Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Croatian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In this paper the author analyzes the decision U-II-6111/2013 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. In this decision, the Constitutional Court annulled the decision of the Municipality Council renaming a street in Slatinski Drenovac after the date of the proclamation of the Independent State of Croatia in 1941. The Constitutional Court based its jurisdiction, contrary to its earlier jurisprudence, according to the Article 2/1 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, establishing, thus, a general constitutional supervision. One of the judges had a dissenting opinion and the author analyzed the decision and the dissenting opinion. From the analysis the author concluded the following: the Constitutional Court was not in the right assuming jurisdiction in this case as it does not evolve from the Constitution or the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. The author argues that, in assuming jurisdiction in the manner the Constitutional Court has done in this particular case, the Court created legal uncertainty and acted directly contrary to its established practice and the Constitution, constitutional Law and other laws. The author argues that the explained situation is the consequence of the narrow practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia in defining "other norms" which excluded general acts from the jurisdiction of the Court. Consequently, whenever a need for inspection of general acts arises, the Court has no alternative but to alter its practice. The author argues for a broader definition of "other norms" which would include general acts |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262056 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669758 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334049434 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262056 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hrv | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Staničić, Frane |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |c Frane Staničić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In this paper the author analyzes the decision U-II-6111/2013 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. In this decision, the Constitutional Court annulled the decision of the Municipality Council renaming a street in Slatinski Drenovac after the date of the proclamation of the Independent State of Croatia in 1941. The Constitutional Court based its jurisdiction, contrary to its earlier jurisprudence, according to the Article 2/1 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, establishing, thus, a general constitutional supervision. One of the judges had a dissenting opinion and the author analyzed the decision and the dissenting opinion. From the analysis the author concluded the following: the Constitutional Court was not in the right assuming jurisdiction in this case as it does not evolve from the Constitution or the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. The author argues that, in assuming jurisdiction in the manner the Constitutional Court has done in this particular case, the Court created legal uncertainty and acted directly contrary to its established practice and the Constitution, constitutional Law and other laws. The author argues that the explained situation is the consequence of the narrow practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia in defining "other norms" which excluded general acts from the jurisdiction of the Court. Consequently, whenever a need for inspection of general acts arises, the Court has no alternative but to alter its practice. The author argues for a broader definition of "other norms" which would include general acts | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Present Times (2010 - today) | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642259 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=669758 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065716256768 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Staničić, Frane |
| author_facet | Staničić, Frane |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Staničić, Frane |
| author_variant | f s fs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262056 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669758 (OCoLC)1334049434 (DE-599)BVBBV048262056 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02995nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262056</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334049434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hrv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Staničić, Frane</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam?</subfield><subfield code="c">Frane Staničić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper the author analyzes the decision U-II-6111/2013 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. In this decision, the Constitutional Court annulled the decision of the Municipality Council renaming a street in Slatinski Drenovac after the date of the proclamation of the Independent State of Croatia in 1941. The Constitutional Court based its jurisdiction, contrary to its earlier jurisprudence, according to the Article 2/1 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, establishing, thus, a general constitutional supervision. One of the judges had a dissenting opinion and the author analyzed the decision and the dissenting opinion. From the analysis the author concluded the following: the Constitutional Court was not in the right assuming jurisdiction in this case as it does not evolve from the Constitution or the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. The author argues that, in assuming jurisdiction in the manner the Constitutional Court has done in this particular case, the Court created legal uncertainty and acted directly contrary to its established practice and the Constitution, constitutional Law and other laws. The author argues that the explained situation is the consequence of the narrow practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia in defining "other norms" which excluded general acts from the jurisdiction of the Court. Consequently, whenever a need for inspection of general acts arises, the Court has no alternative but to alter its practice. The author argues for a broader definition of "other norms" which would include general acts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Present Times (2010 - today)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=669758</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262056 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Croatian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642259 |
| oclc_num | 1334049434 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Staničić, Frane Verfasser aut Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? Frane Staničić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this paper the author analyzes the decision U-II-6111/2013 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. In this decision, the Constitutional Court annulled the decision of the Municipality Council renaming a street in Slatinski Drenovac after the date of the proclamation of the Independent State of Croatia in 1941. The Constitutional Court based its jurisdiction, contrary to its earlier jurisprudence, according to the Article 2/1 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, establishing, thus, a general constitutional supervision. One of the judges had a dissenting opinion and the author analyzed the decision and the dissenting opinion. From the analysis the author concluded the following: the Constitutional Court was not in the right assuming jurisdiction in this case as it does not evolve from the Constitution or the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. The author argues that, in assuming jurisdiction in the manner the Constitutional Court has done in this particular case, the Court created legal uncertainty and acted directly contrary to its established practice and the Constitution, constitutional Law and other laws. The author argues that the explained situation is the consequence of the narrow practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia in defining "other norms" which excluded general acts from the jurisdiction of the Court. Consequently, whenever a need for inspection of general acts arises, the Court has no alternative but to alter its practice. The author argues for a broader definition of "other norms" which would include general acts Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Governance Public Law Evaluation research Present Times (2010 - today) |
| spellingShingle | Staničić, Frane Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Governance Public Law Evaluation research Present Times (2010 - today) |
| title | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |
| title_auth | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |
| title_exact_search | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |
| title_full | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? Frane Staničić |
| title_fullStr | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? Frane Staničić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? Frane Staničić |
| title_short | Odluka Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske U-II6111/2013 - jurisdikcijski voluntarizam? |
| title_sort | odluka ustavnog suda republike hrvatske u ii6111 2013 jurisdikcijski voluntarizam |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Governance Public Law Evaluation research Present Times (2010 - today) |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Governance Public Law Evaluation research Present Times (2010 - today) |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stanicicfrane odlukaustavnogsudarepublikehrvatskeuii61112013jurisdikcijskivoluntarizam |