Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Praha [Czech Republic]
Ústav mezinárodních vztahů
2016
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The current refugee crisis, which created a collective action problem among the EU Member States in terms of sharing the responsibility, is indeed an indicator of the lack of solidarity as regards the implementation of the Dublin System. The pressures over the Common European Asylum System due to the high refugee influx from the Middle East into Europe following the Arab Spring and the Syrian civil war has driven the EU to cooperate with its neighboring states at its external frontiers and the transit countries. Turkey, which is a transit country located at the external borders of the EU, and the only passage between Syria, Iraq and the EU, has been one of these countries with which the EU has negotiated a cooperation in solving the crisis. However, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the treatment of asylum-seekers in Turkey, brought forward the questions of considering Turkey as a "safe third country," which is one of the principles lying on the basis of the agreement. Although there are several concerns at this point, the EU and Turkey agreed to sign the agreement, where the motive of national interest prevails over the protection of human rights from the point of view of both sides. In the light of this background, the aim of this paper is to discuss the motive behind the agreement, as well as elaborate whether Turkey is a "safe third country" under the Asylum Procedures Directive |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048262256 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol749650 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334043932 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262256 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Nur Osso, Berfin |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |c Berfin Nur Osso |
264 | 1 | |a Praha [Czech Republic] |b Ústav mezinárodních vztahů |c 2016 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The current refugee crisis, which created a collective action problem among the EU Member States in terms of sharing the responsibility, is indeed an indicator of the lack of solidarity as regards the implementation of the Dublin System. The pressures over the Common European Asylum System due to the high refugee influx from the Middle East into Europe following the Arab Spring and the Syrian civil war has driven the EU to cooperate with its neighboring states at its external frontiers and the transit countries. Turkey, which is a transit country located at the external borders of the EU, and the only passage between Syria, Iraq and the EU, has been one of these countries with which the EU has negotiated a cooperation in solving the crisis. However, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the treatment of asylum-seekers in Turkey, brought forward the questions of considering Turkey as a "safe third country," which is one of the principles lying on the basis of the agreement. Although there are several concerns at this point, the EU and Turkey agreed to sign the agreement, where the motive of national interest prevails over the protection of human rights from the point of view of both sides. In the light of this background, the aim of this paper is to discuss the motive behind the agreement, as well as elaborate whether Turkey is a "safe third country" under the Asylum Procedures Directive | ||
650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
650 | 4 | |a Migration Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Peace and Conflict Studies | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642459 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=749650 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184065994129408 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Nur Osso, Berfin |
author_facet | Nur Osso, Berfin |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Nur Osso, Berfin |
author_variant | o b n ob obn |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048262256 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol749650 (OCoLC)1334043932 (DE-599)BVBBV048262256 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02761nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262256</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol749650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334043932</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262256</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nur Osso, Berfin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives</subfield><subfield code="c">Berfin Nur Osso</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha [Czech Republic]</subfield><subfield code="b">Ústav mezinárodních vztahů</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The current refugee crisis, which created a collective action problem among the EU Member States in terms of sharing the responsibility, is indeed an indicator of the lack of solidarity as regards the implementation of the Dublin System. The pressures over the Common European Asylum System due to the high refugee influx from the Middle East into Europe following the Arab Spring and the Syrian civil war has driven the EU to cooperate with its neighboring states at its external frontiers and the transit countries. Turkey, which is a transit country located at the external borders of the EU, and the only passage between Syria, Iraq and the EU, has been one of these countries with which the EU has negotiated a cooperation in solving the crisis. However, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the treatment of asylum-seekers in Turkey, brought forward the questions of considering Turkey as a "safe third country," which is one of the principles lying on the basis of the agreement. Although there are several concerns at this point, the EU and Turkey agreed to sign the agreement, where the motive of national interest prevails over the protection of human rights from the point of view of both sides. In the light of this background, the aim of this paper is to discuss the motive behind the agreement, as well as elaborate whether Turkey is a "safe third country" under the Asylum Procedures Directive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Migration Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peace and Conflict Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642459</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=749650</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048262256 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642459 |
oclc_num | 1334043932 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Ústav mezinárodních vztahů |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Nur Osso, Berfin Verfasser aut Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives Berfin Nur Osso Praha [Czech Republic] Ústav mezinárodních vztahů 2016 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2016 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The current refugee crisis, which created a collective action problem among the EU Member States in terms of sharing the responsibility, is indeed an indicator of the lack of solidarity as regards the implementation of the Dublin System. The pressures over the Common European Asylum System due to the high refugee influx from the Middle East into Europe following the Arab Spring and the Syrian civil war has driven the EU to cooperate with its neighboring states at its external frontiers and the transit countries. Turkey, which is a transit country located at the external borders of the EU, and the only passage between Syria, Iraq and the EU, has been one of these countries with which the EU has negotiated a cooperation in solving the crisis. However, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the treatment of asylum-seekers in Turkey, brought forward the questions of considering Turkey as a "safe third country," which is one of the principles lying on the basis of the agreement. Although there are several concerns at this point, the EU and Turkey agreed to sign the agreement, where the motive of national interest prevails over the protection of human rights from the point of view of both sides. In the light of this background, the aim of this paper is to discuss the motive behind the agreement, as well as elaborate whether Turkey is a "safe third country" under the Asylum Procedures Directive Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Migration Studies EU-Legislation Peace and Conflict Studies |
spellingShingle | Nur Osso, Berfin Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Migration Studies EU-Legislation Peace and Conflict Studies |
title | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |
title_auth | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |
title_exact_search | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |
title_exact_search_txtP | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |
title_full | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives Berfin Nur Osso |
title_fullStr | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives Berfin Nur Osso |
title_full_unstemmed | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives Berfin Nur Osso |
title_short | Success or Failure? Assessment of the Readmission Agreement Between the EU and Turkey from the Legal and Political Perspectives |
title_sort | success or failure assessment of the readmission agreement between the eu and turkey from the legal and political perspectives |
topic | Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Migration Studies EU-Legislation Peace and Conflict Studies |
topic_facet | Human Rights and Humanitarian Law International relations/trade Migration Studies EU-Legislation Peace and Conflict Studies |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nurossoberfin successorfailureassessmentofthereadmissionagreementbetweentheeuandturkeyfromthelegalandpoliticalperspectives |