to the Model.181 B. Testing the Model. 182
Contents vii II. General Data Protection Regulation.182 A. The Commission’s Proposal. 182 B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the GDPR. 185 C. Assessment. 188 III. Data Governance Act. 190 A. The Commissions Proposal.190 B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the Data Governance Act. 191 C. Assessment. 193 IV. Refining the Model.195 8. Conclusion. 197 I. Looking Back. 197 II. . to Move Forward. 200 Annex: Overview of Autonomous Executive Legal Bases. 203
Index. 207 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Chamon, Merijn 1986- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1104271346 |
| author_facet | Chamon, Merijn 1986- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Chamon, Merijn 1986- |
| author_variant | m c mc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048643649 |
| classification_rvk | MK 5110 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1371322636 (DE-599)BVBBV048643649 |
| discipline | Politologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03045nam a2200469 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048643649</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230111s2022 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509931859</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5099-3185-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509931859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1371322636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048643649</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MK 5110</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123070:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chamon, Merijn</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1104271346</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The European Parliament and delegated legislation</subfield><subfield code="b">an institutional balance perspective</subfield><subfield code="c">Merijn Charmon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiv, 213 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">244 mm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parliamentary Democracy in Europe</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Parliament vis-à-vis both the European Commission and the Council. The book explores whether Parliament's formally reinforced role is reflected in the actual balance of powers in the area of delegated legislation and executive rule-making. It does so by assessing how both the law and practice of decision-making at the legislative level, looking at specific case studies, and the sub-legislative level, examining the scrutiny over delegated legislation, has crystallized in the ten years following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This rigorous study gives a fascinating insight into one of the most significant developments in European parliamentary law-making, which EU constitutional lawyers will find required reading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäisches Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1051754-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh / LAW / International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071795-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131720-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäisches Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1051754-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071795-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131720-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-50993-187-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-50993-186-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Parliamentary Democracy in Europe</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV043673779</subfield><subfield code="9">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034018524&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034018524</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048643649 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:18:26Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:44:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781509931859 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034018524 |
| oclc_num | 1371322636 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | xiv, 213 Seiten Diagramme 244 mm |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Parliamentary Democracy in Europe |
| series2 | Parliamentary Democracy in Europe |
| spelling | Chamon, Merijn 1986- Verfasser (DE-588)1104271346 aut The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective Merijn Charmon Oxford Hart 2022 © 2022 xiv, 213 Seiten Diagramme 244 mm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Parliamentary Democracy in Europe volume 8 This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Parliament vis-à-vis both the European Commission and the Council. The book explores whether Parliament's formally reinforced role is reflected in the actual balance of powers in the area of delegated legislation and executive rule-making. It does so by assessing how both the law and practice of decision-making at the legislative level, looking at specific case studies, and the sub-legislative level, examining the scrutiny over delegated legislation, has crystallized in the ten years following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This rigorous study gives a fascinating insight into one of the most significant developments in European parliamentary law-making, which EU constitutional lawyers will find required reading Europäisches Parlament (DE-588)1051754-6 gnd rswk-swf bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice bisacsh / LAW / International Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd rswk-swf Gesetzgebungsverfahren (DE-588)4131720-8 gnd rswk-swf Europäisches Parlament (DE-588)1051754-6 b Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 s Gesetzgebungsverfahren (DE-588)4131720-8 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 978-1-50993-187-3 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB 978-1-50993-186-6 Parliamentary Democracy in Europe volume 8 (DE-604)BV043673779 8 Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034018524&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Chamon, Merijn 1986- The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective Parliamentary Democracy in Europe Europäisches Parlament (DE-588)1051754-6 gnd bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice bisacsh / LAW / International Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd Gesetzgebungsverfahren (DE-588)4131720-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1051754-6 (DE-588)4071795-1 (DE-588)4131720-8 |
| title | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective |
| title_auth | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective |
| title_exact_search | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective |
| title_full | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective Merijn Charmon |
| title_fullStr | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective Merijn Charmon |
| title_full_unstemmed | The European Parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective Merijn Charmon |
| title_short | The European Parliament and delegated legislation |
| title_sort | the european parliament and delegated legislation an institutional balance perspective |
| title_sub | an institutional balance perspective |
| topic | Europäisches Parlament (DE-588)1051754-6 gnd bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice bisacsh / LAW / International Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd Gesetzgebungsverfahren (DE-588)4131720-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäisches Parlament bicssc / Parliamentary & legislative practice bisacsh / LAW / International Gesetzgebungskompetenz Gesetzgebungsverfahren |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034018524&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV043673779 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chamonmerijn theeuropeanparliamentanddelegatedlegislationaninstitutionalbalanceperspective |