A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements:
This paper considers legal implications that are likely to emerge from the implementation of a TRIPS Waiver decision. Assuming that a Waiver is adopted in the form presented in the May 2021 proposal by South Africa and India et al, we review the interaction between the Waiver and other commitments t...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Geneva
South Centre
[2022]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Research paper / South Centre
144 (27 January 2022) |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper considers legal implications that are likely to emerge from the implementation of a TRIPS Waiver decision. Assuming that a Waiver is adopted in the form presented in the May 2021 proposal by South Africa and India et al, we review the interaction between the Waiver and other commitments to protect IP rights under international IP and investment treaties. Our principal research question is to analyze whether domestic measures implementing the Waiver are compatible with the implementing State's other obligations to protect IP rights established under multilateral IP treaties, IP and Investment Chapters of FTAs as well as BITs. In light of typical examples for such overlapping commitments, we first focus on (1) defences directly affecting compatibility with these treaty commitments (here referred to as 'internal' defences). In a second part, we review (2) potential defences under general international law that may serve to justify (in other words, to preclude the wrongfulness of) such measures. We conclude that often internal and/or general defences will operate to support the implementation of the Waiver despite overlapping commitments in international IP and investment law. This conclusion is reinforced by a purpose-oriented understanding of the TRIPS Waiver as authorizing measures necessary to achieve the goal of "unimpeded, timely and secure access" for all to covered medical technologies "for the prevention, treatment or containment of COVID-19" |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048415251 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220819s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1787364682 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Große Ruse- Khan, Henning |d 1974- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |c Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu |
264 | 1 | |a Geneva |b South Centre |c [2022] | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Research paper / South Centre |v 144 (27 January 2022) | |
520 | 3 | |a This paper considers legal implications that are likely to emerge from the implementation of a TRIPS Waiver decision. Assuming that a Waiver is adopted in the form presented in the May 2021 proposal by South Africa and India et al, we review the interaction between the Waiver and other commitments to protect IP rights under international IP and investment treaties. Our principal research question is to analyze whether domestic measures implementing the Waiver are compatible with the implementing State's other obligations to protect IP rights established under multilateral IP treaties, IP and Investment Chapters of FTAs as well as BITs. In light of typical examples for such overlapping commitments, we first focus on (1) defences directly affecting compatibility with these treaty commitments (here referred to as 'internal' defences). In a second part, we review (2) potential defences under general international law that may serve to justify (in other words, to preclude the wrongfulness of) such measures. We conclude that often internal and/or general defences will operate to support the implementation of the Waiver despite overlapping commitments in international IP and investment law. This conclusion is reinforced by a purpose-oriented understanding of the TRIPS Waiver as authorizing measures necessary to achieve the goal of "unimpeded, timely and secure access" for all to covered medical technologies "for the prevention, treatment or containment of COVID-19" | |
653 | 0 | |a Immaterialgüterrechte / 1.1 x | |
653 | 0 | |a Internationales Investitionsrecht / 1.2 x | |
653 | 0 | |a TRIPS. / 1.3 x | |
653 | 0 | |a Internationale Handelspolitik / 1.4 x | |
653 | 0 | |a Welt / 1.5 x | |
700 | 1 | |a Paddeu, Federica |d 1982- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/RP-144.pdf |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.southcentre.int/research-paper-144-27-january-2022 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a ebook | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033793641 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184327564558336 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Große Ruse- Khan, Henning 1974- Paddeu, Federica 1982- |
author_facet | Große Ruse- Khan, Henning 1974- Paddeu, Federica 1982- |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Große Ruse- Khan, Henning 1974- |
author_variant | r k h g rkh rkhg f p fp |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048415251 |
collection | ebook |
ctrlnum | (DE-599)KXP1787364682 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02881nmm a2200361 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048415251</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220819s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1787364682</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Große Ruse- Khan, Henning</subfield><subfield code="d">1974-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements</subfield><subfield code="c">Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geneva</subfield><subfield code="b">South Centre</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Research paper / South Centre</subfield><subfield code="v">144 (27 January 2022)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper considers legal implications that are likely to emerge from the implementation of a TRIPS Waiver decision. Assuming that a Waiver is adopted in the form presented in the May 2021 proposal by South Africa and India et al, we review the interaction between the Waiver and other commitments to protect IP rights under international IP and investment treaties. Our principal research question is to analyze whether domestic measures implementing the Waiver are compatible with the implementing State's other obligations to protect IP rights established under multilateral IP treaties, IP and Investment Chapters of FTAs as well as BITs. In light of typical examples for such overlapping commitments, we first focus on (1) defences directly affecting compatibility with these treaty commitments (here referred to as 'internal' defences). In a second part, we review (2) potential defences under general international law that may serve to justify (in other words, to preclude the wrongfulness of) such measures. We conclude that often internal and/or general defences will operate to support the implementation of the Waiver despite overlapping commitments in international IP and investment law. This conclusion is reinforced by a purpose-oriented understanding of the TRIPS Waiver as authorizing measures necessary to achieve the goal of "unimpeded, timely and secure access" for all to covered medical technologies "for the prevention, treatment or containment of COVID-19"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Immaterialgüterrechte / 1.1 x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationales Investitionsrecht / 1.2 x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TRIPS. / 1.3 x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Handelspolitik / 1.4 x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Welt / 1.5 x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paddeu, Federica</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/RP-144.pdf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.southcentre.int/research-paper-144-27-january-2022</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033793641</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048415251 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T20:26:24Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:37:35Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033793641 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-M382 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten) |
psigel | ebook |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
publisher | South Centre |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Research paper / South Centre |
spelling | Große Ruse- Khan, Henning 1974- Verfasser aut A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu Geneva South Centre [2022] 1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Research paper / South Centre 144 (27 January 2022) This paper considers legal implications that are likely to emerge from the implementation of a TRIPS Waiver decision. Assuming that a Waiver is adopted in the form presented in the May 2021 proposal by South Africa and India et al, we review the interaction between the Waiver and other commitments to protect IP rights under international IP and investment treaties. Our principal research question is to analyze whether domestic measures implementing the Waiver are compatible with the implementing State's other obligations to protect IP rights established under multilateral IP treaties, IP and Investment Chapters of FTAs as well as BITs. In light of typical examples for such overlapping commitments, we first focus on (1) defences directly affecting compatibility with these treaty commitments (here referred to as 'internal' defences). In a second part, we review (2) potential defences under general international law that may serve to justify (in other words, to preclude the wrongfulness of) such measures. We conclude that often internal and/or general defences will operate to support the implementation of the Waiver despite overlapping commitments in international IP and investment law. This conclusion is reinforced by a purpose-oriented understanding of the TRIPS Waiver as authorizing measures necessary to achieve the goal of "unimpeded, timely and secure access" for all to covered medical technologies "for the prevention, treatment or containment of COVID-19" Immaterialgüterrechte / 1.1 x Internationales Investitionsrecht / 1.2 x TRIPS. / 1.3 x Internationale Handelspolitik / 1.4 x Welt / 1.5 x Paddeu, Federica 1982- Verfasser aut https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/RP-144.pdf Verlag kostenfrei Volltext https://www.southcentre.int/research-paper-144-27-january-2022 Verlag kostenfrei |
spellingShingle | Große Ruse- Khan, Henning 1974- Paddeu, Federica 1982- A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title_auth | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title_exact_search | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title_exact_search_txtP | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title_full | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu |
title_fullStr | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu |
title_full_unstemmed | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Federica Paddeu |
title_short | A TRIPS-Covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international IP and investment agreements |
title_sort | a trips covid waiver and overlapping commitments to protect intellectual property rights under international ip and investment agreements |
url | https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/RP-144.pdf https://www.southcentre.int/research-paper-144-27-january-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT großerusekhanhenning atripscovidwaiverandoverlappingcommitmentstoprotectintellectualpropertyrightsunderinternationalipandinvestmentagreements AT paddeufederica atripscovidwaiverandoverlappingcommitmentstoprotectintellectualpropertyrightsunderinternationalipandinvestmentagreements |