Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In her paper, the author analyzes the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of BH concerning the ground for detention "disturbance to public order". In numerous decisions, which where analyzed, the Constitutional Court has found violation of Article II/3.d) of the Constitution of BH and Article 5 of the Convention. The main problem with the ground for detention "disturbance to public order" is its application by domestic courts. Due to a lack of clarity and concrete criterias, domestic courts often justify its application by general and subjective explanations. In fact, the practice of domestic courts shows a pattern in how the "disturbance to public order" should be explained. In particular, the explanation of this Ground for Detention by domestic courts is just a list of arguments such as: the public order has already been violated by committed criminal offense, the public is disturbed which is proved by frequent media reports in criminal trials, the faith of the public in the judicial system is shaken, characteristics of victim or suspect/accused and the most common argument is: bad economic situation in the country and low standard of living of its citizens, when it is actually a matter of a criminal offence done by abuse of official duties. None of these arguments can justify a long period of detention. Beside decisions of the Constitutional court of BH, the need for revision of the valid provisions in criminal procedure codes in BH is confirmed by the decisions of Constitutional courts in region which were the subject of analysis. The author proposes a revision of provisions in a way that ground for detention can be used only for exhaustively numbered criminal offences |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262047 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669748 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334020986 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262047 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gotovuša, Ena |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |c Ena Gotovuša |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In her paper, the author analyzes the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of BH concerning the ground for detention "disturbance to public order". In numerous decisions, which where analyzed, the Constitutional Court has found violation of Article II/3.d) of the Constitution of BH and Article 5 of the Convention. The main problem with the ground for detention "disturbance to public order" is its application by domestic courts. Due to a lack of clarity and concrete criterias, domestic courts often justify its application by general and subjective explanations. In fact, the practice of domestic courts shows a pattern in how the "disturbance to public order" should be explained. In particular, the explanation of this Ground for Detention by domestic courts is just a list of arguments such as: the public order has already been violated by committed criminal offense, the public is disturbed which is proved by frequent media reports in criminal trials, the faith of the public in the judicial system is shaken, characteristics of victim or suspect/accused and the most common argument is: bad economic situation in the country and low standard of living of its citizens, when it is actually a matter of a criminal offence done by abuse of official duties. None of these arguments can justify a long period of detention. Beside decisions of the Constitutional court of BH, the need for revision of the valid provisions in criminal procedure codes in BH is confirmed by the decisions of Constitutional courts in region which were the subject of analysis. The author proposes a revision of provisions in a way that ground for detention can be used only for exhaustively numbered criminal offences | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642250 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=669748 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065700528128 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Gotovuša, Ena |
| author_facet | Gotovuša, Ena |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gotovuša, Ena |
| author_variant | e g eg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262047 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669748 (OCoLC)1334020986 (DE-599)BVBBV048262047 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02968nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262047</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol669748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334020986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gotovuša, Ena</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH</subfield><subfield code="c">Ena Gotovuša</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In her paper, the author analyzes the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of BH concerning the ground for detention "disturbance to public order". In numerous decisions, which where analyzed, the Constitutional Court has found violation of Article II/3.d) of the Constitution of BH and Article 5 of the Convention. The main problem with the ground for detention "disturbance to public order" is its application by domestic courts. Due to a lack of clarity and concrete criterias, domestic courts often justify its application by general and subjective explanations. In fact, the practice of domestic courts shows a pattern in how the "disturbance to public order" should be explained. In particular, the explanation of this Ground for Detention by domestic courts is just a list of arguments such as: the public order has already been violated by committed criminal offense, the public is disturbed which is proved by frequent media reports in criminal trials, the faith of the public in the judicial system is shaken, characteristics of victim or suspect/accused and the most common argument is: bad economic situation in the country and low standard of living of its citizens, when it is actually a matter of a criminal offence done by abuse of official duties. None of these arguments can justify a long period of detention. Beside decisions of the Constitutional court of BH, the need for revision of the valid provisions in criminal procedure codes in BH is confirmed by the decisions of Constitutional courts in region which were the subject of analysis. The author proposes a revision of provisions in a way that ground for detention can be used only for exhaustively numbered criminal offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=669748</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262047 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642250 |
| oclc_num | 1334020986 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gotovuša, Ena Verfasser aut Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH Ena Gotovuša Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In her paper, the author analyzes the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of BH concerning the ground for detention "disturbance to public order". In numerous decisions, which where analyzed, the Constitutional Court has found violation of Article II/3.d) of the Constitution of BH and Article 5 of the Convention. The main problem with the ground for detention "disturbance to public order" is its application by domestic courts. Due to a lack of clarity and concrete criterias, domestic courts often justify its application by general and subjective explanations. In fact, the practice of domestic courts shows a pattern in how the "disturbance to public order" should be explained. In particular, the explanation of this Ground for Detention by domestic courts is just a list of arguments such as: the public order has already been violated by committed criminal offense, the public is disturbed which is proved by frequent media reports in criminal trials, the faith of the public in the judicial system is shaken, characteristics of victim or suspect/accused and the most common argument is: bad economic situation in the country and low standard of living of its citizens, when it is actually a matter of a criminal offence done by abuse of official duties. None of these arguments can justify a long period of detention. Beside decisions of the Constitutional court of BH, the need for revision of the valid provisions in criminal procedure codes in BH is confirmed by the decisions of Constitutional courts in region which were the subject of analysis. The author proposes a revision of provisions in a way that ground for detention can be used only for exhaustively numbered criminal offences Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| spellingShingle | Gotovuša, Ena Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| title | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |
| title_auth | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |
| title_exact_search | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |
| title_full | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH Ena Gotovuša |
| title_fullStr | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH Ena Gotovuša |
| title_full_unstemmed | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH Ena Gotovuša |
| title_short | Posebni pritvorski razlog "uznemirenje javnosti" kroz praksu Ustavnog suda BiH |
| title_sort | posebni pritvorski razlog uznemirenje javnosti kroz praksu ustavnog suda bih |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gotovusaena posebnipritvorskirazloguznemirenjejavnostikrozpraksuustavnogsudabih |