Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review:
That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not asso...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in constitutional law
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 18 Aug 2022) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 333 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9781009039321 |
DOI: | 10.1017/9781009039321 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048502258 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221007s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781009039321 |c Online |9 978-1-00-903932-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009039321 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009039321 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1347220457 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048502258 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 347.41012 | |
100 | 1 | |a Allen, Jason Grant |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |0 (DE-588)1170599702 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |c Jason Grant Allen |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2022 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 333 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 18 Aug 2022) | ||
520 | |a That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves | ||
650 | 4 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-31-651066-7 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033879513 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184472113905664 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Allen, Jason Grant ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_GND | (DE-588)1170599702 |
author_facet | Allen, Jason Grant ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Allen, Jason Grant ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_variant | j g a jg jga |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048502258 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009039321 (OCoLC)1347220457 (DE-599)BVBBV048502258 |
dewey-full | 347.41012 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.41012 |
dewey-search | 347.41012 |
dewey-sort | 3347.41012 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009039321 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02539nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048502258</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221007s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009039321</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-903932-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009039321</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009039321</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1347220457</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048502258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.41012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, Jason Grant</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1170599702</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review</subfield><subfield code="c">Jason Grant Allen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xix, 333 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 18 Aug 2022)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-31-651066-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033879513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048502258 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T20:44:56Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:39:53Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781009039321 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033879513 |
oclc_num | 1347220457 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 333 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
spelling | Allen, Jason Grant ca. 20./21. Jh. (DE-588)1170599702 aut Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review Jason Grant Allen Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2022 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 333 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in constitutional law Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 18 Aug 2022) That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-31-651066-7 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Allen, Jason Grant ca. 20./21. Jh Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain |
title | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |
title_auth | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |
title_exact_search | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |
title_exact_search_txtP | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |
title_full | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review Jason Grant Allen |
title_fullStr | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review Jason Grant Allen |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review Jason Grant Allen |
title_short | Non-statutory executive powers and judicial review |
title_sort | non statutory executive powers and judicial review |
topic | Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain |
topic_facet | Judicial review of administrative acts / Great Britain |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenjasongrant nonstatutoryexecutivepowersandjudicialreview |