Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality: Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence
This paper makes analytical, methodological and empirical contributions to the literature on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons, such as poverty rates and gross domestic product. The subject has recently generated much inter...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2015
|
Schriftenreihe: | World Bank E-Library Archive
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper makes analytical, methodological and empirical contributions to the literature on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons, such as poverty rates and gross domestic product. The subject has recently generated much interest in the wake of the release of the final results of the 2011 International Comparison Program. This paper introduces a preference-based analytical framework that departs from the conventional Balassa-Samuelson framework in deriving empirically verifiable propositions on the link between purchasing power parity and exchange rates, and between purchasing power parity and inequality. The paper also provides an alternative methodology for calculating purchasing power parities that are benchmarked against the 2011 International Comparison Program purchasing power parities. As this study shows, the alternative methodology is capable of easy implementation on readily available data sets. The benchmarking exercise suggests that the 2011 International Comparison Program generally understates purchasing power parity and overstates gross domestic product, and that the purchasing power parities vary across expenditure percentiles. The study reports regional variation in the direction of the difference between the two purchasing power parities. The empirical evidence is supportive of the positive association between inequality and purchasing power parity derived in the paper |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (57 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-7395 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048269774 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-7395 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010470379 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334039578 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010470379 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Majumder, Amita |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality |b Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |c Majumder, Amita |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (57 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a World Bank E-Library Archive | |
520 | |a This paper makes analytical, methodological and empirical contributions to the literature on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons, such as poverty rates and gross domestic product. The subject has recently generated much interest in the wake of the release of the final results of the 2011 International Comparison Program. This paper introduces a preference-based analytical framework that departs from the conventional Balassa-Samuelson framework in deriving empirically verifiable propositions on the link between purchasing power parity and exchange rates, and between purchasing power parity and inequality. The paper also provides an alternative methodology for calculating purchasing power parities that are benchmarked against the 2011 International Comparison Program purchasing power parities. As this study shows, the alternative methodology is capable of easy implementation on readily available data sets. The benchmarking exercise suggests that the 2011 International Comparison Program generally understates purchasing power parity and overstates gross domestic product, and that the purchasing power parities vary across expenditure percentiles. The study reports regional variation in the direction of the difference between the two purchasing power parities. The empirical evidence is supportive of the positive association between inequality and purchasing power parity derived in the paper | ||
700 | 1 | |a Ray, Ranjan |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Santra, Sattwik |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Majumder, Amita |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Majumder, Amita |t Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality: Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |d Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7395 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649969 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812671777982119936 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Majumder, Amita |
author_facet | Majumder, Amita |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Majumder, Amita |
author_variant | a m am |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048269774 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010470379 (OCoLC)1334039578 (DE-599)GBVNLM010470379 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-7395 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048269774</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-7395</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010470379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334039578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010470379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Majumder, Amita</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality</subfield><subfield code="b">Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence</subfield><subfield code="c">Majumder, Amita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (57 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank E-Library Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper makes analytical, methodological and empirical contributions to the literature on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons, such as poverty rates and gross domestic product. The subject has recently generated much interest in the wake of the release of the final results of the 2011 International Comparison Program. This paper introduces a preference-based analytical framework that departs from the conventional Balassa-Samuelson framework in deriving empirically verifiable propositions on the link between purchasing power parity and exchange rates, and between purchasing power parity and inequality. The paper also provides an alternative methodology for calculating purchasing power parities that are benchmarked against the 2011 International Comparison Program purchasing power parities. As this study shows, the alternative methodology is capable of easy implementation on readily available data sets. The benchmarking exercise suggests that the 2011 International Comparison Program generally understates purchasing power parity and overstates gross domestic product, and that the purchasing power parities vary across expenditure percentiles. The study reports regional variation in the direction of the difference between the two purchasing power parities. The empirical evidence is supportive of the positive association between inequality and purchasing power parity derived in the paper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ray, Ranjan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santra, Sattwik</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Majumder, Amita</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Majumder, Amita</subfield><subfield code="t">Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality: Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7395</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649969</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048269774 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T20:00:01Z |
indexdate | 2024-10-12T04:01:58Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649969 |
oclc_num | 1334039578 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (57 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | World Bank E-Library Archive |
spellingShingle | Majumder, Amita Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
title | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
title_auth | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
title_exact_search | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
title_exact_search_txtP | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
title_full | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence Majumder, Amita |
title_fullStr | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence Majumder, Amita |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence Majumder, Amita |
title_short | Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality |
title_sort | preferences purchasing power parity and inequality analytical framework propositions and empirical evidence |
title_sub | Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majumderamita preferencespurchasingpowerparityandinequalityanalyticalframeworkpropositionsandempiricalevidence AT rayranjan preferencespurchasingpowerparityandinequalityanalyticalframeworkpropositionsandempiricalevidence AT santrasattwik preferencespurchasingpowerparityandinequalityanalyticalframeworkpropositionsandempiricalevidence |