Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health: Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis
Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including those pertaining to verification of outputs/results...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2016
|
Schriftenreihe: | Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Papers
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including those pertaining to verification of outputs/results is lacking in World Bank-financed RBF projects in the health sector. The overall objective of this cross-case analysis is to expand knowledge about verification processes andpractices to address the design and implementation needs of RBF projects. This study adds toavailable knowledge by comparing the characteristics of verification strategies as well as available data on costs (using level of effort as a proxy), savings, and verification results to date in six countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Burundi, Panama, Rwanda, and the UK. These case studies were purposively selected to explore a number of factors, including: how a variety of results are verified; how the verification strategy is being implemented at different levels in the health system; and the implications of having different types of actors (that is, third-party versus internal verifiers) involved in the verification process. In this cross-case analysis, the discussion of similarities and differences in verification methods across the six cases as well as the analysis of findings is guided by a conceptual framework developed for this study. This study presents seventeen key findings, and nine recommendations |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
DOI: | 10.1596/26040 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048267330 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/26040 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010445331 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334039097 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010445331 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vergeer, Petronella |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health |b Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |c Petronella Vergeer |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Papers | |
520 | |a Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including those pertaining to verification of outputs/results is lacking in World Bank-financed RBF projects in the health sector. The overall objective of this cross-case analysis is to expand knowledge about verification processes andpractices to address the design and implementation needs of RBF projects. This study adds toavailable knowledge by comparing the characteristics of verification strategies as well as available data on costs (using level of effort as a proxy), savings, and verification results to date in six countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Burundi, Panama, Rwanda, and the UK. These case studies were purposively selected to explore a number of factors, including: how a variety of results are verified; how the verification strategy is being implemented at different levels in the health system; and the implications of having different types of actors (that is, third-party versus internal verifiers) involved in the verification process. In this cross-case analysis, the discussion of similarities and differences in verification methods across the six cases as well as the analysis of findings is guided by a conceptual framework developed for this study. This study presents seventeen key findings, and nine recommendations | ||
700 | 1 | |a Fleisher, Lisa |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vergeer, Petronella |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Josephson, Erik |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Heard, Anna |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/26040 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033647524 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812671748266524672 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Vergeer, Petronella |
author_facet | Vergeer, Petronella |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Vergeer, Petronella |
author_variant | p v pv |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048267330 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010445331 (OCoLC)1334039097 (DE-599)GBVNLM010445331 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/26040 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048267330</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/26040</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010445331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334039097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010445331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vergeer, Petronella</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health</subfield><subfield code="b">Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Petronella Vergeer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including those pertaining to verification of outputs/results is lacking in World Bank-financed RBF projects in the health sector. The overall objective of this cross-case analysis is to expand knowledge about verification processes andpractices to address the design and implementation needs of RBF projects. This study adds toavailable knowledge by comparing the characteristics of verification strategies as well as available data on costs (using level of effort as a proxy), savings, and verification results to date in six countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Burundi, Panama, Rwanda, and the UK. These case studies were purposively selected to explore a number of factors, including: how a variety of results are verified; how the verification strategy is being implemented at different levels in the health system; and the implications of having different types of actors (that is, third-party versus internal verifiers) involved in the verification process. In this cross-case analysis, the discussion of similarities and differences in verification methods across the six cases as well as the analysis of findings is guided by a conceptual framework developed for this study. This study presents seventeen key findings, and nine recommendations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fleisher, Lisa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vergeer, Petronella</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Josephson, Erik</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heard, Anna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/26040</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033647524</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048267330 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:56Z |
indexdate | 2024-10-12T04:01:30Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033647524 |
oclc_num | 1334039097 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Papers |
spellingShingle | Vergeer, Petronella Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_auth | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_exact_search | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_exact_search_txtP | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_full | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis Petronella Vergeer |
title_fullStr | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis Petronella Vergeer |
title_full_unstemmed | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis Petronella Vergeer |
title_short | Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health |
title_sort | verification in results based financing for health summary of findings and recommendations from a cross case analysis |
title_sub | Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/26040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vergeerpetronella verificationinresultsbasedfinancingforhealthsummaryoffindingsandrecommendationsfromacrosscaseanalysis AT fleisherlisa verificationinresultsbasedfinancingforhealthsummaryoffindingsandrecommendationsfromacrosscaseanalysis AT josephsonerik verificationinresultsbasedfinancingforhealthsummaryoffindingsandrecommendationsfromacrosscaseanalysis AT heardanna verificationinresultsbasedfinancingforhealthsummaryoffindingsandrecommendationsfromacrosscaseanalysis |