Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin:
"If you read a work by Cicero or Seneca and then open The Pilgrimage of Egeria, Augustine, or Gregory of Tours, you will soon notice that Late Latin authors quote authorities differently. They provide a perfect example of synthesising two potentially conflicting traditions - "classical&quo...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden ; Boston
Brill
[2022]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | The language of classical literature
volume 37 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "If you read a work by Cicero or Seneca and then open The Pilgrimage of Egeria, Augustine, or Gregory of Tours, you will soon notice that Late Latin authors quote authorities differently. They provide a perfect example of synthesising two potentially conflicting traditions - "classical" and "biblical". This book examines how the system of direct discourse marking developed over the centuries. It focuses on selecting marking means, presents the dynamics of change and suggests factors that might have been at play. The author guides the reader on the path that goes from the Classical prevalence of inquit to the Late innovative mix of marking words including the very classical inquit, an increased use of dico, the newly recruited ait, and dicens, influenced by biblical translations. The book suggests that Late authors tried to make reading and understanding easier by putting quotative words before quotations and increasing the use of redundant combinations (e.g. "he answered saying")" |
| Beschreibung: | VIII, 147 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9789004524996 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048509164 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230714 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 221012s2022 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004524996 |c hardback |9 978-90-04-52499-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1355306339 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048509164 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-384 |a DE-12 |a DE-M100 | ||
| 084 | |a ALT |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a FT 11800 |0 (DE-625)34367: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a FN 4537 |0 (DE-625)34196: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mikulová, Jana |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)127531161X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |c by Jana Mikulová |
| 264 | 1 | |a Leiden ; Boston |b Brill |c [2022] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2022 | |
| 300 | |a VIII, 147 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a The language of classical literature |v volume 37 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "If you read a work by Cicero or Seneca and then open The Pilgrimage of Egeria, Augustine, or Gregory of Tours, you will soon notice that Late Latin authors quote authorities differently. They provide a perfect example of synthesising two potentially conflicting traditions - "classical" and "biblical". This book examines how the system of direct discourse marking developed over the centuries. It focuses on selecting marking means, presents the dynamics of change and suggests factors that might have been at play. The author guides the reader on the path that goes from the Classical prevalence of inquit to the Late innovative mix of marking words including the very classical inquit, an increased use of dico, the newly recruited ait, and dicens, influenced by biblical translations. The book suggests that Late authors tried to make reading and understanding easier by putting quotative words before quotations and increasing the use of redundant combinations (e.g. "he answered saying")" | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Literatur |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Latein |0 (DE-588)4114364-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Direkte Rede |0 (DE-588)4012417-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Latin language / Discourse analysis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Discourse markers | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Direct discourse in literature | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Rede |0 (DE-2581)TH000005211 |2 gbd | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Lateinische Sprache |0 (DE-2581)TH000005733 |2 gbd | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Klassisches Latein |0 (DE-2581)TH000005737 |2 gbd | |
| 688 | 7 | |a Spätlatein |0 (DE-2581)TH000005739 |2 gbd | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Latein |0 (DE-588)4114364-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Literatur |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Direkte Rede |0 (DE-588)4012417-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-90-04-52500-9 |
| 830 | 0 | |a The language of classical literature |v volume 37 |w (DE-604)BV047200493 |9 37 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033886251&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
| 940 | 1 | |q gbd_4_2301 | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20230620 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033886251 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 470 |e 22/bsb |f 09014 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 470 |e 22/bsb |f 09015 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184484718837761 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents List of Figures and Tables vn Acknowledgements ix i Introduction i i.i Corpus of Examined Texts շ 1.2 Data Set for the Analysis 6 շ Theoretical Preliminaries 9 2.1 Direct Discourse 11 2.1.1 Deictic Centres and Deleties 12 2.1.2 Syntactic Characteristics 13 2.1.3 Compatibility with Certain Expressions 15 2.1.4 Literalness of Quotations 16 2.1.5 Number of Speech Situations 16 2.1.6 Summary 18 2.2 Structures Similar to Direct Discourse 19 2.2.1 Pure Quotations 19 2.2.2 Mixed Quotations 21 2.2.3 Strengthening Illocutionary Force 24 2.3 Direct Discourse Markers 27 2.3.1 Verbal Markers 28 2.3.2 Non-verbal Markers 30 2.3.3 Zero Markers 32 2.3.4 Punctuation 34 2.4 Grammaticalization: How New Quotative Markers Arise 35 3 The Marking of Direct Discourse in the Examined Texts 38 3.1 Verbal Markers 39 3.1.1 Inquit 40 3.1.1.1 Frequency of Use 40 3.1.1.2 Forms 42 3.1.1.3 Addressees, Modifiers, Cataphoric Expressions 43 3.1.1.4 Position of Inquit 44 3.1.1.5 Expressions before Interposed Inquit and Reporting Clause Patterns 45 3.1.1.6 Agreement of Inquit 50 3.1.1.7 Generalized Interlocutor 51 3.1.1.8 Summary 52
VI CONTENTS Ait 53 3.1.2.1 Frequency of Use, Forms 53 3.1.2.2 Position and Adjacency 55 3.1.2.3 Patterns of Reporting Clause 56 3.1.2.4 Summary 59 3-1-3 Dicere 59 3.1.3.1 Forms 59 3.1.3.2 Frequency of Use 60 3.1.3.3 Position and Adjacency 64 3.1.3.4 Patterns of Reporting Clause 64 3.1.3.5 Dicens quia, dicens si 69 3.1.3.6 Summary 69 3-1-4 Loqui and Compounds 70 3-1-5 Other Verbal Markers 71 3.1.5.1 Respondere 75 3.1.5.2 Clamare and Compounds (-Clam-Verbs) 77 3.1.5.3 Remaining Verbal Markers 80 3.2 Non-verbal Markers 85 3.3 Zero Markers 90 3.4 Multiple Marking and Redundancy 94 3-4-1 Frequency of Use and Typical Patterns 99 3-4-2 Degrees ofRedundancy 101 3-4-3 Reasonsfor the Use ofRedundant Multiple Marking 105 3-1-2 4 Discussion 107 4.1 Overview of the Use and Characteristics of Direct Discourse Markers 107 4.2 Factors in Use and Development 112 4.2.1 Factorsfor Diachronic Trends 113 4.2.2 Subjective Factors 118 4.3 Grammaticalization 124 5 Conclusions 128 References 133 Index Locorum 144
|
| adam_txt |
Contents List of Figures and Tables vn Acknowledgements ix i Introduction i i.i Corpus of Examined Texts շ 1.2 Data Set for the Analysis 6 շ Theoretical Preliminaries 9 2.1 Direct Discourse 11 2.1.1 Deictic Centres and Deleties 12 2.1.2 Syntactic Characteristics 13 2.1.3 Compatibility with Certain Expressions 15 2.1.4 Literalness of Quotations 16 2.1.5 Number of Speech Situations 16 2.1.6 Summary 18 2.2 Structures Similar to Direct Discourse 19 2.2.1 Pure Quotations 19 2.2.2 Mixed Quotations 21 2.2.3 Strengthening Illocutionary Force 24 2.3 Direct Discourse Markers 27 2.3.1 Verbal Markers 28 2.3.2 Non-verbal Markers 30 2.3.3 Zero Markers 32 2.3.4 Punctuation 34 2.4 Grammaticalization: How New Quotative Markers Arise 35 3 The Marking of Direct Discourse in the Examined Texts 38 3.1 Verbal Markers 39 3.1.1 Inquit 40 3.1.1.1 Frequency of Use 40 3.1.1.2 Forms 42 3.1.1.3 Addressees, Modifiers, Cataphoric Expressions 43 3.1.1.4 Position of Inquit 44 3.1.1.5 Expressions before Interposed Inquit and Reporting Clause Patterns 45 3.1.1.6 Agreement of Inquit 50 3.1.1.7 Generalized Interlocutor 51 3.1.1.8 Summary 52
VI CONTENTS Ait 53 3.1.2.1 Frequency of Use, Forms 53 3.1.2.2 Position and Adjacency 55 3.1.2.3 Patterns of Reporting Clause 56 3.1.2.4 Summary 59 3-1-3 Dicere 59 3.1.3.1 Forms 59 3.1.3.2 Frequency of Use 60 3.1.3.3 Position and Adjacency 64 3.1.3.4 Patterns of Reporting Clause 64 3.1.3.5 Dicens quia, dicens si 69 3.1.3.6 Summary 69 3-1-4 Loqui and Compounds 70 3-1-5 Other Verbal Markers 71 3.1.5.1 Respondere 75 3.1.5.2 Clamare and Compounds (-Clam-Verbs) 77 3.1.5.3 Remaining Verbal Markers 80 3.2 Non-verbal Markers 85 3.3 Zero Markers 90 3.4 Multiple Marking and Redundancy 94 3-4-1 Frequency of Use and Typical Patterns 99 3-4-2 Degrees ofRedundancy 101 3-4-3 Reasonsfor the Use ofRedundant Multiple Marking 105 3-1-2 4 Discussion 107 4.1 Overview of the Use and Characteristics of Direct Discourse Markers 107 4.2 Factors in Use and Development 112 4.2.1 Factorsfor Diachronic Trends 113 4.2.2 Subjective Factors 118 4.3 Grammaticalization 124 5 Conclusions 128 References 133 Index Locorum 144 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Mikulová, Jana ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)127531161X |
| author_facet | Mikulová, Jana ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mikulová, Jana ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_variant | j m jm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048509164 |
| classification_rvk | FT 11800 FN 4537 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1355306339 (DE-599)BVBBV048509164 |
| discipline | Philologie / Byzantinistik / Neulatein |
| discipline_str_mv | Philologie / Byzantinistik / Neulatein |
| era | Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03453nam a2200613 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048509164</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221012s2022 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004524996</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-52499-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1355306339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048509164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ALT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FT 11800</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)34367:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FN 4537</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)34196:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mikulová, Jana</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)127531161X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin</subfield><subfield code="c">by Jana Mikulová</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden ; Boston</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 147 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The language of classical literature</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"If you read a work by Cicero or Seneca and then open The Pilgrimage of Egeria, Augustine, or Gregory of Tours, you will soon notice that Late Latin authors quote authorities differently. They provide a perfect example of synthesising two potentially conflicting traditions - "classical" and "biblical". This book examines how the system of direct discourse marking developed over the centuries. It focuses on selecting marking means, presents the dynamics of change and suggests factors that might have been at play. The author guides the reader on the path that goes from the Classical prevalence of inquit to the Late innovative mix of marking words including the very classical inquit, an increased use of dico, the newly recruited ait, and dicens, influenced by biblical translations. The book suggests that Late authors tried to make reading and understanding easier by putting quotative words before quotations and increasing the use of redundant combinations (e.g. "he answered saying")"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Literatur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035964-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Latein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114364-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Direkte Rede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012417-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Latin language / Discourse analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discourse markers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct discourse in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000005211</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lateinische Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000005733</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Klassisches Latein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000005737</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Spätlatein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000005739</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Latein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114364-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Literatur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035964-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Direkte Rede</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012417-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-90-04-52500-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The language of classical literature</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 37</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV047200493</subfield><subfield code="9">37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033886251&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_4_2301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033886251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">470</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">470</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09015</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048509164 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T20:47:04Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:40:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789004524996 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033886251 |
| oclc_num | 1355306339 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-384 DE-12 DE-M100 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-384 DE-12 DE-M100 |
| physical | VIII, 147 Seiten Diagramme |
| psigel | gbd_4_2301 BSB_NED_20230620 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Brill |
| record_format | marc |
| series | The language of classical literature |
| series2 | The language of classical literature |
| spelling | Mikulová, Jana ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)127531161X aut Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin by Jana Mikulová Leiden ; Boston Brill [2022] © 2022 VIII, 147 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The language of classical literature volume 37 "If you read a work by Cicero or Seneca and then open The Pilgrimage of Egeria, Augustine, or Gregory of Tours, you will soon notice that Late Latin authors quote authorities differently. They provide a perfect example of synthesising two potentially conflicting traditions - "classical" and "biblical". This book examines how the system of direct discourse marking developed over the centuries. It focuses on selecting marking means, presents the dynamics of change and suggests factors that might have been at play. The author guides the reader on the path that goes from the Classical prevalence of inquit to the Late innovative mix of marking words including the very classical inquit, an increased use of dico, the newly recruited ait, and dicens, influenced by biblical translations. The book suggests that Late authors tried to make reading and understanding easier by putting quotative words before quotations and increasing the use of redundant combinations (e.g. "he answered saying")" Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 gnd rswk-swf Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd rswk-swf Latein (DE-588)4114364-4 gnd rswk-swf Direkte Rede (DE-588)4012417-4 gnd rswk-swf Latin language / Discourse analysis Discourse markers Direct discourse in literature Rede (DE-2581)TH000005211 gbd Lateinische Sprache (DE-2581)TH000005733 gbd Klassisches Latein (DE-2581)TH000005737 gbd Spätlatein (DE-2581)TH000005739 gbd Latein (DE-588)4114364-4 s Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 s Direkte Rede (DE-588)4012417-4 s Geschichte 100 v. Chr.-600 z DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-90-04-52500-9 The language of classical literature volume 37 (DE-604)BV047200493 37 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033886251&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Mikulová, Jana ca. 20./21. Jh Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin The language of classical literature Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd Latein (DE-588)4114364-4 gnd Direkte Rede (DE-588)4012417-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4035964-5 (DE-588)4114364-4 (DE-588)4012417-4 |
| title | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |
| title_auth | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |
| title_exact_search | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |
| title_full | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin by Jana Mikulová |
| title_fullStr | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin by Jana Mikulová |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin by Jana Mikulová |
| title_short | Evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late Latin |
| title_sort | evolution of direct discourse marking from classical to late latin |
| topic | Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd Latein (DE-588)4114364-4 gnd Direkte Rede (DE-588)4012417-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Literatur Latein Direkte Rede |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033886251&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV047200493 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mikulovajana evolutionofdirectdiscoursemarkingfromclassicaltolatelatin |