Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge:
Gespeichert in:
| Körperschaft: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Geneva
World Intellectual Property Organization
2020
|
| Ausgabe: | 2nd ed |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (95 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9789280531411 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048632374 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230105s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789280531411 |q electronic bk. |9 978-92-805-3141-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7113869 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7113869 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7113869 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1348486832 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048632374 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 110 | 2 | |a Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| 250 | |a 2nd ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Geneva |b World Intellectual Property Organization |c 2020 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (95 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- List of boxes and figures -- List of acronyms -- 1. Introduction -- The aims of this study -- How to use this study -- 2. Background and concept -- What are patent disclosure requirements related to GRs and TK? -- How do new PDRs related to GRs and TK differ from conventional disclosure requirements under established patent law principles and procedures? -- What is the relationship between new PDRs and ABS obligations? -- What are the main critiques and opposing views? -- Why have several countries introduced new PDRs related to GRs and TK? -- What interests and objectives may need to be balanced when shaping an appropriate disclosure obligation? -- What is the difference between voluntary and compulsory PDRs? -- What role might the patent office play in checking the fulfillment of new formal or substantive PDRs? -- Is it possible to introduce new disclosure requirements in legislation other than patent and/or IP law? -- Where should new disclosure requirements be introduced? -- What is the subject matter covered by these new PDRs? -- What might be the possible content of disclosure? -- What is the geographical scope of disclosure? -- What exclusions from the material scope of application of a new PDR might be envisaged? -- What relationship or link between the subject matter of disclosure and the claimed invention will trigger the application of a new PDR? -- What kinds of remedies and sanctions are available to address issues of non- compliance with any new PDRs? -- What evidence might be submitted in the context of new PDR-related compliance mechanisms and procedures? -- Who might have a right to take legal action for non-compliance with a new PDR? -- What legal, institutional and policy capacities might be needed to implement a new PDR? | |
| 505 | 8 | |a What is the possible relationship between a new PDR and ABS obligations under the FAO ITPGRFA? -- What are the main implications of establishing the patent/IP office as a designated checkpoint under the Nagoya Protocol? -- Under the Nagoya Protocol, is there an obligation to provide for PDRs in order to monitor users' compliance with domestic ABS requirements? -- Are there alternative and/or complementary measures or mechanisms that can be used to promote PDR-related objectives? -- 19. PDRs - a checklist for policymakers -- Endnotes -- Annex: Disclosure Requirements Table -- Box 1: Spotlight -- Box 4: The Bonn Guidelines on ABS -- Box 5: The definition of biopiracy in Peru -- Box 2: Key principles on ABS of the CBD -- Box 3: The WIPO Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure -- Box 6: Spotlight -- Box 8: Interaction between GRs, TK and IP -- Box 9: Policy coherence between the ABS authority and the patent office in Panama -- Box 7: Enhancing transparency of the patent system in Belgium -- Box 10: Spotlight -- Box 23: Consequences of failure to comply -- Box 21: Qualitative methods to identify appropriate markers for triggering a new PDR -- Box 22: Background on definitions in the context of the Nagoya Protocol -- Box 18: Contract law: "derived product" under MTAs -- Box 20: PDRs based on absolute reciprocity between the countries of the Andean Community -- Box 16: The subject matter of disclosure -- Box 17: The Nagoya Protocol on ABS -- Box 11: Balancing ABS and innovation governance in Brazil -- Box 12: Disclosure requirements in biodiversity laws -- Box 13: Biodiversity Law of France3 -- Box 14: Vanuatu's framework for PDRs -- Box 15: Disclosure requirements in the Plant Variety Act of Norway -- Box 25: African geranium (the pelargonium patent) | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Box 26: Indian Institutional Framework -- Box 27: Regional Strategy for Andean Countries -- Box 28: German Law on new PDRs -- Box 29: South African depository system -- Box 30: Information technologies in South Africa -- Box 31: The Nagoya Protocol, 2010 -- Box 32: Nagoya Protocol Article 17 - Monitoring the Utilization of GRs -- Box 33: The SMTA reporting obligations -- Box 34: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), India -- Box 35: The WTO TRIPS Agreement -- Box 36: Indian Patent Act, 1970 -- Figure 3: ARIPO TK database | |
| 653 | 6 | |a Electronic books | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization |t Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |d Geneva : World Intellectual Property Organization,c2020 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034007393 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184765644931072 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author_corporate | Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization |
| author_corporate_role | aut |
| author_facet | Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization |
| author_sort | Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048632374 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- List of boxes and figures -- List of acronyms -- 1. Introduction -- The aims of this study -- How to use this study -- 2. Background and concept -- What are patent disclosure requirements related to GRs and TK? -- How do new PDRs related to GRs and TK differ from conventional disclosure requirements under established patent law principles and procedures? -- What is the relationship between new PDRs and ABS obligations? -- What are the main critiques and opposing views? -- Why have several countries introduced new PDRs related to GRs and TK? -- What interests and objectives may need to be balanced when shaping an appropriate disclosure obligation? -- What is the difference between voluntary and compulsory PDRs? -- What role might the patent office play in checking the fulfillment of new formal or substantive PDRs? -- Is it possible to introduce new disclosure requirements in legislation other than patent and/or IP law? -- Where should new disclosure requirements be introduced? -- What is the subject matter covered by these new PDRs? -- What might be the possible content of disclosure? -- What is the geographical scope of disclosure? -- What exclusions from the material scope of application of a new PDR might be envisaged? -- What relationship or link between the subject matter of disclosure and the claimed invention will trigger the application of a new PDR? -- What kinds of remedies and sanctions are available to address issues of non- compliance with any new PDRs? -- What evidence might be submitted in the context of new PDR-related compliance mechanisms and procedures? -- Who might have a right to take legal action for non-compliance with a new PDR? -- What legal, institutional and policy capacities might be needed to implement a new PDR? What is the possible relationship between a new PDR and ABS obligations under the FAO ITPGRFA? -- What are the main implications of establishing the patent/IP office as a designated checkpoint under the Nagoya Protocol? -- Under the Nagoya Protocol, is there an obligation to provide for PDRs in order to monitor users' compliance with domestic ABS requirements? -- Are there alternative and/or complementary measures or mechanisms that can be used to promote PDR-related objectives? -- 19. PDRs - a checklist for policymakers -- Endnotes -- Annex: Disclosure Requirements Table -- Box 1: Spotlight -- Box 4: The Bonn Guidelines on ABS -- Box 5: The definition of biopiracy in Peru -- Box 2: Key principles on ABS of the CBD -- Box 3: The WIPO Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure -- Box 6: Spotlight -- Box 8: Interaction between GRs, TK and IP -- Box 9: Policy coherence between the ABS authority and the patent office in Panama -- Box 7: Enhancing transparency of the patent system in Belgium -- Box 10: Spotlight -- Box 23: Consequences of failure to comply -- Box 21: Qualitative methods to identify appropriate markers for triggering a new PDR -- Box 22: Background on definitions in the context of the Nagoya Protocol -- Box 18: Contract law: "derived product" under MTAs -- Box 20: PDRs based on absolute reciprocity between the countries of the Andean Community -- Box 16: The subject matter of disclosure -- Box 17: The Nagoya Protocol on ABS -- Box 11: Balancing ABS and innovation governance in Brazil -- Box 12: Disclosure requirements in biodiversity laws -- Box 13: Biodiversity Law of France3 -- Box 14: Vanuatu's framework for PDRs -- Box 15: Disclosure requirements in the Plant Variety Act of Norway -- Box 25: African geranium (the pelargonium patent) Box 26: Indian Institutional Framework -- Box 27: Regional Strategy for Andean Countries -- Box 28: German Law on new PDRs -- Box 29: South African depository system -- Box 30: Information technologies in South Africa -- Box 31: The Nagoya Protocol, 2010 -- Box 32: Nagoya Protocol Article 17 - Monitoring the Utilization of GRs -- Box 33: The SMTA reporting obligations -- Box 34: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), India -- Box 35: The WTO TRIPS Agreement -- Box 36: Indian Patent Act, 1970 -- Figure 3: ARIPO TK database |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7113869 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7113869 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7113869 (OCoLC)1348486832 (DE-599)BVBBV048632374 |
| edition | 2nd ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05539nmm a2200373 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048632374</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230105s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789280531411</subfield><subfield code="q">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-92-805-3141-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7113869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7113869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7113869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1348486832</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048632374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2nd ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geneva</subfield><subfield code="b">World Intellectual Property Organization</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (95 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- List of boxes and figures -- List of acronyms -- 1. Introduction -- The aims of this study -- How to use this study -- 2. Background and concept -- What are patent disclosure requirements related to GRs and TK? -- How do new PDRs related to GRs and TK differ from conventional disclosure requirements under established patent law principles and procedures? -- What is the relationship between new PDRs and ABS obligations? -- What are the main critiques and opposing views? -- Why have several countries introduced new PDRs related to GRs and TK? -- What interests and objectives may need to be balanced when shaping an appropriate disclosure obligation? -- What is the difference between voluntary and compulsory PDRs? -- What role might the patent office play in checking the fulfillment of new formal or substantive PDRs? -- Is it possible to introduce new disclosure requirements in legislation other than patent and/or IP law? -- Where should new disclosure requirements be introduced? -- What is the subject matter covered by these new PDRs? -- What might be the possible content of disclosure? -- What is the geographical scope of disclosure? -- What exclusions from the material scope of application of a new PDR might be envisaged? -- What relationship or link between the subject matter of disclosure and the claimed invention will trigger the application of a new PDR? -- What kinds of remedies and sanctions are available to address issues of non- compliance with any new PDRs? -- What evidence might be submitted in the context of new PDR-related compliance mechanisms and procedures? -- Who might have a right to take legal action for non-compliance with a new PDR? -- What legal, institutional and policy capacities might be needed to implement a new PDR?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What is the possible relationship between a new PDR and ABS obligations under the FAO ITPGRFA? -- What are the main implications of establishing the patent/IP office as a designated checkpoint under the Nagoya Protocol? -- Under the Nagoya Protocol, is there an obligation to provide for PDRs in order to monitor users' compliance with domestic ABS requirements? -- Are there alternative and/or complementary measures or mechanisms that can be used to promote PDR-related objectives? -- 19. PDRs - a checklist for policymakers -- Endnotes -- Annex: Disclosure Requirements Table -- Box 1: Spotlight -- Box 4: The Bonn Guidelines on ABS -- Box 5: The definition of biopiracy in Peru -- Box 2: Key principles on ABS of the CBD -- Box 3: The WIPO Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure -- Box 6: Spotlight -- Box 8: Interaction between GRs, TK and IP -- Box 9: Policy coherence between the ABS authority and the patent office in Panama -- Box 7: Enhancing transparency of the patent system in Belgium -- Box 10: Spotlight -- Box 23: Consequences of failure to comply -- Box 21: Qualitative methods to identify appropriate markers for triggering a new PDR -- Box 22: Background on definitions in the context of the Nagoya Protocol -- Box 18: Contract law: "derived product" under MTAs -- Box 20: PDRs based on absolute reciprocity between the countries of the Andean Community -- Box 16: The subject matter of disclosure -- Box 17: The Nagoya Protocol on ABS -- Box 11: Balancing ABS and innovation governance in Brazil -- Box 12: Disclosure requirements in biodiversity laws -- Box 13: Biodiversity Law of France3 -- Box 14: Vanuatu's framework for PDRs -- Box 15: Disclosure requirements in the Plant Variety Act of Norway -- Box 25: African geranium (the pelargonium patent)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Box 26: Indian Institutional Framework -- Box 27: Regional Strategy for Andean Countries -- Box 28: German Law on new PDRs -- Box 29: South African depository system -- Box 30: Information technologies in South Africa -- Box 31: The Nagoya Protocol, 2010 -- Box 32: Nagoya Protocol Article 17 - Monitoring the Utilization of GRs -- Box 33: The SMTA reporting obligations -- Box 34: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), India -- Box 35: The WTO TRIPS Agreement -- Box 36: Indian Patent Act, 1970 -- Figure 3: ARIPO TK database</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Electronic books</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization</subfield><subfield code="t">Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge</subfield><subfield code="d">Geneva : World Intellectual Property Organization,c2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034007393</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048632374 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:16:06Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:44:32Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789280531411 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034007393 |
| oclc_num | 1348486832 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (95 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | World Intellectual Property Organization |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization Verfasser aut Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge 2nd ed Geneva World Intellectual Property Organization 2020 ©2020 1 Online-Ressource (95 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- List of boxes and figures -- List of acronyms -- 1. Introduction -- The aims of this study -- How to use this study -- 2. Background and concept -- What are patent disclosure requirements related to GRs and TK? -- How do new PDRs related to GRs and TK differ from conventional disclosure requirements under established patent law principles and procedures? -- What is the relationship between new PDRs and ABS obligations? -- What are the main critiques and opposing views? -- Why have several countries introduced new PDRs related to GRs and TK? -- What interests and objectives may need to be balanced when shaping an appropriate disclosure obligation? -- What is the difference between voluntary and compulsory PDRs? -- What role might the patent office play in checking the fulfillment of new formal or substantive PDRs? -- Is it possible to introduce new disclosure requirements in legislation other than patent and/or IP law? -- Where should new disclosure requirements be introduced? -- What is the subject matter covered by these new PDRs? -- What might be the possible content of disclosure? -- What is the geographical scope of disclosure? -- What exclusions from the material scope of application of a new PDR might be envisaged? -- What relationship or link between the subject matter of disclosure and the claimed invention will trigger the application of a new PDR? -- What kinds of remedies and sanctions are available to address issues of non- compliance with any new PDRs? -- What evidence might be submitted in the context of new PDR-related compliance mechanisms and procedures? -- Who might have a right to take legal action for non-compliance with a new PDR? -- What legal, institutional and policy capacities might be needed to implement a new PDR? What is the possible relationship between a new PDR and ABS obligations under the FAO ITPGRFA? -- What are the main implications of establishing the patent/IP office as a designated checkpoint under the Nagoya Protocol? -- Under the Nagoya Protocol, is there an obligation to provide for PDRs in order to monitor users' compliance with domestic ABS requirements? -- Are there alternative and/or complementary measures or mechanisms that can be used to promote PDR-related objectives? -- 19. PDRs - a checklist for policymakers -- Endnotes -- Annex: Disclosure Requirements Table -- Box 1: Spotlight -- Box 4: The Bonn Guidelines on ABS -- Box 5: The definition of biopiracy in Peru -- Box 2: Key principles on ABS of the CBD -- Box 3: The WIPO Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure -- Box 6: Spotlight -- Box 8: Interaction between GRs, TK and IP -- Box 9: Policy coherence between the ABS authority and the patent office in Panama -- Box 7: Enhancing transparency of the patent system in Belgium -- Box 10: Spotlight -- Box 23: Consequences of failure to comply -- Box 21: Qualitative methods to identify appropriate markers for triggering a new PDR -- Box 22: Background on definitions in the context of the Nagoya Protocol -- Box 18: Contract law: "derived product" under MTAs -- Box 20: PDRs based on absolute reciprocity between the countries of the Andean Community -- Box 16: The subject matter of disclosure -- Box 17: The Nagoya Protocol on ABS -- Box 11: Balancing ABS and innovation governance in Brazil -- Box 12: Disclosure requirements in biodiversity laws -- Box 13: Biodiversity Law of France3 -- Box 14: Vanuatu's framework for PDRs -- Box 15: Disclosure requirements in the Plant Variety Act of Norway -- Box 25: African geranium (the pelargonium patent) Box 26: Indian Institutional Framework -- Box 27: Regional Strategy for Andean Countries -- Box 28: German Law on new PDRs -- Box 29: South African depository system -- Box 30: Information technologies in South Africa -- Box 31: The Nagoya Protocol, 2010 -- Box 32: Nagoya Protocol Article 17 - Monitoring the Utilization of GRs -- Box 33: The SMTA reporting obligations -- Box 34: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), India -- Box 35: The WTO TRIPS Agreement -- Box 36: Indian Patent Act, 1970 -- Figure 3: ARIPO TK database Electronic books Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Staff, World Intellectual Property Organization Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Geneva : World Intellectual Property Organization,c2020 |
| spellingShingle | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- List of boxes and figures -- List of acronyms -- 1. Introduction -- The aims of this study -- How to use this study -- 2. Background and concept -- What are patent disclosure requirements related to GRs and TK? -- How do new PDRs related to GRs and TK differ from conventional disclosure requirements under established patent law principles and procedures? -- What is the relationship between new PDRs and ABS obligations? -- What are the main critiques and opposing views? -- Why have several countries introduced new PDRs related to GRs and TK? -- What interests and objectives may need to be balanced when shaping an appropriate disclosure obligation? -- What is the difference between voluntary and compulsory PDRs? -- What role might the patent office play in checking the fulfillment of new formal or substantive PDRs? -- Is it possible to introduce new disclosure requirements in legislation other than patent and/or IP law? -- Where should new disclosure requirements be introduced? -- What is the subject matter covered by these new PDRs? -- What might be the possible content of disclosure? -- What is the geographical scope of disclosure? -- What exclusions from the material scope of application of a new PDR might be envisaged? -- What relationship or link between the subject matter of disclosure and the claimed invention will trigger the application of a new PDR? -- What kinds of remedies and sanctions are available to address issues of non- compliance with any new PDRs? -- What evidence might be submitted in the context of new PDR-related compliance mechanisms and procedures? -- Who might have a right to take legal action for non-compliance with a new PDR? -- What legal, institutional and policy capacities might be needed to implement a new PDR? What is the possible relationship between a new PDR and ABS obligations under the FAO ITPGRFA? -- What are the main implications of establishing the patent/IP office as a designated checkpoint under the Nagoya Protocol? -- Under the Nagoya Protocol, is there an obligation to provide for PDRs in order to monitor users' compliance with domestic ABS requirements? -- Are there alternative and/or complementary measures or mechanisms that can be used to promote PDR-related objectives? -- 19. PDRs - a checklist for policymakers -- Endnotes -- Annex: Disclosure Requirements Table -- Box 1: Spotlight -- Box 4: The Bonn Guidelines on ABS -- Box 5: The definition of biopiracy in Peru -- Box 2: Key principles on ABS of the CBD -- Box 3: The WIPO Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure -- Box 6: Spotlight -- Box 8: Interaction between GRs, TK and IP -- Box 9: Policy coherence between the ABS authority and the patent office in Panama -- Box 7: Enhancing transparency of the patent system in Belgium -- Box 10: Spotlight -- Box 23: Consequences of failure to comply -- Box 21: Qualitative methods to identify appropriate markers for triggering a new PDR -- Box 22: Background on definitions in the context of the Nagoya Protocol -- Box 18: Contract law: "derived product" under MTAs -- Box 20: PDRs based on absolute reciprocity between the countries of the Andean Community -- Box 16: The subject matter of disclosure -- Box 17: The Nagoya Protocol on ABS -- Box 11: Balancing ABS and innovation governance in Brazil -- Box 12: Disclosure requirements in biodiversity laws -- Box 13: Biodiversity Law of France3 -- Box 14: Vanuatu's framework for PDRs -- Box 15: Disclosure requirements in the Plant Variety Act of Norway -- Box 25: African geranium (the pelargonium patent) Box 26: Indian Institutional Framework -- Box 27: Regional Strategy for Andean Countries -- Box 28: German Law on new PDRs -- Box 29: South African depository system -- Box 30: Information technologies in South Africa -- Box 31: The Nagoya Protocol, 2010 -- Box 32: Nagoya Protocol Article 17 - Monitoring the Utilization of GRs -- Box 33: The SMTA reporting obligations -- Box 34: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), India -- Box 35: The WTO TRIPS Agreement -- Box 36: Indian Patent Act, 1970 -- Figure 3: ARIPO TK database |
| title | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_auth | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_exact_search | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_full | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_fullStr | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_full_unstemmed | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_short | Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge |
| title_sort | key questions on patent disclosure requirements for genetic resources and traditional knowledge |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT staffworldintellectualpropertyorganization keyquestionsonpatentdisclosurerequirementsforgeneticresourcesandtraditionalknowledge |