Dyplomacja naukowa: koncepcja - praktyka
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Polish |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Lublin
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 273-306 |
| Beschreibung: | 319 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9788322794654 8322794657 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048579233 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230519 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 221124s2020 |||| 00||| pol d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788322794654 |9 978-83-227-9465-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 8322794657 |9 83-227-9465-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1376412480 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048579233 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a pol | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a HIST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Szkarłat, Monika |d 1979- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1121623972 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dyplomacja naukowa |b koncepcja - praktyka |c Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur |
| 264 | 1 | |a Lublin |b Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 319 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 273-306 | ||
| 546 | |a Zusammenfassungen der Beiträge englisch | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Diplomatie |0 (DE-588)4012402-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4140181-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Außenbeziehungen |0 (DE-588)4143618-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Kooperation |0 (DE-588)4120503-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Ungarn |0 (DE-588)4078541-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Polen |0 (DE-588)4046496-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Dyplomacja | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Nauka | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Organizacje międzynarodowe | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Polityka międzynarodowa | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Współpraca naukowo-techniczna | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Francja | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Japonia | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Polska | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Stany Zjednoczone (USA) | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Węgry | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Wielka Brytania | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Nauka i stosunki międzynarodowe | |
| 653 | 6 | |a Praca zbiorowa | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Polen |0 (DE-588)4046496-9 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ungarn |0 (DE-588)4078541-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Internationale Kooperation |0 (DE-588)4120503-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4140181-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 8 | |a Diplomatie |0 (DE-588)4012402-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 9 | |a Außenbeziehungen |0 (DE-588)4143618-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Łuszczu, Michał |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1276277814 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno |d 1949- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)170116344 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20230519 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033955144 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |g 73 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |g 439 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |g 438 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184608040812544 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Spis treści 7 Wstęp .................................................................................................................... Koncepcja 1. Dyplomacja naukowa ................................................................................. 27 1.1. Nauka i dyplomacja.............................................................................. 27 1.2. Pojęcie „dyplomacji naukowej” ......................................................... 35 1.3. Dyplomacja naukowa w świetle nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych ....................................................................... 59 Praktyka 2. Dyplomacja naukowa państw..................................................................... 67 2.1. Dyplomacja naukowa Stanów Zjednoczonych ................................ 67 2.2. Dyplomacja naukowa Japonii.............................................................. 81 2.3. Dyplomacja naukowa Wielkiej Brytanii............................................. 96 2.4. Dyplomacja naukowa Francji.............................................................. 115 2.5. Dyplomacja naukowa Polski................................................................ 131 2.6. Dyplomacja naukowa Węgier.............................................................. 152 3. Dyplomacja naukowa organizacji międzynarodowych ........................ 175 3.1. Dyplomacja naukowa Unii Europejskiej ........................................... 175 3.2. Dyplomacja naukowa Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych do spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa ............................................. 205 3.3. Dyplomacja
naukowa w ramach wielostronnej współpracy międzynarodowej w Arktyce........................................................ 224 Spis treści ֊ 5
4. Dyplomacja naukowa wspólnotepistemicznych....................................... 249 4.1. Dyplomacja naukowa, wspólnoty epistemiczne i regionalizm w Europie nordycko-baltyckiej................................................... 249 Bibliografia........................................................................................................... 273 Summary............................................................................................................. 307 6 -^ Spis treści
Bibliografía Akty prawne i dokumenty źródłowe Council of the European Union. (2015). Review of the European Research Area advisory structure. Council conclusions (adopted on 01/12/2015). Brussels. European Commission. (2000). Making a reality of The European Research Area: Guidelines for EU research activities (2002-2006): Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM/2000/0612 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2001). The International dimension of the European Rese arch Area: Communication from the Commission. COM/2001/0346 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2006). Europe in the World — Some Practical Proposals for Greater Coherence, Effectiveness and Visibility: Communication from the Commission to the European Council. COM(2006) 278 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2007). Green Paper The European Research Area: New Perspectives. {SEC(2007) 412}. Brussels. European Commission. (2008a). A Strategic European Framework for International Science and Technology Cooperation: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM(2008)588 final of 24.09.2008. Brussels. European Commission. (2008b). INCO-NETprojects: Supporting international science and technology cooperation with major regions of the world. Brussels. European Commission. (2008c). Opening to the world: International cooperation in Science and Technology: Report of the ERA Expert Group. Brussels. European Commission. (2012a).Л Reinforced European Research Area Partnership
for Excellence and Growth: Communication from the Commission to the Euro pean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012) 392 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2012b). Commission Staff Working Document: Accompa nying the document: Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach COM(2012) 497final (SWD(2012) 258 final). Bibliografia 273
European Commission. (2012c). Enhancing andfocusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach. СОМ(2012) 497 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2012d). International Cooperation in Science, Technology and Innovation: Strategies for a Changing World: Report of the Expert Group established to support the further development of an EU international STI cooperation strategy. Brussels. European Commission. (2012e). Projects in support of international research and innovation cooperation: International cooperation activities of the FP7 capacities programme. Brussels. European Commission. (2013). HORIZON 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015. (European Commission Decision C (2015)2453 of 17 April 2015) Brussels. European Commission. (2014a). Basic principles for effective international science, technology and innovation agreements: Executive Summary. Brussels. European Commission. (2014b). Basic principlesfor effective international science, technology and innovation agreements: Main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014c). European added value of EU science, technology and innovation actions and EU-Member State partnership in international cooperation: Main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014d). International science and technology cooperation in theEU’s 7th Framework Programme: The specific programme ‘Cooperation’ and its thematic areas .· main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014e). Report on the implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation . European Commission. (2015a). A new
role for EU Research and Innovation in the benefit of citizens: Towards an open and transformative R Ipolicy: Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE) . European Commission. (2015b). ERA Open to the World EU R I strategy responding to globalisation: Policy Brief by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE). Brussels. European Commission. (2015c). Ex-post evaluation of international cooperation activities of the seventh framework programme’s: Capacities programme : final report. Brussels. European Commission. (2015d). HORIZON 2020 -Work Programme 2016 -2017: 13. Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies. (European Commission Decision C (2015)6776 of 13 October 2015. Brussels. European Commission. (2016a). Implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation. COM(2016) 657 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2016b). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: A vision for Europe. Brussels. European Commission. (2016c). Science and innovation for development: A study into the contribution and complementarity of EU international research and innovation cooperation with developing countries in FP7 (2007-2013): final report. Brussels. 274 -·“-՛ Bibliografia
European Commission. (2016d). Science, research and innovation performance of the EU: A contribution to the Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World agenda. Brussels. European Commission. (2016e). Strategic Plan 2016-2020. Ref. Ares(2016)1051529 - 01/03/2016. Brussels. European Commission. (2017a). Europe’s future Open innovation, open science, open to the world: Reflections of the Research, Innovation and Science Policy Experts (RISE) High Level Group. Brussels. European Commission. (2017b). Evaluation of the Participation of the EU in rese arch and development programmes undertaken by several Member States based on Article 185 of the TFEU: Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels. European Commission. (2017c). Meta-Evaluation ofArticle 185 Initiatives: Report of the Expert Group. Brussels, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/ publication/3966c4a7-b47c-lle7-837e-01aa75ed71al/language-en/format-PDF/ source-66145783. European Commission. (2017d). Public Consultation on the Evaluation ofArticle 185 Initiatives. Brussels. European Commission. (2017e). Strategic Forum for International Science and Technology Cooperation (SFIC) | International Cooperation - Research and Innovation - European Commission, Brussels. European Commission. (2019a). International Cooperation: The EU bi-lateral S T agreements with individual countries, Brussels. European Commission. (2019b). Open Europe.: Policies, reforms and achievements in EU science and innovation 2014-2019 under EU Commissioner Carlos Moedas. Open innovation, open science, open to the world. Brussels. FAO
(1996), Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit plan ofAction, World Food Summit, Rome 13-17 November 1996. FAO (2020c), TransformingAgricultural Research and Extension Systems. Unlocking the potential ofagricultural innovations to achieve Sustainable Development Goals, Rome. Government of Japan (GoJ). (2016). The 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. January 22 2016. Tokyo. House of Lords, Select Committee on Soft Power and the UK’s Influence (2014), Persuasion and Power in Modern World. Report of Session 2013-2014, HL Paper 150. HL Paper 150. House of Parliament. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, (2018). Science Diplomacy. Postnote nr 568 Feb. 2018. Interfax (2018). Cooling between U.S., Russia Doesn’t Affect Space Cooperation NASA official, Moscow, 21 December. Komisja Europejska. (2016). Wspólna wizja, wspólne działanie: Silniejsza Euro pa: Globalna strategia na rzecz polityki zagranicznej i bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej. Bruksela. Konstytucja Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych Do Spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa, (1945), podpisana w Quebec, 16 października 1945 roku, Dz.U. 1958.57.283. Bibliografia -^ 275
Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche and Ministère des affaires étrangères (2014), La coordination de l’action internationale en matière d’en seignement supérieur et de recherche. Ministère des Affaires étrangères (2015). MAEDI21 - Global diplomacy for the 21st century. Paris: Ministère des Affaires étrangères Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (2010). White Paper on Science and Technology 2010. A New Frontier to Be Extended by Value-creating Human Resources -How Science and Technology Should Be for Japan to Make a New Start. Tokyo: MEXT. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) - Directorate General of Global Affairs, Devel opment and Partnerships, (2013). Science Diplomacy for France. Paris: MFA. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA), (2016). Diplomatic Bluebook. Japanese Diplomacy and International Situation in 2015. Tokyo: MOFA. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA), (2018). Diplomatic Bluebook. Japanese Diplomacy and International Situation in 2017. Tokyo: MOFA. Ministry of Higher Education and Research of France, (2010). National Research and Innovation Strategy. Paris. Ministry of Higher education, Research and Innovation of France, (2017). Higher Education and Research in France - Facts and Figures. Paris. Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. o Narodowym Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, Dz.U.2017.1447 t.j. z dnia 2017.07.28. Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. o Narodowym Centrum Nauki, Dz.U. 2018, poz. 947, z późn. zm. Ustawa z dnia 7 lipea 2017 r. o Narodowej Agencji Wymiany Akademickiej, Dz. U. z 2017 r. poz. 1530,
z 2018 r. poz. 1669. Wywiady Wywiad z pracownikiem Ambasady RP we Francji (2019). Paryż. Wywiad z pracownikiem Biura Promocji Nauki PolSCA (2019). Bruksela. Wywiad z pracownikiem Narodowego Centrum Nauki (2019). Kraków. Wywiad z pracownikiem NAWA (2019). Warszawa. Wywiad z pracownikiem Polskiej Akademii Nauk (2019). Warszawa. Wywiad z urzędnikiem Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (2019). Warszawa. 276 ^ Bibliografia
Opracowania zwarte Akerlund, A. (2020). Regeringsstyrning av svensk offentlig diplomati: Om Svenska institutets myndighetsinstruktioner och regleringsbrev 1998-2018. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola. Alston, P. (2005). AW-sta/e actors and human rights. New York: Oxford University Press. Altbach P.G. (2007). Globalization and the University: Realities in an Unequal World. W: International Handbook ofHigher Education (s. 121-140). J.J.F. Forest, P.G. Altbach (red). Dordrecht: Springer. Archer, C., Scrivener, D. (2000). International Co-operation in the Arctic Envi ronment. W: The Arctic. Environment, people, policy (s. 601-619). Μ. Nuttall, T. Callaghan (red). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (2015). Editors’ Introduction: Science, Technology, and Innovation Go Global. W: The handbook ofglobal science, technology, and inno vation (ss. 1-11). D. Archibugi, A. Filippetti (red.). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Barr, S., Lüdecke, C. (red.). (2010). The History of the International Polar Years (IPYs). Heidelberg: Springer. Barr, W. (2008). The expeditions of the first international polar year 1882-1883. Calgary: The Arctic Institute of North America. Barston, R.P. (2014). Modern Diplomacy. 4th ed. Madison: Taylor and Francis. Bátora, J., Hynek, N. (2014). Fringe Players and Diplomatic Order, The New Het eronomy. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Bay Rasmussen, S. (2018). The ideas and practices of the European Union’s struc tural antidiplomacy: An unstable equilibrium. Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff. Behr, H., Stivachtis, Y. A. (red.). (2016).
Revisiting the European Union as an empire. Abington, New York: Routledge. Bennett, B. Μ. (2011). The Consolidation and Reconfiguration of “British” Networks of Science, 1800-1970. W: Science and Empire. Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800-1970 (s. 30-45). J.M. Hodge, B.M. Ben nett (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Berman, Μ.R. Johnson, J.E. (1977). Unofficial Diplomats. New York: Columbia University Press. Berridge, G., Keens-Soper, H.M.A., Otte, T.G. (2001). Diplomatic theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Houndsmill: Palgrave. Bertelsen, R.G. (2019). The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance: The Case ofKnowledge-Based Cooperation and Science Diplomacy. W: The GlobalArctic handbook (s. 251-267). Μ. Finger, L. Heininen (red). Cham: Springer. Bertelsen, R.G. (2020). Science diplomacy and the Arctic. W: Routledge Handbook ofArctic Security (s. 234-245). G. Hoogensen Gjørv, Μ. Lanteigne, H. SamAggrey. London: Routledge. Bertelsen, R.G., Li, X., Gregersen, М.Н. (2016). Chinese Arctic Science Diplomacy: An Instrument for Achieving the Chinese Dream?. W: Global Challenges in the Bibliografia -^ 277
Arctic Region: Sovereignty, environment and geopolitical balance (s. 442-460). E. Conde, S. I. Sanchez (red.). New York: Routledge. Biechi, F., Bremberg, N. (red.). (2018). European Diplomacy in Practice: Interro gating power, agency and change. London: Routledge. Bierzanek R., Symonides J. (1992). Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Bjola, C. (2015). Introduction: making sense ofdigital diplomacy. W: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (s. 1-11). C. Bjola and Μ. Holmes (eds.). London: Routledge. Bjola, C., Kornprobst, Μ. (2018). Understanding international diplomacy. Theory, practice and ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Blockmans, S., Koutrakos, P. (red.). fâ№). Research handbook on theEU’s common foreign and security policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Börzei, T. A., Risse, T., Wiener, A. (red.). (2019). European integration theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boyer, R. (2009). From the Lisbon Agenda to the Lisbon Treaty: national research systems in the context ofEuropean integration and globalization. W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 101-126). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Brown, L.R. (1972). World Without Borders: The Interdependence ofNations. New York: Foreign Policy Association. Bryla, J. (1998). Czynniki kształtujące stosunki międzynarodowe. W: Stosunki mię dzynarodowe (s. 25-36). W. Malendowski, Cz. Mojsiewicz (red.). Wroclaw: Atla2. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, Μ.,
Reus-Smit, Ch., True, J. (2009). Theories ofInternational Relations. 4th edition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. (1998). Security. A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Caloghirou, Y, Vonortas, N. S., Ioannides, S. (red.). ĢBM). European collaboration in research and development: Business strategy and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Campbell, C.A. (2015). US Science Diplomacy with Arab Countries. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 22-46). L.S. Davis, R. G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Caracostas, P., Muldur, U. (2003). The Emergence ofa New European Union Rese arch and Innovation Policy. W: Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. An international comparative analysis (s. 157-203). P. Larédo (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Carta, C. (2012). European Union Diplomatic service: Ideas, preferences and identities. Abingdon: Routledge. Carta, C., Higgott, R. A. (red.). (2020). Cultural diplomacy in Europe: Between the domestic and the international. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Chaban, N., Holland, Μ. (2019). Shaping the EU Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 278 ^ Bibliografia
Chou, М-H., Gornitzka, A. (red.). (2014). Building the knowledge economy in Euro pe: New constellations in European research and higher education governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Cohen R. (1998). Putting diplomatic studies on the map. Diplomatic Studies Pro gramme Newsletter. Leicester: Leicester University. Constantinou, C.M., Cornago N., McConnell, F. (2016). Transprofessional diplo macy. Leiden: Brill. Constantinou, C.M., Sharp, P. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives in Diplomacy. W; The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (s. 13-27). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cooper, A.F., Heine, J., Thakur, R (red). (2013). The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Copeland, D. (2016). Science Diplomacy. W: The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (s. 628-640). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cornago, N. (2016). Diplomatic Knowledge. W: The SAGE Handbook of Diploma cy (s. 133-146). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cox, R.W., Jacobsen, H.K., (1973). The Anatomy of Influence. Decision Making in International Organization. New Haven: Yale University Press. Cross, M.’a. K. D., Melissen, J. (2013). European public diplomacy: Soft power at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Crowther, J. G. (1937). FamousAmericanMen ofScience. NewYork: W. Norton Co., Inc. Czapliński W., A. Wyrozumska A., (2004). Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa: C.H. Beck. Delanghe, H., Muldur, U., Soete, L. (red.). (2009).
European science and techno logypolicy: Towards integration orfragmentation?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DeVorkin, D. (1992). Science with a Vengeance ; How the Military Created the US Space Sciences after World War II. New York: Springer-Verlag. Dratwa, J. (2009). Analysing Community policies. W: European science and tech nologypolicy: Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 78-97). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W. (2006). Global scientization: An environmentfor expanded organization. W: Globalization and organization: World society and organiza tional change (s. 50-68). G.S. Drori, J.W. Meyer, H. Wang (red.). New York: Oxford University Press. Edgerton, D. (1997). Science in the United Kingdom: A Study in the Nationalization of Science. W: Science in the Twentieth Century (s. 815-838). J. Krige, D. Pestre (red.). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S., Behrens, Μ. (red.). (2004). Changing governance of research and technology policy: The European research area. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Emmers, R. (2015). Securitization. W: Contemporary Security Studies (s. 168-181). A. Collins (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bibliografia ·«֊ 279
Ewert, S. (2012). Region Building im Ostseeraum: Zur Rolle der Hochschulen im Prozess der Regionalisierung im Nordosten der Europäischen Union. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Eysymontt, Μ. (2019). Pozycja instytucjonalna urzędu Wysokiego Przedstawiciela Unii do Spraw Zagranicznych i Polityki Bezpieczeństwa: Od koncepcji, przez narodziny, po nieustanną ewolucję. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck. Flink, T., Rüffln N., (2019). The Current State of Art of Science Diplomacy. W: Handbook on Science and Public Diplomacy (s. 104-121). D. Simon. E. Kuh lmann, J. Stamm, W. Canzler (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Garnett, Μ., Mabon, S. and Smith, R. (2018). British Foreign Policy since 1945. New York: Routledge. Gaskarth, J., Porter, R. and Edmunds, T. (2014). Introduction. W: British Foreign Policy and the National Interest. Identity, Strategy and Security (s. 1-23). T. Edmunds, J. Gaskarth, R. Porter, (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Gilmore, J. (2014). The Uncertain Merger of Values and Interests in UK Foreign Policy. W: British Foreign Policy and the National Interest. Identity, Strategy and Security (s. 23-42). T. Edmunds, J. Gaskarth, R. Porter, (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Glover, N. (2011). National relations: public diplomacy, national identity and the Swedish Institute 1945-1970. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. Gornitzka, A. (2009). Research Policy and the European Union - Multi-Layered Policy Change? W: The Research Mission of the University (s. 53-75). P. Clancy, D.D. Dill (red.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Gstöhl, S., Schunz, S.
(red.). (2018). Theorizing the European neighbourhoodpolicy. Abingdon: Routledge. Gurgul, H. (2002). Biale pustynie - Arktyka. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Kurpisz. Guzzetti, L. (2009). The European Research Area’ idea in the history of Com munity policy-making. W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 64-77). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Hallonsten, O. (2014). The Politics ofEuropean Collaboration in Big Science. W: The Global Politics ofScience and Technology - Vol. 2: Perspectives, Cases and Methods (s. 31-46). Μ. Mayer, Μ. Carpes, R. Knoblich (red.). Heidelberg: Springer. Hanne, K. (2017). Introduction: Emergence of a European Model Region. W: The Baltic Sea Region: A Comprehensive Guide. History, Politics, Culture andEconomy of a European Role Model (s. 10-44). B. Henningsen, T. Etzold, К. Hanne (red.). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Hassler, B. (2003). Science and Politics of Foreign Aid: Swedish Environmental Support to the Baltic States. Springer Netherlands. Headrick, D. Μ. (1981). The Tools ofEmpire. Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press. Headrick, D. Μ. (2012). Power over Peoples. Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 280 ·*· Bibliografia
Heininen, L., Everett, К., Padrtova, В., Reissell, А. (2020). Artcic Policies and Strategies-Analysis, Synthesis, and Trends. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (HASA). Hennemann, S., Liefner, I. (2015). Global Science Collaboration. W: The hand book of global science, technology, and innovation (s. 343-363). D. Archibugi, A. Filippetti (red.). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Hill, C., Smith, Μ. (red.). (2017). International relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hocking, B. (1999). Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond ‘Newness’ and ‘Decline’. W: Inno vation in Diplomatic Practice (s. 21-42). J. Melissen (red). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Hodge, J. Μ. (2011). Science and Empire: An Overview of the Historical Scholar ship. W: Science and Empire. Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire 1800-1970 (s. 3-30). J.Μ. Hodge, B.M. Bennett (red.). Basing stoke: Palgrave. Holmes, Μ. (2015). Digital diplomacy: between promises and reality. W: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (s.13-32). C. Bjola, Μ. Holmes (red.). London: Routledge. Huebert, R. (2013). Cooperation or Conflict in the New Arctic? Too Simple of a Dichot omy!. N7: Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean (s. 195-203). P.A. Berkman, A.N. Vylegzhanin (red.). Dordrecht: Springer. Inserra, I. (2017). La diplomatie par la science de la France - Le rôle et la place des attachés scientifiques en ambassades 1955-2015, nieopublikowana praca magisterska, Sorbonne Université. Jakniūnaitė, D., Vaicekauskaitė, Z. Μ. (2017). Baltic Sea Region-Building: An
Impos sibility, oran Inability to Finish? W: Borders in the Baltic Sea Region: Suturing the Ruptures (s. 103-124). A. Makarychev, A. Yatsyk (red.). London: Palgrave. Joenniemi, P., Jervell, S., Kukk, Μ. (red.). (1992). The Baltic Sea area: A region in the making. Oslo: Europa-Programmet in cooperation with the Baltic Institute. Joenniemi, P., Stålvant, C.-E. (red.). (1995). Baltic Sea Politics: Achievements and Challenges. Copenhagen: The Nordic Council. Joenniemi, P., Wæver, О. (f9921). Regionalization around the Baltic Rim, background report to the 2nd parliamentary conference on co-operation in the Baltic Sea Area. Oslo: the Nordic Council. Jönsson, Ch. (2012). Theorising diplomacy. W: Routledge handbook of diplomacy and statecraft (s. 15-28). B.J.C. McKercher (red.). London: Routledge. Jönsson, Ch. (2016). States Only? The Evolution of Diplomacy. W: The Transfor mation of Foreign Policy. Drawing and Managing Boundaries From Antiquity to the Present (s. 242-262). G. Hellmann, A. Fahrmeir, Μ. Vee (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jönsson, Ch. (2018). International Relations Theory and Diplomacy. W: The encyclopedia of diplomacy, vol. 19 ( s.1-16). G. Martel (red.). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Bibliografia 281
Jönsson, Ch., Hall, M. (2005). Essence of diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Jørgensen, K. E., Aarstad, A. K., Drieskens, E., Laatikainen, К., Tonra, В. (red.). (2015). The SAGE handbook ofEuropean foreign policy: Two volume set. Lon don: SAGE. Kant, I. (1957). Krytyka czystego rozumu. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Kelley, J.R. (2014). Agency Change. Diplomatic Action Beyond the State. Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Kelly, C. (2004). Remembering the Manhattan Project perspectives on the making of the atomic bomb and its legacy. New York: World Scientific. Keskitalo, E.C.H. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic. The construction ofan international region. New York: Routledge. Kharitonova, E., Prokhorenko, I. (2020). Russian Science Diplomacy. W: Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution andPractice (s. 133-146). A. A. Velikaya, G. Simons (red.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Klebelsberg, K. (1927). Neonacionalizmus. Budapest: Atheneum. Kochanowski, J. (1997).Węgry od ugody do ugody. Warszawa: Trio. Koops, J. A., Macaj, G. (red.). (2015). The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Korppoo, A., Tynkkynen, N., Hönneland, G. (2015). Russia and the Politics of International Environmental Regimes: Environmental Encounters or Foreign Policy? Edward Elgar Pubishing. Krasnyak, O. (2018). National Styles in Science, Diplomacy, and Science Diplo macy. Leiden: Brill. Krige, J. (red.). (1996). History of CERN. Burligton: Elsvier. Krige, J., Guzzetti, L. (red.). (1997). History ofEuropean scientific and technologi cal cooperation.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Kubiak, K. (2012). Epizody „wojny o pogodę”. Niemieckie załogowe stacje mete orologiczne w Arktyce: 1941-1945. Zabrze, Tarnowskie Góry: Wydawnictwo Inforteditions. Laakkonen, S., Räsänen, T. (2016). Science Diplomacy in the Baltic Sea Region : Beginnings of East-West Cooperation in Marine Protection during the Cold War. Helsinki: Aleksanteri Instituutti. Lane, Ph. (2013). French Scientific and Cultural Diplomacy. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Ławecka, D. (2000). Wstęp do archeologii. Warszawa: Instytut Archeologii UW. Leach, J. (2015). The Role of Science Communication in International Diplomacy. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 155-169). L.S. Davis, R.G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Lindroos, P., Musial, K. (2914). Dimensions of educational and research co-operation in the Baltic Sea Region. W: Political State of the Region Report (s. 47-52). B. Hen ningsen, Etzold T, Opitz Ch. (red.). Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum. 282 «^ Bibliografia
Łoś-Nowak T. (2006). Stosunki międzynarodowe. Teorie - systemy - uczestnicy, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Łoś-Nowak T. (2013). Polityka zagraniczna - stałe i zmienne komponenty procesu formułowania ireatizacji. W: Polityka zagraniczna. Aktorzy, potencjały, strategie (s. 42-61). T. Łoś-Nowak T (red.). Warszawa: Poltext. Łoś-Nowak T. (red.). (2009). Organizacje w stosunkach międzynarodowych. Istota - mechanizmy działania - zasięg. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Łuszczuk, Μ. (2015). Ewolucja ról międzynarodowych w Arktyce. Lublin: Wydaw nictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Łuszczuk, Μ. (red.). (2013). Arktyka na początku XXI wieku. Między współpracą a rywalizacją. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Łuszczuk, Μ., Graczyk, P., Stępień, A., Śmieszek, Μ. (2015): Cele i narzędzia polskiej polityki arktycznej. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicz nych RP. Marzęda-Mlynarska, K. (2014). Globalne zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem żywno ściowym na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Mathiason J. (2011). International Secretariats: Diplomats of Civil Servants? W: The New Dynamics ofMultilateralism: Diplomacy, International Organizations and Global Governance (s. 237-248). J.P. Muldoon, J.F. Aviel, R. Reitano, E. Sullivan (red.). Boulder: Westview Press. McCannon, J. (2012). A history of the Arctic. Nature, exploration and exploitation. London: Reaktion Books. McNeese, T. (2013). U.S. Constitution. Miejsce wydania nieznane: Lorenz Edu cational Press. Melissen J. (red.).
(2005). The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Melissen, J. (2005). Wielding Soft Power: The New Public Diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”. Milkoreit, Μ. (2015). Science and Climate Change Diplomacy: Cognitive Limits and the Need to Reinvent Science Communication. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 110-139). L.S. Davis, R. G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Minas, S., Ntousas, V. (red.). (2019). EU Climate Diplomacy: Politics, law and negotiations. London: Routledge. Missiroli, A. (red.). (2016). The EU and the world: Players and policies post-Lisbon: a handbook. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Mitrany D., (1975). The Functional Theory of Politics. London: New York: St. Martin’s Press. Monkiewicz, G., Monkiewicz, J. Ruszkiewicz, J. (1989). Zagraniczna polityka naukowo-techniczna w Polsce. Diagnoza, uwarunkowania, kierunki. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Bibliografia ֊^ 283
Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, В., Vanslembrouck S. (2007). A new dealfor an effective European research policy: The design and impacts of the 7th Framework Programme. Dordrecht: Springer. Mūšiai, K. (2002). Education, Research and the Baltic Sea Region-building. W: Approaching Knowledge Society in the Baltic Sea Region (s. 41-58). K. Musia! (red.). Gdańsk and Berlin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Nordeu ropa-Institut der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Musia!, К. (2006). Regional universities in the Baltic Sea region: higher education and regional development. W: Higher Education and National Development: Universities and Societies in Transition (s. 120-132). D. Bridges (red.). Lon don: Routledge. Musial, K., Schumacher, T. (2018). Scientific Excellence: Joint Potentials in the Baltic Sea Region - an explorative study. Hamburg: Baltic Science Network. Nagy, Z. (2017). Great Expectations and Interwar Realities: Hungarian Cultural Diplomacy. Budapest: CEU Press. National Research Council (2002). Knowledge and Diplomacy. Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington DC: The National Academy Press. Neumann, I.B., Leira, H. (JBYÌ). International Diplomacy. Vol. 3: The Plurálisadon of Diplomacy-Changing Actors, Developing Arenas and New Issues. London: Sage. Nikodemus, О., Kļaviņš, Μ., Krišjāne, Z., Zelčs, V. S., (2018). Latvija: zeme, daba, tauta, valsts. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskais apgāds. Nilsson, A.E. (2007). A changing Arctic climate. Science and policy in the Arctic climate impact assessment.
Linköping: Linköping University. Nilsson, A.E. (2016). A Changing Arctic Climate: More than Just Weather. W: Legacies and change in polar sciences. Historical, legal and political reflections on the Inter national Polar Year (s. 9-33). Μ. Tennberg, J.M. Shadian (red.). London: Routledge. Noortmann Μ., Reinisch A., Ryngaert C. (red.). (2015). Non-state actors in Inter national law. London: Hart Publishing. North, Μ. (2016). The Baltic: A History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Nye, J.S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. Nye, J.S. (2004). Power in the Global Information Age. From Realism to Globali zation. New York: Routledge. Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. Nye, J.S., Keohane, R.O. (ZUM). Power and interdependence. New York: Longman. Ociepka В. (2013). Miękka sila i dyplomacja publiczna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnic two Naukowe Scholar. OECD/FAO (2016). International Regulatory Co-operation and International Organisations: The Case of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Paris, Rome: OECD/FAO Pamment, J. (2016). British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. Diplomatic Influence and the Digital Revolution. Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. 284 Bibliografia
Pasierbiak, P. (2008). Miejsce Unii Europejskiej w zagranicznej ekspansji gospo darczej Japonii. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag. Penca, J. (2018). The Rhetoric of ‘Science Diplomacy’: Innovation for the EU’s Scientific Cooperation. The EL-CSID Working Paper. Issue 2018/16. Peterson, J., Sharp, Μ. (1998). Technology policy in the European Union. Basing stoke: Macmillan. Pietraś, Μ. (2007). Procesy globalizacji. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 572-574). Μ. Pietraś (red.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pietraś, Μ., (2007). Organizacje międzynarodowe. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 92-105). Μ. Pietraś (red.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pietraś, ZJ. (1986). Podstawy teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Lublin: Wydaw nictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pisarska, K. (2016). The Domestic Dimension of Public Diplomacy - Evaluating Success through Civil Engagement. London: Palgrave McMillan. Popiuk-Rysińska L, (1994). Uczestnicy stosunków międzynarodowych, ich interesy i oddziaływanie. W: Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza, struktura, funkcjo nowania (s 83-101). E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar (red.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2010b). The European Research Area ‘goes global’: an introduc tion. W: International science and technology cooperation in a globalized world՛. The external dimension of the European research area (s. 1-30). H. PrangeGstöhl (red.).
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2018). The External Engagement of the European Union in Science and Research: Towards EU Science Diplomacy? W: The Euro pean Union’s evolving external engagement՛. Towards new sectoral diplo macies? (s. 153-173). C. Damro, S. Gsteohl, S. Schunz (red.). London: Routledge. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (red). (2010a). International science and technology cooperation in a globalized world: The external dimension of the European research area. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Rana, K. S. (2011). 21st Century Diplomacy. A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. Regeringskansliet (red.). (2018). En strategisk agenda för internationalisering: delbetänkande. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik. Reid-Henry, S. (2019). Empire of Democracy: The Remaking of the West since the Cold War, 1971-2017. New York: Simon Schuster. Reinalda В., (1998). Organization theory and the autonomy of the International Labour Organization. Two classic studies still going strong. W: Autonomous Policy Making in International Organizations (s. 42-61). B. Reinalda, В. Verbeek (red.). London - New York: Routledge. Bibliografia -^ 285
Reinalda, V., Verbeek, В. (2004). The Issue ofDecision Making within International Organizations. N Decision-Making within International Organizations (s. 9-41). B. Reinalda, В. Verbeek (red.). London: Routledge. Rogne, О., Corell, R.W., Kotlyakov, V.M. (2015). Initiation of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). W: IASC after 25 years. 25 years of international arctic research cooperation (s. 9-20). O. Rogne, V. Rachold, L. Hacquebord, R. Corell (red.). Potsdam: International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). Rosenau, J.N. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Con tinuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rostoks, T. (2010). Securitization and insecure societies. W: Rethinking security (s. 62-88). Ž. Ozoliņa (red.). Rīga: Zinātne. RS i AAAS (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. Navigating the changing balance ofpower. RS Policy Document 01/10. London: Royal Society and Ame rican Association for the Advancement in Science. Ruffini, P.-B. (2017). Science and diplomacy: A new dimension of international relations. Cham: Springer. Rumford, C. (2013). The SAGE handbook of European studies. Boston: SAGE. Satow, E. (2011). A Guide to Diplomatic Practice, vol II. Diplomatic Agents. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press. Schölte, J.A. (2008). From Government to Governance: Transition to a New Diploma cy. W: Global Governance and Diplomacy. Worlds Apart? (s. 39-62). A.F. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley (red.). Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cam
bridge University Press. Sharp, P. (2016). Domestic Public Diplomacy, Domestic Diplomacy, and Domestic Foreign Policy. W: The Transformation of Foreign Policy. Drawing and Mana ging Boundaries From Antiquity to the Present (s. 263-284). G. Hellmann, A. Fahrmeir, M. Vec (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shaw J., (2007). World Food Security. History since 1945. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmilan. Skolnikoff, E.B. (1993). The Elusive Transformation. Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Smigerska-Belczak, I. (2012). Instytucjonalizacja stosunków międzynarodowych w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego. Toruń: Mado. Smith, Μ., Keukeleire, S., Vanhoonacker, S. (Eds.). (2017). The diplomatic system of the European Union: Evolution, change and challenges. London: Routledge. Spence, D., Batora, J. (red.). (2015). The European External Action Service: Euro pean Diplomacy Post-Westphalia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Strange, Ց. (2015). States and Markets. XXX: Bloomsbury Revelations. Bloomsbury Academics. Sundararaman, S. (2008). Research Institutes as Diplomatic Actors. W: Global Gov ernance and Diplomacy. Worlds Apart? (s. 118-131). A.F. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley (red.). Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. 286 Bibliografia
Surmacz, В. (¿015). Ewolucja współczesnej dyplomacji: Aktorzy, struktury, funkcje. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Surmacz, B. (red.). (2013a). Nowe oblicza dyplomacji. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uni wersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Surmacz, B. (2013b). Tendencja ewolucji współczesnej dyplomacji. W: Poziomy analizy stosunków międzynarodowych (s. 233-253). E. Haliżak, Μ. Pietraś (red.). Warszawa: PTSM, Wydawnictwo Rambler. Svunfeldt, C. (2009). A European Research Area built by the Member States? W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 44-63). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Szkarłat, Μ. (2011). Żywność genetycznie zmodyfikowana w stosunkach między narodowych. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Taliaferro J. W, Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M. (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. W: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Pol icy (s. 1-42). S.E. Lobell, N.M., Ripsman, J.W., Taliaferro (red.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tassinari, F. (2004). Mare Europaeum: Baltic Sea Region Security and Coopera tion from Post-Wall to Post-Enlargement Europe. Copenhagen: Department of Political Science. Tennberg, Μ. (2000). Arctic environmental cooperation. A study in governmentality. Aidershot: Ashgate. Tenzer, N. (2020). International Expertise and the Diplomacy ofInfluence. W: Global Diplomacy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (s. 297-305). T. Balzacq, F. Charillon, F. Ramel (red.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tindemans, P. (2009). Post-war research, education and innovation policy-making in Europe. W. European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmen tation? (s. 3-23). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Turekian, V. C., Macindoe, S., Copeland, D., Davis, L.S., Patman, R.G., Pozza, Μ. (2015). The Emergence of Science Diplomacy. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn? (s. 3-24). Լ.Ց. Davis, R.G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Umińska-WoronieckaA. (2013). Instytuty polskie. Zmiany modelowe w funkcjonowa niu polskiej dyplomacji kulturalnej w latach 1998-2011. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Umińska-Woroniecka W. (2018). Polityka zagraniczna - podejścia teoretyczne. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 157-174). Ł. Fijałkowski, R. Kunert-Milcarz (red.). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Urbańczyk, P. (2004). Zdobywcy północnego Atlantyku. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. VanDeveer, S. D. (2004). Ordering Environments: Regions in European Interna tional Environmental Cooperation. W: Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (s. 309-334). S. Jasanoff, Μ. Long Martello (red). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Bibliografia -^ 287
Veiner, H. A. (1989). Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.^: Com prehensive Security for the Baltic: an Environmental Approach (s. 75-80). A.H. Westing (red.). London: Sage Publications. Vesa, U. J. (1989). Political security in the Baltic region. W: Comprehensive Security for the Baltic: an Environmental Approach (s. 35-45). A.H. Westing (red.). London: SAGE Publications. Wæver, О. (1997). The Baltic Sea: A Region after Post-Modernity? N: Neo-Nation alism or Regionality? (s. 293-342). P. Joenniemi (red.). Stockholm: Nordiska institutet för regionalpolitisk forskning Williams, L.-K. (2007). Zur Konstruktion einer Region: die Entstehung der Ostseeko operation zwischen 1988 und 1992. Berlin: BWV, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Wiseman, G. (1999). “Polylateralism” and New Modes of Global Dialogue. Discus sion Paper 59. Leicester: Leicester Diplomatic Studies Programme. Wojciuk, A. (2016). Imperia wiedzy. Edukacja i nauka jako czynniki sily państw na arenie międzynarodowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. World Economic Forum (WEF), (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: WEF Young, O. R. (1992, draft): The Political Dynamics of International Regions: The Arctic as a Multiple Use-Region. Young, О.R., Cherkasov, A.L (1992). International Co-operation in the Arctic: Opportunities and Constraints. W: Arctic Alternatives. Civility or Militarism in the Circumpolar North (s. 10-25). F. Griffiths. Toronto: Science for Peace. Zaheer, B. (1996). The Science ofEmpire : Scientific Knowledge, Civilization, and Colonial Rule in India. New York: State
University of New York Press. Zenderowski, R. (2AW). Religia i stosunki międzynarodowe. W: Stosunki międzyna rodowe. Wokół zagadnień teoretycznych (s. 131-166). K. Kącka (red.). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Artykuły Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, International Organization, 58, 239-275. Ackers, L. (2005). Promoting Scientific Mobility And Balanced Growth In The European Research Area, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 18, 301-317. Adler-Nissen, R., Kropp, K. (2015). A Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Euro pean Integration: Four Analytical Principles, Journal ofEuropean Integration, 37, 155-173. Aggestam, K., Towns, A. (2019). The gender turn in diplomacy: a new research agenda, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(1), 9-28. 288 -^ Bibliografia
Alberton, M. (2012). Environmental Protection in the EU Member States: Changing Institutional Scenarios and Trends, L’Europe En Formation, 363, 287-300. Alexander, L. Μ. (1977). Regional Arrangements in the Oceans, The American Journal of International Law, 71, 84-109. Alic, J.A. (2008). A weakness in diffusion: US technology and science policy after World War II, Technology in Society, 30(1), 17-29. Altbach, P.G. (1998). Comparative Perspectives on Higher Education for the Twen ty-first Century, Higher Education Policy, 11(4), 347-356. Arsenault, A. and Cowan, G. (2008). Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Colla boration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(3), 10-30. Banchoff, T. (2002). Institutions, Inertia and European Union Research Policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 1-21. Barnett, M.N., Finnemore Μ., (1999). The Politics, Power and Pathologies of Inter national Organizations, International Organization, 53(4), 699-732. Bellamy, C. and Weinberg, A. (2008). Educational and cultural exchanges to restore America’s image, The Washington Quarterly, 31(3), 55-68. Ben-David, J. (1980). U.S. Science in International Perspective, Scientometrics, 2(5-6), 411-421. Berkman, P.A., Kullerud, L., Pope, A., Vylegzhanin, A.N., Young, O.R. (2017). The Arctic Science Agreement propels science diplomacy, Science, 358(6363), 596-598. Berkman, P.A., Young, O.R. (2009). Governance and Environmental Change in the Arctic Ocean, Science, 324(5925), 339-340. Biechi, F. (2013). Information exchanges,
diplomatic networks and the construction of European knowledge in European Union foreign policy, Cooperation and Conflict, 49, 239-259. Biechi, F., Bremberg, N. (2016). European diplomatie practices: contemporary challenges and innovative approaches, European Security, 25, 391-406. Boczek, В. A. (1978). International Protection of the Baltic Sea Environment Against Pollution: A Study in Marine Regionalism, The American Journal of Interna tional Law, TL, 782-814. Breschi, S., Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European Research Area: emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes, International Journal of Technology Management, 2Л, 747-772. Byers, Μ. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: an Arctic case study, Inter national Relations, 31(4), 375-402. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization, Government and Opposition, 32, 251-274. Chalecki, E.L. (2008). Knowledge in Sheep’s Clothing. How Science Informs American Diplomacy, Diplomacy Statecraft, 19 (1), 1-19. Cini, Μ. (2006). The ‘State of the Art’ in EU Studies: From Politics to Interdisci plinarity (and Back Again?), Politics, 26, 38-46. Bibliografia -^ 289
Colglazier, E.W. (2017). Optimism, Pessimism, and Science Diplomacy. Science Diplomacy 6(2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/optimism_pessimism_sciencediplomacy_june_2017.pdf (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Constantelou, A., Tsakanikas, A., Caloghirou, Y. (2004). Inter-country technological linkages in European Framework Programmes: a spur to European integration?, International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 773-790. Cross, M.’a. K. D. (2016). The EU Global Strategy and diplomacy, Contemporary Security Policy, 37, 402-413. Debarbieux, B., Balsiger, J., Djordjevic, D., Gaberell, S., Rudaz, G. (2014). Scientific collectives in region-building processes, Environmental Science Policy, 42, 149-159. Doel, R,E., Friedman, R.Μ., Lajus, J., Soriin, S., Wråkberg, U. (2014). Strategic Arctic science. National interests in building natural knowledge - interwar era through the Cold War, Journal of Historical Geography, 44, 60-80. Elera, A. de. (2006). The European Research Area: On the Way Towards a European Scientific Community?, European Law Journal, 12, 559-574. Fedoroff, N. V. (2009). Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Cell, 136, 9-11. Fleming, A.H., Pyenson, N. D. (2017). How to Produce Translational Research to Guide Arctic Policy, BioScience, 67 (6), 490-493. Flink, T., Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches, Science and Public Policy, 37 (9), 665-677. Fogarty International Center (2015). US-China renew commitment to global health security, Global Health
Matters, 14 (4), 1. Galsworthy, Μ., McKee, Μ. (2013). Europe’s ‘Horizon 2020’ science funding pro gramme: how is it shaping up?, Journal of health services research policy, 18 (3), 182-185. Gänzle, S. (2017). Macro-regional strategies of the European Union (EU) and experimentalist design of multi-level governance: the case of the EU strategy for the Danube region, Regional Federal Studies, 27, 1-22. Giannopoulos, G. A. (2017). Strategic management and promotion issues in inter national research cooperation, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5, 9-21. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 55-77. Goodsite, M.E., Bertelsen, R.G., Cassotta Pertoldi-Bianchi, S., Ren, J., van der Watt, L-M, Johannsson, H. (2016). The role of science diplomacy. A historical development and international legal framework of arctic research stations under conditions of climate change, post-cold war geopolitics and globalization/power transition, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6 (4), 645-661. Gusmão, R. (2001). Research networks as a means of European integration. Tech nology in Society, 23, 383-393. Harrington, C. (2016). The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene. Millennium, 44 (3), 478-498. 290 ·* Bibliografia
Hettne, В., Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the Rise of Regionness, New Political Economy, 5, 457-472. Hjorth, R. (1994). Baltic Sea Environmental Cooperation: The Role of Epistemic Communities and the Politics of Regime Change, Cooperation and Conflict, 29, 11-31. Hocking, B. (1997/8). The end(s) of diplomacy, International Journal, 53 (1), 169-172. Hoekman, J., Scherngell, T, Frenken, К., Tijssen, R. (2013). Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration, Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 23-52. Höne, K. E., Kurbalija, J. (2018). Accelerating Basic Science in an Intergovernmental Framework: Learning from CERN’s Science Diplomacy, Global Policy, 9, 67-72. Kaijser, A., Larsson Heidenblad, D. (2018). Young Activists in Muddy Boots, Scan dinavian Journal of History, 43, 301-323. Kaltofen, C., Acuto, Μ. (2018). Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem. Global Policy 9 (3), 8-14. Kennedy, J.V. (2012). The Sources and Uses of U.S. Science Funding, The New Atlantis, 36, 3-22. Keohane R.O., Nye J.S., (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction, International Organization, 25 (3), 329-349. Kim, J., Yoo, J. (2019). Science and Technology Policy Research in the EU: From Framework Programme to HORIZON 2020, Social Sciences, 8, 153. Koivurova, T. (2010). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance, Polar Record, 46 (2), 146-156. Leese, Μ. (2018). Between a Carrot and a Stick: Science Diplomacy and Access to EU Research Funding, Global Policy, 9,
48-52. Leese, Μ. (2018). Between a Carrot and a Stick: Science Diplomacy and Access to EU Research Funding, Global Policy, 9 (3), 48-52. Legrand, T., Stone, D. (2008) Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact, British Politics, 13, s. 392-408. Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the Future of Innovation Diplomacy, European Journal of Futures Research, 5 (20), 1-13. Liu, H. (2018). Influence of the Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation on the approach of non-Arctic states to Arctic scientific activities, Advances in Polar Science, 29 (1), 51-60. López de San Roman, A., Schunz, S. (2017). Understanding European Union Science Diplomacy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56 (2), 247-266. Loukacheva, N. (2020). Law in the Canadian North, Norther Review, 50, 109-135. Luszczuk, Μ. (2017). Dyplomacja naukowa jako forma współpracy i rywalizacji w Arktyce, Teka Politologii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych PAN, 12 (2), 193-216. Łuszczuk, Μ., Padrtova, В., Szczerbowicz, W. (2020). Political dimension of Arctic research, Oceanologia, [w druku]. Machowski, J. (1993). IASC as legal framework of international scientific cooperation in Arctic, Polish Polar Journal, 14 (2), 177-207. Bibliografia ·«»- 291
Makarychev, A., Sergunin, A. (2017). Russia’s role in regional cooperation and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), Journal ofBaltic Studies, 48,465-479. Makkonen, T., Mitze, T. (2016). Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?, Scientometrics, 106, 1193-1215. Mazur, G. (2018). Umowa o partnerstwie gospodarczym Unia Europejska-Japonia - nowy rozdział w dwustronnych stosunkach handlowych. Unia Europejska, pl, 2 (249), 3-18. Mazur, G. (2016). Interesy ofensywne unijnych przedsiębiorstw w kontekście nego cjowanej umowy o strefie wolnego handlu UE-Japonia. Unia Europejska.pl, 3 (238), 6-18. Melchiorre, T. (2015). The protection of the sea as a cooperation area case in the Baltic Sea region, Regions and Cohesion, 5, 109-136. Misa, T. J., Schot, J. (2005). Inventing Europe: Technology and the hidden inte gration of Europe, History and Technology, 21, 1-19. Moisio, S., Leppänen, L. (2007). Towards a Nordic competition state? Politicoeconomic transformation of statehood in Finland, 1965-2005, Fennia - Inter nationaljournal of Geography, 185, 63-87. Moomaw, W.R. (2018). Scientist Diplomats or Diplomat Scientists: Who Makes Science Diplomacy Effective?, Global Policy, 9 (3), 78-80. Murray, S. (2012). The Renaissance of Diplomatic Theory. International Politics Quarterly, 33 (4), 23-39. Murray, S. (2008). Consolidating the Gains Made in Diplomacy Studies: A taxo nomy, International Studies Perspectives, 9 (1), 22-39. Musia!, K. (2003). Østersøregionen og videnssamfundets udfordringer,. Vindue
mod øst, 2, 31-36. Mūšiai, K., Šime, Z. (2020). How to build legitimacy of regional integration on rational foundations - a case of epistemic communities in the Baltic Sea area. Journal of Baltic Studies, w druku. Nagy, N. (2007). A Konstantinápolyi Magyar Tudományos Intézet története (19161918), Mediterrán és Balkán fórum. 1 (2), s. 2-7. Nagy-Darvas, J. (1997). Private Higher Education in Hungary, International Higher Education, 9, s.6-8. Nedeva, Μ. (2013). Between the global and the national: Organising European science, Research Policy, 42, 220-230. Nedeva, Μ., Stampfer, M. (2012). Science policy. From “science in Europe” to “European science”, Science, 336, 982-983. Neureiter, P. N. (1965). U.S.-Japan Cooperative Science Program, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists -ajournai of Science and Public Affairs, 21(1), 39. Nicholas, R. W. (2015). Why Diplomacy and Science Need Each Other, Foreign Affairs, June. Nitoiu, C., Sus, Μ. (2019). Introduction: strategy in EU foreign policy, International Politics, 56, 259-271. 292 ·*»· Bibliografia
Nőssel, S. (2004). Smart Power, Foreign Affairs, 83 (2), 131-142. Nye, J. S. Jr. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94-109. Palfreyman, D. (2007). Is academic freedom under threat in UK and US higher education?, Education and the Law, 19 (1), 19-40. Papon, P. (2004). European Scientific Cooperation and Research Infrastructures: Past Tendencies and Future Prospects, Minerva, 42, 61-76. Patman, R.G., Davis, L.S. (2017). Science Diplomacy in the Indo Pacific Region: A Mixed but Promising Experience, Politics Policy, 45 (5), 862-878. Piekut, Μ. (2012). Nakłady na działalność badawczo-rozwojową w krajach europej skich, Stanach Zjednoczonych oraz Japonii, Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w War szawie Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, 98, 135-151. Pisarska K. (2015). The role of domestic public engagement in the formulation and implementation of US government-sponsored educational exchanges: An insider’s account, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 11(1), 5-17. Pusztai, G. (2008). The Bologna Process in Hungary, European Education, 40 (2), 85-102. Rana, Kishan S. (2011). 21st Century Diplomacy. A Practitioner’s Guide. The Continuum International Publishing Group. Räsänen, T., Laakkonen, S. (2007). Cold War and the Environment: The Role of Finland in International Environmental Politics in the Baltic Sea Region, Ambio, 26, 229-236. Rathbun, B. (2008). A Rose by Any Other Name: Ne-oclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism, Security Studies, 17, 294-321.
Rittberger, B., Blauberger, Μ. (2018). Introducing the debate section: ‘The EU in crisis: EU studies in crisis?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 436-439. Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World Poli tics, 51(1), 144-172. Rossow, R. (1962). The Professionalization of the New Diplomacy, World Politics, 14 (4), 561-575. Rothkopf, DJ. (1998). Cyberpolitik: The Changing Nature of Power in the Infor mation Age, Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 22-46. Rüffin, N. (2020). EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level gover nance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action, Research Policy, 49 (1), article 103842. Ruffini, P-B. (2018). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Science-Diplomacy Nexus, Global Policy, 9 (3), ТЪ—П. Rumford, C., Murray, P. (2003). Globalization and the Limitations of European Integration Studies: Interdisciplinary Considerations, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 11, 85-93. Ryan, L. (2015). Governance of EU research policy: Charting forms of scientific democracy in the European Research Area, Science and Public Policy, 42, 300-314. Bibliografia 293
Rytövuori, H. (1980). Structures of Détente and Ecological Interdependence: Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Area for the Protection of Marine Environment and Living Resources, Cooperation and Conflict, 15, 85-102. Sauerland, К. (2006). Idea uniwersytetu - aktualność tradycji Humboldta?, Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2 (28), 89-96. Schlegel, F., Jacot, O., Fetscherin, Μ. (2011). Science diplomacy with swissnex China: A Swiss nation brand initiative, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Ί, 289-298. Schweller R.L. (2004). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of under balancing, International Security, 29 (2), 159-201. Scott, J. W. (2002). Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation, Journal of Baltic Studies, 33, 137-155. Shibata, A., Raita, Μ. (2016). An Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation: Only for the Eight Arctic States and Their Scientists? The Yearbook of Polar Law Online, 8 (1), 129-162. Simangan, D. (2020). Where is the Anthropocene? IR in a new geological epoch, International Affairs, 96 (1), 211-224. Sime, Z., Legzdiņš, Μ. (2018). Research and Higher Education Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region, Latvijas Intereses Eiropas Savienībā, 1, 45-65. Śmieszek, M. (2015). 25 Years of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC), Arctic Yearbook, 5, 437-444. Śmieszek, Μ. (2017). The Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation: From Paper to Practice, Arctic Yearbook, 6, 439-445. Starzyk-Sulejewska, J., (2016). Stosunki Unii Europejskiej z Organizacją Narodów Zjednoczonych
do spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa, Stosunki Międzynarodowe, 4 (52), 91-109. Stein, J. A., Ahmed, A. (2007). The European Union as a Model of International Co-operation in Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 654-669. Steiner, B.H. (2004). Diplomacy and international theory, Review of International Studies, 30 (4), 493-509. Su, P., Mayer, Μ., (2018). Science Diplomacy and Trust Building: ‘Science China’ in the Arctic, Global Policy, 9 (3), 23-28. Sundin, B. (2005). Nature as heritage: the Swedish case, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11, 9-20. Sutcu, G. (2012). Evolution of diplomacy and the future of epistemic communities: scientists as the diplomats of the 21st century, European Scientific Journal, 26 (8), 240-259. Szkarłat Μ. (2020). Science diplomacy of Poland, Humanities and Social Science Communications, Ί, article number 59 (2020). Tassinari, F. (2005). The European sea: Lessons from the Baltic Sea region for security and cooperation in the European neighborhood, Journal of Baltic Studies, 36, 387-407. 294 -e- Bibliografia
Tesar, C., Dubois, M-А., Shestakov, A. (2016). Toward strategic, coherent, policy relevant arctic science, Science, 353 (6306), 1368-1370. Toivanen, H., Suominen, A. (2015). Epistemic integration of the European Rese arch Area: The shifting geography of the knowledge base of Finnish research, 1995-2010, Science and Public Policy, 42, 549-566. VanDeveer, S. D., Dabelko, G. D. (1999). Redefining security around the Baltic: environmental issues in regional context, Global Governance, 5, 221-249. Varela-Vazquez, P., González-López, Μ., del Carmen Sánchez-Carreira, Μ. (2019). The uneven regional distribution of projects funded by the EU Framework Pro grammes, Journal ofEntrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15,45-72. Wade, N. (1974). Kissinger on Science: Making the Linkage with Diplomacy, Sci ence, 184 (4138), 780-781. Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited, Public Relations Review, 32 (2), 91-6. Weingartner, K.A., Orttung, R.W. (2019). US Arctic policymaking under Trump and Obama, Polar Record, 55 (6), 402-410. Weiss, Ch. (2015). How Do Science and Technology Affect International Affairs?, Minerva 53, 411-430. Wohlforth, W.C. (1994/5). Realism and the End of the Cold War, International Security, 19 (3), 97-98. Yakushiji, T. (2009). The Potential of Science and Technology Diplomacy, AsiaPacific Review, 16(1), 1-7. Materiały internetowe Andreev, A. (2007). To What Extent Are International Organizations Autonomous Actors in World Politics?, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/opticonl826/archive/issue2/
VfPS_HS_International_Organisations.pdf (dostęp: 5.04. 2020). Arctic Council (1996). Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council. Joint Communique of the Governments of the Arctic Countries on the Establishment of the Arctic Council. Ottawa, Canada, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/ bitstream/handle/11374/85/EDOCS-1752-v2-ACMMCAOO_Ottawa_1996_Founding_Declaration.PDF?sequence=5 isAllowed=y (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2013). Arctic Council Rules of Procedure, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/940/2015-09-01_Rules_of_Procedure_ website_version.pdf?sequence=7 isAllowed=y (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2016). Task Force on Scientific Cooperation meets in Ottawa, https:// arctic-council.org/en/news/task-force-on-scientific-cooperation-meets-in-ottawa/, (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2017). Arctic Council Ministers meet, sign binding agreement on sci ence cooperation, pass Chairmanship from U.S. to Finland, https://arctic-council. Bibliografia -^ 295
org/en/news/arctic-council-ministers-meet-sign-binding-agreement-on-science-cooperation-pass-chairmanship-from-u.s-to-finland/, (dostęp: 5.04.2019). Arctic Council (2020). Observers, https://arctic-council.org/en/about/observers/, (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). ARWU (2WS). Academic Ranking of World Universities, http://www.shanghairanking.com (dostęp: 17.07.2018). ASM2 (2018). Report of the 2nd Arctic Science Ministerial: Co-Operation in Arctic Science - Challenges and Joint Actions, https://www.arcticscienceministerial. org/files/190402_ASM2_Bericht_V2_bf.pdf (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Berkman, P.A. (2014). Stability and Peace in the Arctic Ocean through Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy 3 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/stability_and_peace_in_the_arctic_ocean_through_science_diplomacy_science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 18.04.2018). Bindenagel Sehovič, A., (2018). Food Fights for Life: Food diplomacy forfood security, Proceedings of the 12th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection (IWCSPP) in Berlin, Germany, October 7-11, 2018, nr 463, https:// ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/10602/9671 (dostęp: 1.08.2020). Brandt, N. (2018). Strengthening innovation in Poland. OECD Economics Depart ment Working Papers. No. 1479, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ abf2c877-en.pdf?expires=1600509426 id=id accname=guest checksum= 6B3943CBAC5CBCAC04C6C86E93F3E72F (dostęp: 18.11.2019). BUP (n.d.). The Baltic University Programme - Uppsala University, Sweden, https://www.balticuniv.uu.se/ (dostęp: 18.07. 2019). Clary, D. C. (2013). A
Scientist in the Foreign Office, Science Diplomacy, 2(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/a_scientist_in_the_foreign_office_science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 18.11. 2015). Colglazier, E.W. (2017). Optimism, Pessimism, and Science Diplomacy. Science Diplomacy 6 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/optimism_pessimism_sciencediplomacy_june_2017.pdf (dostęp: 19.04.2019). Copeland, D. (2011). Science Diplomacy: What’s It All About?, https://www.cips-cepi. ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Copeland-Policy-Brief-Nov-ll-5.pdf (dostęp: 18.09.2019). Cordis (2014). WYZWANIA SPOŁECZNE - Europa w zmieniającym się świecie - integracyjne, innowacyjne i refleksyjne społeczeństwa, https://cordis.europa. eu/programme/id/H2020-EU.3.6./pl (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Cordis (2018). Science diplomacy for EU neighbourhoodpolicies, https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/H2020_ENG-GLOBALLY-04-2017 (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Cornut, J. (2017). The Practice Turn in International Relations Theory. W: Inter national studies Encyclopedia. R. Denemark, R. Marlin-Bennett (red.). New York: Oxford University Press, https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/ view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-113/ version/0?print=pdf (dostęp: 13.04.2020). 296 ^ Bibliografia
Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP) (2008). Toward the Reinforcement of Science and Technology Diplomacy, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/doc/s_ and_t_diplomacy/20080519_tow_the_reinforcement_of.pdf (dostęp: 30.07.2018). Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI) (2015). Brochure about the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation 2015 https://www8.cao.go.jp/ cstp/english/panhu/index.html (dostęp: 30.07.2018). Dąbrowska, A (2019). PiS ogtosil sklad nowego rządu. Jest kilka niespodzianek, Polityka. Available, https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1931454,l,pisoglosil-sklad-nowego-rzadu-jest-kilka-niespodzianek.read (dostęp: 28.12.2019). Dehgan, A., Colglazier, E.W. (2012). Development Science and Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 1(4), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/ files/development_science_and_science_diplomacy_science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2018). Industrial Strategy: building a Britainfitfor the future, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ industrial-strategy-building-a-britain-fit-for-the-future (dostęp: 10.03.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2020a). Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Ministerfor Science, Research and Innovation), https://www. gov.uk/government/ministers/parliamentary-under-secretary-of-state-minister-for-science-research-and-innovation (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2020b). UKResearch and Development Roadmap,
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-research-and-development-roadmap (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Dolan, B. Μ. 2012. Science and Technology Agreements as Tools for Science Diplomacy. A U.S. Case Study. Science Diplomacy 1(4): 1-9, https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/science_and_technology_agreements_ as_tools_for_science_diplomacy_science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2019). ECOSOC (2001). Science and Technology for Development, Resolution 2001/31, https://www.un.org/ecosoc/sites/www.un.org.ecosoc/files/documents/2001/resolution-2001-31.pdf (dostęp: 15.07.2020). EOG (2017). Memorandum of Understanding w sprawie wdrażania Mechanizmu Finansowego EOG na lata 2014-2021, https://www.eog.gov.pl/media/89440/ Zalacznik_2_MoU.pdf (dostęp: 15.08.2019). Euractive.pl (2014). Pierwsze sankcje dla Szwajcarii, https://www.euractiv.pl/section/ polityka-zagraniczna/news/pierwsze-sankcje-dla-szwajcarii/ (dostęp 15.07.2020). European Commission (2005). EU/Russia: The four “Common Spaces, Memo/05/103, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_05_103 (dostęp: 30.12.2019). European Commission (2013). Roadmap for EU -Japan S T Cooperation, https:// ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/pdf/policy/jp_roadmap_2018.pdf (dostęp: 11.10.2019). European Commission (2019). European Innovation Scoreboard 2019, https:// op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/dl56a01b-9307-lle9-936901aa75ed71al/language-en/format-PDF/source-136061387 (dostęp: 15.02.2020). Bibliografia - *· 297
European Commission (2019c). Research, innovation and science policy experts group (RISE), https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/shaping-eu-research-and-innovation-policy/rise-group_en (dostęp: 29.07.2020). European Science Diplomacy Cluster (2020). The European Science Diplomacy Cluster, https://www.science-diplomacy.eu/ (dostęp: 30.07.2020). FAO (2009). Strategic Framework 2010-2019, C 2009/3, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/029/ k5864e01.pdf, (dostęp 20.07.2020). FAO (2Ά 2). FAO Attributes, Core Functions and Comparative Advantages, CL 144/14, Food and Agriculture Organization, http://www.fao.Org/3/md881E01/md881E01. pdf, (dostęp: 1.08.2020). FAO (2013). Reviewed Strategic Framework, C 2013/7, Food and Agriculture Orga nization of the United Nations, Rome, http://www.fao.Org/3/mg015e/mg015e.pdf (dostęp: 1.08.2020). FAO (2018). Transforming Food and Agriculture to Achieve the SDGs. 20 inter connected actions to guide policy-makers, FAO Rome, http://www.fao.Org/3/ I9900EN/i9900en.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2020). FAO (2018a). Meeting: Science diplomacy can improve regional peace while figh ting animal disease, http://www.fao.Org/europe/news/detail-news/en/c/1145566/ (dostęp: 23.08.2020). FAO (2020). Transforming the World through Food and Agriculture. FAO and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, FAO, Rome, http://www.fao.org/3/ ca5299enZca5299en.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2020). FAO (2020a). FAO Worldwide Offices, https://coin.fao.org/cms/do/en/index.html (dostęp: 17.07.2020).
FAO (2020b). FAO Treaties Database, http://www.fao.org/treaties/results/en/?search=adv subj_coll=ArticleXIV, (dostęp: 15.07.2020). FAO (2020d). More scientific research is needs to ensure policies that enable access to healthy diets for all, http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1197433/icode/ (dostęp: 18.08.2020). FAO/WHO (2007/ 2018). FAO/WHO Framework for the Provision of Scientific Advice on food Safety and Nutrition, Rome, Geneva, http://www.fao.org/3/ i7494enZI7494EN.pdf (dostęp: 12.08.2020). Farrell, J. (2017). New Agreement to Enhance International Arctic Scientific Coop eration. ARCUS, https://www.arcus.Org/witness-the-arctic/2017/2/article/27780 , (dostęp: 03.07.2020). Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2018). Written Evidence ֊ Foreign and Com monwealth Office. FPW0027, http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/international-relations-committee/foreign-policy-in-changed-w ’orld-conditions/written/79900.html (dostęp: 13.09.2019). France Diplomatie (2019). Diplomatie scientifique, https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/ fr/politique-etrangere-de-la-france/diplomatie-scientifique/ (dostęp: 03.05.2019). 298 -^ Bibliografia
Frehill, L.M., Seely-Grant, К. (2016). International Research Collaborations: Scien tists Speak about Leveraging Science for Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 5(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/international_research_collaborations_science_diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 05.09.2019). Gluckman, P. (2017). Science Diplomacy - looking towards 2030, IIASA, 45th Anni versary Lecture, Vienna, Austria, https://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/17-1 l-14-Science-diplomacy-looking-towards-2030.pdf (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Gluckman, P.D., Turekian, V., Grimes, R.W., Kishi, T. (2017). Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside, Science Diplomacy, 6 (4), https:// www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/pragmatic_perspective_science_advice_dec2017_l.pdf (dostęp: 27.04.2019) Gorbaczow, Michail (1987). Mikhail Gorbachev’s speech in Murmansk at the cere monial meeting on the occasion of the presentation of the order of Lenin and the gold star to the city of Murmansk, https://www.barentsinfo.fi/docs/Gorbachev_speech.pdf (dostęp: 14.05.2019). Government Office for Science (2013). Future of the civil service: Making the most ofscientists and engineers, URN BIS/13/594ES, http://www.bis.gov.uk/go-science (dostęp: 14.11.2019). Government Office for Science (2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ government-office-for-science#content (dostęp: 03.05.2019). Government Office for Science (2020). Guidance for government Chief Scientific Advisers and their Officials. Chief Scientific Advisers and their officials: an introduction,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/856166/chief-scientific-advisers-and-their-officialsan-introduction.pdf (dostęp: 14.03.2020). Gual Soler, Μ. (2015). How I Became a Science Diplomat, https://slate.com/technology/2015/10/how-i-became-a-science-diplomat.html (dostęp: 14.04.2019). Heine, J. (2006). On the manner ofpractising the new diplomacy. Working paper 1/2006, https://www.cigionline.org/publications/manner-practising-new-diplomacy (dostęp: 4.12.2019). Harvard Medical School (2019). Timeline of Discovery, https://hms.harvard.edu/ about-hms/history-hms/timeline-discovery (dostęp: 27.04.2019). HM Government (2020a). Council for Science and Technology, https://www.gov. uk/government/organisations/council-for-science-and-technology (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government (2020b). Departments, agencies and public bodies, https://www. gov.uk/government/organisations (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government (2020c). Government Office for Science, https://www.gov.uk/ government/organisations/government-office-for-science (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government, Department for Business, E. I. S. (2019). International Research and Innovation Strategy, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/801513/International-research-innovation-strategy-single-page.pdf (dostęp: 23.04.2020). Bibliografia -«֊ 299
Hollanders, H. i in. 1^2020). European Innovation Scoreboard2020, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en (dostęp: 15.04.2020). Holzeis, C.C. i in. (2019). New Models for Science Diplomacy Transcending Boundries: The InterAcademy Partnership Food and Nutrition Security and Agricul ture Project, Science Diplomacy 7(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/canales_may _2019_0.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2020). Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Policy, (2011). Hungary’s Foreign Policy after the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, https://eu.kormany. hu/admin/download/f/lb/30000/foreign_policy _20111219.pdf (dostęp: 24.04.2019). IASC (1990). Founding Articles ofan InternationalArctic Science Committee. IASC, https://iasc.info/images/about/iasc-founding-articles.pdf (dostęp: 02.04.2020). IASC (2020a). Action Groups - International Arctic Science Committee, https://iasc. info/action-groups (dostęp: 16.12.2019). IASC (2020b). The IASC Handbookof Procedures Guidelines. Version: 23 March 2020, https://iasc.info/images/about/organization/IASC_Handbook_20200323. pdf (dostęp: 29.03.2020). IASC-CASP (2018). Communicating Arctic Science to Policy-Makers. Final Report of IASC Action Group, https://www.dropbox.eom/s/7nb93m7ozkmr7yb/A8_ CASP_Final_Report.pdf ?dl=0 (dostęp: 26.11.2019). IISD, (2013). Water Budapest Summit Budapest Water Summit Bulletin, A sum mary report, Vol 82 (27), https://enb.iisd.org/water/bws/html/crsvol82num27e. html (dostęp: 27.09.2020). International Council for Science ISCU (2015). ISCU Review of the
Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, Paris, https://council.science/ wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SDG-Report.pdf (dostęp: 11.04.2020). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (1970). Report of the ICES Working Group on Pollution of the Baltic Sea. ICES Cooperative Research Report, Series A,no., 15, http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/CM%20Doccuments/1976/ Gen/1976_Gen2.pdf (dostęp: 26.04.2020). International Space Station (2017). About the International Space Station, http:// www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/International_ Space_Station/About_the_International_Space_Station (dostęp: 15.03.2019). Irwin, N. (2016). What Was the Greatest Era for Innovation? A Brief Guided Tour, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/upshot/what-wasthe-greatest-era-for-american-innovation-a-brief-guided-tour.html (dostęp: 1.05.2019). Kaiser, R., Prange, H. (2002). A New Concept ofDeepening European Integration? The European Research Area and the Emerging Role of Policy Coordination in a Multi-Level Governance System, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=344320 (dostęp: 14.05.2020). Knight, J. (2018). Knowledge Diplomacy. A Bridge Linking International Higher Education and Research tritìi International Relations. Discussion Paper, https:// www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/kno.pdf (dostęp: 11.10.2019). 300 -^ Bibliografia
Kormany.hu. (2020). Tudománydiplomácia, https://2010-2014.kormany.hu/hu/ kulugyminiszterium/eu-ketoldali-kapcsolatokert-es-kulturalis-diplomaciaer t-felelos-helyettes-allamtitkarsag/felelossegi-teruletek/tudomanydiplomacia (dostęp: 25.09.2020). Komisja Europejska (2015). Science diplomacy for EU neighbourhood policies, https:// ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/ topic-details/eng-globally-04-2017 (dostęp: 30.07.2020). КРК (2018). Aspekty finansowe i prawne w programie Horyzont 2020: Co trzeba wiedzieć, żeby prawidłowo skalkulować budżet, zrealizować i rozliczyćprojekt wH2020, http://www.kpk.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Poradnik-H2020 . pdf (dostęp: 14.07.2020). KPK (2019). Krajowy Punkt Kontaktowy, http://www.kpk.gov.pl/?page_id=21437 (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Krasnyak, O. (2017). The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Ideal Science Diplomacy CPD Blog, https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/apollo-soyuz-test-project-ideal-science-diplomacy (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Krasnyak, O. (2018). National Styles in Science Diplomacy: The U.S.’, CPD Blog, https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/national-styles-science-diplomacy-us (dostęp: 23.05.2020). Kryszewski, W., Pszczolowski, T. (2019). Nauka. Encyklopedia PWN, https:// encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/nauka;3946164.html (dostęp: 09.05.2019). Kryszewski, W., Pszczolowski, T. (2019). Technika. Encyklopedia PWN, https:// encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/technika;3985955.html (dostęp: 09.05. 2019). Łuszczuk, Μ. (2016). Informacja na temat spotkania Ministrów Nauki w spra wie badań arktycznych (Waszyngton, USA, 28
września 2016), Polish Polar Consortium, http://www.pkpolar.pl/konsorcjum/informacja-na-temat-spotkania-ministrow-nauki-w-sprawie-badan-arktycznych-waszyngton-d-c-usa-28wrzesnia-2016/ (dostęp: 23.01.2019). Markusz K. (2Á№). Right-wing groups in Poland say Holocaust conference anti-Polish, The Times of Isreal, 18 February 2019, https://www.timesofisrael.com/right-winggroups-in-poland-say-holocaust-conference-anti-polish/ (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Mauduit, J-C. (2017). Open Skies Policies in Astronomy: The Growing Need for Diplomacy on the Final Frontier, Science Diplomacy, 6(2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/observations_diplomacy_and_the_future_ of_ocean_governance_updated_0.pdf (dostęp: 27.04.2019). МЕТІ (2019). Bilateral Agreements on Cooperation in Science and Technology, and Joint Committees, https://www.meti.go.jp/english/policy/economy/industrial_technology/pdf/0123_04.pdf (dostęp: 20.09.2019). Międzyresortowy zespól ds. promocji Polski za granicą (2018). Marka Polska koncepcja, https://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/a80elcff-2515-449c-8e0e-dc2f59da9al8:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, MNiSW (2020). Partnerzy w edukacji: Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Bibliografia 301
Akademickiej oraz Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji zacieśniają współpra cę, https://www.gov.pl/web/nauka/partnerzy-w-edukacji-ministerstwo-nauki-iszkolnictwa-wyzszego-narodowa-agencja-wymiany-akademickiej-oraz-fundacjarozwoju-systemu-edukacji-zaciesniaja-wspolprace (dostęp: 07.07.2020). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2015). Rządowy program współpracy z Polonią i Polakami za granicą w 1. 2015-2020, https://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/70a7021e-304c-4075-a812-18e5b3410966:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2016). Zarządzenie nr 24Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych z dnia 11 lipea 2016 w sprawie Rady Dyplomacji Historycz nej, http://g.ekspert.infor.pl/p/_dane/akty_pdf/U31/2016/27/32.pdf#zoom=90 (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Kierunki promocji Polski na lata 2017-27, https://msz.gov.p1/resource/4799f322-27f3-4563-a7ce-74bf8a5c88d6:JCR (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Strategia polskiej polityki zagra nicznej na 1. 2017-21, https://msz.gov.pl/resource/978285e3-5684-4fcb-8d7e-d0a8bfdb0fdb:JCR (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Zadania administracji rządowej na l. 2017-18 w ramach realizacji Rządowego programu współpracy z Polonią i Polakami zagranicą w Լ 2015-20, https://msz.gov.pl/resource/c6ae2987-48f84dlf-a39f-874fa5f61467:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). „Polska jest w Tobie” - 250 młodych łudzi z całego świata przyleci do Polski, by poznać kraj przodków, https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/polska-jest-w-
tobie-250-mlodych-ludzi֊zcalego-swiata-przyleci-do-polski-by-poznac-kraj-przodkow (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Ambasada RP w Tokio, https:// tokio.msz.gov.pl/ (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2W)). Ambasada RP w Waszyngtonie, https://waszyngton.msz.gov.pl/pl/ (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Dyplomacja publiczna, https://www. msz.gov.pl/pl/polityka_zagraniczna/dyplomacja_publiczna/ (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Dzień Polonii i Polaków za Gra nicą, https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/dzien-polonii-i-polakow-za-granica (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Internetowa Baza Traktatowa, https://traktaty.msz.gov.pl/umowa-l (dostęp: 09.11.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Międzyresortowy zespól ds. promo cji Polski za granicą, https://www.msz.gov.p1/pl/p/msz_pl/polityka_zagraniczna/ dyplomacja_publiczna/miedzyresportowy_zespol_promocji_polski/ __ rp0x2Content!335370@20954_pageNo/2 (dostęp: 09.11.2019). Moedas, C. (2016). Science Diplomacy in the European Union, Science Diplo macy, 5(1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/science_diplomacy_in_the_european_union_science __ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2020). 302 -^ Bibliografia
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej, NAWA (2018). NAWA, Zarys strategii na lata 2018-2025, https://nawa.gov.pl/images/Strategia-NAWA.pdf (dostęp: 20.06.2020). Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej, NAWA (2019). Doradca ds. Nauki i Technologii Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych, https://nawa.gov.pl/nawa/rada-nawa/sklad-osobowy-rady/360-prof-marek-konarzewski (dostęp: 15.07.2019). Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, NCBiR (2019). Programy międzynarodo we, https://www.ncbr.gov.pl/programy/programy-miedzynarodowe/ (dostęp: 09.11.2019). National Institutes of Health (2019). NIH Research Highlights 2019, https://www. nih.gov/research-training/nih-research-highlightsa (dostęp: 10.11.2019). National Science Board (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018: R D Expenditures and R D Intensity, https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/ report/sections/overview/r-d-expenditures-and-r-d-intensity (dostęp: 10.04.2019). Newton Fund (2020). Newton Fund, http://www.newtonfund.ac.uk/ (dostęp: 18.06.2020). NRDalO, (2020). Hungary cooperating with international research infrastructures and professional organizations, https://nkfih.gov.hu/about-the-office/hungary-cooperating-with (dostęp: 27.09.2020). Payette, J. (2012). Research and Diplomacy 350 Kilometers Above the Earth, Sci ence Diplomacy, 1(4), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ research_and_diplomacy_350_kilometers_above_the_earth_science __ diplomacy, pdf (dostęp: 12.04.2019). Penca, J. (2018). The rhetoric of “science diplomacy”: Innovation for the EU’s scientific cooperation? (EL-CSID Working Paper 16),
https://docs.wixstatic. Com/ugd/0bc3be_e75b3b2ed47a4f7da3534e30d7f5747e.pdf (dostęp: 12.07.2020). PIASt (2019). Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych (PIASt), www.piast.pan. pl (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs History (2019). https://pugwash. org/history/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Rüffin N., Schreiterer U. (2017). Case Study. Science and technology agreements in the toolbox of science diplomacy: Effective instruments or insignificant add ons? EL-CSID Working Paper Issue 2017/6 September 2017, http://aei.pitt. edu/92501/l/EL%2DCSID_WorkingPaper_2017%2D06_Science_and_technology_agreements.pdf (dostęp: 14.11.2019). Ruffini, P-B. (2020). France’s Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 9 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ruffini_june_2020.pdf (dostęp: 03.04.2020). Sato, Y., Hirokazu K., Tateo A. (2014). Building the Foundations for Scientific Advice in the International Context, Science Diplomacy, 3 (3), https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/building_the_foundations_for_scientific_advice_in_the_international_context_science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 12.04.2019). Bibliografia -^ 303
Scotland’s National Academy (2020). The Royal Society ofEdinburgh, https://www. rse.org.uk/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). Sime, Z. (2018). Council of the Baltic Sea States : The Role of a Sustainable and Prosperous Region in Bringing Science Diplomacy Forward (No. 19), https:// docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/7dd3ca_6f7f6a0617764ae2a6f57922e3de0f29.pdf (dostęp: 12.02.2020). Stephen, K. (2016). A Legacy of Science Cooperation for Future Generations: The White House Arctic Science Ministerial, http://www.thearcticinstitute.org/ white-house-arctic-science-ministerial/ (dostęp: 07.06.2020). Sunami, A. (2016). Japan’s Science and Technology Diplomacy. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegie-mec.org/2016/02/10/japan-s-science-and-technology-diplomacy-pub-63476 (dostęp: 23.10.2018). Sunami, A., Hamachi T., Kitaba S. (2013). The Rise of Science and Technology Diplomacy in Japan, Science Diplomacy, 2 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy . org/sites/default/files/the_rise_of_science_and_technology_diplomacy_in_japan_ science__ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 14.08.2019). The Academy of Medical Sciences (2020). The Academy of Medical Sciences, https://acmedsci.ac.uk/about (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The British Academy (2020). About the British Academy, https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Danish Government (2018). New Danish Foreign and Security Policy Strategy 2019-2020, https://um.dk/~/media/um/danish-site/documents/udenrigspolitik/ aktuelle%20emner/udenrigs%20og%20sikkerhedspolitik/2019-20/foreign%20 and%20security%20policy%20strategy%202019-2020.pdf (dostęp:
11.04.2020). The Learned Society of Wales (2020). About the Learned Society of Wales, https:// www.learnedsociety.wales/about-us/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Academy of Engineering (2020). Policy, https://www.raeng.org.uk/policy (dostęp: 23 July 2020). The Royal Irish Academy (2020). About The Royal Irish Academy, https://www. ria.ie/about (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2015). UK research and the European Union. The role of the EU in funding UK research, https://royalsociety.Org/~/media/policy/projects/ eu-uk-funding/uk-membership-of-eu.pdf (dostęp: 18.07.2020). The Royal Society (2018). Submission to the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee Brexit Science and Innovation Summit. The Royal Society (2019a). Royal Society Submission to the Sir Adrian Smith Call for Evidence on Future Frameworks for International Collaboration on Research and Innovation, https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/Publications/2019/31-05-19-royal-society-submission-to-sir-adrian-smith-review.pdf (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2019b). Why the UK Must Associate to Horizon Europe, https:// royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2019/why-the-uk-must-associate-tohorizon-europe/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). 304 ^ Bibliografia
The Royal Society (2020a). About the Royal Society, https://royalsociety.org/aboutus/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2020b). Policy Associate Scheme, https://royalsociety.org/grantsschemes-awards/policy-secondment-programme/ (dostęp: 24.07.2020). The White House (2015). President Obama’s Trip to Alaska, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/2015-alaska-trip (dostęp: 05.07.2020). The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2016). Fact sheet: United States Hosts First-EverArctic Science Ministerial to Advance International Research Efforts, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/28/fact-sheetunited-states-hosts-first-ever-arctic-science-ministerial (dostęp: 05.07.2020). Turekian, V. C., T. Kishi. 2017. Science and Technology Advising in Today’s For eign Policy, Science Diplomacy 6 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/science_and_technology_advising_in_todays_foreign_policy_science__ diplomacy_0.pdf (dostęp: 02.06.2017). Turekian, V., Gluckman P., Kishi T, Grimes R. (2018). Science Diplomacy: A Prag matic Perspective from the Inside, Science Diplomacy 6 (4), https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/pragmatic_perspective_science_advice_ dec2017_l.pdf (dostęp: 16.01.2018). Turekian, V., Neureiter N. (2012). Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue, Science Diplomacy 1 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ science_and_diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 19.04.2019). UK Research and Innovation (2018). Strategic Prospectus: Building the UKRI Strategy. Insight, Inspiration, Impact. United Kingdom,
https://www.ukri.org/ about-us/strategic-prospectus/ (dostęp: 22.07.2020). UK Science and Innovation Network (2020). UK Science and Innovation Network, https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovation-network (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Ulnicane, I. (2014). Europe of Knowledge 2014: High Expectations and Complex Realities I Europe ofKnowledge, https://era.ideasoneurope.eu/2014/01/07/europeof-knowledge-2014-high-expectations-and-complex-realities/ (dostęp: 9.07.2020). UN Security Council (2018). Resolution 2417 (2018), S/RES/24171(2018), https:// undocs.org/S/RES/2417(2018) (dostęp: 20.08.2020). UNESCO (2019). Science, technology and innovation. Research and develop ment spending, http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SCN_ DS lang=en (dostęp: 16.04.2019). UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2018). How Much Your Country Invests in R D, http://uis.unesco.org/apps/visualisations/research-and-development-spending/ (dostęp: 16.04.2019). US Advisory Commission On Public Diplomacy 2018 (2018). Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting, https://www.state. gov/documents/organization/287683.pdf (dostęp: 16.04.2019). US Agency for International Development (2019). Science at USAID, https://www.usaid.gov/ what-we-do/science-technolog-and-innovation/science-usaid (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Bibliografia ■*֊ 305
US Department of State (2015). History and Mission of ECA, http://eca.state.gov/ about-bureau/history-and-mission-eca (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019a). U.S. Science Envoy Program, https://www.state. gov/e/oes/stc/scienceenvoy/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019b). Innovation Forum, https://2009-2017.state.gOv/s/d/ innovation (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019c). The Secretary’s Office of Global Partnerships, https://www.state.gOv/s/partnerships/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Tools for an EU Science Diplomacy, http://cris.unu. edu/sites/cris.unu.edu/files/Tools%20for%20an%20EU%20Science%20Diplomacy%20~%20Luk%20Van%20Langenhove.pdf (dostęp: 3.06.2017). Wengenroth, U. (2000). Science, Technology, and Industry in the 19th Century, http://www.mzwtg.mwn.tum.de/fileadmin/wOObmt/www/Arbeitspapiere/Wengenroth_sci-tech-ind-19c.pdf (dostęp 10.04.2019). Wilton Park (2019). Wilton Park. An Executive Agency of the Foreign and Common wealth Office. Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19, https://www.wiltonpark.org . uk/wp-content/uploads/Wilton-Park-annual-reports-and-accounts-2018-2019. pdf (dostęp: 22.07.2020). Witze, A. (2017). Trump agenda threatens US legacy of science diplomacy, Nature News and Comments, 27 January, https://www.nature.com/news/trump-agenda-threatens-us-legacy-of-science-diplomacy-1.21382 (dostęp: 18.04.2019). Wolfe, A. (2015). When Scientists Do What Diplomats Can’t, The Atlantic, Sep. 26, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/09/science-diplomacy/ (dostęp: 16.04.2019). World Atlas
(2019). Countries With The Most Nobel Laureates In Physiology And Medicine, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-most-nobel-laureates-in-physiology-and-medicine.html (dostęp: 17.04.2019). World Trade Organisation (WTO). 2019. Regional Trade Agreements Database. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rta_participation_map_e.htm Wren, K. (2014). Science Diplomacy Visit to Cuba Produces Historic Agreement, American Association for the Advancement of Science News. Published on 29th April at: https://www.aaas.org/news/science-diplomacy-visit-cuba-produces-historic-agreement(Accessed: 27 April 2019). Zgromadzenie Ogólne Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych (ftìW). Przekształca my nasz świat. Agenda na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030, A/RES/70/1, https://www.un.org.pl/agenda-2030-rezolucja (dostęp: 20.07.2020). 306 Bibliografia
|
| adam_txt |
Spis treści 7 Wstęp . Koncepcja 1. Dyplomacja naukowa . 27 1.1. Nauka i dyplomacja. 27 1.2. Pojęcie „dyplomacji naukowej” . 35 1.3. Dyplomacja naukowa w świetle nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych . 59 Praktyka 2. Dyplomacja naukowa państw. 67 2.1. Dyplomacja naukowa Stanów Zjednoczonych . 67 2.2. Dyplomacja naukowa Japonii. 81 2.3. Dyplomacja naukowa Wielkiej Brytanii. 96 2.4. Dyplomacja naukowa Francji. 115 2.5. Dyplomacja naukowa Polski. 131 2.6. Dyplomacja naukowa Węgier. 152 3. Dyplomacja naukowa organizacji międzynarodowych . 175 3.1. Dyplomacja naukowa Unii Europejskiej . 175 3.2. Dyplomacja naukowa Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych do spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa . 205 3.3. Dyplomacja
naukowa w ramach wielostronnej współpracy międzynarodowej w Arktyce. 224 Spis treści ֊ 5
4. Dyplomacja naukowa wspólnotepistemicznych. 249 4.1. Dyplomacja naukowa, wspólnoty epistemiczne i regionalizm w Europie nordycko-baltyckiej. 249 Bibliografia. 273 Summary. 307 6 -^ Spis treści
Bibliografía Akty prawne i dokumenty źródłowe Council of the European Union. (2015). Review of the European Research Area advisory structure. Council conclusions (adopted on 01/12/2015). Brussels. European Commission. (2000). Making a reality of The European Research Area: Guidelines for EU research activities (2002-2006): Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM/2000/0612 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2001). The International dimension of the European Rese arch Area: Communication from the Commission. COM/2001/0346 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2006). Europe in the World — Some Practical Proposals for Greater Coherence, Effectiveness and Visibility: Communication from the Commission to the European Council. COM(2006) 278 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2007). Green Paper The European Research Area: New Perspectives. {SEC(2007) 412}. Brussels. European Commission. (2008a). A Strategic European Framework for International Science and Technology Cooperation: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM(2008)588 final of 24.09.2008. Brussels. European Commission. (2008b). INCO-NETprojects: Supporting international science and technology cooperation with major regions of the world. Brussels. European Commission. (2008c). Opening to the world: International cooperation in Science and Technology: Report of the ERA Expert Group. Brussels. European Commission. (2012a).Л Reinforced European Research Area Partnership
for Excellence and Growth: Communication from the Commission to the Euro pean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012) 392 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2012b). Commission Staff Working Document: Accompa nying the document: Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach COM(2012) 497final (SWD(2012) 258 final). Bibliografia 273
European Commission. (2012c). Enhancing andfocusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach. СОМ(2012) 497 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2012d). International Cooperation in Science, Technology and Innovation: Strategies for a Changing World: Report of the Expert Group established to support the further development of an EU international STI cooperation strategy. Brussels. European Commission. (2012e). Projects in support of international research and innovation cooperation: International cooperation activities of the FP7 capacities programme. Brussels. European Commission. (2013). HORIZON 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015. (European Commission Decision C (2015)2453 of 17 April 2015) Brussels. European Commission. (2014a). Basic principles for effective international science, technology and innovation agreements: Executive Summary. Brussels. European Commission. (2014b). Basic principlesfor effective international science, technology and innovation agreements: Main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014c). European added value of EU science, technology and innovation actions and EU-Member State partnership in international cooperation: Main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014d). International science and technology cooperation in theEU’s 7th Framework Programme: The specific programme ‘Cooperation’ and its thematic areas .· main report. Brussels. European Commission. (2014e). Report on the implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation . European Commission. (2015a). A new
role for EU Research and Innovation in the benefit of citizens: Towards an open and transformative R Ipolicy: Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE) . European Commission. (2015b). ERA Open to the World EU R I strategy responding to globalisation: Policy Brief by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE). Brussels. European Commission. (2015c). Ex-post evaluation of international cooperation activities of the seventh framework programme’s: Capacities programme : final report. Brussels. European Commission. (2015d). HORIZON 2020 -Work Programme 2016 -2017: 13. Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies. (European Commission Decision C (2015)6776 of 13 October 2015. Brussels. European Commission. (2016a). Implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation. COM(2016) 657 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2016b). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: A vision for Europe. Brussels. European Commission. (2016c). Science and innovation for development: A study into the contribution and complementarity of EU international research and innovation cooperation with developing countries in FP7 (2007-2013): final report. Brussels. 274 -·“-՛ Bibliografia
European Commission. (2016d). Science, research and innovation performance of the EU: A contribution to the Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World agenda. Brussels. European Commission. (2016e). Strategic Plan 2016-2020. Ref. Ares(2016)1051529 - 01/03/2016. Brussels. European Commission. (2017a). Europe’s future Open innovation, open science, open to the world: Reflections of the Research, Innovation and Science Policy Experts (RISE) High Level Group. Brussels. European Commission. (2017b). Evaluation of the Participation of the EU in rese arch and development programmes undertaken by several Member States based on Article 185 of the TFEU: Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels. European Commission. (2017c). Meta-Evaluation ofArticle 185 Initiatives: Report of the Expert Group. Brussels, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/ publication/3966c4a7-b47c-lle7-837e-01aa75ed71al/language-en/format-PDF/ source-66145783. European Commission. (2017d). Public Consultation on the Evaluation ofArticle 185 Initiatives. Brussels. European Commission. (2017e). Strategic Forum for International Science and Technology Cooperation (SFIC) | International Cooperation - Research and Innovation - European Commission, Brussels. European Commission. (2019a). International Cooperation: The EU bi-lateral S T agreements with individual countries, Brussels. European Commission. (2019b). Open Europe.: Policies, reforms and achievements in EU science and innovation 2014-2019 under EU Commissioner Carlos Moedas. Open innovation, open science, open to the world. Brussels. FAO
(1996), Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit plan ofAction, World Food Summit, Rome 13-17 November 1996. FAO (2020c), TransformingAgricultural Research and Extension Systems. Unlocking the potential ofagricultural innovations to achieve Sustainable Development Goals, Rome. Government of Japan (GoJ). (2016). The 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. January 22 2016. Tokyo. House of Lords, Select Committee on Soft Power and the UK’s Influence (2014), Persuasion and Power in Modern World. Report of Session 2013-2014, HL Paper 150. HL Paper 150. House of Parliament. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, (2018). Science Diplomacy. Postnote nr 568 Feb. 2018. Interfax (2018). Cooling between U.S., Russia Doesn’t Affect Space Cooperation NASA official, Moscow, 21 December. Komisja Europejska. (2016). Wspólna wizja, wspólne działanie: Silniejsza Euro pa: Globalna strategia na rzecz polityki zagranicznej i bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej. Bruksela. Konstytucja Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych Do Spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa, (1945), podpisana w Quebec, 16 października 1945 roku, Dz.U. 1958.57.283. Bibliografia -^ 275
Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche and Ministère des affaires étrangères (2014), La coordination de l’action internationale en matière d’en seignement supérieur et de recherche. Ministère des Affaires étrangères (2015). MAEDI21 - Global diplomacy for the 21st century. Paris: Ministère des Affaires étrangères Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (2010). White Paper on Science and Technology 2010. A New Frontier to Be Extended by Value-creating Human Resources -How Science and Technology Should Be for Japan to Make a New Start. Tokyo: MEXT. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) - Directorate General of Global Affairs, Devel opment and Partnerships, (2013). Science Diplomacy for France. Paris: MFA. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA), (2016). Diplomatic Bluebook. Japanese Diplomacy and International Situation in 2015. Tokyo: MOFA. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA), (2018). Diplomatic Bluebook. Japanese Diplomacy and International Situation in 2017. Tokyo: MOFA. Ministry of Higher Education and Research of France, (2010). National Research and Innovation Strategy. Paris. Ministry of Higher education, Research and Innovation of France, (2017). Higher Education and Research in France - Facts and Figures. Paris. Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. o Narodowym Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, Dz.U.2017.1447 t.j. z dnia 2017.07.28. Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. o Narodowym Centrum Nauki, Dz.U. 2018, poz. 947, z późn. zm. Ustawa z dnia 7 lipea 2017 r. o Narodowej Agencji Wymiany Akademickiej, Dz. U. z 2017 r. poz. 1530,
z 2018 r. poz. 1669. Wywiady Wywiad z pracownikiem Ambasady RP we Francji (2019). Paryż. Wywiad z pracownikiem Biura Promocji Nauki PolSCA (2019). Bruksela. Wywiad z pracownikiem Narodowego Centrum Nauki (2019). Kraków. Wywiad z pracownikiem NAWA (2019). Warszawa. Wywiad z pracownikiem Polskiej Akademii Nauk (2019). Warszawa. Wywiad z urzędnikiem Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (2019). Warszawa. 276 ^ Bibliografia
Opracowania zwarte Akerlund, A. (2020). Regeringsstyrning av svensk offentlig diplomati: Om Svenska institutets myndighetsinstruktioner och regleringsbrev 1998-2018. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola. Alston, P. (2005). AW-sta/e actors and human rights. New York: Oxford University Press. Altbach P.G. (2007). Globalization and the University: Realities in an Unequal World. W: International Handbook ofHigher Education (s. 121-140). J.J.F. Forest, P.G. Altbach (red). Dordrecht: Springer. Archer, C., Scrivener, D. (2000). International Co-operation in the Arctic Envi ronment. W: The Arctic. Environment, people, policy (s. 601-619). Μ. Nuttall, T. Callaghan (red). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (2015). Editors’ Introduction: Science, Technology, and Innovation Go Global. W: The handbook ofglobal science, technology, and inno vation (ss. 1-11). D. Archibugi, A. Filippetti (red.). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Barr, S., Lüdecke, C. (red.). (2010). The History of the International Polar Years (IPYs). Heidelberg: Springer. Barr, W. (2008). The expeditions of the first international polar year 1882-1883. Calgary: The Arctic Institute of North America. Barston, R.P. (2014). Modern Diplomacy. 4th ed. Madison: Taylor and Francis. Bátora, J., Hynek, N. (2014). Fringe Players and Diplomatic Order, The New Het eronomy. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Bay Rasmussen, S. (2018). The ideas and practices of the European Union’s struc tural antidiplomacy: An unstable equilibrium. Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff. Behr, H., Stivachtis, Y. A. (red.). (2016).
Revisiting the European Union as an empire. Abington, New York: Routledge. Bennett, B. Μ. (2011). The Consolidation and Reconfiguration of “British” Networks of Science, 1800-1970. W: Science and Empire. Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800-1970 (s. 30-45). J.M. Hodge, B.M. Ben nett (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Berman, Μ.R. Johnson, J.E. (1977). Unofficial Diplomats. New York: Columbia University Press. Berridge, G., Keens-Soper, H.M.A., Otte, T.G. (2001). Diplomatic theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Houndsmill: Palgrave. Bertelsen, R.G. (2019). The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance: The Case ofKnowledge-Based Cooperation and Science Diplomacy. W: The GlobalArctic handbook (s. 251-267). Μ. Finger, L. Heininen (red). Cham: Springer. Bertelsen, R.G. (2020). Science diplomacy and the Arctic. W: Routledge Handbook ofArctic Security (s. 234-245). G. Hoogensen Gjørv, Μ. Lanteigne, H. SamAggrey. London: Routledge. Bertelsen, R.G., Li, X., Gregersen, М.Н. (2016). Chinese Arctic Science Diplomacy: An Instrument for Achieving the Chinese Dream?. W: Global Challenges in the Bibliografia -^ 277
Arctic Region: Sovereignty, environment and geopolitical balance (s. 442-460). E. Conde, S. I. Sanchez (red.). New York: Routledge. Biechi, F., Bremberg, N. (red.). (2018). European Diplomacy in Practice: Interro gating power, agency and change. London: Routledge. Bierzanek R., Symonides J. (1992). Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Bjola, C. (2015). Introduction: making sense ofdigital diplomacy. W: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (s. 1-11). C. Bjola and Μ. Holmes (eds.). London: Routledge. Bjola, C., Kornprobst, Μ. (2018). Understanding international diplomacy. Theory, practice and ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Blockmans, S., Koutrakos, P. (red.). fâ№). Research handbook on theEU’s common foreign and security policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Börzei, T. A., Risse, T., Wiener, A. (red.). (2019). European integration theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boyer, R. (2009). From the Lisbon Agenda to the Lisbon Treaty: national research systems in the context ofEuropean integration and globalization. W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 101-126). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Brown, L.R. (1972). World Without Borders: The Interdependence ofNations. New York: Foreign Policy Association. Bryla, J. (1998). Czynniki kształtujące stosunki międzynarodowe. W: Stosunki mię dzynarodowe (s. 25-36). W. Malendowski, Cz. Mojsiewicz (red.). Wroclaw: Atla2. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, Μ.,
Reus-Smit, Ch., True, J. (2009). Theories ofInternational Relations. 4th edition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. (1998). Security. A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Caloghirou, Y, Vonortas, N. S., Ioannides, S. (red.). ĢBM). European collaboration in research and development: Business strategy and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Campbell, C.A. (2015). US Science Diplomacy with Arab Countries. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 22-46). L.S. Davis, R. G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Caracostas, P., Muldur, U. (2003). The Emergence ofa New European Union Rese arch and Innovation Policy. W: Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. An international comparative analysis (s. 157-203). P. Larédo (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Carta, C. (2012). European Union Diplomatic service: Ideas, preferences and identities. Abingdon: Routledge. Carta, C., Higgott, R. A. (red.). (2020). Cultural diplomacy in Europe: Between the domestic and the international. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Chaban, N., Holland, Μ. (2019). Shaping the EU Global Strategy: Partners and Perceptions. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 278 "^ Bibliografia
Chou, М-H., Gornitzka, A. (red.). (2014). Building the knowledge economy in Euro pe: New constellations in European research and higher education governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Cohen R. (1998). Putting diplomatic studies on the map. Diplomatic Studies Pro gramme Newsletter. Leicester: Leicester University. Constantinou, C.M., Cornago N., McConnell, F. (2016). Transprofessional diplo macy. Leiden: Brill. Constantinou, C.M., Sharp, P. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives in Diplomacy. W; The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (s. 13-27). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cooper, A.F., Heine, J., Thakur, R (red). (2013). The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Copeland, D. (2016). Science Diplomacy. W: The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (s. 628-640). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cornago, N. (2016). Diplomatic Knowledge. W: The SAGE Handbook of Diploma cy (s. 133-146). C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp (red). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Cox, R.W., Jacobsen, H.K., (1973). The Anatomy of Influence. Decision Making in International Organization. New Haven: Yale University Press. Cross, M.’a. K. D., Melissen, J. (2013). European public diplomacy: Soft power at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Crowther, J. G. (1937). FamousAmericanMen ofScience. NewYork: W. Norton Co., Inc. Czapliński W., A. Wyrozumska A., (2004). Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa: C.H. Beck. Delanghe, H., Muldur, U., Soete, L. (red.). (2009).
European science and techno logypolicy: Towards integration orfragmentation?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DeVorkin, D. (1992). Science with a Vengeance ; How the Military Created the US Space Sciences after World War II. New York: Springer-Verlag. Dratwa, J. (2009). Analysing Community policies. W: European science and tech nologypolicy: Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 78-97). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W. (2006). Global scientization: An environmentfor expanded organization. W: Globalization and organization: World society and organiza tional change (s. 50-68). G.S. Drori, J.W. Meyer, H. Wang (red.). New York: Oxford University Press. Edgerton, D. (1997). Science in the United Kingdom: A Study in the Nationalization of Science. W: Science in the Twentieth Century (s. 815-838). J. Krige, D. Pestre (red.). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S., Behrens, Μ. (red.). (2004). Changing governance of research and technology policy: The European research area. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Emmers, R. (2015). Securitization. W: Contemporary Security Studies (s. 168-181). A. Collins (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bibliografia ·«֊ 279
Ewert, S. (2012). Region Building im Ostseeraum: Zur Rolle der Hochschulen im Prozess der Regionalisierung im Nordosten der Europäischen Union. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Eysymontt, Μ. (2019). Pozycja instytucjonalna urzędu Wysokiego Przedstawiciela Unii do Spraw Zagranicznych i Polityki Bezpieczeństwa: Od koncepcji, przez narodziny, po nieustanną ewolucję. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck. Flink, T., Rüffln N., (2019). The Current State of Art of Science Diplomacy. W: Handbook on Science and Public Diplomacy (s. 104-121). D. Simon. E. Kuh lmann, J. Stamm, W. Canzler (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Garnett, Μ., Mabon, S. and Smith, R. (2018). British Foreign Policy since 1945. New York: Routledge. Gaskarth, J., Porter, R. and Edmunds, T. (2014). Introduction. W: British Foreign Policy and the National Interest. Identity, Strategy and Security (s. 1-23). T. Edmunds, J. Gaskarth, R. Porter, (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Gilmore, J. (2014). The Uncertain Merger of Values and Interests in UK Foreign Policy. W: British Foreign Policy and the National Interest. Identity, Strategy and Security (s. 23-42). T. Edmunds, J. Gaskarth, R. Porter, (red.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Glover, N. (2011). National relations: public diplomacy, national identity and the Swedish Institute 1945-1970. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. Gornitzka, A. (2009). Research Policy and the European Union - Multi-Layered Policy Change? W: The Research Mission of the University (s. 53-75). P. Clancy, D.D. Dill (red.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Gstöhl, S., Schunz, S.
(red.). (2018). Theorizing the European neighbourhoodpolicy. Abingdon: Routledge. Gurgul, H. (2002). Biale pustynie - Arktyka. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Kurpisz. Guzzetti, L. (2009). The European Research Area’ idea in the history of Com munity policy-making. W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 64-77). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Hallonsten, O. (2014). The Politics ofEuropean Collaboration in Big Science. W: The Global Politics ofScience and Technology - Vol. 2: Perspectives, Cases and Methods (s. 31-46). Μ. Mayer, Μ. Carpes, R. Knoblich (red.). Heidelberg: Springer. Hanne, K. (2017). Introduction: Emergence of a European Model Region. W: The Baltic Sea Region: A Comprehensive Guide. History, Politics, Culture andEconomy of a European Role Model (s. 10-44). B. Henningsen, T. Etzold, К. Hanne (red.). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Hassler, B. (2003). Science and Politics of Foreign Aid: Swedish Environmental Support to the Baltic States. Springer Netherlands. Headrick, D. Μ. (1981). The Tools ofEmpire. Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press. Headrick, D. Μ. (2012). Power over Peoples. Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 280 ·*·' Bibliografia
Heininen, L., Everett, К., Padrtova, В., Reissell, А. (2020). Artcic Policies and Strategies-Analysis, Synthesis, and Trends. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (HASA). Hennemann, S., Liefner, I. (2015). Global Science Collaboration. W: The hand book of global science, technology, and innovation (s. 343-363). D. Archibugi, A. Filippetti (red.). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Hill, C., Smith, Μ. (red.). (2017). International relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hocking, B. (1999). Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond ‘Newness’ and ‘Decline’. W: Inno vation in Diplomatic Practice (s. 21-42). J. Melissen (red). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Hodge, J. Μ. (2011). Science and Empire: An Overview of the Historical Scholar ship. W: Science and Empire. Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire 1800-1970 (s. 3-30). J.Μ. Hodge, B.M. Bennett (red.). Basing stoke: Palgrave. Holmes, Μ. (2015). Digital diplomacy: between promises and reality. W: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (s.13-32). C. Bjola, Μ. Holmes (red.). London: Routledge. Huebert, R. (2013). Cooperation or Conflict in the New Arctic? Too Simple of a Dichot omy!. N7: Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean (s. 195-203). P.A. Berkman, A.N. Vylegzhanin (red.). Dordrecht: Springer. Inserra, I. (2017). La diplomatie par la science de la France - Le rôle et la place des attachés scientifiques en ambassades 1955-2015, nieopublikowana praca magisterska, Sorbonne Université. Jakniūnaitė, D., Vaicekauskaitė, Z. Μ. (2017). Baltic Sea Region-Building: An
Impos sibility, oran Inability to Finish? W: Borders in the Baltic Sea Region: Suturing the Ruptures (s. 103-124). A. Makarychev, A. Yatsyk (red.). London: Palgrave. Joenniemi, P., Jervell, S., Kukk, Μ. (red.). (1992). The Baltic Sea area: A region in the making. Oslo: Europa-Programmet in cooperation with the Baltic Institute. Joenniemi, P., Stålvant, C.-E. (red.). (1995). Baltic Sea Politics: Achievements and Challenges. Copenhagen: The Nordic Council. Joenniemi, P., Wæver, О. (f9921). Regionalization around the Baltic Rim, background report to the 2nd parliamentary conference on co-operation in the Baltic Sea Area. Oslo: the Nordic Council. Jönsson, Ch. (2012). Theorising diplomacy. W: Routledge handbook of diplomacy and statecraft (s. 15-28). B.J.C. McKercher (red.). London: Routledge. Jönsson, Ch. (2016). States Only? The Evolution of Diplomacy. W: The Transfor mation of Foreign Policy. Drawing and Managing Boundaries From Antiquity to the Present (s. 242-262). G. Hellmann, A. Fahrmeir, Μ. Vee (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jönsson, Ch. (2018). International Relations Theory and Diplomacy. W: The encyclopedia of diplomacy, vol. 19 ( s.1-16). G. Martel (red.). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Bibliografia 281
Jönsson, Ch., Hall, M. (2005). Essence of diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Jørgensen, K. E., Aarstad, A. K., Drieskens, E., Laatikainen, К., Tonra, В. (red.). (2015). The SAGE handbook ofEuropean foreign policy: Two volume set. Lon don: SAGE. Kant, I. (1957). Krytyka czystego rozumu. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Kelley, J.R. (2014). Agency Change. Diplomatic Action Beyond the State. Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Kelly, C. (2004). Remembering the Manhattan Project perspectives on the making of the atomic bomb and its legacy. New York: World Scientific. Keskitalo, E.C.H. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic. The construction ofan international region. New York: Routledge. Kharitonova, E., Prokhorenko, I. (2020). Russian Science Diplomacy. W: Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution andPractice (s. 133-146). A. A. Velikaya, G. Simons (red.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Klebelsberg, K. (1927). Neonacionalizmus. Budapest: Atheneum. Kochanowski, J. (1997).Węgry od ugody do ugody. Warszawa: Trio. Koops, J. A., Macaj, G. (red.). (2015). The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Korppoo, A., Tynkkynen, N., Hönneland, G. (2015). Russia and the Politics of International Environmental Regimes: Environmental Encounters or Foreign Policy? Edward Elgar Pubishing. Krasnyak, O. (2018). National Styles in Science, Diplomacy, and Science Diplo macy. Leiden: Brill. Krige, J. (red.). (1996). History of CERN. Burligton: Elsvier. Krige, J., Guzzetti, L. (red.). (1997). History ofEuropean scientific and technologi cal cooperation.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Kubiak, K. (2012). Epizody „wojny o pogodę”. Niemieckie załogowe stacje mete orologiczne w Arktyce: 1941-1945. Zabrze, Tarnowskie Góry: Wydawnictwo Inforteditions. Laakkonen, S., Räsänen, T. (2016). Science Diplomacy in the Baltic Sea Region : Beginnings of East-West Cooperation in Marine Protection during the Cold War. Helsinki: Aleksanteri Instituutti. Lane, Ph. (2013). French Scientific and Cultural Diplomacy. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Ławecka, D. (2000). Wstęp do archeologii. Warszawa: Instytut Archeologii UW. Leach, J. (2015). The Role of Science Communication in International Diplomacy. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 155-169). L.S. Davis, R.G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Lindroos, P., Musial, K. (2914). Dimensions of educational and research co-operation in the Baltic Sea Region. W: Political State of the Region Report (s. 47-52). B. Hen ningsen, Etzold T, Opitz Ch. (red.). Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum. 282 "«^ Bibliografia
Łoś-Nowak T. (2006). Stosunki międzynarodowe. Teorie - systemy - uczestnicy, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Łoś-Nowak T. (2013). Polityka zagraniczna - stałe i zmienne komponenty procesu formułowania ireatizacji. W: Polityka zagraniczna. Aktorzy, potencjały, strategie (s. 42-61). T. Łoś-Nowak T (red.). Warszawa: Poltext. Łoś-Nowak T. (red.). (2009). Organizacje w stosunkach międzynarodowych. Istota - mechanizmy działania - zasięg. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Łuszczuk, Μ. (2015). Ewolucja ról międzynarodowych w Arktyce. Lublin: Wydaw nictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Łuszczuk, Μ. (red.). (2013). Arktyka na początku XXI wieku. Między współpracą a rywalizacją. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Łuszczuk, Μ., Graczyk, P., Stępień, A., Śmieszek, Μ. (2015): Cele i narzędzia polskiej polityki arktycznej. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicz nych RP. Marzęda-Mlynarska, K. (2014). Globalne zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem żywno ściowym na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Mathiason J. (2011). International Secretariats: Diplomats of Civil Servants? W: The New Dynamics ofMultilateralism: Diplomacy, International Organizations and Global Governance (s. 237-248). J.P. Muldoon, J.F. Aviel, R. Reitano, E. Sullivan (red.). Boulder: Westview Press. McCannon, J. (2012). A history of the Arctic. Nature, exploration and exploitation. London: Reaktion Books. McNeese, T. (2013). U.S. Constitution. Miejsce wydania nieznane: Lorenz Edu cational Press. Melissen J. (red.).
(2005). The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Melissen, J. (2005). Wielding Soft Power: The New Public Diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”. Milkoreit, Μ. (2015). Science and Climate Change Diplomacy: Cognitive Limits and the Need to Reinvent Science Communication. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn (s. 110-139). L.S. Davis, R. G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Minas, S., Ntousas, V. (red.). (2019). EU Climate Diplomacy: Politics, law and negotiations. London: Routledge. Missiroli, A. (red.). (2016). The EU and the world: Players and policies post-Lisbon: a handbook. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Mitrany D., (1975). The Functional Theory of Politics. London: New York: St. Martin’s Press. Monkiewicz, G., Monkiewicz, J. Ruszkiewicz, J. (1989). Zagraniczna polityka naukowo-techniczna w Polsce. Diagnoza, uwarunkowania, kierunki. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Bibliografia ֊^ 283
Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, В., Vanslembrouck S. (2007). A new dealfor an effective European research policy: The design and impacts of the 7th Framework Programme. Dordrecht: Springer. Mūšiai, K. (2002). Education, Research and the Baltic Sea Region-building. W: Approaching Knowledge Society in the Baltic Sea Region (s. 41-58). K. Musia! (red.). Gdańsk and Berlin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Nordeu ropa-Institut der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Musia!, К. (2006). Regional universities in the Baltic Sea region: higher education and regional development. W: Higher Education and National Development: Universities and Societies in Transition (s. 120-132). D. Bridges (red.). Lon don: Routledge. Musial, K., Schumacher, T. (2018). Scientific Excellence: Joint Potentials in the Baltic Sea Region - an explorative study. Hamburg: Baltic Science Network. Nagy, Z. (2017). Great Expectations and Interwar Realities: Hungarian Cultural Diplomacy. Budapest: CEU Press. National Research Council (2002). Knowledge and Diplomacy. Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington DC: The National Academy Press. Neumann, I.B., Leira, H. (JBYÌ). International Diplomacy. Vol. 3: The Plurálisadon of Diplomacy-Changing Actors, Developing Arenas and New Issues. London: Sage. Nikodemus, О., Kļaviņš, Μ., Krišjāne, Z., Zelčs, V. S., (2018). Latvija: zeme, daba, tauta, valsts. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskais apgāds. Nilsson, A.E. (2007). A changing Arctic climate. Science and policy in the Arctic climate impact assessment.
Linköping: Linköping University. Nilsson, A.E. (2016). A Changing Arctic Climate: More than Just Weather. W: Legacies and change in polar sciences. Historical, legal and political reflections on the Inter national Polar Year (s. 9-33). Μ. Tennberg, J.M. Shadian (red.). London: Routledge. Noortmann Μ., Reinisch A., Ryngaert C. (red.). (2015). Non-state actors in Inter national law. London: Hart Publishing. North, Μ. (2016). The Baltic: A History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Nye, J.S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. Nye, J.S. (2004). Power in the Global Information Age. From Realism to Globali zation. New York: Routledge. Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. Nye, J.S., Keohane, R.O. (ZUM). Power and interdependence. New York: Longman. Ociepka В. (2013). Miękka sila i dyplomacja publiczna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnic two Naukowe Scholar. OECD/FAO (2016). International Regulatory Co-operation and International Organisations: The Case of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Paris, Rome: OECD/FAO Pamment, J. (2016). British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. Diplomatic Influence and the Digital Revolution. Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. 284 Bibliografia
Pasierbiak, P. (2008). Miejsce Unii Europejskiej w zagranicznej ekspansji gospo darczej Japonii. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag. Penca, J. (2018). The Rhetoric of ‘Science Diplomacy’: Innovation for the EU’s Scientific Cooperation. The EL-CSID Working Paper. Issue 2018/16. Peterson, J., Sharp, Μ. (1998). Technology policy in the European Union. Basing stoke: Macmillan. Pietraś, Μ. (2007). Procesy globalizacji. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 572-574). Μ. Pietraś (red.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pietraś, Μ., (2007). Organizacje międzynarodowe. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 92-105). Μ. Pietraś (red.). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pietraś, ZJ. (1986). Podstawy teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Lublin: Wydaw nictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Pisarska, K. (2016). The Domestic Dimension of Public Diplomacy - Evaluating Success through Civil Engagement. London: Palgrave McMillan. Popiuk-Rysińska L, (1994). Uczestnicy stosunków międzynarodowych, ich interesy i oddziaływanie. W: Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza, struktura, funkcjo nowania (s 83-101). E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar (red.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2010b). The European Research Area ‘goes global’: an introduc tion. W: International science and technology cooperation in a globalized world՛. The external dimension of the European research area (s. 1-30). H. PrangeGstöhl (red.).
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2018). The External Engagement of the European Union in Science and Research: Towards EU Science Diplomacy? W: The Euro pean Union’s evolving external engagement՛. Towards new sectoral diplo macies? (s. 153-173). C. Damro, S. Gsteohl, S. Schunz (red.). London: Routledge. Prange-Gstöhl, H. (red). (2010a). International science and technology cooperation in a globalized world: The external dimension of the European research area. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Rana, K. S. (2011). 21st Century Diplomacy. A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. Regeringskansliet (red.). (2018). En strategisk agenda för internationalisering: delbetänkande. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik. Reid-Henry, S. (2019). Empire of Democracy: The Remaking of the West since the Cold War, 1971-2017. New York: Simon Schuster. Reinalda В., (1998). Organization theory and the autonomy of the International Labour Organization. Two classic studies still going strong. W: Autonomous Policy Making in International Organizations (s. 42-61). B. Reinalda, В. Verbeek (red.). London - New York: Routledge. Bibliografia -^ 285
Reinalda, V., Verbeek, В. (2004). The Issue ofDecision Making within International Organizations.\N\ Decision-Making within International Organizations (s. 9-41). B. Reinalda, В. Verbeek (red.). London: Routledge. Rogne, О., Corell, R.W., Kotlyakov, V.M. (2015). Initiation of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). W: IASC after 25 years. 25 years of international arctic research cooperation (s. 9-20). O. Rogne, V. Rachold, L. Hacquebord, R. Corell (red.). Potsdam: International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). Rosenau, J.N. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Con tinuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rostoks, T. (2010). Securitization and insecure societies. W: Rethinking security (s. 62-88). Ž. Ozoliņa (red.). Rīga: Zinātne. RS i AAAS (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. Navigating the changing balance ofpower. RS Policy Document 01/10. London: Royal Society and Ame rican Association for the Advancement in Science. Ruffini, P.-B. (2017). Science and diplomacy: A new dimension of international relations. Cham: Springer. Rumford, C. (2013). The SAGE handbook of European studies. Boston: SAGE. Satow, E. (2011). A Guide to Diplomatic Practice, vol II. Diplomatic Agents. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press. Schölte, J.A. (2008). From Government to Governance: Transition to a New Diploma cy. W: Global Governance and Diplomacy. Worlds Apart? (s. 39-62). A.F. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley (red.). Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cam
bridge University Press. Sharp, P. (2016). Domestic Public Diplomacy, Domestic Diplomacy, and Domestic Foreign Policy. W: The Transformation of Foreign Policy. Drawing and Mana ging Boundaries From Antiquity to the Present (s. 263-284). G. Hellmann, A. Fahrmeir, M. Vec (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shaw J., (2007). World Food Security. History since 1945. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmilan. Skolnikoff, E.B. (1993). The Elusive Transformation. Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Smigerska-Belczak, I. (2012). Instytucjonalizacja stosunków międzynarodowych w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego. Toruń: Mado. Smith, Μ., Keukeleire, S., Vanhoonacker, S. (Eds.). (2017). The diplomatic system of the European Union: Evolution, change and challenges. London: Routledge. Spence, D., Batora, J. (red.). (2015). The European External Action Service: Euro pean Diplomacy Post-Westphalia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Strange, Ց. (2015). States and Markets. XXX: Bloomsbury Revelations. Bloomsbury Academics. Sundararaman, S. (2008). Research Institutes as Diplomatic Actors. W: Global Gov ernance and Diplomacy. Worlds Apart? (s. 118-131). A.F. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley (red.). Miejsce wydania nieznane: Palgrave Macmillan. 286 Bibliografia
Surmacz, В. (¿015). Ewolucja współczesnej dyplomacji: Aktorzy, struktury, funkcje. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Surmacz, B. (red.). (2013a). Nowe oblicza dyplomacji. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uni wersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Surmacz, B. (2013b). Tendencja ewolucji współczesnej dyplomacji. W: Poziomy analizy stosunków międzynarodowych (s. 233-253). E. Haliżak, Μ. Pietraś (red.). Warszawa: PTSM, Wydawnictwo Rambler. Svunfeldt, C. (2009). A European Research Area built by the Member States? W: European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmentation? (s. 44-63). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Szkarłat, Μ. (2011). Żywność genetycznie zmodyfikowana w stosunkach między narodowych. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej. Taliaferro J. W, Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M. (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. W: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Pol icy (s. 1-42). S.E. Lobell, N.M., Ripsman, J.W., Taliaferro (red.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tassinari, F. (2004). Mare Europaeum: Baltic Sea Region Security and Coopera tion from Post-Wall to Post-Enlargement Europe. Copenhagen: Department of Political Science. Tennberg, Μ. (2000). Arctic environmental cooperation. A study in governmentality. Aidershot: Ashgate. Tenzer, N. (2020). International Expertise and the Diplomacy ofInfluence. W: Global Diplomacy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (s. 297-305). T. Balzacq, F. Charillon, F. Ramel (red.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tindemans, P. (2009). Post-war research, education and innovation policy-making in Europe. W. European science and technology policy. Towards integration orfragmen tation? (s. 3-23). H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, L. Soete (red.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Turekian, V. C., Macindoe, S., Copeland, D., Davis, L.S., Patman, R.G., Pozza, Μ. (2015). The Emergence of Science Diplomacy. W: Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn? (s. 3-24). Լ.Ց. Davis, R.G. Patman (red.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Umińska-WoronieckaA. (2013). Instytuty polskie. Zmiany modelowe w funkcjonowa niu polskiej dyplomacji kulturalnej w latach 1998-2011. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Umińska-Woroniecka W. (2018). Polityka zagraniczna - podejścia teoretyczne. W: Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne (s. 157-174). Ł. Fijałkowski, R. Kunert-Milcarz (red.). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Urbańczyk, P. (2004). Zdobywcy północnego Atlantyku. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. VanDeveer, S. D. (2004). Ordering Environments: Regions in European Interna tional Environmental Cooperation. W: Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (s. 309-334). S. Jasanoff, Μ. Long Martello (red). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Bibliografia -^ 287
Veiner, H. A. (1989). Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.^: Com prehensive Security for the Baltic: an Environmental Approach (s. 75-80). A.H. Westing (red.). London: Sage Publications. Vesa, U. J. (1989). Political security in the Baltic region. W: Comprehensive Security for the Baltic: an Environmental Approach (s. 35-45). A.H. Westing (red.). London: SAGE Publications. Wæver, О. (1997). The Baltic Sea: A Region after Post-Modernity?'N: Neo-Nation alism or Regionality? (s. 293-342). P. Joenniemi (red.). Stockholm: Nordiska institutet för regionalpolitisk forskning Williams, L.-K. (2007). Zur Konstruktion einer Region: die Entstehung der Ostseeko operation zwischen 1988 und 1992. Berlin: BWV, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Wiseman, G. (1999). “Polylateralism” and New Modes of Global Dialogue. Discus sion Paper 59. Leicester: Leicester Diplomatic Studies Programme. Wojciuk, A. (2016). Imperia wiedzy. Edukacja i nauka jako czynniki sily państw na arenie międzynarodowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. World Economic Forum (WEF), (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: WEF Young, O. R. (1992, draft): The Political Dynamics of International Regions: The Arctic as a Multiple Use-Region. Young, О.R., Cherkasov, A.L (1992). International Co-operation in the Arctic: Opportunities and Constraints. W: Arctic Alternatives. Civility or Militarism in the Circumpolar North (s. 10-25). F. Griffiths. Toronto: Science for Peace. Zaheer, B. (1996). The Science ofEmpire : Scientific Knowledge, Civilization, and Colonial Rule in India. New York: State
University of New York Press. Zenderowski, R. (2AW). Religia i stosunki międzynarodowe. W: Stosunki międzyna rodowe. Wokół zagadnień teoretycznych (s. 131-166). K. Kącka (red.). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Artykuły Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, International Organization, 58, 239-275. Ackers, L. (2005). Promoting Scientific Mobility And Balanced Growth In The European Research Area, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 18, 301-317. Adler-Nissen, R., Kropp, K. (2015). A Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Euro pean Integration: Four Analytical Principles, Journal ofEuropean Integration, 37, 155-173. Aggestam, K., Towns, A. (2019). The gender turn in diplomacy: a new research agenda, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(1), 9-28. 288 -^ Bibliografia
Alberton, M. (2012). Environmental Protection in the EU Member States: Changing Institutional Scenarios and Trends, L’Europe En Formation, 363, 287-300. Alexander, L. Μ. (1977). Regional Arrangements in the Oceans, The American Journal of International Law, 71, 84-109. Alic, J.A. (2008). A weakness in diffusion: US technology and science policy after World War II, Technology in Society, 30(1), 17-29. Altbach, P.G. (1998). Comparative Perspectives on Higher Education for the Twen ty-first Century, Higher Education Policy, 11(4), 347-356. Arsenault, A. and Cowan, G. (2008). Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Colla boration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(3), 10-30. Banchoff, T. (2002). Institutions, Inertia and European Union Research Policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 1-21. Barnett, M.N., Finnemore Μ., (1999). The Politics, Power and Pathologies of Inter national Organizations, International Organization, 53(4), 699-732. Bellamy, C. and Weinberg, A. (2008). Educational and cultural exchanges to restore America’s image, The Washington Quarterly, 31(3), 55-68. Ben-David, J. (1980). U.S. Science in International Perspective, Scientometrics, 2(5-6), 411-421. Berkman, P.A., Kullerud, L., Pope, A., Vylegzhanin, A.N., Young, O.R. (2017). The Arctic Science Agreement propels science diplomacy, Science, 358(6363), 596-598. Berkman, P.A., Young, O.R. (2009). Governance and Environmental Change in the Arctic Ocean, Science, 324(5925), 339-340. Biechi, F. (2013). Information exchanges,
diplomatic networks and the construction of European knowledge in European Union foreign policy, Cooperation and Conflict, 49, 239-259. Biechi, F., Bremberg, N. (2016). European diplomatie practices: contemporary challenges and innovative approaches, European Security, 25, 391-406. Boczek, В. A. (1978). International Protection of the Baltic Sea Environment Against Pollution: A Study in Marine Regionalism, The American Journal of Interna tional Law, TL, 782-814. Breschi, S., Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European Research Area: emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes, International Journal of Technology Management, 2Л, 747-772. Byers, Μ. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: an Arctic case study, Inter national Relations, 31(4), 375-402. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization, Government and Opposition, 32, 251-274. Chalecki, E.L. (2008). Knowledge in Sheep’s Clothing. How Science Informs American Diplomacy, Diplomacy Statecraft, 19 (1), 1-19. Cini, Μ. (2006). The ‘State of the Art’ in EU Studies: From Politics to Interdisci plinarity (and Back Again?), Politics, 26, 38-46. Bibliografia -^ 289
Colglazier, E.W. (2017). Optimism, Pessimism, and Science Diplomacy. Science Diplomacy 6(2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/optimism_pessimism_sciencediplomacy_june_2017.pdf (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Constantelou, A., Tsakanikas, A., Caloghirou, Y. (2004). Inter-country technological linkages in European Framework Programmes: a spur to European integration?, International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 773-790. Cross, M.’a. K. D. (2016). The EU Global Strategy and diplomacy, Contemporary Security Policy, 37, 402-413. Debarbieux, B., Balsiger, J., Djordjevic, D., Gaberell, S., Rudaz, G. (2014). Scientific collectives in region-building processes, Environmental Science Policy, 42, 149-159. Doel, R,E., Friedman, R.Μ., Lajus, J., Soriin, S., Wråkberg, U. (2014). Strategic Arctic science. National interests in building natural knowledge - interwar era through the Cold War, Journal of Historical Geography, 44, 60-80. Elera, A. de. (2006). The European Research Area: On the Way Towards a European Scientific Community?, European Law Journal, 12, 559-574. Fedoroff, N. V. (2009). Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Cell, 136, 9-11. Fleming, A.H., Pyenson, N. D. (2017). How to Produce Translational Research to Guide Arctic Policy, BioScience, 67 (6), 490-493. Flink, T., Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches, Science and Public Policy, 37 (9), 665-677. Fogarty International Center (2015). US-China renew commitment to global health security, Global Health
Matters, 14 (4), 1. Galsworthy, Μ., McKee, Μ. (2013). Europe’s ‘Horizon 2020’ science funding pro gramme: how is it shaping up?, Journal of health services research policy, 18 (3), 182-185. Gänzle, S. (2017). Macro-regional strategies of the European Union (EU) and experimentalist design of multi-level governance: the case of the EU strategy for the Danube region, Regional Federal Studies, 27, 1-22. Giannopoulos, G. A. (2017). Strategic management and promotion issues in inter national research cooperation, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5, 9-21. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 55-77. Goodsite, M.E., Bertelsen, R.G., Cassotta Pertoldi-Bianchi, S., Ren, J., van der Watt, L-M, Johannsson, H. (2016). The role of science diplomacy. A historical development and international legal framework of arctic research stations under conditions of climate change, post-cold war geopolitics and globalization/power transition, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6 (4), 645-661. Gusmão, R. (2001). Research networks as a means of European integration. Tech nology in Society, 23, 383-393. Harrington, C. (2016). The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene. Millennium, 44 (3), 478-498. 290 ·*" Bibliografia
Hettne, В., Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the Rise of Regionness, New Political Economy, 5, 457-472. Hjorth, R. (1994). Baltic Sea Environmental Cooperation: The Role of Epistemic Communities and the Politics of Regime Change, Cooperation and Conflict, 29, 11-31. Hocking, B. (1997/8). The end(s) of diplomacy, International Journal, 53 (1), 169-172. Hoekman, J., Scherngell, T, Frenken, К., Tijssen, R. (2013). Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration, Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 23-52. Höne, K. E., Kurbalija, J. (2018). Accelerating Basic Science in an Intergovernmental Framework: Learning from CERN’s Science Diplomacy, Global Policy, 9, 67-72. Kaijser, A., Larsson Heidenblad, D. (2018). Young Activists in Muddy Boots, Scan dinavian Journal of History, 43, 301-323. Kaltofen, C., Acuto, Μ. (2018). Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem. Global Policy 9 (3), 8-14. Kennedy, J.V. (2012). The Sources and Uses of U.S. Science Funding, The New Atlantis, 36, 3-22. Keohane R.O., Nye J.S., (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction, International Organization, 25 (3), 329-349. Kim, J., Yoo, J. (2019). Science and Technology Policy Research in the EU: From Framework Programme to HORIZON 2020, Social Sciences, 8, 153. Koivurova, T. (2010). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance, Polar Record, 46 (2), 146-156. Leese, Μ. (2018). Between a Carrot and a Stick: Science Diplomacy and Access to EU Research Funding, Global Policy, 9,
48-52. Leese, Μ. (2018). Between a Carrot and a Stick: Science Diplomacy and Access to EU Research Funding, Global Policy, 9 (3), 48-52. Legrand, T., Stone, D. (2008) Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact, British Politics, 13, s. 392-408. Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the Future of Innovation Diplomacy, European Journal of Futures Research, 5 (20), 1-13. Liu, H. (2018). Influence of the Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation on the approach of non-Arctic states to Arctic scientific activities, Advances in Polar Science, 29 (1), 51-60. López de San Roman, A., Schunz, S. (2017). Understanding European Union Science Diplomacy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56 (2), 247-266. Loukacheva, N. (2020). Law in the Canadian North, Norther Review, 50, 109-135. Luszczuk, Μ. (2017). Dyplomacja naukowa jako forma współpracy i rywalizacji w Arktyce, Teka Politologii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych PAN, 12 (2), 193-216. Łuszczuk, Μ., Padrtova, В., Szczerbowicz, W. (2020). Political dimension of Arctic research, Oceanologia, [w druku]. Machowski, J. (1993). IASC as legal framework of international scientific cooperation in Arctic, Polish Polar Journal, 14 (2), 177-207. Bibliografia ·«»- 291
Makarychev, A., Sergunin, A. (2017). Russia’s role in regional cooperation and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), Journal ofBaltic Studies, 48,465-479. Makkonen, T., Mitze, T. (2016). Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?, Scientometrics, 106, 1193-1215. Mazur, G. (2018). Umowa o partnerstwie gospodarczym Unia Europejska-Japonia - nowy rozdział w dwustronnych stosunkach handlowych. Unia Europejska, pl, 2 (249), 3-18. Mazur, G. (2016). Interesy ofensywne unijnych przedsiębiorstw w kontekście nego cjowanej umowy o strefie wolnego handlu UE-Japonia. Unia Europejska.pl, 3 (238), 6-18. Melchiorre, T. (2015). The protection of the sea as a cooperation area case in the Baltic Sea region, Regions and Cohesion, 5, 109-136. Misa, T. J., Schot, J. (2005). Inventing Europe: Technology and the hidden inte gration of Europe, History and Technology, 21, 1-19. Moisio, S., Leppänen, L. (2007). Towards a Nordic competition state? Politicoeconomic transformation of statehood in Finland, 1965-2005, Fennia - Inter nationaljournal of Geography, 185, 63-87. Moomaw, W.R. (2018). Scientist Diplomats or Diplomat Scientists: Who Makes Science Diplomacy Effective?, Global Policy, 9 (3), 78-80. Murray, S. (2012). The Renaissance of Diplomatic Theory. International Politics Quarterly, 33 (4), 23-39. Murray, S. (2008). Consolidating the Gains Made in Diplomacy Studies: A taxo nomy, International Studies Perspectives, 9 (1), 22-39. Musia!, K. (2003). Østersøregionen og videnssamfundets udfordringer,. Vindue
mod øst, 2, 31-36. Mūšiai, K., Šime, Z. (2020). How to build legitimacy of regional integration on rational foundations - a case of epistemic communities in the Baltic Sea area. Journal of Baltic Studies, w druku. Nagy, N. (2007). A Konstantinápolyi Magyar Tudományos Intézet története (19161918), Mediterrán és Balkán fórum. 1 (2), s. 2-7. Nagy-Darvas, J. (1997). Private Higher Education in Hungary, International Higher Education, 9, s.6-8. Nedeva, Μ. (2013). Between the global and the national: Organising European science, Research Policy, 42, 220-230. Nedeva, Μ., Stampfer, M. (2012). Science policy. From “science in Europe” to “European science”, Science, 336, 982-983. Neureiter, P. N. (1965). U.S.-Japan Cooperative Science Program, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists -ajournai of Science and Public Affairs, 21(1), 39. Nicholas, R. W. (2015). Why Diplomacy and Science Need Each Other, Foreign Affairs, June. Nitoiu, C., Sus, Μ. (2019). Introduction: strategy in EU foreign policy, International Politics, 56, 259-271. 292 ·*»· Bibliografia
Nőssel, S. (2004). Smart Power, Foreign Affairs, 83 (2), 131-142. Nye, J. S. Jr. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94-109. Palfreyman, D. (2007). Is academic freedom under threat in UK and US higher education?, Education and the Law, 19 (1), 19-40. Papon, P. (2004). European Scientific Cooperation and Research Infrastructures: Past Tendencies and Future Prospects, Minerva, 42, 61-76. Patman, R.G., Davis, L.S. (2017). Science Diplomacy in the Indo Pacific Region: A Mixed but Promising Experience, Politics Policy, 45 (5), 862-878. Piekut, Μ. (2012). Nakłady na działalność badawczo-rozwojową w krajach europej skich, Stanach Zjednoczonych oraz Japonii, Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w War szawie Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, 98, 135-151. Pisarska K. (2015). The role of domestic public engagement in the formulation and implementation of US government-sponsored educational exchanges: An insider’s account, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 11(1), 5-17. Pusztai, G. (2008). The Bologna Process in Hungary, European Education, 40 (2), 85-102. Rana, Kishan S. (2011). 21st Century Diplomacy. A Practitioner’s Guide. The Continuum International Publishing Group. Räsänen, T., Laakkonen, S. (2007). Cold War and the Environment: The Role of Finland in International Environmental Politics in the Baltic Sea Region, Ambio, 26, 229-236. Rathbun, B. (2008). A Rose by Any Other Name: Ne-oclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism, Security Studies, 17, 294-321.
Rittberger, B., Blauberger, Μ. (2018). Introducing the debate section: ‘The EU in crisis: EU studies in crisis?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 436-439. Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World Poli tics, 51(1), 144-172. Rossow, R. (1962). The Professionalization of the New Diplomacy, World Politics, 14 (4), 561-575. Rothkopf, DJ. (1998). Cyberpolitik: The Changing Nature of Power in the Infor mation Age, Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 22-46. Rüffin, N. (2020). EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level gover nance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action, Research Policy, 49 (1), article 103842. Ruffini, P-B. (2018). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Science-Diplomacy Nexus, Global Policy, 9 (3), ТЪ—П. Rumford, C., Murray, P. (2003). Globalization and the Limitations of European Integration Studies: Interdisciplinary Considerations, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 11, 85-93. Ryan, L. (2015). Governance of EU research policy: Charting forms of scientific democracy in the European Research Area, Science and Public Policy, 42, 300-314. Bibliografia 293
Rytövuori, H. (1980). Structures of Détente and Ecological Interdependence: Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Area for the Protection of Marine Environment and Living Resources, Cooperation and Conflict, 15, 85-102. Sauerland, К. (2006). Idea uniwersytetu - aktualność tradycji Humboldta?, Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2 (28), 89-96. Schlegel, F., Jacot, O., Fetscherin, Μ. (2011). Science diplomacy with swissnex China: A Swiss nation brand initiative, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Ί, 289-298. Schweller R.L. (2004). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of under balancing, International Security, 29 (2), 159-201. Scott, J. W. (2002). Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation, Journal of Baltic Studies, 33, 137-155. Shibata, A., Raita, Μ. (2016). An Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation: Only for the Eight Arctic States and Their Scientists? The Yearbook of Polar Law Online, 8 (1), 129-162. Simangan, D. (2020). Where is the Anthropocene? IR in a new geological epoch, International Affairs, 96 (1), 211-224. Sime, Z., Legzdiņš, Μ. (2018). Research and Higher Education Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region, Latvijas Intereses Eiropas Savienībā, 1, 45-65. Śmieszek, M. (2015). 25 Years of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC), Arctic Yearbook, 5, 437-444. Śmieszek, Μ. (2017). The Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation: From Paper to Practice, Arctic Yearbook, 6, 439-445. Starzyk-Sulejewska, J., (2016). Stosunki Unii Europejskiej z Organizacją Narodów Zjednoczonych
do spraw Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa, Stosunki Międzynarodowe, 4 (52), 91-109. Stein, J. A., Ahmed, A. (2007). The European Union as a Model of International Co-operation in Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 654-669. Steiner, B.H. (2004). Diplomacy and international theory, Review of International Studies, 30 (4), 493-509. Su, P., Mayer, Μ., (2018). Science Diplomacy and Trust Building: ‘Science China’ in the Arctic, Global Policy, 9 (3), 23-28. Sundin, B. (2005). Nature as heritage: the Swedish case, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11, 9-20. Sutcu, G. (2012). Evolution of diplomacy and the future of epistemic communities: scientists as the diplomats of the 21st century, European Scientific Journal, 26 (8), 240-259. Szkarłat Μ. (2020). Science diplomacy of Poland, Humanities and Social Science Communications, Ί, article number 59 (2020). Tassinari, F. (2005). The European sea: Lessons from the Baltic Sea region for security and cooperation in the European neighborhood, Journal of Baltic Studies, 36, 387-407. 294 -e- Bibliografia
Tesar, C., Dubois, M-А., Shestakov, A. (2016). Toward strategic, coherent, policy relevant arctic science, Science, 353 (6306), 1368-1370. Toivanen, H., Suominen, A. (2015). Epistemic integration of the European Rese arch Area: The shifting geography of the knowledge base of Finnish research, 1995-2010, Science and Public Policy, 42, 549-566. VanDeveer, S. D., Dabelko, G. D. (1999). Redefining security around the Baltic: environmental issues in regional context, Global Governance, 5, 221-249. Varela-Vazquez, P., González-López, Μ., del Carmen Sánchez-Carreira, Μ. (2019). The uneven regional distribution of projects funded by the EU Framework Pro grammes, Journal ofEntrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15,45-72. Wade, N. (1974). Kissinger on Science: Making the Linkage with Diplomacy, Sci ence, 184 (4138), 780-781. Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited, Public Relations Review, 32 (2), 91-6. Weingartner, K.A., Orttung, R.W. (2019). US Arctic policymaking under Trump and Obama, Polar Record, 55 (6), 402-410. Weiss, Ch. (2015). How Do Science and Technology Affect International Affairs?, Minerva 53, 411-430. Wohlforth, W.C. (1994/5). Realism and the End of the Cold War, International Security, 19 (3), 97-98. Yakushiji, T. (2009). The Potential of Science and Technology Diplomacy, AsiaPacific Review, 16(1), 1-7. Materiały internetowe Andreev, A. (2007). To What Extent Are International Organizations Autonomous Actors in World Politics?, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/opticonl826/archive/issue2/
VfPS_HS_International_Organisations.pdf (dostęp: 5.04. 2020). Arctic Council (1996). Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council. Joint Communique of the Governments of the Arctic Countries on the Establishment of the Arctic Council. Ottawa, Canada, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/ bitstream/handle/11374/85/EDOCS-1752-v2-ACMMCAOO_Ottawa_1996_Founding_Declaration.PDF?sequence=5 isAllowed=y (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2013). Arctic Council Rules of Procedure, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/940/2015-09-01_Rules_of_Procedure_ website_version.pdf?sequence=7 isAllowed=y (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2016). Task Force on Scientific Cooperation meets in Ottawa, https:// arctic-council.org/en/news/task-force-on-scientific-cooperation-meets-in-ottawa/, (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Arctic Council (2017). Arctic Council Ministers meet, sign binding agreement on sci ence cooperation, pass Chairmanship from U.S. to Finland, https://arctic-council. Bibliografia -^ 295
org/en/news/arctic-council-ministers-meet-sign-binding-agreement-on-science-cooperation-pass-chairmanship-from-u.s-to-finland/, (dostęp: 5.04.2019). Arctic Council (2020). Observers, https://arctic-council.org/en/about/observers/, (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). ARWU (2WS). Academic Ranking of World Universities, http://www.shanghairanking.com (dostęp: 17.07.2018). ASM2 (2018). Report of the 2nd Arctic Science Ministerial: Co-Operation in Arctic Science - Challenges and Joint Actions, https://www.arcticscienceministerial. org/files/190402_ASM2_Bericht_V2_bf.pdf (dostęp: 5.04. 2019). Berkman, P.A. (2014). Stability and Peace in the Arctic Ocean through Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy 3 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/stability_and_peace_in_the_arctic_ocean_through_science_diplomacy_science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 18.04.2018). Bindenagel Sehovič, A., (2018). Food Fights for Life: Food diplomacy forfood security, Proceedings of the 12th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection (IWCSPP) in Berlin, Germany, October 7-11, 2018, nr 463, https:// ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/10602/9671 (dostęp: 1.08.2020). Brandt, N. (2018). Strengthening innovation in Poland. OECD Economics Depart ment Working Papers. No. 1479, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ abf2c877-en.pdf?expires=1600509426 id=id accname=guest checksum= 6B3943CBAC5CBCAC04C6C86E93F3E72F (dostęp: 18.11.2019). BUP (n.d.). The Baltic University Programme - Uppsala University, Sweden, https://www.balticuniv.uu.se/ (dostęp: 18.07. 2019). Clary, D. C. (2013). A
Scientist in the Foreign Office, Science Diplomacy, 2(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/a_scientist_in_the_foreign_office_science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 18.11. 2015). Colglazier, E.W. (2017). Optimism, Pessimism, and Science Diplomacy. Science Diplomacy 6 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/optimism_pessimism_sciencediplomacy_june_2017.pdf (dostęp: 19.04.2019). Copeland, D. (2011). Science Diplomacy: What’s It All About?, https://www.cips-cepi. ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Copeland-Policy-Brief-Nov-ll-5.pdf (dostęp: 18.09.2019). Cordis (2014). WYZWANIA SPOŁECZNE - Europa w zmieniającym się świecie - integracyjne, innowacyjne i refleksyjne społeczeństwa, https://cordis.europa. eu/programme/id/H2020-EU.3.6./pl (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Cordis (2018). Science diplomacy for EU neighbourhoodpolicies, https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/H2020_ENG-GLOBALLY-04-2017 (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Cornut, J. (2017). The Practice Turn in International Relations Theory. W: Inter national studies Encyclopedia. R. Denemark, R. Marlin-Bennett (red.). New York: Oxford University Press, https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/ view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-113/ version/0?print=pdf (dostęp: 13.04.2020). 296 ^ Bibliografia
Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP) (2008). Toward the Reinforcement of Science and Technology Diplomacy, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/doc/s_ and_t_diplomacy/20080519_tow_the_reinforcement_of.pdf (dostęp: 30.07.2018). Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI) (2015). Brochure about the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation 2015 https://www8.cao.go.jp/ cstp/english/panhu/index.html (dostęp: 30.07.2018). Dąbrowska, A (2019). PiS ogtosil sklad nowego rządu. Jest kilka niespodzianek, Polityka. Available, https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1931454,l,pisoglosil-sklad-nowego-rzadu-jest-kilka-niespodzianek.read (dostęp: 28.12.2019). Dehgan, A., Colglazier, E.W. (2012). Development Science and Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 1(4), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/ files/development_science_and_science_diplomacy_science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2018). Industrial Strategy: building a Britainfitfor the future, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ industrial-strategy-building-a-britain-fit-for-the-future (dostęp: 10.03.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2020a). Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Ministerfor Science, Research and Innovation), https://www. gov.uk/government/ministers/parliamentary-under-secretary-of-state-minister-for-science-research-and-innovation (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Department for Business Energy Industrial Strategy (2020b). UKResearch and Development Roadmap,
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-research-and-development-roadmap (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Dolan, B. Μ. 2012. Science and Technology Agreements as Tools for Science Diplomacy. A U.S. Case Study. Science Diplomacy 1(4): 1-9, https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/science_and_technology_agreements_ as_tools_for_science_diplomacy_science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2019). ECOSOC (2001). Science and Technology for Development, Resolution 2001/31, https://www.un.org/ecosoc/sites/www.un.org.ecosoc/files/documents/2001/resolution-2001-31.pdf (dostęp: 15.07.2020). EOG (2017). Memorandum of Understanding w sprawie wdrażania Mechanizmu Finansowego EOG na lata 2014-2021, https://www.eog.gov.pl/media/89440/ Zalacznik_2_MoU.pdf (dostęp: 15.08.2019). Euractive.pl (2014). Pierwsze sankcje dla Szwajcarii, https://www.euractiv.pl/section/ polityka-zagraniczna/news/pierwsze-sankcje-dla-szwajcarii/ (dostęp 15.07.2020). European Commission (2005). EU/Russia: The four “Common Spaces, Memo/05/103, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_05_103 (dostęp: 30.12.2019). European Commission (2013). Roadmap for EU -Japan S T Cooperation, https:// ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/pdf/policy/jp_roadmap_2018.pdf (dostęp: 11.10.2019). European Commission (2019). European Innovation Scoreboard 2019, https:// op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/dl56a01b-9307-lle9-936901aa75ed71al/language-en/format-PDF/source-136061387 (dostęp: 15.02.2020). Bibliografia - *· 297
European Commission (2019c). Research, innovation and science policy experts group (RISE), https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/shaping-eu-research-and-innovation-policy/rise-group_en (dostęp: 29.07.2020). European Science Diplomacy Cluster (2020). The European Science Diplomacy Cluster, https://www.science-diplomacy.eu/ (dostęp: 30.07.2020). FAO (2009). Strategic Framework 2010-2019, C 2009/3, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/029/ k5864e01.pdf, (dostęp 20.07.2020). FAO (2Ά\2). FAO Attributes, Core Functions and Comparative Advantages, CL 144/14, Food and Agriculture Organization, http://www.fao.Org/3/md881E01/md881E01. pdf, (dostęp: 1.08.2020). FAO (2013). Reviewed Strategic Framework, C 2013/7, Food and Agriculture Orga nization of the United Nations, Rome, http://www.fao.Org/3/mg015e/mg015e.pdf (dostęp: 1.08.2020). FAO (2018). Transforming Food and Agriculture to Achieve the SDGs. 20 inter connected actions to guide policy-makers, FAO Rome, http://www.fao.Org/3/ I9900EN/i9900en.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2020). FAO (2018a). Meeting: Science diplomacy can improve regional peace while figh ting animal disease, http://www.fao.Org/europe/news/detail-news/en/c/1145566/ (dostęp: 23.08.2020). FAO (2020). Transforming the World through Food and Agriculture. FAO and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, FAO, Rome, http://www.fao.org/3/ ca5299enZca5299en.pdf (dostęp: 10.08.2020). FAO (2020a). FAO Worldwide Offices, https://coin.fao.org/cms/do/en/index.html (dostęp: 17.07.2020).
FAO (2020b). FAO Treaties Database, http://www.fao.org/treaties/results/en/?search=adv subj_coll=ArticleXIV, (dostęp: 15.07.2020). FAO (2020d). More scientific research is needs to ensure policies that enable access to healthy diets for all, http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1197433/icode/ (dostęp: 18.08.2020). FAO/WHO (2007/ 2018). FAO/WHO Framework for the Provision of Scientific Advice on food Safety and Nutrition, Rome, Geneva, http://www.fao.org/3/ i7494enZI7494EN.pdf (dostęp: 12.08.2020). Farrell, J. (2017). New Agreement to Enhance International Arctic Scientific Coop eration. ARCUS, https://www.arcus.Org/witness-the-arctic/2017/2/article/27780 , (dostęp: 03.07.2020). Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2018). Written Evidence ֊ Foreign and Com monwealth Office. FPW0027, http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/international-relations-committee/foreign-policy-in-changed-w ’orld-conditions/written/79900.html (dostęp: 13.09.2019). France Diplomatie (2019). Diplomatie scientifique, https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/ fr/politique-etrangere-de-la-france/diplomatie-scientifique/ (dostęp: 03.05.2019). 298 -^ Bibliografia
Frehill, L.M., Seely-Grant, К. (2016). International Research Collaborations: Scien tists Speak about Leveraging Science for Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 5(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/international_research_collaborations_science_diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 05.09.2019). Gluckman, P. (2017). Science Diplomacy - looking towards 2030, IIASA, 45th Anni versary Lecture, Vienna, Austria, https://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/17-1 l-14-Science-diplomacy-looking-towards-2030.pdf (dostęp: 30.07.2020). Gluckman, P.D., Turekian, V., Grimes, R.W., Kishi, T. (2017). Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside, Science Diplomacy, 6 (4), https:// www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/pragmatic_perspective_science_advice_dec2017_l.pdf (dostęp: 27.04.2019) Gorbaczow, Michail (1987). Mikhail Gorbachev’s speech in Murmansk at the cere monial meeting on the occasion of the presentation of the order of Lenin and the gold star to the city of Murmansk, https://www.barentsinfo.fi/docs/Gorbachev_speech.pdf (dostęp: 14.05.2019). Government Office for Science (2013). Future of the civil service: Making the most ofscientists and engineers, URN BIS/13/594ES, http://www.bis.gov.uk/go-science (dostęp: 14.11.2019). Government Office for Science (2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ government-office-for-science#content (dostęp: 03.05.2019). Government Office for Science (2020). Guidance for government Chief Scientific Advisers and their Officials. Chief Scientific Advisers and their officials: an introduction,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/856166/chief-scientific-advisers-and-their-officialsan-introduction.pdf (dostęp: 14.03.2020). Gual Soler, Μ. (2015). How I Became a Science Diplomat, https://slate.com/technology/2015/10/how-i-became-a-science-diplomat.html (dostęp: 14.04.2019). Heine, J. (2006). On the manner ofpractising the new diplomacy. Working paper 1/2006, https://www.cigionline.org/publications/manner-practising-new-diplomacy (dostęp: 4.12.2019). Harvard Medical School (2019). Timeline of Discovery, https://hms.harvard.edu/ about-hms/history-hms/timeline-discovery (dostęp: 27.04.2019). HM Government (2020a). Council for Science and Technology, https://www.gov. uk/government/organisations/council-for-science-and-technology (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government (2020b). Departments, agencies and public bodies, https://www. gov.uk/government/organisations (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government (2020c). Government Office for Science, https://www.gov.uk/ government/organisations/government-office-for-science (dostęp: 23.07.2020). HM Government, Department for Business, E. I. S. (2019). International Research and Innovation Strategy, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/801513/International-research-innovation-strategy-single-page.pdf (dostęp: 23.04.2020). Bibliografia -«֊ 299
Hollanders, H. i in. 1^2020). European Innovation Scoreboard2020, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en (dostęp: 15.04.2020). Holzeis, C.C. i in. (2019). New Models for Science Diplomacy Transcending Boundries: The InterAcademy Partnership Food and Nutrition Security and Agricul ture Project, Science Diplomacy 7(3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/canales_may _2019_0.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2020). Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Policy, (2011). Hungary’s Foreign Policy after the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, https://eu.kormany. hu/admin/download/f/lb/30000/foreign_policy _20111219.pdf (dostęp: 24.04.2019). IASC (1990). Founding Articles ofan InternationalArctic Science Committee. IASC, https://iasc.info/images/about/iasc-founding-articles.pdf (dostęp: 02.04.2020). IASC (2020a). Action Groups - International Arctic Science Committee, https://iasc. info/action-groups (dostęp: 16.12.2019). IASC (2020b). The IASC Handbookof Procedures Guidelines. Version: 23 March 2020, https://iasc.info/images/about/organization/IASC_Handbook_20200323. pdf (dostęp: 29.03.2020). IASC-CASP (2018). Communicating Arctic Science to Policy-Makers. Final Report of IASC Action Group, https://www.dropbox.eom/s/7nb93m7ozkmr7yb/A8_ CASP_Final_Report.pdf ?dl=0 (dostęp: 26.11.2019). IISD, (2013). Water Budapest Summit Budapest Water Summit Bulletin, A sum mary report, Vol 82 (27), https://enb.iisd.org/water/bws/html/crsvol82num27e. html (dostęp: 27.09.2020). International Council for Science ISCU (2015). ISCU Review of the
Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, Paris, https://council.science/ wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SDG-Report.pdf (dostęp: 11.04.2020). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (1970). Report of the ICES Working Group on Pollution of the Baltic Sea. ICES Cooperative Research Report, Series A,no., 15, http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/CM%20Doccuments/1976/ Gen/1976_Gen2.pdf (dostęp: 26.04.2020). International Space Station (2017). About the International Space Station, http:// www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/International_ Space_Station/About_the_International_Space_Station (dostęp: 15.03.2019). Irwin, N. (2016). What Was the Greatest Era for Innovation? A Brief Guided Tour, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/upshot/what-wasthe-greatest-era-for-american-innovation-a-brief-guided-tour.html (dostęp: 1.05.2019). Kaiser, R., Prange, H. (2002). A New Concept ofDeepening European Integration? The European Research Area and the Emerging Role of Policy Coordination in a Multi-Level Governance System, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=344320 (dostęp: 14.05.2020). Knight, J. (2018). Knowledge Diplomacy. A Bridge Linking International Higher Education and Research tritìi International Relations. Discussion Paper, https:// www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/kno.pdf (dostęp: 11.10.2019). 300 -^ Bibliografia
Kormany.hu. (2020). Tudománydiplomácia, https://2010-2014.kormany.hu/hu/ kulugyminiszterium/eu-ketoldali-kapcsolatokert-es-kulturalis-diplomaciaer t-felelos-helyettes-allamtitkarsag/felelossegi-teruletek/tudomanydiplomacia (dostęp: 25.09.2020). Komisja Europejska (2015). Science diplomacy for EU neighbourhood policies, https:// ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/ topic-details/eng-globally-04-2017 (dostęp: 30.07.2020). КРК (2018). Aspekty finansowe i prawne w programie Horyzont 2020: Co trzeba wiedzieć, żeby prawidłowo skalkulować budżet, zrealizować i rozliczyćprojekt wH2020, http://www.kpk.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Poradnik-H2020 . pdf (dostęp: 14.07.2020). KPK (2019). Krajowy Punkt Kontaktowy, http://www.kpk.gov.pl/?page_id=21437 (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Krasnyak, O. (2017). The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Ideal Science Diplomacy CPD Blog, https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/apollo-soyuz-test-project-ideal-science-diplomacy (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Krasnyak, O. (2018). National Styles in Science Diplomacy: The U.S.’, CPD Blog, https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/national-styles-science-diplomacy-us (dostęp: 23.05.2020). Kryszewski, W., Pszczolowski, T. (2019). Nauka. Encyklopedia PWN, https:// encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/nauka;3946164.html (dostęp: 09.05.2019). Kryszewski, W., Pszczolowski, T. (2019). Technika. Encyklopedia PWN, https:// encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/technika;3985955.html (dostęp: 09.05. 2019). Łuszczuk, Μ. (2016). Informacja na temat spotkania Ministrów Nauki w spra wie badań arktycznych (Waszyngton, USA, 28
września 2016), Polish Polar Consortium, http://www.pkpolar.pl/konsorcjum/informacja-na-temat-spotkania-ministrow-nauki-w-sprawie-badan-arktycznych-waszyngton-d-c-usa-28wrzesnia-2016/ (dostęp: 23.01.2019). Markusz K. (2Á№). Right-wing groups in Poland say Holocaust conference anti-Polish, The Times of Isreal, 18 February 2019, https://www.timesofisrael.com/right-winggroups-in-poland-say-holocaust-conference-anti-polish/ (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Mauduit, J-C. (2017). Open Skies Policies in Astronomy: The Growing Need for Diplomacy on the Final Frontier, Science Diplomacy, 6(2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/observations_diplomacy_and_the_future_ of_ocean_governance_updated_0.pdf (dostęp: 27.04.2019). МЕТІ (2019). Bilateral Agreements on Cooperation in Science and Technology, and Joint Committees, https://www.meti.go.jp/english/policy/economy/industrial_technology/pdf/0123_04.pdf (dostęp: 20.09.2019). Międzyresortowy zespól ds. promocji Polski za granicą (2018). Marka Polska koncepcja, https://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/a80elcff-2515-449c-8e0e-dc2f59da9al8:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, MNiSW (2020). Partnerzy w edukacji: Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Bibliografia 301
Akademickiej oraz Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji zacieśniają współpra cę, https://www.gov.pl/web/nauka/partnerzy-w-edukacji-ministerstwo-nauki-iszkolnictwa-wyzszego-narodowa-agencja-wymiany-akademickiej-oraz-fundacjarozwoju-systemu-edukacji-zaciesniaja-wspolprace (dostęp: 07.07.2020). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2015). Rządowy program współpracy z Polonią i Polakami za granicą w 1. 2015-2020, https://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/70a7021e-304c-4075-a812-18e5b3410966:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2016). Zarządzenie nr 24Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych z dnia 11 lipea 2016 w sprawie Rady Dyplomacji Historycz nej, http://g.ekspert.infor.pl/p/_dane/akty_pdf/U31/2016/27/32.pdf#zoom=90 (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Kierunki promocji Polski na lata 2017-27, https://msz.gov.p1/resource/4799f322-27f3-4563-a7ce-74bf8a5c88d6:JCR (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Strategia polskiej polityki zagra nicznej na 1. 2017-21, https://msz.gov.pl/resource/978285e3-5684-4fcb-8d7e-d0a8bfdb0fdb:JCR (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2017). Zadania administracji rządowej na l. 2017-18 w ramach realizacji Rządowego programu współpracy z Polonią i Polakami zagranicą w Լ 2015-20, https://msz.gov.pl/resource/c6ae2987-48f84dlf-a39f-874fa5f61467:JCR (dostęp: 20.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). „Polska jest w Tobie” - 250 młodych łudzi z całego świata przyleci do Polski, by poznać kraj przodków, https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/polska-jest-w-
tobie-250-mlodych-ludzi֊zcalego-swiata-przyleci-do-polski-by-poznac-kraj-przodkow (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Ambasada RP w Tokio, https:// tokio.msz.gov.pl/ (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2W)). Ambasada RP w Waszyngtonie, https://waszyngton.msz.gov.pl/pl/ (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Dyplomacja publiczna, https://www. msz.gov.pl/pl/polityka_zagraniczna/dyplomacja_publiczna/ (dostęp: 19.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Dzień Polonii i Polaków za Gra nicą, https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/dzien-polonii-i-polakow-za-granica (dostęp: 26.08.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Internetowa Baza Traktatowa, https://traktaty.msz.gov.pl/umowa-l (dostęp: 09.11.2019). Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, MSZ (2019). Międzyresortowy zespól ds. promo cji Polski za granicą, https://www.msz.gov.p1/pl/p/msz_pl/polityka_zagraniczna/ dyplomacja_publiczna/miedzyresportowy_zespol_promocji_polski/ _ rp0x2Content!335370@20954_pageNo/2 (dostęp: 09.11.2019). Moedas, C. (2016). Science Diplomacy in the European Union, Science Diplo macy, 5(1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/science_diplomacy_in_the_european_union_science _ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2020). 302 -^ Bibliografia
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej, NAWA (2018). NAWA, Zarys strategii na lata 2018-2025, https://nawa.gov.pl/images/Strategia-NAWA.pdf (dostęp: 20.06.2020). Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej, NAWA (2019). Doradca ds. Nauki i Technologii Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych, https://nawa.gov.pl/nawa/rada-nawa/sklad-osobowy-rady/360-prof-marek-konarzewski (dostęp: 15.07.2019). Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, NCBiR (2019). Programy międzynarodo we, https://www.ncbr.gov.pl/programy/programy-miedzynarodowe/ (dostęp: 09.11.2019). National Institutes of Health (2019). NIH Research Highlights 2019, https://www. nih.gov/research-training/nih-research-highlightsa (dostęp: 10.11.2019). National Science Board (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018: R D Expenditures and R D Intensity, https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/ report/sections/overview/r-d-expenditures-and-r-d-intensity (dostęp: 10.04.2019). Newton Fund (2020). Newton Fund, http://www.newtonfund.ac.uk/ (dostęp: 18.06.2020). NRDalO, (2020). Hungary cooperating with international research infrastructures and professional organizations, https://nkfih.gov.hu/about-the-office/hungary-cooperating-with (dostęp: 27.09.2020). Payette, J. (2012). Research and Diplomacy 350 Kilometers Above the Earth, Sci ence Diplomacy, 1(4), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ research_and_diplomacy_350_kilometers_above_the_earth_science _ diplomacy, pdf (dostęp: 12.04.2019). Penca, J. (2018). The rhetoric of “science diplomacy”: Innovation for the EU’s scientific cooperation? (EL-CSID Working Paper 16),
https://docs.wixstatic. Com/ugd/0bc3be_e75b3b2ed47a4f7da3534e30d7f5747e.pdf (dostęp: 12.07.2020). PIASt (2019). Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych (PIASt), www.piast.pan. pl (dostęp: 25.07.2019). Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs History (2019). https://pugwash. org/history/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Rüffin N., Schreiterer U. (2017). Case Study. Science and technology agreements in the toolbox of science diplomacy: Effective instruments or insignificant add ons? EL-CSID Working Paper Issue 2017/6 September 2017, http://aei.pitt. edu/92501/l/EL%2DCSID_WorkingPaper_2017%2D06_Science_and_technology_agreements.pdf (dostęp: 14.11.2019). Ruffini, P-B. (2020). France’s Science Diplomacy, Science Diplomacy, 9 (2), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ruffini_june_2020.pdf (dostęp: 03.04.2020). Sato, Y., Hirokazu K., Tateo A. (2014). Building the Foundations for Scientific Advice in the International Context, Science Diplomacy, 3 (3), https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/building_the_foundations_for_scientific_advice_in_the_international_context_science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 12.04.2019). Bibliografia -^ 303
Scotland’s National Academy (2020). The Royal Society ofEdinburgh, https://www. rse.org.uk/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). Sime, Z. (2018). Council of the Baltic Sea States : The Role of a Sustainable and Prosperous Region in Bringing Science Diplomacy Forward (No. 19), https:// docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/7dd3ca_6f7f6a0617764ae2a6f57922e3de0f29.pdf (dostęp: 12.02.2020). Stephen, K. (2016). A Legacy of Science Cooperation for Future Generations: The White House Arctic Science Ministerial, http://www.thearcticinstitute.org/ white-house-arctic-science-ministerial/ (dostęp: 07.06.2020). Sunami, A. (2016). Japan’s Science and Technology Diplomacy. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegie-mec.org/2016/02/10/japan-s-science-and-technology-diplomacy-pub-63476 (dostęp: 23.10.2018). Sunami, A., Hamachi T., Kitaba S. (2013). The Rise of Science and Technology Diplomacy in Japan, Science Diplomacy, 2 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy . org/sites/default/files/the_rise_of_science_and_technology_diplomacy_in_japan_ science_ diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 14.08.2019). The Academy of Medical Sciences (2020). The Academy of Medical Sciences, https://acmedsci.ac.uk/about (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The British Academy (2020). About the British Academy, https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Danish Government (2018). New Danish Foreign and Security Policy Strategy 2019-2020, https://um.dk/~/media/um/danish-site/documents/udenrigspolitik/ aktuelle%20emner/udenrigs%20og%20sikkerhedspolitik/2019-20/foreign%20 and%20security%20policy%20strategy%202019-2020.pdf (dostęp:
11.04.2020). The Learned Society of Wales (2020). About the Learned Society of Wales, https:// www.learnedsociety.wales/about-us/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Academy of Engineering (2020). Policy, https://www.raeng.org.uk/policy (dostęp: 23 July 2020). The Royal Irish Academy (2020). About The Royal Irish Academy, https://www. ria.ie/about (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2015). UK research and the European Union. The role of the EU in funding UK research, https://royalsociety.Org/~/media/policy/projects/ eu-uk-funding/uk-membership-of-eu.pdf (dostęp: 18.07.2020). The Royal Society (2018). Submission to the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee Brexit Science and Innovation Summit. The Royal Society (2019a). Royal Society Submission to the Sir Adrian Smith Call for Evidence on Future Frameworks for International Collaboration on Research and Innovation, https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/Publications/2019/31-05-19-royal-society-submission-to-sir-adrian-smith-review.pdf (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2019b). Why the UK Must Associate to Horizon Europe, https:// royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2019/why-the-uk-must-associate-tohorizon-europe/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). 304 ^ Bibliografia
The Royal Society (2020a). About the Royal Society, https://royalsociety.org/aboutus/ (dostęp: 23.07.2020). The Royal Society (2020b). Policy Associate Scheme, https://royalsociety.org/grantsschemes-awards/policy-secondment-programme/ (dostęp: 24.07.2020). The White House (2015). President Obama’s Trip to Alaska, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/2015-alaska-trip (dostęp: 05.07.2020). The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2016). Fact sheet: United States Hosts First-EverArctic Science Ministerial to Advance International Research Efforts, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/28/fact-sheetunited-states-hosts-first-ever-arctic-science-ministerial (dostęp: 05.07.2020). Turekian, V. C., T. Kishi. 2017. Science and Technology Advising in Today’s For eign Policy, Science Diplomacy 6 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/ default/files/science_and_technology_advising_in_todays_foreign_policy_science_ diplomacy_0.pdf (dostęp: 02.06.2017). Turekian, V., Gluckman P., Kishi T, Grimes R. (2018). Science Diplomacy: A Prag matic Perspective from the Inside, Science Diplomacy 6 (4), https://www. sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/pragmatic_perspective_science_advice_ dec2017_l.pdf (dostęp: 16.01.2018). Turekian, V., Neureiter N. (2012). Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue, Science Diplomacy 1 (1), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/ science_and_diplomacy.pdf (dostęp: 19.04.2019). UK Research and Innovation (2018). Strategic Prospectus: Building the UKRI Strategy. Insight, Inspiration, Impact. United Kingdom,
https://www.ukri.org/ about-us/strategic-prospectus/ (dostęp: 22.07.2020). UK Science and Innovation Network (2020). UK Science and Innovation Network, https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovation-network (dostęp: 24.07.2020). Ulnicane, I. (2014). Europe of Knowledge 2014: High Expectations and Complex Realities I Europe ofKnowledge, https://era.ideasoneurope.eu/2014/01/07/europeof-knowledge-2014-high-expectations-and-complex-realities/ (dostęp: 9.07.2020). UN Security Council (2018). Resolution 2417 (2018), S/RES/24171(2018), https:// undocs.org/S/RES/2417(2018) (dostęp: 20.08.2020). UNESCO (2019). Science, technology and innovation. Research and develop ment spending, http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SCN_ DS lang=en (dostęp: 16.04.2019). UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2018). How Much Your Country Invests in R D, http://uis.unesco.org/apps/visualisations/research-and-development-spending/ (dostęp: 16.04.2019). US Advisory Commission On Public Diplomacy 2018 (2018). Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting, https://www.state. gov/documents/organization/287683.pdf (dostęp: 16.04.2019). US Agency for International Development (2019). Science at USAID, https://www.usaid.gov/ what-we-do/science-technolog-and-innovation/science-usaid (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Bibliografia ■*֊ 305
US Department of State (2015). History and Mission of ECA, http://eca.state.gov/ about-bureau/history-and-mission-eca (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019a). U.S. Science Envoy Program, https://www.state. gov/e/oes/stc/scienceenvoy/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019b). Innovation Forum, https://2009-2017.state.gOv/s/d/ innovation (dostęp: 27.04.2019). US Department of State (2019c). The Secretary’s Office of Global Partnerships, https://www.state.gOv/s/partnerships/ (dostęp: 27.04.2019). Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Tools for an EU Science Diplomacy, http://cris.unu. edu/sites/cris.unu.edu/files/Tools%20for%20an%20EU%20Science%20Diplomacy%20~%20Luk%20Van%20Langenhove.pdf (dostęp: 3.06.2017). Wengenroth, U. (2000). Science, Technology, and Industry in the 19th Century, http://www.mzwtg.mwn.tum.de/fileadmin/wOObmt/www/Arbeitspapiere/Wengenroth_sci-tech-ind-19c.pdf (dostęp 10.04.2019). Wilton Park (2019). Wilton Park. An Executive Agency of the Foreign and Common wealth Office. Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19, https://www.wiltonpark.org . uk/wp-content/uploads/Wilton-Park-annual-reports-and-accounts-2018-2019. pdf (dostęp: 22.07.2020). Witze, A. (2017). Trump agenda threatens US legacy of science diplomacy, Nature News and Comments, 27 January, https://www.nature.com/news/trump-agenda-threatens-us-legacy-of-science-diplomacy-1.21382 (dostęp: 18.04.2019). Wolfe, A. (2015). When Scientists Do What Diplomats Can’t, The Atlantic, Sep. 26, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/09/science-diplomacy/ (dostęp: 16.04.2019). World Atlas
(2019). Countries With The Most Nobel Laureates In Physiology And Medicine, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-most-nobel-laureates-in-physiology-and-medicine.html (dostęp: 17.04.2019). World Trade Organisation (WTO). 2019. Regional Trade Agreements Database. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rta_participation_map_e.htm Wren, K. (2014). Science Diplomacy Visit to Cuba Produces Historic Agreement, American Association for the Advancement of Science News. Published on 29th April at: https://www.aaas.org/news/science-diplomacy-visit-cuba-produces-historic-agreement(Accessed: 27 April 2019). Zgromadzenie Ogólne Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych (ftìW). Przekształca my nasz świat. Agenda na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030, A/RES/70/1, https://www.un.org.pl/agenda-2030-rezolucja (dostęp: 20.07.2020). 306 Bibliografia |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Szkarłat, Monika 1979- Łuszczu, Michał Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno 1949- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1121623972 (DE-588)1276277814 (DE-588)170116344 |
| author_facet | Szkarłat, Monika 1979- Łuszczu, Michał Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno 1949- |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Szkarłat, Monika 1979- |
| author_variant | m s ms m ł mł p b r pbr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048579233 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1376412480 (DE-599)BVBBV048579233 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03718nam a2200853 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048579233</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221124s2020 |||| 00||| pol d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788322794654</subfield><subfield code="9">978-83-227-9465-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8322794657</subfield><subfield code="9">83-227-9465-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1376412480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048579233</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HIST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Szkarłat, Monika</subfield><subfield code="d">1979-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1121623972</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dyplomacja naukowa</subfield><subfield code="b">koncepcja - praktyka</subfield><subfield code="c">Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lublin</subfield><subfield code="b">Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">319 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 273-306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zusammenfassungen der Beiträge englisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diplomatie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012402-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140181-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Außenbeziehungen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143618-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Kooperation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120503-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ungarn</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078541-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046496-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dyplomacja</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nauka</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Organizacje międzynarodowe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Polityka międzynarodowa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Współpraca naukowo-techniczna</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Francja</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Japonia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Polska</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Stany Zjednoczone (USA)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Węgry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Wielka Brytania</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nauka i stosunki międzynarodowe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Praca zbiorowa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046496-9</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ungarn</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078541-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Internationale Kooperation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120503-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140181-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="a">Diplomatie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012402-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="9"><subfield code="a">Außenbeziehungen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143618-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Łuszczu, Michał</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1276277814</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno</subfield><subfield code="d">1949-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)170116344</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230519</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033955144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">439</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Ungarn (DE-588)4078541-5 gnd USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 gnd Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Ungarn USA Polen Frankreich Großbritannien |
| id | DE-604.BV048579233 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:04:19Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:42:02Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788322794654 8322794657 |
| language | Polish |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033955144 |
| oclc_num | 1376412480 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 319 Seiten 24 cm |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20230519 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Szkarłat, Monika 1979- Verfasser (DE-588)1121623972 aut Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur Lublin Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 2020 319 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverzeichnis Seite 273-306 Zusammenfassungen der Beiträge englisch Diplomatie (DE-588)4012402-2 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd rswk-swf Außenbeziehungen (DE-588)4143618-0 gnd rswk-swf Internationale Kooperation (DE-588)4120503-0 gnd rswk-swf Ungarn (DE-588)4078541-5 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 gnd rswk-swf Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Dyplomacja Nauka Organizacje międzynarodowe Polityka międzynarodowa Współpraca naukowo-techniczna Francja Japonia Polska Stany Zjednoczone (USA) Węgry Wielka Brytania Nauka i stosunki międzynarodowe Praca zbiorowa (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 g Ungarn (DE-588)4078541-5 g Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 g Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 s Internationale Kooperation (DE-588)4120503-0 s Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 s Diplomatie (DE-588)4012402-2 s Außenbeziehungen (DE-588)4143618-0 s DE-604 Łuszczu, Michał Verfasser (DE-588)1276277814 aut Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno 1949- Verfasser (DE-588)170116344 aut Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Szkarłat, Monika 1979- Łuszczu, Michał Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno 1949- Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka Diplomatie (DE-588)4012402-2 gnd Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd Außenbeziehungen (DE-588)4143618-0 gnd Internationale Kooperation (DE-588)4120503-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4012402-2 (DE-588)4066562-8 (DE-588)4140181-5 (DE-588)4143618-0 (DE-588)4120503-0 (DE-588)4078541-5 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4046496-9 (DE-588)4018145-5 (DE-588)4022153-2 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka |
| title_auth | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka |
| title_exact_search | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka |
| title_full | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur |
| title_fullStr | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja - praktyka Monika Szkarłat, Michał Łuszczuk, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, Katarzyna Marzęda-Młynarska, Katarzyna Pisarska, Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Karzimierz Musiał, Grzegorz Mazur |
| title_short | Dyplomacja naukowa |
| title_sort | dyplomacja naukowa koncepcja praktyka |
| title_sub | koncepcja - praktyka |
| topic | Diplomatie (DE-588)4012402-2 gnd Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd Außenbeziehungen (DE-588)4143618-0 gnd Internationale Kooperation (DE-588)4120503-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Diplomatie Wissenschaft Wissenschaftspolitik Außenbeziehungen Internationale Kooperation Ungarn USA Polen Frankreich Großbritannien Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033955144&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT szkarłatmonika dyplomacjanaukowakoncepcjapraktyka AT łuszczumichał dyplomacjanaukowakoncepcjapraktyka AT ruffinipierrebruno dyplomacjanaukowakoncepcjapraktyka |