Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | Within the EU Accession process, the Republic of Serbia, by adopting the Action Plan for the Chapter 23, undertook the obligation to amend its Constitution in the part related to the judiciary. In this regard, the Ministry of Justice drafted and, on January 22nd, published the Working Version of the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia taking into account the summary of six-month long consultative process with civil society conducted during last year. This paper analyzes new solutions that have been proposed by the Working text, as well as the most significant differences between them and the current Constitution. Among other things, the Working text proposes the exclusion of the National Assembly from the appointment process of judges, the removal of the probationary period for judges, revised composition and expanded jurisdiction of the High Judicial Council. Some of the proposed solutions were very welcomed by the public while others are strongly criticized. Anyway, the path between the Working text and the adoption of the Constitution is very long and all stakeholders, including the Government, civil society and the academia, need to put the effort to achieve the best result at the end, which is, naturally, to have an independent and accountable judiciary at the service of citizens |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262065 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670316 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334026412 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262065 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Prelić, Maja |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |c Maja Prelić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Within the EU Accession process, the Republic of Serbia, by adopting the Action Plan for the Chapter 23, undertook the obligation to amend its Constitution in the part related to the judiciary. In this regard, the Ministry of Justice drafted and, on January 22nd, published the Working Version of the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia taking into account the summary of six-month long consultative process with civil society conducted during last year. This paper analyzes new solutions that have been proposed by the Working text, as well as the most significant differences between them and the current Constitution. Among other things, the Working text proposes the exclusion of the National Assembly from the appointment process of judges, the removal of the probationary period for judges, revised composition and expanded jurisdiction of the High Judicial Council. Some of the proposed solutions were very welcomed by the public while others are strongly criticized. Anyway, the path between the Working text and the adoption of the Constitution is very long and all stakeholders, including the Government, civil society and the academia, need to put the effort to achieve the best result at the end, which is, naturally, to have an independent and accountable judiciary at the service of citizens | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642268 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=670316 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065731985408 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Prelić, Maja |
| author_facet | Prelić, Maja |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Prelić, Maja |
| author_variant | m p mp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262065 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670316 (OCoLC)1334026412 (DE-599)BVBBV048262065 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02713nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262065</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670316</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334026412</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prelić, Maja</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe</subfield><subfield code="c">Maja Prelić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Within the EU Accession process, the Republic of Serbia, by adopting the Action Plan for the Chapter 23, undertook the obligation to amend its Constitution in the part related to the judiciary. In this regard, the Ministry of Justice drafted and, on January 22nd, published the Working Version of the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia taking into account the summary of six-month long consultative process with civil society conducted during last year. This paper analyzes new solutions that have been proposed by the Working text, as well as the most significant differences between them and the current Constitution. Among other things, the Working text proposes the exclusion of the National Assembly from the appointment process of judges, the removal of the probationary period for judges, revised composition and expanded jurisdiction of the High Judicial Council. Some of the proposed solutions were very welcomed by the public while others are strongly criticized. Anyway, the path between the Working text and the adoption of the Constitution is very long and all stakeholders, including the Government, civil society and the academia, need to put the effort to achieve the best result at the end, which is, naturally, to have an independent and accountable judiciary at the service of citizens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642268</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=670316</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262065 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642268 |
| oclc_num | 1334026412 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Prelić, Maja Verfasser aut Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe Maja Prelić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Within the EU Accession process, the Republic of Serbia, by adopting the Action Plan for the Chapter 23, undertook the obligation to amend its Constitution in the part related to the judiciary. In this regard, the Ministry of Justice drafted and, on January 22nd, published the Working Version of the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia taking into account the summary of six-month long consultative process with civil society conducted during last year. This paper analyzes new solutions that have been proposed by the Working text, as well as the most significant differences between them and the current Constitution. Among other things, the Working text proposes the exclusion of the National Assembly from the appointment process of judges, the removal of the probationary period for judges, revised composition and expanded jurisdiction of the High Judicial Council. Some of the proposed solutions were very welcomed by the public while others are strongly criticized. Anyway, the path between the Working text and the adoption of the Constitution is very long and all stakeholders, including the Government, civil society and the academia, need to put the effort to achieve the best result at the end, which is, naturally, to have an independent and accountable judiciary at the service of citizens Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| spellingShingle | Prelić, Maja Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| title | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |
| title_auth | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |
| title_exact_search | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |
| title_full | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe Maja Prelić |
| title_fullStr | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe Maja Prelić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe Maja Prelić |
| title_short | Ustavne promene u Republici Srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana Ministarstva pravde na Ustav Republike Srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe |
| title_sort | ustavne promene u republici srbiji sa osvrtom na radni tekst amandmana ministarstva pravde na ustav republike srbije u delu koji se odnosi na pravosude |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT prelicmaja ustavnepromeneurepublicisrbijisaosvrtomnaradnitekstamandmanaministarstvapravdenaustavrepublikesrbijeudelukojiseodnosinapravosuđe |