Can We Measure Resilience?: A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel
Although resilience has become a popular concept in studies of poverty and vulnerability, it has been difficult to obtain a credible measure of resilience. This difficulty is because the data required to measure resilience, which involves observing household outcomes over time after every exposure t...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2015
|
Schriftenreihe: | World Bank E-Library Archive
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Although resilience has become a popular concept in studies of poverty and vulnerability, it has been difficult to obtain a credible measure of resilience. This difficulty is because the data required to measure resilience, which involves observing household outcomes over time after every exposure to a shock, are usually unavailable in many contexts. This paper proposes a new method for measuring household resilience using readily available cross section data. Intuitively, a household is considered resilient if there is very little difference between the pre- and post-shock welfare. By obtaining counterfactual welfare for households before and after a shock, households are classified as chronically poor, non-resilient, and resilient. This method is applied to four countries in the Sahel. It is found that Niger, Burkina Faso, and Northern Nigeria have high percentages of chronically poor: respectively, 48, 34, and 27 percent. In Senegal, only 4 percent of the population is chronically poor. The middle group, the non-resilient, accounts for about 70 percent of the households in Senegal, while in the other countries it ranges between 34 and 38 percent. Resilient households account for about 33 percent in all countries except Niger, where the share is around 18 percent |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (38 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-7170 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048269243 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-7170 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465065 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334061056 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010465065 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Alfani, Federica |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can We Measure Resilience? |b A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |c Alfani, Federica |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (38 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a World Bank E-Library Archive | |
520 | |a Although resilience has become a popular concept in studies of poverty and vulnerability, it has been difficult to obtain a credible measure of resilience. This difficulty is because the data required to measure resilience, which involves observing household outcomes over time after every exposure to a shock, are usually unavailable in many contexts. This paper proposes a new method for measuring household resilience using readily available cross section data. Intuitively, a household is considered resilient if there is very little difference between the pre- and post-shock welfare. By obtaining counterfactual welfare for households before and after a shock, households are classified as chronically poor, non-resilient, and resilient. This method is applied to four countries in the Sahel. It is found that Niger, Burkina Faso, and Northern Nigeria have high percentages of chronically poor: respectively, 48, 34, and 27 percent. In Senegal, only 4 percent of the population is chronically poor. The middle group, the non-resilient, accounts for about 70 percent of the households in Senegal, while in the other countries it ranges between 34 and 38 percent. Resilient households account for about 33 percent in all countries except Niger, where the share is around 18 percent | ||
700 | 1 | |a Dabalen, Andrew |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Molini, Vasco |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fisker, Peter |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Alfani, Federica |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Alfani, Federica |t Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |d Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7170 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649438 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812671774044717057 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Alfani, Federica |
author_facet | Alfani, Federica |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Alfani, Federica |
author_variant | f a fa |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048269243 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465065 (OCoLC)1334061056 (DE-599)GBVNLM010465065 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-7170 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048269243</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-7170</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334061056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010465065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alfani, Federica</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can We Measure Resilience?</subfield><subfield code="b">A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel</subfield><subfield code="c">Alfani, Federica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (38 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank E-Library Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although resilience has become a popular concept in studies of poverty and vulnerability, it has been difficult to obtain a credible measure of resilience. This difficulty is because the data required to measure resilience, which involves observing household outcomes over time after every exposure to a shock, are usually unavailable in many contexts. This paper proposes a new method for measuring household resilience using readily available cross section data. Intuitively, a household is considered resilient if there is very little difference between the pre- and post-shock welfare. By obtaining counterfactual welfare for households before and after a shock, households are classified as chronically poor, non-resilient, and resilient. This method is applied to four countries in the Sahel. It is found that Niger, Burkina Faso, and Northern Nigeria have high percentages of chronically poor: respectively, 48, 34, and 27 percent. In Senegal, only 4 percent of the population is chronically poor. The middle group, the non-resilient, accounts for about 70 percent of the households in Senegal, while in the other countries it ranges between 34 and 38 percent. Resilient households account for about 33 percent in all countries except Niger, where the share is around 18 percent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dabalen, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Molini, Vasco</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fisker, Peter</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alfani, Federica</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Alfani, Federica</subfield><subfield code="t">Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7170</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649438</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048269243 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T20:00:00Z |
indexdate | 2024-10-12T04:01:54Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649438 |
oclc_num | 1334061056 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (38 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | World Bank E-Library Archive |
spellingShingle | Alfani, Federica Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
title | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
title_auth | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
title_exact_search | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
title_exact_search_txtP | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
title_full | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel Alfani, Federica |
title_fullStr | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel Alfani, Federica |
title_full_unstemmed | Can We Measure Resilience? A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel Alfani, Federica |
title_short | Can We Measure Resilience? |
title_sort | can we measure resilience a proposed method and evidence from countries in the sahel |
title_sub | A Proposed Method and Evidence from Countries in the Sahel |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfanifederica canwemeasureresilienceaproposedmethodandevidencefromcountriesinthesahel AT dabalenandrew canwemeasureresilienceaproposedmethodandevidencefromcountriesinthesahel AT molinivasco canwemeasureresilienceaproposedmethodandevidencefromcountriesinthesahel AT fiskerpeter canwemeasureresilienceaproposedmethodandevidencefromcountriesinthesahel |