Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In this paper the author analyses the institutional physiognomy of constitutional complaint in the Republic of Serbia, as well as it implementation in practice in light of institutional models of three respectable countries − Germany, Austria and Spain. Furthermore, it looks at some specific characteristics of constitutional systems which have subsequently established this legal remedy. Regarding the fact that comparative law does not provide an uniform institutional model of constitutional complaint and the limited experience of the Republic of Serbia with this institute, many questions have been raised in that field in our theory. At first glance, it seems that the 2006 Constitution of Serbia has very extensively established the possibility of utilizing constitutional complaint, which created a risk of impeding the work of the Constitutional Court. Data regarding the work of the Constitutional Court shows that deciding-on constitutional complaints has become the dominant competency of this body. Because of that it is necessary to establish more efficient mechanism of preliminary selection of constitutional complaints. In addition, the possibility of the Constitutional Court to annul court decisions has created tension between this Court and the High Court of Cassation. Hence, the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the ordinary courts must be more precisely and consistently regulated by a normative framework. In any case, the decreasing number of cases appearing before the European Court for Human Rights against Serbia shows that constitutional complaint is an increasingly effective legal remedy. However, for full affirmation of constitutional complaint as the legal remedy for protection of human rights, it is necessary to also develop an appropriate legal culture, which requires time |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 27) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262855 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800340 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334045555 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262855 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Simović, Darko |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |c Darko Simović |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 27) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In this paper the author analyses the institutional physiognomy of constitutional complaint in the Republic of Serbia, as well as it implementation in practice in light of institutional models of three respectable countries − Germany, Austria and Spain. Furthermore, it looks at some specific characteristics of constitutional systems which have subsequently established this legal remedy. Regarding the fact that comparative law does not provide an uniform institutional model of constitutional complaint and the limited experience of the Republic of Serbia with this institute, many questions have been raised in that field in our theory. At first glance, it seems that the 2006 Constitution of Serbia has very extensively established the possibility of utilizing constitutional complaint, which created a risk of impeding the work of the Constitutional Court. Data regarding the work of the Constitutional Court shows that deciding-on constitutional complaints has become the dominant competency of this body. Because of that it is necessary to establish more efficient mechanism of preliminary selection of constitutional complaints. In addition, the possibility of the Constitutional Court to annul court decisions has created tension between this Court and the High Court of Cassation. Hence, the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the ordinary courts must be more precisely and consistently regulated by a normative framework. In any case, the decreasing number of cases appearing before the European Court for Human Rights against Serbia shows that constitutional complaint is an increasingly effective legal remedy. However, for full affirmation of constitutional complaint as the legal remedy for protection of human rights, it is necessary to also develop an appropriate legal culture, which requires time | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643058 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800340 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184067218866176 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Simović, Darko |
| author_facet | Simović, Darko |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Simović, Darko |
| author_variant | d s ds |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262855 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800340 (OCoLC)1334045555 (DE-599)BVBBV048262855 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03002nmm a2200361zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262855</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334045555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262855</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simović, Darko</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja</subfield><subfield code="c">Darko Simović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 27)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper the author analyses the institutional physiognomy of constitutional complaint in the Republic of Serbia, as well as it implementation in practice in light of institutional models of three respectable countries − Germany, Austria and Spain. Furthermore, it looks at some specific characteristics of constitutional systems which have subsequently established this legal remedy. Regarding the fact that comparative law does not provide an uniform institutional model of constitutional complaint and the limited experience of the Republic of Serbia with this institute, many questions have been raised in that field in our theory. At first glance, it seems that the 2006 Constitution of Serbia has very extensively established the possibility of utilizing constitutional complaint, which created a risk of impeding the work of the Constitutional Court. Data regarding the work of the Constitutional Court shows that deciding-on constitutional complaints has become the dominant competency of this body. Because of that it is necessary to establish more efficient mechanism of preliminary selection of constitutional complaints. In addition, the possibility of the Constitutional Court to annul court decisions has created tension between this Court and the High Court of Cassation. Hence, the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the ordinary courts must be more precisely and consistently regulated by a normative framework. In any case, the decreasing number of cases appearing before the European Court for Human Rights against Serbia shows that constitutional complaint is an increasingly effective legal remedy. However, for full affirmation of constitutional complaint as the legal remedy for protection of human rights, it is necessary to also develop an appropriate legal culture, which requires time</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643058</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800340</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262855 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643058 |
| oclc_num | 1334045555 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 27) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Simović, Darko Verfasser aut Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja Darko Simović Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 27) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this paper the author analyses the institutional physiognomy of constitutional complaint in the Republic of Serbia, as well as it implementation in practice in light of institutional models of three respectable countries − Germany, Austria and Spain. Furthermore, it looks at some specific characteristics of constitutional systems which have subsequently established this legal remedy. Regarding the fact that comparative law does not provide an uniform institutional model of constitutional complaint and the limited experience of the Republic of Serbia with this institute, many questions have been raised in that field in our theory. At first glance, it seems that the 2006 Constitution of Serbia has very extensively established the possibility of utilizing constitutional complaint, which created a risk of impeding the work of the Constitutional Court. Data regarding the work of the Constitutional Court shows that deciding-on constitutional complaints has become the dominant competency of this body. Because of that it is necessary to establish more efficient mechanism of preliminary selection of constitutional complaints. In addition, the possibility of the Constitutional Court to annul court decisions has created tension between this Court and the High Court of Cassation. Hence, the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the ordinary courts must be more precisely and consistently regulated by a normative framework. In any case, the decreasing number of cases appearing before the European Court for Human Rights against Serbia shows that constitutional complaint is an increasingly effective legal remedy. However, for full affirmation of constitutional complaint as the legal remedy for protection of human rights, it is necessary to also develop an appropriate legal culture, which requires time Constitutional Law Public Law |
| spellingShingle | Simović, Darko Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja Constitutional Law Public Law |
| title | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |
| title_auth | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |
| title_exact_search | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |
| title_full | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja Darko Simović |
| title_fullStr | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja Darko Simović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja Darko Simović |
| title_short | Institucionalna fizionomija ustavne žalbe u Republici Srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih rešenja |
| title_sort | institucionalna fizionomija ustavne zalbe u republici srbiji u svetlosti uporednopravnih resenja |
| topic | Constitutional Law Public Law |
| topic_facet | Constitutional Law Public Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT simovicdarko institucionalnafizionomijaustavnezalbeurepublicisrbijiusvetlostiuporednopravnihresenja |