Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthus...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, MA
Harvard University Press
[2014]
|
| Ausgabe: | Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries only |
| Schriftenreihe: | The Tanner Lectures on Human Values
14 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps. Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech. Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (264 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9780674369603 |
| DOI: | 10.4159/9780674369603 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048607452 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221213s2014 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780674369603 |9 978-0-674-36960-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4159/9780674369603 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780674369603 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)881430453 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048607452 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1043 |a DE-1046 |a DE-858 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73078 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Post, Robert C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Citizens Divided |b Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |c Robert C. Post |
| 250 | |a Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries only | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, MA |b Harvard University Press |c [2014] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (264 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a The Tanner Lectures on Human Values |v 14 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022) | ||
| 520 | |a The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps. Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech. Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Constitutional |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Campaign funds |x Law and legislation |x United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Campaign funds |x Law and legislation |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |x United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Election law |x United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Election law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Elections |x United States |x United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Elections |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law reform |x United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law reform |z United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Karlan, Pamela S. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lessig, Lawrence |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Michelman, Frank |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Post, Robert C. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Urbinati, Nadia |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033982875 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-1043 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-858 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-859 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-860 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-739 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1824508162745565184 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Post, Robert C. |
| author_facet | Post, Robert C. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Post, Robert C. |
| author_variant | r c p rc rcp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048607452 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780674369603 (OCoLC)881430453 (DE-599)BVBBV048607452 |
| dewey-full | 342.73078 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73078 |
| dewey-search | 342.73078 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73078 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4159/9780674369603 |
| edition | Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries only |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048607452</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221213s2014 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-674-36960-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780674369603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)881430453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048607452</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73078</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Post, Robert C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Citizens Divided</subfield><subfield code="b">Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution</subfield><subfield code="c">Robert C. Post</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries only</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, MA</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2014]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (264 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Tanner Lectures on Human Values</subfield><subfield code="v">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps. Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech. Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Campaign funds</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Campaign funds</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elections</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elections</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law reform</subfield><subfield code="x">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law reform</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karlan, Pamela S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lessig, Lawrence</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michelman, Frank</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Post, Robert C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urbinati, Nadia</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033982875</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048607452 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:11:18Z |
| indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:36:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780674369603 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033982875 |
| oclc_num | 881430453 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (264 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Harvard University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | The Tanner Lectures on Human Values |
| spelling | Post, Robert C. Verfasser aut Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution Robert C. Post Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries only Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press [2014] © 2014 1 Online-Ressource (264 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 14 Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022) The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps. Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech. Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity In English LAW / Constitutional bisacsh Campaign funds Law and legislation United States Constitutional law United States Election law United States Elections United States United States Elections United States Law reform United States Karlan, Pamela S. Sonstige oth Lessig, Lawrence Sonstige oth Michelman, Frank Sonstige oth Post, Robert C. Sonstige oth Urbinati, Nadia Sonstige oth https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Post, Robert C. Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution LAW / Constitutional bisacsh Campaign funds Law and legislation United States Constitutional law United States Election law United States Elections United States United States Elections United States Law reform United States |
| title | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |
| title_auth | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |
| title_exact_search | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |
| title_full | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution Robert C. Post |
| title_fullStr | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution Robert C. Post |
| title_full_unstemmed | Citizens Divided Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution Robert C. Post |
| title_short | Citizens Divided |
| title_sort | citizens divided campaign finance reform and the constitution |
| title_sub | Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution |
| topic | LAW / Constitutional bisacsh Campaign funds Law and legislation United States Constitutional law United States Election law United States Elections United States United States Elections United States Law reform United States |
| topic_facet | LAW / Constitutional Campaign funds Law and legislation United States Constitutional law United States Election law United States Elections United States United States Elections United States Law reform United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369603 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT postrobertc citizensdividedcampaignfinancereformandtheconstitution AT karlanpamelas citizensdividedcampaignfinancereformandtheconstitution AT lessiglawrence citizensdividedcampaignfinancereformandtheconstitution AT michelmanfrank citizensdividedcampaignfinancereformandtheconstitution AT urbinatinadia citizensdividedcampaignfinancereformandtheconstitution |