Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The immediate motive for discussion on topic from the title is decision of Government of RS, which the user of investment funds, economic subject in charge for the building "Andric town" in Visegrad, is free of using rules from the Law on public procurement. According to the article 5 of the Law on public procurement, there are categories of agreement which are prescribed, that can be dismissed from the using rules of this Law. Analising this act, it was found that the decision of Government of RS doesn't have foundation in the Law on public procurement. Does the Government of RS, or economic subject is obligated to apply the rules of the PPL, we can give positive answer with the analysis of article 3 of this Law. Mentioned decision of Government of RS violates the main principles of PPL in BH, like the principle of the most effective way of using public investment funds, principle of transparency, principle of equal treatment and nondiscrimination, and the principle of equal competition among the providers. In the consideration of final value of project, principles of public procurement in EU and international competition of economic subjects, are also violated. The controversial decision of Government of RS showed that in valid Law on public procurement of BH aren't provided this and similar cases, so with this Law are not clearly given powers to the state institutions, responsible for the proper application of the laws, to act ex officio. However, there remains space for debate, does the article 48 (4) implies that the Agency for public procurement of BH has that right. Besides that, PPL of BH did not include adequate legal remedies for the same or similar cases |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 22) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261647 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574495 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334015544 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261647 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zlomužica, Rifat |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |c Rifat Zlomužica |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2012 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 22) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The immediate motive for discussion on topic from the title is decision of Government of RS, which the user of investment funds, economic subject in charge for the building "Andric town" in Visegrad, is free of using rules from the Law on public procurement. According to the article 5 of the Law on public procurement, there are categories of agreement which are prescribed, that can be dismissed from the using rules of this Law. Analising this act, it was found that the decision of Government of RS doesn't have foundation in the Law on public procurement. Does the Government of RS, or economic subject is obligated to apply the rules of the PPL, we can give positive answer with the analysis of article 3 of this Law. Mentioned decision of Government of RS violates the main principles of PPL in BH, like the principle of the most effective way of using public investment funds, principle of transparency, principle of equal treatment and nondiscrimination, and the principle of equal competition among the providers. In the consideration of final value of project, principles of public procurement in EU and international competition of economic subjects, are also violated. The controversial decision of Government of RS showed that in valid Law on public procurement of BH aren't provided this and similar cases, so with this Law are not clearly given powers to the state institutions, responsible for the proper application of the laws, to act ex officio. However, there remains space for debate, does the article 48 (4) implies that the Agency for public procurement of BH has that right. Besides that, PPL of BH did not include adequate legal remedies for the same or similar cases | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law on Economics | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641850 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=574495 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065110179840 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Zlomužica, Rifat |
| author_facet | Zlomužica, Rifat |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Zlomužica, Rifat |
| author_variant | r z rz |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261647 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574495 (OCoLC)1334015544 (DE-599)BVBBV048261647 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02959nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261647</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334015544</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zlomužica, Rifat</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad</subfield><subfield code="c">Rifat Zlomužica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 22)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The immediate motive for discussion on topic from the title is decision of Government of RS, which the user of investment funds, economic subject in charge for the building "Andric town" in Visegrad, is free of using rules from the Law on public procurement. According to the article 5 of the Law on public procurement, there are categories of agreement which are prescribed, that can be dismissed from the using rules of this Law. Analising this act, it was found that the decision of Government of RS doesn't have foundation in the Law on public procurement. Does the Government of RS, or economic subject is obligated to apply the rules of the PPL, we can give positive answer with the analysis of article 3 of this Law. Mentioned decision of Government of RS violates the main principles of PPL in BH, like the principle of the most effective way of using public investment funds, principle of transparency, principle of equal treatment and nondiscrimination, and the principle of equal competition among the providers. In the consideration of final value of project, principles of public procurement in EU and international competition of economic subjects, are also violated. The controversial decision of Government of RS showed that in valid Law on public procurement of BH aren't provided this and similar cases, so with this Law are not clearly given powers to the state institutions, responsible for the proper application of the laws, to act ex officio. However, there remains space for debate, does the article 48 (4) implies that the Agency for public procurement of BH has that right. Besides that, PPL of BH did not include adequate legal remedies for the same or similar cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law on Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=574495</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261647 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641850 |
| oclc_num | 1334015544 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 22) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Zlomužica, Rifat Verfasser aut Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad Rifat Zlomužica Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2012 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2012 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 22) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The immediate motive for discussion on topic from the title is decision of Government of RS, which the user of investment funds, economic subject in charge for the building "Andric town" in Visegrad, is free of using rules from the Law on public procurement. According to the article 5 of the Law on public procurement, there are categories of agreement which are prescribed, that can be dismissed from the using rules of this Law. Analising this act, it was found that the decision of Government of RS doesn't have foundation in the Law on public procurement. Does the Government of RS, or economic subject is obligated to apply the rules of the PPL, we can give positive answer with the analysis of article 3 of this Law. Mentioned decision of Government of RS violates the main principles of PPL in BH, like the principle of the most effective way of using public investment funds, principle of transparency, principle of equal treatment and nondiscrimination, and the principle of equal competition among the providers. In the consideration of final value of project, principles of public procurement in EU and international competition of economic subjects, are also violated. The controversial decision of Government of RS showed that in valid Law on public procurement of BH aren't provided this and similar cases, so with this Law are not clearly given powers to the state institutions, responsible for the proper application of the laws, to act ex officio. However, there remains space for debate, does the article 48 (4) implies that the Agency for public procurement of BH has that right. Besides that, PPL of BH did not include adequate legal remedies for the same or similar cases Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Law on Economics |
| spellingShingle | Zlomužica, Rifat Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Law on Economics |
| title | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |
| title_auth | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |
| title_exact_search | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |
| title_full | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad Rifat Zlomužica |
| title_fullStr | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad Rifat Zlomužica |
| title_full_unstemmed | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad Rifat Zlomužica |
| title_short | Izbjegavanje primjene Zakona o javnim nabavkama BiH, Projekt "Andrićgrad |
| title_sort | izbjegavanje primjene zakona o javnim nabavkama bih projekt andricgrad |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Law on Economics |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Law on Economics |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zlomuzicarifat izbjegavanjeprimjenezakonaojavnimnabavkamabihprojektandricgrad |