Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Praha [Czech Republic]
Ústav mezinárodních vztahů
2016
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | If we look at the issue of nuclear disarmament from the point of view of the development of multilateral disarmament negotiations at the main forums of the disarmament apparatus (the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, the UN Disarmament Commission, the First Committee of the UN General Assembly and the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) the situation is rather dismal. Given the principle of consensus decision-making, including consensus decision-making on proposed agreements, which applies to all negotiation forums, with the exception of the First Committee and also given the lack of political will and unwillingness to reach a compromise in the results on the side of nuclear-weapon powers, the multilateral disarmament negotiations process of these bodies has stagnated for the past several years. At the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, which is the most important body with a mandate for negotiating disarmament agreements, all action has been blocked for the last twenty years. In contrast to other types of weapons of mass destruction, that is chemical and biological weapons, which are banned by relevant conventions in the long-term, there is no similar international legal instrument for the much more destructive nuclear weapons. Yet, when they discuss the issue of nuclear weapons and disarmament, all of the representatives of both nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states simultaneously support the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free world and, in this context, they sometimes recall the "Prague speech" of US President Barack Obama in April 2009, in which he unequivocally supported this goal |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 7) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262352 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol750610 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334053891 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262352 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tůma, Miroslav |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |c Miroslav Tůma |
| 264 | 1 | |a Praha [Czech Republic] |b Ústav mezinárodních vztahů |c 2016 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 7) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a If we look at the issue of nuclear disarmament from the point of view of the development of multilateral disarmament negotiations at the main forums of the disarmament apparatus (the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, the UN Disarmament Commission, the First Committee of the UN General Assembly and the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) the situation is rather dismal. Given the principle of consensus decision-making, including consensus decision-making on proposed agreements, which applies to all negotiation forums, with the exception of the First Committee and also given the lack of political will and unwillingness to reach a compromise in the results on the side of nuclear-weapon powers, the multilateral disarmament negotiations process of these bodies has stagnated for the past several years. At the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, which is the most important body with a mandate for negotiating disarmament agreements, all action has been blocked for the last twenty years. In contrast to other types of weapons of mass destruction, that is chemical and biological weapons, which are banned by relevant conventions in the long-term, there is no similar international legal instrument for the much more destructive nuclear weapons. Yet, when they discuss the issue of nuclear weapons and disarmament, all of the representatives of both nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states simultaneously support the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free world and, in this context, they sometimes recall the "Prague speech" of US President Barack Obama in April 2009, in which he unequivocally supported this goal | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a International Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642555 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=750610 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184066102132736 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Tůma, Miroslav |
| author_facet | Tůma, Miroslav |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Tůma, Miroslav |
| author_variant | m t mt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262352 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol750610 (OCoLC)1334053891 (DE-599)BVBBV048262352 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02869nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262352</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol750610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334053891</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tůma, Miroslav</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached?</subfield><subfield code="c">Miroslav Tůma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha [Czech Republic]</subfield><subfield code="b">Ústav mezinárodních vztahů</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 7)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">If we look at the issue of nuclear disarmament from the point of view of the development of multilateral disarmament negotiations at the main forums of the disarmament apparatus (the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, the UN Disarmament Commission, the First Committee of the UN General Assembly and the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) the situation is rather dismal. Given the principle of consensus decision-making, including consensus decision-making on proposed agreements, which applies to all negotiation forums, with the exception of the First Committee and also given the lack of political will and unwillingness to reach a compromise in the results on the side of nuclear-weapon powers, the multilateral disarmament negotiations process of these bodies has stagnated for the past several years. At the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, which is the most important body with a mandate for negotiating disarmament agreements, all action has been blocked for the last twenty years. In contrast to other types of weapons of mass destruction, that is chemical and biological weapons, which are banned by relevant conventions in the long-term, there is no similar international legal instrument for the much more destructive nuclear weapons. Yet, when they discuss the issue of nuclear weapons and disarmament, all of the representatives of both nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states simultaneously support the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free world and, in this context, they sometimes recall the "Prague speech" of US President Barack Obama in April 2009, in which he unequivocally supported this goal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=750610</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262352 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642555 |
| oclc_num | 1334053891 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 7) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Ústav mezinárodních vztahů |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Tůma, Miroslav Verfasser aut Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? Miroslav Tůma Praha [Czech Republic] Ústav mezinárodních vztahů 2016 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2016 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 7) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier If we look at the issue of nuclear disarmament from the point of view of the development of multilateral disarmament negotiations at the main forums of the disarmament apparatus (the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, the UN Disarmament Commission, the First Committee of the UN General Assembly and the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) the situation is rather dismal. Given the principle of consensus decision-making, including consensus decision-making on proposed agreements, which applies to all negotiation forums, with the exception of the First Committee and also given the lack of political will and unwillingness to reach a compromise in the results on the side of nuclear-weapon powers, the multilateral disarmament negotiations process of these bodies has stagnated for the past several years. At the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, which is the most important body with a mandate for negotiating disarmament agreements, all action has been blocked for the last twenty years. In contrast to other types of weapons of mass destruction, that is chemical and biological weapons, which are banned by relevant conventions in the long-term, there is no similar international legal instrument for the much more destructive nuclear weapons. Yet, when they discuss the issue of nuclear weapons and disarmament, all of the representatives of both nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states simultaneously support the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free world and, in this context, they sometimes recall the "Prague speech" of US President Barack Obama in April 2009, in which he unequivocally supported this goal International Law International relations/trade Security and defense |
| spellingShingle | Tůma, Miroslav Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? International Law International relations/trade Security and defense |
| title | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |
| title_auth | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |
| title_exact_search | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |
| title_full | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? Miroslav Tůma |
| title_fullStr | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? Miroslav Tůma |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? Miroslav Tůma |
| title_short | Can the Necessary International Legal Framework to Achieve a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World Be Reached? |
| title_sort | can the necessary international legal framework to achieve a nuclear weapon free world be reached |
| topic | International Law International relations/trade Security and defense |
| topic_facet | International Law International relations/trade Security and defense |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tumamiroslav canthenecessaryinternationallegalframeworktoachieveanuclearweaponfreeworldbereached |