Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | An independent judiciary is one of the most important pillars of the constitutional structure in any modern state. To achieve this independence it is crucial to find a suitable mechanism for the appointment of judges in order to reduce the influence of the executive branch of the government to the minimum. Comparative point of view shows that a common and magical solution do not exist. Several models have proved as very good, and one of them leaves the choice of appointment to the particular body or organ sui generis, which has different names in different countries . The Serbian Constitution of 2006 introduced a body called the High Judicial Council, which plays an important role in the selection of judges. Judicial reform has been conducted in Serbia since 2008, during which a number of large omissions have been made. This will have a fatal consequence on the Serbian legal system in the upcoming years, if not decades. In addition to the Ministry of Justice, the key players in this legal confusion are the High Judicial Council and the Constitutional Court. We have tried to draw attention to the most serious mistakes that these two bodies have made in recent years, and to propose some solutions that could contribute to remedy the situation in the Serbian judiciary |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261786 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575344 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334039295 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261786 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Marković, Đorđe |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |c Đorđe Marković |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a An independent judiciary is one of the most important pillars of the constitutional structure in any modern state. To achieve this independence it is crucial to find a suitable mechanism for the appointment of judges in order to reduce the influence of the executive branch of the government to the minimum. Comparative point of view shows that a common and magical solution do not exist. Several models have proved as very good, and one of them leaves the choice of appointment to the particular body or organ sui generis, which has different names in different countries . The Serbian Constitution of 2006 introduced a body called the High Judicial Council, which plays an important role in the selection of judges. Judicial reform has been conducted in Serbia since 2008, during which a number of large omissions have been made. This will have a fatal consequence on the Serbian legal system in the upcoming years, if not decades. In addition to the Ministry of Justice, the key players in this legal confusion are the High Judicial Council and the Constitutional Court. We have tried to draw attention to the most serious mistakes that these two bodies have made in recent years, and to propose some solutions that could contribute to remedy the situation in the Serbian judiciary | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641989 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575344 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065303117824 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Marković, Đorđe |
| author_facet | Marković, Đorđe |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Marković, Đorđe |
| author_variant | đ m đm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261786 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575344 (OCoLC)1334039295 (DE-599)BVBBV048261786 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02522nmm a2200385zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334039295</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marković, Đorđe</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji</subfield><subfield code="c">Đorđe Marković</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">An independent judiciary is one of the most important pillars of the constitutional structure in any modern state. To achieve this independence it is crucial to find a suitable mechanism for the appointment of judges in order to reduce the influence of the executive branch of the government to the minimum. Comparative point of view shows that a common and magical solution do not exist. Several models have proved as very good, and one of them leaves the choice of appointment to the particular body or organ sui generis, which has different names in different countries . The Serbian Constitution of 2006 introduced a body called the High Judicial Council, which plays an important role in the selection of judges. Judicial reform has been conducted in Serbia since 2008, during which a number of large omissions have been made. This will have a fatal consequence on the Serbian legal system in the upcoming years, if not decades. In addition to the Ministry of Justice, the key players in this legal confusion are the High Judicial Council and the Constitutional Court. We have tried to draw attention to the most serious mistakes that these two bodies have made in recent years, and to propose some solutions that could contribute to remedy the situation in the Serbian judiciary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575344</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261786 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641989 |
| oclc_num | 1334039295 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Marković, Đorđe Verfasser aut Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Đorđe Marković Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2014 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2014 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 21) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier An independent judiciary is one of the most important pillars of the constitutional structure in any modern state. To achieve this independence it is crucial to find a suitable mechanism for the appointment of judges in order to reduce the influence of the executive branch of the government to the minimum. Comparative point of view shows that a common and magical solution do not exist. Several models have proved as very good, and one of them leaves the choice of appointment to the particular body or organ sui generis, which has different names in different countries . The Serbian Constitution of 2006 introduced a body called the High Judicial Council, which plays an important role in the selection of judges. Judicial reform has been conducted in Serbia since 2008, during which a number of large omissions have been made. This will have a fatal consequence on the Serbian legal system in the upcoming years, if not decades. In addition to the Ministry of Justice, the key players in this legal confusion are the High Judicial Council and the Constitutional Court. We have tried to draw attention to the most serious mistakes that these two bodies have made in recent years, and to propose some solutions that could contribute to remedy the situation in the Serbian judiciary Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| spellingShingle | Marković, Đorđe Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| title | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_auth | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_exact_search | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_full | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Đorđe Marković |
| title_fullStr | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Đorđe Marković |
| title_full_unstemmed | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji Đorđe Marković |
| title_short | Doprinos Visokog saveta sudstva (ne)zavisnosti pravosuđa u Republici Srbiji |
| title_sort | doprinos visokog saveta sudstva ne zavisnosti pravosuda u republici srbiji |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT markovicđorđe doprinosvisokogsavetasudstvanezavisnostipravosuđaurepublicisrbiji |