What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and le...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
New York University Press
[2022]
|
| Ausgabe: | Revised edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-188 DE-19 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court's 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court's legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years' experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation-and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it-and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 288 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781479824465 |
| DOI: | 10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048607815 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240222 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221213s2022 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781479824465 |9 978-1-4798-2446-5 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9781479824465 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1355304577 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048607815 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73084 |2 22 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said |b The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |c edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin |
| 250 | |a Revised edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b New York University Press |c [2022] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2023 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 288 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court's 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court's legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years' experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation-and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it-and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Legal History |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trials (Abortion) |z United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Balkin, Jack M. |d 1956- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)173307728 |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-1-4798-2448-9 |w (DE-604)BV019985846 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033983238 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |l DE-188 |p ZDB-23-DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |l DE-19 |p ZDB-23-DGC |q UBM_Paketkauf_2023 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1824508163570794496 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author_GND | (DE-588)173307728 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048607815 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9781479824465 (OCoLC)1355304577 (DE-599)BVBBV048607815 |
| dewey-full | 342.73084 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73084 |
| dewey-search | 342.73084 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73084 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |
| edition | Revised edition |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048607815</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240222</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221213s2022 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781479824465</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4798-2446-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9781479824465</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1355304577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048607815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73084</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said</subfield><subfield code="b">The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision</subfield><subfield code="c">edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revised edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">New York University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 288 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court's 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court's legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years' experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation-and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it-and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Legal History</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials (Abortion)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balkin, Jack M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)173307728</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-4798-2448-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV019985846</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033983238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGC</subfield><subfield code="q">UBM_Paketkauf_2023</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048607815 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:11:19Z |
| indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:36:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781479824465 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033983238 |
| oclc_num | 1355304577 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 288 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGC ZDB-23-DGC UBM_Paketkauf_2023 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | New York University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin Revised edition New York, NY New York University Press [2022] © 2023 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 288 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court's 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court's legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years' experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation-and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it-and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath In English LAW / Legal History bisacsh Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States Balkin, Jack M. 1956- Sonstige (DE-588)173307728 oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-1-4798-2448-9 (DE-604)BV019985846 https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision LAW / Legal History bisacsh Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States |
| title | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |
| title_auth | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |
| title_exact_search | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |
| title_exact_search_txtP | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |
| title_full | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin |
| title_fullStr | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin |
| title_full_unstemmed | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin |
| title_short | What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said |
| title_sort | what roe v wade should have said the nation s top legal experts rewrite america s most controversial decision |
| title_sub | The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision |
| topic | LAW / Legal History bisacsh Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States |
| topic_facet | LAW / Legal History Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824465.001.0001 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT balkinjackm whatroevwadeshouldhavesaidthenationstoplegalexpertsrewriteamericasmostcontroversialdecision |