A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators:
This paper presents asymptotic theory and Monte-Carlo simulations comparing maximum-likelihood bivariate probit and linear instrumental variables estimators of treatment effects in models with a binary endogenous treatment and binary outcome. The three main contributions of the paper are (a) clarify...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2011
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper presents asymptotic theory and Monte-Carlo simulations comparing maximum-likelihood bivariate probit and linear instrumental variables estimators of treatment effects in models with a binary endogenous treatment and binary outcome. The three main contributions of the paper are (a) clarifying the relationship between the Average Treatment Effect obtained in the bivariate probit model and the Local Average Treatment Effect estimated through linear IV; (b) comparing the mean-square error and the actual size and power of tests based on these estimators across a wide range of parameter values relative to the existing literature; and (c) assessing the performance of misspecification tests for bivariate probit models. The authors recommend two changes to common practices: bootstrapped confidence intervals for both estimators, and a score test to check goodness of fit for the bivariate probit model |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-5601 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048265039 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5601 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010326979 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334028945 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010326979 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chiburis, Richard C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |c Richard C. Chiburis |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2011 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper presents asymptotic theory and Monte-Carlo simulations comparing maximum-likelihood bivariate probit and linear instrumental variables estimators of treatment effects in models with a binary endogenous treatment and binary outcome. The three main contributions of the paper are (a) clarifying the relationship between the Average Treatment Effect obtained in the bivariate probit model and the Local Average Treatment Effect estimated through linear IV; (b) comparing the mean-square error and the actual size and power of tests based on these estimators across a wide range of parameter values relative to the existing literature; and (c) assessing the performance of misspecification tests for bivariate probit models. The authors recommend two changes to common practices: bootstrapped confidence intervals for both estimators, and a score test to check goodness of fit for the bivariate probit model | ||
700 | 1 | |a Das, Jishnu |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lokshin, Michael |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chiburis, Richard C. |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Chiburis, Richard C |a A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5601 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645233 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1824556150284091392 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Chiburis, Richard C. |
author_facet | Chiburis, Richard C. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Chiburis, Richard C. |
author_variant | r c c rc rcc |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048265039 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010326979 (OCoLC)1334028945 (DE-599)GBVNLM010326979 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-5601 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048265039</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-5601</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010326979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334028945</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010326979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chiburis, Richard C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators</subfield><subfield code="c">Richard C. Chiburis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (44 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper presents asymptotic theory and Monte-Carlo simulations comparing maximum-likelihood bivariate probit and linear instrumental variables estimators of treatment effects in models with a binary endogenous treatment and binary outcome. The three main contributions of the paper are (a) clarifying the relationship between the Average Treatment Effect obtained in the bivariate probit model and the Local Average Treatment Effect estimated through linear IV; (b) comparing the mean-square error and the actual size and power of tests based on these estimators across a wide range of parameter values relative to the existing literature; and (c) assessing the performance of misspecification tests for bivariate probit models. The authors recommend two changes to common practices: bootstrapped confidence intervals for both estimators, and a score test to check goodness of fit for the bivariate probit model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Das, Jishnu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lokshin, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chiburis, Richard C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Chiburis, Richard C</subfield><subfield code="a">A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5601</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645233</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048265039 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:50Z |
indexdate | 2025-02-20T07:18:59Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645233 |
oclc_num | 1334028945 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2011 |
publishDateSearch | 2011 |
publishDateSort | 2011 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
spellingShingle | Chiburis, Richard C. A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title_auth | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title_exact_search | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title_exact_search_txtP | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title_full | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators Richard C. Chiburis |
title_fullStr | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators Richard C. Chiburis |
title_full_unstemmed | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators Richard C. Chiburis |
title_short | A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators |
title_sort | a practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear iv estimators |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiburisrichardc apracticalcomparisonofthebivariateprobitandlinearivestimators AT dasjishnu apracticalcomparisonofthebivariateprobitandlinearivestimators AT lokshinmichael apracticalcomparisonofthebivariateprobitandlinearivestimators |