Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | Constitutional appeal has become an effective tool for protection of human and minority rights and freedoms by the Constitution of Republic Serbia in 2006. Since than, he Constitutional court has the opportunity to review the individual legal acts in the constitutional appeal procedure. However, from the outset, the question arose as to whether this power of the Constitutional Court also implied the possibility of reviewing court decisions; does it include the right of the Constitutional court to annul court decisions if it found that they had been violated a constitutionally protected right. In its jurisprudence, the Constitutional court overturned court decisions in such situations, which led to controversy and latent conflict in the relationship of this court to the ordinary judiciary, esspecialy to the Supreme Court. Since 2013, the Constitutional court's ability to overturn court decisions in proceedings on constitutional appeal has also been confirmed by a Constitutional Court decision declaring a legal provision under which it had no right. To date, the Constitutional Court has overturned 3,867 court decisions, which is not an insignificant number. The key question is whether he assumes the authority and role of the classic courts of the ordinary court. An analysis of the case-law and the views of the Constitutional Court shows that it does so in two basic cases - when there is obvious arbitrariness in the application of the law of ordinary courts and in the case of an insufficiently reasoned court decision. In both cases, the Constitutional Court often finds itself in slippery ground, because by its interpretation and argument it often delves into the sphere reserved by the regular judiciary |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262851 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800351 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334028519 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262851 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zekavica, Radomir |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |c Radomir Zekavica |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Constitutional appeal has become an effective tool for protection of human and minority rights and freedoms by the Constitution of Republic Serbia in 2006. Since than, he Constitutional court has the opportunity to review the individual legal acts in the constitutional appeal procedure. However, from the outset, the question arose as to whether this power of the Constitutional Court also implied the possibility of reviewing court decisions; does it include the right of the Constitutional court to annul court decisions if it found that they had been violated a constitutionally protected right. In its jurisprudence, the Constitutional court overturned court decisions in such situations, which led to controversy and latent conflict in the relationship of this court to the ordinary judiciary, esspecialy to the Supreme Court. Since 2013, the Constitutional court's ability to overturn court decisions in proceedings on constitutional appeal has also been confirmed by a Constitutional Court decision declaring a legal provision under which it had no right. To date, the Constitutional Court has overturned 3,867 court decisions, which is not an insignificant number. The key question is whether he assumes the authority and role of the classic courts of the ordinary court. An analysis of the case-law and the views of the Constitutional Court shows that it does so in two basic cases - when there is obvious arbitrariness in the application of the law of ordinary courts and in the case of an insufficiently reasoned court decision. In both cases, the Constitutional Court often finds itself in slippery ground, because by its interpretation and argument it often delves into the sphere reserved by the regular judiciary | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643054 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800351 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184067213623296 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Zekavica, Radomir |
| author_facet | Zekavica, Radomir |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Zekavica, Radomir |
| author_variant | r z rz |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262851 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800351 (OCoLC)1334028519 (DE-599)BVBBV048262851 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02951nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262851</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334028519</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262851</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zekavica, Radomir</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi</subfield><subfield code="c">Radomir Zekavica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constitutional appeal has become an effective tool for protection of human and minority rights and freedoms by the Constitution of Republic Serbia in 2006. Since than, he Constitutional court has the opportunity to review the individual legal acts in the constitutional appeal procedure. However, from the outset, the question arose as to whether this power of the Constitutional Court also implied the possibility of reviewing court decisions; does it include the right of the Constitutional court to annul court decisions if it found that they had been violated a constitutionally protected right. In its jurisprudence, the Constitutional court overturned court decisions in such situations, which led to controversy and latent conflict in the relationship of this court to the ordinary judiciary, esspecialy to the Supreme Court. Since 2013, the Constitutional court's ability to overturn court decisions in proceedings on constitutional appeal has also been confirmed by a Constitutional Court decision declaring a legal provision under which it had no right. To date, the Constitutional Court has overturned 3,867 court decisions, which is not an insignificant number. The key question is whether he assumes the authority and role of the classic courts of the ordinary court. An analysis of the case-law and the views of the Constitutional Court shows that it does so in two basic cases - when there is obvious arbitrariness in the application of the law of ordinary courts and in the case of an insufficiently reasoned court decision. In both cases, the Constitutional Court often finds itself in slippery ground, because by its interpretation and argument it often delves into the sphere reserved by the regular judiciary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643054</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800351</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262851 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643054 |
| oclc_num | 1334028519 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Zekavica, Radomir Verfasser aut Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi Radomir Zekavica Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Constitutional appeal has become an effective tool for protection of human and minority rights and freedoms by the Constitution of Republic Serbia in 2006. Since than, he Constitutional court has the opportunity to review the individual legal acts in the constitutional appeal procedure. However, from the outset, the question arose as to whether this power of the Constitutional Court also implied the possibility of reviewing court decisions; does it include the right of the Constitutional court to annul court decisions if it found that they had been violated a constitutionally protected right. In its jurisprudence, the Constitutional court overturned court decisions in such situations, which led to controversy and latent conflict in the relationship of this court to the ordinary judiciary, esspecialy to the Supreme Court. Since 2013, the Constitutional court's ability to overturn court decisions in proceedings on constitutional appeal has also been confirmed by a Constitutional Court decision declaring a legal provision under which it had no right. To date, the Constitutional Court has overturned 3,867 court decisions, which is not an insignificant number. The key question is whether he assumes the authority and role of the classic courts of the ordinary court. An analysis of the case-law and the views of the Constitutional Court shows that it does so in two basic cases - when there is obvious arbitrariness in the application of the law of ordinary courts and in the case of an insufficiently reasoned court decision. In both cases, the Constitutional Court often finds itself in slippery ground, because by its interpretation and argument it often delves into the sphere reserved by the regular judiciary Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| spellingShingle | Zekavica, Radomir Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| title | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |
| title_auth | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |
| title_exact_search | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |
| title_full | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi Radomir Zekavica |
| title_fullStr | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi Radomir Zekavica |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi Radomir Zekavica |
| title_short | Analiza instancionog karaktera odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije u postupku po ustavnoj žalbi |
| title_sort | analiza instancionog karaktera odluka ustavnog suda republike srbije u postupku po ustavnoj zalbi |
| topic | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| topic_facet | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zekavicaradomir analizainstancionogkarakteraodlukaustavnogsudarepublikesrbijeupostupkupoustavnojzalbi |