Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Bosnian |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | In this article the author discusses theoretical framework of fiscal federalism through his four keys determinants: assignment of functions and expenditures, public revenue assignment, intergovernmental transfers and borrowing. Fiscal federalism deals with these issues which are closely related with fiscal decentralization. Guided by these determinants, the author applied them to a complex state structure in BiH. Fiscal federalism in BiH is intriguing question having in mind current political relations and constitutional order of the state. After detailed analysis, the five striking conclusions drawn by the author are: 1. stronger central government position - current position of central government is not strong enough to lead quality macroeconomic management. One of author's suggestions is transfer of competences from entities to central government in the field of direct taxes. This transfer would enable the principle of costeffectiveness to be achieved; 2. independent fiscal council - fiscal council has two main disadvantages: a) political influence b) insufficient coordination of all levels of government. Fiscal council should be only a financial institution isolated from political influence and should represent a connection between all levels of government including cantons and municipalities; 3. more systematic use of intergovernmental transfers - intergovernmental transfers are important instrument for achieving fiscal equity in fiscal federalism, but in BiH these transfers need to be more systematic as the disparity in the development of regions becomes greater 4. Development budget - condition sine qua non - budgets of all government in BiH should be oriented to capital investments not only to fund a complex administration 5. borrowing - according to an official report, status of public debt is not negative but those responsible must keep in mind the rise in interest rates on domestic debt, poor credit ratings and currency risk for non-euro loans |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048262846 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800484 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334015605 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262846 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a bos | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ramić, Lejla |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |c Lejla Ramić |
264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a In this article the author discusses theoretical framework of fiscal federalism through his four keys determinants: assignment of functions and expenditures, public revenue assignment, intergovernmental transfers and borrowing. Fiscal federalism deals with these issues which are closely related with fiscal decentralization. Guided by these determinants, the author applied them to a complex state structure in BiH. Fiscal federalism in BiH is intriguing question having in mind current political relations and constitutional order of the state. After detailed analysis, the five striking conclusions drawn by the author are: 1. stronger central government position - current position of central government is not strong enough to lead quality macroeconomic management. One of author's suggestions is transfer of competences from entities to central government in the field of direct taxes. This transfer would enable the principle of costeffectiveness to be achieved; 2. independent fiscal council - fiscal council has two main disadvantages: a) political influence b) insufficient coordination of all levels of government. Fiscal council should be only a financial institution isolated from political influence and should represent a connection between all levels of government including cantons and municipalities; 3. more systematic use of intergovernmental transfers - intergovernmental transfers are important instrument for achieving fiscal equity in fiscal federalism, but in BiH these transfers need to be more systematic as the disparity in the development of regions becomes greater 4. Development budget - condition sine qua non - budgets of all government in BiH should be oriented to capital investments not only to fund a complex administration 5. borrowing - according to an official report, status of public debt is not negative but those responsible must keep in mind the rise in interest rates on domestic debt, poor credit ratings and currency risk for non-euro loans | ||
650 | 4 | |a National Economy | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Government/Political systems | |
650 | 4 | |a Political economy | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic development | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Finances | |
650 | 4 | |a Fiscal Politics / Budgeting | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643049 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800484 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184067212574720 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Ramić, Lejla |
author_facet | Ramić, Lejla |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Ramić, Lejla |
author_variant | l r lr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048262846 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800484 (OCoLC)1334015605 (DE-599)BVBBV048262846 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03301nmm a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262846</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800484</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334015605</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262846</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ramić, Lejla</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH</subfield><subfield code="c">Lejla Ramić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this article the author discusses theoretical framework of fiscal federalism through his four keys determinants: assignment of functions and expenditures, public revenue assignment, intergovernmental transfers and borrowing. Fiscal federalism deals with these issues which are closely related with fiscal decentralization. Guided by these determinants, the author applied them to a complex state structure in BiH. Fiscal federalism in BiH is intriguing question having in mind current political relations and constitutional order of the state. After detailed analysis, the five striking conclusions drawn by the author are: 1. stronger central government position - current position of central government is not strong enough to lead quality macroeconomic management. One of author's suggestions is transfer of competences from entities to central government in the field of direct taxes. This transfer would enable the principle of costeffectiveness to be achieved; 2. independent fiscal council - fiscal council has two main disadvantages: a) political influence b) insufficient coordination of all levels of government. Fiscal council should be only a financial institution isolated from political influence and should represent a connection between all levels of government including cantons and municipalities; 3. more systematic use of intergovernmental transfers - intergovernmental transfers are important instrument for achieving fiscal equity in fiscal federalism, but in BiH these transfers need to be more systematic as the disparity in the development of regions becomes greater 4. Development budget - condition sine qua non - budgets of all government in BiH should be oriented to capital investments not only to fund a complex administration 5. borrowing - according to an official report, status of public debt is not negative but those responsible must keep in mind the rise in interest rates on domestic debt, poor credit ratings and currency risk for non-euro loans</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National Economy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government/Political systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political economy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Finances</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiscal Politics / Budgeting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800484</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048262846 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
institution | BVB |
language | Bosnian |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643049 |
oclc_num | 1334015605 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Ramić, Lejla Verfasser aut Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH Lejla Ramić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this article the author discusses theoretical framework of fiscal federalism through his four keys determinants: assignment of functions and expenditures, public revenue assignment, intergovernmental transfers and borrowing. Fiscal federalism deals with these issues which are closely related with fiscal decentralization. Guided by these determinants, the author applied them to a complex state structure in BiH. Fiscal federalism in BiH is intriguing question having in mind current political relations and constitutional order of the state. After detailed analysis, the five striking conclusions drawn by the author are: 1. stronger central government position - current position of central government is not strong enough to lead quality macroeconomic management. One of author's suggestions is transfer of competences from entities to central government in the field of direct taxes. This transfer would enable the principle of costeffectiveness to be achieved; 2. independent fiscal council - fiscal council has two main disadvantages: a) political influence b) insufficient coordination of all levels of government. Fiscal council should be only a financial institution isolated from political influence and should represent a connection between all levels of government including cantons and municipalities; 3. more systematic use of intergovernmental transfers - intergovernmental transfers are important instrument for achieving fiscal equity in fiscal federalism, but in BiH these transfers need to be more systematic as the disparity in the development of regions becomes greater 4. Development budget - condition sine qua non - budgets of all government in BiH should be oriented to capital investments not only to fund a complex administration 5. borrowing - according to an official report, status of public debt is not negative but those responsible must keep in mind the rise in interest rates on domestic debt, poor credit ratings and currency risk for non-euro loans National Economy Economic policy Government/Political systems Political economy Economic development Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
spellingShingle | Ramić, Lejla Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH National Economy Economic policy Government/Political systems Political economy Economic development Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
title | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |
title_auth | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |
title_exact_search | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |
title_exact_search_txtP | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |
title_full | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH Lejla Ramić |
title_fullStr | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH Lejla Ramić |
title_full_unstemmed | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH Lejla Ramić |
title_short | Fiskalni federalizam između teorije i prakse u BiH |
title_sort | fiskalni federalizam izmedu teorije i prakse u bih |
topic | National Economy Economic policy Government/Political systems Political economy Economic development Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
topic_facet | National Economy Economic policy Government/Political systems Political economy Economic development Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramiclejla fiskalnifederalizamizmeđuteorijeiprakseubih |