Euroopa Liidu õigus: Eesti vaade
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Estonian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Tallinn
UKU
2022
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 512 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789916410240 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048317081 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20221215 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 220706s2022 xx |||| 00||| est d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789916410240 |9 978-9916-4-1024-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1355307314 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048317081 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a est | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Parind, Mart |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1120623995 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Euroopa Liidu õigus |b Eesti vaade |c Mart Parind |
| 264 | 1 | |a Tallinn |b UKU |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 512 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2004-2021 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtssystem |0 (DE-588)4139924-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gericht |0 (DE-588)4121346-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Urteil |0 (DE-588)4062174-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4020342-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Estland |0 (DE-588)4015587-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Estland |0 (DE-588)4015587-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtssystem |0 (DE-588)4139924-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Gericht |0 (DE-588)4121346-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Gerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4020342-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Urteil |0 (DE-588)4062174-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2004-2021 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20221215 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 4798 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 4798 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 4 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033696530 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820143272099577856 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
SISUKORD Eessõna. 10 Autorist. 13 Kasutatud lühendid. 14 I EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE SUHE EESTI ÕIGUSEGA. 19 1.1 Euroopa Liidu õiguse sidumine Eesti õiguskorraga.22 1.2 Euroopa Liitu kuulumise põhiseaduslik volitus ja selle piirangud. 24 1.2.1 Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted. 24 1.2.2 Liidu integratsioonitase. 30 1.3 Euroopa Liidu õiguse esimus. 36 1.3.1 Euroopa Kohtu vaade.39 1.3.2 Vaade läbi Eesti põhiseaduse prisma. .43 1.3.2.1 N or matiivne argument.47 1.3.2.1 a Ekskurss: võimalik toetus Euroopa Liidu õigusest. .48 1.3.2.2 Doktrinaalne
argument. 54 1.3.3 Esimuse põhimõtte praktiline tähendus. 56 1.3.3.1 Kooskõlaline tõlgendamine. 58 1.3.3.1 a Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise lai haare. 62 1.3.3.1 b Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise piirid. 64 1.3.3.2 Riigisisese normi kohaldamata jätmine. 68 1.3.3.2 a Ekskurss: Euroopa Liidu õiguse vahetu õigusmõju. 70 1.3.3.2 b Repriis : riigisisese normi kohaldamata j ätmine. 75 1.3.3.2 c Blokeeriv toime ja asendav toime. 82 1.3.3.3 Kooskõlaline tõlgendamine vs normi kohaldamata jätmine. 83 1.3.3.4 Lõplikuks muutunud haldusaktide uuesti läbivaatamine. 85 1.3.3.4 a Kühne Heitzi doktriin.87 1.3.3.4 b Võrdväärsuse ja tõhususe põhimõtete toime. 94 1.3.3.5 Kohtuotsuse seadusjõu põhimõttest erandite tegemine. 96 1.4 Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtete kohtulik kaitse. 102 1.4.1 Identiteedikontroll. 102 1.4.1.1 Identiteedikontrolli menetlus- ja
materiaalõiguslikke aspekte. 108 1.4.2 Ultra vires kontroll. 112 1.4.2.1 Ultra vires kontrolli menetlus- ja materiaalõiguslikke aspekte. 117 II EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE ALLIKAD. 125 2.1 Euroopa Liidu esmane õigus.128 2.1.1 Liidu aluslepingud. 128 2.1.2 Liidu põhiõiguste harta. 129 2.1.2.1 Harta kohaldamisala. 134 2.1.2.1 a Harta kohaldamine liikmesriikide suhtes. 135 6
Sisukord 2.1.2. laa Agendisituatsioon. 139 2.1.2.1 ab Körvalekaldesituatsioon.141 2.1.2.l ae Materiaalõigusliku seose situatsioon. 142 2.1.2.2 Harta vahetu õigusmõju. 145 2.1.2.3 Seos Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooniga.151 2.1.2.4 Suhe liikmesriikide põhiseadustega. 155 2.1.3 Liidu õiguse üldpõhimõtted. 165 2.1.3.1 Üldpõhimõtete vahetu õigusmõju. 170 2.2 Euroopa Liidu osalusega rahvusvahelised lepingud. 176 2.2.1 Rahvusvahelise lepingu vahetu õigusmõju. 181 2.3 Rahvusvaheline kirjutamata õigus. 186 2.4 Euroopa Liidu teisene õigus. 187 2.4.1 Määrus. 188 2.4.1.1 Määruse üldine kohaldatavus. 188 2.4.1.2 Määruse terviklik
siduvus. 189 2.4.1.3 Määruse vahetu kohaldatavus. 189 2.4.1.4 Määruse vahetu õigusmõju. 191 2.4.2 Direktiiv. 192 2.4.2.1 Direktiivi ülevõtmine. 193 2.4.2.1 a Direktiivi ülevõtmise vorm ja meetod. 195 2.4.2. laa Vorm. 196 2.4.2.l ab Meetod. 197 2.4.2.1 b Direktiivi ülevõtmise tähtaeg ja selle toime. 199 2.4.2.2 Direktiivi vahetu õigusmõju. .203 2.4.2.2a Rikkumine direktiivi ülevõtmisel. 205 2.4.2.2b Sätte tingimusetus ja piisav täpsus. 206 2.4.2.2c Direktiivile tuginemine riigi vastu. 207 2.4.2.2ca Riik ja riigi tuletis. 212 2.4.2.3 Direktiivi juhuslik õigusmõju. 215 2.4.2.3a
Kolmnurksuhted. 215 2.4.2.3b Juhuslikud horisontaalsed mõjud. 217 2.4.2.4 Direktiiviga kooskõlaline tõlgendamine.219 2.4.2.4a Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise kohustuse tekke aeg. 223 2.4.2.4b Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise laiendatud juhud. 224 2.4.3 Otsus. 226 2.4.3.1 Otsuse vahetu õigusmõju.227 2.4.4 Soovitus, arvamus ja muud pehme õiguse aktid. 230 2.4.4.1 Pehme õiguse praktiline ja õiguslik toime. 233 III EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE TÕLGENDAMINE. 239 3.1 Üldised lähtekohad Euroopa Liidu õiguse tõlgendamisel.242 3.2 Normiteksti eri keeleversioonide vastuolude ületamine. 246 7
Sisukord 3.3 Euroopa Liidu õigusmõistete autonoomne tähendus. 250 3.4 Ettevalmistavad materjalid tõlgendusargumendina. 252 3.5 Õigusakti põhjendused tõlgendusargumendina. 255 IV ÕIGUSTE JA ÕIGUSKORRA KAITSE EUROOPA LIIDU ASJADES. 259 4.1 Rikkumismenetlus liikmesriigi suhtes. 259 4.1.1 Rikkumismenetluse ajend. 260 4.1.2 Rikkumismenetluse subjekt. 261 4.1.3 Rikkumismenetluse ese. 262 4.1.4 Rikkumismenetluse algatamise otsustamine. 266 4.1.5 Eelmenetlus. 269 4.1.5.1 Ametlik kiri. 270 4.1.5.2 Põhjendatud arvamus. 271 4.1.6 Rikkumishagi esitamine. 273 4.1.7 Rikkumishagi nõue. 275
4.1.8 Rikkumishagi lahendamine.279 4.1.9 Rahaline sanktsioon.287 4.1.10 Ajutised meetmed. 293 4.1.11 Kohtuotsuse täitmise tähtaeg. 296 4.2 Liikmesriigi hagi teise liikmesriigi vastu. 298 4.3 Euroopa Kohtult eelotsuse küsimine.300 4.3.1 Eelotsust küsima õigustatud asutused.304 4.3.2 Liikmesriigi kohtu õigus eelotsust küsida. 309 4.3.2.1 Kohtu funktsioonide eristamine eelotsuse küsimisel. 313 4.3.2.2 Menetlusosaliste seisukohtade ja taotluse mõju. 313 4.3.2.3 Edasikaebus eelotsuse küsimise otsuse peale. 316 4.3.3 Liikmesriigi kohtu kohustus eelotsust küsida. 319 4.3.3.1 Kohtu rollist tulenev kohustus. 319 4.3.3.2 Õigusküsimuse sisust tulenev kohustus. 321 4.3.3.3 Erandid kohustusest eelotsust
küsida.324 4.3.3.3 a Acte éclairé doktriin.325 4.3.3.3 b Acte clair doktriin. 325 4.3.3.3 c Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni mõju. 328 4.3.4 Eelotsusetaotluse koostamine. 330 4.3.5 Eelotsusetaotluse vastuvõetavus. 333 4.3.5.1 Puhtalt riigisisesed olukorrad. 334 4.3.5.1 a Renroi-situatsioonide erand.335 4.3.5.1 b Liidu põhivabaduste võimaliku mõjutamise erand.336 4.3.5.1 c Pöörddiskrimineerimist keelava sätte erand. 339 4.3.5.2 Asjakohatud, hüpoteetilised ja kunstlikud küsimused. 340 4.3.5.3 Tühistamishagi esitamise võimaluse kasutamatajätmine. 341 8
Sisukord 4.3.S.За Kohtu omaalgatuse erand.343 4.3.6 Eelotsusetaotluse lahendamine. 347 4.3.7 Eelotsuse toime. 349 4.3.7.1 Eelotsuse ajaline mõju.353 4.4 Hagi Euroopa Liidu akti tühistamiseks. 357 4.4.1 Vaidlustatavad aktid. 357 4.4.1.1 Ühise valis- ja julgeolekupoliitika erand. 362 4.4.1.2 Vaidlustatavad aktid mitteprivilegeeritud hagejatele. 366 4.4.2 Kaebeõigusega isikud. 373 4.4.2.1 Kaebeõiguse eeltingimused. 375 4.4.3 Tühistamise alused. 377 4.4.4 Võistlev menetlus. 380 4.4.5 Tühistamishagi lahendamine. 381 4.4.6 Tühistamishagi esitamise tähtaeg. 385
4.4.7 Kohtuotsuse toime. 388 4.5 Kaebus Euroopa Ombudsmanile. 391 4.5.1 Kaebuse esitamine.394 4.5.2 Kaebuse lahendamine. 396 4.6 Euroopa Liidu õiguse rikkumisega tekitatud kahju hüvitamine.401 4.6.1 Kahjunõue Euroopa Liidu vastu. .402 4.6.1.1 Liidu vastutuse eeltingimused.404 4.6.1.1a Kahju teke ja laad.405 4.6.1.1b Liidu õiguserikkumine. .408 4.6.1.1c Rikutud normist üksikisikule õiguste tulenemine. .409 4.6.1.Id Õigusrikkumise piisav selgus.410 4.6.1.1 e Otsene põhjuslik seos. 411 4.6.1.2 Hagi esitamisega seotud küsimusi. .412 4.6.2 Kahjunõue liikmesriigi vastu. .416 4.6.2.1 Riigivastutuse
eeltingimused. .419 4.6.2.1 a Riigisiseste reeglite lubatavus ja keelatus. .421 4.6.2.2 Vastutav riigiorgan. .423 Kasutatud kohtupraktika. .430 Kasutatud kirjandus. .480 Muud materjalid. 511 9
KASUTATUD KIRJANDUS A ■ A. A. The Incidental Effect of Directives. — ELR 1999/1 ■ A.R. E.C. Law and the MIB Agreements. — JPIL 2001 /4 ■ Aarnio, A. Õiguse tõlgendamise teooria. Juura 1996 ■ Aaviksoo, В. (Konstitutsiooniline) renvoi : kas põhiseaduslik nõue või kaera Trooja hobusele? — Juridica 201S / 2 ■ Abbott, K. W, Snidai, D. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. — ІО 2003/3 ■ Academy of European Law (ed). Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Volume V, Book 2. Kluwer Law International 1997 ■ Adams, Μ., Meeusen, J. et al. (ed). Judging Europe’s Judges: the Legitimacy of Case Law of the European Court of Justice Examined. Hart Publishing 2013 ■ Aedmaa, A., Lopman, E. jt. Haldusmenetluse käsiraamat.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2004 ■ Ahi, К. Rahvuslik parlament Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse kontekstis. — Juridica 1999/6 ■ Albi, A. Euroliit ja kaasaegne suveräänsus. Üks võimalikke vastukajasid põhiseaduse ekspertiisikomisjoni üleskutsele aruteluks. — Juridica 2000/3 • Albi, A. Euroopa põhiseaduse leping: kas põhiseadus või välisleping? — Juridica 2005/1 ■ Albi, A. Põhiseaduse muutmine Euroopa Liitu astumiseks. Ekspertarvamused, teoreetiline ja võrdlevõiguslik perspektiiv ning protseduur. — Juridica 2001 /9 • Albi, A., Gallagher, Μ. jt. Ühispöördumine seoses nn Põhiseaduse Kolmanda Akti riigiõiguslike probleemidega. — Juridica 2002/5 ■ Albi, A., Bardutzky, S. (ed). National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. T.M.C. Asser Press 2019 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. Keeping Up Appearances: the Court of Justice and the Effects of
EU Directives. — CLJ 2010/3 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. Private Parties in European Community Law: Challenging Community Measures. Clarendon Press 1996 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. The Commission’s Powers in the Enforcement of Directives: a Step Forward? - ELR 2000/5 ■ Albors-Llorens, A.The Direct Effect of EU Directives: Fresh Controversy or a Storm in aTeacup? Comment on Portgas. — ELR 2014/6 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. The European Court of Justice, More than a Teleological Court. — CYELS 1999 ■ Alemanno, A. How Much Better is Better Regulation? Assessing the Impact of the Better Regulation Package. — EJRR 2015/6 ■ Alexy, R. Theorie der Grundrechte. Suhrkamp 1985 ■ Allikmets, S. Tuntud või timdmatu hea halduse põhimõte. — Juridica 2014/3 ■ Alonso García, R. The Spanish Constitution and the European Constitution: The Script for a Virtual Collision and Other Observations on the Principle of Primacy. — GLJ 2005/6 480
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Alter, К. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford University Press 2003 ■ Alter, K.The European Court’s Political Power. Selected Essays. Oxford University Press 2009 ■ Amalfitano, C., Pollicino, О. Two Courts,Two Languages? The Taricco Saga Ends on aWorrying Note. - Verfassungsblog 05.06.2018. Kättesaadav: https:// verfassungsblog.de/two-courts-two-languages-the-taricco-saga-ends-ona-worrying-note / ■ Amtenbrink, F., Repasi, R. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision in Weiss: A Contextual Analysis. — ELR 2020/6 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Activation of the Ultra Vires Review: The Slovak Pensions Judgment of the Czech Constitutional Court. — GLJ 2013/7 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Balancing Conflicting Fundamental Rights: The Sky Österreich Paradigm. — ELR 2014/5 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Solange III? Fundamental Rights Protection Under the National Identity Review. - ELR 2017/2 ■ Anagnostaras, G. The Allocation of Responsibility in State Liability Actions for Breach of Community Law: a Modern Gordian Knot? — ELR 2001 / 2 ■ Andenas, Μ., Bekkedal,T. et al. (ed).The Reach of Free Movement.T.Μ.C. Asser Press 2017 ■ Andenas, Μ., Jacobs, E (ed). European Community Law in the English Courts. Oxford University Press 1998 • Anderson, D., Demetriou, Μ. References to the European Court. 2nd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 2002 ■ Andresen, E. Riigivastutus ilma riigi vastutuseta: notari, kohtutäituri ja vandetõlgi isiklik ametivastutus Euroopa õiguse ja riigiõiguse vaatepunktis. — Juridica 2006/9 ■ Andresen, E.
Õigusvastaste tagajärgede kõrvaldamine ja kahju hüvitamine riigivastutusõiguses. — Juridica 2006/3 ■ Annus,T. Kohtud kui poliitilised institutsioonid. — Juridica 2007/9 ■ Anton, S. Eesti kultuuri ja rahvuse mõistes põhiseadus preambulis. — Riigiõiguse aastaraamat 2020 ■ Arcari, Μ. The Creeping Constitutionalization and Fragmentation of International Law: From „Constitutional” to „Consistent” Interpretation. — PYIL 2013 ■ Arden, Μ. Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe. —YEL 2010 ■ Arena, A. From an Unpaid Electricity Bill to the Primacy of EU Law: Gian Galeazzo Stendardi and the Making of Costa v. ENEL. — EJIL 2019/3 ■ Arnull, A. EU Recommendations and Judicial Review. — ECLR 2018/3 ■ Arnull, A. Tasting the Difference. — ELR 1987/6 ■ Arnull, A. The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford University Press 2000 ■ Arnull, A. The European Court and Judicial Objectivity: a Reply to Professor Hartley. — LQR ■ Arnull, A. The Legal Status of Recommendations. — ELR 1990/4 ■ Arnull, A., Barnard, C. et al. (ed). A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour 1996/112 481
Kasutatud kirjandus of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing 2011 ■ Armili, A., Chalmers, D. (ed). The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Arrowsmith, S. A Note on Case C262/92: Commission v Italy. — PPLR 1994/3 ■ Astresses, P.-V. The Return of the Huron, or Naive Thoughts on the Handling of Article 267 TFEU by Constitutional Courts when Referring to the Court of Justice. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Azoulai, L. (ed).The Question of Competence in the European Union. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Atthoff, K., Wallgren, Μ. Clarifying Gold-Plating — Better Implementation of EU Legislation. Board of Swedish Industry and Commerce for Better Regulation / Swedish Better Regulation Council 2012 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Constitutional Pluralism and Authoritarianism. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Revitalisation of EU Constitutionalism. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law — (Why) Does it Matter? — ELJ 2011/6 ■ Avbelj, Μ., Komárek, J (ed). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Hart Publishing 2012 В ■ Baldwin, R. Rules and Government. Clarendon Press 1997 ■ Balthasar, S. Locus Standi Rules for Challenges to Regulatory Acts by Private Applicants: The New Art.263(4) TFEU. — ELR 2010/4 ■ Banks, K., von Rintelen, G. Infringement Procedures and the Juncker Commission. — ELR 2020/5 ■ Barav, A. Failure of Member States to Fulfil Their Obligations Under Community Law. — CMLR 1975/3 ■ Barav, A. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Princeton University Press 2005 ' Barav, A. The Judicial Power of the European Economic Community. — SCLR 1980/2 ■ Barczentewicz,
Μ. Judicial Duty Not to Apply EU Law. — LQR 2017/133 ■ Barents, R. The Precedence of EU Law from the Perspective of Constitutional Pluralism. — ECLR 2009/3 ■ Barnard (ed), C. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Oxford University Press 2007 ■ Bast, J. Don’t Act Beyond Your Powers: The Perils and Pitfalls of the German Constitutional Court’s Ultra Vires Review. — GLJ 2014/2 ■ Bast, J., Orgad, L. Constitutional Identity in the Age of Global Migration. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Baxter, R. R. International Law in „Her Infinite Variety“. — ICLQ 1980/4 ■ Beatson, J.,Tridimas,T. (ed). New Directions in European Public Law. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Bebr, G. The Existence of a Genuine Dispute: an Indispensable Precondition for the Jurisdiction of the Court Under Article 177 EEC Treaty? — CMLR 1980/2 ■ Beck, G. The Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: a Conflict Between Right and Right in Which 482
Kasutatud kirjandus There is No Praetor. — ELR 2005/1 ■ Becker, F. Application of Community Law by Member States’ Public Authorities: Between Autonomy and Effectiveness. — CMLR 2007/4 ■ Bengoetxea, J. The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: Towards a European Jurisprudence. Clarendon Press 1993 ■ Bergkamp, L. Private Party Standing and EU Risk Regulation. Expanded Standing Rights in the Public Interest. — EJRR 2016/3 ■ Bergstrom, C. F. Defending Restricted Standing for Individuals to Bring Direct Actions Against „Legislatíve“ Measures. — ECLR 2014/3 ■ Bernitz, U., Nergelius, J (ed). General Principles of European Community Law. Kluwer Law International 2000 ■ Besselink, L. National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon. — ULR 2010/3 ■ Besselink, L.The Parameters of Constitutional Conflict after Melloni. — ELR 2014/4 • Besselink, L., Bonelli, Μ. Back and Forth Between Sovereignty and Constitutionalism: the Court of Justice’s Constitutional Case Law. — ECLR 2018/4 ■ Betlem, G. Case C-28/95: Leur-Bloem v. Inspecteur der Belastingdienst/ Ondernemingen Amsterdam 2, [1997] ECR 1-4161 ,· Case C-130/95: Giloy v. Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am MainOst, [1997] ECR 1-4291. ֊CMLR 1999/1 ■ Betlem, G. The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation — Managing Legal Uncertainty. ֊ OJLS 2002/3 ■ Betlem, G., Nollkaemper, A. Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation. — EJIL 2003/3 ■ Beukers, T., Reestman, H.-R. On Courts of Last Resort and Lenders of Last
Resort. — ECLR 2015/2 ■ Biernat, S. How Far Is It from Warsaw to Luxembourg and Karlsruhe : The Impact of the PSPP Judgment on Poland. ֊ GLJ 2020/5 ■ Biondi, A., Eeckhout, P. et al. (ed). EU Law After Lisbon. Oxford University Press 2012 ■ Bjorge, E.The Evolutionary Interpretation ofTreaties. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Blumann, C., Dubois, L. Droit institutionnel de l’Union européenne, 2e édition. Paris 2005 • Bobek, Μ. Landtová, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court: Implications for the Preliminary Rulings Procedure. — ECLR 2014/1 ■ Bobek, Μ. On the Application of European Law in (Not Only) the Courts of the New Member States: „Don’t Do as I Say”? SSRN 2008 Kättesaadav: https: / /papers.ssrn.com/so!3/papers.cfm?abstract_id—1157841 ■ Bogojevic, S. Judicial Protection of Individual Applicants Revisited: Access to Justice through the Prism of Judicial Subsidiarity. —YEL 2015 ■ Bonelli, Μ. European Commission v Hungary (Transparency of associations) (C-78/18): The „NGOs case“: On How to Use the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Infringement Actions. -ELR 2021/2 ■ Bonnie, A. Commission Discretion Under Article 171(2) E.C. —ELR 1998/6 ■ Bonnor, P. G. The European Ombudsman: a novel source of soft law in the European Union. — 483
Kasutatud kirjandus ELR 2000/1 ■ Borchardt, K.-D. Liidu õiguse ABC. EL Väljaannete Talitus 2017 ■ Bourgeois, J. Effects of International Agreements in European Community Law: Are the Dice Cast? - MichLR 1984/5-6 ■ Boyle, A. E. Some Reflections on the Relationship ofTreaties and Soft Law. — ICLQ 1999/4 ■ Boyron, S. General Principles of Law and National Courts: Applying a Jus Commune? — ELR 1998/2 ■ Bradford, A. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press 2020 ■ Bredimas, A. Methods of Interpretation and Community Law. North-Holland Publishing 1978 ■ Bridge, J. American Analogues in the Law of the European Community. — AALR 1982/2 ■ Brittain, S. Justifying the Teleological Methodology of the European Court Of Justice: a Rebuttal. — Irish Jurist 2016/55 ■ Brkan, Μ. The Concept of Essence of Fundamental Rights in the EU Legal Order: Peeling the Onion to its Core. — ECLR 2018/2 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References as a Right — But for Whom? The Extent to Which Preliminary Reference Decisions Can be Subject to Appeal. — ELR 2011/2 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Right to a Fair Trial Under Article 6 ECHR. — ELR 2016/4 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Brown, L. N., Jacobs, F. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Sweet Maxwell 1989 • Brown, L. N., Kennedy, T. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Sweet Maxwell 1994 ■ Brummer, C. Soft Law and the Global
Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press 2011 ■ Bungenberg, Μ. The Multilateral Investment Court — Royal Road or Dead End for the EU Legal Order? -IBLJ 2019/5 ■ Burchardt, D. Intertwinement of Legal Spaces in the Transnational Legal Sphere. — LJIL 2017/2 " Burchardt, D. The Relationship Between the Law of the European Union and the Law of Its Member States — a Norm-based Conceptual Framework. — ECLR 2019/1 ■ Burley, A.-Μ., MattlijW. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. — IO 1993/1 • ' Butler, G. Independence of Non-judicial Bodies and Orders for a Preliminary Reference to the Court of Justice. — ELR 2020/6 ■ Butler, G., Šadl, U. The Preliminaries of a Reference. — ELR 2018/1 484
Kasutatud kirjandus C ■ Calliess, C., van der Schyff, G. (ed). Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press 2020 ■ Cameron, I. (ed). EU Sanctions: Law and Policy Issues Concerning Restrictive Measures. Intersentia 2013 ■ Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. et al. (ed). International Law as Law of the EuropeanUnion. Martinus Nijhoff2011 ■ Caro de Sousa, P. Catch Me IfYou Can?The Market Freedoms’ Ever-expanding Outer Limits. — EJLS2O11/2 ' Cartabia, Μ. Europe and Rights:Taking Dialogue Seriously. — ECLR 2009/1 ■ Chalmers, D. National Sovereignty and European Union Law. — ECLR 2021/3 ■ Chamon, Μ. Provisional Application of Treaties: The EU’s Contribution to the Development of International Law. — EJIL 2020/3 ■ Chinkin, C. Μ. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law. — ICLQ 1989/4 ■ Choudhury, B. Balancing Soft and Hard Law for Business and Human Rights. — ICLQ 2018/4 ■ Cini, Μ. The Soft Law Approach: Commission Rule-making in the EU’s State Aid Regime. — JEPP 2001/2 ■ Claes, Μ. Luxembourg, Here We Come? Constitutional Courts and the Preliminary Reference Procedure. — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Claes, Μ.The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution. Hart Publishing 2006 ■ Claes, Μ., Reestman, J.-H.The Protection of National Constitutional Identity and the Limits of European Integration at the Occasion of the Gauweiler Case — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Coman-Kund, F., Amtenbrink, F. On the Scope and Limits of the Application of National Law by the European Central Bank within the Single Supervisory Mechanism. — BFLR
2018/2 ■ Comba, M. E., Richetto, S. Implementation of Public Procurement Directives in Italy: After Three Years, Still a LongWay to be Completed. — PPLR 2019/5 ■ Conway, G. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge University Press 2012 ■ Cortright, D., Lopez, G. A. (ed). Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft. Rowman Littlefield 2002 “ Cosma, H. A., Whish, R. Soft Law in the Field of EU Competition Policy. — EBLR 2003/1 ■ Cragl, P. (Judicial) Love is not a One-Way Street: The EU Preliminary Reference Procedure as a Model for ECtHR Advisory Opinions Under Draft Protocol No. 16. — ELR 2013/2 ■ Craig, P. Directives: Direct Effect, Indirect Effect and the Construction of National Legislation. -ELR 1997/6 ■ Craig, P. EU Administrative Law. 1st edition. Oxford University Press 2006 ■ Craig, P. Once More unto the Breach: The Community, the State and Damages Liability. — LQR 1997/113 • Craig, P.The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis. — CMLR 2011/2 ■ Craig, P.The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions. — ELR 2005/3 485
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Craig, P. The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, andTreaty Reform. Oxford University Press 2010 “ Craig, P., de Burea, G. EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Craig, P., de Burca, G. The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford University Press 2003 • Craig, P., Markakis, Μ. Gauweiler and the Legality of Outright Monetary Transactions. — ELR 2016/1 ■ Cramér, P. Does the Codification of the Principle of Supremacy Matter? — CYELS 2004 ■ Cremona, Μ., de Witte, B. EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals. Hart Publishing 2008 ■ Cross, E. D. Pre-emption of Member State Law in the European Economic Community: A Framework for Analysis - CMLR 1992/3 D ■ Dashwood, A.The Relationship Between the Member States and the European Union/European Community. — CMLR 2004/2 ■ Dashwood, A., Hillion, C (ed). The General Law of E.C. External Relations. Sweet Maxwell 2000 ■ Dashwood, A., Maresceau, Μ. (ed). Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape. Cambridge University Press 2008 ■ Dashwood, A., White, R. Enforcement actions under Articles 169 and 170 EEC. — ELR 1989/6 ■ Dawson, Μ. Fundamental Rights in European Union Policy-making: The Effects and Advantages of Institutional Diversity. — HRLR 2020/1 ■ Dawson, Μ. Soft Law and the Rule of Law in the European Union: Revision or Redundancy? — EUIWP 2009/24 ■ De la Rochere, J. D. Challenges for the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU at theTime of the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty. — FILJ 2010/6 ■ De Mars, S.The Limits of General
Principles: A Procurement Case Study. — ELR 2013/3 ■ De Mol, Μ. Dominguez: A Deafening Silence. — ECLR 2012/2 ■ De Mol, Μ. Kücükdeveci: Mangold Revisited — Horizontal Direct Effect of a General Principle of EU Law. - ECLR 2010/2 ■ Delmas-Marty, Μ., Fronza, E. et al. (ed). Les sources du droit international penal. Société de législation compare 2005 ■ Dehousse, R. Law as Politics. — EUP 2002/1 ■ Dehousse, R. The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration. Palgrave Macmillan 1998 ■ Dermine, P. The End of Impunity? The Legal Duties of „Borrowed“ EU Institutions Under the European Stability Mechanism Framework. — ELR 2017/2 ■ De Vries, H. P. Civil Law and the Anglo-American Lawyer: A Case-illustrated Introduction to Civil Law Institutions and Method. Dobbs Ferry 1976 ■ Diez-Hochleitner, J. Le traité de Maastricht et l’inexécution des arrêts de la Cour de Justice par 486
Kasutatud kirjandus les Etats members. — RMUE 1994/2 ■ Di Salvatore, E. L’identità costituzionale dell’Unione Europea e degli stati membri. Il decentramento politico-istituzionale nel processo di integrazione. Giappichelli 2008 ■ Dobbs, Μ. Sovereignty, Artide 4(2) TEU and the Respect of National Identities: Swinging the Balance of Power in Favour of the Member States? — YEL 2014 ■ Donegan, T. ESMA Sounds a Death-knell for Cross-border Exchange Access, in Conflict with UK Legislation and the MiFIR. — JIBLR 2018/6 ■ Dougan, Μ. Judicial Review of Member State Action under the General Principles and the Charter: Defining the „Scope of Union Law“. — CMLR 201S/S ■ Dougan, Μ. National Remedies Before the Court of Justice: Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation. Hart Publishing 2004 ■ Dougan, Μ. The „Disguised“ Vertical Direct Effect of Directives? — CLJ 2000/ 3 ■ Dougan, Μ. The Francovich Right to Reparation: Reshaping the Contours of Community Remedial Competence. — EPL 2000/1 ■ Douglas-Scott, S. Constitutional Law of the European Union. Longman Pearson 2002 ■ Douglas-Scott, S.The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. — HRLR 2011/4 ■ Drake, S. Twenty Years After Von Colson: the Impact of „Indirect Effect“ on the Protection of the Individual’s Community Rights. — ELR 2005/3 ■ Drinóczi, T. Constitutional Identity in Europe: the Identity of the Constitution. A Regional Approach. — GLJ 2020/2 ■ Dūmon, F. The Case-Law of the Court of Justice — A Critical Examination of the Methods of Interpretation. Europa Institut Luxembourg 1976 ' Dunoff, J. L.,Trachtman,
J. P. (ed). Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge University Press 2009 ■ Dyevre, A. Domestic Judicial Defiance in the European Union: A Systemic Threat to the Authority of EU Law? — YEL 2016 ■ Dyrberg, P. Horizontal Direct Effect v. Duty of Construction in the EEA?The Norwegian View. -ELR 2001/2 E ■ Eckes, C. Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order? — ELJ 2012/2 ■ Eeckhout, P. EU External Relations Law. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press 2011 ■ Eeckhout, P., Lopez-Escudero, Μ. (ed). The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis. Hart Publishing 2016 ■ Eerola, R., Mylly,T. jt. Euroopa Liidu õiguse alused.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2001 ■ El Boudouhi, S. The National Judge as an Ordinary Judge of International Law? Invocability of Treaty Law in National Courts. — LJIL 2015/2 ■ Eliantonio, Μ., Stefan, O. Soft Law Before the European Courts: Discovering a „Common 487
Kasutatud kirjandus Pattern“?-YEL 2018 ■ Eller, К. Demokraatia ja finantsstabiilsus. Õiguskantsleri taotlus Euroopa stabiilsusmehhanismi asutamislepingu artikli 4 lõike 4 põhiseadusele vastavuse kontrollimiseks. — Juridica 2012/5 ■ Ellis, J. General Principles and Comparative Law. — EJIL 2011/4 ■ Enchelmaier, S. Always at Your Service (Within Limits): the ECJ’s Case Law on Article 56TFEU (2006-11).-ELR 2011/5 ■ Eriksen, E. O., Fossum, J. E. (ed). Democracy in the European Union. Integration Through Deliberation? Routledge 2000 ■ Eriksson, A. European Court of Justice: Broadening the Scope of European Nondiscrimination Law. — IJCL 2009/4 ■ Erne, J. Euroopa Kohtu eelotsused. Nende taotlemine ja mõju siseriiklikule õiguskorrale. — Juridica 2000/5 ■ Erne, J. Üksikisiku õiguste kaitse Euroopa Ühenduse institutsiooni akti või tegevusetuse vaidlustamise kaudu. — Juridica 2005/10 ■ Erne, J. Üksikisiku õiguste kaitse juhul, kui riik rikub Euroopa Ühenduse õigust. — Juridica 2005/5 ■ Emits, Μ. Konkreetne normikontroll de lege latają de legejerenda. — Juridica 2001/8 ■ Emits, Μ. Millestki ürgsest ja kargest ning autoriteediröövist. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted. — RiTo 2011/24 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiõiguste mõiste ja tähtsus õigussüsteemis. — Juridica 1996/9 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiõigused, demokraatia, õigusriik.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2011 ■ Emits, Μ. Tõlgendamisest Riigikohtu praktikas. — Juridica 2010/9 ■ Emits, Μ. Võimalikud põhiseaduse muudatused seoses Euroopa Liiduga ja riigi otsustusõiguse ülekandmisega. — Juridica 2019/1 ■ Emits, Μ. Õiguskantsler. — Juridica
2003/1 • Emits, Μ., Laurand, A. jt. ESM asutamisleping: rahvusvaheline leping ja malpropre Euroopa Liidu õigus. — Juridica 2012/5 ■ Emits, Μ, Laurand, A. Kolmanda akti tõusja langus. — Juridica 2017/1 ■ Eskridge Jr, W. N. Dynamie Statutory Interpretation. — UPLR 1987/6 F ■ Fabbrini, F. After the OMT Case: the Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States. — GLJ 2015/4 ■ Fabbrini, F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Faraguna, P. Constitutional Identity in the EU — A Shield or a Sword? — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Fastenrach, U. Relative Normativity in International Law. — EJIL 1993/4 ■ Feichtner, I. The German Constitutional Court’s PSPP Judgment: Impediment and Impetus for the Democratization of Europe. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Fennelly, N. Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice. — FILJ 1996/ 3 488
Kasutatud kirjandus Fernandez Esteban, M. L. The Rule of Law in the European Constitution. Kluwer Law International 1999 Ferran, E., Alexander, K. Can Soft Law Bodies be Effective? The Special Case of the European Systemic Risk Board. — ELR 2010/6 ■ Fontanelli, F. Implementation of EU Law through Domestic Measures after Fransson: the Court of Justice BuysTime and ,,Non֊preclusion”Troubles Loom Large. ֊ ELR 2014/5 ■ Fontanelli, F. The Invocation of the Exception of Non-Performance: A Case-Study on the Role and Application of General Principles of International Law of Contractual Origin. - CJICL 2012/1 ■ Forsythe, Μ. ATypology of Relationships between State and Non-State Justice Systems. ֊֊ JLPUL 2007/56 ■ Frantziou, E.The Binding Charter Ten Years on: More than a „Mere Entreaty“? —YEL 2019 ■ Frantziou, E. (Most of) the Charter of Fundamental Rights is Horizontally Applicable. — ECLR 2019/2 ■ Frese, M. J. The Development of General Principles for EU Competition Law Enforcement — The Protection of Legal Professional Privilege. — ECLR 2011/4 ■ Fromont, Μ. Le principe de sécurité juridique. — AJDA 1996/édition spéciale G ■ Garbagnati Ketvel, Μ.-G. The Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Respect of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. — ICLQ 2006/1 ■ Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. EU International Agreements Through a US Lens: Different Methods of Interpretation,Tests and the Issue of „Rights”. — ELR 2014/S ■ Gáspár Szilágyi, S .The „Primacy“ and „Direct Effect“ of EU International Agreements. SSRN 2020. Kättesaadav:
https://papers.ssrn.com/so!3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3S27683 ' Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E. et al. (ed). European Union Treaties: A Commentary. C. H. Beck, Hart 2015 • Georgieva, Z. Soft Law in EU Competition Law and its Judicial Reception in Member States: A Theoretical Perspective. — GLJ 201S/2 ■ Gerard, D., Lenaerts, K.The Structure of the Union According to the Constitution for Europe: the Emperor is Getting Dressed. — ELR 2004/ 3 ' Gerard, P., Verrijdt, W. Belgian Constitutional Court Adopts National Identity Discourse. — ECLR 2017/1 ■ Ghazaryan, N. Who Are the „Gatekeepers“?: In Continuation of the Debate on the Direct Applicability and the Direct Effect of EU International Agreements. —YEL 2018 ■ Ginter, C. Riigi vastutus õigusemõistmisel tekitatud kahju eest. — Juridica 2004/8 ■ Ginter, C., Narits, R. ESM asutamislepingu põhiseaduslikkus kui demokraatliku protsessi defitsiidi küsimus. — Juridica 2012/5 • Ginter, C., Schasmin, P. Euroopa Liidu direktiivide mõistmine ja mõju. — Juridica 2021/2 • Glashausser, A. Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpetation. — VLR 2005 /1 489
Kasutatud kirjandus ' Gold, J. Interpretation: The IMF and International Law. Kluwer Law International 1996 • Gormley, L. Judicial Review — Reflections on the New Dawn after the First Judgments of the General Court. ֊ ERT 2012/2 • Grabenwarter, C., Huber, P. Μ. et al. The Role of the Constitutional Courts in the European Judicial Network. — EPL 2021/1 ■ Greaves, R. The Nature and Binding Effect of Decisions Under Article 189 EC. — ELR 1996/1 ■ Grief, N. Direct Effect of Directives and Organs of the State. — ELR 1991/2 ■ Grimbergen, R. How Boundaries Have Shifted. On Jurisdiction and Admissibility in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure. — REAL 2015/2 ■ Grimm, D. A LongTime Coming. — GLJ 2020/5 " Groussot, X. Creation, Development and Impact of the General Principles of Community Law: Towards a jus commune europaeum? Intellecta docusys 2005 ' Groussot, X., Minssen, T. Res Judicata in the Court of Justice Case-Law: Balancing Legal Certainty with Legality. — ECLR 2007/3 ■ Groussot, X., Olsson, I. Clarifying or Diluting the Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights? —The Judgments in Åkerberg and Melloni. — LSELR 2013/Aut. " Guastaferro, B. Beyond the Exceptionalism of Constitutional Conflicts:The Ordinary Functions of the Identity Clause. —YEL 2012 H ■ Hadjiyianni, I.The European Union as a Global Regulatory Power. — OJLS 2021/1 " Halmai, G. National(ist) Constitutional Identity?: Hungary’s Road to Abuse Constitutional Pluralism. SSRN 2017. Kättesaadav: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2962969 ■ Harlow, C., Rawlings, R. Accountability and Law
Enforcement: the Centralised EU Infringement Procedure. — ELR 2006/4 ■ Harlow, C., Rawlings, R. Pressure Through Law. Routledge 1992 ■ Hartley, T. C. Constitutional Problems of the European Union. Hart Publishing 1999 ■ Hartley,T. C. Federalism, Courts and Legal Systems:The Emerging Constitution of the European Community. — AJCL 1986/2 ■ Hartley, T. C.The Constitutional Foundations of the European Union. — LQR 2001/117 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 1988 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 5th Edition. Oxford University Press 2003 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press 2007 ‘ Hedemann-Robinson, Μ. Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law. Legal Issues and Challenges. 2nd Edition. Routledge 2015 ■ Herzog, R., Gerken, L. Stop the European Court of Justice. EUobserver 10.09.2008. https:// 490
Kasutatud kirjandus euobserver.com/ opinion/ 26714 ■ Heukels, T., McDonnell, A. (ed). The Action for Damages in Community Law. Kluwer Law International 1997 ■ Hilson, C., Antony Downes, T. Making Sense of Rights: Community Rights in E.C. Law. — ELR 1999/2 ■ Hinsley, F. H. Sovereignty. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press 1986 ■ Hirv, L. Kas juriidilise isiku kriminaalvastutus on rahvusvahelise tavaõiguse norm? — Juridica 2018/6 ' Hodson, D., Maher, I. Soft Law and Sanctions: Economic Policy Co-ordination and Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact. ֊֊ JEPP 2004/5 ■ Hoevenaars, J., Krommendijk, J. Black Box in Luxembourg: The Bewildering Experience of National Judges and Lawyers in the Context of the Preliminary Reference Procedure. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Hofmann, A. Resistance Against the Court of Justice of the European Union. — ELR 2018/2 ■ Hofmann, H. Negotiated and Non-negotiated Administrative Rule-making: The Example of EC Competition Policy. — CMLR 2006/1 ■ Hofmann, H.,Türk, A. H. (ed). EU Administrative Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing 2006 • Hofstötter, В. Non-Compliance of National Courts: Remedies in European Community Law and Beyond.T.M.C. Asser Press 2005 ■ Holdgaard, R. External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses. Kluwer Law International 2008 I ■ Iglesias Sanchez, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? — ECLR 2018/1 ■ Itzcovich, G. The Interpretation of Community Law by the European Court of Justice. — GLJ 2009/5 J ■ Jaago, K.-S. Ülevõtmisperioodil
riigihangete direktiivide mõju riigisisesele õiguskorrale. — Juridica 2015/3 ■ Jackson, J. H. Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept. — AJIL 2003/4 ■ Jacobs, F. Human Rights in the European Union:The Role of the Court of Justice. — ELR 2001/4 ■ Jacobs, F. The Evolution of the European Legal Order. — CMLR 2004/ 2 ■ Jacobsohn, G. J. Constitutional Identity. Harvard University Press 2010 ■ Jacobsson, K. Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy. — JESP 2004/4 ■ Jaeger, T (Hrsg). Europa 4.0? Die EU im Angesicht politischer und technologischer Herausforderungen. Jan Sramek Verlag 2018 491
Kasutatud kirjandus • Jaklič, К. Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Jancic, D (ed). National Parliaments After the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? Oxford University Press 2017 ■ Jans, J., de Lange, R. et al. Europeanisation of Public Law. Europa Law Publishing 2007 ■ Jans, J., Marseille, B. Competence Remains Competence? Reopening Decisions That Violate Community Law. — REAL 2007/1 ■ Jans, J.,Vedder, H. European Environmental Law. 3rd Edition. Europa Law Publishing 2008 ■ Jiangyuan, F. Breitsamer und Ulrich GmbH Co KG v Landeshaupstadt München: Be Careful with Small Portions of „Pre-Packed Food“. - EJRR 2017/1 ■ Justiitsministeerium. Põhiseaduseasjatundjatekogu tegevuse aruanne. 2018. Kättesaadav.-https:// www.just. ee / sites ì www.just. ee / files / pohiseaduse_asjatundjate_kogu_tegevusaruanne_2018. pdf ■ Jõks, A. Põhiseadus muutuste künnisel. — Postimees 16.04.2002 ■ Jäärats, K. Kõike ühe ja üks kõigi eest kakskümmend aastat hiljem. — RiTo 2020/41 ■ Järvamägi, R. Põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalve kohtu mõju seadusandjale. — Juridica 2006/6 ■ Jürgen, I. Materiaalõiguse ebaõige kohaldamine kui kohtuotsuse kohtuotsuse kassatsiooni korras tühistamise alus kriminaalmenetluses. — Juridica 2004/1 К ■ Kaczorowska, A. The Power of a National Competition Authority to Disapply National Law Incompatible with EC Law — and its Practical Consequences. — ECompLR 2004/9 ■ Kalamees, P. Tarbija õiguste kaitse maksekäsu kiirmenetluses Euroopa Kohtu praktika valguses. — Juridica 2019/8 ■ Kaieda, S. L. Extension of the Preliminary
Rulings Procedure Outside the Scope of Community Law: „The Dzodzi Line of Cases“. — EIoP 2000/11 ■ Kalmo, H. Euroopa Liidu õiguse ootamatud mõjud. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Kalmo, H. Kes peaks kaitsma Eesti põhiseadust? — Juridica 2010/5 ■ Kaimo, H. Mis on järel põhiseadusest? Veel kord Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse ülimuslikkusest. — Juridica 2008/9 ■ Kalmo, H. Põhiseaduse põkkumine Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartaga. — Juridica 2016/3 ■ Kalmo, K., Luts-Sootak, Μ. (toim). Iganenud või igavene? Tekste kaasaegsest suveräänsusest. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2010 ■ Kapteyn, P., VerLoren vanThemaat, P. Introduction to the Law of the European Communities After the Coming Into Force of the Single European Act. 2nd Edition. Springer Netherlands 1989 ■ Karatzia, A., Konstadinides,T.The Legal Nature and Character of Memoranda of Understanding as Instruments Used by the European Central Bank. — ELR 2019/4 ■ Kelemen, D. R. Suing for Europe: Adversarial Legalism and European Governance. — CPS 2006/1 ■ Kelemen, D. R., Pech, L. The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the 492
Kasutatud kirjandus Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland. — CYELS 2019 ■ Kellerbauer, Μ., Klamert, Μ. et al. (ed). The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Oxford University Press 2019. ■ Kelly, E. „Curiouser and curiouser“. Direct Effect and Fundamental Rights: The Decision of the European Court of Justice in Werner Mangold v Rudiger Helm. — CSLR 2006/1 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa Inimõiguste Konventsiooni tõlgendamisest. — Juridica 1994/4 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa Liitja õigus. Oiguskirjastus 2000 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa ühenduse õiguse ülimuslikkuse doktriin — arengud ja vastuolud. — Juridica 1998/4 ■ Kerikmäe, T. Rahvusvaheline tavaõigus. — Juridica 1998/1 • Kerikmäe,T., Nyman-Metcalf, K. Karlsruhe vs. Lissabon: kas põhiseadusliku dialoogi avamäng? -Juridica 2009/9 ■ Kilbey, I.The Interpretation of Article 260TFEU (ex 228 EC). — ELR 2010/3 ■ Kilpatrick, C., NovitZjT. et al. (ed).The Future of Remedies in Europe. Hart Publishing 2000, ■ Kiviorg, Μ., Land, K. jt. Rahvusvaheline õigus. 4. trükk. Juura 2010 ■ Klabbers, J. Informal Instruments Before the European Court of Justice. — CMLR 1994/5 ■ Klabbers, J. International Law in Community Law: The Law and Politics of Direct Effect. —YEL 2001 ■ Klabbers, J. The Redundancy of Soft Law. — NJIL 1996/2 ■ Klages, R. ECJ Reverses its Case Law on Procedural Effects of a Detailed Opinion. — EU Focus 2001/80 ■ Klamert, Μ. Dark Matter: Competence, Jurisdiction and „The Area Largely Covered by EU Law“ - Comment on Lesoochranarske. — ELR 2012/3 ■ Klamert, Μ. Judicial Implementation of
Directives and Anticipatory Indirect Effect: Connecting the Dots. - CMLR 2006/S " Kochenov, D. On Policing Article 2 TEU Compliance — Reverse Solange and Systemic Infringements Analyzed. — PYIL 2013 ■ Kochenov, D. (ed). EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights. Cambridge University Press 2017 ■ Kokott, J., Sobotta, C. Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union: On the Relationship between EU Fundamental Rights, the European Convention and National Standards of Protection. —YEL 2015 • Kolk, T. Tõhus ja õiglane menetlus õigusakti põhiseadusvastasuse nõude lahendamisel. — Juridica 2012/10 ■ Komárek, J. Inter-Court Constitutional Dialogue After the Enlargement — Implications of the Case of Professor Köbler. — CYELP 2005 ■ Komárek, J. Playing with Matches:The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgement of the Court of Justice of the EU ultra vires. — ECLR 2012/2 ■ Komárek, J. The Place of Constitutional Courts in the EU. — ECLR 2013/3 • Koolmeister, I. Poliitika ja õigus. — Juridica 2020/3 ■ Korkea-aho, E. EU Soft Law in Domestic Legal Systems: Flexibility and Diversity Guaranteed? 493
Kasutatud kirjandus - MJECL 2009/3 ■ Korkea-aho, E. National Courts and European Soft Law: Is Grimaldi Still Good Law? —YEL 2018 ■ Korkea-aho, E. Watering Down the Court of Justice? The Dynamics between Network Implementation and Article 2S8TFEU Litigation. — ELJ 2013/5 ■ Koskenniemi, Μ. (ed). International Law Aspects of European Union. Martinus Nijhoff 1997 ■ Koutrakos, P. EU International Relations Law. Hart Publishing 2006 ■ Koutrakos, P. Judicial Review in the EU’s Cmmon Foreign and Security Policy. — ICLQ 2018/1 ■ Kovács, К. The Rise of an Ethnocultural Constitutional Identity in the Jurisprudence of the East Central European Courts. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Král, R. On the Choice of Methods ofTransposition of EU Directives. — ELR 2016/2 • Král, R., Mádr, P. On the (In)applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to National Measures Exceeding the Requirements of Minimum Harmonisation Directives. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Krisch, N. Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralist Structure of Postnationalist Law. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Krommendijk, J. „Open Sesame!“: Improving Access to the ECJ by Requiring National Courts to Reason Their Refusals to Refer. — ELR 2017/1 ■ Krommendijk, J. Wide Open and Unguarded Stand our Gates: The CJEU and References for a Preliminary Ruling in Purely Internal Situations. — GLJ 2017/6 ■ Kull, I. Võlaõiguse arengud kohtupraktikas. — Juridica 1999/6 ■ Kumm, Μ. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe Before and After the Constitutional Treaty. — ELJ 2005/3 • Kumm, Μ. Who is the Final Arbiter of
Constitutionality in Europe? Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. ֊ CMLR 1999/2 ■ Kumm, Μ., Ferreres Comella, V.The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union. — IJCL 2005/2-3 L ■ Lacchi, C. Review by Constitutional Courts of the Obligation of National Courts of Last Instance to Refer a Preliminary Question to the Court of Justice of the EU. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Lackhoff, К., Nyssens, H. Direct Effect of Directives in Triangular Situations. — ELR 1998/5 ■ Laffranque, J. Eesti põhiseaduse ja Euroopa õiguse kooselu. — Juridica 2003/3 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liidu Nobeli auhind. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liidu õigussüsteem ja Eesti õiguse koht selles. Juura 2006 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liit ja Euroopa Ühendus. Institutsioonid ja õigus. Sisekaitseakadeemia kirjastus 1999 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa põhiseaduse lepingu peied Tallinnas. Mis saab edasi? — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Laffranque, J. Kas ühinev Euroopa vajab ühtset konstitutsiooni? — Juridica 2000/7 ■ Laffranque, J. Lojaalsuse põhimõte Euroopa Liidus ja selle mõju Eestile. — Juridica 2001 /9 ■ Laffranque, J. Pilk Eesti õigusmaastikule põhiseaduse täiendamise seaduse valguses. Euroopa 494
Kasutatud kirjandus Liidu õigusega seotud võtmeküsimused põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalves. — Juridica 2007/8 ■ Laffranque, J. Põhiseadus läbi inimõigustealase Euroopa kohtupraktika prisma. — Juridica 2021/1 ■ Laffranque, J. Sõltumatu ja demokraatlik õigusriik Riigikohtu praktikas. Eesti Euroopa Liidu liikmesuse kontekstis. — Juridica 2009/8 ■ Laffranque, J. Who Has the Last Word on the Protection of Human Rights in Europe? — Juridica International 2012/19 ■ Laffranque, J., Madise, IL jt. Põhiseaduse täiendamise seaduse eelnõust. — Juridica 2002/8 ■ Laffranque, R. EL/EU lepingute konstitutsionaliseerimise protsess ja liikmesriikide suveräänsus. Dilemma Prantsuse õiguse vaatepunktist nähtuna. — Juridica 2000/8 ' Lagoutte, S., Gammeltoft-Hansen,T. et al. (ed).Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights. Oxford University Press 2016 ■ Láncos, P. L. The Power of Soft Law: Spontaneous Approximation of Fining Policies for Anti competitive Conduct. Part 1. — ECompLR 2019/11 ■ Land, K. Euroopa ühendused — supranatsionaalne organisatsioon. — Juridica 1997/9 ■ Lang, Μ. Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ. — Intertax 2007/4 ■ Lasok, D., Bridge, J. W. Law and Institutions of the European Communities. Sth Edition. Lexis Law Pub 1991 ■ Lasser, Μ. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press 2004 ' Laulhé Shaelou, S., Karatzia, A. Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Cyprus Bail-in Litigation: a Commentary on Mallis and Ledra. — ELR 2018/2 • Laurand, A. Bosphoruse doktriin ja Euroopa Liidu liitumine Euroopa
inimõiguste konventsiooniga. — Juridica 2012/4 • Laurand, A. Euroopa Liidu liitumine inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitse konventsiooniga. — Juridica 2013/9 ■ Lavranos, N. The ECJ’s Judgments in Melloni and Åkerberg Fransson: Une ménage à trois difficulté. — ELRep 2014/4 ■ Le Sueur, A., Sunkin, Μ. et al. Public Law:Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press 2013 ■ Leenen, A. Gemeenschapsrecht en volkenrecht: Een studie naar de draagwijdte van de eigen rechtsorde van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Kluwer 1984 ■ Lefevre, S. The Interpretation of Community Law by the Court of Justice in Areas of National Competence. — ELR 2004/4 ■ Lehis, L. Maksuõiguse üldpõhimõtted. — Juridica 1999/5 ■ Lenaerts, К. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Protection of Fundamental Rights. - PYIL 2011 ■ Lenaerts, K.The European Court of Justice and Process-Oriented Review. —YEL 2012 ■ Lenaerts, K.The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union. - CMLR 2007/6 ■ Lenaerts, K. Upholding the Rule of Law Through Judicial Dialogue. —YEL 2019 ■ Lenaerts, K., Corthaut,T. Of Birds and Hedges:The Role of Primacy in Invoking Norms of EU Law. - ELR 2006/3 495
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Lenaerts, K., Desomer, Μ. Bricks for a Constitutional Treaty of the European Union: Values, Objectives and Means. — ELR 2002/4 ■ Lenaerts, K., Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. The Constitutional Allocation of Powers and General Principles of EU Law. — CMLR 2010/6 ■ Lenaerts, K., Gutman, K. „Federal Common Law” in the European Union: A Comparative Perspective from the United States. — AJCL 2006/1 ■ Lenaerts, K., Maselis, I. et al. EU Procedural Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press 2014 • Lenaerts, K.,Van Nuffel, P. Constitutional Law of the European Union. 2nd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 200S ■ Lenaerts, K.,Van Nuffel, P. European Union Law. 3rd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 2011 ■ Lenz, Μ.,Tynes, D. et al. Horizontal What? Back to Basics. — ELR 2000/5 ■ Leppik, Μ. Esimesi märke põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulikust järelevalvest: Riigikohtu praktika 1920. aasta põhiseaduse kehtimisajal. — Juridica 2012/3 “ Lüsberg, J. В. Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? — CMLR 2001/5 ■ Lindeboom, J. Is the Primacy of EU Law Based on the Equality of the Member States? A Comment on the CJEU’s Press Release Following the PSPP Judgment. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Lindma, T. Lepingute suhtes kohaldatava seaduse küsimusi Euroopa Liidus ja Eestis. — Juridica 1996/6 ■ Linntam, Μ. Pädevuse jaotus Euroopa Liidu ja liikmesriikide vahel: kas paindlik jäikus või jäik paindlikkus? — Juridica 2005/1 ■ Linntam, Μ. Õigluse idee kui argument Eesti Vabariigi Riigikohtus ja Euroopa Kohtus. — Juridica 2002/1 • Lloyd, D. The Idea of Law. Penguin Books 1964 ■ Lock,T. EU Accession
to the ECHR: Implications for the Judicial Review in Strasbourg. — ELR 2010/6 ■ Lonardo, L. Republic of Slovenia v Republic of Croatia (C-457/18): „Am I My Brother’s Keeper?“ International Agreements by Member States and the Limits of the European Court of Justice’s Jurisdiction. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Looijestijn-Clearie, A. Breaking Up is Hard To Do: Dutch Unbundling Legislation and the Free Movement of Capital. — EBOLR 2014/3 ■ Lott, A. Euroopa Liidu arengusuunad ja Eesti põhiseadus. — Juridica 2013/1 ■ Lott, A. Süvendatud majandus- ja rahandusliidu rajamine: mõju põhiõiguste kaitsele ning põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtetele. — Juridica 2013/8 ■ Luts, Μ. Õigusnormide tõlgendamise meetoditest ja teooriatest. — Juridica 1998/3 ■ Lõhmus, U. Euroopa Liidu õigussüsteem ja põhiseaduslikkuse kontroll pärast 1. maid 2004. — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Lõhmus, U. Kuidas liikmesriigi kohtusüsteem tagab Euroopa Liidu õiguse tõhusa toime? — Juridica 2007/3 ■ Lõhmus, U. Mida teha põhiseadusega? — Juridica 2005 /2 ■ Lõhmus, U. Ne bis in idem põhimõte Euroopa Liidu õiguses. — Juridica 2009/9 ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiseaduse muutmine ja muutused põhiseaduses. — Juridica 2011/1 496
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiõigused ja Euroopa Liidu õiguse üldpõhimõtted: funktsioonid, kohaldamisala ja mõju. — Juridica 2011/9 ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiõiguste kaitse kolmnurgas riik — Euroopa Nõukogu — Euroopa Liit. — Juridica 2010/S ■ Lõhmus, U. Rahvusvahelise õiguse üldtunnustatud põhimõtted Eesti õigussüsteemi osana. — Juridica 1999/9 ■ Lübbe-Wolff, G. Who Has the Last Word? National and Transnational Courts — Condict and Cooperation. - YEL 2011 Μ ■ Maasikas, Μ. Ankur või kompass. Euroopa Liit kriisiolukorras. — RiTo 2020/41 ■ MacCormick, N. Beyond the Sovereign State. — MLR 1993/1 • MacCormick (ed), N. Constructing Legal Systems: „European Union“ in Legal Theory. Springer 1997 ■ Maciejewski, T., Theilen, J. T. Temporal Aspects of the Interaction Between National Law and EU law: Reintroducing the Protection of Legitimate Expectations. — ELR 2017/2 ■ Madise, L. Rahvusvahelise õiguse käsitlusest 1992. aasta Eesti põhiseaduses. — Juridica 1998/7 ■ Madise, íl. Õigusalaste kirjatööde selgusest ja kergusest. — Juridica 2019/6 ■ Madise, U. jt (toim). Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Neljas, parandatud ja täiendatud väljaanne. Juura 2017 • Madise, U., Kalmo, H. et al. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Viies, parandatud ja täiendatud väljänne. Juura 2020. ■ Magliveras, K. Best intentions but empty words: the European Ombudsman. — ELR 199S/4 ■ Mailend, A. Direktiivide vahetu õigusmõju: Euroopa kohtupraktika ebaselge éclairé. — Juridica 1995/2 ■ Maimann, К. Integratsiooniõiguse põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulik järelevalve Eestis. — Juridica
2006/6 ■ Malcolm, H. What is a Preliminary Reference? And Why Should I Care? — ArchR 2015/9 ■ Maltby, N. Marleasing : What Is All the Fuss About? — LQR 1993/109 ■ Mancini, G. F. (ed). Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union. Collected Essays. Hart Publishing 2000 • Mancini, G. F., Keeling, D.T. Democracy and the European Court of Justice. — MLR 1994/2 • Marguery, T. The Protection of Fundamental Rights in European Criminal Law after Lisbon: What Role for the Charter of Fundamental Rights? — ELR 2012/4 • Markakis, Μ. Accountability in the Economic and Monetary Union: Foundations, Policy, and Governance. Oxford University Press 2020 ■ Markesinis, B. S. (ed).The Clifford Chance Lectures. Volume 1: Bridging the Channel. Oxford University Press 1996 ■ Marsden, S. Invoking Direct Application and Effect of International Treaties by the European Court of Justice: Implications for International Environmental Law in the European Union. — 497
Kasutatud kirjandus ICLQ 201 ï /3 ■ Martens, S. Methodenlehre des Unionsrechts. Mohr Siebeck 2013 ■ Martin, S. (ed). The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël. Springer Science+Business Media 1994 ■ Martin Rodriguez, P. Crónica De Una Muerte Anunciada: Comentario A La Sentencia Del Tribunal De Justicia (Gran Sala), de 26 de Febrero de 2013, Stefano Melloni, C-399/11. — RGDE 2013/30 ■ Martines, F. Direct Effect of International Agreements of the European Union. — EJIL 2014/1 ■ Martinico, G. Is the European Convention Going to Be „Supreme”? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts. — EJIL 2012/2 ■ Martinico, G. The „Polemical“ Spirit of European Constitutional Law: On the Importance of Conflicts in EU Law. — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Maruste, R. Eesti omariikluse põhidokumendid. Eelkonstitutsioonilised aktid ja põhiseadused koos lühikommentaaridega. Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia riigiõiguse sihtkapital 2020 ■ Maruste, R. Ettekanne Põhiseaduse viienda aastapäeva konverentsil. — Juridica 1997/9 ■ Maruste, R. Konstitutsionalism ning põhiõiguste ja -vabaduste kaitse. Juura 2014 ■ Maruste, R. Mis oli, on ja võiks olla põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulikus järelevalves. — Juridica 2020/6 ■ Maruste, R. Põhiseaduse tõlgendamise meetodid. — Juridica 1996/2 ■ Maruste, R. Põhiseadust tuleks siiski muuta. — Postimees 29.01.2002 ' Maruste, R. Rahvusvahelise kohtu otsuse siseriiklikust täitmisest. — Juridica 2003/9 ■ Maruste, R, Albi, A. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus Euroopa Liidu õiguskorras. — Juridica 2003 /1 ■ Mason, P. Is European Law „Always Speaking“? —VAT
Digest 2011/84 ■ Mastroianni, R. On the Distinction BetweenVertical and Horizontal Direct Effects of Community Directives: What Role for the Principle of Equality? — EPL 1999/3 ■ Mataija, Μ. Internal Situations in Community Law: An Uncertain Safeguard of Competences Within the Internal Market. — CYELP 2009 ■ Mayer, F. C. Rebels Without a Cause? A Critical Analysis of the German Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference. - GLJ 2014/2 ■ Mayer, F. C. Supremacy — Lost? — Comment on Roman Kwiecień. — GLJ 2005/11 ■ Mayer, F. C.The Ultra Vires Ruling: Deconstructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP Decision of 5 May 2020. ֊ ECLR 2020/4 ■ Mayer, F. C.To Boldly Go Where No Court Has Gone Before.The German Federal Constitutional Court’s ultra vires Decision of May 5, 2020. — GLJ 2020/5 • McLeod, I. Literal and Purposive Techniques of Legislative Interpretation: Some European Community and English Common Law Perspectives. — BJIL 2004/3 ■ Mendelson, Μ. The Formation of Customary International Law. Martinus Nijhoff 1999 ■ Mendez, Μ. The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques. — EJIL 2010/1 ■ Merusk, K. Administratsiooni diskretsioon. — Juridica 1998/3 * Merusk, K. Menetlusosaliste õigused haldusmenetluse seaduses. — Juridica 2001/8 ■ Miasik, D., Szwarc, Μ. Effectiveness of EU Directives in National Courts — Judicial Dialogue 498
Kasutatud kirjandus Continues: The Court of Justice’s Judgment in C-54S/17 Pawlak. — PYIL 2019 ■ Micklitz, H.-W., de Witte, B. (ed). The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States. Intersentia 2012 ■ Mikli, S. Kui kauge Euroopa Liidu õigus saab järsku igapäevatöö osaks: probleeme Euroopa Liidu õiguse ülevõtmisel ja rakendamisel õiguskindluse põhimõtte kontekstis. — Juridica 201S / 2 ■ Millet, F.-X. L’Union européenne et l’identité constitutionnelle des États members. LGDJ 2013 • Millett, T. Rules of Interpretation of EEC Legislation. SLR 1989/3 ■ Mitsilegas, V. Judicial Concepts of Trust in Europe’s Multi-Level Security Governance: From Melloni to Schrems via Opinion 2 /13. — Eucrim 201S / 3 ■ Moore, S., Lewis, C. Duties, Directives and Damages in European Community law. — Public Law 1993/Spring ■ Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th Edition. Alfred A. Knopf 1971 ■ Mugur, Μ., Ginter, C. Euroopa liidu õiguse põhimõtetest tulenevad piirangud seadusandja valikuvabadusele. — Juridica 2010/4 ■ Murphy, C. C. Using the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Against Private Parties after Association De Médiation Sociale. — EHRLR 2014/2 ■ Mälksoo, L. Kuidas muuta põhiseadust? — Postimees 13.0S.2002 ■ Möllers, C., Schneider, L. Demokratiesicherung in der Europäischen Union. Mohr Siebeck 2018 N ■ Narits, R. Eesti põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted omariikluse garantiina. — Juridica 2011/1 ■ Narits, R. Kohtupretsedendist. — Juridica 1995/9 ■ Narits, R.Tõlgendamine: teadus või seadus? — Juridica 1994/9 ■ Narits, R. Õiguse entsüklopeedia.
Juura 2007 ■ Nebbia, P. Do the Rules on State Aids Have a Life ofTheir Own? National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness in the Lucchini Case. — ELR 2008/3 ■ Neergaard, U., Jacqueson, C. (ed). Proceedings: Speeches from the XXVI FIDE Congress.The XXVI FIDE Congress in Copenhagen 2014. Congress publication. DJ0F Publishing 2014 ■ Neergaard, U., Nielsen, R. et al. (ed). European Legal Method: Paradoxes and Revitalisation. DJ0F Publishing 2011 ■ Neergaard, U., Sørensen, К. E. Activist Infighting Among Courts and Breakdown of Mutual Trust? The Danish Supreme Court, the CJEU, and the Ajos Case. —YEL 2017 ■ Negishi, Y. The Pro Hornine Principle’s Role in Regulating the Relationship between Conventionality Control and Constitutionality Control. — EJIL 2017/2 • Newman, A., Bach, D. The European Union as Hardening Agent: Soft Law and the Diffusion of Global Financial Regulation. — JEPP 2014/3 ■ Nicol, D. Disapplying With Relish?The Industrial Tribunals and Acts of Parliament. — Public Law 1996/4 ■ Nicolaidis, K., Howse, R. (ed).The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford University Press 2001 499
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Nollkaemper, A. The Duality of Direct Effect of International Law. EJ1L 2 015 /1 • Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Macmillan 1994 • Nyikos, S. A. Strategic Interaction Among Courts Within the Preliminary Reference Process — Stage 1 : National Court Preemptive Opinions. — EJPR 2006/4 ■ Nyman-Metcalf, K. Mõningad vaatekohad Euroopa õiguse ja põhiseaduse vahekorrale. Kas Euroopa Liit on riik? — Juridica 2010/S О ■ О ’ Keeffe, D. Is the Spirit ofArticle 177 Under Attack? Preliminary References and Admissibility. -ELR 1998/6 ■ O’Keefe, D., Bavasso, A. (ed). Judicial Review in European Union Law. Volume I. Kluwer Law International 2000 ■ Olmos Giupponi, B. International Law and Sources of Law in MERCOSUR: An Analysis of a 20-Year Relationship. — LJIL 2012/3 ■ Olsson, LA. Four Competing Approaches to International Soft Law. — SSL 2013/58 ■ Onagoruwa, G. A. Legitimacy Deficit of Soft Law Institutions in Cross-Border Bank Regulation: an African Perspective. — JIBLR 2014/4 ■ Oras, Μ. Euroopa Ühenduse keskkonnadirektiivide vahetu kohaldatavus. — Juridica 2009/6 ■ Orgad, L.The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation. — IJCL 2010/4 ■ Ost, E, van de Kerchove, Μ. De la pyramide au réseau. Pour mie théorie dialectique du droit. F.U.S.L. 2002 ■ O’Higgins,T. F., Curtin, D. et al. (ed). Constitutional Adjudication in European Community and National Law: Essays for the Hon. Mr. JusticeT.F. O’Higgins. Butterworth 1992 ■ O’Leary, S. Courts, Charters and Conventions: Making Sense of Fundamental Rights in the EU. — Irish Jurist 2016/56 ■
O’Sullivan, C. E. Ireland’s Non-Compliance with the Principle of Supremacy and the Definition of „Court or Tribunal“ for the Purposes of Article 267TFEU: A Review of the Recent Case Law. - Irish Jurist 2019/61 P ■ Pabsch, E. Euroopa Integratsioon.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 1999 ■ Palu, G. Euroopa Liidu ülimuslikkuse tagajärjel tekkinud pöörddiskrimineerimine siseriiklikus õiguskorras. Magistritöö, Tartu Ülikool 2020 ■ Papadopoulos, T. Criticising the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality. -EHRLR 2011/4 " Parind, Μ., Simovart, Μ. A. Vestlusring „Riigihankeõigus eile, täna ja homme. Müüdid ja tegelikkus“. — Juridica 2019/6 ■ Parrest, N. Hea halduse põhimõte Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartas. — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Paul, T. Teispool vaikust. Mõned hommikused meditatsioonid. Johannes Esto Ühing 2012 soo
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Peep,V. (toim). Põhiseadus ja Põhiseaduse Assamblee. Koguteos. Juura 1997 ■ Peers, S. Supremacy, Equality and Human Rights: Comment on Kücükdeveci (C-55S/O7). — ELR 2010/6 ■ Peers, S. Towards a New Form of EU Law? The Use of EU Institutions Outside the EU Legal Framework. — ECLR 2013/1 ■ Peers, S., Costa, Μ. The Old Dog Learns New Tricks: Reinvigorating Infringement Proceedings to Enhance the Effectiveness of EU Law. — ELR 2021/2 ■ Peers, S., Hervey, T. et al. (ed). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Bloomsbury Publishing 2014 • Pekkanen, R. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni tõlgendamise põhimõtted. — Juridica 2000/ 3 Perju,V. Against Bidimensional Supremacy in EU Constitutionalism. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ ■ Pernice, I. Integrating the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Constitution of the European Union: Practical and Theoretical Propositions. — CJEL 2003/5 ■ Pernice, I. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. — ECLR 2015/3 ■ Pernice, I. Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union. — ELR 2002/5 • Pernice, I. The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of the European Union. 2002 Kättesaadav:https://ec.europa.eu/dorie/fileDownload.do;jsessionid=lZpXVhSJYQSlXlXJlYFpCgBYT6cy7Xs3T6SGx0x MT322xKYSHbg8!1782169932?docId=8616 cardId=8616 ■ Perocevic, K. European Union Legal Nature: EU as sui generis — a Platybus-like Society. — InterEULawEast 2017/2 ■ Pertek, J. New Needs for Education and Training on European Law. ֊ ELR 1993/5 ■ Pescatore, P. Le recours, dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des
Communautés européennes, à des normes déduites de la comparaison des droits des Etats membres. — RIDC 1980/2 ■ Pescatore, P. The Doctrine of „Direct Effect“: An Infant Disease of Community Law. — ELR 2015/2 ■ Petersen, N. Karlsruhe’s Lochner Moment? A Rational Choice Perspective on the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Relationship to the CJEU After the PSPP Decision. — GLJ 2020/5 ' Piip, A. (autor), Pärna, P. (koost). Õiguse jõud. Ilmamaa 2007 • Pikamäe, P. Eesti võimalustest jääda ellu Euroopa Liidus. - Juridica 1995/8 • Pikamäe, P. Euroopa Ühenduste õiguskorrast. — Juridica 1996/5 ■ Pilving, I. Haldusakti tühistamine halduse poolt. — Juridica 1998/8 ■ Pilving, I. Halduse vastutuse kahju tekitamise eest. — Juridica 1998/6 ■ Pilving, L, Lapimaa, V. Annual meeting of administrative judges, Bealieu-sur-mer, March 10-11, 2006 Estonian report. Kättesaadav: https: / /www.aeaj .org/page/Annual-meeting-of-administrative-judges-Bealieusur-mer-March-10- 11 -2006-Estonian-report ■ Piris, J.-C.The Future of Europe: Towards aTwo-Speed EU? Cambridge University Press 2012 ■ Pisuke, H. Tõlkimine ja intellektuaalne omand: mõned seosed ja suundumused. — Juridica 2020/5 ■ Pizarroso Ceruti, A. The European Court of Justice: Legal Interpretation and the Dynamics of 501
Kasutatud kirjandus European Integration. — CJEL 2019/Spring ■ PK. Brexit and International Treaty-making. — ELR 2016/1 ■ PK. Is There More to Say About the Direct Effect of Directives? — ELR 2018/5 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Adjudicating Economics II: The Quantitative Easing Programme DeclaredValid. — ELR 2020/1 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Fundamental Rights and the New Battle over Legal and Judicial Supremacy: Lessons from Melloni. —YEL 2015 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Who is the Ultimate Arbiter? The Battle Over Judicial Supremacy in European Union Law. — ELR 2011/1 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ. Interpreting European Law — Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism. — EJLS 2007/1 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ. We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ., Azoulai, L. (ed).The Past and Future of EU Law.The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Hart Publishing 2010 ■ Poli, S., Cisotta, R. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Exercise of Ultra Vires Review and the Possibility to Open an Infringement Action for the Commission. — CLJ 2020/5 ■ Pollicino, О. Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint. — GLJ 2004/3 ■ Pollicino, О. The New Relationship Between National and the European Courts After the Enlargement of Europe: Towards a Unitary Theory of Jurisprudential Supranational Law? —YEL 2010 ■ Polzin, Μ. Constitutional Identity as a Constructed Reality and a
Restless Soul. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Pormeister, K. Uus isikuandmete kaitse seadus ja isikuandmed teaduses: kolm näidet probleemsest õigusloomest. — Juridica 2019/4 ■ Pozzo, P, Jacometti, V. (ed). Multilingualism and the Harmonisation of European Law. Kluwer Law International 2006 ■ Power, V. National Sovereignty is Alive and Well in the European Union: the Wightman Ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union. — Irish Jurist 2019/61 ■ Prêchai, S. Competence Creep and General Principles of Law. — REAL 2010/1 ■ Prechai, S. Directives in EC Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Prêchai, S. Directives in European Community Law: A Study of Directives andTheir Enforcement in National Courts. Oxford University Press 1995 ■ Prêchai, S. Does Direct Effect Still Matter? — CMLR 2000/5 ■ Preuss, U. K. Migration — A Challenge to Modern Citizenship. — Constellations 1998/3 ■ Prinssen, J. Μ., Schrauwen, A. (ed). Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine. Europa Law Publishing 2002 ■ Põder, J.-C. Põhiseaduse preambul ja selle väärkasutus, ERR arvamusportaal 07.06.2020 ■ Pärnamägi, I., Inkinen, A. jt. Euroopa stabiilsusmehhanismi asutamislepingu artikli 4 lõike 4 kooskõla Eesti põhiseadusega. — Juridica 2012/5 502
Kasutatud kirjandus Q Quigley, C. EC Directives and Private Law Rights. — ICCLR 1997/11 ■ R ■ Ragolle, F. Access to Justice for Private Applicants in the Community Legal Order: Recent (R) evolutions. — ELR 2003/1 ' Raidla, J. Põhiseadus ja Eesti rahvuslikud huvid vs. Euroopa föderalism. — Juridica 2013/8 • Raig, I. Eesti tee Euroopa Liitu. Unistus paremast Euroopast. International University Audentes 2008 ■ Raitio, J. The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003 ■ Randma, P. Euroopa Ühenduse kriminaalõiguslikud põhimõtted. — Juridica 2000/5 Rask, M. Ühinemise otsustab rahvas. — Postimees 29.04.2002 Rasmussen, Μ. Revolutionizing European law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment. IJCL 2014/1 ■ Raud, К. Euroopa ühenduste kohtu otsuste kirjutamise vormist ja stiilist. — Juridica 1999/4 ■ Rawlings, R., Leyland, p. et ai. (ed). Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European and International Perspectives. Oxford University Press 2013 ■ Reestman, J.-H., Besselink, L. After Åkerberg Fransson and Melloni. — ECLR 2013/2 ■ Reich, N. A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Reviewed by Norbert Reich. — ELR 2012/4 ■ Reif, L. (ed).The International Ombudsman Anthology. Kluwer Law International 1999 ■ Reinsalu, U. Kas vajame uut põhiseadust? — Juridica 2005/3 ■ Reyns, C. Saving Judicial Independence: A Threat to the Preliminary Ruling Mechanism? — ECLR 2021/1 ■ Rinze, J. The Role of the European Court of Justice as a Federal Constitutional Court. — Public Law 1993/3 ■ Ritter, C. Purely Internal Situations, Reverse
Discrimination, Guimont, Dzodzi and Article 234. SSRN 2006. Kättesaadav: https://ssrn.com/abstract=954242 ■ Robin-Oliver, S. The Evolution of Direct Effect in the EU: Stocktaking, Problems, Projections. -IJCL 2014/1 “ Rodriguez, P. Μ. The Principle of Legal Certainty and the Limits to the Applicability of EU Law. -CDE 2016/1 ■ Rodriguez-Izquierdo Serrano, Μ. The Spanish Constitutional Court and Fundamental Rights Adjudication After the First Preliminary Reference. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Rosas, A., Armati, L. EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction. Hart Publishing 2010 ■ Rosenfeld, Μ. (ed). Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference and Legitimacy. Theoretical Perspectives. Duke University Press 1994 ■ Rosenfeld, Μ., Sajó, A. (ed).The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press 2012 ■ Rosenne, S. Developments in the Law ofTreaties 1945—1986. Cambridge University Press 1989 503
Kasutatud kirjandus * Ross, Μ. Beyond Francovich. — MLR 1993/1 ■ Ross, Μ. Effectiveness in the European Lega! Order(s): Beyond Supremacy to Constitutional Proportionality? — ELR 2006/4 • Rossi, L. S. „Same Legal Value as the Treaties”? Rank, Primacy, and Direct Effects of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. — GLJ 2017/4 ■ Ruse-Kahn, H.The Role of Atypical Acts in EU External Trade and Intellectual Property Policy. — EJIL 2010/4 s ■ Saaremäel-Stoilov, K. Mõtteid Riigikohtu põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalve praktika võimalikest arengusuundadest. Sõnavõtt Eesti põhiseadusliku identiteedi kaitseks. — Juridica 2009/8 • Sabel, C. E, Zeitlin, J. (ed). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Sadi, U., Mair, S. Mutual Disempowerment: Case C-441 /14 Dansk Industri, Acting on Behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen and Case No. IS/2014 Dansk Industri (DI) Acting for Ajos A/S vThe Estate Left by A. — ECLR 2017/2 ■ Sadurski, W. European Constitutsional Identity? — Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 06/37 ■ Sáiz Arnaiz, A., Alcoberro Liivinä, C. (ed). National Constitutional Identity and European Integration. Intersentia 2013 ■ Sarapuu, Μ. Kontroll võimu teostavate ametnike üle. — Juridica 1997/4 • Sarapuu, Μ. Ombudsmani arengust kaasaegseks institutsiooniks. — Juridica 1997/6 • Sarmiento, D. Who’s Afraid of the Charter?The Court of Justice, National Courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe. — CMLR 2013/5 • Sauter, W. Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act? — CYELS 2013 ■
Schachter, O. International Law in Theory and Practice. Springer 1991 ■ Schasmin, P., Ginter, C. Euroopa Liidu õigusest tulenevad võimalused jõustunud kohtuotsuste ja haldusaktide uueks läbivaatamiseks. —Juridica 2015/3 ■ Scheingold, S. A. The Rule of Law in European Integration: the Path of the Schuman Plan. Yale University Press 1965 ■ Scheppele, K. L., Pech, P. What is Rule of Law Backsliding? — Verfassungsblog 02.03.2018 Kättesaadav: https://verfassungsblog.de/what֊is-rule-of-law-backsliding/ ■ Schiek, D. The ECJ Decision in Mangold: A Further Twist on Effects of Directives and Constitutional Relevance of Community Equality Legislation. — ILJ 2006/3 ■ Schoch, F. Haldusõiguse euroopastumine. — Juridica 2017/1 ■ Schorkopf, F. Value Constitutionalism in the European Union. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Schroeder, W. (ed). Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe: From a Common Concept to Mechanisms of Implementation. Hart Publishing 2016 ' Schwensfeier, R.TheTWD Principle Post-Lisbon. — ELR 2012/2 ■ Schutz, H.-J., Bruha,T. et al. Casebook Europarecht. C. H. Beck 2004 ■ Schütze, R. European Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press 2012 504
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Scott, H., Barber, N. State Liability under Francovich for Decisions of National Courts. — LQR 2004/120 ■ Scott, J. In Legal Limbo: Post-Legislative Guidance as a Challenge for European Administrative Law. - CMLR 2011/2 ■ Sein, S., Mikiver, Μ. jt. Pilguheit andmekaitsesubjekti õiguskaitsevahenditele uues isikuandmete kaitse üldmääruses. — Juridica 2018/2 • Selvik, G., Clifton, M.-J. et al. (ed). The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Springer 2019 • Senden, L. Soft Law and Its Implications for Institutional Balance in the EC. — ULR 2OOS/2 " Senden, L. Soft Law in European Community Law. Hart Publishing 2004 • Senden, L. Soft Post-Legislative Rulemaking: ATime for More Stringent Control. — ELJ 2012/1 ■ Senden, L., van der Brink, A. Check and Balances of Soft EU Rule-Making. European Parliament 2012 • Shapiro, Μ.The European Court of Justice: Of Institutions and Democracy. —ILR 1998/1 “ Shaw, Μ. N. International Law. 6th Edition. Cambridge Universtity Press 2008 ■ Shelton, D. Normative Hierarchy in International Law. — AJIL 2017/2 ■ Shelton, D. (ed). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford University Press 2000 • Sillaots, Μ. Kohtuniku vabadusest seadusenormi mõtte avamisel. — Juridica 1998/1 ■ Sillaots, Μ. Riigikohtu lahend Eesti kriminaalmenetlusõiguse allikana. — Juridica 2001 / 2 • Simon, D. La Directive Européenne. Dalloz 1997 ■ Simon, S., Rathke, Η. „Simply Not Comprehensible .”Why? — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Simovart, Μ. A., Härginen, К. Implementation of EU Public
Procurement Law in Estonia — History Revisited. — PPLR 2019/5 ■ Simovart, Μ. A., Parind, Μ. (koost). Riigihangete seadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Juura 2019 ■ Sirg, K. Otsese Õigusmõju doktriin. Selle kohaldamine keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi sätetele. — Juridica 2001/9 ■ Slaughter, A.-Μ., Stone Sweet,A. et al. (ed).The European Court and National Courts. Doctrine Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Slynn, G. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. — ICLQ 1984/2 ■ Smith, Μ. Enforcement, Monitoring, Verification, Outsourcing: the Decline and Decline of the Infringement Process. — ELR 2008/ 6 ■ Smits, R. A National Measure Annulled by the European Court of Justice, or: High-level Judicial Protection for Independent Central Bankers. — ECLR 2020/1 ■ Snyder, F. The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques. — MLR 1993/1 ■ Sobotta, C. Transparenz in den Rechtssetzungsverfahren der Europäischen Union. Nomos 2001 ■ Société française pour le droit International. L’élaboration du droit international public: Colloque du Toulouse. Padone 1975 • Somsen, H., Seventer, H. et al. (ed). Yearbook of European Environmental Law. Oxford 505
Kasutatud kirjandus University Press 2002 ■ Sowery, K. The Nature and Scope of the Primary Law-making Powers of the European Union: the Member States as the “Masters of the Treaties?” — ELR 2018/2 ■ Spaventa, E. Opening Pandora’s Box: Some Reflections on the Constitutional Effects of the Decision in Pupino. — ECLR 2007/1 ■ Spieker, L. D. Breathing Life into the Union’s Common Values: On the Judicial Application of Article 2TEU in the EUValue Crisis. — GLJ 2019/8 ■ Squintani, L, Lindeboom, J. The Normative Impact of Invoking Directives: Casting Light on Direct Effect and the Elusive Distinction Between Obligations and Mere Adverse Repercussions. -YEL 2019 ■ Stamatoudi, L, Torremans, P. (ed). EU Copyright Law. A Commentary. Elgar Commentaries 2014 ■ Stefan, O. Hybridity Before the Court: A Hard Look at Soft Law in the EU Competition and State Aid Case Law. — ELR 2012/1 ■ Steiner, J. From Direct Effects to Francovich: Shifting Means of Enforcement of Community Law.-ELR 1993/1 ■ Steunenberg, В., Voermans, W. The Transposition of EC Directives: a Comparative Study of Instruments, Techniques and Processes in Six Member States. Wolf Legal Publishers 2006 • Stone, C. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Object. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Strumia, E, Kaushal, A. Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Imr /¿ration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada. — GLJ 2017/7 Š ■ Sipilov, V. Euroopa Liidu direktiivide vahetu kohaldatavus. — Juridica 2010/6 Z ■ Ziller, J. National Constitutional Concepts in the New Constitution for Europe:
Part 1. — ECLR 2005/2 • Ziółkowski, Μ., Grabowska-Moroz, B. Enforcement of EU Values and the Tyranny of National Identity ֊ Polish Examples and Excuses. — Verfassungsblog 26.11.2019. Kättesaadav: https: / / verfassungsblog.de/enforcement-of-eu-values-and-the-tyranny-ofnational-identity-polish-examples-and-excuses/ ■ Zonnekeyn, G. The Direct Effect of GATT in Community Law: From International Fruit Company to the Banana Cases. — ITLR 1996/2 S06
Kasutatud kirjandus T ■ Taborowski, Μ. Joined cases C-392/04 C-422/04: i-21 Germany GmbH (C-392/04), Arcor AG Co. KG (C-422/04), formerly ISIS Multimedia Net GmbH Co. KG. ֊ CMLR 2007/5 ■ Tallberg, J. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. — IO 2002/3 ■ Talvik, E. Legaalsuse põhimõte Eesti Vabariigi põhiseaduse tekkimises, muutmistes ja muutmiskavades. Tartu Ülikool 1991 • Taro, A. Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse rikkumisega tekitatud kahju. Ühenduse liikmesriigi vastutus. ֊Juridica 2003/3 ' Taska, A. Õigusteaduslikke mõtteid. Lund 1989 ■ Taylor, C (Hrsg). Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung. Fischer 1993 “ Terhechte, J. P. Judicial Accountability and Public Liability — The German „Judges Privilege“ Under the Influence of European and International Law. ֊ GLJ 2012/3 ■ Theodossiou, Μ. A. An Analysis of the Recent Response of the Community to Non Compliance with Court of Justice Judgments: Article 228(2) E.C. — ELR 2002/1 ■ Thomas, R., Lynch-Wood, G. Transposing European Union Law in the United Kingdom: Administrative Rule-making, Scrutiny and Better Regulation. — EPL 2008/2 ’ Thym, D. Separation versus Fusion — or: How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. ֊ ECLR 2013/3 ■ Thym, D. The Intergovernmental Constitution of the EU’s Foreign, Security and Defence Executive. — ECLR 2011/3 ■ Tomuschat, C. Saksa Liidukonstitutsioonikohus ja Euroopa õiguse ülimuslikkus. ֊ Juridica 2010/5 ■ Toomiste, Μ. Riigikohtu nõuandev funktsioon õigusloomes: kas
tõesti ise sööme, ise joome, ise nõud ka ära toome? — Juridica 2018/10 ■ Toomiste, Μ. Seisukoha küsimine Riigikohtult: kasutamata võimalus? Magistritöö,Tartu Ülikool 2017 ■ Toonen,T., Steunenberg, B. et a¡. Saying No to a European Constitution: Dutch Revolt, Enigma or Pragmatism? ֊ ZSEW 2006/4 ' Tornberg, N. The Commission’s Communications on the General Good ֊ Magna Carta or LawMaking? - EBLR 1999/1 -2 ■ Torres Perez, A. Constitutional Dialogue on the European Arrest Warrant: the Spanish Constitutional Court Knocking on Luxembourg’s Door. — ECLR 2012/1 ■ Torres Perez, A. Melloni in Three Acts: From Dialogue to Monologue. — ECLR 2014/2 • Trachtman, J. P. Bananas, Direct Effect and Compliance. — EJIL 1999/4 ' Treib, О., Bähr, H et al. Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. — JEPP 2007/1 ■ Treumer, S. Denmark as a Daredevil in ELI Public Procurement Law: Implementation of Directive 2014/24/EU. ֊ PPLR 2019/5 • Tridimas, T. Constitutional Review of Member State Action: The Virtues and Vices of an 507
Kasutatud kirjandus Incomplete Jurisdiction. ֊ IJCL 2011/3—4 ■ Tridimas, T. General Principles of EU Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 2006 ■ Tridimas, T. Horizontal Effect of Directives: A Missed Opportunity. — ELR 1994/6 ■ Tridimas, T, Gari, G. Winners and Losers in Luxembourg: A Statistical Analysis of Judicial Review Before the European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance (2001-2005). — ELR 2010/2 ■ Tridimas,T., Lonardo, L.When Can a National Measure be Annulled by the ECJ? Case C-202/18 Ilmars Rimsevics v Republic of Latvia and Case C-238/18 European Central Bank v Republic of Latvia. — ELR 2020/5 ■ Triipan, Μ. Proportsionaalsuse põhimõte Euroopa Liidu õiguses. ■ Tsadiras, A. Maladministration and Life Beyond Legality:The European Ombudsman’s Paradigm. -IRL2015/3 ■ Tsadiras, A. Rules of Institutional “Flat-sharing”: The European Ombudsman and His National Peers.-ELR 2008/1 ■ Tsadiras, A. The European Ombudsman’s Remedial Powers: An Empirical Analysis in Context. -ELR 2013/1 ■ Tsadiras, A. The Position of the European Ombudsman in the Community System of Judicial Remedies. — ELR 2007/ 5 ■ TupitSjA. Kas võlakriis muudab Euroopa Liidu ja tema liikmesriikide padevusi? —Juridica 2012/1 Juridica 2006/3. U ■ Uustalu, H. Lissaboni leping — samm demokraatlikuma, efektiivsema ja läbipaistvama Euroopa poole. — Juridica 2008/5 V ■ Vahing, J. Euroopa ühenduste kohtu ja Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide kohtute ning Eesti kui võimaliku liikmesriigi kohtute vaheline koostöö. — Juridica 1998/5 ■ Vajda, C. Democracy in the European Union: what has the Court of Justice
to say? — CJICL 2015/2 ■ Vallikivi, H. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni kasutamine Riigikohtu praktikas. — Juridica 2001/6 ■ Van Bockel, B., Wattéi, P. New Wine into Old Wineskins: The Scope of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU after Åkerberg Fransson. — ELR 2013/6 ■ Van Calster, G.The EU’sTower of Babel —The Interpretation by the European Court of Justice of Equally Authentic Texts Drafted in More Than One Official Language. —YEL 1997 ■ Van den Bossche, A.-Μ. Private Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and Article 19(1) TEU: Two’s Company,Three’s a Crowd. —YEL 2014 ■ Van der Schyff, G. The Constitutional Relationship Between the European Union and its Member States: the Role of National Identity in Article 4(2)TEU. — ELR 2012/5 S08
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Van Elsuwege, P., Gremmelprez, F. Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the European Court of Justice. — ECLR 2020/1 ■ Van Elsuwege, P., Petrov, R. (ed). Legislative Approximation and Application of EU Law in the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union: Towards a Common Regulatory Space? Routledge 2014 ■ Van Middelaar, L. Teekond Euroopasse. Kuidas kontinendist sai liit. Eesti Maailmavaate Sihtasutus 2009 ■ Van Rossen, J. W. Interaction Between EU Law and International Law in the Light of Intertanko and Kadi: The Dilemma of Norms Bindings the Member States but not the Community. — NYIL 2009 ■ VanVooren, B. A Case-Study of„Soft Law”in EU External Relations: the European Neighbourhood Policy. ELR 2009 /S ■ Vene, E. Avaliku halduse kandja tekitatud kahju hüvitamine. Kohtupraktika ja riigivastutusõigus de legeferenda. — Juridica 2000/S ■ Verstraelen, S.The Temporal Limitation of Judicial Decisions:The Need for Flexibility Versus the Quest for Uniformity. — GLJ 2013/9 ■ Ver vaele, J. The European Arrest Warrant and Applicable Standards of Fundamental Rights in the EU.-REAL 2013/2 ■ Vesterdorf, B. A Constitutional Court for the EU? ֊֊ IJCL 2006/4 ■ Vianello, I. Upholding a Principled Approach to the Use of EU Administrative Activities Externally: What Role for the Court of Justice of the European Union? —YEL 2018 ■ Vilms, К. Demokraatia printsiip Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse printsiibina. — Juridica 2001 / S ■ Violante,T. Bring Back the Politics:The PSPP Ruling in Its Institutional Context. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Vogiatzis, N.
Exploring the European Council’s Legal Accountability: Court of Justice and European Ombudsman. — GLJ 2013/9 ■ Vogiatzis, N. The European Ombudsman and Good Administration in the European Union. Palgrave McMillan 2018 ■ Vogt, Μ. Indirect Judicial Protection in EC Law —the Case of the Plea of Illegality — ELR 2006/3 ■ Von Bogdandy, A.The European Union as a Human Rights Organization? Human Rights and the Core of the European Union. — CLMR 2000/6 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Bast, J. (ed). Principles of European Constitutional Law. Revised 2nd Edition. Hart, С. H. Beck, Nomos 2011 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Cruz Villalón, P. et al. (Hrsg). Handbuch lus Publicum Europaeum. Band II: Offene Staatlichkeit — Wissenschaft vom Verfassungsrecht. Müller Verlag 2008 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Schill, S. Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity Under the Lisbon Treaty. — CMLR 2011/5 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Spieker, L. D. Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Article 2 TEU Values, Reverse Solange, and the Responsibilities of National Judges. — ECLR 2019/3 ■ Von Papp, K. A Federal Question Doctrine for EU Fundamental Rights Law: Making Sense of Articles 51 and 53 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. —ELR 2018/4 S09
Kasutatud kirjandus W ■ Wahl, N., Prete, L.The Gatekeepers of Article 267TFEU: On Jurisdiction and Admissibility of References for Preliminary Rulings. — CMLR 2018/2 ■ Waldhoff, C. Recent Developments Relating to the Retroactive Effect of Decisions of the ECJ. -CMLR 2009/1 ■ Walker, N. (ed). Sovereignty in Transition. Hart Publishing 2003 ■ Walker, N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. — MLR 2002/3 ■ Ward, A. Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You: Willy Kempter and the Duty to Raise EC Law in National Litigation. - ELR 2008/5 ■ Weatherill, S., Beaumont, P. EU Law. 3rd Edition. Penguin Books 1999 ■ Weil, P.Towards Relative Normativity in International Law? ֊AJIL 1983/3 ■ Weiler, J. A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors. — CPS 1994/4 ■ Weiler, J. The Community System: the Dual Character of Supranationalism. —YEL 1981 ■ Weiler, J., Lockhart, N. „Taking Rights Seriously“ Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence — Part II. — CMLR 1995/2 ■ Weiß, W. Human Rights in the EU: Rethinking the Role of the European Convention on Human Rights after Lisbon. — ECLR 2011/1 ■ Wellens, K. C., Borchardt, G. Μ. Soft Law in European Community Law. — ELR 1989/5 ■ Wendel, Μ. Exceeding Judicial Competence in the Name of Democracy: The German Federal Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference — ECLR 2014/2 ■ Wendel, Μ. Lisbon Before the Courts: Comparative Perspectives. — ECLR 2011/1 ■ Wendel, Μ. Paradoxes of Ultra-Vires Review: A Critical Review of the PSPP Decision and Its Initial Reception. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Wildhaber, L.,
Diggelmann, O. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsioon ja eraelu kaitse. Uuemad arengusuunad. — Juridica 2007/1 ■ Willems, A.The Court of Justice of the European Union’s Mutual Trust Journey in EU Criminal Law: From a Presumption to (Room for) Rebuttal. — GLJ 2019/4 ■ Williams, G. Language and the Law. — LQR 1945/61 ■ Winter, J. A. Direct Applicability and Direct Effect, Two Distinct and Different Concepts in Community Law. - CMLR 1972/4 ■ Wouters, J., Nollkaemper, A. et al. (ed).The Europeanisation of International Law:The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States.T.M.C. Asser Press 2008, p 219 X • Xanthaki, H. Drafting Legislation. Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation. Hart Publishing 2014 510 |
| adam_txt |
SISUKORD Eessõna. 10 Autorist. 13 Kasutatud lühendid. 14 I EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE SUHE EESTI ÕIGUSEGA. 19 1.1 Euroopa Liidu õiguse sidumine Eesti õiguskorraga.22 1.2 Euroopa Liitu kuulumise põhiseaduslik volitus ja selle piirangud. 24 1.2.1 Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted. 24 1.2.2 Liidu integratsioonitase. 30 1.3 Euroopa Liidu õiguse esimus. 36 1.3.1 Euroopa Kohtu vaade.39 1.3.2 Vaade läbi Eesti põhiseaduse prisma. .43 1.3.2.1 N or matiivne argument.47 1.3.2.1 a Ekskurss: võimalik toetus Euroopa Liidu õigusest. .48 1.3.2.2 Doktrinaalne
argument. 54 1.3.3 Esimuse põhimõtte praktiline tähendus. 56 1.3.3.1 Kooskõlaline tõlgendamine. 58 1.3.3.1 a Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise lai haare. 62 1.3.3.1 b Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise piirid. 64 1.3.3.2 Riigisisese normi kohaldamata jätmine. 68 1.3.3.2 a Ekskurss: Euroopa Liidu õiguse vahetu õigusmõju. 70 1.3.3.2 b Repriis : riigisisese normi kohaldamata j ätmine. 75 1.3.3.2 c Blokeeriv toime ja asendav toime. 82 1.3.3.3 Kooskõlaline tõlgendamine vs normi kohaldamata jätmine. 83 1.3.3.4 Lõplikuks muutunud haldusaktide uuesti läbivaatamine. 85 1.3.3.4 a Kühne Heitzi doktriin.87 1.3.3.4 b Võrdväärsuse ja tõhususe põhimõtete toime. 94 1.3.3.5 Kohtuotsuse seadusjõu põhimõttest erandite tegemine. 96 1.4 Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtete kohtulik kaitse. 102 1.4.1 Identiteedikontroll. 102 1.4.1.1 Identiteedikontrolli menetlus- ja
materiaalõiguslikke aspekte. 108 1.4.2 Ultra vires kontroll. 112 1.4.2.1 Ultra vires kontrolli menetlus- ja materiaalõiguslikke aspekte. 117 II EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE ALLIKAD. 125 2.1 Euroopa Liidu esmane õigus.128 2.1.1 Liidu aluslepingud. 128 2.1.2 Liidu põhiõiguste harta. 129 2.1.2.1 Harta kohaldamisala. 134 2.1.2.1 a Harta kohaldamine liikmesriikide suhtes. 135 6
Sisukord 2.1.2. laa Agendisituatsioon. 139 2.1.2.1 ab Körvalekaldesituatsioon.141 2.1.2.l ae Materiaalõigusliku seose situatsioon. 142 2.1.2.2 Harta vahetu õigusmõju. 145 2.1.2.3 Seos Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooniga.151 2.1.2.4 Suhe liikmesriikide põhiseadustega. 155 2.1.3 Liidu õiguse üldpõhimõtted. 165 2.1.3.1 Üldpõhimõtete vahetu õigusmõju. 170 2.2 Euroopa Liidu osalusega rahvusvahelised lepingud. 176 2.2.1 Rahvusvahelise lepingu vahetu õigusmõju. 181 2.3 Rahvusvaheline kirjutamata õigus. 186 2.4 Euroopa Liidu teisene õigus. 187 2.4.1 Määrus. 188 2.4.1.1 Määruse üldine kohaldatavus. 188 2.4.1.2 Määruse terviklik
siduvus. 189 2.4.1.3 Määruse vahetu kohaldatavus. 189 2.4.1.4 Määruse vahetu õigusmõju. 191 2.4.2 Direktiiv. 192 2.4.2.1 Direktiivi ülevõtmine. 193 2.4.2.1 a Direktiivi ülevõtmise vorm ja meetod. 195 2.4.2. laa Vorm. 196 2.4.2.l ab Meetod. 197 2.4.2.1 b Direktiivi ülevõtmise tähtaeg ja selle toime. 199 2.4.2.2 Direktiivi vahetu õigusmõju. .203 2.4.2.2a Rikkumine direktiivi ülevõtmisel. 205 2.4.2.2b Sätte tingimusetus ja piisav täpsus. 206 2.4.2.2c Direktiivile tuginemine riigi vastu. 207 2.4.2.2ca Riik ja riigi tuletis. 212 2.4.2.3 Direktiivi juhuslik õigusmõju. 215 2.4.2.3a
Kolmnurksuhted. 215 2.4.2.3b Juhuslikud horisontaalsed mõjud. 217 2.4.2.4 Direktiiviga kooskõlaline tõlgendamine.219 2.4.2.4a Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise kohustuse tekke aeg. 223 2.4.2.4b Kooskõlalise tõlgendamise laiendatud juhud. 224 2.4.3 Otsus. 226 2.4.3.1 Otsuse vahetu õigusmõju.227 2.4.4 Soovitus, arvamus ja muud pehme õiguse aktid. 230 2.4.4.1 Pehme õiguse praktiline ja õiguslik toime. 233 III EUROOPA LIIDU ÕIGUSE TÕLGENDAMINE. 239 3.1 Üldised lähtekohad Euroopa Liidu õiguse tõlgendamisel.242 3.2 Normiteksti eri keeleversioonide vastuolude ületamine. 246 7
Sisukord 3.3 Euroopa Liidu õigusmõistete autonoomne tähendus. 250 3.4 Ettevalmistavad materjalid tõlgendusargumendina. 252 3.5 Õigusakti põhjendused tõlgendusargumendina. 255 IV ÕIGUSTE JA ÕIGUSKORRA KAITSE EUROOPA LIIDU ASJADES. 259 4.1 Rikkumismenetlus liikmesriigi suhtes. 259 4.1.1 Rikkumismenetluse ajend. 260 4.1.2 Rikkumismenetluse subjekt. 261 4.1.3 Rikkumismenetluse ese. 262 4.1.4 Rikkumismenetluse algatamise otsustamine. 266 4.1.5 Eelmenetlus. 269 4.1.5.1 Ametlik kiri. 270 4.1.5.2 Põhjendatud arvamus. 271 4.1.6 Rikkumishagi esitamine. 273 4.1.7 Rikkumishagi nõue. 275
4.1.8 Rikkumishagi lahendamine.279 4.1.9 Rahaline sanktsioon.287 4.1.10 Ajutised meetmed. 293 4.1.11 Kohtuotsuse täitmise tähtaeg. 296 4.2 Liikmesriigi hagi teise liikmesriigi vastu. 298 4.3 Euroopa Kohtult eelotsuse küsimine.300 4.3.1 Eelotsust küsima õigustatud asutused.304 4.3.2 Liikmesriigi kohtu õigus eelotsust küsida. 309 4.3.2.1 Kohtu funktsioonide eristamine eelotsuse küsimisel. 313 4.3.2.2 Menetlusosaliste seisukohtade ja taotluse mõju. 313 4.3.2.3 Edasikaebus eelotsuse küsimise otsuse peale. 316 4.3.3 Liikmesriigi kohtu kohustus eelotsust küsida. 319 4.3.3.1 Kohtu rollist tulenev kohustus. 319 4.3.3.2 Õigusküsimuse sisust tulenev kohustus. 321 4.3.3.3 Erandid kohustusest eelotsust
küsida.324 4.3.3.3 a Acte éclairé doktriin.325 4.3.3.3 b Acte clair doktriin. 325 4.3.3.3 c Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni mõju. 328 4.3.4 Eelotsusetaotluse koostamine. 330 4.3.5 Eelotsusetaotluse vastuvõetavus. 333 4.3.5.1 Puhtalt riigisisesed olukorrad. 334 4.3.5.1 a Renroi-situatsioonide erand.335 4.3.5.1 b Liidu põhivabaduste võimaliku mõjutamise erand.336 4.3.5.1 c Pöörddiskrimineerimist keelava sätte erand. 339 4.3.5.2 Asjakohatud, hüpoteetilised ja kunstlikud küsimused. 340 4.3.5.3 Tühistamishagi esitamise võimaluse kasutamatajätmine. 341 8
Sisukord 4.3.S.За Kohtu omaalgatuse erand.343 4.3.6 Eelotsusetaotluse lahendamine. 347 4.3.7 Eelotsuse toime. 349 4.3.7.1 Eelotsuse ajaline mõju.353 4.4 Hagi Euroopa Liidu akti tühistamiseks. 357 4.4.1 Vaidlustatavad aktid. 357 4.4.1.1 Ühise valis- ja julgeolekupoliitika erand. 362 4.4.1.2 Vaidlustatavad aktid mitteprivilegeeritud hagejatele. 366 4.4.2 Kaebeõigusega isikud. 373 4.4.2.1 Kaebeõiguse eeltingimused. 375 4.4.3 Tühistamise alused. 377 4.4.4 Võistlev menetlus. 380 4.4.5 Tühistamishagi lahendamine. 381 4.4.6 Tühistamishagi esitamise tähtaeg. 385
4.4.7 Kohtuotsuse toime. 388 4.5 Kaebus Euroopa Ombudsmanile. 391 4.5.1 Kaebuse esitamine.394 4.5.2 Kaebuse lahendamine. 396 4.6 Euroopa Liidu õiguse rikkumisega tekitatud kahju hüvitamine.401 4.6.1 Kahjunõue Euroopa Liidu vastu. .402 4.6.1.1 Liidu vastutuse eeltingimused.404 4.6.1.1a Kahju teke ja laad.405 4.6.1.1b Liidu õiguserikkumine. .408 4.6.1.1c Rikutud normist üksikisikule õiguste tulenemine. .409 4.6.1.Id Õigusrikkumise piisav selgus.410 4.6.1.1 e Otsene põhjuslik seos. 411 4.6.1.2 Hagi esitamisega seotud küsimusi. .412 4.6.2 Kahjunõue liikmesriigi vastu. .416 4.6.2.1 Riigivastutuse
eeltingimused. .419 4.6.2.1 a Riigisiseste reeglite lubatavus ja keelatus. .421 4.6.2.2 Vastutav riigiorgan. .423 Kasutatud kohtupraktika. .430 Kasutatud kirjandus. .480 Muud materjalid. 511 9
KASUTATUD KIRJANDUS A ■ A. A. The Incidental Effect of Directives. — ELR 1999/1 ■ A.R. E.C. Law and the MIB Agreements. — JPIL 2001 /4 ■ Aarnio, A. Õiguse tõlgendamise teooria. Juura 1996 ■ Aaviksoo, В. (Konstitutsiooniline) renvoi : kas põhiseaduslik nõue või kaera Trooja hobusele? — Juridica 201S / 2 ■ Abbott, K. W, Snidai, D. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. — ІО 2003/3 ■ Academy of European Law (ed). Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Volume V, Book 2. Kluwer Law International 1997 ■ Adams, Μ., Meeusen, J. et al. (ed). Judging Europe’s Judges: the Legitimacy of Case Law of the European Court of Justice Examined. Hart Publishing 2013 ■ Aedmaa, A., Lopman, E. jt. Haldusmenetluse käsiraamat.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2004 ■ Ahi, К. Rahvuslik parlament Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse kontekstis. — Juridica 1999/6 ■ Albi, A. Euroliit ja kaasaegne suveräänsus. Üks võimalikke vastukajasid põhiseaduse ekspertiisikomisjoni üleskutsele aruteluks. — Juridica 2000/3 • Albi, A. Euroopa põhiseaduse leping: kas põhiseadus või välisleping? — Juridica 2005/1 ■ Albi, A. Põhiseaduse muutmine Euroopa Liitu astumiseks. Ekspertarvamused, teoreetiline ja võrdlevõiguslik perspektiiv ning protseduur. — Juridica 2001 /9 • Albi, A., Gallagher, Μ. jt. Ühispöördumine seoses nn Põhiseaduse Kolmanda Akti riigiõiguslike probleemidega. — Juridica 2002/5 ■ Albi, A., Bardutzky, S. (ed). National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. T.M.C. Asser Press 2019 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. Keeping Up Appearances: the Court of Justice and the Effects of
EU Directives. — CLJ 2010/3 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. Private Parties in European Community Law: Challenging Community Measures. Clarendon Press 1996 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. The Commission’s Powers in the Enforcement of Directives: a Step Forward? - ELR 2000/5 ■ Albors-Llorens, A.The Direct Effect of EU Directives: Fresh Controversy or a Storm in aTeacup? Comment on Portgas. — ELR 2014/6 ■ Albors-Llorens, A. The European Court of Justice, More than a Teleological Court. — CYELS 1999 ■ Alemanno, A. How Much Better is Better Regulation? Assessing the Impact of the Better Regulation Package. — EJRR 2015/6 ■ Alexy, R. Theorie der Grundrechte. Suhrkamp 1985 ■ Allikmets, S. Tuntud või timdmatu hea halduse põhimõte. — Juridica 2014/3 ■ Alonso García, R. The Spanish Constitution and the European Constitution: The Script for a Virtual Collision and Other Observations on the Principle of Primacy. — GLJ 2005/6 480
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Alter, К. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford University Press 2003 ■ Alter, K.The European Court’s Political Power. Selected Essays. Oxford University Press 2009 ■ Amalfitano, C., Pollicino, О. Two Courts,Two Languages? The Taricco Saga Ends on aWorrying Note. - Verfassungsblog 05.06.2018. Kättesaadav: https:// verfassungsblog.de/two-courts-two-languages-the-taricco-saga-ends-ona-worrying-note / ■ Amtenbrink, F., Repasi, R. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision in Weiss: A Contextual Analysis. — ELR 2020/6 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Activation of the Ultra Vires Review: The Slovak Pensions Judgment of the Czech Constitutional Court. — GLJ 2013/7 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Balancing Conflicting Fundamental Rights: The Sky Österreich Paradigm. — ELR 2014/5 ■ Anagnostaras, G. Solange III? Fundamental Rights Protection Under the National Identity Review. - ELR 2017/2 ■ Anagnostaras, G. The Allocation of Responsibility in State Liability Actions for Breach of Community Law: a Modern Gordian Knot? — ELR 2001 / 2 ■ Andenas, Μ., Bekkedal,T. et al. (ed).The Reach of Free Movement.T.Μ.C. Asser Press 2017 ■ Andenas, Μ., Jacobs, E (ed). European Community Law in the English Courts. Oxford University Press 1998 • Anderson, D., Demetriou, Μ. References to the European Court. 2nd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 2002 ■ Andresen, E. Riigivastutus ilma riigi vastutuseta: notari, kohtutäituri ja vandetõlgi isiklik ametivastutus Euroopa õiguse ja riigiõiguse vaatepunktis. — Juridica 2006/9 ■ Andresen, E.
Õigusvastaste tagajärgede kõrvaldamine ja kahju hüvitamine riigivastutusõiguses. — Juridica 2006/3 ■ Annus,T. Kohtud kui poliitilised institutsioonid. — Juridica 2007/9 ■ Anton, S. Eesti kultuuri ja rahvuse mõistes põhiseadus preambulis. — Riigiõiguse aastaraamat 2020 ■ Arcari, Μ. The Creeping Constitutionalization and Fragmentation of International Law: From „Constitutional” to „Consistent” Interpretation. — PYIL 2013 ■ Arden, Μ. Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe. —YEL 2010 ■ Arena, A. From an Unpaid Electricity Bill to the Primacy of EU Law: Gian Galeazzo Stendardi and the Making of Costa v. ENEL. — EJIL 2019/3 ■ Arnull, A. EU Recommendations and Judicial Review. — ECLR 2018/3 ■ Arnull, A. Tasting the Difference. — ELR 1987/6 ■ Arnull, A. The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford University Press 2000 ■ Arnull, A. The European Court and Judicial Objectivity: a Reply to Professor Hartley. — LQR ■ Arnull, A. The Legal Status of Recommendations. — ELR 1990/4 ■ Arnull, A., Barnard, C. et al. (ed). A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour 1996/112 481
Kasutatud kirjandus of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing 2011 ■ Armili, A., Chalmers, D. (ed). The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Arrowsmith, S. A Note on Case C262/92: Commission v Italy. — PPLR 1994/3 ■ Astresses, P.-V. The Return of the Huron, or Naive Thoughts on the Handling of Article 267 TFEU by Constitutional Courts when Referring to the Court of Justice. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Azoulai, L. (ed).The Question of Competence in the European Union. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Atthoff, K., Wallgren, Μ. Clarifying Gold-Plating — Better Implementation of EU Legislation. Board of Swedish Industry and Commerce for Better Regulation / Swedish Better Regulation Council 2012 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Constitutional Pluralism and Authoritarianism. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Revitalisation of EU Constitutionalism. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Avbelj, Μ. Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law — (Why) Does it Matter? — ELJ 2011/6 ■ Avbelj, Μ., Komárek, J (ed). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Hart Publishing 2012 В ■ Baldwin, R. Rules and Government. Clarendon Press 1997 ■ Balthasar, S. Locus Standi Rules for Challenges to Regulatory Acts by Private Applicants: The New Art.263(4) TFEU. — ELR 2010/4 ■ Banks, K., von Rintelen, G. Infringement Procedures and the Juncker Commission. — ELR 2020/5 ■ Barav, A. Failure of Member States to Fulfil Their Obligations Under Community Law. — CMLR 1975/3 ■ Barav, A. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Princeton University Press 2005 ' Barav, A. The Judicial Power of the European Economic Community. — SCLR 1980/2 ■ Barczentewicz,
Μ. Judicial Duty Not to Apply EU Law. — LQR 2017/133 ■ Barents, R. The Precedence of EU Law from the Perspective of Constitutional Pluralism. — ECLR 2009/3 ■ Barnard (ed), C. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Oxford University Press 2007 ■ Bast, J. Don’t Act Beyond Your Powers: The Perils and Pitfalls of the German Constitutional Court’s Ultra Vires Review. — GLJ 2014/2 ■ Bast, J., Orgad, L. Constitutional Identity in the Age of Global Migration. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Baxter, R. R. International Law in „Her Infinite Variety“. — ICLQ 1980/4 ■ Beatson, J.,Tridimas,T. (ed). New Directions in European Public Law. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Bebr, G. The Existence of a Genuine Dispute: an Indispensable Precondition for the Jurisdiction of the Court Under Article 177 EEC Treaty? — CMLR 1980/2 ■ Beck, G. The Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: a Conflict Between Right and Right in Which 482
Kasutatud kirjandus There is No Praetor. — ELR 2005/1 ■ Becker, F. Application of Community Law by Member States’ Public Authorities: Between Autonomy and Effectiveness. — CMLR 2007/4 ■ Bengoetxea, J. The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: Towards a European Jurisprudence. Clarendon Press 1993 ■ Bergkamp, L. Private Party Standing and EU Risk Regulation. Expanded Standing Rights in the Public Interest. — EJRR 2016/3 ■ Bergstrom, C. F. Defending Restricted Standing for Individuals to Bring Direct Actions Against „Legislatíve“ Measures. — ECLR 2014/3 ■ Bernitz, U., Nergelius, J (ed). General Principles of European Community Law. Kluwer Law International 2000 ■ Besselink, L. National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon. — ULR 2010/3 ■ Besselink, L.The Parameters of Constitutional Conflict after Melloni. — ELR 2014/4 • Besselink, L., Bonelli, Μ. Back and Forth Between Sovereignty and Constitutionalism: the Court of Justice’s Constitutional Case Law. — ECLR 2018/4 ■ Betlem, G. Case C-28/95: Leur-Bloem v. Inspecteur der Belastingdienst/ Ondernemingen Amsterdam 2, [1997] ECR 1-4161 ,· Case C-130/95: Giloy v. Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am MainOst, [1997] ECR 1-4291. ֊CMLR 1999/1 ■ Betlem, G. The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation — Managing Legal Uncertainty. ֊ OJLS 2002/3 ■ Betlem, G., Nollkaemper, A. Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation. — EJIL 2003/3 ■ Beukers, T., Reestman, H.-R. On Courts of Last Resort and Lenders of Last
Resort. — ECLR 2015/2 ■ Biernat, S. How Far Is It from Warsaw to Luxembourg and Karlsruhe : The Impact of the PSPP Judgment on Poland. ֊ GLJ 2020/5 ■ Biondi, A., Eeckhout, P. et al. (ed). EU Law After Lisbon. Oxford University Press 2012 ■ Bjorge, E.The Evolutionary Interpretation ofTreaties. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Blumann, C., Dubois, L. Droit institutionnel de l’Union européenne, 2e édition. Paris 2005 • Bobek, Μ. Landtová, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court: Implications for the Preliminary Rulings Procedure. — ECLR 2014/1 ■ Bobek, Μ. On the Application of European Law in (Not Only) the Courts of the New Member States: „Don’t Do as I Say”? SSRN 2008 Kättesaadav: https: / /papers.ssrn.com/so!3/papers.cfm?abstract_id—1157841 ■ Bogojevic, S. Judicial Protection of Individual Applicants Revisited: Access to Justice through the Prism of Judicial Subsidiarity. —YEL 2015 ■ Bonelli, Μ. European Commission v Hungary (Transparency of associations) (C-78/18): The „NGOs case“: On How to Use the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Infringement Actions. -ELR 2021/2 ■ Bonnie, A. Commission Discretion Under Article 171(2) E.C. —ELR 1998/6 ■ Bonnor, P. G. The European Ombudsman: a novel source of soft law in the European Union. — 483
Kasutatud kirjandus ELR 2000/1 ■ Borchardt, K.-D. Liidu õiguse ABC. EL Väljaannete Talitus 2017 ■ Bourgeois, J. Effects of International Agreements in European Community Law: Are the Dice Cast? - MichLR 1984/5-6 ■ Boyle, A. E. Some Reflections on the Relationship ofTreaties and Soft Law. — ICLQ 1999/4 ■ Boyron, S. General Principles of Law and National Courts: Applying a Jus Commune? — ELR 1998/2 ■ Bradford, A. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press 2020 ■ Bredimas, A. Methods of Interpretation and Community Law. North-Holland Publishing 1978 ■ Bridge, J. American Analogues in the Law of the European Community. — AALR 1982/2 ■ Brittain, S. Justifying the Teleological Methodology of the European Court Of Justice: a Rebuttal. — Irish Jurist 2016/55 ■ Brkan, Μ. The Concept of Essence of Fundamental Rights in the EU Legal Order: Peeling the Onion to its Core. — ECLR 2018/2 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References as a Right — But for Whom? The Extent to Which Preliminary Reference Decisions Can be Subject to Appeal. — ELR 2011/2 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Right to a Fair Trial Under Article 6 ECHR. — ELR 2016/4 ■ Broberg, Μ., Fenger, N. Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Brown, L. N., Jacobs, F. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Sweet Maxwell 1989 • Brown, L. N., Kennedy, T. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Sweet Maxwell 1994 ■ Brummer, C. Soft Law and the Global
Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press 2011 ■ Bungenberg, Μ. The Multilateral Investment Court — Royal Road or Dead End for the EU Legal Order? -IBLJ 2019/5 ■ Burchardt, D. Intertwinement of Legal Spaces in the Transnational Legal Sphere. — LJIL 2017/2 " Burchardt, D. The Relationship Between the Law of the European Union and the Law of Its Member States — a Norm-based Conceptual Framework. — ECLR 2019/1 ■ Burley, A.-Μ., MattlijW. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. — IO 1993/1 • ' Butler, G. Independence of Non-judicial Bodies and Orders for a Preliminary Reference to the Court of Justice. — ELR 2020/6 ■ Butler, G., Šadl, U. The Preliminaries of a Reference. — ELR 2018/1 484
Kasutatud kirjandus C ■ Calliess, C., van der Schyff, G. (ed). Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press 2020 ■ Cameron, I. (ed). EU Sanctions: Law and Policy Issues Concerning Restrictive Measures. Intersentia 2013 ■ Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. et al. (ed). International Law as Law of the EuropeanUnion. Martinus Nijhoff2011 ■ Caro de Sousa, P. Catch Me IfYou Can?The Market Freedoms’ Ever-expanding Outer Limits. — EJLS2O11/2 ' Cartabia, Μ. Europe and Rights:Taking Dialogue Seriously. — ECLR 2009/1 ■ Chalmers, D. National Sovereignty and European Union Law. — ECLR 2021/3 ■ Chamon, Μ. Provisional Application of Treaties: The EU’s Contribution to the Development of International Law. — EJIL 2020/3 ■ Chinkin, C. Μ. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law. — ICLQ 1989/4 ■ Choudhury, B. Balancing Soft and Hard Law for Business and Human Rights. — ICLQ 2018/4 ■ Cini, Μ. The Soft Law Approach: Commission Rule-making in the EU’s State Aid Regime. — JEPP 2001/2 ■ Claes, Μ. Luxembourg, Here We Come? Constitutional Courts and the Preliminary Reference Procedure. — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Claes, Μ.The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution. Hart Publishing 2006 ■ Claes, Μ., Reestman, J.-H.The Protection of National Constitutional Identity and the Limits of European Integration at the Occasion of the Gauweiler Case — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Coman-Kund, F., Amtenbrink, F. On the Scope and Limits of the Application of National Law by the European Central Bank within the Single Supervisory Mechanism. — BFLR
2018/2 ■ Comba, M. E., Richetto, S. Implementation of Public Procurement Directives in Italy: After Three Years, Still a LongWay to be Completed. — PPLR 2019/5 ■ Conway, G. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge University Press 2012 ■ Cortright, D., Lopez, G. A. (ed). Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft. Rowman Littlefield 2002 “ Cosma, H. A., Whish, R. Soft Law in the Field of EU Competition Policy. — EBLR 2003/1 ■ Cragl, P. (Judicial) Love is not a One-Way Street: The EU Preliminary Reference Procedure as a Model for ECtHR Advisory Opinions Under Draft Protocol No. 16. — ELR 2013/2 ■ Craig, P. Directives: Direct Effect, Indirect Effect and the Construction of National Legislation. -ELR 1997/6 ■ Craig, P. EU Administrative Law. 1st edition. Oxford University Press 2006 ■ Craig, P. Once More unto the Breach: The Community, the State and Damages Liability. — LQR 1997/113 • Craig, P.The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis. — CMLR 2011/2 ■ Craig, P.The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions. — ELR 2005/3 485
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Craig, P. The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, andTreaty Reform. Oxford University Press 2010 “ Craig, P., de Burea, G. EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Craig, P., de Burca, G. The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford University Press 2003 • Craig, P., Markakis, Μ. Gauweiler and the Legality of Outright Monetary Transactions. — ELR 2016/1 ■ Cramér, P. Does the Codification of the Principle of Supremacy Matter? — CYELS 2004 ■ Cremona, Μ., de Witte, B. EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals. Hart Publishing 2008 ■ Cross, E. D. Pre-emption of Member State Law in the European Economic Community: A Framework for Analysis - CMLR 1992/3 D ■ Dashwood, A.The Relationship Between the Member States and the European Union/European Community. — CMLR 2004/2 ■ Dashwood, A., Hillion, C (ed). The General Law of E.C. External Relations. Sweet Maxwell 2000 ■ Dashwood, A., Maresceau, Μ. (ed). Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape. Cambridge University Press 2008 ■ Dashwood, A., White, R. Enforcement actions under Articles 169 and 170 EEC. — ELR 1989/6 ■ Dawson, Μ. Fundamental Rights in European Union Policy-making: The Effects and Advantages of Institutional Diversity. — HRLR 2020/1 ■ Dawson, Μ. Soft Law and the Rule of Law in the European Union: Revision or Redundancy? — EUIWP 2009/24 ■ De la Rochere, J. D. Challenges for the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU at theTime of the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty. — FILJ 2010/6 ■ De Mars, S.The Limits of General
Principles: A Procurement Case Study. — ELR 2013/3 ■ De Mol, Μ. Dominguez: A Deafening Silence. — ECLR 2012/2 ■ De Mol, Μ. Kücükdeveci: Mangold Revisited — Horizontal Direct Effect of a General Principle of EU Law. - ECLR 2010/2 ■ Delmas-Marty, Μ., Fronza, E. et al. (ed). Les sources du droit international penal. Société de législation compare 2005 ■ Dehousse, R. Law as Politics. — EUP 2002/1 ■ Dehousse, R. The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration. Palgrave Macmillan 1998 ■ Dermine, P. The End of Impunity? The Legal Duties of „Borrowed“ EU Institutions Under the European Stability Mechanism Framework. — ELR 2017/2 ■ De Vries, H. P. Civil Law and the Anglo-American Lawyer: A Case-illustrated Introduction to Civil Law Institutions and Method. Dobbs Ferry 1976 ■ Diez-Hochleitner, J. Le traité de Maastricht et l’inexécution des arrêts de la Cour de Justice par 486
Kasutatud kirjandus les Etats members. — RMUE 1994/2 ■ Di Salvatore, E. L’identità costituzionale dell’Unione Europea e degli stati membri. Il decentramento politico-istituzionale nel processo di integrazione. Giappichelli 2008 ■ Dobbs, Μ. Sovereignty, Artide 4(2) TEU and the Respect of National Identities: Swinging the Balance of Power in Favour of the Member States? — YEL 2014 ■ Donegan, T. ESMA Sounds a Death-knell for Cross-border Exchange Access, in Conflict with UK Legislation and the MiFIR. — JIBLR 2018/6 ■ Dougan, Μ. Judicial Review of Member State Action under the General Principles and the Charter: Defining the „Scope of Union Law“. — CMLR 201S/S ■ Dougan, Μ. National Remedies Before the Court of Justice: Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation. Hart Publishing 2004 ■ Dougan, Μ. The „Disguised“ Vertical Direct Effect of Directives? — CLJ 2000/ 3 ■ Dougan, Μ. The Francovich Right to Reparation: Reshaping the Contours of Community Remedial Competence. — EPL 2000/1 ■ Douglas-Scott, S. Constitutional Law of the European Union. Longman Pearson 2002 ■ Douglas-Scott, S.The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. — HRLR 2011/4 ■ Drake, S. Twenty Years After Von Colson: the Impact of „Indirect Effect“ on the Protection of the Individual’s Community Rights. — ELR 2005/3 ■ Drinóczi, T. Constitutional Identity in Europe: the Identity of the Constitution. A Regional Approach. — GLJ 2020/2 ■ Dūmon, F. The Case-Law of the Court of Justice — A Critical Examination of the Methods of Interpretation. Europa Institut Luxembourg 1976 ' Dunoff, J. L.,Trachtman,
J. P. (ed). Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge University Press 2009 ■ Dyevre, A. Domestic Judicial Defiance in the European Union: A Systemic Threat to the Authority of EU Law? — YEL 2016 ■ Dyrberg, P. Horizontal Direct Effect v. Duty of Construction in the EEA?The Norwegian View. -ELR 2001/2 E ■ Eckes, C. Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order? — ELJ 2012/2 ■ Eeckhout, P. EU External Relations Law. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press 2011 ■ Eeckhout, P., Lopez-Escudero, Μ. (ed). The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis. Hart Publishing 2016 ■ Eerola, R., Mylly,T. jt. Euroopa Liidu õiguse alused.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2001 ■ El Boudouhi, S. The National Judge as an Ordinary Judge of International Law? Invocability of Treaty Law in National Courts. — LJIL 2015/2 ■ Eliantonio, Μ., Stefan, O. Soft Law Before the European Courts: Discovering a „Common 487
Kasutatud kirjandus Pattern“?-YEL 2018 ■ Eller, К. Demokraatia ja finantsstabiilsus. Õiguskantsleri taotlus Euroopa stabiilsusmehhanismi asutamislepingu artikli 4 lõike 4 põhiseadusele vastavuse kontrollimiseks. — Juridica 2012/5 ■ Ellis, J. General Principles and Comparative Law. — EJIL 2011/4 ■ Enchelmaier, S. Always at Your Service (Within Limits): the ECJ’s Case Law on Article 56TFEU (2006-11).-ELR 2011/5 ■ Eriksen, E. O., Fossum, J. E. (ed). Democracy in the European Union. Integration Through Deliberation? Routledge 2000 ■ Eriksson, A. European Court of Justice: Broadening the Scope of European Nondiscrimination Law. — IJCL 2009/4 ■ Erne, J. Euroopa Kohtu eelotsused. Nende taotlemine ja mõju siseriiklikule õiguskorrale. — Juridica 2000/5 ■ Erne, J. Üksikisiku õiguste kaitse Euroopa Ühenduse institutsiooni akti või tegevusetuse vaidlustamise kaudu. — Juridica 2005/10 ■ Erne, J. Üksikisiku õiguste kaitse juhul, kui riik rikub Euroopa Ühenduse õigust. — Juridica 2005/5 ■ Emits, Μ. Konkreetne normikontroll de lege latają de legejerenda. — Juridica 2001/8 ■ Emits, Μ. Millestki ürgsest ja kargest ning autoriteediröövist. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted. — RiTo 2011/24 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiõiguste mõiste ja tähtsus õigussüsteemis. — Juridica 1996/9 ■ Emits, Μ. Põhiõigused, demokraatia, õigusriik.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2011 ■ Emits, Μ. Tõlgendamisest Riigikohtu praktikas. — Juridica 2010/9 ■ Emits, Μ. Võimalikud põhiseaduse muudatused seoses Euroopa Liiduga ja riigi otsustusõiguse ülekandmisega. — Juridica 2019/1 ■ Emits, Μ. Õiguskantsler. — Juridica
2003/1 • Emits, Μ., Laurand, A. jt. ESM asutamisleping: rahvusvaheline leping ja malpropre Euroopa Liidu õigus. — Juridica 2012/5 ■ Emits, Μ, Laurand, A. Kolmanda akti tõusja langus. — Juridica 2017/1 ■ Eskridge Jr, W. N. Dynamie Statutory Interpretation. — UPLR 1987/6 F ■ Fabbrini, F. After the OMT Case: the Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States. — GLJ 2015/4 ■ Fabbrini, F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Faraguna, P. Constitutional Identity in the EU — A Shield or a Sword? — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Fastenrach, U. Relative Normativity in International Law. — EJIL 1993/4 ■ Feichtner, I. The German Constitutional Court’s PSPP Judgment: Impediment and Impetus for the Democratization of Europe. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Fennelly, N. Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice. — FILJ 1996/ 3 488
Kasutatud kirjandus Fernandez Esteban, M. L. The Rule of Law in the European Constitution. Kluwer Law International 1999 Ferran, E., Alexander, K. Can Soft Law Bodies be Effective? The Special Case of the European Systemic Risk Board. — ELR 2010/6 ■ Fontanelli, F. Implementation of EU Law through Domestic Measures after Fransson: the Court of Justice BuysTime and ,,Non֊preclusion”Troubles Loom Large. ֊ ELR 2014/5 ■ Fontanelli, F. The Invocation of the Exception of Non-Performance: A Case-Study on the Role and Application of General Principles of International Law of Contractual Origin. - CJICL 2012/1 ■ Forsythe, Μ. ATypology of Relationships between State and Non-State Justice Systems. ֊֊ JLPUL 2007/56 ■ Frantziou, E.The Binding Charter Ten Years on: More than a „Mere Entreaty“? —YEL 2019 ■ Frantziou, E. (Most of) the Charter of Fundamental Rights is Horizontally Applicable. — ECLR 2019/2 ■ Frese, M. J. The Development of General Principles for EU Competition Law Enforcement — The Protection of Legal Professional Privilege. — ECLR 2011/4 ■ Fromont, Μ. Le principe de sécurité juridique. — AJDA 1996/édition spéciale G ■ Garbagnati Ketvel, Μ.-G. The Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Respect of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. — ICLQ 2006/1 ■ Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. EU International Agreements Through a US Lens: Different Methods of Interpretation,Tests and the Issue of „Rights”. — ELR 2014/S ■ Gáspár Szilágyi, S .The „Primacy“ and „Direct Effect“ of EU International Agreements. SSRN 2020. Kättesaadav:
https://papers.ssrn.com/so!3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3S27683 ' Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E. et al. (ed). European Union Treaties: A Commentary. C. H. Beck, Hart 2015 • Georgieva, Z. Soft Law in EU Competition Law and its Judicial Reception in Member States: A Theoretical Perspective. — GLJ 201S/2 ■ Gerard, D., Lenaerts, K.The Structure of the Union According to the Constitution for Europe: the Emperor is Getting Dressed. — ELR 2004/ 3 ' Gerard, P., Verrijdt, W. Belgian Constitutional Court Adopts National Identity Discourse. — ECLR 2017/1 ■ Ghazaryan, N. Who Are the „Gatekeepers“?: In Continuation of the Debate on the Direct Applicability and the Direct Effect of EU International Agreements. —YEL 2018 ■ Ginter, C. Riigi vastutus õigusemõistmisel tekitatud kahju eest. — Juridica 2004/8 ■ Ginter, C., Narits, R. ESM asutamislepingu põhiseaduslikkus kui demokraatliku protsessi defitsiidi küsimus. — Juridica 2012/5 • Ginter, C., Schasmin, P. Euroopa Liidu direktiivide mõistmine ja mõju. — Juridica 2021/2 • Glashausser, A. Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpetation. — VLR 2005 /1 489
Kasutatud kirjandus ' Gold, J. Interpretation: The IMF and International Law. Kluwer Law International 1996 • Gormley, L. Judicial Review — Reflections on the New Dawn after the First Judgments of the General Court. ֊ ERT 2012/2 • Grabenwarter, C., Huber, P. Μ. et al. The Role of the Constitutional Courts in the European Judicial Network. — EPL 2021/1 ■ Greaves, R. The Nature and Binding Effect of Decisions Under Article 189 EC. — ELR 1996/1 ■ Grief, N. Direct Effect of Directives and Organs of the State. — ELR 1991/2 ■ Grimbergen, R. How Boundaries Have Shifted. On Jurisdiction and Admissibility in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure. — REAL 2015/2 ■ Grimm, D. A LongTime Coming. — GLJ 2020/5 " Groussot, X. Creation, Development and Impact of the General Principles of Community Law: Towards a jus commune europaeum? Intellecta docusys 2005 ' Groussot, X., Minssen, T. Res Judicata in the Court of Justice Case-Law: Balancing Legal Certainty with Legality. — ECLR 2007/3 ■ Groussot, X., Olsson, I. Clarifying or Diluting the Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights? —The Judgments in Åkerberg and Melloni. — LSELR 2013/Aut. " Guastaferro, B. Beyond the Exceptionalism of Constitutional Conflicts:The Ordinary Functions of the Identity Clause. —YEL 2012 H ■ Hadjiyianni, I.The European Union as a Global Regulatory Power. — OJLS 2021/1 " Halmai, G. National(ist) Constitutional Identity?: Hungary’s Road to Abuse Constitutional Pluralism. SSRN 2017. Kättesaadav: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2962969 ■ Harlow, C., Rawlings, R. Accountability and Law
Enforcement: the Centralised EU Infringement Procedure. — ELR 2006/4 ■ Harlow, C., Rawlings, R. Pressure Through Law. Routledge 1992 ■ Hartley, T. C. Constitutional Problems of the European Union. Hart Publishing 1999 ■ Hartley,T. C. Federalism, Courts and Legal Systems:The Emerging Constitution of the European Community. — AJCL 1986/2 ■ Hartley, T. C.The Constitutional Foundations of the European Union. — LQR 2001/117 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 1988 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 5th Edition. Oxford University Press 2003 ■ Hartley, T. C. The Foundations of European Community Law. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press 2007 ‘ Hedemann-Robinson, Μ. Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law. Legal Issues and Challenges. 2nd Edition. Routledge 2015 ■ Herzog, R., Gerken, L. Stop the European Court of Justice. EUobserver 10.09.2008. https:// 490
Kasutatud kirjandus euobserver.com/ opinion/ 26714 ■ Heukels, T., McDonnell, A. (ed). The Action for Damages in Community Law. Kluwer Law International 1997 ■ Hilson, C., Antony Downes, T. Making Sense of Rights: Community Rights in E.C. Law. — ELR 1999/2 ■ Hinsley, F. H. Sovereignty. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press 1986 ■ Hirv, L. Kas juriidilise isiku kriminaalvastutus on rahvusvahelise tavaõiguse norm? — Juridica 2018/6 ' Hodson, D., Maher, I. Soft Law and Sanctions: Economic Policy Co-ordination and Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact. ֊֊ JEPP 2004/5 ■ Hoevenaars, J., Krommendijk, J. Black Box in Luxembourg: The Bewildering Experience of National Judges and Lawyers in the Context of the Preliminary Reference Procedure. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Hofmann, A. Resistance Against the Court of Justice of the European Union. — ELR 2018/2 ■ Hofmann, H. Negotiated and Non-negotiated Administrative Rule-making: The Example of EC Competition Policy. — CMLR 2006/1 ■ Hofmann, H.,Türk, A. H. (ed). EU Administrative Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing 2006 • Hofstötter, В. Non-Compliance of National Courts: Remedies in European Community Law and Beyond.T.M.C. Asser Press 2005 ■ Holdgaard, R. External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses. Kluwer Law International 2008 I ■ Iglesias Sanchez, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? — ECLR 2018/1 ■ Itzcovich, G. The Interpretation of Community Law by the European Court of Justice. — GLJ 2009/5 J ■ Jaago, K.-S. Ülevõtmisperioodil
riigihangete direktiivide mõju riigisisesele õiguskorrale. — Juridica 2015/3 ■ Jackson, J. H. Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept. — AJIL 2003/4 ■ Jacobs, F. Human Rights in the European Union:The Role of the Court of Justice. — ELR 2001/4 ■ Jacobs, F. The Evolution of the European Legal Order. — CMLR 2004/ 2 ■ Jacobsohn, G. J. Constitutional Identity. Harvard University Press 2010 ■ Jacobsson, K. Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy. — JESP 2004/4 ■ Jaeger, T (Hrsg). Europa 4.0? Die EU im Angesicht politischer und technologischer Herausforderungen. Jan Sramek Verlag 2018 491
Kasutatud kirjandus • Jaklič, К. Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. Oxford University Press 2014 ■ Jancic, D (ed). National Parliaments After the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? Oxford University Press 2017 ■ Jans, J., de Lange, R. et al. Europeanisation of Public Law. Europa Law Publishing 2007 ■ Jans, J., Marseille, B. Competence Remains Competence? Reopening Decisions That Violate Community Law. — REAL 2007/1 ■ Jans, J.,Vedder, H. European Environmental Law. 3rd Edition. Europa Law Publishing 2008 ■ Jiangyuan, F. Breitsamer und Ulrich GmbH Co KG v Landeshaupstadt München: Be Careful with Small Portions of „Pre-Packed Food“. - EJRR 2017/1 ■ Justiitsministeerium. Põhiseaduseasjatundjatekogu tegevuse aruanne. 2018. Kättesaadav.-https:// www.just. ee / sites ì www.just. ee / files / pohiseaduse_asjatundjate_kogu_tegevusaruanne_2018. pdf ■ Jõks, A. Põhiseadus muutuste künnisel. — Postimees 16.04.2002 ■ Jäärats, K. Kõike ühe ja üks kõigi eest kakskümmend aastat hiljem. — RiTo 2020/41 ■ Järvamägi, R. Põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalve kohtu mõju seadusandjale. — Juridica 2006/6 ■ Jürgen, I. Materiaalõiguse ebaõige kohaldamine kui kohtuotsuse kohtuotsuse kassatsiooni korras tühistamise alus kriminaalmenetluses. — Juridica 2004/1 К ■ Kaczorowska, A. The Power of a National Competition Authority to Disapply National Law Incompatible with EC Law — and its Practical Consequences. — ECompLR 2004/9 ■ Kalamees, P. Tarbija õiguste kaitse maksekäsu kiirmenetluses Euroopa Kohtu praktika valguses. — Juridica 2019/8 ■ Kaieda, S. L. Extension of the Preliminary
Rulings Procedure Outside the Scope of Community Law: „The Dzodzi Line of Cases“. — EIoP 2000/11 ■ Kalmo, H. Euroopa Liidu õiguse ootamatud mõjud. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Kalmo, H. Kes peaks kaitsma Eesti põhiseadust? — Juridica 2010/5 ■ Kaimo, H. Mis on järel põhiseadusest? Veel kord Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse ülimuslikkusest. — Juridica 2008/9 ■ Kalmo, H. Põhiseaduse põkkumine Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartaga. — Juridica 2016/3 ■ Kalmo, K., Luts-Sootak, Μ. (toim). Iganenud või igavene? Tekste kaasaegsest suveräänsusest. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2010 ■ Kapteyn, P., VerLoren vanThemaat, P. Introduction to the Law of the European Communities After the Coming Into Force of the Single European Act. 2nd Edition. Springer Netherlands 1989 ■ Karatzia, A., Konstadinides,T.The Legal Nature and Character of Memoranda of Understanding as Instruments Used by the European Central Bank. — ELR 2019/4 ■ Kelemen, D. R. Suing for Europe: Adversarial Legalism and European Governance. — CPS 2006/1 ■ Kelemen, D. R., Pech, L. The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the 492
Kasutatud kirjandus Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland. — CYELS 2019 ■ Kellerbauer, Μ., Klamert, Μ. et al. (ed). The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Oxford University Press 2019. ■ Kelly, E. „Curiouser and curiouser“. Direct Effect and Fundamental Rights: The Decision of the European Court of Justice in Werner Mangold v Rudiger Helm. — CSLR 2006/1 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa Inimõiguste Konventsiooni tõlgendamisest. — Juridica 1994/4 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa Liitja õigus. Oiguskirjastus 2000 ■ Kerikmäe,T. Euroopa ühenduse õiguse ülimuslikkuse doktriin — arengud ja vastuolud. — Juridica 1998/4 ■ Kerikmäe, T. Rahvusvaheline tavaõigus. — Juridica 1998/1 • Kerikmäe,T., Nyman-Metcalf, K. Karlsruhe vs. Lissabon: kas põhiseadusliku dialoogi avamäng? -Juridica 2009/9 ■ Kilbey, I.The Interpretation of Article 260TFEU (ex 228 EC). — ELR 2010/3 ■ Kilpatrick, C., NovitZjT. et al. (ed).The Future of Remedies in Europe. Hart Publishing 2000, ■ Kiviorg, Μ., Land, K. jt. Rahvusvaheline õigus. 4. trükk. Juura 2010 ■ Klabbers, J. Informal Instruments Before the European Court of Justice. — CMLR 1994/5 ■ Klabbers, J. International Law in Community Law: The Law and Politics of Direct Effect. —YEL 2001 ■ Klabbers, J. The Redundancy of Soft Law. — NJIL 1996/2 ■ Klages, R. ECJ Reverses its Case Law on Procedural Effects of a Detailed Opinion. — EU Focus 2001/80 ■ Klamert, Μ. Dark Matter: Competence, Jurisdiction and „The Area Largely Covered by EU Law“ - Comment on Lesoochranarske. — ELR 2012/3 ■ Klamert, Μ. Judicial Implementation of
Directives and Anticipatory Indirect Effect: Connecting the Dots. - CMLR 2006/S " Kochenov, D. On Policing Article 2 TEU Compliance — Reverse Solange and Systemic Infringements Analyzed. — PYIL 2013 ■ Kochenov, D. (ed). EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights. Cambridge University Press 2017 ■ Kokott, J., Sobotta, C. Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union: On the Relationship between EU Fundamental Rights, the European Convention and National Standards of Protection. —YEL 2015 • Kolk, T. Tõhus ja õiglane menetlus õigusakti põhiseadusvastasuse nõude lahendamisel. — Juridica 2012/10 ■ Komárek, J. Inter-Court Constitutional Dialogue After the Enlargement — Implications of the Case of Professor Köbler. — CYELP 2005 ■ Komárek, J. Playing with Matches:The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgement of the Court of Justice of the EU ultra vires. — ECLR 2012/2 ■ Komárek, J. The Place of Constitutional Courts in the EU. — ECLR 2013/3 • Koolmeister, I. Poliitika ja õigus. — Juridica 2020/3 ■ Korkea-aho, E. EU Soft Law in Domestic Legal Systems: Flexibility and Diversity Guaranteed? 493
Kasutatud kirjandus - MJECL 2009/3 ■ Korkea-aho, E. National Courts and European Soft Law: Is Grimaldi Still Good Law? —YEL 2018 ■ Korkea-aho, E. Watering Down the Court of Justice? The Dynamics between Network Implementation and Article 2S8TFEU Litigation. — ELJ 2013/5 ■ Koskenniemi, Μ. (ed). International Law Aspects of European Union. Martinus Nijhoff 1997 ■ Koutrakos, P. EU International Relations Law. Hart Publishing 2006 ■ Koutrakos, P. Judicial Review in the EU’s Cmmon Foreign and Security Policy. — ICLQ 2018/1 ■ Kovács, К. The Rise of an Ethnocultural Constitutional Identity in the Jurisprudence of the East Central European Courts. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Král, R. On the Choice of Methods ofTransposition of EU Directives. — ELR 2016/2 • Král, R., Mádr, P. On the (In)applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to National Measures Exceeding the Requirements of Minimum Harmonisation Directives. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Krisch, N. Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralist Structure of Postnationalist Law. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Krommendijk, J. „Open Sesame!“: Improving Access to the ECJ by Requiring National Courts to Reason Their Refusals to Refer. — ELR 2017/1 ■ Krommendijk, J. Wide Open and Unguarded Stand our Gates: The CJEU and References for a Preliminary Ruling in Purely Internal Situations. — GLJ 2017/6 ■ Kull, I. Võlaõiguse arengud kohtupraktikas. — Juridica 1999/6 ■ Kumm, Μ. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe Before and After the Constitutional Treaty. — ELJ 2005/3 • Kumm, Μ. Who is the Final Arbiter of
Constitutionality in Europe? Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. ֊ CMLR 1999/2 ■ Kumm, Μ., Ferreres Comella, V.The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union. — IJCL 2005/2-3 L ■ Lacchi, C. Review by Constitutional Courts of the Obligation of National Courts of Last Instance to Refer a Preliminary Question to the Court of Justice of the EU. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Lackhoff, К., Nyssens, H. Direct Effect of Directives in Triangular Situations. — ELR 1998/5 ■ Laffranque, J. Eesti põhiseaduse ja Euroopa õiguse kooselu. — Juridica 2003/3 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liidu Nobeli auhind. — Juridica 2015/2 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liidu õigussüsteem ja Eesti õiguse koht selles. Juura 2006 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa Liit ja Euroopa Ühendus. Institutsioonid ja õigus. Sisekaitseakadeemia kirjastus 1999 ■ Laffranque, J. Euroopa põhiseaduse lepingu peied Tallinnas. Mis saab edasi? — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Laffranque, J. Kas ühinev Euroopa vajab ühtset konstitutsiooni? — Juridica 2000/7 ■ Laffranque, J. Lojaalsuse põhimõte Euroopa Liidus ja selle mõju Eestile. — Juridica 2001 /9 ■ Laffranque, J. Pilk Eesti õigusmaastikule põhiseaduse täiendamise seaduse valguses. Euroopa 494
Kasutatud kirjandus Liidu õigusega seotud võtmeküsimused põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalves. — Juridica 2007/8 ■ Laffranque, J. Põhiseadus läbi inimõigustealase Euroopa kohtupraktika prisma. — Juridica 2021/1 ■ Laffranque, J. Sõltumatu ja demokraatlik õigusriik Riigikohtu praktikas. Eesti Euroopa Liidu liikmesuse kontekstis. — Juridica 2009/8 ■ Laffranque, J. Who Has the Last Word on the Protection of Human Rights in Europe? — Juridica International 2012/19 ■ Laffranque, J., Madise, IL jt. Põhiseaduse täiendamise seaduse eelnõust. — Juridica 2002/8 ■ Laffranque, R. EL/EU lepingute konstitutsionaliseerimise protsess ja liikmesriikide suveräänsus. Dilemma Prantsuse õiguse vaatepunktist nähtuna. — Juridica 2000/8 ' Lagoutte, S., Gammeltoft-Hansen,T. et al. (ed).Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights. Oxford University Press 2016 ■ Láncos, P. L. The Power of Soft Law: Spontaneous Approximation of Fining Policies for Anti competitive Conduct. Part 1. — ECompLR 2019/11 ■ Land, K. Euroopa ühendused — supranatsionaalne organisatsioon. — Juridica 1997/9 ■ Lang, Μ. Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ. — Intertax 2007/4 ■ Lasok, D., Bridge, J. W. Law and Institutions of the European Communities. Sth Edition. Lexis Law Pub 1991 ■ Lasser, Μ. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press 2004 ' Laulhé Shaelou, S., Karatzia, A. Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Cyprus Bail-in Litigation: a Commentary on Mallis and Ledra. — ELR 2018/2 • Laurand, A. Bosphoruse doktriin ja Euroopa Liidu liitumine Euroopa
inimõiguste konventsiooniga. — Juridica 2012/4 • Laurand, A. Euroopa Liidu liitumine inimõiguste ja põhivabaduste kaitse konventsiooniga. — Juridica 2013/9 ■ Lavranos, N. The ECJ’s Judgments in Melloni and Åkerberg Fransson: Une ménage à trois difficulté. — ELRep 2014/4 ■ Le Sueur, A., Sunkin, Μ. et al. Public Law:Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press 2013 ■ Leenen, A. Gemeenschapsrecht en volkenrecht: Een studie naar de draagwijdte van de eigen rechtsorde van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Kluwer 1984 ■ Lefevre, S. The Interpretation of Community Law by the Court of Justice in Areas of National Competence. — ELR 2004/4 ■ Lehis, L. Maksuõiguse üldpõhimõtted. — Juridica 1999/5 ■ Lenaerts, К. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Protection of Fundamental Rights. - PYIL 2011 ■ Lenaerts, K.The European Court of Justice and Process-Oriented Review. —YEL 2012 ■ Lenaerts, K.The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union. - CMLR 2007/6 ■ Lenaerts, K. Upholding the Rule of Law Through Judicial Dialogue. —YEL 2019 ■ Lenaerts, K., Corthaut,T. Of Birds and Hedges:The Role of Primacy in Invoking Norms of EU Law. - ELR 2006/3 495
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Lenaerts, K., Desomer, Μ. Bricks for a Constitutional Treaty of the European Union: Values, Objectives and Means. — ELR 2002/4 ■ Lenaerts, K., Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. The Constitutional Allocation of Powers and General Principles of EU Law. — CMLR 2010/6 ■ Lenaerts, K., Gutman, K. „Federal Common Law” in the European Union: A Comparative Perspective from the United States. — AJCL 2006/1 ■ Lenaerts, K., Maselis, I. et al. EU Procedural Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press 2014 • Lenaerts, K.,Van Nuffel, P. Constitutional Law of the European Union. 2nd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 200S ■ Lenaerts, K.,Van Nuffel, P. European Union Law. 3rd Edition. Sweet Maxwell 2011 ■ Lenz, Μ.,Tynes, D. et al. Horizontal What? Back to Basics. — ELR 2000/5 ■ Leppik, Μ. Esimesi märke põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulikust järelevalvest: Riigikohtu praktika 1920. aasta põhiseaduse kehtimisajal. — Juridica 2012/3 “ Lüsberg, J. В. Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? — CMLR 2001/5 ■ Lindeboom, J. Is the Primacy of EU Law Based on the Equality of the Member States? A Comment on the CJEU’s Press Release Following the PSPP Judgment. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Lindma, T. Lepingute suhtes kohaldatava seaduse küsimusi Euroopa Liidus ja Eestis. — Juridica 1996/6 ■ Linntam, Μ. Pädevuse jaotus Euroopa Liidu ja liikmesriikide vahel: kas paindlik jäikus või jäik paindlikkus? — Juridica 2005/1 ■ Linntam, Μ. Õigluse idee kui argument Eesti Vabariigi Riigikohtus ja Euroopa Kohtus. — Juridica 2002/1 • Lloyd, D. The Idea of Law. Penguin Books 1964 ■ Lock,T. EU Accession
to the ECHR: Implications for the Judicial Review in Strasbourg. — ELR 2010/6 ■ Lonardo, L. Republic of Slovenia v Republic of Croatia (C-457/18): „Am I My Brother’s Keeper?“ International Agreements by Member States and the Limits of the European Court of Justice’s Jurisdiction. — ELR 2021/1 ■ Looijestijn-Clearie, A. Breaking Up is Hard To Do: Dutch Unbundling Legislation and the Free Movement of Capital. — EBOLR 2014/3 ■ Lott, A. Euroopa Liidu arengusuunad ja Eesti põhiseadus. — Juridica 2013/1 ■ Lott, A. Süvendatud majandus- ja rahandusliidu rajamine: mõju põhiõiguste kaitsele ning põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtetele. — Juridica 2013/8 ■ Luts, Μ. Õigusnormide tõlgendamise meetoditest ja teooriatest. — Juridica 1998/3 ■ Lõhmus, U. Euroopa Liidu õigussüsteem ja põhiseaduslikkuse kontroll pärast 1. maid 2004. — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Lõhmus, U. Kuidas liikmesriigi kohtusüsteem tagab Euroopa Liidu õiguse tõhusa toime? — Juridica 2007/3 ■ Lõhmus, U. Mida teha põhiseadusega? — Juridica 2005 /2 ■ Lõhmus, U. Ne bis in idem põhimõte Euroopa Liidu õiguses. — Juridica 2009/9 ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiseaduse muutmine ja muutused põhiseaduses. — Juridica 2011/1 496
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiõigused ja Euroopa Liidu õiguse üldpõhimõtted: funktsioonid, kohaldamisala ja mõju. — Juridica 2011/9 ■ Lõhmus, U. Põhiõiguste kaitse kolmnurgas riik — Euroopa Nõukogu — Euroopa Liit. — Juridica 2010/S ■ Lõhmus, U. Rahvusvahelise õiguse üldtunnustatud põhimõtted Eesti õigussüsteemi osana. — Juridica 1999/9 ■ Lübbe-Wolff, G. Who Has the Last Word? National and Transnational Courts — Condict and Cooperation. - YEL 2011 Μ ■ Maasikas, Μ. Ankur või kompass. Euroopa Liit kriisiolukorras. — RiTo 2020/41 ■ MacCormick, N. Beyond the Sovereign State. — MLR 1993/1 • MacCormick (ed), N. Constructing Legal Systems: „European Union“ in Legal Theory. Springer 1997 ■ Maciejewski, T., Theilen, J. T. Temporal Aspects of the Interaction Between National Law and EU law: Reintroducing the Protection of Legitimate Expectations. — ELR 2017/2 ■ Madise, L. Rahvusvahelise õiguse käsitlusest 1992. aasta Eesti põhiseaduses. — Juridica 1998/7 ■ Madise, íl. Õigusalaste kirjatööde selgusest ja kergusest. — Juridica 2019/6 ■ Madise, U. jt (toim). Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Neljas, parandatud ja täiendatud väljaanne. Juura 2017 • Madise, U., Kalmo, H. et al. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Viies, parandatud ja täiendatud väljänne. Juura 2020. ■ Magliveras, K. Best intentions but empty words: the European Ombudsman. — ELR 199S/4 ■ Mailend, A. Direktiivide vahetu õigusmõju: Euroopa kohtupraktika ebaselge éclairé. — Juridica 1995/2 ■ Maimann, К. Integratsiooniõiguse põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulik järelevalve Eestis. — Juridica
2006/6 ■ Malcolm, H. What is a Preliminary Reference? And Why Should I Care? — ArchR 2015/9 ■ Maltby, N. Marleasing : What Is All the Fuss About? — LQR 1993/109 ■ Mancini, G. F. (ed). Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union. Collected Essays. Hart Publishing 2000 • Mancini, G. F., Keeling, D.T. Democracy and the European Court of Justice. — MLR 1994/2 • Marguery, T. The Protection of Fundamental Rights in European Criminal Law after Lisbon: What Role for the Charter of Fundamental Rights? — ELR 2012/4 • Markakis, Μ. Accountability in the Economic and Monetary Union: Foundations, Policy, and Governance. Oxford University Press 2020 ■ Markesinis, B. S. (ed).The Clifford Chance Lectures. Volume 1: Bridging the Channel. Oxford University Press 1996 ■ Marsden, S. Invoking Direct Application and Effect of International Treaties by the European Court of Justice: Implications for International Environmental Law in the European Union. — 497
Kasutatud kirjandus ICLQ 201 ï /3 ■ Martens, S. Methodenlehre des Unionsrechts. Mohr Siebeck 2013 ■ Martin, S. (ed). The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël. Springer Science+Business Media 1994 ■ Martin Rodriguez, P. Crónica De Una Muerte Anunciada: Comentario A La Sentencia Del Tribunal De Justicia (Gran Sala), de 26 de Febrero de 2013, Stefano Melloni, C-399/11. — RGDE 2013/30 ■ Martines, F. Direct Effect of International Agreements of the European Union. — EJIL 2014/1 ■ Martinico, G. Is the European Convention Going to Be „Supreme”? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts. — EJIL 2012/2 ■ Martinico, G. The „Polemical“ Spirit of European Constitutional Law: On the Importance of Conflicts in EU Law. — GLJ 201S/6 ■ Maruste, R. Eesti omariikluse põhidokumendid. Eelkonstitutsioonilised aktid ja põhiseadused koos lühikommentaaridega. Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia riigiõiguse sihtkapital 2020 ■ Maruste, R. Ettekanne Põhiseaduse viienda aastapäeva konverentsil. — Juridica 1997/9 ■ Maruste, R. Konstitutsionalism ning põhiõiguste ja -vabaduste kaitse. Juura 2014 ■ Maruste, R. Mis oli, on ja võiks olla põhiseaduslikkuse kohtulikus järelevalves. — Juridica 2020/6 ■ Maruste, R. Põhiseaduse tõlgendamise meetodid. — Juridica 1996/2 ■ Maruste, R. Põhiseadust tuleks siiski muuta. — Postimees 29.01.2002 ' Maruste, R. Rahvusvahelise kohtu otsuse siseriiklikust täitmisest. — Juridica 2003/9 ■ Maruste, R, Albi, A. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus Euroopa Liidu õiguskorras. — Juridica 2003 /1 ■ Mason, P. Is European Law „Always Speaking“? —VAT
Digest 2011/84 ■ Mastroianni, R. On the Distinction BetweenVertical and Horizontal Direct Effects of Community Directives: What Role for the Principle of Equality? — EPL 1999/3 ■ Mataija, Μ. Internal Situations in Community Law: An Uncertain Safeguard of Competences Within the Internal Market. — CYELP 2009 ■ Mayer, F. C. Rebels Without a Cause? A Critical Analysis of the German Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference. - GLJ 2014/2 ■ Mayer, F. C. Supremacy — Lost? — Comment on Roman Kwiecień. — GLJ 2005/11 ■ Mayer, F. C.The Ultra Vires Ruling: Deconstructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP Decision of 5 May 2020. ֊ ECLR 2020/4 ■ Mayer, F. C.To Boldly Go Where No Court Has Gone Before.The German Federal Constitutional Court’s ultra vires Decision of May 5, 2020. — GLJ 2020/5 • McLeod, I. Literal and Purposive Techniques of Legislative Interpretation: Some European Community and English Common Law Perspectives. — BJIL 2004/3 ■ Mendelson, Μ. The Formation of Customary International Law. Martinus Nijhoff 1999 ■ Mendez, Μ. The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques. — EJIL 2010/1 ■ Merusk, K. Administratsiooni diskretsioon. — Juridica 1998/3 * Merusk, K. Menetlusosaliste õigused haldusmenetluse seaduses. — Juridica 2001/8 ■ Miasik, D., Szwarc, Μ. Effectiveness of EU Directives in National Courts — Judicial Dialogue 498
Kasutatud kirjandus Continues: The Court of Justice’s Judgment in C-54S/17 Pawlak. — PYIL 2019 ■ Micklitz, H.-W., de Witte, B. (ed). The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States. Intersentia 2012 ■ Mikli, S. Kui kauge Euroopa Liidu õigus saab järsku igapäevatöö osaks: probleeme Euroopa Liidu õiguse ülevõtmisel ja rakendamisel õiguskindluse põhimõtte kontekstis. — Juridica 201S / 2 ■ Millet, F.-X. L’Union européenne et l’identité constitutionnelle des États members. LGDJ 2013 • Millett, T. Rules of Interpretation of EEC Legislation. SLR 1989/3 ■ Mitsilegas, V. Judicial Concepts of Trust in Europe’s Multi-Level Security Governance: From Melloni to Schrems via Opinion 2 /13. — Eucrim 201S / 3 ■ Moore, S., Lewis, C. Duties, Directives and Damages in European Community law. — Public Law 1993/Spring ■ Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th Edition. Alfred A. Knopf 1971 ■ Mugur, Μ., Ginter, C. Euroopa liidu õiguse põhimõtetest tulenevad piirangud seadusandja valikuvabadusele. — Juridica 2010/4 ■ Murphy, C. C. Using the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Against Private Parties after Association De Médiation Sociale. — EHRLR 2014/2 ■ Mälksoo, L. Kuidas muuta põhiseadust? — Postimees 13.0S.2002 ■ Möllers, C., Schneider, L. Demokratiesicherung in der Europäischen Union. Mohr Siebeck 2018 N ■ Narits, R. Eesti põhiseaduse aluspõhimõtted omariikluse garantiina. — Juridica 2011/1 ■ Narits, R. Kohtupretsedendist. — Juridica 1995/9 ■ Narits, R.Tõlgendamine: teadus või seadus? — Juridica 1994/9 ■ Narits, R. Õiguse entsüklopeedia.
Juura 2007 ■ Nebbia, P. Do the Rules on State Aids Have a Life ofTheir Own? National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness in the Lucchini Case. — ELR 2008/3 ■ Neergaard, U., Jacqueson, C. (ed). Proceedings: Speeches from the XXVI FIDE Congress.The XXVI FIDE Congress in Copenhagen 2014. Congress publication. DJ0F Publishing 2014 ■ Neergaard, U., Nielsen, R. et al. (ed). European Legal Method: Paradoxes and Revitalisation. DJ0F Publishing 2011 ■ Neergaard, U., Sørensen, К. E. Activist Infighting Among Courts and Breakdown of Mutual Trust? The Danish Supreme Court, the CJEU, and the Ajos Case. —YEL 2017 ■ Negishi, Y. The Pro Hornine Principle’s Role in Regulating the Relationship between Conventionality Control and Constitutionality Control. — EJIL 2017/2 • Newman, A., Bach, D. The European Union as Hardening Agent: Soft Law and the Diffusion of Global Financial Regulation. — JEPP 2014/3 ■ Nicol, D. Disapplying With Relish?The Industrial Tribunals and Acts of Parliament. — Public Law 1996/4 ■ Nicolaidis, K., Howse, R. (ed).The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford University Press 2001 499
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Nollkaemper, A. The Duality of Direct Effect of International Law. EJ1L 2 015 /1 • Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Macmillan 1994 • Nyikos, S. A. Strategic Interaction Among Courts Within the Preliminary Reference Process — Stage 1 : National Court Preemptive Opinions. — EJPR 2006/4 ■ Nyman-Metcalf, K. Mõningad vaatekohad Euroopa õiguse ja põhiseaduse vahekorrale. Kas Euroopa Liit on riik? — Juridica 2010/S О ■ О ’ Keeffe, D. Is the Spirit ofArticle 177 Under Attack? Preliminary References and Admissibility. -ELR 1998/6 ■ O’Keefe, D., Bavasso, A. (ed). Judicial Review in European Union Law. Volume I. Kluwer Law International 2000 ■ Olmos Giupponi, B. International Law and Sources of Law in MERCOSUR: An Analysis of a 20-Year Relationship. — LJIL 2012/3 ■ Olsson, LA. Four Competing Approaches to International Soft Law. — SSL 2013/58 ■ Onagoruwa, G. A. Legitimacy Deficit of Soft Law Institutions in Cross-Border Bank Regulation: an African Perspective. — JIBLR 2014/4 ■ Oras, Μ. Euroopa Ühenduse keskkonnadirektiivide vahetu kohaldatavus. — Juridica 2009/6 ■ Orgad, L.The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation. — IJCL 2010/4 ■ Ost, E, van de Kerchove, Μ. De la pyramide au réseau. Pour mie théorie dialectique du droit. F.U.S.L. 2002 ■ O’Higgins,T. F., Curtin, D. et al. (ed). Constitutional Adjudication in European Community and National Law: Essays for the Hon. Mr. JusticeT.F. O’Higgins. Butterworth 1992 ■ O’Leary, S. Courts, Charters and Conventions: Making Sense of Fundamental Rights in the EU. — Irish Jurist 2016/56 ■
O’Sullivan, C. E. Ireland’s Non-Compliance with the Principle of Supremacy and the Definition of „Court or Tribunal“ for the Purposes of Article 267TFEU: A Review of the Recent Case Law. - Irish Jurist 2019/61 P ■ Pabsch, E. Euroopa Integratsioon.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 1999 ■ Palu, G. Euroopa Liidu ülimuslikkuse tagajärjel tekkinud pöörddiskrimineerimine siseriiklikus õiguskorras. Magistritöö, Tartu Ülikool 2020 ■ Papadopoulos, T. Criticising the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality. -EHRLR 2011/4 " Parind, Μ., Simovart, Μ. A. Vestlusring „Riigihankeõigus eile, täna ja homme. Müüdid ja tegelikkus“. — Juridica 2019/6 ■ Parrest, N. Hea halduse põhimõte Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartas. — Juridica 2006/1 ■ Paul, T. Teispool vaikust. Mõned hommikused meditatsioonid. Johannes Esto Ühing 2012 soo
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Peep,V. (toim). Põhiseadus ja Põhiseaduse Assamblee. Koguteos. Juura 1997 ■ Peers, S. Supremacy, Equality and Human Rights: Comment on Kücükdeveci (C-55S/O7). — ELR 2010/6 ■ Peers, S. Towards a New Form of EU Law? The Use of EU Institutions Outside the EU Legal Framework. — ECLR 2013/1 ■ Peers, S., Costa, Μ. The Old Dog Learns New Tricks: Reinvigorating Infringement Proceedings to Enhance the Effectiveness of EU Law. — ELR 2021/2 ■ Peers, S., Hervey, T. et al. (ed). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Bloomsbury Publishing 2014 • Pekkanen, R. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni tõlgendamise põhimõtted. — Juridica 2000/ 3 Perju,V. Against Bidimensional Supremacy in EU Constitutionalism. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ ■ Pernice, I. Integrating the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Constitution of the European Union: Practical and Theoretical Propositions. — CJEL 2003/5 ■ Pernice, I. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. — ECLR 2015/3 ■ Pernice, I. Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union. — ELR 2002/5 • Pernice, I. The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of the European Union. 2002 Kättesaadav:https://ec.europa.eu/dorie/fileDownload.do;jsessionid=lZpXVhSJYQSlXlXJlYFpCgBYT6cy7Xs3T6SGx0x MT322xKYSHbg8!1782169932?docId=8616 cardId=8616 ■ Perocevic, K. European Union Legal Nature: EU as sui generis — a Platybus-like Society. — InterEULawEast 2017/2 ■ Pertek, J. New Needs for Education and Training on European Law. ֊ ELR 1993/5 ■ Pescatore, P. Le recours, dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des
Communautés européennes, à des normes déduites de la comparaison des droits des Etats membres. — RIDC 1980/2 ■ Pescatore, P. The Doctrine of „Direct Effect“: An Infant Disease of Community Law. — ELR 2015/2 ■ Petersen, N. Karlsruhe’s Lochner Moment? A Rational Choice Perspective on the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Relationship to the CJEU After the PSPP Decision. — GLJ 2020/5 ' Piip, A. (autor), Pärna, P. (koost). Õiguse jõud. Ilmamaa 2007 • Pikamäe, P. Eesti võimalustest jääda ellu Euroopa Liidus. - Juridica 1995/8 • Pikamäe, P. Euroopa Ühenduste õiguskorrast. — Juridica 1996/5 ■ Pilving, I. Haldusakti tühistamine halduse poolt. — Juridica 1998/8 ■ Pilving, I. Halduse vastutuse kahju tekitamise eest. — Juridica 1998/6 ■ Pilving, L, Lapimaa, V. Annual meeting of administrative judges, Bealieu-sur-mer, March 10-11, 2006 Estonian report. Kättesaadav: https: / /www.aeaj .org/page/Annual-meeting-of-administrative-judges-Bealieusur-mer-March-10- 11 -2006-Estonian-report ■ Piris, J.-C.The Future of Europe: Towards aTwo-Speed EU? Cambridge University Press 2012 ■ Pisuke, H. Tõlkimine ja intellektuaalne omand: mõned seosed ja suundumused. — Juridica 2020/5 ■ Pizarroso Ceruti, A. The European Court of Justice: Legal Interpretation and the Dynamics of 501
Kasutatud kirjandus European Integration. — CJEL 2019/Spring ■ PK. Brexit and International Treaty-making. — ELR 2016/1 ■ PK. Is There More to Say About the Direct Effect of Directives? — ELR 2018/5 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Adjudicating Economics II: The Quantitative Easing Programme DeclaredValid. — ELR 2020/1 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Fundamental Rights and the New Battle over Legal and Judicial Supremacy: Lessons from Melloni. —YEL 2015 ■ Pliakos, A., Anagnostaras, G. Who is the Ultimate Arbiter? The Battle Over Judicial Supremacy in European Union Law. — ELR 2011/1 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ. Interpreting European Law — Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism. — EJLS 2007/1 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ. We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Poiares Maduro, Μ., Azoulai, L. (ed).The Past and Future of EU Law.The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Hart Publishing 2010 ■ Poli, S., Cisotta, R. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Exercise of Ultra Vires Review and the Possibility to Open an Infringement Action for the Commission. — CLJ 2020/5 ■ Pollicino, О. Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint. — GLJ 2004/3 ■ Pollicino, О. The New Relationship Between National and the European Courts After the Enlargement of Europe: Towards a Unitary Theory of Jurisprudential Supranational Law? —YEL 2010 ■ Polzin, Μ. Constitutional Identity as a Constructed Reality and a
Restless Soul. — GLJ 2017/7 ■ Pormeister, K. Uus isikuandmete kaitse seadus ja isikuandmed teaduses: kolm näidet probleemsest õigusloomest. — Juridica 2019/4 ■ Pozzo, P, Jacometti, V. (ed). Multilingualism and the Harmonisation of European Law. Kluwer Law International 2006 ■ Power, V. National Sovereignty is Alive and Well in the European Union: the Wightman Ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union. — Irish Jurist 2019/61 ■ Prêchai, S. Competence Creep and General Principles of Law. — REAL 2010/1 ■ Prechai, S. Directives in EC Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 2015 ■ Prêchai, S. Directives in European Community Law: A Study of Directives andTheir Enforcement in National Courts. Oxford University Press 1995 ■ Prêchai, S. Does Direct Effect Still Matter? — CMLR 2000/5 ■ Preuss, U. K. Migration — A Challenge to Modern Citizenship. — Constellations 1998/3 ■ Prinssen, J. Μ., Schrauwen, A. (ed). Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine. Europa Law Publishing 2002 ■ Põder, J.-C. Põhiseaduse preambul ja selle väärkasutus, ERR arvamusportaal 07.06.2020 ■ Pärnamägi, I., Inkinen, A. jt. Euroopa stabiilsusmehhanismi asutamislepingu artikli 4 lõike 4 kooskõla Eesti põhiseadusega. — Juridica 2012/5 502
Kasutatud kirjandus Q Quigley, C. EC Directives and Private Law Rights. — ICCLR 1997/11 ■ R ■ Ragolle, F. Access to Justice for Private Applicants in the Community Legal Order: Recent (R) evolutions. — ELR 2003/1 ' Raidla, J. Põhiseadus ja Eesti rahvuslikud huvid vs. Euroopa föderalism. — Juridica 2013/8 • Raig, I. Eesti tee Euroopa Liitu. Unistus paremast Euroopast. International University Audentes 2008 ■ Raitio, J. The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003 ■ Randma, P. Euroopa Ühenduse kriminaalõiguslikud põhimõtted. — Juridica 2000/5 Rask, M. Ühinemise otsustab rahvas. — Postimees 29.04.2002 Rasmussen, Μ. Revolutionizing European law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment. IJCL 2014/1 ■ Raud, К. Euroopa ühenduste kohtu otsuste kirjutamise vormist ja stiilist. — Juridica 1999/4 ■ Rawlings, R., Leyland, p. et ai. (ed). Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European and International Perspectives. Oxford University Press 2013 ■ Reestman, J.-H., Besselink, L. After Åkerberg Fransson and Melloni. — ECLR 2013/2 ■ Reich, N. A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Reviewed by Norbert Reich. — ELR 2012/4 ■ Reif, L. (ed).The International Ombudsman Anthology. Kluwer Law International 1999 ■ Reinsalu, U. Kas vajame uut põhiseadust? — Juridica 2005/3 ■ Reyns, C. Saving Judicial Independence: A Threat to the Preliminary Ruling Mechanism? — ECLR 2021/1 ■ Rinze, J. The Role of the European Court of Justice as a Federal Constitutional Court. — Public Law 1993/3 ■ Ritter, C. Purely Internal Situations, Reverse
Discrimination, Guimont, Dzodzi and Article 234. SSRN 2006. Kättesaadav: https://ssrn.com/abstract=954242 ■ Robin-Oliver, S. The Evolution of Direct Effect in the EU: Stocktaking, Problems, Projections. -IJCL 2014/1 “ Rodriguez, P. Μ. The Principle of Legal Certainty and the Limits to the Applicability of EU Law. -CDE 2016/1 ■ Rodriguez-Izquierdo Serrano, Μ. The Spanish Constitutional Court and Fundamental Rights Adjudication After the First Preliminary Reference. — GLJ 2015/6 ■ Rosas, A., Armati, L. EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction. Hart Publishing 2010 ■ Rosenfeld, Μ. (ed). Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference and Legitimacy. Theoretical Perspectives. Duke University Press 1994 ■ Rosenfeld, Μ., Sajó, A. (ed).The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press 2012 ■ Rosenne, S. Developments in the Law ofTreaties 1945—1986. Cambridge University Press 1989 503
Kasutatud kirjandus * Ross, Μ. Beyond Francovich. — MLR 1993/1 ■ Ross, Μ. Effectiveness in the European Lega! Order(s): Beyond Supremacy to Constitutional Proportionality? — ELR 2006/4 • Rossi, L. S. „Same Legal Value as the Treaties”? Rank, Primacy, and Direct Effects of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. — GLJ 2017/4 ■ Ruse-Kahn, H.The Role of Atypical Acts in EU External Trade and Intellectual Property Policy. — EJIL 2010/4 s ■ Saaremäel-Stoilov, K. Mõtteid Riigikohtu põhiseaduslikkuse järelevalve praktika võimalikest arengusuundadest. Sõnavõtt Eesti põhiseadusliku identiteedi kaitseks. — Juridica 2009/8 • Sabel, C. E, Zeitlin, J. (ed). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Sadi, U., Mair, S. Mutual Disempowerment: Case C-441 /14 Dansk Industri, Acting on Behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen and Case No. IS/2014 Dansk Industri (DI) Acting for Ajos A/S vThe Estate Left by A. — ECLR 2017/2 ■ Sadurski, W. European Constitutsional Identity? — Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 06/37 ■ Sáiz Arnaiz, A., Alcoberro Liivinä, C. (ed). National Constitutional Identity and European Integration. Intersentia 2013 ■ Sarapuu, Μ. Kontroll võimu teostavate ametnike üle. — Juridica 1997/4 • Sarapuu, Μ. Ombudsmani arengust kaasaegseks institutsiooniks. — Juridica 1997/6 • Sarmiento, D. Who’s Afraid of the Charter?The Court of Justice, National Courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe. — CMLR 2013/5 • Sauter, W. Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act? — CYELS 2013 ■
Schachter, O. International Law in Theory and Practice. Springer 1991 ■ Schasmin, P., Ginter, C. Euroopa Liidu õigusest tulenevad võimalused jõustunud kohtuotsuste ja haldusaktide uueks läbivaatamiseks. —Juridica 2015/3 ■ Scheingold, S. A. The Rule of Law in European Integration: the Path of the Schuman Plan. Yale University Press 1965 ■ Scheppele, K. L., Pech, P. What is Rule of Law Backsliding? — Verfassungsblog 02.03.2018 Kättesaadav: https://verfassungsblog.de/what֊is-rule-of-law-backsliding/ ■ Schiek, D. The ECJ Decision in Mangold: A Further Twist on Effects of Directives and Constitutional Relevance of Community Equality Legislation. — ILJ 2006/3 ■ Schoch, F. Haldusõiguse euroopastumine. — Juridica 2017/1 ■ Schorkopf, F. Value Constitutionalism in the European Union. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Schroeder, W. (ed). Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe: From a Common Concept to Mechanisms of Implementation. Hart Publishing 2016 ' Schwensfeier, R.TheTWD Principle Post-Lisbon. — ELR 2012/2 ■ Schutz, H.-J., Bruha,T. et al. Casebook Europarecht. C. H. Beck 2004 ■ Schütze, R. European Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press 2012 504
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Scott, H., Barber, N. State Liability under Francovich for Decisions of National Courts. — LQR 2004/120 ■ Scott, J. In Legal Limbo: Post-Legislative Guidance as a Challenge for European Administrative Law. - CMLR 2011/2 ■ Sein, S., Mikiver, Μ. jt. Pilguheit andmekaitsesubjekti õiguskaitsevahenditele uues isikuandmete kaitse üldmääruses. — Juridica 2018/2 • Selvik, G., Clifton, M.-J. et al. (ed). The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Springer 2019 • Senden, L. Soft Law and Its Implications for Institutional Balance in the EC. — ULR 2OOS/2 " Senden, L. Soft Law in European Community Law. Hart Publishing 2004 • Senden, L. Soft Post-Legislative Rulemaking: ATime for More Stringent Control. — ELJ 2012/1 ■ Senden, L., van der Brink, A. Check and Balances of Soft EU Rule-Making. European Parliament 2012 • Shapiro, Μ.The European Court of Justice: Of Institutions and Democracy. —ILR 1998/1 “ Shaw, Μ. N. International Law. 6th Edition. Cambridge Universtity Press 2008 ■ Shelton, D. Normative Hierarchy in International Law. — AJIL 2017/2 ■ Shelton, D. (ed). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford University Press 2000 • Sillaots, Μ. Kohtuniku vabadusest seadusenormi mõtte avamisel. — Juridica 1998/1 ■ Sillaots, Μ. Riigikohtu lahend Eesti kriminaalmenetlusõiguse allikana. — Juridica 2001 / 2 • Simon, D. La Directive Européenne. Dalloz 1997 ■ Simon, S., Rathke, Η. „Simply Not Comprehensible .”Why? — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Simovart, Μ. A., Härginen, К. Implementation of EU Public
Procurement Law in Estonia — History Revisited. — PPLR 2019/5 ■ Simovart, Μ. A., Parind, Μ. (koost). Riigihangete seadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Juura 2019 ■ Sirg, K. Otsese Õigusmõju doktriin. Selle kohaldamine keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi sätetele. — Juridica 2001/9 ■ Slaughter, A.-Μ., Stone Sweet,A. et al. (ed).The European Court and National Courts. Doctrine Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Hart Publishing 1998 ■ Slynn, G. The Court of Justice of the European Communities. — ICLQ 1984/2 ■ Smith, Μ. Enforcement, Monitoring, Verification, Outsourcing: the Decline and Decline of the Infringement Process. — ELR 2008/ 6 ■ Smits, R. A National Measure Annulled by the European Court of Justice, or: High-level Judicial Protection for Independent Central Bankers. — ECLR 2020/1 ■ Snyder, F. The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques. — MLR 1993/1 ■ Sobotta, C. Transparenz in den Rechtssetzungsverfahren der Europäischen Union. Nomos 2001 ■ Société française pour le droit International. L’élaboration du droit international public: Colloque du Toulouse. Padone 1975 • Somsen, H., Seventer, H. et al. (ed). Yearbook of European Environmental Law. Oxford 505
Kasutatud kirjandus University Press 2002 ■ Sowery, K. The Nature and Scope of the Primary Law-making Powers of the European Union: the Member States as the “Masters of the Treaties?” — ELR 2018/2 ■ Spaventa, E. Opening Pandora’s Box: Some Reflections on the Constitutional Effects of the Decision in Pupino. — ECLR 2007/1 ■ Spieker, L. D. Breathing Life into the Union’s Common Values: On the Judicial Application of Article 2TEU in the EUValue Crisis. — GLJ 2019/8 ■ Squintani, L, Lindeboom, J. The Normative Impact of Invoking Directives: Casting Light on Direct Effect and the Elusive Distinction Between Obligations and Mere Adverse Repercussions. -YEL 2019 ■ Stamatoudi, L, Torremans, P. (ed). EU Copyright Law. A Commentary. Elgar Commentaries 2014 ■ Stefan, O. Hybridity Before the Court: A Hard Look at Soft Law in the EU Competition and State Aid Case Law. — ELR 2012/1 ■ Steiner, J. From Direct Effects to Francovich: Shifting Means of Enforcement of Community Law.-ELR 1993/1 ■ Steunenberg, В., Voermans, W. The Transposition of EC Directives: a Comparative Study of Instruments, Techniques and Processes in Six Member States. Wolf Legal Publishers 2006 • Stone, C. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Object. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press 2010 ■ Strumia, E, Kaushal, A. Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Imr /¿ration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada. — GLJ 2017/7 Š ■ Sipilov, V. Euroopa Liidu direktiivide vahetu kohaldatavus. — Juridica 2010/6 Z ■ Ziller, J. National Constitutional Concepts in the New Constitution for Europe:
Part 1. — ECLR 2005/2 • Ziółkowski, Μ., Grabowska-Moroz, B. Enforcement of EU Values and the Tyranny of National Identity ֊ Polish Examples and Excuses. — Verfassungsblog 26.11.2019. Kättesaadav: https: / / verfassungsblog.de/enforcement-of-eu-values-and-the-tyranny-ofnational-identity-polish-examples-and-excuses/ ■ Zonnekeyn, G. The Direct Effect of GATT in Community Law: From International Fruit Company to the Banana Cases. — ITLR 1996/2 S06
Kasutatud kirjandus T ■ Taborowski, Μ. Joined cases C-392/04 C-422/04: i-21 Germany GmbH (C-392/04), Arcor AG Co. KG (C-422/04), formerly ISIS Multimedia Net GmbH Co. KG. ֊ CMLR 2007/5 ■ Tallberg, J. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. — IO 2002/3 ■ Talvik, E. Legaalsuse põhimõte Eesti Vabariigi põhiseaduse tekkimises, muutmistes ja muutmiskavades. Tartu Ülikool 1991 • Taro, A. Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse rikkumisega tekitatud kahju. Ühenduse liikmesriigi vastutus. ֊Juridica 2003/3 ' Taska, A. Õigusteaduslikke mõtteid. Lund 1989 ■ Taylor, C (Hrsg). Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung. Fischer 1993 “ Terhechte, J. P. Judicial Accountability and Public Liability — The German „Judges Privilege“ Under the Influence of European and International Law. ֊ GLJ 2012/3 ■ Theodossiou, Μ. A. An Analysis of the Recent Response of the Community to Non Compliance with Court of Justice Judgments: Article 228(2) E.C. — ELR 2002/1 ■ Thomas, R., Lynch-Wood, G. Transposing European Union Law in the United Kingdom: Administrative Rule-making, Scrutiny and Better Regulation. — EPL 2008/2 ’ Thym, D. Separation versus Fusion — or: How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. ֊ ECLR 2013/3 ■ Thym, D. The Intergovernmental Constitution of the EU’s Foreign, Security and Defence Executive. — ECLR 2011/3 ■ Tomuschat, C. Saksa Liidukonstitutsioonikohus ja Euroopa õiguse ülimuslikkus. ֊ Juridica 2010/5 ■ Toomiste, Μ. Riigikohtu nõuandev funktsioon õigusloomes: kas
tõesti ise sööme, ise joome, ise nõud ka ära toome? — Juridica 2018/10 ■ Toomiste, Μ. Seisukoha küsimine Riigikohtult: kasutamata võimalus? Magistritöö,Tartu Ülikool 2017 ■ Toonen,T., Steunenberg, B. et a¡. Saying No to a European Constitution: Dutch Revolt, Enigma or Pragmatism? ֊ ZSEW 2006/4 ' Tornberg, N. The Commission’s Communications on the General Good ֊ Magna Carta or LawMaking? - EBLR 1999/1 -2 ■ Torres Perez, A. Constitutional Dialogue on the European Arrest Warrant: the Spanish Constitutional Court Knocking on Luxembourg’s Door. — ECLR 2012/1 ■ Torres Perez, A. Melloni in Three Acts: From Dialogue to Monologue. — ECLR 2014/2 • Trachtman, J. P. Bananas, Direct Effect and Compliance. — EJIL 1999/4 ' Treib, О., Bähr, H et al. Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. — JEPP 2007/1 ■ Treumer, S. Denmark as a Daredevil in ELI Public Procurement Law: Implementation of Directive 2014/24/EU. ֊ PPLR 2019/5 • Tridimas, T. Constitutional Review of Member State Action: The Virtues and Vices of an 507
Kasutatud kirjandus Incomplete Jurisdiction. ֊ IJCL 2011/3—4 ■ Tridimas, T. General Principles of EU Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press 2006 ■ Tridimas, T. Horizontal Effect of Directives: A Missed Opportunity. — ELR 1994/6 ■ Tridimas, T, Gari, G. Winners and Losers in Luxembourg: A Statistical Analysis of Judicial Review Before the European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance (2001-2005). — ELR 2010/2 ■ Tridimas,T., Lonardo, L.When Can a National Measure be Annulled by the ECJ? Case C-202/18 Ilmars Rimsevics v Republic of Latvia and Case C-238/18 European Central Bank v Republic of Latvia. — ELR 2020/5 ■ Triipan, Μ. Proportsionaalsuse põhimõte Euroopa Liidu õiguses. ■ Tsadiras, A. Maladministration and Life Beyond Legality:The European Ombudsman’s Paradigm. -IRL2015/3 ■ Tsadiras, A. Rules of Institutional “Flat-sharing”: The European Ombudsman and His National Peers.-ELR 2008/1 ■ Tsadiras, A. The European Ombudsman’s Remedial Powers: An Empirical Analysis in Context. -ELR 2013/1 ■ Tsadiras, A. The Position of the European Ombudsman in the Community System of Judicial Remedies. — ELR 2007/ 5 ■ TupitSjA. Kas võlakriis muudab Euroopa Liidu ja tema liikmesriikide padevusi? —Juridica 2012/1 Juridica 2006/3. U ■ Uustalu, H. Lissaboni leping — samm demokraatlikuma, efektiivsema ja läbipaistvama Euroopa poole. — Juridica 2008/5 V ■ Vahing, J. Euroopa ühenduste kohtu ja Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide kohtute ning Eesti kui võimaliku liikmesriigi kohtute vaheline koostöö. — Juridica 1998/5 ■ Vajda, C. Democracy in the European Union: what has the Court of Justice
to say? — CJICL 2015/2 ■ Vallikivi, H. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsiooni kasutamine Riigikohtu praktikas. — Juridica 2001/6 ■ Van Bockel, B., Wattéi, P. New Wine into Old Wineskins: The Scope of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU after Åkerberg Fransson. — ELR 2013/6 ■ Van Calster, G.The EU’sTower of Babel —The Interpretation by the European Court of Justice of Equally Authentic Texts Drafted in More Than One Official Language. —YEL 1997 ■ Van den Bossche, A.-Μ. Private Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and Article 19(1) TEU: Two’s Company,Three’s a Crowd. —YEL 2014 ■ Van der Schyff, G. The Constitutional Relationship Between the European Union and its Member States: the Role of National Identity in Article 4(2)TEU. — ELR 2012/5 S08
Kasutatud kirjandus ■ Van Elsuwege, P., Gremmelprez, F. Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the European Court of Justice. — ECLR 2020/1 ■ Van Elsuwege, P., Petrov, R. (ed). Legislative Approximation and Application of EU Law in the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union: Towards a Common Regulatory Space? Routledge 2014 ■ Van Middelaar, L. Teekond Euroopasse. Kuidas kontinendist sai liit. Eesti Maailmavaate Sihtasutus 2009 ■ Van Rossen, J. W. Interaction Between EU Law and International Law in the Light of Intertanko and Kadi: The Dilemma of Norms Bindings the Member States but not the Community. — NYIL 2009 ■ VanVooren, B. A Case-Study of„Soft Law”in EU External Relations: the European Neighbourhood Policy. ELR 2009 /S ■ Vene, E. Avaliku halduse kandja tekitatud kahju hüvitamine. Kohtupraktika ja riigivastutusõigus de legeferenda. — Juridica 2000/S ■ Verstraelen, S.The Temporal Limitation of Judicial Decisions:The Need for Flexibility Versus the Quest for Uniformity. — GLJ 2013/9 ■ Ver vaele, J. The European Arrest Warrant and Applicable Standards of Fundamental Rights in the EU.-REAL 2013/2 ■ Vesterdorf, B. A Constitutional Court for the EU? ֊֊ IJCL 2006/4 ■ Vianello, I. Upholding a Principled Approach to the Use of EU Administrative Activities Externally: What Role for the Court of Justice of the European Union? —YEL 2018 ■ Vilms, К. Demokraatia printsiip Euroopa Ühenduse õiguse printsiibina. — Juridica 2001 / S ■ Violante,T. Bring Back the Politics:The PSPP Ruling in Its Institutional Context. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Vogiatzis, N.
Exploring the European Council’s Legal Accountability: Court of Justice and European Ombudsman. — GLJ 2013/9 ■ Vogiatzis, N. The European Ombudsman and Good Administration in the European Union. Palgrave McMillan 2018 ■ Vogt, Μ. Indirect Judicial Protection in EC Law —the Case of the Plea of Illegality — ELR 2006/3 ■ Von Bogdandy, A.The European Union as a Human Rights Organization? Human Rights and the Core of the European Union. — CLMR 2000/6 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Bast, J. (ed). Principles of European Constitutional Law. Revised 2nd Edition. Hart, С. H. Beck, Nomos 2011 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Cruz Villalón, P. et al. (Hrsg). Handbuch lus Publicum Europaeum. Band II: Offene Staatlichkeit — Wissenschaft vom Verfassungsrecht. Müller Verlag 2008 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Schill, S. Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity Under the Lisbon Treaty. — CMLR 2011/5 ■ Von Bogdandy, A., Spieker, L. D. Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Article 2 TEU Values, Reverse Solange, and the Responsibilities of National Judges. — ECLR 2019/3 ■ Von Papp, K. A Federal Question Doctrine for EU Fundamental Rights Law: Making Sense of Articles 51 and 53 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. —ELR 2018/4 S09
Kasutatud kirjandus W ■ Wahl, N., Prete, L.The Gatekeepers of Article 267TFEU: On Jurisdiction and Admissibility of References for Preliminary Rulings. — CMLR 2018/2 ■ Waldhoff, C. Recent Developments Relating to the Retroactive Effect of Decisions of the ECJ. -CMLR 2009/1 ■ Walker, N. (ed). Sovereignty in Transition. Hart Publishing 2003 ■ Walker, N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. — MLR 2002/3 ■ Ward, A. Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You: Willy Kempter and the Duty to Raise EC Law in National Litigation. - ELR 2008/5 ■ Weatherill, S., Beaumont, P. EU Law. 3rd Edition. Penguin Books 1999 ■ Weil, P.Towards Relative Normativity in International Law? ֊AJIL 1983/3 ■ Weiler, J. A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors. — CPS 1994/4 ■ Weiler, J. The Community System: the Dual Character of Supranationalism. —YEL 1981 ■ Weiler, J., Lockhart, N. „Taking Rights Seriously“ Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence — Part II. — CMLR 1995/2 ■ Weiß, W. Human Rights in the EU: Rethinking the Role of the European Convention on Human Rights after Lisbon. — ECLR 2011/1 ■ Wellens, K. C., Borchardt, G. Μ. Soft Law in European Community Law. — ELR 1989/5 ■ Wendel, Μ. Exceeding Judicial Competence in the Name of Democracy: The German Federal Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference — ECLR 2014/2 ■ Wendel, Μ. Lisbon Before the Courts: Comparative Perspectives. — ECLR 2011/1 ■ Wendel, Μ. Paradoxes of Ultra-Vires Review: A Critical Review of the PSPP Decision and Its Initial Reception. — GLJ 2020/5 ■ Wildhaber, L.,
Diggelmann, O. Euroopa inimõiguste konventsioon ja eraelu kaitse. Uuemad arengusuunad. — Juridica 2007/1 ■ Willems, A.The Court of Justice of the European Union’s Mutual Trust Journey in EU Criminal Law: From a Presumption to (Room for) Rebuttal. — GLJ 2019/4 ■ Williams, G. Language and the Law. — LQR 1945/61 ■ Winter, J. A. Direct Applicability and Direct Effect, Two Distinct and Different Concepts in Community Law. - CMLR 1972/4 ■ Wouters, J., Nollkaemper, A. et al. (ed).The Europeanisation of International Law:The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States.T.M.C. Asser Press 2008, p 219 X • Xanthaki, H. Drafting Legislation. Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation. Hart Publishing 2014 510 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Parind, Mart |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1120623995 |
| author_facet | Parind, Mart |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Parind, Mart |
| author_variant | m p mp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048317081 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1355307314 (DE-599)BVBBV048317081 |
| era | Geschichte 2004-2021 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 2004-2021 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048317081</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221215</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220706s2022 xx |||| 00||| est d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789916410240</subfield><subfield code="9">978-9916-4-1024-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1355307314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048317081</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">est</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parind, Mart</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1120623995</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Euroopa Liidu õigus</subfield><subfield code="b">Eesti vaade</subfield><subfield code="c">Mart Parind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tallinn</subfield><subfield code="b">UKU</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">512 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2004-2021</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139924-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121346-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062174-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020342-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Estland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015587-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Estland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015587-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139924-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121346-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020342-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062174-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2004-2021</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20221215</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">4798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033696530</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Estland (DE-588)4015587-0 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Estland |
| id | DE-604.BV048317081 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T20:10:59Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:18:09Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789916410240 |
| language | Estonian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033696530 |
| oclc_num | 1355307314 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 512 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20221215 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | UKU |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Parind, Mart Verfasser (DE-588)1120623995 aut Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade Mart Parind Tallinn UKU 2022 512 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 2004-2021 gnd rswk-swf Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd rswk-swf Gericht (DE-588)4121346-4 gnd rswk-swf Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd rswk-swf Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd rswk-swf Gerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4020342-6 gnd rswk-swf Estland (DE-588)4015587-0 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Estland (DE-588)4015587-0 g Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 s Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 s Gericht (DE-588)4121346-4 s Gerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4020342-6 s Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 s Geschichte 2004-2021 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Parind, Mart Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd Gericht (DE-588)4121346-4 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd Gerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4020342-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4139924-9 (DE-588)4121346-4 (DE-588)4020682-8 (DE-588)4062174-1 (DE-588)4020342-6 (DE-588)4015587-0 |
| title | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade |
| title_auth | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade |
| title_exact_search | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade |
| title_full | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade Mart Parind |
| title_fullStr | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade Mart Parind |
| title_full_unstemmed | Euroopa Liidu õigus Eesti vaade Mart Parind |
| title_short | Euroopa Liidu õigus |
| title_sort | euroopa liidu oigus eesti vaade |
| title_sub | Eesti vaade |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd Gericht (DE-588)4121346-4 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd Gerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4020342-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Rechtssystem Gericht Gesetzgebung Urteil Gerichtsbarkeit Estland |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033696530&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT parindmart euroopaliiduoiguseestivaade |