Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In December 2019 it will ten years of Sejdić and Finci judgment of the European Court for Human Rights. It was followed by Zornić, Šlaku and Pilav judgments. The Court found that Bosnian Constitution was not in the line with the European Convention for Human Rights. In Zornić and Šlaku judgments under Article 46 of the Convention, Court stated that in order to implement these judgments, Bosnia and Herzegovina would have to introduce constitutional and legislation amendments. All four attempts by BH public authorities to enforce Sejdić and Finci group judgments were unsuccessful. These attempts were characterized by: a short deadline for the drafting constitutional amendments and amendments to the Electoral Law, failure to hold sessions of the working group/parliamentary commission due to the absence of its members and consequent lack of a quorum, apparent transparency in work and lack of will to fulfil the mandate of the working group/parliamentary commission and efforts to reach an agreement on amendments. Parallel to these formal attempts, there was non-institutional process with the aim to reach a political agreement on constitutional reform. This two years process involved seven presidents of parliamentary political parties and it was facilitated by European Union. The process was not transparent, public has no insights about different proposals and it was conducted only in closed circle of seven politicians. Eventually it did not deliver any results. In order to have Court's judgments implemented, a few conditions need to be met: it has to be done within Parliamentary Assembly which has a competence to change constitution, Council of Europe bodies like Parliamentary Assembly, Secretary General and its member states should act in synergy to produce a pressure on Bosnia and Herzegovina to fulfil its international obligation such is Court's judgment implementation and Bosnian politicians have to understand implementation of these four judgments as issue of the rule of law and not to use it for its party and ethnic interests |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 30) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262656 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800506 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334050294 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262656 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Išerić, Harun |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |c Harun Išerić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 30) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In December 2019 it will ten years of Sejdić and Finci judgment of the European Court for Human Rights. It was followed by Zornić, Šlaku and Pilav judgments. The Court found that Bosnian Constitution was not in the line with the European Convention for Human Rights. In Zornić and Šlaku judgments under Article 46 of the Convention, Court stated that in order to implement these judgments, Bosnia and Herzegovina would have to introduce constitutional and legislation amendments. All four attempts by BH public authorities to enforce Sejdić and Finci group judgments were unsuccessful. | ||
| 500 | |a These attempts were characterized by: a short deadline for the drafting constitutional amendments and amendments to the Electoral Law, failure to hold sessions of the working group/parliamentary commission due to the absence of its members and consequent lack of a quorum, apparent transparency in work and lack of will to fulfil the mandate of the working group/parliamentary commission and efforts to reach an agreement on amendments. Parallel to these formal attempts, there was non-institutional process with the aim to reach a political agreement on constitutional reform. This two years process involved seven presidents of parliamentary political parties and it was facilitated by European Union. The process was not transparent, public has no insights about different proposals and it was conducted only in closed circle of seven politicians. Eventually it did not deliver any results. | ||
| 500 | |a In order to have Court's judgments implemented, a few conditions need to be met: it has to be done within Parliamentary Assembly which has a competence to change constitution, Council of Europe bodies like Parliamentary Assembly, Secretary General and its member states should act in synergy to produce a pressure on Bosnia and Herzegovina to fulfil its international obligation such is Court's judgment implementation and Bosnian politicians have to understand implementation of these four judgments as issue of the rule of law and not to use it for its party and ethnic interests | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Government/Political systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Electoral systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court case | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642859 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800506 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184066596012032 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Išerić, Harun |
| author_facet | Išerić, Harun |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Išerić, Harun |
| author_variant | h i hi |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262656 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800506 (OCoLC)1334050294 (DE-599)BVBBV048262656 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03459nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262656</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800506</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334050294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262656</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Išerić, Harun</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini</subfield><subfield code="c">Harun Išerić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 30)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In December 2019 it will ten years of Sejdić and Finci judgment of the European Court for Human Rights. It was followed by Zornić, Šlaku and Pilav judgments. The Court found that Bosnian Constitution was not in the line with the European Convention for Human Rights. In Zornić and Šlaku judgments under Article 46 of the Convention, Court stated that in order to implement these judgments, Bosnia and Herzegovina would have to introduce constitutional and legislation amendments. All four attempts by BH public authorities to enforce Sejdić and Finci group judgments were unsuccessful. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">These attempts were characterized by: a short deadline for the drafting constitutional amendments and amendments to the Electoral Law, failure to hold sessions of the working group/parliamentary commission due to the absence of its members and consequent lack of a quorum, apparent transparency in work and lack of will to fulfil the mandate of the working group/parliamentary commission and efforts to reach an agreement on amendments. Parallel to these formal attempts, there was non-institutional process with the aim to reach a political agreement on constitutional reform. This two years process involved seven presidents of parliamentary political parties and it was facilitated by European Union. The process was not transparent, public has no insights about different proposals and it was conducted only in closed circle of seven politicians. Eventually it did not deliver any results. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In order to have Court's judgments implemented, a few conditions need to be met: it has to be done within Parliamentary Assembly which has a competence to change constitution, Council of Europe bodies like Parliamentary Assembly, Secretary General and its member states should act in synergy to produce a pressure on Bosnia and Herzegovina to fulfil its international obligation such is Court's judgment implementation and Bosnian politicians have to understand implementation of these four judgments as issue of the rule of law and not to use it for its party and ethnic interests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government/Political systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electoral systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court case</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800506</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262656 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642859 |
| oclc_num | 1334050294 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 30) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Išerić, Harun Verfasser aut Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini Harun Išerić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 30) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In December 2019 it will ten years of Sejdić and Finci judgment of the European Court for Human Rights. It was followed by Zornić, Šlaku and Pilav judgments. The Court found that Bosnian Constitution was not in the line with the European Convention for Human Rights. In Zornić and Šlaku judgments under Article 46 of the Convention, Court stated that in order to implement these judgments, Bosnia and Herzegovina would have to introduce constitutional and legislation amendments. All four attempts by BH public authorities to enforce Sejdić and Finci group judgments were unsuccessful. These attempts were characterized by: a short deadline for the drafting constitutional amendments and amendments to the Electoral Law, failure to hold sessions of the working group/parliamentary commission due to the absence of its members and consequent lack of a quorum, apparent transparency in work and lack of will to fulfil the mandate of the working group/parliamentary commission and efforts to reach an agreement on amendments. Parallel to these formal attempts, there was non-institutional process with the aim to reach a political agreement on constitutional reform. This two years process involved seven presidents of parliamentary political parties and it was facilitated by European Union. The process was not transparent, public has no insights about different proposals and it was conducted only in closed circle of seven politicians. Eventually it did not deliver any results. In order to have Court's judgments implemented, a few conditions need to be met: it has to be done within Parliamentary Assembly which has a competence to change constitution, Council of Europe bodies like Parliamentary Assembly, Secretary General and its member states should act in synergy to produce a pressure on Bosnia and Herzegovina to fulfil its international obligation such is Court's judgment implementation and Bosnian politicians have to understand implementation of these four judgments as issue of the rule of law and not to use it for its party and ethnic interests Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Government/Political systems Electoral systems EU-Legislation Court case |
| spellingShingle | Išerić, Harun Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Government/Political systems Electoral systems EU-Legislation Court case |
| title | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_auth | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_exact_search | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_full | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini Harun Išerić |
| title_fullStr | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini Harun Išerić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini Harun Išerić |
| title_short | Presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima Sejdić i Finci, Zornić, Pilav i Šlaku - nudum ius u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_sort | presude evropskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetima sejdic i finci zornic pilav i slaku nudum ius u bosni i hercegovini |
| topic | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Government/Political systems Electoral systems EU-Legislation Court case |
| topic_facet | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Government/Political systems Electoral systems EU-Legislation Court case |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT isericharun presudeevropskogsudazaljudskapravaupredmetimasejdicifincizornicpilavislakunudumiusubosniihercegovini |