Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | There is a long-standing conflict between the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court over constitutional appeals, which affects legal certainty and the equal protection of the rights of parties in judicial proceedings. Overcoming this dispute is possible within the existing normative solutions - by rectifying the actions of both courts. In order not to become a supreme court that reviews judicial decisions in the same way as regular instance courts do, the Constitutional Court must recourse to self-restraining when deciding on constitutional appeals. The Constitutional Court should only annual judicial decisions when the harmful consequences of unconstitutionality cannot be eradicated by reopening judicial proceedings. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Cassation must execute the Constitutional Court's decisions enacted on the constitutional appeals by applying the legal stances taken in those decisions, based on the principle stare decisis |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262854 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800342 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334036080 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262854 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |c Katarina Manojlović-Andrić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a There is a long-standing conflict between the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court over constitutional appeals, which affects legal certainty and the equal protection of the rights of parties in judicial proceedings. Overcoming this dispute is possible within the existing normative solutions - by rectifying the actions of both courts. In order not to become a supreme court that reviews judicial decisions in the same way as regular instance courts do, the Constitutional Court must recourse to self-restraining when deciding on constitutional appeals. The Constitutional Court should only annual judicial decisions when the harmful consequences of unconstitutionality cannot be eradicated by reopening judicial proceedings. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Cassation must execute the Constitutional Court's decisions enacted on the constitutional appeals by applying the legal stances taken in those decisions, based on the principle stare decisis | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peace and Conflict Studies | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643057 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800342 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184067214671872 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina |
| author_facet | Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina |
| author_variant | k m a kma |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262854 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800342 (OCoLC)1334036080 (DE-599)BVBBV048262854 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02194nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334036080</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje</subfield><subfield code="c">Katarina Manojlović-Andrić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is a long-standing conflict between the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court over constitutional appeals, which affects legal certainty and the equal protection of the rights of parties in judicial proceedings. Overcoming this dispute is possible within the existing normative solutions - by rectifying the actions of both courts. In order not to become a supreme court that reviews judicial decisions in the same way as regular instance courts do, the Constitutional Court must recourse to self-restraining when deciding on constitutional appeals. The Constitutional Court should only annual judicial decisions when the harmful consequences of unconstitutionality cannot be eradicated by reopening judicial proceedings. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Cassation must execute the Constitutional Court's decisions enacted on the constitutional appeals by applying the legal stances taken in those decisions, based on the principle stare decisis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peace and Conflict Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800342</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262854 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643057 |
| oclc_num | 1334036080 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina Verfasser aut Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje Katarina Manojlović-Andrić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier There is a long-standing conflict between the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court over constitutional appeals, which affects legal certainty and the equal protection of the rights of parties in judicial proceedings. Overcoming this dispute is possible within the existing normative solutions - by rectifying the actions of both courts. In order not to become a supreme court that reviews judicial decisions in the same way as regular instance courts do, the Constitutional Court must recourse to self-restraining when deciding on constitutional appeals. The Constitutional Court should only annual judicial decisions when the harmful consequences of unconstitutionality cannot be eradicated by reopening judicial proceedings. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Cassation must execute the Constitutional Court's decisions enacted on the constitutional appeals by applying the legal stances taken in those decisions, based on the principle stare decisis Constitutional Law Public Law Peace and Conflict Studies |
| spellingShingle | Manojlović-Andrić, Katarina Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje Constitutional Law Public Law Peace and Conflict Studies |
| title | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| title_auth | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| title_exact_search | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| title_full | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje Katarina Manojlović-Andrić |
| title_fullStr | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje Katarina Manojlović-Andrić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje Katarina Manojlović-Andrić |
| title_short | Odnos Vrhovnog kasacionog suda i Ustavnog suda - konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| title_sort | odnos vrhovnog kasacionog suda i ustavnog suda konflikt koji i dalje traje |
| topic | Constitutional Law Public Law Peace and Conflict Studies |
| topic_facet | Constitutional Law Public Law Peace and Conflict Studies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT manojlovicandrickatarina odnosvrhovnogkasacionogsudaiustavnogsudakonfliktkojiidaljetraje |