Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Skopje [North Macedonia ]
Analytica
2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | This paper will give an account of the mechanisms available to the Macedonian Parliament to conduct parliamentary oversight of the intelligence services, particularly those within the jurisdiction of the specialized parliamentary committees. It will then examine cases from other states in the region and look for practices and legal solutions that they have established in order to encourage financial accountability of their intelligence services. As former Yugoslav republics, during the last two decades these states were facing the challenges of transition and building democratic, transparent and accountable institutions. However, not all of them have progressed at the same pace. The best practices are elaborated in two case-studies - Slovenia and Croatia, both members of the European Union. Furthermore, their oversight systems differ at many levels, having been created and developed according to each country's specific processes and needs. They should serve as examples to better understand the role of parliaments in ensuring the accountability of intelligence services in the implementation of programs and projects financed with state money. Thereby, the case-study sections provide a brief overview of the formal intelligence services and authorized bodies for their oversight. The focus is put on the role of the parliament (directly or indirectly through parliamentary committees) throughout the four phases of the budgetary cycle: planning, adoption, implementation and audit |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 35) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262554 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol752215 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334015745 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262554 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lembovska, Magdalena |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |c Magdalena Lembovska |
| 264 | 1 | |a Skopje [North Macedonia ] |b Analytica |c 2013 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 35) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a This paper will give an account of the mechanisms available to the Macedonian Parliament to conduct parliamentary oversight of the intelligence services, particularly those within the jurisdiction of the specialized parliamentary committees. It will then examine cases from other states in the region and look for practices and legal solutions that they have established in order to encourage financial accountability of their intelligence services. As former Yugoslav republics, during the last two decades these states were facing the challenges of transition and building democratic, transparent and accountable institutions. However, not all of them have progressed at the same pace. The best practices are elaborated in two case-studies - Slovenia and Croatia, both members of the European Union. Furthermore, their oversight systems differ at many levels, having been created and developed according to each country's specific processes and needs. They should serve as examples to better understand the role of parliaments in ensuring the accountability of intelligence services in the implementation of programs and projects financed with state money. Thereby, the case-study sections provide a brief overview of the formal intelligence services and authorized bodies for their oversight. The focus is put on the role of the parliament (directly or indirectly through parliamentary committees) throughout the four phases of the budgetary cycle: planning, adoption, implementation and audit | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Finances | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fiscal Politics / Budgeting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Accounting - Business Administration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642757 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=752215 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184066355888128 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Lembovska, Magdalena |
| author_facet | Lembovska, Magdalena |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lembovska, Magdalena |
| author_variant | m l ml |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262554 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol752215 (OCoLC)1334015745 (DE-599)BVBBV048262554 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02840nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262554</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol752215</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334015745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262554</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lembovska, Magdalena</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services</subfield><subfield code="c">Magdalena Lembovska</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Skopje [North Macedonia ]</subfield><subfield code="b">Analytica</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 35)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper will give an account of the mechanisms available to the Macedonian Parliament to conduct parliamentary oversight of the intelligence services, particularly those within the jurisdiction of the specialized parliamentary committees. It will then examine cases from other states in the region and look for practices and legal solutions that they have established in order to encourage financial accountability of their intelligence services. As former Yugoslav republics, during the last two decades these states were facing the challenges of transition and building democratic, transparent and accountable institutions. However, not all of them have progressed at the same pace. The best practices are elaborated in two case-studies - Slovenia and Croatia, both members of the European Union. Furthermore, their oversight systems differ at many levels, having been created and developed according to each country's specific processes and needs. They should serve as examples to better understand the role of parliaments in ensuring the accountability of intelligence services in the implementation of programs and projects financed with state money. Thereby, the case-study sections provide a brief overview of the formal intelligence services and authorized bodies for their oversight. The focus is put on the role of the parliament (directly or indirectly through parliamentary committees) throughout the four phases of the budgetary cycle: planning, adoption, implementation and audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Finances</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiscal Politics / Budgeting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accounting - Business Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642757</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=752215</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262554 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642757 |
| oclc_num | 1334015745 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 35) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Analytica |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Lembovska, Magdalena Verfasser aut Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services Magdalena Lembovska Skopje [North Macedonia ] Analytica 2013 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2013 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 35) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier This paper will give an account of the mechanisms available to the Macedonian Parliament to conduct parliamentary oversight of the intelligence services, particularly those within the jurisdiction of the specialized parliamentary committees. It will then examine cases from other states in the region and look for practices and legal solutions that they have established in order to encourage financial accountability of their intelligence services. As former Yugoslav republics, during the last two decades these states were facing the challenges of transition and building democratic, transparent and accountable institutions. However, not all of them have progressed at the same pace. The best practices are elaborated in two case-studies - Slovenia and Croatia, both members of the European Union. Furthermore, their oversight systems differ at many levels, having been created and developed according to each country's specific processes and needs. They should serve as examples to better understand the role of parliaments in ensuring the accountability of intelligence services in the implementation of programs and projects financed with state money. Thereby, the case-study sections provide a brief overview of the formal intelligence services and authorized bodies for their oversight. The focus is put on the role of the parliament (directly or indirectly through parliamentary committees) throughout the four phases of the budgetary cycle: planning, adoption, implementation and audit Governance Security and defense Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting Accounting - Business Administration Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
| spellingShingle | Lembovska, Magdalena Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services Governance Security and defense Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting Accounting - Business Administration Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |
| title_auth | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |
| title_exact_search | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services Magdalena Lembovska |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services Magdalena Lembovska |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services Magdalena Lembovska |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Regional Practices for Parliamentary Financial Oversight of Intelligence Services |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of regional practices for parliamentary financial oversight of intelligence services |
| topic | Governance Security and defense Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting Accounting - Business Administration Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
| topic_facet | Governance Security and defense Public Finances Fiscal Politics / Budgeting Accounting - Business Administration Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lembovskamagdalena comparativeanalysisofregionalpracticesforparliamentaryfinancialoversightofintelligenceservices |