Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Croatian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The article gives an overview of the approach of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (CCRC) to the development of the constitutional human rights standards. The overview shows how the Court has been for years "chained" by the principle of legality which was reflected in both constitutional standards given for the principle of equality before the law and the right to property. The reasoning of the standards' violations lacked sufficient justification from constitutional perspective. In that regard, the acceptance of the European, i.e. Convention standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) were welcome and necessary. They encouraged the change of the Constitutional Court's approach to human rights protection and contributed to the development of their standards. However, this following up implies the issue of the relationship between CCRC and ECHR with regard to the positioning of the ECHR like a hierarchical body in the reviewing process as well as to the question of the procedural limits which govern CCRC in the course of the constitutional complaint's review. Both of these aspects need to be discussed between two courts for the benefit of both of them. Dialogue before and during the ECHR procedure might be a proper way for the future cooperation that might reduce the possible collisions |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261736 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575129 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334053948 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261736 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hrv | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Banić, Slavica |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |c Slavica Banić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2013 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The article gives an overview of the approach of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (CCRC) to the development of the constitutional human rights standards. The overview shows how the Court has been for years "chained" by the principle of legality which was reflected in both constitutional standards given for the principle of equality before the law and the right to property. The reasoning of the standards' violations lacked sufficient justification from constitutional perspective. In that regard, the acceptance of the European, i.e. Convention standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) were welcome and necessary. They encouraged the change of the Constitutional Court's approach to human rights protection and contributed to the development of their standards. However, this following up implies the issue of the relationship between CCRC and ECHR with regard to the positioning of the ECHR like a hierarchical body in the reviewing process as well as to the question of the procedural limits which govern CCRC in the course of the constitutional complaint's review. Both of these aspects need to be discussed between two courts for the benefit of both of them. Dialogue before and during the ECHR procedure might be a proper way for the future cooperation that might reduce the possible collisions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641939 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575129 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065226571776 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Banić, Slavica |
| author_facet | Banić, Slavica |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Banić, Slavica |
| author_variant | s b sb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261736 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575129 (OCoLC)1334053948 (DE-599)BVBBV048261736 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02680nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261736</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334053948</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261736</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hrv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Banić, Slavica</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj</subfield><subfield code="c">Slavica Banić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article gives an overview of the approach of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (CCRC) to the development of the constitutional human rights standards. The overview shows how the Court has been for years "chained" by the principle of legality which was reflected in both constitutional standards given for the principle of equality before the law and the right to property. The reasoning of the standards' violations lacked sufficient justification from constitutional perspective. In that regard, the acceptance of the European, i.e. Convention standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) were welcome and necessary. They encouraged the change of the Constitutional Court's approach to human rights protection and contributed to the development of their standards. However, this following up implies the issue of the relationship between CCRC and ECHR with regard to the positioning of the ECHR like a hierarchical body in the reviewing process as well as to the question of the procedural limits which govern CCRC in the course of the constitutional complaint's review. Both of these aspects need to be discussed between two courts for the benefit of both of them. Dialogue before and during the ECHR procedure might be a proper way for the future cooperation that might reduce the possible collisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575129</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261736 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Croatian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641939 |
| oclc_num | 1334053948 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Banić, Slavica Verfasser aut Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj Slavica Banić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2013 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2013 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The article gives an overview of the approach of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (CCRC) to the development of the constitutional human rights standards. The overview shows how the Court has been for years "chained" by the principle of legality which was reflected in both constitutional standards given for the principle of equality before the law and the right to property. The reasoning of the standards' violations lacked sufficient justification from constitutional perspective. In that regard, the acceptance of the European, i.e. Convention standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) were welcome and necessary. They encouraged the change of the Constitutional Court's approach to human rights protection and contributed to the development of their standards. However, this following up implies the issue of the relationship between CCRC and ECHR with regard to the positioning of the ECHR like a hierarchical body in the reviewing process as well as to the question of the procedural limits which govern CCRC in the course of the constitutional complaint's review. Both of these aspects need to be discussed between two courts for the benefit of both of them. Dialogue before and during the ECHR procedure might be a proper way for the future cooperation that might reduce the possible collisions Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
| spellingShingle | Banić, Slavica Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
| title | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |
| title_auth | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |
| title_exact_search | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |
| title_full | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj Slavica Banić |
| title_fullStr | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj Slavica Banić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj Slavica Banić |
| title_short | Pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zaštitu ljudskih prava u Republici Hrvatskoj |
| title_sort | pregled i smjer razvitka ustavnosudskih standarda za zastitu ljudskih prava u republici hrvatskoj |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT banicslavica pregledismjerrazvitkaustavnosudskihstandardazazastituljudskihpravaurepublicihrvatskoj |