Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Croatian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2015
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | Although the European Union's acquis communitaire was not an integral part of the national legal system and legislation in the period before Croatia's accession to the EU, EU law still played a significant role in Croatian national legislation, both in creation of new laws and modification of existing ones, as well as in interpretation of ambiguous, vague or undetermined provisions of national laws and bylaws, especially in competition law cases. The grounds for such influence of EU law on national legislation was found in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (hereinafter: SAA), an international treaty signed between the Republic of Croatia, European Communities and their Member States on October 29th 2001, which provided that Republic of Croatia shall endeavour to ensure that its existing laws and future legislation will be gradually made compatible with the acquis communitaire, and that national competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether certain agreements and practices of undertakings or state itself are contrary to SAA's principles regarding the protection of the free market, shall resort to criteria arising from the application of the competition rules applicable in the Community, in particular from Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions. Relying on such provision of the SAA, the competent administrative body in Croatia and Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia, in several competition law cases relied on EU law as a supplementary instrument for the interpretation of national legislation, in those situations where national law contained certain ambiguities or legal voids, or in situations where national legislation failed to regulate certain matters. The validity of such practice was disputed by unsatisfied parties, and consequently, the matter was brought before the Constitutional Court of Republic of Croatia, which in its decision dock.no. U-III-1410/2007 of February 13th 2008 adopted a standpoint that competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether there has been a violation of free market in a certain case, are not only authorised but obliged to consult criteria and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions, even when agreements and practices of undertakings in question pertain to the time period before the SAA came into force. However, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia emphasised that EU law should not be used as a formal and primary source of law in Republic of Croatia, but as a strong and important instrument for interpretation of national legislation or for filling its legal voids, but only to the extent that such interpretation is in the spirit of national legislation and is not in contradiction with its explicit provisions |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261686 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575112 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334021839 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261686 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hrv | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pugel, Daria |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |c Daria Pugel |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2015 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Although the European Union's acquis communitaire was not an integral part of the national legal system and legislation in the period before Croatia's accession to the EU, EU law still played a significant role in Croatian national legislation, both in creation of new laws and modification of existing ones, as well as in interpretation of ambiguous, vague or undetermined provisions of national laws and bylaws, especially in competition law cases. | ||
| 500 | |a The grounds for such influence of EU law on national legislation was found in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (hereinafter: SAA), an international treaty signed between the Republic of Croatia, European Communities and their Member States on October 29th 2001, which provided that Republic of Croatia shall endeavour to ensure that its existing laws and future legislation will be gradually made compatible with the acquis communitaire, and that national competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether certain agreements and practices of undertakings or state itself are contrary to SAA's principles regarding the protection of the free market, shall resort to criteria arising from the application of the competition rules applicable in the Community, in particular from Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions. | ||
| 500 | |a Relying on such provision of the SAA, the competent administrative body in Croatia and Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia, in several competition law cases relied on EU law as a supplementary instrument for the interpretation of national legislation, in those situations where national law contained certain ambiguities or legal voids, or in situations where national legislation failed to regulate certain matters. The validity of such practice was disputed by unsatisfied parties, and consequently, the matter was brought before the Constitutional Court of Republic of Croatia, which in its decision dock.no. | ||
| 500 | |a U-III-1410/2007 of February 13th 2008 adopted a standpoint that competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether there has been a violation of free market in a certain case, are not only authorised but obliged to consult criteria and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions, even when agreements and practices of undertakings in question pertain to the time period before the SAA came into force. However, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia emphasised that EU law should not be used as a formal and primary source of law in Republic of Croatia, but as a strong and important instrument for interpretation of national legislation or for filling its legal voids, but only to the extent that such interpretation is in the spirit of national legislation and is not in contradiction with its explicit provisions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641889 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575112 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065181483008 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pugel, Daria |
| author_facet | Pugel, Daria |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pugel, Daria |
| author_variant | d p dp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261686 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575112 (OCoLC)1334021839 (DE-599)BVBBV048261686 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04253nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261686</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334021839</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261686</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hrv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pugel, Daria</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji</subfield><subfield code="c">Daria Pugel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although the European Union's acquis communitaire was not an integral part of the national legal system and legislation in the period before Croatia's accession to the EU, EU law still played a significant role in Croatian national legislation, both in creation of new laws and modification of existing ones, as well as in interpretation of ambiguous, vague or undetermined provisions of national laws and bylaws, especially in competition law cases. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The grounds for such influence of EU law on national legislation was found in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (hereinafter: SAA), an international treaty signed between the Republic of Croatia, European Communities and their Member States on October 29th 2001, which provided that Republic of Croatia shall endeavour to ensure that its existing laws and future legislation will be gradually made compatible with the acquis communitaire, and that national competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether certain agreements and practices of undertakings or state itself are contrary to SAA's principles regarding the protection of the free market, shall resort to criteria arising from the application of the competition rules applicable in the Community, in particular from Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Relying on such provision of the SAA, the competent administrative body in Croatia and Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia, in several competition law cases relied on EU law as a supplementary instrument for the interpretation of national legislation, in those situations where national law contained certain ambiguities or legal voids, or in situations where national legislation failed to regulate certain matters. The validity of such practice was disputed by unsatisfied parties, and consequently, the matter was brought before the Constitutional Court of Republic of Croatia, which in its decision dock.no. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">U-III-1410/2007 of February 13th 2008 adopted a standpoint that competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether there has been a violation of free market in a certain case, are not only authorised but obliged to consult criteria and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions, even when agreements and practices of undertakings in question pertain to the time period before the SAA came into force. However, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia emphasised that EU law should not be used as a formal and primary source of law in Republic of Croatia, but as a strong and important instrument for interpretation of national legislation or for filling its legal voids, but only to the extent that such interpretation is in the spirit of national legislation and is not in contradiction with its explicit provisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641889</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575112</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261686 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Croatian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641889 |
| oclc_num | 1334021839 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Pugel, Daria Verfasser aut Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji Daria Pugel Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2015 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2015 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Although the European Union's acquis communitaire was not an integral part of the national legal system and legislation in the period before Croatia's accession to the EU, EU law still played a significant role in Croatian national legislation, both in creation of new laws and modification of existing ones, as well as in interpretation of ambiguous, vague or undetermined provisions of national laws and bylaws, especially in competition law cases. The grounds for such influence of EU law on national legislation was found in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (hereinafter: SAA), an international treaty signed between the Republic of Croatia, European Communities and their Member States on October 29th 2001, which provided that Republic of Croatia shall endeavour to ensure that its existing laws and future legislation will be gradually made compatible with the acquis communitaire, and that national competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether certain agreements and practices of undertakings or state itself are contrary to SAA's principles regarding the protection of the free market, shall resort to criteria arising from the application of the competition rules applicable in the Community, in particular from Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions. Relying on such provision of the SAA, the competent administrative body in Croatia and Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia, in several competition law cases relied on EU law as a supplementary instrument for the interpretation of national legislation, in those situations where national law contained certain ambiguities or legal voids, or in situations where national legislation failed to regulate certain matters. The validity of such practice was disputed by unsatisfied parties, and consequently, the matter was brought before the Constitutional Court of Republic of Croatia, which in its decision dock.no. U-III-1410/2007 of February 13th 2008 adopted a standpoint that competent administrative bodies and courts, when assessing whether there has been a violation of free market in a certain case, are not only authorised but obliged to consult criteria and interpretative instruments adopted by the Community institutions, even when agreements and practices of undertakings in question pertain to the time period before the SAA came into force. However, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia emphasised that EU law should not be used as a formal and primary source of law in Republic of Croatia, but as a strong and important instrument for interpretation of national legislation or for filling its legal voids, but only to the extent that such interpretation is in the spirit of national legislation and is not in contradiction with its explicit provisions Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| spellingShingle | Pugel, Daria Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| title | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |
| title_auth | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |
| title_exact_search | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |
| title_full | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji Daria Pugel |
| title_fullStr | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji Daria Pugel |
| title_full_unstemmed | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji Daria Pugel |
| title_short | Primjena europskog prava u tumačenju domaćih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja Republike Hrvatske Europskoj uniji |
| title_sort | primjena europskog prava u tumacenju domacih propisa u razdoblju prije pristupanja republike hrvatske europskoj uniji |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pugeldaria primjenaeuropskogpravautumacenjudomacihpropisaurazdobljuprijepristupanjarepublikehrvatskeeuropskojuniji |