Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti?:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The legal position of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and their relationship with the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy are very significant questions for judicial system in the Republic of Serbia. These both categories of professionals are interested in being elected for judges or deputies of the prosecutors by the competent authorities - The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council. As they compete for responsible functions and they aspire to become future judicial decision makers, objective and transparent process of election of applicants for judges and prosecutors is compulsory condition for independent and efficient judiciary. This paper analyses work status, rights and obligations of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants with the particular emphasis on their regular tasks, related with different branches of law and complex procedures and the main advantages of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants as distinct from the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy. One education, whether it lasts, can not replace the years of experience and can not be eo ipso the key criteria for final election. Also, several decisions reached by Constitutional Court regarding the process of election and the competence of The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council are discussed, because they made an important contribution to verifying the substantial and irreplaceable role of assistants. In order to resolve the specific legal situation, there have been considered possible ways of assistance, set of future activities and communication between Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261772 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575186 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334017009 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261772 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lazović, Lazar |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2017 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The legal position of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and their relationship with the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy are very significant questions for judicial system in the Republic of Serbia. These both categories of professionals are interested in being elected for judges or deputies of the prosecutors by the competent authorities - The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council. As they compete for responsible functions and they aspire to become future judicial decision makers, objective and transparent process of election of applicants for judges and prosecutors is compulsory condition for independent and efficient judiciary. This paper analyses work status, rights and obligations of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants with the particular emphasis on their regular tasks, related with different branches of law and complex procedures and the main advantages of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants as distinct from the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy. One education, whether it lasts, can not replace the years of experience and can not be eo ipso the key criteria for final election. Also, several decisions reached by Constitutional Court regarding the process of election and the competence of The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council are discussed, because they made an important contribution to verifying the substantial and irreplaceable role of assistants. In order to resolve the specific legal situation, there have been considered possible ways of assistance, set of future activities and communication between Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Higher Education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a State/Government and Education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krstić, Gordana |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gajić, Jelena |4 aut | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641975 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575186 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065274806272 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Lazović, Lazar Krstić, Gordana Gajić, Jelena |
| author_facet | Lazović, Lazar Krstić, Gordana Gajić, Jelena |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Lazović, Lazar |
| author_variant | l l ll g k gk j g jg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261772 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575186 (OCoLC)1334017009 (DE-599)BVBBV048261772 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03125nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261772</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575186</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334017009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lazović, Lazar</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The legal position of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and their relationship with the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy are very significant questions for judicial system in the Republic of Serbia. These both categories of professionals are interested in being elected for judges or deputies of the prosecutors by the competent authorities - The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council. As they compete for responsible functions and they aspire to become future judicial decision makers, objective and transparent process of election of applicants for judges and prosecutors is compulsory condition for independent and efficient judiciary. This paper analyses work status, rights and obligations of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants with the particular emphasis on their regular tasks, related with different branches of law and complex procedures and the main advantages of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants as distinct from the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy. One education, whether it lasts, can not replace the years of experience and can not be eo ipso the key criteria for final election. Also, several decisions reached by Constitutional Court regarding the process of election and the competence of The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council are discussed, because they made an important contribution to verifying the substantial and irreplaceable role of assistants. In order to resolve the specific legal situation, there have been considered possible ways of assistance, set of future activities and communication between Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Higher Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">State/Government and Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krstić, Gordana</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gajić, Jelena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641975</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575186</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261772 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641975 |
| oclc_num | 1334017009 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Lazović, Lazar Verfasser aut Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2017 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The legal position of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and their relationship with the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy are very significant questions for judicial system in the Republic of Serbia. These both categories of professionals are interested in being elected for judges or deputies of the prosecutors by the competent authorities - The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council. As they compete for responsible functions and they aspire to become future judicial decision makers, objective and transparent process of election of applicants for judges and prosecutors is compulsory condition for independent and efficient judiciary. This paper analyses work status, rights and obligations of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants with the particular emphasis on their regular tasks, related with different branches of law and complex procedures and the main advantages of Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants as distinct from the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy. One education, whether it lasts, can not replace the years of experience and can not be eo ipso the key criteria for final election. Also, several decisions reached by Constitutional Court regarding the process of election and the competence of The High Court Council and The State Prosecutorial Council are discussed, because they made an important contribution to verifying the substantial and irreplaceable role of assistants. In order to resolve the specific legal situation, there have been considered possible ways of assistance, set of future activities and communication between Judicial and Prosecutorial Assistants and the beneficiaries of the initial training at the Judicial Academy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Higher Education State/Government and Education Evaluation research Krstić, Gordana aut Gajić, Jelena aut |
| spellingShingle | Lazović, Lazar Krstić, Gordana Gajić, Jelena Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Higher Education State/Government and Education Evaluation research |
| title | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_auth | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_exact_search | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_full | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_fullStr | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_short | Sudijski i tužilački pomoćnici i Pravosudna akademija - konkurenti ili oponenti? |
| title_sort | sudijski i tuzilacki pomocnici i pravosudna akademija konkurenti ili oponenti |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Higher Education State/Government and Education Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Higher Education State/Government and Education Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lazoviclazar sudijskiituzilackipomocniciipravosudnaakademijakonkurentiilioponenti AT krsticgordana sudijskiituzilackipomocniciipravosudnaakademijakonkurentiilioponenti AT gajicjelena sudijskiituzilackipomocniciipravosudnaakademijakonkurentiilioponenti |