Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Centar za Sigurnosne Studije
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | Currently (2018), the two main supporters of the region, the USA and the EU seem both too taken by their internal problems. Europe is indeed losing its attractiveness because of its own crisis and above all after Juncker's statement about no chances of enlargement in the next 5 years1, postponing the process to 2025. On the other side, there are Turkey and Russia. Turkey, with its neo-Ottoman foreign policy, is playing a great role in the area, offering a new authoritarian model. Russia, also exploiting this vacuum left by the West, is trying to affirm its influence, mainly using the Orthodox Church ties and weapons trade. The most affected countries are Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina: in different ways, approaches and perspectives, but they are the ones Russia is looking to in strengthening its position in the region, above all after Montenegro's NATO accession. Hence, the research is going to focus on the comparison between Russian interference in Serbia, always considered a great ally with shared roots and traditions, and BiH where Russian presence is peculiar, through a direct impact on the Serb and Croat political leaders |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262174 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol702995 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334020882 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262174 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stefano, Giulia |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |c Giulia Stefano |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Centar za Sigurnosne Studije |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Currently (2018), the two main supporters of the region, the USA and the EU seem both too taken by their internal problems. Europe is indeed losing its attractiveness because of its own crisis and above all after Juncker's statement about no chances of enlargement in the next 5 years1, postponing the process to 2025. On the other side, there are Turkey and Russia. Turkey, with its neo-Ottoman foreign policy, is playing a great role in the area, offering a new authoritarian model. Russia, also exploiting this vacuum left by the West, is trying to affirm its influence, mainly using the Orthodox Church ties and weapons trade. The most affected countries are Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina: in different ways, approaches and perspectives, but they are the ones Russia is looking to in strengthening its position in the region, above all after Montenegro's NATO accession. Hence, the research is going to focus on the comparison between Russian interference in Serbia, always considered a great ally with shared roots and traditions, and BiH where Russian presence is peculiar, through a direct impact on the Serb and Croat political leaders | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642377 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=702995 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065887174656 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Stefano, Giulia |
| author_facet | Stefano, Giulia |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Stefano, Giulia |
| author_variant | g s gs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262174 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol702995 (OCoLC)1334020882 (DE-599)BVBBV048262174 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02295nmm a2200361zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262174</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol702995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334020882</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stefano, Giulia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison</subfield><subfield code="c">Giulia Stefano</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centar za Sigurnosne Studije</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Currently (2018), the two main supporters of the region, the USA and the EU seem both too taken by their internal problems. Europe is indeed losing its attractiveness because of its own crisis and above all after Juncker's statement about no chances of enlargement in the next 5 years1, postponing the process to 2025. On the other side, there are Turkey and Russia. Turkey, with its neo-Ottoman foreign policy, is playing a great role in the area, offering a new authoritarian model. Russia, also exploiting this vacuum left by the West, is trying to affirm its influence, mainly using the Orthodox Church ties and weapons trade. The most affected countries are Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina: in different ways, approaches and perspectives, but they are the ones Russia is looking to in strengthening its position in the region, above all after Montenegro's NATO accession. Hence, the research is going to focus on the comparison between Russian interference in Serbia, always considered a great ally with shared roots and traditions, and BiH where Russian presence is peculiar, through a direct impact on the Serb and Croat political leaders</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642377</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=702995</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262174 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642377 |
| oclc_num | 1334020882 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Centar za Sigurnosne Studije |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Stefano, Giulia Verfasser aut Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison Giulia Stefano Sarajevo [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Centar za Sigurnosne Studije 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Currently (2018), the two main supporters of the region, the USA and the EU seem both too taken by their internal problems. Europe is indeed losing its attractiveness because of its own crisis and above all after Juncker's statement about no chances of enlargement in the next 5 years1, postponing the process to 2025. On the other side, there are Turkey and Russia. Turkey, with its neo-Ottoman foreign policy, is playing a great role in the area, offering a new authoritarian model. Russia, also exploiting this vacuum left by the West, is trying to affirm its influence, mainly using the Orthodox Church ties and weapons trade. The most affected countries are Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina: in different ways, approaches and perspectives, but they are the ones Russia is looking to in strengthening its position in the region, above all after Montenegro's NATO accession. Hence, the research is going to focus on the comparison between Russian interference in Serbia, always considered a great ally with shared roots and traditions, and BiH where Russian presence is peculiar, through a direct impact on the Serb and Croat political leaders Politics International relations/trade |
| spellingShingle | Stefano, Giulia Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison Politics International relations/trade |
| title | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |
| title_auth | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |
| title_exact_search | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |
| title_full | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison Giulia Stefano |
| title_fullStr | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison Giulia Stefano |
| title_full_unstemmed | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison Giulia Stefano |
| title_short | Russian soft power in the Balkans, Bosnia and Serbia, two states in comparison |
| title_sort | russian soft power in the balkans bosnia and serbia two states in comparison |
| topic | Politics International relations/trade |
| topic_facet | Politics International relations/trade |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stefanogiulia russiansoftpowerinthebalkansbosniaandserbiatwostatesincomparison |