Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
İstanbul
İber Akademi Press
2022
|
Ausgabe: | 1st edition |
Schriftenreihe: | İber Akademi Press
2 İber Akademi Press : Islamic Philosophy Series 1 |
Schlagworte: | |
Beschreibung: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 285-290 In Suhraward?'s Criticism of the Philosophy of Ibn S?n?, Tahir Uluç conducts an epistemological discussion on the relation between philosophy and mysticism. In this context, he aims to go beyond the common opinion, which assumes that in Islamic thought, philosophy depends mostly on rational means in its quest for truth, theology rests primarily on revelation and Sufism on mystical experience and vision. Throughout his study, he investigates the following question: Are the legitimate domains of operation of philosophy and mysticism as clearly distinguished from each other as this assumption suggests, or do they share a common domain? In answering this question, he suggests that Suhraward?'s intention by this criticism is not to eradicate speculative philosophy in general and Peripateticism in particular, unlike the case in Ghaz?l?, but to transform it into a theoretical basis upon which to build his own Illuminative (Ishr?q?) system. In fact, Suhraward? clarifies that one cannot understand the ?ikmat al-Ishr?q, in which he provides a full exposition of his overall philosophical project unless one is well versed in the Peripatetic philosophy. In this perspective, Uluç demonstrates how the criticism of Peripateticism is an essential and integral part of Suhraward?'s endeavor to build a theoretical basis for his Illuminative philosophy, which depends primarily on mystical experience and vision. Accordingly, this book has a twofold purpose. First, it examines from what epistemological point of view Suhraward? finds the Peripatetic philosophy inadequate and on which principles he criticizes it. Secondly, it presents an in-depth analysis of how Suhraward?, who regards himself as a philosopher and his endeavor as philosophical, transforms the Peripatetic philosophy into an instrument and prelude that would serve the Illuminative philosophy |
Beschreibung: | 294 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9786257249560 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048564010 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20231212 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 221116s2022 tu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9786257249560 |9 978-625-7249-56-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1352877022 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048564010 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a tu |c TR | ||
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Uluç, Tahir |d 1977- |0 (DE-588)1312406364 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |c Tahir Uluç |
250 | |a 1st edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a İstanbul |b İber Akademi Press |c 2022 | |
300 | |a 294 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a İber Akademi Press |v 2 | |
490 | 0 | |a İber Akademi Press : Islamic Philosophy Series |v 1 | |
500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 285-290 | ||
500 | |a In Suhraward?'s Criticism of the Philosophy of Ibn S?n?, Tahir Uluç conducts an epistemological discussion on the relation between philosophy and mysticism. In this context, he aims to go beyond the common opinion, which assumes that in Islamic thought, philosophy depends mostly on rational means in its quest for truth, theology rests primarily on revelation and Sufism on mystical experience and vision. Throughout his study, he investigates the following question: Are the legitimate domains of operation of philosophy and mysticism as clearly distinguished from each other as this assumption suggests, or do they share a common domain? In answering this question, he suggests that Suhraward?'s intention by this criticism is not to eradicate speculative philosophy in general and Peripateticism in particular, unlike the case in Ghaz?l?, but to transform it into a theoretical basis upon which to build his own Illuminative (Ishr?q?) system. In fact, Suhraward? clarifies that one cannot understand the ?ikmat al-Ishr?q, in which he provides a full exposition of his overall philosophical project unless one is well versed in the Peripatetic philosophy. In this perspective, Uluç demonstrates how the criticism of Peripateticism is an essential and integral part of Suhraward?'s endeavor to build a theoretical basis for his Illuminative philosophy, which depends primarily on mystical experience and vision. Accordingly, this book has a twofold purpose. First, it examines from what epistemological point of view Suhraward? finds the Peripatetic philosophy inadequate and on which principles he criticizes it. Secondly, it presents an in-depth analysis of how Suhraward?, who regards himself as a philosopher and his endeavor as philosophical, transforms the Peripatetic philosophy into an instrument and prelude that would serve the Illuminative philosophy | ||
600 | 0 | 7 | |a Avicenna |d 980-1037 |0 (DE-588)118505254 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- |d 1097-1168 |0 (DE-588)104063467 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- |d 1097-1168 |0 (DE-588)104063467 |D p |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Avicenna |d 980-1037 |0 (DE-588)118505254 |D p |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Tali, Savaṣ Cihangir |4 edt | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033940140 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184579892838401 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Uluç, Tahir 1977- |
author2 | Tali, Savaṣ Cihangir |
author2_role | edt |
author2_variant | s c t sc sct |
author_GND | (DE-588)1312406364 |
author_facet | Uluç, Tahir 1977- Tali, Savaṣ Cihangir |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Uluç, Tahir 1977- |
author_variant | t u tu |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048564010 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1352877022 (DE-599)BVBBV048564010 |
edition | 1st edition |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03223nam a2200397 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048564010</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231212 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221116s2022 tu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786257249560</subfield><subfield code="9">978-625-7249-56-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1352877022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048564010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">tu</subfield><subfield code="c">TR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uluç, Tahir</subfield><subfield code="d">1977-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1312406364</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā</subfield><subfield code="c">Tahir Uluç</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">İstanbul</subfield><subfield code="b">İber Akademi Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">294 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">İber Akademi Press</subfield><subfield code="v">2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">İber Akademi Press : Islamic Philosophy Series</subfield><subfield code="v">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 285-290</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Suhraward?'s Criticism of the Philosophy of Ibn S?n?, Tahir Uluç conducts an epistemological discussion on the relation between philosophy and mysticism. In this context, he aims to go beyond the common opinion, which assumes that in Islamic thought, philosophy depends mostly on rational means in its quest for truth, theology rests primarily on revelation and Sufism on mystical experience and vision. Throughout his study, he investigates the following question: Are the legitimate domains of operation of philosophy and mysticism as clearly distinguished from each other as this assumption suggests, or do they share a common domain? In answering this question, he suggests that Suhraward?'s intention by this criticism is not to eradicate speculative philosophy in general and Peripateticism in particular, unlike the case in Ghaz?l?, but to transform it into a theoretical basis upon which to build his own Illuminative (Ishr?q?) system. In fact, Suhraward? clarifies that one cannot understand the ?ikmat al-Ishr?q, in which he provides a full exposition of his overall philosophical project unless one is well versed in the Peripatetic philosophy. In this perspective, Uluç demonstrates how the criticism of Peripateticism is an essential and integral part of Suhraward?'s endeavor to build a theoretical basis for his Illuminative philosophy, which depends primarily on mystical experience and vision. Accordingly, this book has a twofold purpose. First, it examines from what epistemological point of view Suhraward? finds the Peripatetic philosophy inadequate and on which principles he criticizes it. Secondly, it presents an in-depth analysis of how Suhraward?, who regards himself as a philosopher and his endeavor as philosophical, transforms the Peripatetic philosophy into an instrument and prelude that would serve the Illuminative philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Avicenna</subfield><subfield code="d">980-1037</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118505254</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as-</subfield><subfield code="d">1097-1168</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)104063467</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as-</subfield><subfield code="d">1097-1168</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)104063467</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Avicenna</subfield><subfield code="d">980-1037</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118505254</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tali, Savaṣ Cihangir</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033940140</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048564010 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T21:00:50Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:41:35Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9786257249560 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033940140 |
oclc_num | 1352877022 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 294 Seiten |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
publisher | İber Akademi Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | İber Akademi Press İber Akademi Press : Islamic Philosophy Series |
spelling | Uluç, Tahir 1977- (DE-588)1312406364 aut Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā Tahir Uluç 1st edition İstanbul İber Akademi Press 2022 294 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier İber Akademi Press 2 İber Akademi Press : Islamic Philosophy Series 1 Literaturverzeichnis Seite 285-290 In Suhraward?'s Criticism of the Philosophy of Ibn S?n?, Tahir Uluç conducts an epistemological discussion on the relation between philosophy and mysticism. In this context, he aims to go beyond the common opinion, which assumes that in Islamic thought, philosophy depends mostly on rational means in its quest for truth, theology rests primarily on revelation and Sufism on mystical experience and vision. Throughout his study, he investigates the following question: Are the legitimate domains of operation of philosophy and mysticism as clearly distinguished from each other as this assumption suggests, or do they share a common domain? In answering this question, he suggests that Suhraward?'s intention by this criticism is not to eradicate speculative philosophy in general and Peripateticism in particular, unlike the case in Ghaz?l?, but to transform it into a theoretical basis upon which to build his own Illuminative (Ishr?q?) system. In fact, Suhraward? clarifies that one cannot understand the ?ikmat al-Ishr?q, in which he provides a full exposition of his overall philosophical project unless one is well versed in the Peripatetic philosophy. In this perspective, Uluç demonstrates how the criticism of Peripateticism is an essential and integral part of Suhraward?'s endeavor to build a theoretical basis for his Illuminative philosophy, which depends primarily on mystical experience and vision. Accordingly, this book has a twofold purpose. First, it examines from what epistemological point of view Suhraward? finds the Peripatetic philosophy inadequate and on which principles he criticizes it. Secondly, it presents an in-depth analysis of how Suhraward?, who regards himself as a philosopher and his endeavor as philosophical, transforms the Peripatetic philosophy into an instrument and prelude that would serve the Illuminative philosophy Avicenna 980-1037 (DE-588)118505254 gnd rswk-swf Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- 1097-1168 (DE-588)104063467 gnd rswk-swf Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- 1097-1168 (DE-588)104063467 p Avicenna 980-1037 (DE-588)118505254 p DE-604 Tali, Savaṣ Cihangir edt |
spellingShingle | Uluç, Tahir 1977- Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā Avicenna 980-1037 (DE-588)118505254 gnd Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- 1097-1168 (DE-588)104063467 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)118505254 (DE-588)104063467 |
title | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |
title_auth | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |
title_exact_search | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |
title_exact_search_txtP | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |
title_full | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā Tahir Uluç |
title_fullStr | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā Tahir Uluç |
title_full_unstemmed | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā Tahir Uluç |
title_short | Suhrawardī's criticism of the philosophy of Ibn Sīnā |
title_sort | suhrawardi s criticism of the philosophy of ibn sina |
topic | Avicenna 980-1037 (DE-588)118505254 gnd Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- 1097-1168 (DE-588)104063467 gnd |
topic_facet | Avicenna 980-1037 Suhrawardī, ʿAbd-al-Qāhir Ibn-ʿAbdallāh as- 1097-1168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uluctahir suhrawardiscriticismofthephilosophyofibnsina AT talisavascihangir suhrawardiscriticismofthephilosophyofibnsina |