Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys?: evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria
A potential concern with survey-based data on corruption is that respondents may not be fully candid in their responses to sensitive questions. If reticent respondents are less likely to admit to involvement in corrupt acts, and if the proportion of reticent respondents varies across groups of inter...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2010
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | A potential concern with survey-based data on corruption is that respondents may not be fully candid in their responses to sensitive questions. If reticent respondents are less likely to admit to involvement in corrupt acts, and if the proportion of reticent respondents varies across groups of interest, comparisons of reported corruption across those groups can be misleading. This paper implements a variant on random response techniques that allows for identification of reticent respondents in the World Bank's Enterprise Survey for Nigeria fielded in 2008 and 2009. The authors find that 13.1 percent of respondents are highly likely to be reticent, and that these reticent respondents admit to sensitive acts at a significantly lower rate than possibly candid respondents when survey questions are worded in a way that implies personal wrongdoing on the part of the respondent |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (27 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-5415 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048264856 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5415 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010325166 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334038511 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010325166 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kraay, Aart |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? |b evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |c Kraay, Aart |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2010 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (27 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A potential concern with survey-based data on corruption is that respondents may not be fully candid in their responses to sensitive questions. If reticent respondents are less likely to admit to involvement in corrupt acts, and if the proportion of reticent respondents varies across groups of interest, comparisons of reported corruption across those groups can be misleading. This paper implements a variant on random response techniques that allows for identification of reticent respondents in the World Bank's Enterprise Survey for Nigeria fielded in 2008 and 2009. The authors find that 13.1 percent of respondents are highly likely to be reticent, and that these reticent respondents admit to sensitive acts at a significantly lower rate than possibly candid respondents when survey questions are worded in a way that implies personal wrongdoing on the part of the respondent | ||
700 | 1 | |a Kraay, Aart |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Clausen, Bianca |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Murrell, Peter |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Kraay, Aart |a Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5415 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645050 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812671722617307136 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Kraay, Aart |
author_facet | Kraay, Aart |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Kraay, Aart |
author_variant | a k ak |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048264856 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010325166 (OCoLC)1334038511 (DE-599)GBVNLM010325166 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-5415 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048264856</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-5415</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010325166</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334038511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010325166</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kraay, Aart</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys?</subfield><subfield code="b">evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria</subfield><subfield code="c">Kraay, Aart</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (27 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A potential concern with survey-based data on corruption is that respondents may not be fully candid in their responses to sensitive questions. If reticent respondents are less likely to admit to involvement in corrupt acts, and if the proportion of reticent respondents varies across groups of interest, comparisons of reported corruption across those groups can be misleading. This paper implements a variant on random response techniques that allows for identification of reticent respondents in the World Bank's Enterprise Survey for Nigeria fielded in 2008 and 2009. The authors find that 13.1 percent of respondents are highly likely to be reticent, and that these reticent respondents admit to sensitive acts at a significantly lower rate than possibly candid respondents when survey questions are worded in a way that implies personal wrongdoing on the part of the respondent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kraay, Aart</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clausen, Bianca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Murrell, Peter</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Kraay, Aart</subfield><subfield code="a">Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5415</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645050</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048264856 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:50Z |
indexdate | 2024-10-12T04:01:05Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645050 |
oclc_num | 1334038511 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (27 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2010 |
publishDateSearch | 2010 |
publishDateSort | 2010 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
spellingShingle | Kraay, Aart Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
title | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
title_auth | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
title_exact_search | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
title_exact_search_txtP | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
title_full | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria Kraay, Aart |
title_fullStr | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria Kraay, Aart |
title_full_unstemmed | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria Kraay, Aart |
title_short | Does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys? |
title_sort | does respondent reticence affect the results of corruption surveys evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for nigeria |
title_sub | evidence from the world bank enterprise survey for Nigeria |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kraayaart doesrespondentreticenceaffecttheresultsofcorruptionsurveysevidencefromtheworldbankenterprisesurveyfornigeria AT clausenbianca doesrespondentreticenceaffecttheresultsofcorruptionsurveysevidencefromtheworldbankenterprisesurveyfornigeria AT murrellpeter doesrespondentreticenceaffecttheresultsofcorruptionsurveysevidencefromtheworldbankenterprisesurveyfornigeria |